FOOTNOTES:

[58] 'Mark Boyd's Reminiscences of Fifty Years.'

[59] Disraeli.

[60] Mathias.

[61] Rogers.

[62] Tytler's 'England under Edward VI. and Mary,' 1839, vol. i., p.

48.

ART. VI.--_Wesley and Wesleyanism_.

(1.) _The Life and Times of the Rev. John Wesley, M.A., Founder of the

Methodists_. By the Rev. L. TYERMAN. 3 vols. Hodder and Stoughton.

(2.) _The Life and Times of the Rev. Samuel Wesley, M.A., Rector of

Epworth, and Father of the Rev. John and Charles Wesley_. By the Rev.

L. TYERMAN. Simpkin and Marshall.

(3.) _John Wesley and the Evangelical Reaction of the Eighteenth

Century_. By JULIA WEDGEWOOD. Macmillan and Co.

(4.) _The Poetical Works of John and Charles Wesley_. Vols. I.--XI.

Methodist Book Room.

(5.) _John Wesley's Place in Church History_. Bell and Daldy.

(6.) _Wesley and Methodism_. By ISAAC TAYLOR. Bell and Daldy.

(7.) _John Wesley: His Life and His Work_. By the Rev. M. LELIÈVRE.

Translated from the French by the Rev. A. J. FRENCH, B.A. Wesleyan

Conference Office.

(8.) _John Wesley; or, the Theology of Conscience_, By the author of

the 'Philosophy of Evangelicism.' Bell and Daldy.

Protestantism has never shown any especial pride in its hagiology, it

does not treasure very highly the lives of its saints; yet it has an

illustrious succession of eminent and noble men--great by endurance

and self-denial, by the majesty and multiplicity of their labours, by

the fervent enthusiasm of their character, and by their exalted

intercourse with divine truths and things. Among the most eminent of

these lives, great by its endowments and virtues, transcendent by

incessant and immeasurable activity, extraordinary by its protracted

period of service, stands that of John Wesley, mild and modest, but

conspicuous and renowned, alike in the Old World and the New. Shall we

be doing a needless thing if we devote some pages to an attempt at an

estimate of the man, his ideas, his work, and his influence? First,

the man. Pleasant, it has been said, is the task to trace up to their

mountain source the streams which, broadening into great rivers,

descend to run among the hills and water the valleys; to drink at the

fountain-head, where perhaps all seems bleak and drear, compared with

the fertility through which the river wanders below; thus, also, it is

pleasant to trace some great benevolent flood of influence and thought

back to its obscure fountain, its unlikely, perhaps unsuspected,

spring. Thus also it is that in the kitchen of a poorly furnished

Lincolnshire parsonage, in its atmosphere of poverty and piety,

Methodism really had its origin; the early life of its founder was

lightened by its special providences, his sense of wonder was excited

by its supernatural voices, his frame was nourished by its hard

discipline. Such was the cradle and the early aliment of John Wesley;

and the first element in Methodism is the quality and character of the

man.

Even at this day, Epworth is a quiet old village town, lying on the

windy side of a Lincolnshire upland; no railway has, we believe,

disturbed its solitary stillness, and the rest of its inhabitants is

unbroken by the shrill whistle of the locomotive. We may figure to

ourselves its loneliness a hundred and seventy years since, when in

its old parsonage John Wesley's eyes first opened to the light. Samuel

Wesley, his father, was the rector of the little village; quite a

notable man to us, and by no means an obscure man in his day. Epworth,

considering those times, was not a poor living, it was worth £200 a

year; it is now worth nearly £1,000; but excellent and admirable man

as he appears to have been, the old rector was usually in debts and

difficulties. Perhaps even Goldsmith's typical clergyman would not

have 'passed rich with £40 a year,' if, in addition to that wealth, he

had found his quiver filled by nineteen children; although we know

wonderful Robert Walker became a rich man, kept out of debt and

danger, and accumulated a fortune in his incumbency of Seathwait on an

annual income of £10! Few well-authenticated stories are more romantic

than that of Epworth parsonage; among old houses it has a

distinguished pre-eminence. Both the pastor and his wife were

extraordinary people: on both sides their ancestors were remarkable,

and they in turn became parents of an offspring, marvellous not merely

in number, but in the singular versatility of their genius. The old

rector was one of the stupendous scholars, of whom there were so many

in the lone and obscure retreats of village life in that age; one of

those men who, patiently trimming the midnight lamp, or kindling it

before the earliest glow of the summer's sunbeam, thought or wrote

with equal facility in Hebrew, Greek, or Latin, and published their

works in huge quartos or folios. Of him probably we should now know

nothing, but for the work of his remarkable children. Yet he was

himself a huge folio of a man, a poet, too, in virtue of a

considerable power of conception, fertility of illustration, and

melody of expression; those queer old volumes, the 'Athenian Oracle,'

which are a choice amusement and recreation for the bookworm, received

large contributions, and on the most curious subjects, from his pen:

he possessed a nimble wit, and his posthumous work on Job is said to

contain--for it has never fallen in our way--a vast wealth of

scholarship. Susannah Wesley, his wife, was at once a saint and a

scholar, far more equal to the discussion of many knotty matters in

divinity than some of the bishops of that day; and she also had an

intense concern for the souls of the parishioners round about her. The

household of that parsonage vividly reflects that old twilight time.

Twice the rectory was consumed by fire: it was supposed to be the work

of incendiaries, for the rector was very unpopular, and the story has

often been told in prose and in painting, how, on one of these

occasions, the infant John nearly perished in the flames, how he was

rescued, and how the brave rector knelt with his children on the

village green, exclaiming, 'Come, neighbours, let us kneel down, let

us give thanks to God, He has given me all my eight children--I am

rich enough.' But in the fire he lost not only his house, but his

furniture and his precious library, all his manuscripts, and his

sermons, and moreover a work on Hebrew poetry, which, from what we

know of his pen, must have been very valuable. Grim shadows often fell

over the rectory. One circumstance gives it a most singular notoriety,

and was probably not without influence on the mind of John. We allude

to its celebrated ghost. Among ghost stories, this of the apparition

or _polter-geisterie_ of Epworth--for the hauntings were noisy

racketings rather than appearances--has always been held to be one of

the most inexplicable. Dr. Southey quite inclines to a belief in the

genuineness of the ghostly visitations, and Mr. Tyerman expresses

himself as reluctantly driven to the conclusion that the noises and

other circumstances were occasioned by the direct and immediate agency

of some unseen spirit; Isaac Taylor also seems forced to a similar

admission. Thus it was a singular old house and household; much there

was calculated in every way to stir the souls of such children and

youths as John and Charles Wesley, not to mention the less famous, but

scarcely less ingenious, Samuel and Mehetabel, Amelia and Keziah; it

is interesting to think of that family in those old Epworth fields and

lanes and hedgerows, and to follow them in all their strange, varied,

and parti-coloured existence.

In due time, John left home for college; he studied at Christ-church,

Oxford, after he had fulfilled his earlier course at the Charter

House. It was long before he found his way into the work which has

made his name so eminent; nor can it be said that in earlier life he

gave much promise of that especial excellence to which he attained. He

was a hard and industrious student, an exemplary and pious youth and

young man. It is not uninteresting to notice that at this time he had

rather a close and not unaffectionate correspondence with Mary

Granville, then a young widow, which suggests suspicious

possibilities. Talented, beautiful, and accomplished, we know her

principally as the old lady, Mrs. Delany, the cherished friend of

George III., to whom he paid such courtly and beautiful deference in

her old age at Windsor. Mr. Tyerman seems to think, and we think too,

that Wesley had a 'fair escape;' that he was not at all uninteresting

to the fair widow is certain. What would have become of Methodism had

the intimacy been closer? He was elected a fellow of Lincoln College,

Oxford; but his ideas of Christian truth appear to have been very

crude and confused. In his twenty-fifth year he was ordained a priest

of the Church of England, and ministered for some time at a wretched

little Lincolnshire village called Wroote; the population was under

three hundred, 'and the people,' says Mehetabel Wesley, 'were as dull

as asses and impervious as stone.' It is true there was at this time a

small cluster of Oxford students who had received the denomination of

'Methodists,' and Wesley was one of them; he was called even the

'Curator of the Holy Club,' and a 'crack-brained enthusiast.' His

brother Charles regarded him with reverence, and all looked up to him

as the worthy leader of the little band. He appears to have led the

life of an ascetic, and his charity to the poor was limited only by

his very scanty means. An instance shows us something of the character

of the man. On one cold winter day, a young girl, whom these earlier

Methodists kept at school, called upon him in a state nearly frozen.

The young man said to her, 'You seem half-starved; have you nothing to

wear but that linen gown?' She said, 'Sir, it is all I have!' Wesley

felt in his pocket, but it was almost empty; the walls of his chamber,

however, were hung with pictures, and these now seemed to him to

become his accusers. 'It struck me,' says he, 'will thy Master say to

thee, "Well done, good and faithful steward, thou hast adorned thy

walls with the money which might have screened this poor creature from

the cold." O justice! O mercy! are not these pictures the blood of

this poor maid?' When he had reached the age of seventy-three, the

Commissioners of Excise--in all generations a race of monetary

ferrets--addressed to him a circular, expressing that beyond a doubt

he had neglected to make a proper entry and return of his silver

plate. The letter was very curt and peremptory. Wesley evidently

thought the application to him was ridiculous, and he replied in a

note still more curt. 'Sir, I have two silver spoons at London and two

at Bristol; this is all the plate that I have at present, and I shall

not buy any more while so many round me want bread. I am, Sir, your

most humble servant, John Wesley.' Thus the reflection of the young

student realized itself in the active life of the old man.

For some time, however, John Wesley appears before us as a kind of

eighteenth century Puseyite, or rather such an one as Hurrell Froude;

his notions were cast in a mould of High Church idealism, not unmixed

with a certain morbid pietism; and Oxford Methodism almost anticipates

that other mighty reaction, the great religious movement of our age;

but the Methodism of Oxford, indeed, although it numbered among its

adherents such men as the Wesleys, and Whitefield, and Hervey, and

Ingram, soon came to an end, and, but for Wesley's after career, would

have been buried in oblivion, for Mr. Tyerman truly characterizes it

as 'misty, austere, gloomy, and forbidding, while yet intensely

earnest, sincere, and self-denying.'

The friends were soon widely scattered to their different vicarages

and curacies, and John Wesley himself--now in his thirty-second

year--accepted a mission to the little American State of Georgia. We

need not describe his experience in America further than to remark

how, on his way thither, he fell in with Moravians, who imparted to

him some new light in theology on its experimental side. The vigorous

hymns of the Moravians and their vivid representations of Christian

life, put before him a new set of ideas, which, when he separated

himself entirely from the organization of that sect and returned to

England, bore abundant fruit. His life in Georgia was of short

continuance, but characterized by singular circumstances; first and

foremost, he took into his ministry a very strange, morose, and

cheerless type of Christianity; also in connection with this, we have

to notice a very important item in his history--he fell in love. It is

quite remarkable that all Wesley's transactions with womankind--on

his own account--were unfortunate, even exceedingly unhappy. The lady

who first drew forth his affections appears to have accepted his

proposal of marriage; but by a rapid transition we find her a week or

two after, married to a Mr. Williamson; this overwhelmed the poor

priest, and introduced him to other troubles. He refused to admit her

to the Lord's table; then we find him arrested and brought before the

recorder for defaming the lady; then followed a stream of indictments

against him, and, in brief, sick and sore, and as a prisoner at large,

we find him hurrying away from the colony.

For a life which became so remarkable for the prescience and rigidity

of its principles, such a commencement was very singular. A strange

undeterminateness appears to rule, or rather to leave him unruled and

ungoverned, until his thirty-seventh year. It is singular, for

instance, to find an undoubtedly pious, earnest, holy, and

self-denying man, such as Wesley was, declaring that until he returned

from Georgia he was an unconverted man. He was no doubt in search of

that deep faith which is eternal life. It appears that a real change

came over him when he heard the preaching of Peter Bohler, the

Moravian; in all these earlier years of Wesley's activity he seems to

have been greatly indebted to the Moravians. The issue of the

influence of Bohler upon his mind, was his confession that before this

period he was a servant of God, accepted and safe, but now he knew it,

and was happy as well as safe, and in after years and until our own

time, the conscious happiness of believers has been a considerable

point in Methodist teaching. There is no doubt that Wesley himself

attained a cheerful, quiet, restful consciousness he had never known

before, and his life hereafter, while constant in its course of

self-denial, was lifted above the morose asceticism of his earlier

years. But as to the principle itself, it is surely as dangerous as a

rule of Christian experience, as it is doubtful in all human

philosophy. For some time he was materially influenced by Moravian

principles and practices, and, indeed, it is easy to see that God who

destined for his distinguished servant a very long life, was teaching

him in various schools those principles, which upon an eminently large

scale he was to apply. He went to Germany to visit the Moravian

settlement of Hernhutt, he came to know that eminent and extraordinary

man, Christian David, he heard him preach and received from his own

lips his singular story. He professed himself to have received

remarkable spiritual intelligence from Moravian teachings; and some of

the finest hymns in the Wesleyan Hymn Book are translations made at

this time by John Wesley from those of Count Zinzendorf. But it is

very remarkable that he signalized the period of his conversion by a

quarrel with William Law; he charged him most ungraciously with having

deceived him in having given to him a mystical, notional, and

intellectual faith; and Law replied to him in language, which

assuredly in every way leaves that devout and eminent Christian

philosopher in possession of the field. It is, however, the last

ground of serious exception we can take to the life of Wesley. At this

point, his life seems to collect itself into eminent purpose and

consistency. He was soon compelled to disentangle himself from the

Moravians, whose notions at that time were beset by the most mystical

and mischievous fancies, and ridiculous and even indecent allusions.

He was forbidden their pulpit on account of his clearly expressed

dissent from their doctrines, and almost immediately, and apparently

without any distinctly marked design on his own part, he commenced

that course which made him so pre-eminent a father and apostle in the

modern church. John Wesley's course is very singular. It has this

strong mark of eminent honesty: that the whole of the immense system

of usefulness he inaugurated, appears to have been without especial

intention or plan. From year to year the institution grew; piece by

piece, the mighty structure took proportion and shape. Commencing in a

simple design to be useful, to awaken men to a knowledge of sin, and

to the determination of salvation from sin, Wesley became an

evangelist. He had no idea of separating himself from the Established

Church; he always regarded himself as one of its ministers, and was

sufficiently filled, even to the close of his life, with all the ideas

implied in being an ordained priest in its communion. It is impossible

to regard him in relation to England at that time, without feeling

that he, in an eminent degree, was raised up and set apart for the

salvation of his country.

The social condition of England, when Wesley appeared presents no

attractive picture to the student; in some measure it relieves and

lightens our despondency concerning England at present, to remember

what the country was then. It is true the population was small, almost

insignificant, as compared with our present overcrowded masses--it was

not more than about six millions--but with abundant wealth and means

of happiness, the people fell far short of what we should now consider

comfort. This was, however, a slight shade in the picture; there were

cruelty and injustice in the administration of English law, life and

liberty were held very cheap, deism or atheism in religion and a wild

licentiousness and rude brutality of manners, pervaded all classes,

from the court to the meanest hamlet of the land. For the most part

the Church of England had shamefully forgotten and neglected her duty,

while the Nonconformists had sunk generally into so cold an

indifferentism in devotion, and so hard and sceptical a frame of

thought in theology, that almost every interest of the land was given

over to profligacy or recklessness, and in thoughtful minds to

despair. Those who called themselves Christians were for the most part

spiritually dead. The literature of England suffered a temporary

eclipse, and such as it was, it was shamefully perverted from all high

purposes, and was very generally adverse to all purity and moral

dignity. The gaols, indeed, were crammed with culprits, but that did

not prevent the heaths from swarming with highwaymen, and the cities

with burglars; in the remote regions of England, such as Cornwall in

the West, and Yorkshire and Northumberland in the North, and

especially Midland Staffordshire, the manners were wild and savage

beyond all description or conception. The reader must conceive a state

of society divested of all the educational, philanthropic and

benevolent activities of modern times. There were no Sunday-schools

and few day-schools; here and there a solitary chapel sequestered in

some lane, either in the metropolis or the country town, or more

probably far away from a town, stood in some confluence of roads a

monument of old intolerance; but religion was, as we have said, in

fact dead or lying in a trance. To few men has it been given,

commencing a career at the age of thirty-seven, to have reserved for

them yet, upwards of half-a-century of health, strength, and mental

vigour, to carry out and give effect to all their plans. Wesley rose

to break up this monotony, and to alarm this depravity of social life;

his strong, clear voice sounded over the land; the amount of hatred,

hostility and persecution which he roused, evidently showed the living

feeling he had created; it is a more favourable circumstance that a

man should hate religion than be wholly indifferent to it; on the

other hand, the love was more fervid and intense than the hate, hate

roared and hissed, and threw about its mischievous display of foolish

fireworks in the shape of pamphlets and satires; but there would

appear to have been such a degree of genuine sympathy, that men and

women, united by certain principles of faith, statedly met together,

regardless of peril or cost, and thus there gradually extended over

the whole of England a circle of religious societies bearing Wesley's

name.

The Church of England very soon set itself against the new movement;

Whitefield, much younger than Wesley, an ardent, flaming, seraphic

man, had been compelled to betake himself to the fields. Like Wesley

he was an ordained minister of the Church, but he had been threatened

with suspension and expulsion, and he was the first who could collect

thousands--sometimes not less than twenty thousand--to hear the

gospel. It was with great fear and trembling that Wesley imitated him,

and he says, referring to his first preaching in the open air near

Bristol, 'I could scarcely reconcile myself at first to this strange

way of preaching in the fields; having been all my life, till very

lately, so tenacious of every point relating to decency and order,

that I would have thought the saving of souls almost a sin if it had

not been done in church.' 'Such,' says Mr. Tyerman, 'were the

prejudices and feelings of the man who for between fifty or sixty

years proved himself the greatest outdoor preacher that ever lived.'

It does not seem very easy to settle the precise etymology of the term

Methodist, whether derived, as some have said, from an allusion in

Juvenal to a celebrated quack physician, or whether, as Mr. Tyerman

seems to think, first used in a pamphlet attacking Whitefield in the

earlier years of his ministry, in which the author fetches up an old

sentence from the pages of Chrysostom, who says, 'To be a Methodist is

to be beguiled.' We ourselves happened once, in a parish church in

Huntingdonshire, to be listening to a clergyman notorious alike by his

private character and vehement intolerance, who was entertaining his

audience on a week evening by a discourse from the text in Ephesians

iv. 14. 'Whereby they lie in wait to deceive.' He said to his people,

'Now you do not know Greek; I know Greek, and I am going to tell you

what this text really says; it says, "they lie in wait to make you

Methodists;" the word used here is _methodeian_, that is really the

word that is used, and that is really what Paul said, "they lie in

wait to make you Methodists." A Methodist means a deceiver, one who

deludes, cheats and beguiles.' The Grecian scholar was a little at

fault in his next allusion, for he proceeded to quote that other

passage of the apostle, 'We are not ignorant of his devices,' and

seemed to be under the impression that 'device' was the same word as

that on which he had expended his criticism. 'Now,' said he, 'you may

be ignorant because you do not know Greek, but "_we_ are not ignorant

of his devices," that is, of his _methods_, his deceivers, that is his

Methodists.' It was a piece of the richest criticism we ever remember

to have heard in any pulpit. In such empty wit and ignorant punning,

it is very likely, however, that the term had its origin; be that as

it may, 'Methodist' soon became the designation of a really large body

of social and spiritual reformers, and assuredly no term has obtained

greater renown and importance since 'the disciples were first called

Christians at Antioch;' but in fact the word is to be found in several

places in our obsolete English. Wesley was not the greatest outdoor

preacher that ever lived, but we can forgive Mr. Tyerman for thinking

so in his high feeling of admiration for his illustrious hero. He

became a power in the country. Earl Stanhope in his very interesting

'History of England from 1713-1783,' devotes a lengthy chapter to

Wesley and the rise of Methodism, and says, 'with less immediate

importance than war or political changes, it endures long after, not

only the result, but the memory of these has passed away, and

thousands who never heard of Fontenoy or Walpole continue to hold the

precepts and venerate the name of John Wesley.' Thus this venerable

name is a distinguished landmark or milestone in the history of the

mind of England. By his labours he gave the noblest freedom to

thousands of enslaved minds, and marshalled their wild natures under

the principles of order and obedience. Wesley achieved his greatest

victories in the open air; he probably inherited from his father a

tolerably sharp power of satiric reproof, which often served him well

in such encounters as he would be sure to have in the broad streets or

the fields, and was well illustrated in his victory over Beau Nash.

The accomplished rake and dandy king of Bath, master of the ceremonies

in that then famous watering-place, appeared swaggering in his

enormous white hat, and asked, 'By what authority he dared to do what

he was doing now?' 'By the authority of Jesus Christ, conveyed to me

by him who is now Archbishop of Canterbury, when he laid his hands

upon me and said, "Take thou authority to preach the Gospel."' Cried

the man of Bath, 'Your preaching frightens people out of their wits.'

'Sir,' said Wesley 'did you ever hear me preach?' 'No!' 'How then can

you judge of what you have never heard?' 'I judge, he answered, 'from

common report.' 'Common report,' replied Wesley, 'is not enough; give

me leave to ask, Sir, is not your name Nash?' 'It is,' he said. 'Sir,'

replied Wesley, 'I dare not judge _of you_ by common report.' Even the

unblushing master of ceremonies was abashed and worsted; he was

slinking away, when, to complete his discomfiture, an old woman lifted

up her voice, and begged Wesley to allow her to question and to answer

him; this made the scene ludicrous, and in the midst of such a

singular and disgraceful defeat, the mighty dandy left the preacher to

continue and to close his sermon.

The most romantic lives of the saints of the Roman Catholic calendar

do not present a more startling succession of incidents than those

which meet us in the life and labours of Wesley and his Prætorian

band, and these are all the more marvellous and romantic because they

lay no tax upon credulity and never appeal to miracle as their

foundation. Wesley never, like blessed St. Raymond of Pennafort,

spread his cloak upon the sea to transport him across the water,

sailing one hundred and sixty miles in six hours, and entering his

convent through closed doors; nor do we ever find him, like the dear

and judicious Xavier, spending three whole days in two different

places at the same time, preaching all the while. We fear it is true

that Wesley does not shine in feats like these, but he seems almost

ubiquitous, and moves with a rapidity which reminds us of that flying

angel who had 'the everlasting gospel to preach;' while his conflicts

with the tempests of nature, and those wilder tempests caused by the

passions of men, crowd his life with incident. We read of adventurous

journeys through regions in the North of England when snowstorms

drifted and baulked the way, and made travelling almost impossible, or

over roads made like glass by the hard frost, and through pathless

wastes of white. Thus we read of his travelling through the long

wintry hours, two hundred and eighty miles, on horseback in six days,

a wonderful feat, and Wesley himself writes,--'Many a rough journey

have I had before, but one like this I never had, between wind and

hail and rain and snow and ice, and driving sleet and piercing cold;

but it has passed, and those days will return no more, and are

therefore as though they had never been. So "the love of Christ

constrained him."' Vast concourses met him in singular places: on

Blackheath fourteen thousand people, in Kingswood more, in Moorfields

and on Kennington Common twenty thousand people. Singular was his

visit to Epworth, where he found the church of his childhood, his

father's church, and the church of his own first ministrations, closed

against him, but for eight days he stayed, and preached every night

standing on his father's tomb; truly a singular sight, the living son,

the prophet of his age, surely little short of inspired, preaching on

the dead father's grave, with such pathos and power as we may well

conceive. 'I am well assured,' he says, 'that I did far more good to

my Lincolnshire parishioners by preaching three days on my father's

tomb, than I did by preaching three years in his pulpit.' Visiting

York, he went to the service of St. Saviour's Gate church; the rector,

the Rev. Mr. Cordeux, had warned his congregation against hearing that

'vagabond Wesley' preach. Wesley went into the church in his

canonicals, it was not unusual for ministers then to wear the cassocks

or the gown like the university man in a university town: the rector

of course saw he was a clergyman, but not knowing who he was, offered

him his pulpit to preach, and Wesley was thoroughly willing and ready.

He took for his text a part of the gospel of the day--sermons leaped

impromptu from his lips and heart; this sermon was an impressive one,

and after the service the rector asked the clerk if he knew who the

strange clergyman was. 'Sir,' said the clerk, 'it was the "vagabond

Wesley" against whom you warned us.' 'Ay, indeed!' said the

astonished rector, 'we have been trapped, but never mind, we have had

a good sermon.' The Dean of York heard of the affair, and threatened

to lay the matter before the archbishop; but the rector outstripped

the dean, and went himself and told the story to the archbishop. 'You

did quite right,' he said, and so the matter ended; only when the

'vagabond Wesley' came to York again, the rector offered his church

the second time to him, and a second time be preached in St.

Saviour's.

A succession of persecutions attended him and his followers on their

way, and yet very little could be alleged to their discredit. In

Cornwall, Edward Greenfield, a tanner, with a wife and seven children,

was arrested under a warrant signed by Dr. Borlase, the eminent

antiquarian, who was a bitter foe to Methodism. Wesley appeared to

vindicate his friend, and he first inquired what objection there was

to the peaceable, inoffensive man. The answer was, 'The man is well

enough in other things, but the gentlemen cannot bear his impudence;

why, Sir, he says that he knows his sins are forgiven!' When

Bernardine of Sienna preached at Bologna, the people brought out their

dice-tables and burnt them in the streets; when Antony of Padua

preached at Pavia, he saw impure books and pictures committed to

immense flames; and even more remarkable, when Savonarola preached in

Florence, the woman left off painting their faces, and decorating

their hair. The results of Wesley's preaching were scarcely less

remarkable. The story is well known how in one place a whole

waggon-load of Methodists had been taken before a magistrate, but when

he asked what they had done, a deep silence fell over the court, for

no one was very well prepared with any charge against them; at length

some one exclaimed that 'they pretended to be better than other

people, and prayed from morning till night;' and another said, 'They

have _convarted_ my wife; till she went among them she had such a

tongue, but now she's as quiet as a lamb.' 'Take them back, take them

back,' said the sensible magistrate, 'and let them convert all the

scolds in the town.' We are amazed when we attempt to realize all the

causeless conflicts through which many of these holy enthusiasts

passed, certainly the world in all its force was against them; no wild

anti-popery riots were more unreasonable and brutal than the turbulent

mobs which tore down houses and insolently assaulted women and men for

their attachment to the new movement. Attempts were often made on

Wesley's life in Cornwall; wild cries rose around him, 'Away with

him!' 'Kill him at once!' 'Crucify the dog!' Stones and bricks were

frequently hurled at him; often he might have said, 'My soul is among

lions.' Staffordshire was scarcely behind Cornwall in the rough

assaults. Quiet men were pressed for soldiers, and sent as prisoners

to jail, simply because they were Methodists; hot-headed Hanoverians

did their best to make the whole Methodist body disloyal, and both

John and Charles Wesley were arrested or taken before the magistrates

upon suspicion of being favourable to the Pretender. Thus Charles was

brought before the magistrates at Wakefield, and five witnesses were

ready to swear that he had either prayed or preached about the return

of the 'Banished One,' the well-known and tender words of the wise

woman of Tekoa, being supposed to convey some sinister allusion to the

exiled Stuarts. It was the age of mobs and riots; for a long time the

preaching of Wesley appears to have been greeted by turbulencies as

wild and vehement as those which give a disgraceful notoriety to the

name of John Wilkes or Lord George Gordon.

So astonishing were the results of these very simple and Christ-like

ministrations, that there was surely something of the supernatural in

the man Wesley. It is part of the very nature of Christianity to

believe that from time to time the Church is invigorated by

extraordinary impulses of divine life find grace, and singular

effusions of the Holy Spirit: and to those who are able to reach at

all the idea of supernatural causes in the Christian life, it is not

difficult to apprehend the reality of such impulses. There was surely

much that was remarkable in Wesley; it is unquestionable that strange

influences seemed to attend him. His words, it has been remarked,

seemed to possess a mesmeric power; his proximity to the supernatural

has often been made the subject of criticism. Extraordinary

circumstances which Southey, Richard Watson, Isaac Taylor, and other

eminent writers have found to be perfectly inexplicable upon

principles of natural reasoning marked his ministry; we read of

innumerable instances of individual convulsions, and of multitudes

falling prostrate to the ground before his words; cold and

imperturbable natures were suddenly overwhelmed. Wesley was quite a

believer in the visible and oral manifestation of the 'powers of the

world to come;' such instances were especially prominent in the

earlier part of his singular course. We have no remarks to make upon

these phenomena, nor shall we inquire whether they may or may not be

accounted for on merely natural principles; the facts remain

unquestioned. One thing is certain, as when Peter preached, so at the

preaching of Wesley, innumerable thousands were 'pricked to the heart,

and exclaimed, "What shall we do?"'

The power of Wesley's teaching may probably be traced to the fact that

it dealt with sin as sin, and with souls as souls; but then the whole

doctrine was suffused in the fulness, the sufficiency, and the

sweetness of Jesus, and it was a mighty reaction against the

indifference and injustice of the age. The party formed against Wesley

represented the higher classes, bishops and men whose minds and hearts

it would seem were incapable of sympathy for the suffering and the

poor, and for those who were out of the way; coarse ribalds like

Lavington, the Bishop of Exeter, or dilettanti gentlemen like Horace

Walpole, buffoons and time servers like Foote, or even hard

theologians like Toplady, their doctrines tinctured with the harsh and

morbid severity of the times, when, as we have seen, reckless

disregard for life, a claim over it for the most insignificant

offences, must have tended to give a rigour and narrowness to many

religious ideas. Wesley's audiences were chiefly composed of the poor.

The early Methodist was a very simple, perhaps usually an ignorant,

man, but he had that light which 'lighteth every man that cometh into

the world.' The Methodist was not such an one as the Puritan of other

days, who was a sort of Knight of the Iron Hand, a Nonconformist

crusader, whose theology had trained him to the battle-field, nerved

him to frown defiance upon kings, and to treat as worthy only of

contempt the unsanctified nobles of the earth. The Methodist was not

such an one; he was as loyal as he was lowly, he had been forgotten or

passed by, by priests and Levites, but suddenly he found himself

raised to the rank of a living soul--a voice had reached him assuring

him that he, too, was in possession of a soul. Over the country the

ground, on the whole, was easy to Wesley to win; there was no

education, there were no conflicts of opinion, there were no popular

books, the people had no objects to claim their attention, the towns

were far apart, and connected only by the mail or stagecoach, or that

heavy and much more romantic-looking than agreeable conveyance, the

market-cart; there was little popular excitement, there were only

coarse amusements. It is unquestionable that the people had far fewer

religious interests than in the old days of popery, the entire

services of the Church were bald and uninteresting, there was no

music, unless of such a description as to move the passions by

shattering the nerves,--there was no popular psalmody worthy of the

name; thus the religious nature was entranced or buried. But the

Methodist was one who had heard the call of God, conscience had been

stirred within him, and a new life had created new interests; for

Christianity really ennobles a man, gives him self-respect, shows to

him a new purpose and business in life, and stirs the spirit,

moreover, with a pulse of joy and cheerfulness; hence Methodism

created the necessity for meetings and for frequent reciprocations.

There were no chapels, or but few, and none to open their doors to

these strange new pilgrims to the celestial city. The churches, of

course, were closed against them;--what could be done, for they must

speak together. Reciprocation was the soul of Methodism; almost all

the great religious movements have been instituted and marked by some

sign--Dominic invented the rosary, Loyola the spiritual contemplations

and the retreat, Wesleyanism created Class-meetings; this constituted

its essential symbolism. A church can scarcely long maintain a

standing without a symbol. This is the countersign of parties and

sects. So these people assembled in each other's houses, in rude and

homely rooms, by farm ingles, in lone hamlets; thus was created a

homely piety, rugged enough, but full of beautiful and pathetic

instincts. When the faith became more consciously objective, it was

possessed by that singular belief ruling the Church in all such

movements--the belief in the power, conjoined to the desire to save

souls. This drove them out on great occasions to call the vast

multitudes together on heaths and moors. Occasionally, but this was at

a later period, some country gentleman threw open his old hall to the

preachers; but the more aristocratic phase of the Methodist movement

fell into the Calvinistic rather than into the Wesleyan ranks; these

last sought the sequestered places of nature, or in cities and towns

they took to the streets, outlying fields or broadways; in some

neighbourhoods a little room was built containing the germ of what in

a few years became a large Wesleyan society. The burden of all their

meetings and their intercourse, whether in speech or song, was the

sweetness and fullness of Jesus; they had an intense faith in the love

of God shed abroad in the heart; their great solicitude was that souls

were on the brink of perdition. This was to them more than spiritual

difficulties, mere interior trials, or speculative despair; these were

mostly a _terra incognita_ to them. Wesley dealt, as it has been

expressed, with sin as sin, and with souls as souls; he had little

regard to mere proprieties. Wesley and his preachers, 'out of breath

pursuing souls,' seemed to many ungraceful, undignified, their faces

weary, their hands heavy with toil. Yet these men had found, such as

it was, a definite creed, and, as in the case of their great leader,

all the inexhaustible variety and world-wide energy of other minds

were in them concentrated into a burning instinct; the word of 'the

Lord was like fire, or like a hammer.' The early Methodists had also

the mighty instincts of prayer--to them there was a meaning in it and

a joy. So these men pursued their way. God's ministry goes on by

various means, ordinary and extraordinary; it is the difference

between rivers and rains, between the dews and the lightnings, the

rivers are exhaled by the sun and return to the earth in rains, the

Severn and the Wye roll their beautiful forces through the meadow and

along the hill-side, but if they did not give their waters to the sun

and the cloud, and fall back upon the earth as dew and showers, they

would cease from their channels among the hills. So Methodism availed

itself of the ordinary and extraordinary.

All truly holy souls, even those the most opposed in their pews or

their studies, meet and melt and mingle in song; holy song is the

solvent of the most divergent creeds. Perhaps the greater number of

the early Methodists were not pressed by physical want; concern for

the soul was the grand business, in many instances possibly it was a

wild and even diseased feeling. There was no art, no splendid form of

worship or ritual; early Methodism was as free from all this as

Clairvaux, in the valley of Wormwood, when Bernard ministered there

with all his monks around him, or as Cluny, when Bernard de Morlaix

chanted his 'Jerusalem the Golden.' Methodism, like all the great

religious movements which have shaken men's souls, was purely

spiritual, or, if it had a sensuous expression, it was not artificial;

loud 'Amens!' resounded as Wesley preached, spoke, or prayed, and then

the hearty gushes of, perhaps, not melodious song united all hearts in

some Wesleyan Litany or Te Deum. It was so throughout the whole land;

such cyclones of spiritual power mysteriously visit our world from age

to age, but this surely was one in which there was infinitely more to

bless and benefit, and far less to which good taste or good sense

could take any exception, than in perhaps any of the great preceding

waves of spiritual power which had rolled over Europe. It was the

ascetic type set forth by Wesley in an age of animal and sensual

indulgence. It was principally by fighting with the sins of the age,

at the same time by laying hold upon its characteristics, and

especially by remembering that man is more than a machine to fill rich

men's pockets, or to digest victuals--a soul, in fact, for whom Christ

died--that Methodism 'grew mightily, and prevailed.'

The strength of a great and popular leader is especially shown in his

power to infuse his own spirit into the minds of other men, thus

constituting an organized band of kindred helpers; never surely was

there a man who more remarkably abides this test than Wesley, and he

became the general of a remarkable order. Protestantism may well, with

Wesley to adduce, challenge Rome to produce any superior illustration

of spiritual power. Archbishop Manning has spoken of St. Benedict, St.

Francis, St. Dominic, and St. Ignatius, chiefs of the orders they

created, as the four rivers of the water of life; it is a singular

illustration and not creditable to the archbishop's piety or good

taste; but if Wesley be compared with these great fathers of the

Romish Church, he shines brilliantly in the comparison. Mr. Tyerman

enthusiastically inquires, 'Is it not true that Methodism is the

greatest fact in the history of the Church of Christ?' We may reply we

do not think so, and may yet be prepared to render almost equal homage

with Mr. Tyerman to this stupendous spiritual organization. John

Wesley very soon poured his animating spirit into other men, and the

history of Jesuitism--that marvellous story of the conquest of the

human mind--does not exhibit anything like so striking an array of

heroic and glorious achievements. Rome would make much of such a

history, had she to recite it of herself. The names of those who

surround Wesley as his fellow-labourers and helpers are, indeed, all

of them humble men; no courtly or episcopal favour smiled upon him or

them as they passed along. He had absolutely nothing but the pure

Gospel, by the proclamation of which he sought to awaken human

interest and to command attention; but soon there came a host, of whom

it might be said, 'There went with him a band of men whose hearts God

had touched.' The mind of England seemed to be waiting for that which

Wesley brought to it. Spiritually dead as the Church of England was,

many clergymen, responsive to his call, shook off their lethargy, and

several, like William Grimshaw, of Haworth, laboured heartily with the

apostle of Methodism. The right material was constantly at hand so

soon as it was needed, in men who have almost passed away from memory,

but whose 'record is on high.' We have no space for the review of that

long gallery of interesting portraits of marked and remarkable men;

only we notice there seemed to be a hand for every kind of work that

had to be accomplished; one to lead on the polemic work of the

disputant, and another, or others, to pour forth hymns; some to sway,

by rugged but splendid powers of persuasion, immense masses of people;

others to minister in localities and gather up the lost sheep into

folds; and others to visit in prison, or in those scenes where the

tender voice and the ministering hand were needed, while all bowed

before the omnific mind of Wesley. Few lives are more startling than

that of John Nelson; few types of saintly holiness are higher than

Thomas Walsh; Thomas Maxfield has generally been supposed to be the

first of the long line of lay preachers to whose exertions Methodism

owes so much; while John and Thomas Oliver, John Haine, George Story,

and Sampson Staniforth, and a number of other goodly names, represent

lives of such intense earnestness, holiness, and activity, as would

certainly win them a place in a Catholic calendar of saints, and are

so full of glowing adventure, that the story of many of them would

keep a boy's eyes from winking even late in the night.

Simultaneously with Wesley came the singular apparition of Whitefield,

who fell into no groove of Church routine or life, although

undoubtedly standing on the Calvinistic side of Methodist opinion. It

is interesting to compare these two men together. Whitefield sprang

upon the world ready armed as a youth of twenty, and finished his

career in the prime of life; he seems almost to realize, if it can be

realized, the idea of an abstract soul. We read his words, and they

are nothing; but those words uttered by him broke down, overwhelmed,

and dissolved all prejudices. What must he have been to whom such

strong men, such courtly, artificial, yet highly cultured men, such

sceptical and inaccessible men as Bolingbroke, and Chesterfield, and

David Hume, and Garrick, and Benjamin Franklin, 'were as tow,' while

he was as 'a spark' to kindle all into consuming flame. Not

immediately connected with Wesley's organization, this mysterious and

marvellous man, an entire soul of all-embracing love and compassion,

greatly aided the movement;--equally at home in preaching in the

select saloons of the Countess of Huntingdon, to Dukes and Duchesses

and arrays of Peers, or in the wildest and most furious and murderous

mobs. Whitefield is a mystery to us; he only seems to burn with an

incandescent heat, so that words shrivel, and evaporate in the flame

of that pure, ingenuous, generous, and wholly consecrated soul; and

this, notwithstanding the melody of that full, clear, all-encompassing

voice, varying to every passionate accent, sinking to the most

penetrating entreaty, swelling to the most rousing apostrophe. In the

full careering heat of his speech, Whitefield became, unconsciously to

himself, poet, philosopher, psychologist, thus enabling us to

understand something of his stupendous power, even while we are still

perplexed as to its cause. No melody or poetry shines through the

words of his published discourses; but no pictures we have ever met

with of inspired, rapt oratory, are more surprising than those which

are presented to us by his contemporaries of Whitefield's preaching,

on the slope of some mountain or hill, the trees and hedges full of

people hushed to profound silence, the open firmament above him, the

green fields around him, the sight of thousands on thousands of

people, some in coaches, some on horseback, gathered around him and

all affected--melted to tears. When the evening approached, he once

said, 'Beneath the twilight it was too much, and quite overcame me!'

One night he describes a time never to be forgotten: it lightened

exceedingly; he preached the warnings and the consolations of the

coming of the Son of Man; the thunder broke over his head, the

lightning gleamed upon his path; it ran along the ground, and shone

from one part of the heavens to the other. His spirit rose above the

storm; he longed for the time when Christ should be revealed in

flaming fire. 'Oh,' exclaims he, 'that my soul may live in a like

flame, when He shall actually come to call me!'

But Wesley's success! Wesley, as an orator, seems still more

inconceivable. By all accounts Whitefield was seraphic. Wesley seldom

rose beyond penetrating good sense, and nothing appears to have

transported him out of his invariable calm. Yet the effects of his

oratory were even still more wonderful; there was something of

magnetism in it. Henry Moore, his great friend, says, 'At this moment,

I well remember my first thought after hearing him preach nearly fifty

years ago; _spiritual_ things are natural things to that man;' In

innumerable instances we find audiences shaken as by a mighty wind,

hurled down, agonizing, screaming aloud; there was much more of all

this in Wesley's preaching than in Whitefield's, yet in Whitefield's

we should expect it more. Wesley, in the style of his oratory, seems

to have been judicial, and our readers are not unaware of the

remarkable power that quiet statement is able to exercise. Who so

passionless apparently as Jonathan Edwards, a man who would have

disdained every approach to sensationalism, whose entire mode of

pulpit delivery was obnoxious to all ideas of pulpit oratory, and

whose whole scheme of thought and expression were as calm and clear as

logical metaphysics could make them? yet what scenes he witnessed when

he preached? Thus it was eminently with Wesley; crowds thronged around

him intent to listen wherever he appeared; if the face was beautiful,

the height of the body was so far beneath the average standard that it

seems almost contemptible for the holding of such powers as he

wielded; and then the voice, not less than the manner, appears to have

been unfitted to carry tempests of passion--nor did he desire that it

should; we suppose that it must have been singularly clear and

penetrating, and that every sentence was sharply cut and elaborated,

not by preparation and the pen, but by convictions deep and indelible.

Such sentences carried upon a clear penetrating voice--and in oratory

the voice is all but everything--will achieve more than more plausible

means. It is fervour which fires, but fervour often burns more

effectually in the still, white, soundless heat, than in what seems to

be the most raging flame. There must have been considerable natural

dignity in the man. 'Be silent, or begone,' he said on one occasion to

some who were molesting him in preaching, and the intruders were

silenced. The traditions of Methodism are rich in the recollection of

such scenes;--the scenes of Gwennap Pit for instance. This is a

natural excavation, three miles from Redruth, an amphitheatre, formed

by nature, whose walls are from seven to eight hundred feet in height,

and which is capable of holding from twenty-five to thirty thousand

persons. This was one of Wesley's most famous churches. Year after

year this most spacious and magnificent cathedral amongst the wild

moors of Cornwall was crowded by vast and hushed assemblies. Until

Wesley's day, all that immense population might have said, 'No man

cared for our souls.' Wild, rugged miners and fishermen of whom it was

true that they never breathed a prayer except for the special

providence of a shipwreck--men whose wicked barbarity in kindling

delusive lights along the coast to allure unfortunate ships to the

cruel cliffs of those dangerous shores, had won for their region the

name of 'West Barbary.' Now, as if some power had passed over them,

clothed anew and in their right minds, they assembled to greet and

gladden their venerable father in that wild glen, creating a strange

and not unbeautiful life in the stillness of that desolate and

romantic spot, and worshipping with the birds overhead and the broom

and the wild flowers under foot, under the overhanging shadow of the

venerable rocks. Truly it must have been a sublime thing to have heard

that great multitude peal out in Wesley's own words:--

'Suffice that for the season past,

Hell's horrid language filled our tongues,

We all thy words behind us cast,

And loudly sang the drunkard's songs.

But, oh! the power of grace divine,

In hymns we now our voices raise,

Loudly in strange hosannas join,

And blasphemies are turned to praise.'

Twenty-five thousand persons! and it is said he was able to make

everyone hear his words; wonderful, whether we think of the acoustical

properties of the church itself, the attentiveness the preacher could

command, or the marvellous strength, the clearness and fulness of his

voice.

Of all the helpers from whom Wesley derived assistance essential to

the carrying on his work, his brother Charles was the most

providential. He was a narrow ecclesiastic, and often troublesome, but

he did good service. Much as Wesley loved the service of the Church of

England, it was utterly impossible to employ it in the work he set

himself to perform; but it has been felt again and again, whether it

has been expressed or not, that a religious service without liturgies

is impossible. People may disclaim and disown the word liturgy, and

substitute for it psalms and hymns, the fact remains the same; psalms

and hymns are liturgies in rhyme--liturgies sung instead of said.

Congregations need to be held together; the voice of a solitary soul

is not enough for religious purposes, and especially for the pressure

of overwrought emotions; multitudes require something more than a mere

monologue. Wesley arose at a time when that popular and united form of

worship, the hymn, had but just ceased to be regarded as an

innovation. There were Churches in London--Maze Pond, for

instance--which had divided upon the question of singing, and the

unmusical members went off, and formed a community of their own,

undistracted by notes of song. Watts had only just published some of

his psalms and hymns, when Wesley came down among the people and began

to move to and fro amongst his congregations. The want of simple forms

of prayer and praise was soon felt. No doubt his recent acquaintance

with the Moravians had given him invaluable suggestions, of which he

was prepared to avail himself. Amidst much which was worse than

foolish, the Moravians had, as he knew, many inspiring psalms, and a

far greater variety of metre than English devotional verse had

heretofore employed. Some of the most magnificent hymns in the

Wesleyan collection are Wesley's translations from Zinzendorf and

other German psalmists; but the fulness and splendour of Wesleyan

psalmody was developed by Charles Wesley. His hymns have been the

liturgies of Methodism, the creeds of that Church have been embodied

in them, they have formed its collects, and enshrined its loftiest

bursts of devotional ardour. What sentiment of Christian experience is

there which does not find an utterance in them? What phase of

Methodist faith is there which is not translated into some of these

verses? In preparing the hymn-book, indeed, a great number of Watts's

hymns were included, and included not only without any acknowledgment,

but the preface, from the pen of John, claims for the Wesleys all the

hymns in the volume. In this condition the hymn-book remains to this

day, and we have often conversed with Methodists who have stoutly

maintained that certain hymns in the volume legitimately belong to it,

although published by Watts years before its compilation. This,

however, in no way interferes with the estimate we have to form of

these sacred lyrics; of course, the Methodist estimate of them is that

they are the highest achievements of sacred song. That which we are

constantly using, and which touches our affections becomes supremely

precious and dear to us. They are all eminently experimental; they

seem to have been constructed for the class-meeting and band-meeting;

they are especially conjubilant, hymns well calculated to excite and

stir, and carry aloft the feelings of the people; and they have

become--they very soon became--the voices of the Church.

Wesley, in his reformation, soon commenced the work of reforming the

singing. Throughout his life and labours he often remarks upon the

questionable psalmody by which he was greeted; thus at Warrington, he

says:--

'I put a stop to a bad custom which was creeping in here; a

few men, who had fine voices, sang a psalm which no one

knew, in a tune fit for an opera, wherein three, four, or

five persons sung different words at the same time; what an

insult to common sense! what a burlesque upon public

worship! no custom can excuse such a mixture of profanity

and absurdity.'

British Quarterly Review, American Edition, Vol. LIV July and October, 1871 · 第 48 / 71 题