AUXILIARY SOCIETIES.

“To do good and to communicate” should be the object of every

philanthropist, as it certainly is the aim of this Society; and it is

with pleasure that we now announce that a correspondence between the

President of the Society and several distinguished gentlemen in

different parts of this State, warrant a hope that before long,

Societies, auxiliaries to this, will be established in various counties

of the Commonwealth, and the philanthropy of the good of both sexes will

be called into new action and concentrated upon the great object of

lessening the miseries of public prisons in their neighborhood, by

suggesting improvements in the police and general administration of the

establishments, and by dealing directly and affectionately with the

miserable inmates of the cells or the crowded rooms.

The correspondence with those to whom the measure has been opened, shows

a readiness on the part of some to begin the work; but prudential

considerations have suggested a postponement of the undertaking, in some

counties, till a strong and steady co-operation can be secured from

those who are now absent in the service of the country, or till the

state of the country will allow men of public spirit and of

philanthropic principles to withdraw their attention from national

matters. Certainly a postponement upon such grounds is to be preferred

to a failure of efforts from a want of thorough co-operation.

It is desirable that auxiliary societies should be established, in order

to call into exercise, and direct into proper channels, the spirit of

philanthropy that abounds in our State, and to give object and

employment to that self-denying devotion which marks the character of

woman, and is found in a class of men that rarely are named with public

benefactors, though they are found, when opportunities present, where

humanity has its most repulsive duties and earns its highest rewards.

A correspondence between the parent Society and its auxiliaries in the

interior of the State, or with independent associations laboring to the

same end and with similar means, would diffuse information that would

stimulate exertion and promote the great object of alleviating the

miseries of prisoners. Especially would such auxiliaries often assist

the agents and committees of the parent Society, by information as to

the character of prisoners, and aid in procuring employment for the

repentant vicious and criminal, who would strengthen their good

resolution by seeking occupation where the chance of meeting old

associates would be greatly diminished, and where temptations to a

recurrence to former faults would not abound. It is now believed that

the hopes of forming these auxiliaries will soon be realized. But there

has always been found some difficulty in the first steps towards an

organization. The willingness of many needs information to strengthen

resolve; and especially is it found that where there is to be a

concurrent action, there is great need of some representative of the

views and sentiments of the parent Society, to concentrate and direct

the efforts of those who, with the best motives and most earnest wishes

for success, pause upon the initiatory step, from distrust as to their

ability to organize and direct a society, or an apprehension that they

may lack the hearty co-operation of others no less philanthropic or

energetic than themselves.

We, perhaps, then shall need, at a proper time, some representative of

the parent Society specially deputed to stir up the public mind in the

direction of humanity in prisons, and to take advantage of the effects

of his labors to unite the exertions of the good in the form of

auxiliaries, that shall have their committees in every place of

imprisonment, doing the work of philanthropy by alleviating the miseries

of prisons and improving the moral condition of the prisoners. These

auxiliaries will aid the parent Society in influencing legislation

favorable to the cause of humanity, and, in proportion to their number

and to the character of their members, they will be felt and their power

acknowledged by the Representatives of the people, not in any attempt at

dictation, but in the mild, steady presentation and advocacy of measures

of amelioration that shall triumph by their inherent beauty and mercy,

influencing public sentiment and purifying legislative enactments.

In a subsequent part of this Report, under the head of “Correspondence,”

will be found large supplemental abstracts of British Parliamentary

Reports; and it is thought that a few words explanatory of the British

and Irish system might, in this part of our Report, be made useful in

aid of the plan for auxiliaries. England has learned much from us in the

work of Prison Discipline: we might learn something of her, (more,

indeed, than we _shall_ acquire,) were our institutions more

assimilated, and especially were we as geographically circumscribed as

she is.

The “Prison Reports,” physical and moral, in Great Britain, are all to

the Government of the nation; and every part of every city jail seems to

work with as distinct a reference to the whole system of prison

regulation as the lower clerkships of a State Department do to the

administration of the whole. This, it must be admitted, is easy in that

country, where there is but one legislature to direct, and one

government to administer and execute. It would be impossible in this

country, for the National Congress to issue ordinances for the

administration of _State_, county, and city prisons. To say nothing of

State rights and State sovereignty, there would be insurmountable

difficulties in prescribing and carrying out rules for prison discipline

and dietaries for all the jails from Oregon to Maine. So that, when we

read of the happy and harmonious working of the prison laws in Ireland

and Great Britain, we must call to mind the proximity of each

establishment to the other, and of the whole to the Government, to whose

chief officers they are bound to make report, and with whose agents they

are bound to co-operate. In England and Ireland the difference of

longitude is so small, that, by the Sovereign’s command, it is made

mid-day at the same moment in both kingdoms. In the United States,

something more than human power would be required to work out that

wonder, and something more than constitutional prerogative would be

necessary to enforce it. We must take things as they are, and work with

the means and in the space which are allowed. If we cannot expect

national interference in behalf of prison discipline, we certainly may

appeal to the State in which we live to exercise and dignify its

sovereignty by legislation that will adapt prisons and their discipline

to the use of society, and while the House is one of penal discipline,

it shall be a place of moral improvement. We scarcely expect the

Legislature of the State to initiate the good work. It is the duty of

those who feel most anxious for its establishment, to prepare the means

and present the arguments; and it is believed that no means of inducing

a systematic arrangement of prison discipline throughout the State

exists outside this Society. Persons abound who see and deplore the

evils of the present want of system, but they lack the full information,

and especially do they lack concurrent action; and it is believed that

the establishment of auxiliary societies throughout the State would

produce the ends proposed, viz., properly constructed prisons, the

establishment and maintenance of proper discipline; and the whole

co-operative and correspondent, each with the other, till the system

work, with regard to the government, as perfectly in Pennsylvania as it

does in Great Britain, and much more effective in the interest of

humanity and virtue. We have little to change, excepting the structures

of our prisons, and the consequent classification and treatment of

prisoners; little to unlearn in their management; we are not wedded to

any past theory. It is generally admitted, that much of what this

Society condemns is wrong; the only doubt, or supposed difficulty, is

how it can be remedied. That doubt and that difficulty will be removed

when auxiliary Societies shall be established to correct and embody

public sentiment, and when the parent Society, through its branches,

shall be allowed to bring its moral action into co-operation with the

physical efforts of the Commonwealth, to alleviate the miseries of

public prisons.

------------------

The Journal of Prison Discipline and Philanthropy (New Series, No. 3, January 1864) · 第 29 / 56 题