PRIMARY AMPUTATION, ETC.

102. An upper extremity should not be amputated for almost any accident

which can happen to it from musket-shot; and there is scarcely an

injury of the soft parts likely to occur which would authorize

amputation as a primary operation.

103. If the head or articulating extremity of the bone entering into

the composition of the shoulder-joint be merely or slightly injured

by musket-shot, the arm ought to be saved with some defect of motion

in the joint. The wound should be enlarged in the first instance, to

allow of a sufficient examination with the point of the finger, and

any loose pieces of bone should be removed. Inflammation is to be

restrained within due bounds until suppuration has been established,

when, if a clear depending opening should not exist for the discharge

of the matter poured out, it should be made, and any loose portions of

bone removed. The principal points to attend to are, the prevention

of sinuses around the joint, by the formation of dependent openings,

position, perfect quietude, due support, the methodical application of

bandages, and occasional mild stimulating injections into the wound. A

simple incised wound penetrating the joint, and even injuring the bone,

does not call for any immediate operation. An attempt should be made

to effect a cure by the first intention, which can only be managed by

means of proper position and support.

104. If the head of the bone be much splintered, or if a ball have gone

through it, that portion should be sawn off; for a part thus injured

has often been a source of great inconvenience and suffering for many

years afterward--during, in fact, the remainder of the life of the

sufferer; which misery would have been avoided by the excision of the

head of the bone in the first instance--an operation which ought in

fact to be done even at a later period, if it had not been performed

at the time when the injury was received. Secondary operations of this

kind are never so successful as primary ones, and great discrimination

should be exercised in attempting to save the head of the bone, or, in

other words, to avoid the operation for its removal.

105. When the splinters extend far into the shaft of the humerus,

it may be proper to amputate the whole extremity, especially if the

great artery be also wounded; but the shaft is seldom broken in such

accidents to any great extent, and amputation should be confined almost

to injuries from cannon-shot or shells, or heavy machinery, destructive

of the soft parts as well as of the bone.

106. When the injury done to the upper arm is so extensive that it

cannot be saved, although the head of the humerus be not injured, the

amputation should take place immediately below the tuberosities, and

not at the joint, which latter operation always renders the shoulder

flatter, and the appearance of the person more unseemly, than when the

head of the bone is left in its place.

107. It will frequently happen that the arm may be irrecoverably

shattered, and the thorax partake in a less degree of the injury, there

being apparent only some slight contusion or grazing of the skin; if

low down, the elasticity of the false ribs may have prevented the

integuments being much injured in appearance, although the blow has

been violent; yet the force of the large shot may have ruptured the

liver or spleen. If higher up, it may perhaps fracture the ribs, in

addition to a more severe contusion of the integuments. When these

accidents occur, the symptoms arising from the wound or contusion

of the trunk of the body are to be first considered. If they do not

indicate a speedy dissolution of the patient, or the prospect of such

an event in two or three days, the operation ought to be performed,

and a chance of recovery given to the sufferer, which he would not

have, the arm being retained, and the injury of the chest remaining

the same. The danger to be apprehended in the more favorable cases is

from inflammation, and this will be rather diminished than increased

by the operation; the danger of deferring which is manifest and

certain, while the injury committed in the thorax or abdomen is not

ascertained, and its effects may be obviated. If the termination should

be unfavorable, it can only be a matter of regret for the sake of the

individual, and not for the non-performance of a duty. If the cavity

of the chest be laid open, or several ribs beaten in, or a stuffing

of the lungs take place from a large ruptured blood-vessel--all of

which circumstances are obvious, and cannot be mistaken--the operation

would, in all probability, be useless. A hemorrhage of short duration,

or the expectoration of blood in moderate quantities, although a

dangerous symptom, is not to be considered as depriving the patient

of a reasonable chance for life, for it frequently follows blows from

more common causes, from which many people recover. If the operation

be delayed to ascertain what injury may have been done to the chest,

from the symptoms that will follow, the danger resulting from both will

be increased; and even when it has been ascertained that there is but

little mischief existing in the thorax, the operation can no longer be

performed with the same propriety, in consequence of the inflammation

which has supervened; and the patient will probably die, when he would

have recovered under a more decided mode of treatment.

108. A round shot or flat piece of shell may strike the arm, after

rebounding from the ground, or when nearly exhausted in force, without

breaking the skin, or only slightly doing it, yet all the parts within

may be so much injured as not to be able to recover themselves: the

bone may be considerably broken or splintered, the muscles and nerves

greatly contused. The injury may not, perhaps, be quite so extensive.

The bone may be merely fractured, and yet the soft parts will often be

so much destroyed as not to be able to carry on their usual actions.

A ruptured blood-vessel may, with an apparently slight external wound

of this nature, pour out its blood between the muscles, and inject the

arm to nearly double its size, all of which are causes rendering an

operation necessary, and requiring decision, for inflammation will,

and mortification may, ensue in a short time, when the most favorable

moment for operation will have been lost.

109. _Amputation at the shoulder-joint_ is an operation of little

surgical importance. The fear formerly entertained of loss of blood

has passed away, and every surgeon now knows that if he should happen

to cut the axillary artery unintentionally, it can be held between the

forefinger and thumb, without difficulty or danger, until a ligature

can be placed upon it. No accomplished surgeon of the present day

should give himself the least concern about compressing the subclavian

artery. It is, on the contrary, better, when the arm is raised from

the side preparatory to entering or using the knife, that the surgeon

should then feel the pulsation of the artery in the axilla, that he

may the more easily avoid, and subsequently command it. The axillary

artery does not throw out much blood at each pulsation, and a little

pressure with the end of the forefinger will always prevent bleeding,

until the surgeon is prepared to take hold of the vessel with the

tenaculum or forceps. The operator should, in fact, divest himself of

all fear of hemorrhage. When gentlemen are afraid, however, and cannot

help it, (for Henry IV. of France, _ce roy si vaillant_, always felt an

inconvenient intestinal motion when a fight began,) compression may be

made upon the subclavian artery by the thumb of an assistant, the round

handle of a key, or the padded end of the handle of a tourniquet; the

latter forms the best pad, and is usually at hand.

110. The great point to be attended to in performing the operation is

to save skin to cover the stump. The directions, therefore, which are

usually given for doing it after any particular method can only be

occasionally useful; for the surgeon may not always be able to select

the parts to be divided or retained. In cases of malignant disease

of the bone and periosteum of the middle of the arm, my experience

directs the removal of the whole of the bone at the joint, and not the

amputation below the head; although the appearance of the integuments,

and of the bone itself, would seem to encourage the attempt to preserve

the roundness of the shoulder. In such cases, the removal of the

extremity at the joint may be done by any one of the many ways which

have been recommended for its performance. In none should the acromion

or coracoid process be exposed, unless previously injured. Neither is

it necessary to lose time, or to give pain, by depriving the glenoid

cavity of its cartilage; but it should always be borne in mind that if

the nerves be not shortened after the removal of the arm, they may be

included in or adhere to the cicatrix, and cause, during a long life,

much distressing pain to the sufferer.

111. Amputation at the shoulder-joint, performed immediately after

the receipt of an injury, is now a very simple operation, for which

simplicity English surgery is also indebted to the Peninsular war. As

a _secondary_ operation, or done at a later period, when the parts are

all impacted together, it is less so. In both stages it is absolutely

necessary to remember--1st. That, except in cases of disease, and not

of injury, the shaft of the bone must be broken; and that _all_ the

directions usually given for rotation of the arm inward and outward

during the operation are _unnecessary cruelties_ not to be attempted,

and rarely to be effected if attempted, with a broken bone. 2d. That

the arm should always be raised from the side and supported by the

hand of an assistant, who can feel, if he please, at any time of the

operation, the pulsation of the axillary artery; and all operative

methods are hereby condemned in which this precautionary measure is not

the first step.

112. _Operation by two flaps, external and internal._--The

outer--beginning nearly an inch below the acromion process, the hair in

the axilla having been previously removed--is to be carried down with

a gentle curve so deeply as to divide the deltoid muscle, and to show

the long head of the triceps at its under and outer edge. The second

incision is to be carried in a similar direction on the inside, through

the deltoid muscle, but need not divide the insertion of the pectoralis

major, which should be exposed. These flaps being held back, the joint

will be seen and readily opened into at its upper part, by cutting upon

the head of the bone, in doing which the long tendon of the biceps will

be divided, allowing the head of the humerus to drop from the glenoid

cavity sufficiently to admit the forefinger of the left hand, on which

the supra-spinatus, infra-spinatus, and teres minor may be cut through

externally, as they go to be inserted into the great tuberosity,

and the thick tendon of the sub-scapularis muscle internally, where

it is attached to the smaller tuberosity. The head of the bone is

then readily drawn out from the glenoid cavity, when the inner flap,

including the axillary artery, vein, and nerves, may be taken hold

of between the two forefingers and thumb of an assistant, while the

surgeon, with one sweep of the knife, divides all the remaining parts

below. The axillary and the posterior circumflex arteries will have to

be secured; the anterior circumflex, when arising from the posterior,

is frequently cut off with it; the nerves are to be shortened; the

flaps brought together by sutures; and an especial pad placed upon the

pectoralis major, to prevent unnecessary retraction, if possible.

113. _The operation by one_, or nearly one upper flap, is to be

performed when the under soft parts of the arm have been destroyed,

and the bone broken. It may be done by thrusting a small, two-edged

knife through the integuments and under the deltoid muscle, from side

to side, to form a flap; or it may be made by commencing an incision

an inch above the posterior fold of the armpit, and carrying it over

the arm in a curved form, the convexity being downward, to the same

height on the anterior fold; the lowest part of the incision being five

fingers’ breadth from the point of the acromion, the posterior end or

point of it being somewhat higher than the anterior one. The flap being

turned up, and the tendon of the pectoralis major divided, the head of

the bone is to be exposed and separated as before stated, as much as

possible of the integuments being preserved on the under part of the

arm. This will often be best done by dissecting out the head and broken

pieces of bone, and then preserving in succession every piece of sound

integument, before the artery, vein, and nerves are divided.

114. Lisfranc and many French and continental surgeons recommend

the operation to be done with a pointed, double-edged knife, in the

following manner: The arm being approximated to the trunk, in a state

of half pronation, the point of the knife is to be entered at a

small triangular space, which may be perceived on the inside of the

fullness of the shoulder, bounded above by the scapular extremity of

the clavicle and a small part of the acromion; on the inside, by the

coracoid process; and on the outside, by the head of the humerus. The

knife thus entered obliquely is to be passed across to the outside,

opening in its passage into the joint, when, by sliding the knife

forward over the head of the bone, while the deltoid is raised up by

the operator or an assistant, a flap is to be formed, during which

proceeding the arm is to be raised from the side, to facilitate

its performance. If this flap be well made, the upper part of the

capsular ligament, the tendons of the long head of the biceps, and the

supra-spinatus are divided, and the tendons of the infra-spinatus,

teres minor, and sub-scapularis are also cut through in part, if not

entirely. The upper and posterior flap is thus completed.

In the second step of the operation, the surgeon passes the knife

behind the head of the humerus, and makes the under and anterior or

inner flap, by cutting downward and inward, including in it a very

small portion of the deltoid, the pectoralis major, latissimus dorsi,

teres major, the triceps, coraco-brachialis, the short head of the

biceps, and the vessels and nerves, when the limb is separated from

the body. The flaps are nearly of the same size, and are to be brought

together by sutures.

In the secondary operation, or that done several weeks after the

receipt of the injury, in consequence of the attempt to save the arm

having failed, it should be borne in mind that the soft parts will

often be found so altered and impacted together that they will not

yield or separate; and nothing is gained but by each cut of the knife,

causing thereby some little delay, inconvenience, and loss of time.

115. _Amputation of the arm immediately below the tuberosities of the

humerus_ ought to be done in the following manner: The arm being raised

from the side, and an assistant having compressed, or being ready to

compress, the subclavian artery, the surgeon commences his incision

one or two fingers’ breadth beneath the acromion process, and carries

it to the inside of the arm, below the edge of the pectoral muscle,

then under the arm to the outside, where it is to be met by another

incision, begun at the same spot as the first, below the acromion

process. The integuments, thus divided, are to be retracted, and the

muscular parts cut through, until the bone is cleared as high as the

tuberosities. The artery will be seen at the under part, and should be

pulled out by a tenaculum or spring forceps, and secured as soon as

divided. The bone is best sawn, the surgeon standing on the outside;

the nerves should be cut short, and the flaps brought together by two

or three silk or leaden sutures. There are few or no other vessels to

tie, and the cure is completed in the usual time, while the rotundity

of the shoulder is preserved. This operation is similar to that already

recommended for the amputation at the joint, which in many cases it is

intended to supersede.

116. _Excision of the head of the humerus._--The point governing the

modus operandi of this operation is, and ought to be, the fact that,

under the most favorable state of recovery which can take place, the

shoulder-joint usually becomes so stiff that its ordinary motions may

be considered to be lost. Operative processes which have for their

principal object the sparing of the deltoid muscle are unnecessary,

for, if spared, it is as useless as if it had been cut; and it seems to

have been forgotten that, when cut, it reunites, and becomes nearly as

strong as before it was injured. It is the joint that cannot be moved,

not the muscle which has lost its power. I prefer, therefore, in doing

this operation, in cases of some standing, to make a _short_ crescentic

flap by an incision across the anterior part of the shoulder, as in the

operation of amputation, which, on being turned up, leaves the joint

exposed. The edge of the knife being applied to the head of the bone

in a line below, but immediately under the acromion process, divides

the capsular ligament, and with it the long tendon of the biceps, on

which the arm drops from the socket, or glenoid cavity, and allows the

finger to be introduced, when the three muscles inserted into the great

tuberosity may be cut through, and the sub-scapularis inserted into the

small tuberosity will also be divided. The head of the bone is then

readily brought out, and may be easily detached from any surrounding

connections, and sawn off with little or almost no loss of blood. The

elbow is to be supported, so as to bring the end of the sawn bone in

apposition with the glenoid cavity. The flap may be allowed to unite

with the parts below as soon as it will, the shot-holes, if any, being

in general sufficient to allow of such discharge as may be necessary.

In cases of _recent_ injury, considerable aid will be obtained in

keeping the sawn end of the humerus in apposition with the glenoid

cavity, by not dividing the long tendon of the biceps. This must be

done by dissecting it out of its groove in the humerus, between the

tuberosities, and by cutting through the capsular ligament vertically,

so as to follow it up to its attachment to the upper edge of the

glenoid cavity, when it may be easily drawn aside with a blunt hook,

until the operation has been completed--a proceeding difficult of

accomplishment in old cases of disease or injury, and in them not

necessary nor advisable.

The accompanying sketch shows the head of the humerus of the right

arm or side, with a ball lodged in it, a relic from Inkerman, sent to

me as an especial mark of attention by one of the medical officers

at Scutari, but without the name of the man, the regiment he belonged

to, or the surgeon who performed the operation for its removal. The

following account was wrapped round the bone. It commences a day or two

after the operation was done at Scutari, and shows that the man died

from an affection of the lungs, not uncommon, as was first shown during

the late war, after operations following extensive suppurations:--

[Illustration:

_a._ The head of the humerus sawn off below the tuberosities.

_b._ The ball.

_c c._ Fractures of the head of the bone.]

“Pulse soft, 120. He passed a rather restless night, although he had

another opiate at one A.M., and partially removed the dressings. In

the morning he was better; he took some tea and a little wine with

arrow-root, but was very much depressed in spirits. The wound looked

well, there being less discharge, and of a more healthy character;

no increased inflammation around the wound, but no tendency to union

by the first intention on removal of the stitches. He was put upon

farinaceous diet, with four ounces of wine and beef-tea. He continued

to do well till the evening of the 16th, when he complained of

tightness of the chest and slight cough. Harshness of respiratory

murmur and increased vocal resonance, but no crepitation, could be

detected on the right side on auscultation; he complained also of

pain in the hypogastrium and slight diarrhœa. At bedtime he had a

sedative antimonial draught, after which he rested well, but perspired

profusely. On being particularly questioned, he admitted that he had

had diarrhœa several times since landing at Varna, and had had bloody

stools after the battle of Alma, for which, however, he had never been

off duty; he had also frequently been troubled with cough, and two

of his family, he understood, died of consumption. For two days he

continued to improve in spirits, to take his food better, and the wound

assumed a healthy granulating appearance, but a very small portion

of the end of the humerus appeared white, as if going to necrose. On

the evening of the 18th his breathing was more oppressed, and his

countenance flushed and anxious. On examination of the chest, the

lower two-thirds of the right lung were dull on percussion; bronchial

breathing in the lower half, with crepitation above; in the left lung

loud sub-crepitus; diarrhœa had also supervened during the day, but was

checked for the time by an opiate enema. From this date his strength

gradually sank; the diarrhœa returned again and again, in spite of

repeated opiate enemata and small doses of Dover’s powder with hyd. c.

cretâ. The surface of the wound assumed a less healthy appearance; the

respiration became more labored, and he gradually sank till Saturday,

November the 25th, when he died at half-past ten A.M.

“On examination of the head of the bone, after its removal, there was

found an irregular, rugged cavity in the cancellated tissue, about

an inch long, by half an inch broad, extending nearly transversely

from the smaller to the greater tuberosity, and above the latter a

musket-ball was found deeply imbedded, its external convex surface

being on a level with the articular cartilage. From this several small

fissures radiated over the globular head, and from each end of the

cavity a much deeper one extended round the anatomical neck, separating

the articular portion of the bone, in two-thirds of its circumference,

from the shaft.

“At the post-mortem examination, the surface of the wound looked

black and sloughy near the seat of injury, but more healthy in the

direction of the incisions. A small portion of the end of the humerus

was of a pearly white, in progress of necrosing; but around the shaft,

immediately below this, and in the glenoid cavity, the process of

repair had commenced. Both lungs were found engorged with frothy

serum; the lower two-thirds of the right lung hepatized; traces of

old tubercle in apices of both lungs, with miliary tubercle scattered

throughout the whole substance of the left and upper part of the right.

The whole tract of the colon, from the cæcum to the rectum, presented

traces of ulceration, the ulcers being seldom larger than a split pea,

with hardened, elevated edges; the bases in some instances were formed

by the peritoneum only; generally they were scattered irregularly,

but occasionally they were found in rows corresponding to the long

diameter of the gut. In the rectum the ulceration was more extensive,

in some parts the size of a farthing, the edges very irregular, and the

direction more transverse.” These appearances precisely resemble those

observed during the autopsy in cases of death from consumption, and are

not therefore peculiar to the dysentery under which he had suffered.”

117. Professor B. Langenbeck, in order to save the deltoid muscle,

proposed and practiced the operation in the following manner, during

the Danish war in Sleswick-Holstein, with success in several instances:

Begin the incision through the integuments and deltoid muscle

immediately below the anterior border of the acromion, and continue

it directly downward, over the minor tuberosity of the humerus, to

the extent of four inches. Separate the parts, open the sheath of the

long tendon of the biceps muscle, and draw out and hold it on one side

with a blunt hook. Rotate the arm outward, (_if it will rotate_,) to

facilitate the division of the tendon of the sub-scapularis; then

rotate the arm inward, to aid in the division of the tendons of the

supra-spinatus, infra-spinatus, and teres minor muscles, inserted into

the great tuberosity. Complete the division of the capsular ligament,

push the bone through from below, using the arm as a lever if you can,

and saw it off. No arteries of consequence are wounded.

This operation would not be so easy of execution as is supposed, in

cases in which the head and neck of the humerus are broken from the

shaft; it would be very difficult of execution in old cases in which

the soft parts are so hardened and impacted as to admit of little or no

motion.

The extent to which the shaft of the humerus may be removed with the

head cannot be distinctly defined. The greater the distance, the less

will be the chance of the bone uniting to the glenoid cavity, in such

a manner as to render it a useful limb, whether by the formation of

a ginglymoid joint, or by anchylosis. In the present state of our

knowledge the bone should not be sawn lower than the insertion of the

deltoid muscle. If the arm were preserved by an operation below that

part, it is probable that the bone, however supported, would not become

attached to the glenoid cavity. It might however become useful, by some

artificial help, as has occurred in cases of false joint in the middle

arm, after ununited fractures.

118. Excision of the head of the humerus is not to be done in every

instance of compound fracture of that bone, as the following cases will

show:--

Lieutenant Madden, 52d Regiment, was wounded at the assault of Badajos

in 1812, by a musket-ball, which fractured the head of the humerus,

and lodged in it. The broken pieces were from time to time removed

by incisions, together with the ball, and he ultimately preserved a

very serviceable arm. He is now a very zealous member of the Church of

England.

Robert Masters, 40th Regiment, was wounded at the battle of Toulouse,

on the 12th of April, 1814, by a musket-ball in the right shoulder,

which lodged in the head of the bone. Shown to me a few days afterward

as a case for amputation at the shoulder-joint, I directed the excision

of the head of the bone as soon as the parts became more quiescent.

Under venesection, purgatives, leeches, the constant application of

cold, and low diet, the high inflammatory symptoms which had supervened

subsided, and, six weeks after the accident, the ball, and part of

the head of the humerus, were removed, after an incision had been

made through the external parts for the purpose. Three mouths after

the receipt of the injury, the man was sent to England, with no other

inconvenience than that resulting from the loss of motion in the

shoulder, which was stiff. The use of the forearm was preserved, and a

limited one of the upper arm, by moving the shoulder-bone on the trunk.

Private Oxley, 23d Regiment, was wounded at the battle of Toulouse, in

April, 1814, by a musket-ball, which entered at the anterior edge of

the deltoid muscle, passed across the head of the humerus, injuring

it in its course, and went out near the posterior edge of the muscle,

through which, at its middle part, the deficiency in the rotundity of

the head of the humerus could be distinctly felt. Shown to me a few

days afterward as a slight but peculiar wound, it was marked as a case

for excision, if circumstances should render it necessary. No bad

symptoms, however, supervened; the man only complained of the restraint

put upon him, and the lowness of his diet. Some pieces of bone came

away, or were removed, and in July he was sent to England, the wound

being healed and free from pain; the shoulder stiff. The lower arm he

used as before the accident.

General Lord Seaton suffered from a nearly similar wound, at the taking

of Ciudad Rodrigo, and recovered with a good use of his arm.

These cases were fortunate in their results, but such do not always

follow. Major C. was wounded in one of the battles in the Pyrenees,

in 1813, by a musket-ball, which injured the head of the left humerus

from side to side. Thirty years afterward the wounds still discharged,

and gave him great uneasiness. A probe discovered much diseased bone.

I advised the excision of the head of the bone, to which he would not

assent. His courage had been broken by continued suffering.

Ensign Moore, of the Bengal army, was wounded at Sobraon, on the 10th

February, 1846, by a musket-ball, which passed through the anterior

and inner part of the deltoid muscle, one inch and a half below the

inner part of the acromion process, struck and went through the head of

the bone, which it splintered, and made its exit behind, in front of,

but near the inferior angle of the scapula. He remained in camp three

days, and was sent to hospital at Ferozapore, where he suffered much

from inflammation, pain, etc., and after a month was sent to Subaltro

in the Hills, where some pieces of bone came away, during which time

he suffered severely, and was much weakened by it and the discharge.

On the 20th October, 1846, he was removed to Bunda, in Bundeleund;

here more bone came away, accompanied by much discharge. Thence

he proceeded in April, 1847, to Juanpore, where he suffered three

attacks of inflammation, two of them very severe; the constitutional

disturbance was great. The posterior wound was reopened, and a large

quantity of offensive matter discharged. On the 7th of August, 1847,

the suppuration is stated to have been still great, and the strength

very much reduced, on which account he was recommended to proceed to

Europe. On the 9th June, 1848, the wounds were healed, the last piece

of bone having come away about ten days before. The pieces of bone

are from the head and from the part adjoining. The head of the bone

is greatly diminished in size, so much so as to appear to have been

almost entirely removed; the joint is stiff, if not anchylosed, the

shoulder flat, the under use of the arm perfect, that of the upper

part dependent on the motion of the shoulder-blade. The removal of the

head of the bone, immediately after the receipt of the injury, would

have been the best course to have pursued, for the arm when the cure

took place was not in a better state than it would have been in if the

operation had been performed at first, and the patient would have been

spared two years of great suffering, not unattended with considerable

danger.

M. Baudens, in a very able paper, an extract of which, made by himself,

is published in the “Comptes Rendus” of the French Academy of Sciences,

for February, 1855, on the Resection of the Head of the Humerus, seems

to have overlooked, or not to have seen, the foregoing observations,

as he assumes, as a consequence of his own observations on fourteen

primary cases of which one only died, that the resection of the head of

the humerus ought to be the rule in surgery when a ball has broken this

part, and that amputation of the limb should be the exception--a point

long since settled in my surgical works.

He considers that surgical writers in general have supposed that the

bone remains suspended in the middle of the muscles, which does not

accord with his practice, nor with the remarks made by me on this

subject.

He recommends the following mode of operating: The arm being slightly

turned outward and backward, the point of a small, straight amputating

knife is to be entered on the outside of the coracoid process,

immediately over the head of the humerus; lower the hand and carry the

point of the knife in a straight line for ten or twelve centimeters

downward, always applied to the bone, which serves as a guide.

If the incision thus made should not be large enough to expose the head

of the humerus, a transverse subcutaneous one should be made through

the muscular fibers toward the superior angle. If it be sufficiently

large and open, this is not necessary. The long tendon of the biceps

will be seen at the bottom of the incision, and is to be cut across.

Bring opposite the incision, by rotating the arm, first the great

tuberosity, then the smaller one, in order to divide the four

muscles attached to them. The division of these parts will largely

open the joint, when the elbow being carried backward and upward,

the head of the bone will protrude. Detach gently the periosteum,

slip the chain saw behind and below the head of the bone, so as to

leave the periosteum as much uninjured as possible, doing in fact a

sub-periosteal extirpation.

Tie the vessels, cover the upper end of the humerus with the periosteum

thus saved like a hood, and keep it in contact with the glenoid cavity.

He maintains that when a ball has broken the head of the humerus, if

the removal of the head be not effected, one of three things follows:

the operation is performed subsequently, or the patient dies of

purulent deposits, or recovers with a stiff joint, accompanied by

fistulous openings of a disagreeable nature.

He contends that a ginglymoid joint is always formed by his method,

which enables the sufferer to make much greater use of it than if

the operation were performed in any other way; but it will be very

difficult of performance if the bone should be so much injured as to

prevent the tuberosity following the motion to be given to the elbow,

and is not therefore recommended.

119. If, from some complication of injury, the axillary or other artery

should give way during the treatment, the extremity is not to be

amputated. The artery is to be secured by one ligature applied above

the opening in it and by another below it, the surgeon always bearing

in mind the fact that the proper way to get at the axillary artery is

by cutting _across_ the fibers of the pectoral muscle, and not in their

direction, and that it will be better to amputate the arm than to tie

the subclavian artery above the clavicle.

120. _Amputation of the arm_ by the common circular incision should

only be practiced in the space between the lower edge of the insertion

of the pectoralis major and the elbow-joint; and rarely in cases of

injury from musket-balls. No common flesh-wound, made either by cannon

or musket-shot, even including a division of the artery, absolutely

demands this operation, the bone being uninjured. If, in addition to a

destructive flesh-wound, the bone be broken, or if it be mashed with

the muscles by an oblique stroke of a round shot, or the forearm be

carried away or destroyed, it is admissible. It is to be done in the

following manner: An assistant draws up the integuments with both

hands; another does the same downward, if the parts admit of it; the

forearm is to be moderately bent. The integuments are to be divided

by a circular incision, and retracted. The muscles and vessels are

then to be cut through by one sweep of the knife, if it can be done.

The muscles adhering to the bone are next to be separated from it to

the extent of two inches. The retractor is to be applied, and the

periosteum divided by one circle of the knife around the bone, and

in the circle thus cut the saw is to work until the bone is divided;

attention being paid to the directions already given to saw in a

perpendicular, not slanting direction. The artery or arteries are to be

tied, the surface of the stump cleansed with warm and then with cold

water, and dried. Leaden sutures are useful.

121. Mr. Luke performs the operation by two flaps on the same principle

as in the thigh. There is a close resemblance in the manner of

amputating the arm by the double-flap operation to that adopted for

the amputation of the thigh. The first flap is made posteriorly to the

bone, by transfixing the limb, for which purpose the knife is entered

at the mid-point between the anterior and posterior surfaces, carried

transversely across the limb, and made to cut toward the posterior

surface, in an oblique direction, until all the soft structures are

divided. It is necessary, in entering the knife, to bear in mind that

the bone lies opposite to the mid-point, and that, in carrying the

knife across the limb, it would strike against the surface of the

bone, unless means were adopted for its prevention. This is easily

done by grasping the structures which are to form the posterior flap

between the fingers and thumb of the left hand, and by drawing them

backward during the time the knife is entering at the mid-point and

being carried across the limb. Having formed the posterior flap, the

anterior one is formed as in amputation of the thigh, by cutting inward

from the surface toward the bone with a sweep, which will make this

flap equal in length to the posterior. The operation is completed by

dividing the remaining soft parts by means of a cut carried circularly

around the bone, and by sawing the bone in the line of division. The

after-treatment is the same as in the thigh.

122. _Excision of the elbow-joint._--An incised wound of moderate

extent into the elbow-joint, cutting off with it a part of the condyle

of the humerus, or the head of the radius, or a part of the ulna,

demands the removal of the injured piece of bone only. The forearm

should be bent, and the antiphlogistic treatment fully carried out.

A ball fracturing the olecranon, or other portion of a single bone,

although opening into the joint, does not immediately require any

operation.

If a ball should lodge in the lower part of the humerus, or in either

of its condyles, it should be removed as quickly as possible by the

trephine, or other appropriate instrument.

When the articulating ends of the humerus, radius, and ulna are wholly

or in part injured by a musket-ball, it was formerly the custom to

amputate the arm in such instances of great mischief--an operation

which should be superseded by that of excision of the joint, by which

the forearm will be saved, and considerable use of it retained.

To perform this operation, a straight, strong-pointed knife is to

be pushed into the joint behind, immediately above but close to the

olecranon process, and exactly at its inner edge, to avoid the ulnar

nerve, which lies between it and the inner condyle, to which it may

be considered to be affixed. The incision thus begun is to be carried

outwardly to the external part of the humerus, dividing the insertion

of the triceps. At each end of this transverse cut an incision is to

be made upward and downward for about two inches each way, the three

resembling the letter =H=. The flaps thus made being turned up and

down, the olecranon should be sawn across, together with the great

sigmoid cavity and the coronoid process of the ulna, the insertion

of the brachialis internus having been previously separated from the

coronoid process. Before this is done, the ulnar nerve should be

separated with its attachments from the inner condyle, and turned

aside to avoid injury. The joint being now fully exposed, the head

of the radius may be sawn off or cut through with the strong spring

scissors if possible, above the tubercle into which the biceps tendon

is inserted. The extremity of the humerus should next be pushed through

the wound, and the broken end sawn off, a spatula or other thin

solid substance being placed underneath it, to prevent the brachial

artery or median nerve being injured. Any hemorrhage which there may

be having ceased, the forearm is to be bent, the bones are to be

placed in apposition, and the incisions approximated by sutures and

sticking-plaster, duly supported by compress and bandage, so that

union may take place if possible, particularly of the transverse wound

first made. The arm should be supported by a sling, and dressed early,

as the shot-hole or holes must remain open and discharging. Some motion

of the new joint to be formed may be expected under gentle passive

movements; but as a stiff joint cannot always be avoided, the arm

should be kept bent.

123. _Amputation of the elbow-joint_ has been recommended, but not

frequently performed. It may be done in any way by which good covering

can be obtained, and it has been supposed that the long stump thus

made is more useful if the olecranon process be sawn across, and left

with the triceps attached to it, than if it be removed. When the parts

are sound, a flap may be made in front by introducing a straight,

double-edged knife over the outer condyle, and carrying it across and

through the soft parts over the opposite or inner condyle, when by

cutting downward and outward a flap is to be formed of from three to

four fingers’ breadth in length. A shorter flap is to be made behind,

when both are to be raised, and the bleeding vessels previously

secured, the external lateral ligament being divided. The radius is to

be separated from the humerus, when the olecranon may be sawn across,

or, if the arm be bent, separated from the humerus without difficulty.

The flaps are to be brought together and retained in the usual manner.

124. _Amputation of the forearm_ is seldom required after wounds from

musket-balls. The bones can be readily got at, and large pieces removed

with ease. The arteries can be cut down upon and secured without

difficulty, except at the upper part, and even there with some little

sacrifice of muscular parts, which are not to be spared. The fascia

may be divided freely in every direction, and as mortification from

defect of nourishment rarely takes place in the fingers, as it does in

the toes, when the great arteries of the limb have been injured, every

effort should be made to save a forearm, however badly it may at first

appear to be injured.

The flap operation is to be preferred to the circular, particularly

when done a little above the wrist; to which operation Baron Larrey

and the surgeons of France particularly objected during the late war.

Having done it most successfully since 1806, however, it is recommended

as preferable to any other, even when the injury admits of its being

done neat the carpus. When the nature of the injury does not admit of

two equal flaps being formed, it must be done by two unequal ones, or

even by one, it being important for the fixing of an artificial hand or

other help to have a long stump.

The arm being placed and held firmly in the intermediate position

between pronation and supination, with the thumb uppermost, so that the

radius and ulna are in one line, a sharp-pointed straight knife is to

be entered close to the inner edge of the radius, and brought out below

at the inner edge of the ulna. It is then to be carried forward for

half an inch, and made to cut its way out with a gentle inclination, so

as to form a semicircular flap. Re-entered at the same point as before,

a similar flap is to be made on the outside, the position of the bones

being a little altered to admit of its easy execution. The two flaps

are to be turned back; the tendon of the supinator radii longus, and

all other tendinous, muscular, or interosseous fibers, not cut through,

are then to be divided, and the linen retractor run between the bones,

which are to be sawn across at the same time. All pressure being taken

off, the tendons and the vessels, if long, are to be cut short, and the

arteries to be tied, after which the flaps are to be brought together

by sutures, and retained by sticking-plaster, compress, and bandage.

125. When the operation is to be performed above the middle of the arm,

it may be done by the _circular_ incision.

The arm being placed with the thumb uppermost, an assistant should

retract the integuments as much as possible, while the operator makes

a circular incision through them. They are then to be drawn up for

nearly an inch. The muscles on the inside of the arm should be divided

by one slanting cut to the bones; then those on the outside. The bones

are to be cleared by cutting through any muscular fibers attached to

them, when the interosseal ligament should be divided, and the linen

retractor passed between the bones, which may be sawn through at the

same time without difficulty. The stump is to be dressed in the usual

manner. The operation may be done by cutting through the integuments

and muscles at once in an oblique manner, until the flaps thus formed

shall be sufficiently large to make a thick cushion over the ends of

the bones.

126. _Amputation at the wrist_, or the joint of the radius and ulna

with the first row of the bones of the carpus, has been recommended

by some surgeons as preferable to amputation above the ends of the

radius and ulna. The hand being placed midway between pronation and

supination, the soft parts are to be divided by a circular incision

beginning from half an inch to an inch below the ends of the radius and

ulna. The integuments being turned up without the tendons, they are

to be divided, and the joint is to be opened into before the spinous

process of the radius; and, while the hand is pressed down, the knife

should divide all the soft parts, and separate the carpus from the

radius and ulna. The wound is to be closed by sutures in the usual

manner. When a circular incision cannot be made, in consequence of the

nature of the injury, and this operation is still preferred, a covering

for the bones must be obtained wherever it can be procured, by one or

more flaps.

127. _In all injuries of the hand_, the value of a thumb and a finger,

or of two fingers, or even of one, should be borne in mind, and no part

should be removed that can be saved, and appears likely to be of use.

When cannon-shot, large splinters of shells, or grape-shot have struck

the hand, amputation will often be necessary; but the foregoing precept

should never be forgotten.

A musket-ball fairly passing through the hand generally fractures two

metacarpal bones, although a small ball may pass between them without

breaking either. The wounds should be enlarged, and the broken ends of

the bone sawn off, or the splinters removed, and the points of bone

smoothed off, the tendons to be carefully preserved, and vigorous

antiphlogistic measures adopted. The tendency to tetanus or trismus

will be best obviated by such measures, the incisions, when necessary,

being made in the direction of the bones and tendons. Any hemorrhage

which can ensue will be readily commanded by ligature, by torsion of

the vessel, or by a small graduated compress and bandage, when those

are inapplicable. Injuries by musket-balls to the metacarpal bones

rarely take place without implicating one or more flexor or extensor

tendons, and the consequence is that the fingers to which they belong

are often bent inward toward the palm, constituting a defect less

inconvenient, however, than if the finger remained straight and

immovable.

128. When one or more fingers are destroyed, and the metacarpal bones

injured, they are to be sawn or cut off, but not removed at the carpus,

although an opening into the joint of the carpus will generally do

well, if skin can be saved to cover it. In all cases of amputation of

one or more fingers, the metacarpal bones, if injured, should be left

as long as possible, and particularly that of the index finger, when

the thumb remains. In all cases it is better, if possible, to leave

the heads of the metacarpal bones in their places, rather than open

into the joint of the carpus, if it can be avoided. If the articulating

heads must come out, a strong, thin scalpel is to be pushed in between

the bones, the ligaments cut through above, below, and at the sides,

and care should be taken, in removing one or two of these bones, not

to dislocate the others, and the joint should be covered by a flap or

flaps made for the purpose, the sides of the remaining fingers being

covered in a similar manner. This succeeds admirably, when the two

outer bones and fingers only are taken away.

129. _The phalanges_ of the fingers may be removed by making a flap

from the upper or under part, or from both, or from the sides. The

square flap from the upper part of the finger is preferable, when the

joint with the metacarpal bone is to be operated upon, the commencing

points of the flap being united by a transverse incision on the

under part of the joint. It should be recollected, that in all these

excisions the larger end of bone belongs to that which is not removed,

as may be shown by bending the finger; and that the ligamentous

attachment between the metacarpal bones, connecting a middle one to

its fellows on each side, should be cut through, when the joint will

be easily dislocated. Attention should be paid to the division of the

lateral ligaments, in the removal of any of the bones of the fingers.

Professor B. Langenbeck has operated in some instances, and he says

successfully, without the loss of the finger, by sawing off, in his

first case, the articulating ends of the first phalanx and of the

metacarpal bone of the forefinger, in consequence of an injury from

a rotating piece of machinery; in another, the ends of the first and

second phalanges of the middle finger after a severe laceration; and in

a third case, by sawing off the end of the second phalanx, and removing

the whole of the bone of the third of the forefinger from the soft

parts, leaving the nail; the man recovering with a shortened but useful

finger. In all these cases the flexor and extensor tendons were from

the first uninjured.

M. Langenbeck has also removed the metacarpal bone of the thumb in the

following manner: “An incision is to be made along the whole length of

the bone toward the palmar aspect, thus avoiding the tendons. Then free

both articulating extremities, separate the soft parts from the body

of the bone, which is to be drawn outward by a strong pair of forceps,

with two bent points or teeth at each extremity. To prevent the

shortening or drawing inward of the thumb, it is to be kept straight

and duly extended by a splint and other apparatus.” He recommends, with

Flourens, the preservation of as much as possible of the periosteum,

and uses for its detachment a small curved knife with a square end.

Separating the periosteum from the bone is more easily directed than

done. Professor Quekett, at my request, made some trials on the humerus

to ascertain the point, and found that the periosteum could not be

separated from the cartilaginous covering of the head of the bone, in

the manner proposed, although it could be done by scraping half an inch

below the insertion of the capsular ligament, and a sufficient portion

saved to cover the sawn end of the bone, in the manner recommended by

M. Baudens.

Commentaries on the Surgery of the War in Portugal, Spain, France, and the Netherlands from the battle of Roliça, in 1808, to that of Waterloo, in 1815; with additions relating to those in the Crimea in 1854-55, showing the improvements made during and since that period in the great art and science of surgery on all the subjects to which they relate. · 第 61 / 129 题