SPIRIT OF HIS DOCTRINE.
Mr. Ballou ever strove to make the word and the principles which he
taught appear attractive, by representing them in their appropriate
dress, the livery of joy and peace, and from the principles of fatherly
love and kindness he gathered the strongest motives for humility,
gratitude and obedience. He would tell you that God has written upon the
fragrant flowers of the field, on the breezes that rock them, and the
refreshing sun that nurtures them, indelible tokens of his fatherly
affection, and would refer you to the blooming clover, and the falling
rain, as blessings not to be misconstrued, in God's own hand-writing, a
"way-side sacrament," free to all. He would never tire of depicting the
Almighty through the spirit of the most beautiful emblems in nature, and
ever deducing from them the most amiable and glorious traits of Deity.
The employment he made of the familiar images of nature will remind the
reader of what we have already said touching the influences of his
birth-place. The blue skies, the green pastures, the gushing rivulets,
the everlasting hills that rear their giant summits to the glorious
effulgence of the noon-tide sun, or the cold kiss of the midnight moon,
spoke to his heart a language that his intellect faithfully interpreted.
The constant contemplation of beautiful natural scenery almost
invariably inspires devotional feeling. In the wonderful solitudes of
nature the sneer of the infidel is hushed upon his lips, and the worldly
man forgets the passions, the jealousies, the intrigues, the
heart-burnings and frivolities, of his daily artificial life. But the
heart of the true, thoughtful, right-minded man does something more than
mirror the images presented to his eye. It is not like
"----a sleeping lake,
That takes the hue of cloud and sky,
And only feels its surface break
As birds of passage wander by,
That dip their wing and upward soar,
Leaving it quiet as before."
Before the mind's eye of such a man, the beauties of nature do not glide
away like the figures of a painted panorama, serving only to amuse,
charming the eye for a moment with grace of form and beauty of manner,
and then passing away like an idle dream, the "baseless fabric of a
vision." In the true man, the child of God, the inner, the spiritual
sense is awakened in sympathy with the material organs of vision. For
him each lineament of nature is a revelation, each feature a symbol.
The flowers are to him, as some one has beautifully remarked, the
"alphabet of angels."
We have labored somewhat in these pages, even at the risk of repetition,
to inculcate the idea that Mr. Ballou was one of these students of
nature; and this was the case in a most eminent degree: the teachings
that he received at her feet in youth he garnered up in his heart, to be
repeated, to be illustrated, and illumined with new light from the
brightness of his intellect, to be poured forth again to thousands who
required so eloquent an interpreter. He had learned a lesson he could
never forget, from the beautiful creations of God, of his fatherly
affection. The fierce midnight storm, with its thunder-peals and
lightning-flashes, had no terror for him; he knew better than to
interpret it as a manifestation of the wrath and vengeful fury of the
Deity; for he knew that it was to be followed by a purer and healthier
atmosphere, by the glowing bow of promise, and by brighter smiles from
the unshadowed sun.
In none of the varied phenomena of nature did he behold the God of
wrath, the God of vengeance, the pitiless Deity of the dark theology,
whose horrors he was destined to dissipate and overcome. Far from this.
He deduced from every phase of nature the great truth of the
all-prevailing and inexhaustible love of the Almighty for the children
of his creation. Thus, by the simple symbols and tokens he had
discovered, strewn like flowers along the pathway of life, he sought to
awaken the torpid sense of those "who, having eyes, saw not, and having
ears, heard not," the wonders of the glad tidings the angel-messengers
of the Deity were commissioned to communicate to man.
Mr. Ballou's examples and illustrations of God's unbounded grace and
goodness, as drawn from visible nature, were very frequent. God's word
first, and then God's works, were his strength and shield. Let the
following show his mode of reasoning in this particular. He says:--"If
our Creator has so bountifully provided for our existence here, which is
but momentary, and for our temporal wants, which will all soon be
forgotten, what has he not done for the security of our immortal state,
and for our enjoyment in the everlasting world? Pause, and behold what
boundless scenes of riches and glory are opening to our view in Jesus,
by whom life and immortality are brought to light! We have seen the
brightness of the morning sun, have known the renovating majesty of his
noon-tide rays, have seen a fair creation blest with his universal light
and heat! But this is only a symbol of the Sun of Righteousness; his
brightness is above that of the morning sun, his heat is more renovating
than the rays of the noon. In him our Heavenly Father hath given unto us
eternal life. As the life of the natural is in the sun, so the life of
the moral creation is in Jesus, the light of the world, the life of man.
If the _earth_ be full of the goodness of the Lord, have we not in this
a fair specimen of the rest of his vast creation? Have we any reason to
believe that the _earth_ is more favored with the divine goodness than
any other part or parts of creation? No, surely we have not. All those
worlds which sparkle in the wide expanse of heaven are full of the
goodness of the Lord; and if time be all full of divine goodness, so is
eternity; and if God be universally good temporally speaking, so is he
in relation to spiritual things. What infinite reason have we to
exercise our hearts in gratitude to God, and our affections in love to
him, who giveth us all things richly to enjoy! With what propriety may
we say, 'Let everything that hath breath praise the Lord!'"
Observe how vastly different was the effect produced by the tenets of
faith preached by many around him! How far from lovable was the
portraiture drawn of God and Heaven by those who held forth the creed of
the old school!
How many preachers of this school have won their ephemeral reputations
solely by awakening the terrors of their auditors, and have been
esteemed great in proportion to their ability to produce fainting,
convulsions, tears and groans, among women and children! The perverted
vision of such men rests on no image of nature, except such as they can
distort to symbolize some imaginary dreadful attribute in the God of
their theology. He is clothed by them in storms and clouds, as the
heathen Jove was depicted grasping in his hand a sheaf of thunderbolts.
From their portraiture every gleam of light is excluded,--it is a murky
and repulsive mass of shadows. The gentle and fragrant flowers, the
sweet perfumes and rainbow colors with which the face of nature is so
prodigally decked, claim no word or thought of theirs; they cannot
employ these images in their illustrations, they cannot reconcile them
with their gloomy theories,--their very existence is unaccountable to
their perverse vision.
"That gloomy, heart-dejecting something," says Mr. Ballou, "which has
been maintained in our world at an incalculable expense of treasure, of
comfort, peace and joy,--at the expense, also, of the tender charities
of the heart, and the benevolent sentiments of the soul,--though called
religion, is all counterfeit. It has drawn a sable curtain over the
mildly radiant countenance of our Father in heaven, and in room of
leading the mind to contemplate the Divine Being with pleasure and
delight, it has attached a horror to the sacred name, which gives a
stupefying chill to the heart, repels the mind, and forces it to seek
relief in the contemplation of visible and sensible objects; and after
becoming the author of this horror and disgust in the soul, it artfully
takes the advantage of the deception, to inculcate a belief that the
reason of these feelings is the natural depravity of the human heart!
Such are the views which youth are led to entertain of religion, that
they contemplate it as something calculated to deprive them of their
present comforts, and only useful as it relates to a state of existence
hereafter, where, as a recompense for sacrifices which they make of
happiness in this world, they are to receive extensive and lasting
blessings. With such reflections, it is natural to delay the concerns
of religion as long as possible, with an intention to submit to its
unpleasant requirements in season to win the prize. This is evidently
the reason why youth are so little inclined to employ their thoughts on
divine things, and to prefer amusements and trifling vanities to the
acquisition of Christian knowledge.
"But true religion presents the Father of our spirits as the most lovely
character of which the mind can possibly conceive. It directs to the
contemplation of that almighty power which controls a universe, and to
view all its elements in harmony with the unchangeable love of God to
his creatures. In youth, while the heart is tender, and sensibility
quick and lively, what an exquisite delight the mind is capable of
enjoying, by penetrating through visible objects and the beauty of
temporal things, to the contemplation of that wisdom, power and
goodness, which are manifest through the medium of these outward forms!
If the fragrance of the rose can so gratefully delight the sense, how
much greater is the pleasure to the rational mind which flows from the
consideration of that wisdom and goodness which gave this power to the
rose, and this capacity to sense! From this single item let the mind
glance through all creation, and freely indulge the reflection that the
universe is as full of the divine goodness as the rose or the lily of
the valley. Freed from superstition, what heart would not be charmed
with the character which the Saviour gives of our Heavenly Father?
'Behold the fowls of the air; for they sow not, neither do they reap,
nor gather into barns, yet your Heavenly Father feedeth them. Are ye not
much better than they? Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow;
they toil not, neither do they spin; and yet I say unto you that even
Solomon, in all his glory, was not arrayed like one of these.'"
These mute, but beautiful and eloquent testimonials of their Maker's
love and gentleness, would rebuke the dogmatism of the schools; and
hence they naturally avoid to mention the graceful, refined and touching
features of nature. They prefer rather to revel in their own dark and
unwarrantable conceptions of a future state, to gloat over the
prospective agony of their brethren, to conjure up horrid pictures of
future suffering and woe, and madly to pronounce all as being necessary
to the full glory of God, and the exemplification of his almighty power.
What wonder, then, that thousands, turning with loathing and shuddering
from the image of a deity clothed with all the repugnant attributes of
the most debased humanity, plunge into hopeless unbelief, refusing all
credence in such a being, and in any future state whatever? Was it not a
Herculean task to combat the immemorial and prescriptive dogmas of
powerful and learned preachers, armed with all the rhetorical imagery of
the schools for working terror and despair in the hearts of their
listeners?
Again Mr. Ballou says:--
"The preacher of the old school exhorts his hearers, above all things,
to the practice of the most rigid self-denial; and assures them that
God will be highly pleased with their abstaining from those pleasures
which he has placed within their reach. The most innocent amusements,
the most harmless recreations, he declaims against with the utmost
vehemence, as damning sins. He considers religion essentially to consist
in a perpetual effort to suppress and eradicate that propensity to
acquire temporal happiness which the God of nature has made to be the
spring of our actions. But on no subject does he delight to dwell so
much as on the future punishment of the wicked and impenitent. He
dresses up the Father of the universe in the awful robes of eternal
wrath and unbounded indignation, filled with incessant anger at the
crimes of the wicked, exerting infinite wisdom in devising the modes and
augmenting the severity of their punishment.
"The eternal din of future punishment soon loses all effect in
frightening the people, and has no influence but to impress a melancholy
gloom on their minds. Mankind are to be animated to strive to enter the
gates of heaven by the love of God and of goodness. He who attempts it
through fear of damnation exhibits no evidence of holiness of heart. As
well may we call a man honest who, having an inclination to steal,
refrains for fear of the whip, as we may a man religious, who, having
vicious inclinations, restrains them, and conforms to the exteriors of
religion, for the purpose of escaping the flames of hell. It is matter
of much regret that the amiable religion of Christianity should be so
disfigured and misrepresented as to deprive many people of the
happiness of enjoying it. Jesus Christ has in the clearest manner
inculcated those duties which are productive of the highest moral
felicity, and consistent with all the innocent enjoyments to which we
are impelled by the dictates of nature. Religion, when fairly considered
in its genuine simplicity and uncorrupted state, is the source of
endless rapture and delight. But, when corrupted with denials,
mortifications, and a punctilious observance of external rites, it
assumes a form disgusting to men of taste, and a relish for social
happiness, and is productive of the most destructive consequences. It
drives one part of mankind into the practice of superstition, hypocrisy
and bigotry; and, by exciting a distaste and aversion in the minds of
the other part, it excludes them from the rational pleasure arising from
the practice of genuine religion. The road to heaven is pleasant and
delightful, if mankind will go the right way; and certainly God will bid
the saint as sincere a welcome to the realms of immortal felicity who
has in the journey of life tasted the temporal delights of innocence, as
he will him who has abstained from them. Why, then, should we leave the
path that is strewed with flowers and roses, for the purpose of going in
another through a wilderness beset with thorns and briars, when both
parts will terminate in the same happy country?"
People listen to the dogmas of the schools, and are filled with awful
forebodings; terror is the predominating principle in their bosoms, and
sorrow takes possession of their hearts, speaking out from their
faithful countenances in sadness. How far is the true influence of the
gospel from inducing such results as this! Mr. Ballou believed, with
Fenelon, that "true piety hath in it nothing weak, nothing sad, nothing
constrained. It enlarges the heart; it is simple, free, and attractive."
If this were not the true nature of the gospel, how could there be
"peace and joy in believing"?
He held that the true way to cleanse the hardened and rebellious heart
is to inundate it with a deluge of love, the only weapon of Omnipotence.
Reason with the sinner, he will meet you with subtle argument; threaten
him, and he will meet you blow for blow; against future interest he will
adroitly balance present pleasure. The human heart rises against
severity or oppression, while it is soothed by gentleness, as the waves
of the ocean rise in proportion to the violence of the winds, and sink
with the breeze, until it becomes a gentle zephyr, into mildness and
serenity. Love, the warm sunshine of our existence, subdues the sinner
at once; there is not one in a thousand whose heart is so hardened that
its genial warmth will not melt it. True it is that force can subdue
numbers, cunning conquers force, intellect can master cunning, but love
conquers all. There is a vast difference between a wounded heart and a
contrite spirit. You may break ice by force into a thousand pieces,--it
is ice still; but expose it to the warm sun, and behold! how quickly it
will melt!
We have enlarged somewhat upon this doctrine of divine love, and trust
that our readers will bear with us in our desultory career, since this
principle is the fundamental basis of Universalism,--the starting-point
and the goal, the Alpha and the Omega, of Mr. Ballou's spiritual
experience and teaching. By it he reconciled the impulses of his heart
and the promptings of his intellect. The principle of God's perfect,
unchanging and eternal love of man, was the great discovery of his
earliest manhood, the object of his self-imposed mission, the
inspiration and solace of his labors, the spirit and joy of his
existence. His adamantine belief in this great idea, daily strengthening
by the study of God's works and word, was his shield and spear. It
touched his lips with living fire, as he stood in the pulpit, or beneath
the blue canopy of heaven, where he often preached; in the solitude of
his study, in the busy haunts of men, it fed the flickering lamp of life
when it waned with severe exertion, and it shone like the brightest star
of heaven on his dying bed. It was no solitary joy; the treasure he had
found he journeyed through the land to share with others. From his lips
the glad tidings rang through every nook and corner; and he lived, as we
have seen, long enough to hear the accents caught up by the willing and
faithful watchmen of the gospel, and the cry of "All's well!" echo from
port to port, from battlement to battlement, on the castles of Zion,
through the vast circumference of his native land. He saw his
denominational congregation swollen from a little band of eager
listeners to an auditory numbering hundreds of thousands. He saw the
shadows of unbelief flying from the face of truth, as the mist of
morning disappears before the rising sun. And he felt joyful, but not
proud or elated, in the consciousness that his sacred mission had been
crowned with such complete success, and that multitudes recognized the
truth which he first enunciated, that _the law of God was the law of
love_.
But let us give place here to his own words, beautifully expressed, and
illustrating his belief, and the _spirit_ of his doctrine, as appears in
a poem he wrote upon this theme, some years since. It is entitled
GOD IS LOVE.
"When lovely Spring, with flowery wreaths,
Comes on young Zephyr's wing,
And every bird soft music breathes,
'Tis love that makes them sing.
Love blossoms on the forest trees,
And paints each garden flower,
Gives honey to the laboring bees
In every sylvan bower.
Love breathes in every wind that blows,
And fragrance fills the air;
Meanders in each stream that flows,
Inviting pleasures there.
Love brings the golden harvest in,
And fills her stores with food;
It moves ten thousand tongues to sing
Of universal good."
"If we believe that God so loved us that he sent his Son to die for us,
we ought to love one another," he says. "Shall I not love those objects
whom my God loves? Shall I not love all those for whose sins he sent his
Son to be a propitiation? Most assuredly. This is a consequence
naturally to be expected from our belief. I do not say that all who
profess the doctrine do love one another as they ought; but I have the
confidence to say that no one who possesses the real sentiment, the real
principle, in his heart, can do otherwise than love all mankind. And
here you will easily perceive that all the commandments of the gospel
are to be obeyed. For when we love one another and love God, what duty
is there that will be neglected? If this will not lead us to our duty,
what will? Will terror make us do our duty? No; for, referring once more
to the similitude, what drove your children away? It was believing the
story they were told of your character. What _brought_ them back?
Knowing you were good. And know you not that it is _the goodness of God
that leadeth to repentance_? Why, then, should not his goodness be
preached to sinners? Why should we be told such awful stories with
regard to eternity? Why should we be told that there is an everlasting
state of burning, in order to induce us to love our Father in heaven? O!
incongruous doctrine! Let it be banished from the world, and let the
angel of the covenant proclaim the love of God to mankind; and may the
world be converted. Man will then love his fellow-man; we shall all see
that we are the children of God, that we are all the objects of God's
love, and all the objects of our Saviour's grace. Believe this truth,
treasure it up in your hearts, let your affections move with assent,
love God and love one another, and the God of love and peace shall be
with you."
All his writings and all of his conversation, both public and private,
were thoroughly imbued with this belief and principle of universal love;
it ran like a golden stratum through all his life and conduct, imbuing
every sentiment and every thought. His doctrine was such that a
realizing sense of its character must invariably thus affect the firm
and relying believer. He never held forth dark threats, nor adopted,
like many preachers about him, the doleful tones of grief when he talked
about religion. "If good people," says Archbishop Usher, "would make
their goodness agreeable, and smile instead of frowning in their virtue,
how many would they win to the good cause!" Mr. Ballou was affected, in
his cheerful and happy belief of universal salvation, like Haydn, who,
in answer to a query of the poet Carpani, how it happened that his
church music was ever of an animating and cheerful character,
answered,--"I cannot make it otherwise. I write according to the
thoughts which I feel;--when I think upon God, my heart is so full of
joy that the notes dance and leap as it were from my pen."
How many there are among us who, the moment the subject of religion is
mentioned, put on long faces, and talk as if they were mourning their
own lot and that of all creation, "in hopes to merit heaven by making
earth a hell!" Such people, by their example and bearing, would lead us
to believe that churches are institutions reared for the purpose of
encouraging long faces and dyspepsia, instead of pure altars from whence
may ascend the glad incense of grateful hearts. How strongly it is
impressed upon us that "God loves the _cheerful_ giver!" and did not
Christ reproach the Pharisees for disfiguring their faces with a sad
countenance? To use the forcible language of another, they make of
themselves "Hypocrites, who, to persuade men that angels lodge in their
hearts, hang out a devil for a sign in their countenances." "It is quite
deplorable," says Lady Morgan, "to see how many rational creatures, or
at least who are thought so, mistake suffering for sanctity, and think a
sad face and a gloomy habit of mind propitious offerings to that Deity
whose works are all light and lustre, and harmony and loveliness."
Such was the philosophy of the subject of these memoirs, such his
religion, such the doctrine which he taught. He found no cause for
sorrow in his belief, but a never-failing fountain of joy ever welled up
in his breast, pure and sparkling.
Mr. Ballou's religious belief, the faith which he promulgated with such
zeal and wonderful effect, can be summed up in a few words. He held that
God judges the human family in the earth; that every man must receive
according to the sin he hath done, and that there is no respect of
persons. That the "righteous shall be recompensed in the earth, much
more the wicked and the sinner." That the future state of existence will
be one of unalloyed happiness for the whole human family. That God is a
being who governs the world with a parent's regard, and not with the
wrath of a tyrant; that the world could be led to love him, but never
driven to do it through fear. That love, not wrath, should be preached
to the people. That all punishment is designed by the Divine Spirit for
the reformation of the sinner, and consequently must take place where
the sin is committed. That the reward of good deeds is to encourage well
doing, and must come when and where the worthy acts are done. He
believed in no more dreadful hell than is produced by the consequences
of sin about us, with the still, bitter gnawings of conscience; and in
no sweeter or more desirable reward than an approving conscience, and
the natural consequences of doing good. He taught that man must be saved
from his _sins_, not from the _punishment_ of them,--_that_ is
impossible,--and that to be happy we must "do justly, love mercy, and
walk humbly with God."
He believed that, in order to prove that misery will exist in the future
or eternal state, it must first be made to appear that sin will exist in
that state. But this he did not believe could be proved from any
scriptural testimony; on the contrary, he was fully convinced that the
Bible taught that "He that is dead is freed from sin." To quote his own
words on this point: "We have shown, in order for justice to require the
endless misery of any moral being, it must, of necessity, require the
endless continuance of sin, than which nothing can be more absurd."
Again he says: "We have sufficiently argued that man cannot be miserable
in consequence of moral condemnation, any longer than he is, in a moral
sense, a sinner." And we have often heard him make the remark, in regard
to limited future punishment, that if any one would produce but only one
passage of scripture which proves, beyond a reasonable doubt, that sin
or the sinner will exist, as such, in the eternal, immortal state, then
I give up my doctrine of no future punishment; but until this is done, I
shall hold to the doctrine that the Scriptures do not teach the
principle even of a limited future punishment. Mr. Ballou would not
allow analogy to take the place of scriptural proof on so important a
subject as the destiny of man in the immortal state. He had nothing to
do with mere assertions, which had not a "thus saith the Lord" for their
support, on any doctrinal point.
This feature of his mind cannot be too strongly insisted upon. He was
not content with relying on the _spirit_ of the Scriptures, which would
have fully sustained his doctrine, but he conciliated the spirit and the
letter, and rested every proposition he advanced on this immutable and
impregnable basis. If ever a man strictly obeyed the injunction to
"search the Scriptures," it was Mr. Ballou. They were the armor from
which he drew the shield that sheltered him in conflict, and all the
shafts that garnished his quiver. He had the very words of Christ and
his apostles for every item of his creed, and such creed alone would he
accept as might be adapted to this standard. He was not one of those
self-complacent and easy theorists, who readily support their favorite
doctrine by a few ambiguous texts, or an arbitrary construction of a
mooted passage. He was far too conscientious for this; the language of
learned commentators, however elegant the phraseology and plausible the
reason, never satisfied him. His standard was fixed in the Bible.
There was little of the enthusiast,--to use the term in its common
acceptation,--nothing of the bigot and fanatic, in his nature. He first
convinced himself of the truth of his ideas; he reflected and pondered
them deeply by himself, in some of those abstracted moods peculiar to
him, examining them in every light, trying them by every test,
dispassionately and calmly; and then gave them to the world, armed at
all points, and ready for defence against attack. And how prompt and
ready he was to defend what he had satisfied himself was the truth, we
need not reiterate here. The language in which he enforced his arguments
was simple and clear, because his ideas were so. They needed not the
tinsel garb of rhetoric, the flowers of a refined oratory, to make them
presentable to the world; they needed no foreign or artificial aid;--no,
they stood forth clear, simple, strong, arrayed in the garb and radiant
with the light of truth and of nature. They stood the test of public
scrutiny, because they had been refined in the alembic of his own severe
and critical mind. This simplicity, which is fast becoming an
old-fashioned virtue, commended the preacher to the earnest seekers
after truth. It is a pretty fair inference to arrive at, when you hear a
religion preached which requires disguise and ornament, that the truth
is not in it. Where truth is there need be no such garbing; it is only
error that requires to be gilded, like the covering to bitter pills,
used to render them sweet. The gospel of Christ appeals to the judgment,
not to the taste.
In relation to the argument of analogy, as used to prove the doctrine of
punishment in a future state, we subjoin the following, in his own
words:--"Another ground on which the advocates of a future state of
rewards and punishments place much dependence for the support of the
doctrine, they denominate _analogy_. We think it too hazardous to
attempt anything like an accurate statement of the particular arguments,
which are made to depend on this principle, in favor of this doctrine;
for we might be liable to some mistakes, which would represent the views
of its advocates differently from their mode of representing them. Our
liability to misrepresent in such an attempt seems unavoidable, on
account of the fact that there has been nothing like a system of
reasoning yet exhibited on the general subject. We feel safe, however,
in saying, that, as far as we have been informed, those who rely on what
they call analogy to support the doctrine of future retribution, hold
that, in all respects which are necessary to carry sin and its miseries
into the future state, that state will be analogous to this mode of
being. So that, reasoning from analogy, as moral agents sin, and
thereby render themselves miserable in this world, the same moral agents
may continue to do the same in the world to come. In connection with
this argument it is urged, that, as it is evident to our senses that sin
often escapes a just retribution in this world, it must be recompensed
in another state, or divine justice must forever be deprived of its
claims.
"On reasonings of such a character, we shall use the freedom to say,
that they appear to have no higher authority than mere human
speculations injudiciously managed. That they are nothing more than
simple speculations, is evident from the fact that they are not founded
on any divine authority. We presume that their own advocates never
ventured to support them by scripture authority. And that they are
managed injudiciously, is very apparent from the circumstances, that
while they profess to be justified by the principle of analogy, they are
a direct denial of the very analogy on which they depend. Theologians
who endeavor to exert an influence over the minds of people by means of
these speculations, are constantly urging that in this world we see sin
procuring for its agents the riches and honors of the world, while it
escapes judicial detection, and goes unpunished. Now, if they were
consistent with their analogy and with themselves, they would see at
once that in the next state of existence sin will procure for its agents
the riches and honors of that world, and there, as well as here, escape
judicial detection, and go unpunished. They would likewise see that as
divine justice can quiet its own claims in this world, without
administering a full and adequate retribution of human conduct, it may
do the same in the future state. In this way we might proceed and make
the future state precisely like the present; for we have no more
authority for carrying sin and its miseries into a future world, than we
have for carrying all other things into that state which we find in
this. Reasoning from all that we know, we must believe that, so long as
men sin, they will do so from the beguiling power of temptation. If,
then, we believe that sin will exist in the future state, we must
suppose that temptation will there act on the mind with a deceiving
influence. In this world the wicked are allured with the hopes of
temporal gain, and these attractions are strengthened by the belief that
crime will not be detected, and that punishment will be avoided. Were it
not for these hopes and allurements, no wrong-doing would be practised
in this world; and to suppose that we shall transgress the law of God in
the future world, without any temptation, is a speculation altogether
arbitrary and capricious, as well as contrary to _analogy_."
"Of late, the writer of this," says Mr. Ballou, in one of his last
published sermons, "has seen an inclination, in some of the professed
preachers of Universalism, to adopt some of the peculiar opinions of our
Unitarian fraternity. Among other things, is the opinion that men carry
into the next world the imperfections of this; so that their moral
condition hereafter will depend on the characters they form while here
in the flesh; but that they may and will improve and progress in virtue
and holiness in the spirit world. This opinion being rather newly
adopted, and as it seems to ingratiate them into favor with Unitarians,
it is quite natural for such preachers to devote not a small share of
public labor to lead the minds of their hearers to the adoption of such
views of the future state. Whenever the writer of this discourse comes
in contact with these labors and opinions, he feels it to be his duty,
in a friendly, brotherly, and candid manner, to endeavor to bring them
to the test of some acknowledged standard. It is worthy of
consideration, that the New Testament gives us but little on the subject
of man's future state. There can be no doubt but Jesus was known to
believe and preach a doctrine embracing the fact of the resurrection,
and an immortal state for the human family. All this is clearly
manifested by the question asked him by the Sadducees respecting the
resurrection. In the answer which Jesus returned, we have all which
gives us any account respecting the state of man hereafter which was
spoken by him. In this answer, we are told the following facts:--1st.
That, in the future world, they will neither marry nor be given in
marriage. 2d. That, in that state, men will be the children of God,
being the children of the resurrection. 3d. That they will be equal unto
the angels, and that they can die no more. 4th. That the doctrine of
the resurrection was shown by Moses, and that God is not the God of the
dead, but of the living, for we all live unto him. St. Paul says more on
the subject of the resurrection, and of the future state, than did
Jesus. He says, 'As in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made
alive.' He also distinguishes man's state and condition in the future or
resurrection state, from his condition here, as follows:--'It is sown in
corruption, it is raised in incorruption: it is sown in dishonor, it is
raised in glory: it is sown in weakness, it is raised in power: it is
sown a natural body, it is raised a spiritual body.' Thus we are taught
that our future state will differ from the present as incorruption
differs from corruption; as glory differs from dishonor; as power
differs from weakness; as a spiritual body differs from a natural body.
Now, if we allow ourselves to carry our speculations respecting our
future state not only beyond all the Scriptures say on the subject, but
so as to adopt distinctions in that state, which evidently conflict with
the divine Word, do we not say, by so doing, that divine Revelation is
not only incomplete, but also inaccurate?"
He believed that all those promises which give the assurance of the
final _holiness_ and _happiness_ of the entire race of man depend solely
on the will and power and goodness of God, and not on any conditions for
the creature to perform. While dwelling upon this theme, which he
delighted to do, he says:--"Let us pass to the prophecies of Isaiah; see
Chap. 25: 6, 7, 8.
"'And in this mountain shall the Lord of Hosts make unto _all_ people a
feast of fat things. * * * And he will destroy in this mountain the face
of the covering cast over all people, and the vail that is spread over
all nations. He will swallow up death in victory; and the Lord God will
wipe away tears from off all faces; and the rebuke of his people shall
he take away from off all the earth: for the Lord hath spoken it.' No
one will doubt that the provisions here spoken of are those which are
provided in the gospel of salvation,--made for all people. The vail of
darkness which is over all people is to be taken away. Death is to be
swallowed up in victory, and tears wiped from off all faces. The rebuke
of God's people shall be taken from off all the earth. And the proof is
in the above passage, 'for the Lord hath spoken it.'"
Mr. Ballou says:--"I look with strong expectation for that period when
all sin, and every degree of unreconciliation, will be destroyed, by the
divine power of that love which is stronger than death, which many
waters cannot quench, nor the floods drown; in which alone I put my
trust, and in which my hope is anchored for all mankind; earnestly
praying that the desire of the righteous may not be cut off. The fulness
of times will come, and the times of the restitution of all things will
be accomplished. Then shall truth be victorious, and all error flee to
eternal night. Then will universal songs of honor be sung to the praise
of Him who liveth for ever and ever."
In relation to the subject of his faith, Rev. A. A. Miner, in his
funeral sermon delivered on the occasion, says:--
"Let me say, then, that he was _a man of unswerving faith_. He believed
in the Bible as the treasury of divine revelation. His ministry was
based upon it. Few men have confined themselves so exclusively to its
themes. None have treated those themes with greater clearness and power.
He studied the sacred page with a spirit equally removed from the
Germanic philosophy, on the one hand, and from Calvinistic bigotry on
the other. In the fulness of its promises, the riches of its grace, and
the blessedness of its hopes, his soul continually delighted. It was to
him the 'Book of books;' and, at the advanced age of more than fourscore
years, its truths, still fresh in his memory, continually employed his
understanding, and its glories enraptured his heart.
"He believed also in God;--in God as the supreme good. He believed in
him as sovereign,--not simply as a candidate for sovereignty, but as
already sovereign; nor alone as sovereign to create, to uphold, to rule,
to condemn, and to chasten or destroy. So far had the _world's_ faith
gone. He regarded him as sovereign, not to do evil, but to do good, and
to do good only. He believed God limited by his very nature to the doing
of good,--that he is no more able to do evil than he is to be untrue.
And, since it is admitted, on all hands, that there are moral influences
by which some will be saved in perfect harmony with the exercise of
their own voluntary powers, he believed that a God who is really
sovereign in his moral domain can accomplish in all souls whatever is
possible to be accomplished in any. Thus, from the character of God he
saw freely flowing the blessed promises of his word.
"His faith, too, in Christ stood related to the affectionate Father as
the sovereign cause. Christ was God's messenger to man. He came not to
procure the Father's love for the world, but as a testimony of that
love. He came not to open to man the door of mercy, but to strengthen
man to walk in the already open door. His mission was not simply to
explore the wide-spread moral waste, but to possess and cultivate it;
not to make salvation possible, but actual; for God 'hath appointed him
_heir_ of all things,'--'hath given all things into his hands, that he
should give eternal life to as many as God had given him.' Thus it was
his mission to _accomplish_ a work, rather than to _offer_ to accomplish
it; and, by his ever-memorable prayer on the cross, he perfected the
power by which the world will be saved; as he said, 'And I, if I be
lifted up from the earth, _will draw all men unto me_.'"
No one who has thus far followed this unpretending but truthful
biography, can fail to admit the full justice of the foregoing analysis
and eulogy of Mr. Ballou's moral and mental nature. The faith of which
Mr. Miner speaks was the strongest characteristic of the man. It
illumined his whole life. His intellect was not clouded by doubts. In
the geniality and genuineness of his faith he proceeded to the study of
the book of books; every leaf he turned in the sacred volume confirmed
the steadfast belief of his soul. He read it not as a verbal critic, not
as a worldly philosopher, ambitious to found some system on the hints he
might discover, but as a Christian seeking, where he knew he should
discover it, the eternal light of truth. It was, indeed, to him a source
of unsullied, uncloying, constant delight. Daily and hourly he
discovered new beauties and new truths in its pages. Its story rolled
before him like a wave of unbroken harmony, until his mental vision
became almost microscopic in its powers of detection. Thus filled with
the word, thus made conversant with its glowing truths and beauties, he
constantly renewed and multiplied the means of awakening and confirming
faith in others.
As we have labored to show, his reverence and love for his Maker were
boundless; they absorbed his whole being--not, however, to the exclusion
of earthly objects of affection, for he well knew that a true love of
our Father in heaven is totally incompatible with the neglect of his
creatures. Therefore, he was as unlike as possible to those ascetics of
the middle ages, or the recluses of our own day, who fancy that a strict
seclusion from the world, and a complete abandonment to religious
exercises, is the most acceptable offering that can be made at the foot
of the altar. This was an idea that found no sympathy in his bosom; he
knew that there was nothing inharmonious between religious and social
duties, and that to love our fellow-creatures is a proof of love towards
God. His devotion was filial, but of that transcendent nature which far
surpasses all the affections of this world. His boundless love of God
rested on his vivid conception of his nature, as all-powerful,
all-merciful, and all-good, the enthroned sovereign of the universe, the
Father and Benefactor of each and all of the human race.
In a recent letter to the "Star in the West," Rev. George H. Emerson
says:--
"The theological mission of Hosea Ballou was this:--_to assert the
benevolent and perfect sovereignty of Almighty God_. I once said to him,
'Suppose the idea of God's sovereignty were taken out of you, how much
would there be left of you?' His answer was significant, and comprised
three words,--'_O my soul!_' Of course, these three words, of themselves
simply, convey no answer; but the tone with which they were uttered
said, very distinctly, that, the idea of God's sovereignty taken away,
there would be no Hosea Ballou. But this great man did not simply
believe that God is a sovereign, but, further, that God is a
_benevolent_ sovereign; he not only believed that God ruled in the
armies of heaven and among the inhabitants of the earth, but that he
ruled them with the especial object of bestowing happiness; he not only
believed that God worked all things after the counsels of his own will,
but that it was God's will that all should be saved and come to a
knowledge of the truth. Every one who has heard or read him will
recollect how frequently he would illustrate his views of the divine
government by the beautiful story of Joseph and his ten brethren:--'But
as for you, _ye_ thought evil against me; but _God_ meant it unto good,
to bring to pass as it is this day, to save much people alive.' This
verse contained volumes of meaning with Father Ballou."
Such was the sum and substance of his doctrine, his life-long mission,
the creed he held forth to the people for more than sixty years.
Some of his religious opponents have frequently charged him with
card-playing, an amusement which we conceive to be of no evil import in
itself, but the charge was designed as a matter of reproach against him.
Now, we happen to know, and can say for a certainty, that Mr. Ballou did
not know one card from another, nor could he have named a dozen cards
rightly, had his very life depended upon his doing so.
This may be thought, perhaps, a trifling matter to notice; but the truth
is, his religious opponents, finding no evil in him that they might
expose, invented this charge to prejudice the public mind, and one
minister in New England more than once publicly declared it from his
pulpit; though, when called upon by one who heard him, and who knew the
subject of this biography, he was puzzled to produce the name of his
informant. It is within our own recollection that these stories were
rife, and that they were very generally talked of. It was also
sneeringly said that he preached to the lowest classes of society, and
that respectable or intelligent persons never attended his meetings;
that some of the most wicked and sinful of the community were found
listening to him, and that they were always welcome!
These declarations were often made as evidences, weighing not alone
against him, but also against the truth and godly character of his
doctrine; they were preferred by clergymen from their pulpits, and often
in opposition religious papers; but, of course, this was more frequently
the case during his early settlement in Boston than in subsequent years.
The first part of the latter charge brought against him needs no
refutation; an intelligent public can judge of its truth; but we cannot
refrain from calling the attention of the reader to the spirit that
prompted the last clause. How very like it is to that evinced by the
Pharisees of old, who said reproachfully of their Divine Master, "This
man receiveth sinners and eateth with them." And now mark the reply of
Jesus to these grumblers:--"The whole," says he, "need not the
physician, but they that are sick." "The most wicked and sinful of the
community," said Mr. Ballou's revilers, "are found listening to him, and
they are always welcome!"
The truth is, that Mr. Ballou made no distinction or selection among
auditors; he as readily preached to the poor and humble, as to those
"clad in purple and fine linen," who "fared sumptuously every day." He
never withheld his services; it might be, perhaps, that he preached with
more fervor to those who stood in the clearest need of consolation and
good tidings, than to those who enjoyed every opportunity of mental and
intellectual culture. But it is certain, that a preacher with the
universality of Mr. Ballou's vocation neither can nor ought to draw
distinctions; he is summoned to speak whenever and wherever his services
are needed, and the preacher of the gospel who should refuse because the
call came from the sinful would be as much to blame as he would be to
disregard the call of the righteous. The true soldier of Christ and the
gospel recognizes no distinction of rank; his consolations are as warmly
given to the nameless sufferer, as when beside the couch of the
millionaire.
Still less is the minister of the true religion to refuse to afford
words of encouragement and advice to the unfortunate being who is
struggling in the toils of sin. To such an one his mission is absolutely
imperative; he must wrestle with the perturbed and darkened spirit, he
must aid the awakening conscience, struggling to throw off the burthen
of evil passions, he must point to the undying love of God to man, and
bid the tears of the sinner be dried up in the effulgent smile of
Omnipotence. If, therefore, sinners crowded to hear the discourses of
Mr. Ballou, it was a tribute of which a preacher of the gospel might
well be proud. "To comfort and help the weak-hearted, and to raise up
those who fall," is essentially the province of the conscientious
preacher; and no one, however hardened his heart, could have listened to
the sincere and earnest words of the subject of these pages, without
deriving some hope, some consolation, and some strength, from the
glorious doctrine he preached so eloquently; and that there were very
many who were thus ransomed from the thraldom of sin and consequent
misery, there can be no reasonable doubt.
Was it true that "sinners flocked to hear him," as has been said so
often by his opponents in the way of reproach against his doctrine, as
being conducive to the pleasure of such persons? Let us pause for one
moment, and review what he used to say that was particularly pleasing to
this class of hearers. The following, for instance, will suffice us,--it
is from his own pen:--"The vile affections of sin will burn to the
destruction of the sweetest harmonies of nature; the whitest robes of
innocence are stained with its indelible crimson; the soul is drowned in
the black waters of iniquity, and the whole mind, with every faculty, is
plunged into the hell of moral death. Yet, listen to the worst of
torments, in consequence of sin. 'A wounded conscience who can bear?' A
fire that burns all the day long, a sword that continually pierceth the
soul, a sting that cannot exhaust its poison, a fever that never turns
till the patient dies. 'A dart struck through his liver.' What ails the
sinner?--why his hand on his breast? There gnaws the worm that never
dies,--there burns the fire that is never quenched. A consciousness of
guilt destroys all the expected comforts and pleasures of sin. How
strange it is that, after a thousand disappointments in succession, men
are not discouraged! O sin! how you paint your face! how you flatter us,
poor mortals, on to death! You never appear to the sinner in your true
character; you make us fair promises, but you never fulfilled one; your
tongue is smoother than oil, but the poison of asps is under your lips;
you have impregnated all our passions with the venom of your poison; you
have spread gloomy darkness over the whole region of the soul; you have
endeavored, with your stupefactive poison, to blunt the sword in the
hands of the cherubim, which, for your sake, keeps us from the tree of
life. A mistaken idea has been entertained of sin, even by professors. I
have often heard sincere ministers preach, in their reproofs to their
hearers, that it was the greatest folly in the world for people to
forego salvation, in a future state, for the comforts and pleasures of
sin in this. Such exhortations really defeat their intentions. The wish
of the honest preacher is, that the wicked should repent of their sins,
and do better; but, at the same time, he indicates that sin, at present,
is more productive of happiness than righteousness; but that the bad
will come in another world,--that, although doing well is a hard way,
yet its advantages will be great in another state. Just as much as any
person thinks sin to be more happifying than righteousness, he is
sinful; his heart esteems it; though in some possible cases, for fear of
the loss of salvation in the world to come, he may abstain from some
outward enormities, yet his heart is full of the desire of doing them.
It is as much the nature of sin to torment the mind, as it is the nature
of fire to burn our flesh. Sin deprives us of every rational enjoyment,
so far as it captivates the mind. It was never able to furnish one drop
of cordial for the soul; her tender mercies are cruelty, and her breasts
of consolation are gall and wormwood."
Mr. Ballou's style of preaching was of a kind calculated to create
regret in the hearer's heart at his own shortcoming, and to plant a
contrite spirit there, rather than fear for the punishment of his sins.
The object of his sermon was not to terrify the sinner, but rather to
lead him into the ways of peace and pleasantness. His sermons were of
the character referred to by Louis XIV., when he told that eminent
preacher, Massillon, "Father, I have heard many great pulpit orators,
and I have been much pleased with them, but every time I hear you I am
exceedingly displeased with myself;" alluding to the sorrow for sin
which Massillon's sermons created in him. This is the true and effectual
style of preaching, such as will convert sinners from the error of their
ways, by inducing a correct feeling in their own bosoms, not by
frightening them out of their senses. Representing before men's eyes
such oceans of wrath that they feel as though they were sinking to
perdition, will undoubtedly lead them sometimes to _profess_ religion,
as a drowning man would catch at a straw; but their profession is made
by instinct, not conviction,--by an undefined consciousness of
necessity, not by any incentive of love.
It might be said of Mr. Ballou's sermons as Thomas Fuller said of
Perkins in his eulogy: "His sermons were not so plain but that the
piously learned did admire them, nor so learned but that the plain did
understand them. Unshelling theological controversies of their school
terms, he made of them plain and wholesome meat for the people."
"Children can understand him," was the constant remark of the
ministering brethren, in relation to Mr. Ballou's sermons; and he has
said often, "If I can make children understand me, then I am satisfied;
for surely it must then be that older minds will comprehend my words."
In this connection we are forcibly reminded of the true incident of the
minister and the child. Forcible, simple as it is!
"Mother," said a little girl, seven years old, "I could not understand
our minister to-day, he said so many hard words. I wish he would preach
so that little girls could understand him; won't he, mother?"
"Yes, I think so, if we ask him."
It was not long after that the little girl's father saw her going over
to the minister's, and calling her back to him, he asked:--
"Where are you going, Emma?"
"I am going over to Mr. ----'s, father," was her innocent reply, "to ask
him to preach small!"
A hint this that many might improve by.
To the place of his birth Mr. Ballou was fondly attached, and often
visited it during the latter years of his life, in company with his
children. He seemed thrice happy among those well-remembered hills and
dales, where "the dreams of youth came back again." Aside from the fact
of its being the home of his childhood, which in itself will strew with
roses the bleakest spot in Christendom, the valley of his nativity had
many picturesque and glowing natural beauties, of a character to impress
the lover of nature with admiration. Here he had set his snares at the
skirts of yonder wood, and here made his morning ablutions in the clear
running brook. Adown the crevices of this huge old rock, when a little
boy, surfeited with the abundance of wild strawberries, he had pressed
out their juice, and adown the green crevices in the mossy stone the red
liquid had made its way. These old stumps, now decayed, and like himself
passing away, once bore the orchard fruit that he had watched with
anxious eye to its ripening. And this mass of rocks, this ruined cellar,
is the only remnant left of the cot where he was born. Not a stone nor a
tree was forgotten,--not one but brought back its peculiar legend to his
quickened heart. And here was the old burial-ground, on the hill-side,
where the dust of his father and kindred reposed. With what awe had he
ever looked upon that place when a boy! How many times strolled
thoughtfully among the rank grass and moss-grown slabs, whose gray old
forms, now bending hither and thither with age, gave faint and feeble
token of names long, long since passed away,--
"With uncouth rhymes and shapeless sculpture decked."
While on a visit to this spot, accompanied by his second son, Rev.
Massena B. Ballou, in 1843, he lingered long and thoughtfully among the
tomb-stones, and at last said:--"I believe I could sleep sweeter here,
among the hills of Cheshire, by the side of my early home and kindred,
than in the grounds of Mount Auburn." And this was in truth
characteristic of him and of his feelings, as the reader will have
gathered ere this. A retiring spirit governed him at all times, unmoved
by one single prompting of ambition or a desire for fame, and only
zealous in the service of his Lord and Master. His works he desired to
leave behind him as perfect as might be, because he hoped that, even
after he had himself ceased to live, they might be productive of good to
his fellow-men; but it was the only memento he wished to leave behind.
"I can hardly conceive of language," he says, "to express the flood of
tender emotions that overflow my heart, when I look upon that valley and
those well-remembered hills. I seem as if touched by some potent wand,
and to be changed from age to youth again. It becomes impossible to
realize the crowd of incidents and experiences that have thronged my
pathway for more than half a century. I am once more in that frugal,
happy home, where contentment ever smiled upon us, and the kind words of
my brothers and the affection of my sisters, more than compensated for
what by some would have been considered not an enviable lot. Though that
cottage is now levelled by Time's ruthless hands, yet how prominent it
stands before my mind's eye! That aged and beloved parent now rests on
yonder hill-side. Those brothers and sisters,--how various the fortune
of each! All, _all_ have now passed that portal to which my own
footsteps are steadily wending." He was often inspired to pour out his
feelings in song, after visiting Richmond and the haunts of his youth,
for his heart was full of the memories of those days that had endeared
the spot to him. The following lines upon this subject were composed for
his children to sing with instrumental accompaniment, and are written in
the metre of one of his favorite songs, the air of "Dumbarton's Bonny
Belle."
BALLOU'S DELL.
"There are no hills in Hampshire New,
No valleys half so fair,
As those which spread before the view
In merry Richmond, where
I first my mortal race began,
And passed my youthful days,--
Where first I saw the golden sun,
And felt his warming rays.
There is no spot in Richmond where
Fond memory loves to dwell,
As on the glebe outspreading there
In Ballou's blithesome dell.
There are no birds that sing so sweet
As those upon the spray,
Where, from the brow of 'Grassy Hill,'
Comes forth the morning ray.
Unnumbered flowers, the pride of spring,
Are born to flourish there,
And round them mellow odors fling
Through all the ambient air.
There purling springs have charms for me
That vulgar brooks ne'er give,
And winds breathe sweeter down the lea
Than where magnolias live!"
This is but one of a large number of pieces composed by Mr. Ballou while
inspired by the same theme. It will serve to show the reader the
hallowed and inspiring feelings that lived in the writer's heart, as his
memory went back in freshness to the days and associations of his
boyhood, as in retrospection he shook away the snow of time from the
evergreen of memory.
The attachment to one's birth-place, to the home of early youth, "be it
ever so humble," is a beautiful trait of character, and is significant
of a refined and noble spirit. It is in masses one of the first and most
prolific fruits of civilization, distinguishing a stable community from
a nomadic tribe; and, as another peculiarity of the trait, it is most
touchingly exhibited in the least fortunate members of the human family.
The Icelanders, dwelling in a hyperborean region, where for a large
portion of the year they are deprived of the light of the sun, and
depend upon the stars and the Aurora Borealis to guide their footsteps
in the long, long winter midnight, are accustomed to say, with a spirit
of unmistakable fondness and affection, Iceland is the fairest country
of the globe! The poor Highlander regards the smoky hut where he was
born with enthusiastic love. As life draws gradually towards its close,
this feeling deepens in the human breast. Standing on the extreme verge
of existence, and just about to leave the world forever, man, as he
turns to survey the pathway he has travelled, overlooks its midway
stations, and fixes his eyes upon the starting. The beginning and the
end of the journey are then brought close together; from the earthly to
the eternal home there is but one step; from the tenderest recollections
of his earthly parent he passes into the presence of his Father in
heaven. Love of home! what a theme for the essayist!
It would almost seem as if the deprivations and hardships of his
youthful days must have thrown an unhappy spell about his early home,
and as though the memories that came up to him from the long vista of
years would be laden with recollections of want and severe trial, of
personal endurance, of scanty food and more scanty clothing; in short,
of all the stern realities of his childhood's home. But this was very
far from being the case with him. He has often said to us, in relation
to this subject, that he deemed his life at that time anything but
unhappy,--that what now appeared to be so great hardships, by
comparison, were then but trifling discomforts, and matters of course.
He was never inclined to set up for a martyr, or to gather any credit
for having endured patiently, and risen in time above the fortunes of
his youth. He could only recall this period of his life with feelings of
pleasure. Such feelings as these force upon us the conviction that there
is ever about the place of one's birth a spell that hardship seems only
the more closely to bind about the heart,--that deprivation and want but
the more strongly cement. The cheerful allusion to the affectionate
regard of his brothers and sisters, and the remark that contentment ever
smiled upon his early home, show the true spirit of the man, and the
natural trait which ever influenced him to make the best of everything.
"How I used to cherish a kind word from my father, when I was a boy!"
says Mr. Ballou. "He was in some respects an austere man; and when I was
born, being the youngest of our large family, he had got to be advanced
in years, and looked with a more serious and practical eye on the events
of life and all things about us. He was Puritanic, strictly religious,
as he interpreted the meaning of that word, and his mind was ever
engrossed upon serious matters. But when he put his hand sometimes upon
my head, and told me I had done well, that the labor I had performed
might have been more poorly done by older hands, or that I was a good
and faithful boy, my heart was electrified beyond measure; and I
remember his words and smile, even now, with delight."
How the simplicity and purity of the man shine forth in this little
paragraph!
"It may be interesting to your readers to know how Father Ballou was
regarded in the town of his nativity," says the Rev. Joshua Britton,
Jr., of Richmond, N. H., in a communication addressed to the Christian
Freeman. "He was accustomed to visit this place once in every few years,
and always received a cordial and hearty greeting. It was my privilege
and happiness to spend a few days with him on the occasion of his visit
here in October last. I removed to this town in October, 1850, and soon
learned that there was a general desire among our friends to see and
hear their fellow-townsman again. The approach of cold weather prevented
our taking any immediate steps to accomplish this object. In June, 1851,
I saw him at the meeting of the State Convention in Chicopee. He had
many affectionate inquiries to make respecting his friends in Richmond,
but then he could not name any time when he would visit us. In July I
wrote him, and he replied August 5, and said:--'I want very much to
visit Richmond, and will on one of the days you have named.' He
suggested that we could complete the arrangement at the convention
meeting in Boston. We did so, and fixed upon Sunday, October 12th, as
the day when he would be with us. He was careful to have no appointment
for the following Sunday, in order that he might remain in this
vicinity. He was met at Fitzwilliam depot, by one of our friends, on
Friday, October 10th, and conveyed to his residence. Sunday was a
favorable day for meeting, and there was a large audience from this and
the adjacent towns in this state and in Massachusetts. It was a happy
day for us all; but I must not dwell here.
"Though I enjoyed the meeting very much, yet my enjoyment was still
greater on the following week, in the society of our aged friend and
father, at my own home and the homes of our mutual friends in this town.
"It may be proper to state that Father Ballou had no very near
relatives here. None, I believe, by the name of Ballou. He was a cousin
of Father Luke Harris, and with him and his family he spent a portion of
the time quite pleasantly. He seemed happy in being once more in his
'native Richmond.'
"Three days the writer accompanied Father Ballou while he made calls
upon various families in different parts of the town. We were uniformly
kindly received; and those not acquainted with Father Ballou can hardly
conceive the ease and success with which he familiarly approached
all,--the young, the middle-aged, and the aged. We had brief interviews,
but they were agreeable and profitable. Prayer was offered with and
consolation afforded to the sick. In one or two instances we met with
those whose minds were in doubt on doctrinal points: these, of course,
listened to a few words of explanation. Then there was the going back to
former days, and a rehearsal of time's numerous changes. We visited the
old burying-ground, and stood by the graves of the parents of my aged
companion. We visited the old homestead, the place where he was born,
and spent his boyhood. This was changed, and unchanged. The buildings,
fences, and some of the fields, presented a new aspect, but the valleys
and hills remained as before. At the homestead we entered the orchard,
where the owner was engaged picking apples. We walked about and found
apples, of which my companion ate, though he declined taking any, a
short time previous, on an adjoining farm. We also, by invitation, dined
here, and had a pleasant chat with the family. This farm is a mile and
a half east of our meeting-house. Grassy Hill is on its eastern border,
and overlooks the valley in which it is situated. Some will recollect
the poetry of our friend, 'My native Richmond.' He repeated this, at my
suggestion, at a dwelling in full view of this eminence; and as the
words 'Grassy Hill' were spoken, he gracefully waved his right hand in
that direction, his countenance expressing satisfaction and delight.
"Several times, during his stay, the inquiry was agitated,--'Will you
come to Richmond again?' His reply was, ''Tis uncertain,--I may; should
life be spared, and my health remain as good as it is at present, I
think I may.' But, as we had some reason to expect, this proved to be
his last visit. He was conveyed to Winchester on Friday, where he
preached on the following Sabbath. He returned on Tuesday, Oct. 21st. I
made a few calls with him on the afternoon of that day, and in the
evening he spent an hour at our singing-school, tarrying with us at
night. On the following morning we bade him 'good-by,' and he proceeded
homewards to visit a daughter, rejoined his wife, and in due time
reached their home in Boston."
In Mr. Ballou's letter to the Trumpet, describing this visit, he says:--
"When I arrived at the depot in Fitzwilliam, I was met by a worthy
and respected friend, from Richmond, who came on purpose to convey
me to his hospitable dwelling in the neighborhood of the place of
my birth. Our road passed through the farm on which I was born,
and on which my childhood and youth were spent. All around lay the
hills and the mountains, the valleys and streams, which I always
carry with me on the map of fond memory. But where were the father,
the mother, the brothers and sisters, who watched over my infancy
and guided my youth? The hope of the gospel answers, in HEAVEN!
Before the Sabbath, I was conveyed by our worthy Brother Britton,
the beloved pastor of the Universalist society, to the dwellings of
a number of my kindred and friends, who received me with a welcome
corresponding with the esteem in which they were held by me. But
some bitter drops were mingled with the sweet cordials of
friendship and love. Some deaths had recently removed the beloved
and respected, causing those sanctifying sorrows to which love and
friendship are heirs. When the Sabbath came, I was conducted by
Bro. Britton to the house of devotion, and into the pulpit where he
is wont to break the bread of life to the flock of his charge. I
was agreeably surprised at beholding the crowded congregation,
which filled the house to its utmost capacity with people, who came
not only from all parts of Richmond, but from all the adjoining
towns. * * * * When I beheld this large assembly, all of which
seemed to be moved with one spirit, every countenance presenting
the same expression of desire and expectation, I felt oppressed
with a sense of my weakness, and lifted my desires to Him who is
able to strengthen the weak, and from what seems a scanty portion
to feed the multitude.
"I could not avoid a comparison between what I then saw with the
condition of the cause of divine truth sixty years ago, when I
first attempted to speak in its defence in a private dwelling in
this Richmond. Then, but a few could be collected to hear the
impartial and efficient grace of the Redeemer proclaimed and
defended.
"The Universalist meeting-house in Richmond is quite respectable
for size, conveniently constructed, and neat in appearance. The
society who worship here is not very numerous, yet I believe more
so than that of any other denomination in town. As far as my
acquaintance enabled me to judge, I had reason to believe that
better disposed disciples of the Divine Master are seldom found.
Bro. Britton preaches here one-half of his time. He is a sober,
candid, well-educated and faithful pastor, and highly esteemed by
his society here, and also in Winchester, where he labors
successfully the other half of his time. His family consists of an
amiable companion, who knows the importance of her station, and is
faithful in the discharge of its duties, and an adopted daughter,
who is justly held in high esteem both by those whom she regards as
her parents, and by all her acquaintances.
"The Sabbath following my appointment in Richmond, which
appointment was on the second Sabbath in October, I preached in
Winchester. The day was extremely rainy and cold, and few
comparatively attended meeting. The society here has a very good
and convenient house, and its condition at present is said to be
promising. The friends of truth here are firm and steadfast, full
of hope and confidence, promising perseverance unto the end.
"After my labors on this rainy Sabbath, I found myself much
exhausted, and was sensibly unwell. My friends were kind and
attentive to me, and the worn-out servant was well provided for. On
Wednesday a respectable merchant of Richmond brought me in his
carriage to the depot in Fitzwilliam. By aid of Divine Providence I
arrived the same day at Lancaster, where I found my wife and our
family connections in good health, and my own somewhat improved.
Thanks be to God for all his mercies!
"HOSEA BALLOU."
With other numerous calls upon his time and attention, and in addition
to his never-ceasing professional and parochial labors, Mr. Ballou has
had at various times over _twenty_ ministerial students, who, for the
time being, generally became residents of his family, and who studied
the profession with him. To these young men he devoted his powers with
the same untiring zeal that characterized his other professional labors.
His mode of instruction with these students was peculiar; he went with
them always, to use one of his favorite phrases, "to the root of the
matter," and was never content until he had imbued their minds with at
least a portion of the realizing sense he himself experienced relative
to all the main points of the faith he advocated. His words of advice to
them were few, but they were just what each one needed, and no more. He
was never fulsome with them, but complimented when it was deserved,
checked when it was necessary, and suggested when improvements might be
made, but ever inculcating those Christian qualities which shone forth
as a burning light in his own loveliness of character. Nearly all of
those students are now teachers of the gospel of Christ, men honored for
their Christian spirit, and as true disciples of the gospel. Most of
these are settled in the New England States; and, as we write, we easily
recall the names of numbers who are much respected and beloved by the
denomination to which they belong.
In the instruction and guidance of so large a number of candidates for
the sacred calling of the ministry, he assumed a very weighty addition
to his constant labors. We have seen that his parochial, ministerial,
scholastic and editorial duties, were exceedingly onerous, and many
would have shrunk from the idea of adding to such an accumulation of
labors. But it was a principle of Mr. Ballou's life never to neglect a
single opportunity of serving the great and sacred cause in which he had
embarked; he felt the full force of his mission, and to it he was
constantly ready to devote every energy of his physical and mental
nature, every moment of his time, looking to the source of all power for
the strength and inspiration necessary to sustain him in his task.
Among those who felt a vocation to preach the word of God, there was an
earnest desire to pursue its study under the guidance of one who was the
father and oracle of the creed they had espoused. They felt that,
transmitted through other mediums, many of the rays of light that beamed
from his original mind must necessarily be lost; they sought to derive
directly from him the clear instructions, the vigorous reasoning, the
straightforward mode of investigation, which distinguished him. They
wished to be near him, to follow his example in everything pertaining to
a Christian's duty. As to himself, he was never so happy as when
imparting instruction to those who really desired and sought it. His
inquiring and intelligent spirit constantly sympathized with minds of
kindred stamp, nor did he ever lose his warm sympathies for youth. With
the motto _progress_ inscribed upon his banner, he was at heart and in
soul as much with the young as the hoary-headed. The child-like
simplicity of his nature brought ardent youth very near to his vigorous
and green old age, harmonizing the two extremes in a wonderful manner.
In biographical writing there is often an obvious and studied obscurity
in regard to some certain portion of the subject's life. The reason for
such a course, on the part of the author, is very plain; for there are
few public men, who are deemed worthy the notice of a biographical
record, who do not look back with regret, and often with deep
mortification, to some heedless act of early life;--some deed wherein
the laws of right and wrong have been disregarded, and honorable and
upright principles trampled under foot; some thoughtless moment, when
the tempter has found them with their armor off, and has led them into
contact with evil that has pierced their defenceless bodies, and left
there scars deep and rankling, as monuments of the frailty of their
nature. In reference to this subject as it relates to Mr. Ballou, there
is not one hour of his life which will not bear the scrutiny of strict
justice. From his very boyhood he was remarkable for firmness of
principle, and unwavering integrity of purpose. Had he a personal enemy
in the world, that person could not point to a single act of his life
that it would not give us pleasure to chronicle here!
We know that this is saying much, and that the reader will be apt to
look back and re-read the last passage; but, while we write this strong
language, we wish to be understood as doing so in all calmness and
judgment; each word, as written, is duly set down and abided by. Now, we
humbly ask, how many are there, among those to whom the world accords
the meed of greatness, that can have this language applied to them and
their characters in truth? I do not mean to signify that there are no
such men; but to say--and the experience and personal knowledge of all
will bear testimony to the fact--that such cases are very rarely found
in this every-day world.
When we go back and consider Mr. Ballou's early life, the very limited
means he enjoyed of mental cultivation, and all the vicissitudes through
which he has passed, and contrast this view of his life with the
station which he ultimately filled, and consider the works of his pen
and mind, we are led to remember that it has ever been the fate of
genius to climb the rugged steeps of fame and honor under the greatest
disadvantages; that the brightest gems the exploring mind has brought
from the caves of knowledge have been wrought, before they were given to
the world, with the poorest means, and the least available tools. It is
the circumstance of those very disadvantages that has elicited more
mental diamonds than all the schools and richly-endowed institutions in
the world.
Though the difficulties and impediments that thus environ the path of
genius seem like a heavy stone about the neck, yet they are very often
like the stones used by the hardy pearl-divers, which enable them to
reach their prize, and to rise enriched. Adversity is to genius what the
steel is to the flint,--the fire concealed in the one is brought out
only by contact with the other. "Hard is the task," says Coleridge, "to
climb into the niches of Fame's proud temple; rough and cold is the
road; but rougher and stronger than the rocks that strew it are the men
who toil over it. Up they climb from the cottages and lowly homes of the
world; over Alps and Alps do they stride, heaving the millstone of
persecution from their towering heads, and bursting into the sunshine of
glory, despite of all that circumstances could do to keep them down."
The experience of all mankind shows that nothing great can be
accomplished without labor. The original difference between men who
have achieved greatness, and those who have died in obscurity, is,
perhaps, after all, very inconsiderable; but the same ideas which in the
latter died in their birth for want of culture, in the former, fostered,
sustained and developed, by assiduous labor, flourished, and produced
both flower and fruit. Uncultivated genius is a melancholy spectacle; it
is like the light of a shooting star, brilliant, flashing, but
evanescent, dazzling the eye for a moment, and then sinking into outer
darkness; while cultivated genius, blazing with a steady, constant and
pure flame, dispenses a surer and vivifying warmth far around it,--its
light is not that of the meteor, but the planet. All history and all
experience go to show that the bane of genius is not adversity, but
prosperity. It was not Alpine toils, but "Capuan delights," that
decimated the ranks of Hannibal's army, and wasted them away; it is not
the cold north wind, but the genial sunshine, that destroys the mighty
avalanche. The soul of genius, like the iron of the mine, must undergo
the ordeal of fire, ere it can become steel. We might quote many
examples of history to prove that this is a universal law of our nature.
It is true that some have achieved greatness when their worldly
circumstances were easy and affluent; but in such cases the gift of
genius has been accompanied by a mental organization which imposed
internal struggles, and hence the rule may be said to be without
exceptions.
Books, thoughts, deeds, imperishable memorials of their author, so
laboriously accomplished, do not die with the body. No; a thought once
expressed never dies;--it must exert its influence, and be the pioneer
to many more. Like the gentle ripple upon a calm, placid lake, it starts
upon the world a speck, but ceases not to expand its force until it
reaches over all extent. Man does not die with the body; as the soul
shall live forever, so does the influence he has exerted upon society
live after him, and by that influence is he judged. Is not this thought
in itself a strong incentive to virtue and well-doing? What man or woman
is there, however humble be their sphere of action, but desires most
earnestly to leave behind a good and honored name?
An ancient maxim avers that "spoken words fly away, but written ones are
permanent." But modern science teaches us that no sound uttered by the
lips of man is lost,--that the vibration of the air bears it onward and
onward, through all time. How very few there are in this world whose
words, written and spoken, are so considered that they are willing to
have them consigned to immortality! How few whose utterance of a year
old will bear the test of their own judgment! There are moments of
existence, generally the closing ones, when all our words and deeds
crowd back upon the memory with overwhelming force. There are records of
men in seasons of extreme casualties, who have testified to the painful
accuracy of memory under such imminent circumstances; and there are few,
indeed, who so shape their lives as to be enabled to bear with
equanimity a retrospective glance on the panorama of their existence. So
to have lived that, in ceasing to live, they have no reason to blush
for their existence, as it regards the daily duty of the
Christian.--Alas! in seasons of trial and temptation this duty is often,
very often, forgotten; the way-side of life is strewn thick with
temptations and allurements to win us from the straight and narrow path.
Fruits of golden promise tempt the hand to pluck them, and it is only
after tasting that we discover them to be only dust and ashes, like
those which grow on the fated shores of the Dead Sea. Happy, then, and
worthy of all reverence, is he whose unwavering course through life has
ever been onward and upward. The summit gained, whence both the promised
land and that of his earthly pilgrimage are in view, he can turn back
and say, as his vision embraces the line which his feet have trod so
toilsomely, yet ever so cheerfully:--"I have held that path without
variation; no temptation has seduced my footsteps to the right or to the
left, nor have my lips uttered aught upon that journey which a wish, in
this trying moment, would recall!"
There have been, at various times, and in different works, short
biographical sketches of Mr. Ballou's life given, from various
pens;--these, of course, contemplate only his public career, and are
quite brief. In the third volume of the Universalist Miscellany,
published in 1846, there appear the following remarks from the pen of
the editor, which we subjoin. After giving a short account of his public
career, the writer of the sketch referred to goes on to say:--
"We have not time, even if we had the ability, to give a just
description of him as a man, a Christian, and a preacher. We will not,
however, permit the occasion to pass without offering a word on each of
these points.
"We presume no one was ever more highly beloved and truly respected by
his acquaintances than Mr. Ballou. Pleasant in his disposition, and
honest in his dealings, he has uniformly enjoyed their confidence and
esteem. Though he always sustains a becoming dignity of character, and
is never light or trifling, he has a pleasantry and shrewdness which
render his company peculiarly agreeable.
"As a Christian, Mr. Ballou is firm in faith, and catholic in spirit.
While he believes with undoubting confidence what he preaches, and has
no respect for what he considers error in doctrine, he never manifests a
want of kindness towards those of an opposite faith. We are aware that
many entertain a different feeling; but they misjudge him. It is true
that for the insincere and hypocritical he has no feeling; and, if he
had, he would not be faithful to his ministry.
"As a preacher, Mr. Ballou, for clearness of conception and power of
argument, has few, if any, superiors. We have often heard him preach
with an unction and power that we have never heard surpassed. But we do
not design, in this article, to speak at length of his qualities as a
preacher.
"No man ever enjoyed the respect of our denomination more than does Mr.
Ballou. He is cordially loved and esteemed by all who believe in the
salvation of the world."
These remarks are valued the more highly as coming from one who was
intimate with the subject of this biography for a long period, and also
as a fair and unprejudiced tribute to his character and life by a
brother-laborer in the vineyard of Christ. The number of the Miscellany
which contains the remarks we have quoted is embellished by a mezzotint
likeness of Mr. Ballou, from a painting by E. H. Conant, and engraved in
the finest style of art by Sartain. This picture, however, is inferior,
as to likeness, to many others which are preserved of him.
We conceive the following, from the pen of the venerable and beloved
Father Streeter, the oldest minister in the Universalist denomination
now among us, to be of great interest; the work in hand would be quite
incomplete without it. It is the impression of a faithful brother
concerning the deceased, from the commencement to the close of his
professional career.
"I first saw Father Ballou a short time before the commencement of
his public ministry. It was in the town of Vernon, then called
Hinsdale, in the State of Vermont. At that time there was but one
open and decided Universalist in the place. This solitary champion
of the common salvation had long been impressed with a desire to
have the gospel of the grace of God, in the fulness of its
universality, preached to those of his neighbors who might feel
disposed to give it a hearing. An arrangement was at length made
with the Rev. David Ballou, an elder brother, to deliver a lecture
in the place.
"The day was designated, and due notice of the meeting given. At
the appointed time the preacher came, and Hosea came with him. He
was then a tall, slim young man, with an aspect, however, which
indicated profound thought, and a deep solemnity of feeling. In his
general appearance there was a marked peculiarity, a certain
something which arrested and fixed the attention, and which
impressed the beholder with the conviction that no ordinary
individual was before him,--that the germs of eminence, the genuine
elements of intellectual greatness, were embodied within him.
"Such, at any rate, was the impression among the more inquisitive
and discriminating who attended that meeting. At the close of the
sermon, Hosea gave an exhortation, and offered the concluding
prayer; and this effort was spoken of, especially by the less
conservative and bigoted, as one of rare spirituality and power. It
became the topic of general remark, and of high encomium.
"The next day, if I mistake not, he made his first attempt as a
preacher of the everlasting gospel, as a public advocate of the
sublime doctrine of the salvation of all men 'by the blood of the
cross.' It was, as I have often heard him say, a partial failure.
The exordium went off very well; but, as he proceeded with the
discussion, he often hesitated, now and then came to a pause, and
was finally obliged to sit down before he had reached the original
design of the discourse.
"He was deeply mortified. He was discouraged. He resolved to
abandon all thoughts of the ministry. He felt himself utterly
incompetent to the efficient discharge of its high and momentous
duties. His friends, however, interfered in the premises. They
succeeded in changing his purpose. They persuaded him to persevere
in the work of a Christian minister, and it was not long before he
made his second attempt at sermonizing. The effort succeeded. It
was a complete triumph. The manner in which he acquitted himself
was a matter of deep astonishment to his friends, and to all who
heard him. In that meeting his lofty and invaluable career finds
its legitimate date. It was followed by no faltering, no
irresolution, no shrinking from toil, however laborious, or however
wearing to the physical frame or to the mental powers.
"He soon became immensely popular. His fame went forth as on the
wings of every wind. From all quarters, far and near, the
Macedonian cry, 'Come over and help us,' poured in upon him. These
calls, so far as it was possibly practicable, were promptly and
cheerfully honored. His labors, of course, became exceedingly
abundant,--almost, indeed, without intermission. By day and by
night he was found at his post, and zealously doing his great work.
"He frequently held meetings in the town where he was born and
brought up, and in nearly all the towns in that region. His
circuits often embraced some hundreds of miles, and in making them
he preached almost every day, and not unfrequently several times in
a day; and wherever it was generally known that he was to hold
forth, immense crowds rarely failed to be present, that they might
listen to his testimony. Though a mere youngster, I myself once
walked, or rather ran, eight miles and back, to hear him. The news
of the meeting did not reach me till somewhat late on Sabbath
morning, and no mode of conveyance to the place could be obtained.
I was, of course, reduced to the necessity of either losing that
rare spiritual treat, or of making my way to it on what Mr. Murray
used to call 'apostolical horses;' in other words, on foot. And so
great was my anxiety not to lose a word that might fall from his
lips, that I forgot to take with me a crumb of anything for a
lunch, and so I lost my dinner; or, rather, I had to make it on the
sermon and the prayers which I had heard, and it was truly one of
the most luscious meals which it has ever been my good fortune to
eat. It was devoured with a high relish.
"The subject of these remarks was the youngest of five brothers,
three of whom were preachers; and I once had the privilege of
attending a meeting at which four of them, with the venerable
father, were present. Hosea was the preacher. He seemed to have
made special preparation to meet the peculiarities of the occasion.
Contrary to his usual custom, the sermon was written. At the proper
time he commenced its delivery. The old father--himself a Baptist
clergyman of considerable note--and the elder brothers, were seated
around him.
"He was not familiar with the use of a manuscript, and, of course,
to read from one he found to be a new and somewhat awkward
business. For a little time, however, he persevered in the effort.
The experiment was far from being satisfactory either to himself or
to the congregation. In spite of him, the eye would quit its hold
upon the contents of the paper, and wander about among the dense
masses who filled the seats below. These excursions caused him to
lose his place. He often found it again with no little difficulty,
and sometimes not without a most vexatious delay.
"At length his patience gave out. Its power of endurance was
completely exhausted, and, taking up the manuscript and rolling it
between his hands, he deliberately put it in his pocket.
'Brethren,' said he, 'I shall weary your patience with these
notes.' This was the end of all hesitancy. He proceeded in the
discussion of his subject with his accustomed fluency, and
everything flowed onward with the smoothness of oil. It was a
season of deep and thrilling interest.
"The venerable father, though not a Universalist, and with no
disposition to become one, listened to the arguments and
illustrations of this youngest of his sons with the profoundest
attention. I carefully watched the muscles of his face, and plainly
saw that mighty emotions were stirring within him. Every now and
then a large tear would start out from the eye, and course down
the furrows in his time-worn and manly cheek. It is not strange
that such should have been the case, for the discourse was one of
peculiar tenderness, and of uncommon pathos and power. Probably it
was rarely, if ever surpassed, even by the speaker himself, in the
palmiest days of his ministry.
"Indeed, Father Ballou's pulpit powers were of an exceedingly high
order. Taken as a whole, my impression is that I have never known
his equal. Never have I seen a man who could hold his hearers so
perfectly under his own control. They were entirely at his command.
He clothed them in smiles, or melted them to tears, and these
things he seemed to do at pleasure. This power embodies the chief
component in true eloquence. We often refer, and with profound
admiration, to the pulpit talents of Griffin and Beecher, of
Channing, and Dewey, and Chapin. And to these men the meed of rare
eloquence unquestionably belongs; but still, taken all in all, they
fall far below the standard of Father Ballou. Theirs is an
eloquence of another and a humbler type. They deal chiefly with the
intellect,--with the demands of a literary and refined taste; he
dealt more especially with the latent chords of the heart,--moved
and controlled the deeper sympathies and more refined affections of
the human soul. Relying but little upon books, he went principally
upon the profundity and strength of his own resources. The
structure of his mind approached very near to an actual intuition.
He grasped the whole of a subject at a glance. His powers of
analysis were prodigious, and singularly accurate. He stopped not
to inquire what others had thought or done. He examined every
subject for himself. Like the diver for pearls, he plunged to the
depths of divine truth; and, when he had found a precious gem, he
rose with it to the surface, held it up before the eyes of the
people, and said to them, This belongs to you, and there are more
of the same sort where I found it,--enough for you all, and for the
millions of the race to which you belong.
"But it was not in the office of a Christian minister, merely, that
Father Ballou excelled. He was admirable in every sphere of life.
As a husband and a father, the head of a numerous family, he was
truly a model man. He knew how to rule his own household. His word
was law, and obedience to it was prompt and cheerful by all around
him. There were no family jars in that well-ordered and happy home.
The idea, perhaps, is an extravagant one, but I have often thought
that his house was the nearest fac-simile of the great mansion of
the Infinite Father on High of which I could form a conception.
"And then as a brother and a friend he had no superior. With the
exception, perhaps, of some members of his own family, there is no
one living who enjoyed so long and so intimate an acquaintance with
him as myself; and it is one of the happiest reflections of my
life, that, in all our intercourse, not a single unkind word or
emotion ever passed between us.
"Indeed, I never knew his kindly regards mastered but once, and
that was after the endurance of many gross and most cruel
provocations. But on one occasion his philosophy and his religion
failed him, and then his brow was mantled with the very majesty of
wrath, the frowning aspect of a deep and withering indignation. The
roll of a moment or two, however, and it was all over. The old
saint was himself again, and never, from that time to the day of
his death, did I ever hear him utter an unfriendly word in relation
to the individual by whom he had been so grossly and wickedly
abused. But I must not enlarge. I have no wish to deal in flattery;
but, injustice to my own feelings, and to the memory of our
departed father, I must say that he was one of the very best men
with whom it has been my happiness to associate. Indeed, I doubt
whether he had a solitary failing,--so far, I mean, as the
convictions and purposes of his own mind were concerned.
"S. S."