The following is one of the cardinal points of this school:--

"Add to all this, that civilisation, which sows dissension and

war on every side; which employs a great part of its powers in

unproductive labor or even in destruction; which furthermore

diminishes the public wealth by the unnecessary friction and

discord it introduces into industry; add to all this, I say,

that this same social system has for its special characteristic

to produce a repugnance for work--a disgust for labor.

"Everywhere you hear the laborer, the artisan, the clerk

complain of his position and his occupation, while they long for

the time when they can retire from work imposed upon them by

necessity. To be repugnant, to have for its motive and pivot

nothing but the fear of starvation, is the great, the fatal,

characteristic of civilised labor. The civilised workman is

condemned to penal servitude. So long as productive labor is so

organized that instead of being associated with pleasure it is

associated with pain, weariness and dislike, it will always

happen that all will avoid it who are able. With few exceptions,

those only will consent to work who are compelled to it by want.

Hence the most numerous classes, the artificers of social

wealth, the active and direct creators of all comfort and

luxury, will always be condemned to touch closely on poverty and

hunger; they will always be the slaves to ignorance and

degradation; they will continue to be always that huge herd of

mere beasts of burden whom we see ill-grown, decimated by

disease, bowed down in the great workshop of society over the

plow or over the counter, that they may prepare the delicate

food, and the sumptuous enjoyments of the upper and idle

classes.

"So long as no method of attractive labor has been devised, it

will continue to be true that 'there must be many poor in order

that there may be a few rich;' a mean and hateful saying, which

we hear every day quoted as an eternal truth from the mouths of

people who call themselves Christians or philosophers. It is

very easy to understand that oppression, trickery, and

especially poverty, are the permanent and fatal appanage of

every state of society characterized by the dislike of work,

for, in this case, there is nothing but poverty that will force

men to labor. And the proof of this is, that if every one of all

the workers were to become suddenly rich, nineteen-twentieths of

all the work now done would be abandoned."[7]

In the opinion of the Fourierists, the tendency of the present order

of society is to a concentration of wealth in the hands of a

comparatively few immensely rich individuals or companies, and the

reduction of all the rest of the community into a complete dependence

on them. This was termed by Fourier _la jeodalite industrielle_.

"This feudalism," says M. Considerant, "would be constituted as

soon as the largest part of the industrial and territorial

property of the nation belongs to a minority which absorbs all

its revenues, while the great majority, chained to the

work-bench or laboring on the soil, must be content to gnaw the

pittance which is cast to them."[8]

This disastrous result is to be brought about partly by the mere

progress of competition, as sketched in our previous extract by M.

Louis Blanc; assisted by the progress of national debts, which M.

Considerant regards as mortgages of the whole land and capital of the

country, of which "les capitalistes preteurs" become, in a greater and

greater measure, co-proprietors, receiving without labor or risk an

increasing portion of the revenues.

Socialism · 第 7 / 12 题