Sec. I. GENERAL

If ever the counties of England recover their bygone loyalty to their

own materials and their old traditions, then cob-building will return to

Devon and the West. Cheap bricks, cheap transport, and the ignoble rage

for fashions from the town went far to oust provincial cob from the

affections of those whom, with their forbears, it had housed so well for

several centuries.

Whether the new loyalty be from within, or be imposed from without by

force of circumstances, matters little. What does matter is the fact of

its revival.

For with it will come again the building of cottages that are knit

intimately to their sites and surroundings as of old, cottages

consanguineous with the ground they stand on, be it brick-earth, rock,

or common soil.

The soil of Devonshire and of many parts of Wessex and of Wales serves

excellently well for building in cob or "clom."[3]

[Footnote 3: Probably, indeed, there is no county in the kingdom

that has not considerable areas where the soil would, if tried,

prove well adapted for cob-building.]

The soil itself suggested the construction, and the men of Wessex were

quick to take the hint and to act on it.

The yeomen and small-holders of earlier days were commonly builders too,

and often built their own homes in their own way, yet by the guiding

light of local tradition.

Thus the old Devonian countryman in need of a house would set to and

build it himself--of stone if that were handy and easily worked, of cob

if it were not.

No doubt the doors and windows would be made and fitted by the village

wheelwright; but the cottager himself would thatch or slate the roof as

naturally and successfully as he built.

The skill and care with which these versatile amateurs built their

houses was not always of the highest, and careless construction, like

other sins, is visited on the children--the worse the sooner.

Thus it is that there are to-day plenty of old cob cottages that are

both damp and insecure, but to condemn cob building in general because

certain old builders were careless, ignorant, or incompetent is to

condemn all materials from wattle and daub to ferro-concrete in the same

breath.

Cob, being a humble, amenable, and thoroughly accommodating substance,

has reaped the inevitable reward of good nature in being "put upon" and

in being asked to stand what is quite beyond its powers of endurance,

and yet Devon cob houses of Elizabethan date are not uncommon.

It is very reasonable in its demands, but two things it does

require--dry foundations and a good protecting roof.

To quote an old Devonshire saw on cob--"Giv'un a gude hat and pair of

butes an' 'er'l last for ever."

In many instances the Devonshire leaseholder, usually only a

"life-lease" holder, built badly and on indifferent foundations. He

neglected to repair his thatch, with the consequence that ruin followed

sooner or later. He did not always use rough-cast, so that it often

happened that by the time the lease expired the unfortunate landowner

found that the cottage fell in--in the literal as well as in the legal

sense. The lower portions of the walls were honey-combed with rat-holes,

the walls bulged out or fissures resulted from subsidence, and the

dwelling presented that appearance of squalor and meanness that has led

so many to decry the mud buildings of Devon as relics of bygone

barbarism. But if adequate care is bestowed on the construction, there

is no reason why cob cottages should not prove at one and the same time

comfortable to the inmates and pleasant to the eye, and endure for many

generations.

[Illustration:

+Another view of the Cob House built by Mr. Ernest Gimson,

near Budleigh Salterton, Devon.+

_See Frontispiece_]

[Illustration:

+A fine Specimen of a Devonshire Cob House.+]

[Headnote: The Beauty of Cob]

As to their comeliness and longevity, a day's walk in Devon, or, failing

that, a glance at the printed pictures will tell all that need be told.

That the beauty of cob buildings is not due merely to the irregularities

and weathering produced by the passage of time is sufficiently proved by

the photographs of Mr. Gimson's charming cob cottage, taken soon after

he had finished it.

The work was done a year or two before the war; this is Mr. Gimson's own

description of the manner of its building:

* * *

"The cob was made of the stiff sand found on the site; this was mixed

with water and a great quantity of long wheat straw trodden into it. The

walls were built 3 ft. thick, pared down to 2 ft. 6 in., and were placed

on a plinth standing 18 in. above the ground floor, and built of cobble

stones found among the sand. The walls were given a coat of plaster and

a coat of rough-cast, which was gently trowelled over to smooth the

surface slightly. I believe eight men were engaged on the cobwork, some

preparing the material, and others treading in on to the top of the

walls. It took them about three months to reach the wall plate; the cost

was 6s. a cubic yard, exclusive of the plastering. No centring was used.

The joists rested on plates, and above them the walls were reduced to 2

ft. 2 in. in thickness to leave the ends of the joists free. The beams

also rested on wide plates and the ends were built round with stone,

leaving space for ventilation. Tile or slate lintels were used over all

openings. The cost of the whole house was 6-1/2d. a cubic foot. Building

with cob is soon learnt--of the eight men, only one of them had had any

previous experience, and, I believe, he had not built with it for thirty

years. This is the only house I have built of cob."

* * *

What is most interesting in this narrative is the workmen's lack of

experience, which seems to have been no hindrance. Anyone who proposes

to revive the use of cob may take courage from Mr. Gimson's evidence.

The time spent in building the walls was reasonable and the cost low. It

may be guessed that the post-war rise in cost will be no greater in

proportion, if as great, when compared with brickwork. The natural charm

of the wall surface is enhanced by the crown of thatched roof, modelled

with a skill which few can bring so certainly to their task as Mr.

Gimson.

[Headnote: Method of Building]

Cottage Building in Cob, Pisé, Chalk and Clay: A Renaissance (2nd edition) · 第 26 / 74 题