3. Asking for opinions when the collection is complete.

In view of the facts outlined above, it seems reasonable to suppose

that one of the committee's most valuable functions is to act in an

advisory capacity, not only to librarians, but to publishers and

binders. For this reason all librarians are urged to submit their

binding problems to the committee.

=Magazine Binders=

During the year a number of varieties of magazine binders have been

examined. Several firms failed to respond to a request for a sample

or did so too late. Others doubtless exist of which the committee has

not heard. The result of study of this subject during the past three

years, aided by the chapter dealing with it in Dana's "Book binding for

libraries," Edition 2, is here set forth.

Of course no one binder is best for all libraries or for all

requirements of one library. Each must decide for itself by noting the

condition of its magazines when they are ready for the bindery whether

any binder at all is needed. A library which has no money to spend on

the more durable covers or dislikes them for any reason may use one

of the methods described in the chapter in Dana referred to above. A

method, used to some extent by the Brooklyn public library, consists,

in brief, of putting on a brown paper cover and securing it by paste or

brass staples to a bunch of advertising pages at front and back.

The best inexpensive binder is that known as the "Springfield." It

can be made in any bindery, consisting simply of a cover with a stiff

strip at the back in which are three eyelet holes, one at each end and

one in the middle. The magazine is laced in with tape or shoe string.

This method damages the magazine much less than others similar, some of

which require drilling holes through from side to side. In principle

the binder made by Cedric Chivers, Brooklyn, N. Y., is a more durable

form of the Springfield and is heartily recommended.

Some libraries desire a binder from which a magazine cannot readily be

stolen. This is a matter of local opinion. The best for this purpose

appear to be the new "Bull dog" binder just put on the market by

Gaylord Brothers, Syracuse, N. Y., and the "Buchan" binder mentioned by

Mr. Dana. All such binders are heavy, clumsy, and slow in operation.

For those magazines deceitfully put together without sewing or staples

the "Bull dog" and the "Buchan" binder will both give satisfaction.

Among a multitude of other binders the best type is that whose

mechanism consists of a stout rod firmly fastened though playing free

at one end, and fastened at the other by a simple catch. Many built on

this principle are too clumsy. A few are needlessly flimsy. Of those

examined the best are the following:--

"Universal" made by J. J. Ralek, New York City.

"A. L. B." made by American Library Bindery, Philadelphia.

"Torsion" made by Barrett Bindery Co., Chicago.

For covering binders various materials have been used. For long service

and good appearance we recommend pig skin back and keratol sides. Cow

hide and buckram are cheaper and will not last as long. Canvas is ill

suited for this purpose.

Respectfully submitted,

A. L. BAILEY, Chairman.

ROSE G. MURRAY,

N. L. GOODRICH,

Committee.

Papers and Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth Annual Meeting of the American Library Association Held at Ottawa, Canada, June 26-July 2, 1912 · 第 93 / 250 题