So intimately are the nose, throat, and ear connected that it is

unusual to find one affected to any considerable extent without the

others being involved. While the rules of hygiene in general are

applicable to the nose, throat, and ear, there are certain special

conditions which deserve consideration. One of the most common causes

of injurious effects to the nose, throat, and ear is the so-called

"cold." The cold in this connection is, of course, understood to be

simply the cause, the condition itself being a peculiar inflammation

of the parts concerned. As cold is so frequently a cause of diseases

of these parts, it would be well to consider under what circumstances

it develops and the best mode of prevention.

I have often noticed that persons who suffer most frequently and

severely from colds usually insist that they exercise the greatest

care to avoid exposure. They have dressed in the warmest clothing,

wrapped the neck in the heaviest mufflers, remained in the closest

rooms, and avoided every draught, and yet they continually "take

cold." The street urchin, on the other hand, with only two or three

garments and without shoes, and who lives out of doors, suffers less

frequently from this affection.

"Colds" have truly been called a product of modern civilization. The

trouble was rare among the aborigines and is more common among the

cultured than among the laboring classes. If we make a plant an

exotic, we must keep it in the conservatory, and even here it is not

free from danger. On the other hand, if we wish to harden it and make

it proof against atmospheric and climatic changes, we must prepare it

by judicious exposure for these conditions. The warm clothing which is

thought to be a protection against cold is frequently the most fertile

cause. It relaxes the body, moistens the skin, and the perspiration

which is induced especially prepares the unresisting body for its

attacks. This applies especially to warm covering around the neck, to

which the air has periodic access. Except in unusually severe weather,

the throat requires no more covering or protection than the face.

The method of having only two systems of underclothing, the heavy to

be worn until it is quite warm, and _vice versa_, is also a source of

danger. There should be three changes: one of the lightest texture for

the warm weather of summer, a medium for spring and fall, and the pure

wool for winter, which in this climate need not be very heavy.

Waterproof shoes, rubbers, furs, etc., are not recommended for

customary use, and should be worn only when absolutely indicated.

The best preventive of recurrent colds is the judicious use of the

sponge or cold shower bath. The ordinary bath should usually be of a

temperature not disagreeable to the body, but after the question of

cleanliness has been attended to, an application, either by means of a

sponge or shower, of ordinary cold water should be made. This should

be of short duration, and friction with a coarse towel follow at once.

When properly conducted, a reaction sets in so that there is no danger

from this, and the toning effect of the method is of the utmost value

in the prevention of colds. This applies, of course, only to persons

in ordinarily good health. Even in these cases there are rare

occasions in which this method is not advisable, and it may on general

principles be stated that it should not be used by persons who do not

react promptly. As stated, however, the application of cold water

should be only momentary. The daily application of cold water to the

throat and chest is also a useful practice for strengthening these

parts.

In addition to these means there are certain injurious conditions that

it would be well to avoid. One almost universally present in large

cities is that of dust. The constant inhalation of the small particles

of sand and of organic impurities of which dust is composed has an

irritating effect on the delicate lining of the nose and throat, which

may develop a chronic inflammation, resulting in injury to both the

throat and ear. This evil, however, can be prevented by the artificial

watering of our streets.

Excessive tobacco smoking produces injurious effects in the nose and

throat. Of all forms of smoking, the cigarette is the most injurious,

and allowing the smoke to pass through the nostrils the most

dangerous. Occasionally ladies inhale the smoke of a closed room

where the male members of the household are smoking, and this is

injurious to a delicate throat.

Loud and excessive talking is sometimes a factor in throat diseases.

The former is more apt to be exercised in transit in our steam or

electric cars, and members of the theatrical profession realize this

so well that they rarely use their voice while traveling. In excessive

talking, in addition to the mechanical wear and tear of the throat,

the respiration is usually spasmodic, a combination that is likely to

lead to evil results. At puberty, when the voices of boys and girls

are changing, the former sometimes almost an octave and the latter

usually a note or two, special care should be taken of the voice, and

singing or vocal exercises should be discontinued until the change has

been finally established.

The effect of singing on the throat is of much interest, but it is one

of such an extensive character that it can be only casually referred

to here. The exercise required in singing improves the healthy throat

in the same manner that exercise benefits the body in general. The

diseased throat, however, may be injured by this practice, as no form

of vocal culture can remedy a mechanical interference in its action.

The method of singing is also of the utmost importance; an erroneous

one may not only injure a promising voice, but may also have a bad

effect on a normal throat. The subject of register requires careful

consideration. The placing of the voice in the wrong register is

fruitful of evil; the ambition of the singer to reach a few notes

higher or lower than her range may also work severe injury to the

throat.

The throat may be improved or strengthened by any of the forms of

exercise, especially the out-of-door, which have been advised for the

health in general. In addition to this, breathing exercises are of

special value. These consist of taking deep inhalations through the

nose, holding the breath for a few seconds and then gently expiring

it, the body in the meanwhile being free from all restraint from tight

clothing. The practice of this exercise for five minutes mornings and

evenings will have a remarkable effect in developing the chest and

throat.

In order to anticipate serious complications, children should be

taught to allow their mothers to examine their throats freely and

without resistance. I feel especially the importance of this subject,

as I have frequently seen children almost sacrificed on account of the

nervous dread of having their throats examined, or by their inability

to control themselves. The method is exceedingly simple: the child is

placed facing a bright window, and the handle of a spoon placed on the

tongue and so depressed that the posterior part of the throat can be

distinctly seen. At first this may be difficult, but the child soon

becomes accustomed to the manipulation and the throat may then be

examined without difficulty. Another advantage of this procedure is

that the mother becomes familiar with the normal appearance of the

throat, and can easily note any change due to disease.

In view of the important function of the nose in warming, cleaning,

and moistening the inspired air, the greatest care should be taken to

teach children to breathe through the nostrils. When only a portion of

the air enters through the mouth, the irritation is not as marked as

when all the air is inhaled in this manner, but it nevertheless

develops a condition of chronic irritation which is easily recognized

by one familiar with its appearance, and which may lead to important

complications. In many cases, mouth breathing is not due to habit, but

to some obstruction in the nostrils or throat. These cases form a

proper subject for the consideration of the physician. After the

removal of any existing obstruction, children will sometimes, from

force of habit, continue to breathe through the mouth, but this can

usually be overcome by attention and firmness on the part of the

parents.

The prevention of grave throat diseases, such as diphtheria,

necessarily forms a subject of much interest to the public in general

and to mothers in particular. The causation of this disease has been

much cleared up in later years, and we now know that the important

factor is a bacillus--a small organism of the vegetable kingdom--which

is the cause of this disease and a necessary material for its

propagation. Bacteriologic investigations have shown that the

so-called "membranous croup" is in by far the largest number of cases

identical with diphtheria, and the same precautions which apply to the

latter should therefore also be carried out in this disease.

As diphtheria is strictly an infectious disease, and one which must be

directly or indirectly contracted from a similar case, there is no

sanitary reason why this dreaded malady in the course of time should

not be entirely eliminated from the earth. In view of the fact that

diphtheria is so frequently present in our larger cities, this may

appear at present a Utopian idea. It is not so many years ago,

however, when smallpox was almost universal, and yet we now but rarely

have it in our midst. Not only is this the case, but the health

authorities are severely criticised when a number of these cases

exist, as indicating that there has been a lack of watchfulness in

carrying out certain well-known means of prevention.

While we have at the present time no means of inoculation that will

permanently protect against infection from diphtheria, still it is not

of such an infectious character as smallpox, as the cases are usually

limited to children, and its spread may therefore be more easily

prevented. Not only should children who have had diphtheria be

prevented from returning to school until infection is no longer

possible, but other children of the same household should also be kept

at home. A few years ago a certain school in this city was rarely

without a case of diphtheria among its pupils for many months. I am

convinced that had the principal of the school or the parents insisted

upon the other children of the infected household remaining at home,

the spread in this direction would have been arrested and much

suffering avoided.

When a patient has recovered from diphtheria, thorough disinfection is

a most important measure. Unfortunately, however, many persons

consider it a hardship if articles which can not be disinfected are

destroyed, and many will even use every endeavor to prevent the

representatives of the Board of Health from carrying out their

regulations. In this way the germ of the disease remains on the

premises, and under suitable conditions again finds another victim in

the household. To illustrate this, I recall an instance some years ago

in which I was called in consultation to see a most malignant case of

diphtheria. The little patient fortunately recovered, and the premises

were thoroughly disinfected, the parents being anxious to avoid any

repetition of the dreaded malady. Five months later, however, a

younger child became ill, and was found to have diphtheria. In view of

the vigorous efforts which had been made to disinfect the house

thoroughly, and of the fact that the child could not have contracted

it elsewhere, not having left its home for several weeks, the cause at

first appeared a mystery. Careful inquiry, however, soon elicited a

fact which clearly explained the case. The first patient had used a

mouth-organ just before its illness, and when this was abandoned, the

toy was carelessly thrown on the top of a bookcase, the nature of the

child's illness at the time not being known. The second child, just

before its illness, had accidentally found this toy and used it

frequently. This experience explains the necessity of disinfection in

all its details, and also illustrates the tenacious character of the

germ which produces this disease.

Our knowledge of the specific cause of scarlet fever is not as

complete as that of diphtheria, but we have much useful information

which is of importance from a hygienic standpoint. As in diphtheria,

the specific poison is probably produced in the throat of the patient,

and may therefore be spread by the dried secretion from the mouth and

throat. The most common means of contagion, however, is the skin,

which peels off in the later stage of the disease, infection being

produced by the inhalation into the nostrils of some of the diseased

particles.

A predisposing factor which applies alike to diphtheria and all other

throat affections is the abnormal condition of the nose and throat.

When these important parts are in an unhealthy condition, where mouth

breathing exists and other conditions inimical to normal health, the

patient is more predisposed to all forms of maladies of this region,

and the attack when developed is more apt to be of a serious

character. The more ordinary forms of sore throat, such as tonsilitis,

are frequently due to defects in the sanitary conditions and

surroundings of the home. While modern sanitary plumbing, when

properly constructed, adds much to the convenience of the household,

it is a certain menace to all its members if, through improper

construction or defective ventilation, decomposing matter collects in

the waste pipes and vitiates the atmosphere of the rooms. Many

recurrent cases of tonsilitis are due to this cause. Even the ordinary

stationary washstands may be a source of danger, especially in the

bedroom, unless thoroughly ventilated and care exercised that the

traps are not filled with decomposing matter. A physician of large

experience in this city is so imbued with the danger of this form of

plumbing that he condemns it _in toto_. When well constructed and well

ventilated, however, they can not be the source of danger in the

household.

Tuberculosis, which is responsible for so enormous a mortality,

frequently also affects the throat as well as the lungs. Although it

usually originates within the chest, it sometimes finds its primary

origin in the throat, and in a large percentage of cases the throat

affection forms a complication of tuberculosis of the lungs. In spite

of the numerous remedies which have been advocated for the cure of

this disease, it must be admitted that our chief reliance is in proper

nourishment and climatic effects, and that hygiene is the sheet-anchor

which will eventually rescue us from this terrible foe of the human

race.

Recent investigations tend to prove more and more that tuberculosis is

inherited in but rare cases; that inheritance is simply a predisposing

factor, and that the real cause is infection. As an illustration of

this, all have seen instances in which there had been apparently no

cases in a family for ten or fifteen years, when from some cause one

case develops, and this is soon followed by other cases in the same

family. Whatever rôle heredity may play in these cases, this simply

shows that the first case produced the infectious material which found

a suitable soil in the other members of the family and developed a

similar disease. The inheritance theory has been the source of much

injury by causing members of the afflicted family to submit to the

apparently inevitable instead of instituting measures for its

prevention. The infectious product in tuberculosis is not the breath,

as is so frequently believed by the laity, but simply the

expectoration which comes from the diseased lungs or throat. When this

is allowed to come in contact with clothing or other material in the

room, it becomes dry and loads the atmosphere with a dust which

contains the infectious bacillus, which may cause a similar disease in

a person predisposed by heredity or sickness to this affection.

The germ of tuberculosis is the seed, and the predisposed person the

soil, and it requires a combination of both to develop the disease. To

illustrate the necessity of suitable conditions for the development of

plants--for it is now almost universally admitted that the germ of

tuberculosis is a micro-organism which belongs to the vegetable

kingdom--I remember some years ago, while in North Europe, seeing in a

hothouse a plant which is here commonly known as the "four o'clock."

The gardener in charge of the conservatory considered it a remarkable

plant, but difficult to propagate, and stated that it was absolutely

impossible to raise it out of doors. In this part of the world,

however, we know that this plant grows so easily that once established

in a garden it is difficult to keep it within limits. In both of the

cases we have the same seed, the difference being only in the soil and

the conditions favorable for its development. The absence of either

the seed or the soil will absolutely prevent tuberculosis, and if the

laws of hygiene are properly carried out, both in destroying the seed

and in preventing the formation of a suitable soil, favorable effects

will soon be shown.

Hygiene in regard to patients demands simply that the infectious

character of the expectoration be destroyed. The vessels for this

purpose should contain some disinfecting solution, should be cleaned

regularly, and handkerchiefs, towels, or other material with which the

expectoration has come in contact should be sterilized by being placed

for at least half an hour in boiling water. This is necessary not only

for those in the same room with the patient, but also for the patient,

as it is quite possible that a former expectoration may produce

reinfection of the patient himself.

Another method of contracting tuberculosis is by means of animals,

such as cows, used for food and milking, which are known to be subject

to this disease. It has been shown in some localities that one cow out

of every twenty-five was affected with tubercular disease. This

suggests the importance of having competent veterinarians to examine

not only the meat which is sold, but also the cows used for milking

purposes. Where there is the slightest doubt as to the nature of the

meat or milk, the former should be thoroughly cooked and the latter

sterilized before using.

In this connection it would be well to refer to the subject of

spitting in street cars and in public places. While this nuisance is

the subject of danger to every one in the street cars, especially in

winter, when the windows are closed and a large amount of impurities

is inhaled, it is more particularly so to ladies, whose skirts, in

spite of every care, are soiled by the filthy expectoration, thus

making them subject not only to the inhalation in the car, but also

to carrying the infectious material to their homes.

The danger of this condition is not merely speculative. It has been

bacteriologically demonstrated that the organisms of various

contagious diseases thus find a lodging place in our cars and public

places, and experiments on animals, in which the inoculation has

developed diseases, have shown that these organisms retain their

vitality in these places and may propagate disease under favorable

conditions.

A factor in the spread of diseases of the throat and mouth that should

not be overlooked is kissing. Unfortunately, this matter has usually

been treated with much levity, and where a sanitarian is bold enough

to condemn the habit he is frequently made the subject of all forms of

ridicule in the public press.

The tender lining of the lips, mouth, and throat, and its large blood

supply, make it peculiarly susceptible to contagion, and I have no

doubt that the habit of kissing is responsible for many cases of

infection. Last year I noticed a lady coming from a house from which a

diphtheria flag was flying, who walked to the corner to take the

street car, when a nurse with a small child approached. The lady

without hesitation stooped down and kissed the little child. As it is

well known that a healthy person may transmit a disease without

incurring the disease himself, this lady voluntarily risked the danger

of inflicting this disease upon the innocent child. It is not an

uncommon thing for nurses to kiss the children under their charge, and

here in New Orleans even the colored nurses sometimes practice this

habit, occasionally with the permission of the parents. In fact, a

fashionable lady on one occasion told me, when I remonstrated with her

about this, that she feared to hurt the feelings of the old nurse, who

had been a valuable servant in the family for many years.

How often this habit is productive of evil results is of course only

speculation. I recall, however, an instance in which two small

children of one family developed a specific disease which originated

in the mouth and affected the whole system. Examination proved this to

have been caused by a nurse, a white woman, who had been in the habit

of kissing the children. If women will voluntarily incur risks

by using kissing as a form of salutation in all stages of

acquaintanceship, I would at least request that the innocent children

be spared the possible consequences.

The subject of the hygiene of the ear is so intimately connected with

conditions influencing the nose and throat, which have already been

explained, that but few words are needed to cover this part of my

subject. In general, the best care of the ear is to leave it alone.

Ear scoops are injurious; the ear should be cleaned simply on the

outside, and nothing, as a rule, should be inserted into the external

canal. I have seen many cases of abscess and the most severe

inflammation due to endeavors to clean the ear with the omnipresent

hairpin and other objects used for this purpose. The use of cotton in

the ear in general is to be condemned. It produces an artificial

condition in the outer canal of the ear which reduces its physical

resistance and makes it more liable to injury from exposure. The ear

is sometimes injured by the entrance of cold water. This happens

occasionally during ordinary bathing, but more frequently in outdoor

bathing and in swimming. In surf bathing, where the water is thrown up

with considerable force, it is much more liable to enter the external

orifice of the ear, and severe inflammation may originate from this

cause.

Salt water has been claimed to be more injurious than fresh, but my

personal experience leads me to believe that it is more a question of

temperature than of the quality of the water. Some years ago a large

reservoir was built by an educational institute near this city, the

water, which was quite cold even in summer, being supplied by an

artesian well. The tank was used for bathing purposes, but earache

soon became so frequent among the boys that the use of the reservoir

for this purpose had to be entirely abandoned. In ordinary bathing,

the entrance of water into the ear can easily be avoided. In swimming

or surf bathing it is advisable to use a pledget of lamb's wool to

close the opening of the ears. Ordinary cotton soon becomes saturated

and is of no use in this connection, but the wool, which is slightly

oily, forms an excellent protection in these cases.

The "running ear" is a diseased condition which should not be tampered

with by the inexperienced, but which should not be neglected. The old

idea that the child will outgrow it, or that it is a secretion of the

head which if interfered with would prove dangerous, has been fruitful

of many cases of deafness and even more serious complications.

Appletons' Popular Science Monthly, April 1899 Volume LIV, No. 6, April 1899 · 第 8 / 18 段