ROWLAND WINN.

_A Proof that a Man can be his own Grandfather!_--I lately came across

the following curious piece of genealogical reasoning which I think

originally appeared in _Hood's Magazine_, and which I have endeavoured

to illustrate by the annexed table:

George==++

1 2 | ||

William=Anne=Henry ||

| | ||

| _David_ ||

| 1 2 ||

Thomas=Jane=====++

There was a widow (Anne) and her daughter-in-law (Jane), and a man

(George) and his son (Henry). The widow married the son, and the

daughter married the father. The widow was therefore mother (in-law) to

her husband's father, and consequently grandmother to her own husband

(Henry). By this husband she had a son (David), to whom she was

great-grandmother. Now, as the son of a great-grandmother must be either

a grandfather or great uncle, this boy (David) was one or the other. He

was his own grandfather! This was the case with a boy at school at

Norwich.

Notes and Queries, Vol. V, Number 133, May 15, 1852 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 43 / 154 题