&c., of the Roman cardinals, are very ably discussed by
Thomassin, (Discipline de l’Eglise, tom. i. p. 1262—1287;) but
their purple is now much faded. The sacred college was raised to
the definite number of seventy-two, to represent, under his
vicar, the disciples of Christ.]
70 (return) [ See the bull of Gregory X. approbante sacro
concilio, in the _Sexts_ of the Canon Law, (l. i. tit. 6, c. 3,)
a supplement to the Decretals, which Boniface VIII. promulgated
at Rome in 1298, and addressed in all the universities of
Europe.]
71 (return) [ The genius of Cardinal de Retz had a right to paint
a conclave, (of 1665,) in which he was a spectator and an actor,
(Mémoires, tom. iv. p. 15—57;) but I am at a loss to appreciate
the knowledge or authority of an anonymous Italian, whose history
(Conclavi de’ Pontifici Romani, in 4to. 1667) has been continued
since the reign of Alexander VII. The accidental form of the work
furnishes a lesson, though not an antidote, to ambition. From a
labyrinth of intrigues, we emerge to the adoration of the
successful candidate; but the next page opens with his funeral.]
72 (return) [ The expressions of Cardinal de Retz are positive
and picturesque: On y vecut toujours ensemble avec le même
respect, et la même civilité que l’on observe dans le cabinet des
rois, avec la même politesse qu’on avoit dans la cour de Henri
III., avec la même familiarité que l’on voit dans les colleges;
avec la même modestie, qui se remarque dans les noviciats; et
avec la même charité, du moins en apparence, qui pourroit ètre
entre des frères parfaitement unis.]
73 (return) [ Richiesti per bando (says John Villani) sanatori di
Roma, e 52 del popolo, et capitani de’ 25, e consoli,
(_consoli?_) et 13 buone huomini, uno per rione. Our knowledge is
too imperfect to pronounce how much of this constitution was
temporary, and how much ordinary and permanent. Yet it is faintly
illustrated by the ancient statutes of Rome.]
74 (return) [ Villani (l. x. c. 68—71, in Muratori, Script. tom.
xiii. p. 641—645) relates this law, and the whole transaction,
with much less abhorrence than the prudent Muratori. Any one
conversant with the darker ages must have observed how much the
sense (I mean the nonsense) of superstition is fluctuating and
inconsistent.]
75 (return) [ In the first volume of the Popes of Avignon, see
the second original Life of John XXII. p. 142—145, the confession
of the antipope p. 145—152, and the laborious notes of Baluze, p.
714, 715.]
Had the election been always held in the Vatican, the rights of
the senate and people would not have been violated with impunity.
But the Romans forgot, and were forgotten. in the absence of the
successors of Gregory the Seventh, who did not keep as a divine
precept their ordinary residence in the city and diocese. The
care of that diocese was less important than the government of
the universal church; nor could the popes delight in a city in
which their authority was always opposed, and their person was
often endangered. From the persecution of the emperors, and the
wars of Italy, they escaped beyond the Alps into the hospitable
bosom of France; from the tumults of Rome they prudently withdrew
to live and die in the more tranquil stations of Anagni, Perugia,
Viterbo, and the adjacent cities. When the flock was offended or
impoverished by the absence of the shepherd, they were recalled
by a stern admonition, that St. Peter had fixed his chair, not in
an obscure village, but in the capital of the world; by a
ferocious menace, that the Romans would march in arms to destroy
the place and people that should dare to afford them a retreat.
They returned with timorous obedience; and were saluted with the
account of a heavy debt, of all the losses which their desertion
had occasioned, the hire of lodgings, the sale of provisions, and
the various expenses of servants and strangers who attended the
court. 76 After a short interval of peace, and perhaps of
authority, they were again banished by new tumults, and again
summoned by the imperious or respectful invitation of the senate.
In these occasional retreats, the exiles and fugitives of the
Vatican were seldom long, or far, distant from the metropolis;
but in the beginning of the fourteenth century, the apostolic
throne was transported, as it might seem forever, from the Tyber
to the Rhône; and the cause of the transmigration may be deduced
from the furious contest between Boniface the Eighth and the king
of France. 77 The spiritual arms of excommunication and interdict
were repulsed by the union of the three estates, and the
privileges of the Gallican church; but the pope was not prepared
against the carnal weapons which Philip the Fair had courage to
employ. As the pope resided at Anagni, without the suspicion of
danger, his palace and person were assaulted by three hundred
horse, who had been secretly levied by William of Nogaret, a
French minister, and Sciarra Colonna, of a noble but hostile
family of Rome. The cardinals fled; the inhabitants of Anagni
were seduced from their allegiance and gratitude; but the
dauntless Boniface, unarmed and alone, seated himself in his
chair, and awaited, like the conscript fathers of old, the swords
of the Gauls. Nogaret, a foreign adversary, was content to
execute the orders of his master: by the domestic enmity of
Colonna, he was insulted with words and blows; and during a
confinement of three days his life was threatened by the
hardships which they inflicted on the obstinacy which they
provoked. Their strange delay gave time and courage to the
adherents of the church, who rescued him from sacrilegious
violence; but his imperious soul was wounded in the vital part;
and Boniface expired at Rome in a frenzy of rage and revenge. His
memory is stained with the glaring vices of avarice and pride;
nor has the courage of a martyr promoted this ecclesiastical
champion to the honors of a saint; a magnanimous sinner, (say the
chronicles of the times,) who entered like a fox, reigned like a
lion, and died like a dog. He was succeeded by Benedict the
Eleventh, the mildest of mankind. Yet he excommunicated the
impious emissaries of Philip, and devoted the city and people of
Anagni by a tremendous curse, whose effects are still visible to
the eyes of superstition. 78
76 (return) [ Romani autem non valentes nec volentes ultra suam
celare cupiditatem gravissimam, contra papam movere cperunt
questionem, exigentes ab eo urgentissime omnia quæ subierant per
ejus absentiam damna et jacturas, videlicet in hispitiis
locandis, in mercimoniis, in usuris, in redditibus, in
provisionibus, et in aliis modis innumerabilibus. Quòd cum
audisset papa, præcordialiter ingemuit, et se comperiens
_muscipulatum_, &c., Matt. Paris, p. 757. For the ordinary
history of the popes, their life and death, their residence and
absence, it is enough to refer to the ecclesiastical annalists,
Spondanus and Fleury.]
77 (return) [ Besides the general historians of the church of
Italy and of France, we possess a valuable treatise composed by a
learned friend of Thuanus, which his last and best editors have
published in the appendix (Histoire particulière du grand
Différend entre Boniface VIII et Philippe le Bel, par Pierre du
Puis, tom. vii. P. xi. p. 61—82.)]
78 (return) [ It is difficult to know whether Labat (tom. iv. p.
53—57) be in jest or in earnest, when he supposes that Anagni
still feels the weight of this curse, and that the cornfields, or
vineyards, or olive-trees, are annually blasted by Nature, the
obsequious handmaid of the popes.]
Chapter LXIX: State Of Rome From The Twelfth Century.—Part IV.
After his decease, the tedious and equal suspense of the conclave
was fixed by the dexterity of the French faction. A specious
offer was made and accepted, that, in the term of forty days,
they would elect one of the three candidates who should be named
by their opponents. The archbishop of Bourdeaux, a furious enemy
of his king and country, was the first on the list; but his
ambition was known; and his conscience obeyed the calls of
fortune and the commands of a benefactor, who had been informed
by a swift messenger that the choice of a pope was now in his
hands. The terms were regulated in a private interview; and with
such speed and secrecy was the business transacted, that the
unanimous conclave applauded the elevation of Clement the Fifth.
79 The cardinals of both parties were soon astonished by a
summons to attend him beyond the Alps; from whence, as they soon
discovered, they must never hope to return. He was engaged, by
promise and affection, to prefer the residence of France; and,
after dragging his court through Poitou and Gascony, and
devouring, by his expense, the cities and convents on the road,
he finally reposed at Avignon, 80 which flourished above seventy
years 81 the seat of the Roman pontiff and the metropolis of
Christendom. By land, by sea, by the Rhône, the position of
Avignon was on all sides accessible; the southern provinces of
France do not yield to Italy itself; new palaces arose for the
accommodation of the pope and cardinals; and the arts of luxury
were soon attracted by the treasures of the church. They were
already possessed of the adjacent territory, the Venaissin
county, 82 a populous and fertile spot; and the sovereignty of
Avignon was afterwards purchased from the youth and distress of
Jane, the first queen of Naples and countess of Provence, for the
inadequate price of fourscore thousand florins. 83 Under the
shadow of a French monarchy, amidst an obedient people, the popes
enjoyed an honorable and tranquil state, to which they long had
been strangers: but Italy deplored their absence; and Rome, in
solitude and poverty, might repent of the ungovernable freedom
which had driven from the Vatican the successor of St. Peter. Her
repentance was tardy and fruitless: after the death of the old
members, the sacred college was filled with French cardinals, 84
who beheld Rome and Italy with abhorrence and contempt, and
perpetuated a series of national, and even provincial, popes,
attached by the most indissoluble ties to their native country.
79 (return) [ See, in the Chronicle of Giovanni Villani, (l.
viii. c. 63, 64, 80, in Muratori, tom. xiii.,) the imprisonment
of Boniface VIII., and the election of Clement V., the last of
which, like most anecdotes, is embarrassed with some
difficulties.]
80 (return) [ The original lives of the eight popes of Avignon,
Clement V., John XXII., Benedict XI., Clement VI., Innocent VI.,
Urban V., Gregory XI., and Clement VII., are published by Stephen
Baluze, (Vitæ Paparum Avenionensium; Paris, 1693, 2 vols. in
4to.,) with copious and elaborate notes, and a second volume of
acts and documents. With the true zeal of an editor and a
patriot, he devoutly justifies or excuses the characters of his
countrymen.]
81 (return) [ The exile of Avignon is compared by the Italians
with Babylon, and the Babylonish captivity. Such furious
metaphors, more suitable to the ardor of Petrarch than to the
judgment of Muratori, are gravely refuted in Baluze’s preface.
The abbé de Sade is distracted between the love of Petrarch and
of his country. Yet he modestly pleads, that many of the local
inconveniences of Avignon are now removed; and many of the vices
against which the poet declaims, had been imported with the Roman
court by the strangers of Italy, (tom. i. p. 23—28.)]
82 (return) [ The comtat Venaissin was ceded to the popes in 1273
by Philip III. king of France, after he had inherited the
dominions of the count of Thoulouse. Forty years before, the
heresy of Count Raymond had given them a pretence of seizure, and
they derived some obscure claim from the xith century to some
lands citra Rhodanum, (Valesii Notitia Galliarum, p. 495, 610.
Longuerue, Description de la France, tom. i. p. 376—381.)]
83 (return) [ If a possession of four centuries were not itself a
title, such objections might annul the bargain; but the purchase
money must be refunded, for indeed it was paid. Civitatem
Avenionem emit.... per ejusmodi venditionem pecuniâ redundates,
&c., (iida Vita Clement. VI. in Baluz. tom. i. p. 272. Muratori,
Script. tom. iii. P. ii. p. 565.) The only temptation for Jane
and her second husband was ready money, and without it they could
not have returned to the throne of Naples.]
84 (return) [ Clement V immediately promoted ten cardinals, nine
French and one English, (Vita ivta, p. 63, et Baluz. p. 625, &c.)
In 1331, the pope refused two candidates recommended by the king
of France, quod xx. Cardinales, de quibus xvii. de regno Franciæ
originem traxisse noscuntur in memorato collegio existant,
(Thomassin, Discipline de l’Eglise, tom. i. p. 1281.)]
The progress of industry had produced and enriched the Italian
republics: the æra of their liberty is the most flourishing
period of population and agriculture, of manufactures and
commerce; and their mechanic labors were gradually refined into
the arts of elegance and genius. But the position of Rome was
less favorable, the territory less fruitful: the character of the
inhabitants was debased by indolence and elated by pride; and
they fondly conceived that the tribute of subjects must forever
nourish the metropolis of the church and empire. This prejudice
was encouraged in some degree by the resort of pilgrims to the
shrines of the apostles; and the last legacy of the popes, the
institution of the holy year, 85 was not less beneficial to the
people than to the clergy. Since the loss of Palestine, the gift
of plenary indulgences, which had been applied to the crusades,
remained without an object; and the most valuable treasure of the
church was sequestered above eight years from public circulation.
A new channel was opened by the diligence of Boniface the Eighth,
who reconciled the vices of ambition and avarice; and the pope
had sufficient learning to recollect and revive the secular games
which were celebrated in Rome at the conclusion of every century.
To sound without danger the depth of popular credulity, a sermon
was seasonably pronounced, a report was artfully scattered, some
aged witnesses were produced; and on the first of January of the
year thirteen hundred, the church of St. Peter was crowded with
the faithful, who demanded the customary indulgence of the holy
time. The pontiff, who watched and irritated their devout
impatience, was soon persuaded by ancient testimony of the
justice of their claim; and he proclaimed a plenary absolution to
all Catholics who, in the course of that year, and at every
similar period, should respectfully visit the apostolic churches
of St. Peter and St. Paul. The welcome sound was propagated
through Christendom; and at first from the nearest provinces of
Italy, and at length from the remote kingdoms of Hungary and
Britain, the highways were thronged with a swarm of pilgrims who
sought to expiate their sins in a journey, however costly or
laborious, which was exempt from the perils of military service.
All exceptions of rank or sex, of age or infirmity, were
forgotten in the common transport; and in the streets and
churches many persons were trampled to death by the eagerness of
devotion. The calculation of their numbers could not be easy nor
accurate; and they have probably been magnified by a dexterous
clergy, well apprised of the contagion of example: yet we are
assured by a judicious historian, who assisted at the ceremony,
that Rome was never replenished with less than two hundred
thousand strangers; and another spectator has fixed at two
millions the total concourse of the year. A trifling oblation
from each individual would accumulate a royal treasure; and two
priests stood night and day, with rakes in their hands, to
collect, without counting, the heaps of gold and silver that were
poured on the altar of St. Paul. 86 It was fortunately a season
of peace and plenty; and if forage was scarce, if inns and
lodgings were extravagantly dear, an inexhaustible supply of
bread and wine, of meat and fish, was provided by the policy of
Boniface and the venal hospitality of the Romans. From a city
without trade or industry, all casual riches will speedily
evaporate: but the avarice and envy of the next generation
solicited Clement the Sixth 87 to anticipate the distant period
of the century. The gracious pontiff complied with their wishes;
afforded Rome this poor consolation for his loss; and justified
the change by the name and practice of the Mosaic Jubilee. 88 His
summons was obeyed; and the number, zeal, and liberality of the
pilgrims did not yield to the primitive festival. But they
encountered the triple scourge of war, pestilence, and famine:
many wives and virgins were violated in the castles of Italy; and
many strangers were pillaged or murdered by the savage Romans, no
longer moderated by the presence of their bishops. 89 To the
impatience of the popes we may ascribe the successive reduction
to fifty, thirty-three, and twenty-five years; although the
second of these terms is commensurate with the life of Christ.
The profusion of indulgences, the revolt of the Protestants, and
the decline of superstition, have much diminished the value of
the jubilee; yet even the nineteenth and last festival was a year
of pleasure and profit to the Romans; and a philosophic smile
will not disturb the triumph of the priest or the happiness of
the people. 90
85 (return) [ Our primitive account is from Cardinal James
Caietan, (Maxima Bibliot. Patrum, tom. xxv.;) and I am at a loss
to determine whether the nephew of Boniface VIII. be a fool or a
knave: the uncle is a much clearer character.]
86 (return) [ See John Villani (l. viii. c. 36) in the xiith, and
the Chronicon Astense, in the xith volume (p. 191, 192) of
Muratori’s Collection Papa innumerabilem pecuniam ab eisdem
accepit, nam duo clerici, cum rastris, &c.]
87 (return) [ The two bulls of Boniface VIII. and Clement VI. are
inserted on the Corpus Juris Canonici, Extravagant. (Commun. l.
v. tit. ix c 1, 2.)]
88 (return) [ The sabbatic years and jubilees of the Mosaic law,
(Car. Sigon. de Republica Hebræorum, Opp. tom. iv. l. iii. c. 14,
14, p. 151, 152,) the suspension of all care and labor, the
periodical release of lands, debts, servitude, &c., may seem a
noble idea, but the execution would be impracticable in a
_profane_ republic; and I should be glad to learn that this
ruinous festival was observed by the Jewish people.]
89 (return) [ See the Chronicle of Matteo Villani, (l. i. c. 56,)
in the xivth vol. of Muratori, and the Mémoires sur la Vie de
Pétrarque, tom. iii. p. 75—89.]
90 (return) [ The subject is exhausted by M. Chais, a French
minister at the Hague, in his Lettres Historiques et Dogmatiques,
sur les Jubilés et es Indulgences; la Haye, 1751, 3 vols. in
12mo.; an elaborate and pleasing work, had not the author
preferred the character of a polemic to that of a philosopher.]
In the beginning of the eleventh century, Italy was exposed to
the feudal tyranny, alike oppressive to the sovereign and the
people. The rights of human nature were vindicated by her
numerous republics, who soon extended their liberty and dominion
from the city to the adjacent country. The sword of the nobles
was broken; their slaves were enfranchised; their castles were
demolished; they assumed the habits of society and obedience;
their ambition was confined to municipal honors, and in the
proudest aristocracy of Venice on Genoa, each patrician was
subject to the laws. 91 But the feeble and disorderly government
of Rome was unequal to the task of curbing her rebellious sons,
who scorned the authority of the magistrate within and without
the walls. It was no longer a civil contention between the nobles
and plebeians for the government of the state: the barons
asserted in arms their personal independence; their palaces and
castles were fortified against a siege; and their private
quarrels were maintained by the numbers of their vassals and
retainers. In origin and affection, they were aliens to their
country: 92 and a genuine Roman, could such have been produced,
might have renounced these haughty strangers, who disdained the
appellation of citizens, and proudly styled themselves the
princes, of Rome. 93 After a dark series of revolutions, all
records of pedigree were lost; the distinction of surnames was
abolished; the blood of the nations was mingled in a thousand
channels; and the Goths and Lombards, the Greeks and Franks, the
Germans and Normans, had obtained the fairest possessions by
royal bounty, or the prerogative of valor. These examples might
be readily presumed; but the elevation of a Hebrew race to the
rank of senators and consuls is an event without a parallel in
the long captivity of these miserable exiles. 94 In the time of
Leo the Ninth, a wealthy and learned Jew was converted to
Christianity, and honored at his baptism with the name of his
godfather, the reigning Pope. The zeal and courage of Peter the
son of Leo were signalized in the cause of Gregory the Seventh,
who intrusted his faithful adherent with the government of
Adrian’s mole, the tower of Crescentius, or, as it is now called,
the castle of St. Angelo. Both the father and the son were the
parents of a numerous progeny: their riches, the fruits of usury,
were shared with the noblest families of the city; and so
extensive was their alliance, that the grandson of the proselyte
was exalted by the weight of his kindred to the throne of St.
Peter. A majority of the clergy and people supported his cause:
he reigned several years in the Vatican; and it is only the
eloquence of St. Bernard, and the final triumph of Innocence the
Second, that has branded Anacletus with the epithet of antipope.
After his defeat and death, the posterity of Leo is no longer
conspicuous; and none will be found of the modern nobles
ambitious of descending from a Jewish stock. It is not my design
to enumerate the Roman families which have failed at different
periods, or those which are continued in different degrees of
splendor to the present time. 95 The old consular line of the
_Frangipani_ discover their name in the generous act of
_breaking_ or dividing bread in a time of famine; and such
benevolence is more truly glorious than to have enclosed, with
their allies the _Corsi_, a spacious quarter of the city in the
chains of their fortifications; the _Savelli_, as it should seem
a Sabine race, have maintained their original dignity; the
obsolete surname of the _Capizucchi_ is inscribed on the coins of
the first senators; the _Conti_ preserve the honor, without the
estate, of the counts of Signia; and the _Annibaldi_ must have
been very ignorant, or very modest, if they had not descended
from the Carthaginian hero. 96
91 (return) [ Muratori (Dissert. xlvii.) alleges the Annals of
Florence, Padua, Genoa, &c., the analogy of the rest, the
evidence of Otho of Frisingen, (de Gest. Fred. I. l. ii. c. 13,)
and the submission of the marquis of Este.]
92 (return) [ As early as the year 824, the emperor Lothaire I.
found it expedient to interrogate the Roman people, to learn from
each individual by what national law he chose to be governed.
(Muratori, Dissertat xxii.)]
93 (return) [ Petrarch attacks these foreigners, the tyrants of
Rome, in a declamation or epistle, full of bold truths and absurd
pedantry, in which he applies the maxims, and even prejudices, of
the old republic to the state of the xivth century, (Mémoires,
tom. iii. p. 157—169.)]
94 (return) [ The origin and adventures of the Jewish family are
noticed by Pagi, (Critica, tom. iv. p. 435, A.D. 1124, No. 3, 4,)
who draws his information from the Chronographus Maurigniacensis,
and Arnulphus Sagiensis de Schismate, (in Muratori, Script. Ital.
tom. iii. P. i. p. 423—432.) The fact must in some degree be
true; yet I could wish that it had been coolly related, before it
was turned into a reproach against the antipope.]
95 (return) [ Muratori has given two dissertations (xli. and
xlii.) to the names, surnames, and families of Italy. Some
nobles, who glory in their domestic fables, may be offended with
his firm and temperate criticism; yet surely some ounces of pure
gold are of more value than many pounds of base metal.]
96 (return) [ The cardinal of St. George, in his poetical, or
rather metrical history of the election and coronation of
Boniface VIII., (Muratori Script. Ital. tom. iii. P. i. p. 641,
&c.,) describes the state and families of Rome at the coronation
of Boniface VIII., (A.D. 1295.)
Interea titulis redimiti sanguine et armis Illustresque
viri Romanâ a stirpe trahentes Nomen in emeritos tantæ
virtutis honores Insulerant sese medios festumque
colebant Aurata fulgente togâ, sociante catervâ. Ex
ipsis devota domus præstantis ab _Ursâ_ Ecclesiæ,
vultumque gerens demissius altum Festa _Columna_ jocis,
necnon _Sabellia_ mitis; Stephanides senior, _Comites_,
_Annibalica_ proles, Præfectusque urbis magnum sine
viribus nomen. (l. ii. c. 5, 100, p. 647, 648.)
The ancient statutes of Rome (l. iii. c. 59, p. 174, 175)
distinguish eleven families of barons, who are obliged to swear
in concilio communi, before the senator, that they would not
harbor or protect any malefactors, outlaws, &c.—a feeble
security!]
But among, perhaps above, the peers and princes of the city, I
distinguish the rival houses of Colonna and Ursini, whose private
story is an essential part of the annals of modern Rome. I. The
name and arms of Colonna 97 have been the theme of much doubtful
etymology; nor have the orators and antiquarians overlooked
either Trajan’s pillar, or the columns of Hercules, or the pillar
of Christ’s flagellation, or the luminous column that guided the
Israelites in the desert. Their first historical appearance in
the year eleven hundred and four attests the power and antiquity,
while it explains the simple meaning, of the name. By the
usurpation of Cavæ, the Colonna provoked the arms of Paschal the
Second; but they lawfully held in the Campagna of Rome the
hereditary fiefs of Zagarola and _Colonna_; and the latter of
these towns was probably adorned with some lofty pillar, the
relic of a villa or temple. 98 They likewise possessed one moiety
of the neighboring city of Tusculum, a strong presumption of
their descent from the counts of Tusculum, who in the tenth
century were the tyrants of the apostolic see. According to their
own and the public opinion, the primitive and remote source was
derived from the banks of the Rhine; 99 and the sovereigns of
Germany were not ashamed of a real or fabulous affinity with a
noble race, which in the revolutions of seven hundred years has
been often illustrated by merit and always by fortune. 100 About
the end of the thirteenth century, the most powerful branch was
composed of an uncle and six bothers, all conspicuous in arms, or
in the honors of the church. Of these, Peter was elected senator
of Rome, introduced to the Capitol in a triumphal car, and hailed
in some vain acclamations with the title of Cæsar; while John and
Stephen were declared marquis of Ancona and count of Romagna, by
Nicholas the Fourth, a patron so partial to their family, that he
has been delineated in satirical portraits, imprisoned as it were
in a hollow pillar. 101 After his decease their haughty behavior
provoked the displeasure of the most implacable of mankind. The
two cardinals, the uncle and the nephew, denied the election of
Boniface the Eighth; and the Colonna were oppressed for a moment
by his temporal and spiritual arms. 102 He proclaimed a crusade
against his personal enemies; their estates were confiscated;
their fortresses on either side of the Tyber were besieged by the
troops of St. Peter and those of the rival nobles; and after the
ruin of Palestrina or Præneste, their principal seat, the ground
was marked with a ploughshare, the emblem of perpetual
desolation. Degraded, banished, proscribed, the six brothers, in
disguise and danger, wandered over Europe without renouncing the
hope of deliverance and revenge. In this double hope, the French
court was their surest asylum; they prompted and directed the
enterprise of Philip; and I should praise their magnanimity, had
they respected the misfortune and courage of the captive tyrant.
His civil acts were annulled by the Roman people, who restored
the honors and possessions of the Colonna; and some estimate may
be formed of their wealth by their losses, of their losses by the
damages of one hundred thousand gold florins which were granted
them against the accomplices and heirs of the deceased pope. All
the spiritual censures and disqualifications were abolished 103
by his prudent successors; and the fortune of the house was more
firmly established by this transient hurricane. The boldness of
Sciarra Colonna was signalized in the captivity of Boniface, and
long afterwards in the coronation of Lewis of Bavaria; and by the
gratitude of the emperor, the pillar in their arms was encircled
with a royal crown. But the first of the family in fame and merit
was the elder Stephen, whom Petrarch loved and esteemed as a hero
superior to his own times, and not unworthy of ancient Rome.
Persecution and exile displayed to the nations his abilities in
peace and war; in his distress he was an object, not of pity, but
of reverence; the aspect of danger provoked him to avow his name
and country; and when he was asked, “Where is now your fortress?”
he laid his hand on his heart, and answered, “Here.” He supported
with the same virtue the return of prosperity; and, till the ruin
of his declining age, the ancestors, the character, and the
children of Stephen Colonna, exalted his dignity in the Roman
republic, and at the court of Avignon. II. The Ursini migrated
from Spoleto; 104 the sons of Ursus, as they are styled in the
twelfth century, from some eminent person, who is only known as
the father of their race. But they were soon distinguished among
the nobles of Rome, by the number and bravery of their kinsmen,
the strength of their towers, the honors of the senate and sacred
college, and the elevation of two popes, Celestin the Third and
Nicholas the Third, of their name and lineage. 105 Their riches
may be accused as an early abuse of nepotism: the estates of St.
Peter were alienated in their favor by the liberal Celestin; 106
and Nicholas was ambitious for their sake to solicit the alliance
of monarchs; to found new kingdoms in Lombardy and Tuscany; and
to invest them with the perpetual office of senators of Rome. All
that has been observed of the greatness of the Colonna will
likewise redound to the glory of the Ursini, their constant and
equal antagonists in the long hereditary feud, which distracted
above two hundred and fifty years the ecclesiastical state. The
jealously of preeminence and power was the true ground of their
quarrel; but as a specious badge of distinction, the Colonna
embraced the name of Ghibelines and the party of the empire; the
Ursini espoused the title of Guelphs and the cause of the church.
The eagle and the keys were displayed in their adverse banners;
and the two factions of Italy most furiously raged when the
origin and nature of the dispute were long since forgotten. 107
After the retreat of the popes to Avignon they disputed in arms
the vacant republic; and the mischiefs of discord were
perpetuated by the wretched compromise of electing each year two
rival senators. By their private hostilities the city and country
were desolated, and the fluctuating balance inclined with their
alternate success. But none of either family had fallen by the
sword, till the most renowned champion of the Ursini was
surprised and slain by the younger Stephen Colonna. 108 His
triumph is stained with the reproach of violating the truce;
their defeat was basely avenged by the assassination, before the
church door, of an innocent boy and his two servants. Yet the
victorious Colonna, with an annual colleague, was declared
senator of Rome during the term of five years. And the muse of
Petrarch inspired a wish, a hope, a prediction, that the generous
youth, the son of his venerable hero, would restore Rome and
Italy to their pristine glory; that his justice would extirpate
the wolves and lions, the serpents and _bears_, who labored to
subvert the eternal basis of the marble column. 109
97 (return) [ It is pity that the Colonna themselves have not
favored the world with a complete and critical history of their
illustrious house. I adhere to Muratori, (Dissert. xlii. tom.
iii. p. 647, 648.)]
98 (return) [ Pandulph. Pisan. in Vit. Paschal. II. in Muratori,
Script. Ital. tom. iii. P. i. p. 335. The family has still great
possessions in the Campagna of Rome; but they have alienated to
the Rospigliosi this original fief of _Colonna_, (Eschinard, p.
258, 259.)]
99 (return) [ “Te longinqua dedit tellus et pascua Rheni,” says
Petrarch; and, in 1417, a duke of Guelders and Juliers
acknowledges (Lenfant, Hist. du Concile de Constance, tom. ii. p.
539) his descent from the ancestors of Martin V., (Otho Colonna:)
but the royal author of the Memoirs of Brandenburg observes, that
the sceptre in his arms has been confounded with the column. To
maintain the Roman origin of the Colonna, it was ingeniously
supposed (Diario di Monaldeschi, in the Script. Ital. tom. xii.
p. 533) that a cousin of the emperor Nero escaped from the city,
and founded Mentz in Germany.]
100 (return) [ I cannot overlook the Roman triumph of ovation on
Marce Antonio Colonna, who had commanded the pope’s galleys at
the naval victory of Lepanto, (Thuan. Hist. l. 7, tom. iii. p.
55, 56. Muret. Oratio x. Opp. tom. i. p. 180—190.)]
101 (return) [ Muratori, Annali d’Italia, tom. x. p. 216, 220.]
102 (return) [ Petrarch’s attachment to the Colonna has
authorized the abbé de Sade to expatiate on the state of the
family in the fourteenth century, the persecution of Boniface
VIII., the character of Stephen and his sons, their quarrels with
the Ursini, &c., (Mémoires sur Pétrarque, tom. i. p. 98—110,
146—148, 174—176, 222—230, 275—280.) His criticism often
rectifies the hearsay stories of Villani, and the errors of the
less diligent moderns. I understand the branch of Stephen to be
now extinct.]
103 (return) [ Alexander III. had declared the Colonna who
adhered to the emperor Frederic I. incapable of holding any
ecclesiastical benefice, (Villani, l. v. c. 1;) and the last
stains of annual excommunication were purified by Sixtus V.,
(Vita di Sisto V. tom. iii. p. 416.) Treason, sacrilege, and
proscription are often the best titles of ancient nobility.]
104 (return) [
————Vallis te proxima misit, Appenninigenæ qua prata
virentia sylvæ Spoletana metunt armenta gregesque
protervi.
Monaldeschi (tom. xii. Script. Ital. p. 533) gives the Ursini a
French origin, which may be remotely true.]
105 (return) [ In the metrical life of Celestine V. by the
cardinal of St. George (Muratori, tom. iii. P. i. p. 613, &c.,)
we find a luminous, and not inelegant, passage, (l. i. c. 3, p.
203 &c.:)—
————genuit quem nobilis Ursæ (_Ursi?_) Progenies, Romana
domus, veterataque magnis Fascibus in clero, pompasque
experta senatûs, Bellorumque manû grandi stipata
parentum Cardineos apices necnon fastigia dudum Papatûs
_iterata_ tenens.
Muratori (Dissert. xlii. tom. iii.) observes, that the first
Ursini pontificate of Celestine III. was unknown: he is inclined
to read _Ursi_ progenies.]
106 (return) [ Filii Ursi, quondam Clestini papæ nepotes, de
bonis ecclesiæ Romanæ ditati, (Vit. Innocent. III. in Muratori,
Script. tom. iii. P. i.) The partial prodigality of Nicholas III.
is more conspicuous in Villani and Muratori. Yet the Ursini would
disdain the nephews of a _modern_ pope.]
107 (return) [ In his fifty-first Dissertation on the Italian
Antiquities, Muratori explains the factions of the Guelphs and
Ghibelines.]
108 (return) [ Petrarch (tom. i. p. 222—230) has celebrated this
victory according to the Colonna; but two contemporaries, a
Florentine (Giovanni Villani, l. x. c. 220) and a Roman,
(Ludovico Monaldeschi, p. 532—534,) are less favorable to their
arms.]
109 (return) [ The abbé de Sade (tom. i. Notes, p. 61—66) has
applied the vith Canzone of Petrarch, _Spirto Gentil_, &c., to
Stephen Colonna the younger:
Orsi, lupi, leoni, aquile e serpi Al una gran marmorea
_colexna_ Fanno noja sovente e à se danno.]
Chapter LXX: Final Settlement Of The Ecclesiastical State.—Part
I.
Character And Coronation Of Petrarch.—Restoration Of The Freedom
And Government Of Rome By The Tribune Rienzi.—His Virtues And
Vices, His Expulsion And Death.—Return Of The Popes From
Avignon.—Great Schism Of The West.—Reunion Of The Latin
Church.—Last Struggles Of Roman Liberty.— Statutes Of Rome.—Final
Settlement Of The Ecclesiastical State.
In the apprehension of modern times, Petrarch 1 is the Italian
songster of Laura and love. In the harmony of his Tuscan rhymes,
Italy applauds, or rather adores, the father of her lyric poetry;
and his verse, or at least his name, is repeated by the
enthusiasm, or affectation, of amorous sensibility. Whatever may
be the private taste of a stranger, his slight and superficial
knowledge should humbly acquiesce in the judgment of a learned
nation; yet I may hope or presume, that the Italians do not
compare the tedious uniformity of sonnets and elegies with the
sublime compositions of their epic muse, the original wildness of
Dante, the regular beauties of Tasso, and the boundless variety
of the incomparable Ariosto. The merits of the lover I am still
less qualified to appreciate: nor am I deeply interested in a
metaphysical passion for a nymph so shadowy, that her existence
has been questioned; 2 for a matron so prolific, 3 that she was
delivered of eleven legitimate children, 4 while her amorous
swain sighed and sung at the fountain of Vaucluse. 5 But in the
eyes of Petrarch, and those of his graver contemporaries, his
love was a sin, and Italian verse a frivolous amusement. His
Latin works of philosophy, poetry, and eloquence, established his
serious reputation, which was soon diffused from Avignon over
France and Italy: his friends and disciples were multiplied in
every city; and if the ponderous volume of his writings 6 be now
abandoned to a long repose, our gratitude must applaud the man,
who by precept and example revived the spirit and study of the
Augustan age. From his earliest youth, Petrarch aspired to the
poetic crown. The academical honors of the three faculties had
introduced a royal degree of master or doctor in the art of
poetry; 7 and the title of poet-laureate, which custom, rather
than vanity, perpetuates in the English court, 8 was first
invented by the Cæsars of Germany. In the musical games of
antiquity, a prize was bestowed on the victor: 9 the belief that
Virgil and Horace had been crowned in the Capitol inflamed the
emulation of a Latin bard; 10 and the laurel 11 was endeared to
the lover by a verbal resemblance with the name of his mistress.
The value of either object was enhanced by the difficulties of
the pursuit; and if the virtue or prudence of Laura was
inexorable, 12 he enjoyed, and might boast of enjoying, the nymph
of poetry. His vanity was not of the most delicate kind, since he
applauds the success of his own _labors_; his name was popular;
his friends were active; the open or secret opposition of envy
and prejudice was surmounted by the dexterity of patient merit.
In the thirty-sixth year of his age, he was solicited to accept
the object of his wishes; and on the same day, in the solitude of
Vaucluse, he received a similar and solemn invitation from the
senate of Rome and the university of Paris. The learning of a
theological school, and the ignorance of a lawless city, were
alike unqualified to bestow the ideal though immortal wreath
which genius may obtain from the free applause of the public and
of posterity: but the candidate dismissed this troublesome
reflection; and after some moments of complacency and suspense,
preferred the summons of the metropolis of the world.
1 (return) [ The Mémoires sur la Vie de François Pétrarque,
(Amsterdam, 1764, 1767, 3 vols. in 4to.,) form a copious,
original, and entertaining work, a labor of love, composed from
the accurate study of Petrarch and his contemporaries; but the
hero is too often lost in the general history of the age, and the
author too often languishes in the affectation of politeness and
gallantry. In the preface to his first volume, he enumerates and
weighs twenty Italian biographers, who have professedly treated
of the same subject.]
2 (return) [ The allegorical interpretation prevailed in the xvth
century; but the wise commentators were not agreed whether they
should understand by Laura, religion, or virtue, or the blessed
virgin, or————. See the prefaces to the first and second volume.]
3 (return) [ Laure de Noves, born about the year 1307, was
married in January 1325, to Hugues de Sade, a noble citizen of
Avignon, whose jealousy was not the effect of love, since he
married a second wife within seven months of her death, which
happened the 6th of April, 1348, precisely one-and-twenty years
after Petrarch had seen and loved her.]
4 (return) [ Corpus crebris partubus exhaustum: from one of these
is issued, in the tenth degree, the abbé de Sade, the fond and
grateful biographer of Petrarch; and this domestic motive most
probably suggested the idea of his work, and urged him to inquire
into every circumstance that could affect the history and
character of his grandmother, (see particularly tom. i. p.
122—133, notes, p. 7—58, tom. ii. p. 455—495 not. p. 76—82.)]
5 (return) [ Vaucluse, so familiar to our English travellers, is
described from the writings of Petrarch, and the local knowledge
of his biographer, (Mémoires, tom. i. p. 340—359.) It was, in
truth, the retreat of a hermit; and the moderns are much
mistaken, if they place Laura and a happy lover in the grotto.]
6 (return) [ Of 1250 pages, in a close print, at Basil in the
xvith century, but without the date of the year. The abbé de Sade
calls aloud for a new edition of Petrarch’s Latin works; but I
much doubt whether it would redound to the profit of the
bookseller, or the amusement of the public.]
7 (return) [ Consult Selden’s Titles of Honor, in his works,
(vol. iii. p. 457—466.) A hundred years before Petrarch, St.
Francis received the visit of a poet, qui ab imperatore fuerat
coronatus et exinde rex versuum dictus.]
8 (return) [ From Augustus to Louis, the muse has too often been
false and venal: but I much doubt whether any age or court can
produce a similar establishment of a stipendiary poet, who in
every reign, and at all events, is bound to furnish twice a year
a measure of praise and verse, such as may be sung in the chapel,
and, I believe, in the presence, of the sovereign. I speak the
more freely, as the best time for abolishing this ridiculous
custom is while the prince is a man of virtue and the poet a man
of genius.]
9 (return) [ Isocrates (in Panegyrico, tom. i. p. 116, 117, edit.
Battie, Cantab. 1729) claims for his native Athens the glory of
first instituting and recommending the alwnaV—kai ta aqla
megista—mh monon tacouV kai rwmhV, alla kai logwn kai gnwmhV. The
example of the Panathenæa was imitated at Delphi; but the Olympic
games were ignorant of a musical crown, till it was extorted by
the vain tyranny of Nero, (Sueton. in Nerone, c. 23; Philostrat.
apud Casaubon ad locum; Dion Cassius, or Xiphilin, l. lxiii. p.
1032, 1041. Potter’s Greek Antiquities, vol. i. p. 445, 450.)]
10 (return) [ The Capitoline games (certamen quinquenale,
_musicum_, equestre, gymnicum) were instituted by Domitian
(Sueton. c. 4) in the year of Christ 86, (Censorin. de Die
Natali, c. 18, p. 100, edit. Havercamp.) and were not abolished
in the ivth century, (Ausonius de Professoribus Burdegal. V.) If
the crown were given to superior merit, the exclusion of Statius
(Capitolia nostræ inficiata lyræ, Sylv. l. iii. v. 31) may do
honor to the games of the Capitol; but the Latin poets who lived
before Domitian were crowned only in the public opinion.]
11 (return) [ Petrarch and the senators of Rome were ignorant
that the laurel was not the Capitoline, but the Delphic crown,
(Plin. Hist. Natur p. 39. Hist. Critique de la République des
Lettres, tom. i. p. 150—220.) The victors in the Capitol were
crowned with a garland of oak eaves, (Martial, l. iv. epigram
54.)]
12 (return) [ The pious grandson of Laura has labored, and not
without success, to vindicate her immaculate chastity against the
censures of the grave and the sneers of the profane, (tom. ii.
notes, p. 76—82.)]
The ceremony of his coronation 13 was performed in the Capitol,
by his friend and patron the supreme magistrate of the republic.
Twelve patrician youths were arrayed in scarlet; six
representatives of the most illustrious families, in green robes,
with garlands of flowers, accompanied the procession; in the
midst of the princes and nobles, the senator, count of
Anguillara, a kinsman of the Colonna, assumed his throne; and at
the voice of a herald Petrarch arose. After discoursing on a text
of Virgil, and thrice repeating his vows for the prosperity of
Rome, he knelt before the throne, and received from the senator a
laurel crown, with a more precious declaration, “This is the
reward of merit.” The people shouted, “Long life to the Capitol
and the poet!” A sonnet in praise of Rome was accepted as the
effusion of genius and gratitude; and after the whole procession
had visited the Vatican, the profane wreath was suspended before
the shrine of St. Peter. In the act or diploma 14 which was
presented to Petrarch, the title and prerogatives of
poet-laureate are revived in the Capitol, after the lapse of
thirteen hundred years; and he receives the perpetual privilege
of wearing, at his choice, a crown of laurel, ivy, or myrtle, of
assuming the poetic habit, and of teaching, disputing,
interpreting, and composing, in all places whatsoever, and on all
subjects of literature. The grant was ratified by the authority
of the senate and people; and the character of citizen was the
recompense of his affection for the Roman name. They did him
honor, but they did him justice. In the familiar society of
Cicero and Livy, he had imbibed the ideas of an ancient patriot;
and his ardent fancy kindled every idea to a sentiment, and every
sentiment to a passion. The aspect of the seven hills and their
majestic ruins confirmed these lively impressions; and he loved a
country by whose liberal spirit he had been crowned and adopted.
The poverty and debasement of Rome excited the indignation and
pity of her grateful son; he dissembled the faults of his
fellow-citizens; applauded with partial fondness the last of
their heroes and matrons; and in the remembrance of the past, in
the hopes of the future, was pleased to forget the miseries of
the present time. Rome was still the lawful mistress of the
world: the pope and the emperor, the bishop and general, had
abdicated their station by an inglorious retreat to the Rhône and
the Danube; but if she could resume her virtue, the republic
might again vindicate her liberty and dominion. Amidst the
indulgence of enthusiasm and eloquence, 15 Petrarch, Italy, and
Europe, were astonished by a revolution which realized for a
moment his most splendid visions. The rise and fall of the
tribune Rienzi will occupy the following pages: 16 the subject is
interesting, the materials are rich, and the glance of a patriot
bard 17 will sometimes vivify the copious, but simple, narrative
of the Florentine, 18 and more especially of the Roman,
historian. 19
13 (return) [ The whole process of Petrarch’s coronation is
accurately described by the abbé de Sade, (tom. i. p. 425—435,
tom. ii. p. 1—6, notes, p. 1—13,) from his own writings, and the
Roman diary of Ludovico, Monaldeschi, without mixing in this
authentic narrative the more recent fables of Sannuccio Delbene.]
14 (return) [ The original act is printed among the Pieces
Justificatives in the Mémoires sur Pétrarque, tom. iii. p.
50—53.]
15 (return) [ To find the proofs of his enthusiasm for Rome, I
need only request that the reader would open, by chance, either
Petrarch, or his French biographer. The latter has described the
poet’s first visit to Rome, (tom. i. p. 323—335.) But in the
place of much idle rhetoric and morality, Petrarch might have
amused the present and future age with an original account of the
city and his coronation.]
16 (return) [ It has been treated by the pen of a Jesuit, the P.
de Cerceau whose posthumous work (Conjuration de Nicolas Gabrini,
dit de Rienzi, Tyran de Rome, en 1347) was published at Paris,
1748, in 12mo. I am indebted to him for some facts and documents
in John Hocsemius, canon of Liege, a contemporary historian,
(Fabricius Bibliot. Lat. Med. Ævi, tom. iii. p. 273, tom. iv. p.
85.)]
17 (return) [ The abbé de Sade, who so freely expatiates on the
history of the xivth century, might treat, as his proper subject,
a revolution in which the heart of Petrarch was so deeply
engaged, (Mémoires, tom. ii. p. 50, 51, 320—417, notes, p. 70—76,
tom. iii. p. 221—243, 366—375.) Not an idea or a fact in the
writings of Petrarch has probably escaped him.]
18 (return) [ Giovanni Villani, l. xii. c. 89, 104, in Muratori,
Rerum Italicarum Scriptores, tom. xiii. p. 969, 970, 981—983.]
19 (return) [ In his third volume of Italian antiquities, (p.
249—548,) Muratori has inserted the Fragmenta Historiæ Romanæ ab
Anno 1327 usque ad Annum 1354, in the original dialect of Rome or
Naples in the xivth century, and a Latin version for the benefit
of strangers. It contains the most particular and authentic life
of Cola (Nicholas) di Rienzi; which had been printed at
Bracciano, 1627, in 4to., under the name of Tomaso Fortifiocca,
who is only mentioned in this work as having been punished by the
tribune for forgery. Human nature is scarcely capable of such
sublime or stupid impartiality: but whosoever in the author of
these Fragments, he wrote on the spot and at the time, and
paints, without design or art, the manners of Rome and the
character of the tribune. * Note: Since the publication of my
first edition of Gibbon, some new and very remarkable documents
have been brought to light in a life of Nicolas Rienzi,—Cola di
Rienzo und seine Zeit,—by Dr. Felix Papencordt. The most
important of these documents are letters from Rienzi to Charles
the Fourth, emperor and king of Bohemia, and to the archbishop of
Praque; they enter into the whole history of his adventurous
career during its first period, and throw a strong light upon his
extraordinary character. These documents were first discovered
and made use of, to a certain extent, by Pelzel, the historian of
Bohemia. The originals have disappeared, but a copy made by
Pelzel for his own use is now in the library of Count Thun at
Teschen. There seems no doubt of their authenticity. Dr.
Papencordt has printed the whole in his Urkunden, with the
exception of one long theological paper.—M. 1845.]
In a quarter of the city which was inhabited only by mechanics
and Jews, the marriage of an innkeeper and a washer woman
produced the future deliverer of Rome. 20 201 From such parents
Nicholas Rienzi Gabrini could inherit neither dignity nor
fortune; and the gift of a liberal education, which they
painfully bestowed, was the cause of his glory and untimely end.
The study of history and eloquence, the writings of Cicero,
Seneca, Livy, Cæsar, and Valerius Maximus, elevated above his
equals and contemporaries the genius of the young plebeian: he
perused with indefatigable diligence the manuscripts and marbles
of antiquity; loved to dispense his knowledge in familiar
language; and was often provoked to exclaim, “Where are now these
Romans? their virtue, their justice, their power? why was I not
born in those happy times?” 21 When the republic addressed to the
throne of Avignon an embassy of the three orders, the spirit and
eloquence of Rienzi recommended him to a place among the thirteen
deputies of the commons. The orator had the honor of haranguing
Pope Clement the Sixth, and the satisfaction of conversing with
Petrarch, a congenial mind: but his aspiring hopes were chilled
by disgrace and poverty and the patriot was reduced to a single
garment and the charity of the hospital. 211 From this misery he
was relieved by the sense of merit or the smile of favor; and the
employment of apostolic notary afforded him a daily stipend of
five gold florins, a more honorable and extensive connection, and
the right of contrasting, both in words and actions, his own
integrity with the vices of the state. The eloquence of Rienzi
was prompt and persuasive: the multitude is always prone to envy
and censure: he was stimulated by the loss of a brother and the
impunity of the assassins; nor was it possible to excuse or
exaggerate the public calamities. The blessings of peace and
justice, for which civil society has been instituted, were
banished from Rome: the jealous citizens, who might have endured
every personal or pecuniary injury, were most deeply wounded in
the dishonor of their wives and daughters: 22 they were equally
oppressed by the arrogance of the nobles and the corruption of
the magistrates; 221 and the abuse of arms or of laws was the
only circumstance that distinguished the lions from the dogs and
serpents of the Capitol. These allegorical emblems were variously
repeated in the pictures which Rienzi exhibited in the streets
and churches; and while the spectators gazed with curious wonder,
the bold and ready orator unfolded the meaning, applied the
satire, inflamed their passions, and announced a distant hope of
comfort and deliverance. The privileges of Rome, her eternal
sovereignty over her princes and provinces, was the theme of his
public and private discourse; and a monument of servitude became
in his hands a title and incentive of liberty. The decree of the
senate, which granted the most ample prerogatives to the emperor
Vespasian, had been inscribed on a copper plate still extant in
the choir of the church of St. John Lateran. 23 A numerous
assembly of nobles and plebeians was invited to this political
lecture, and a convenient theatre was erected for their
reception. The notary appeared in a magnificent and mysterious
habit, explained the inscription by a version and commentary, 24
and descanted with eloquence and zeal on the ancient glories of
the senate and people, from whom all legal authority was derived.
The supine ignorance of the nobles was incapable of discerning
the serious tendency of such representations: they might
sometimes chastise with words and blows the plebeian reformer;
but he was often suffered in the Colonna palace to amuse the
company with his threats and predictions; and the modern Brutus
25 was concealed under the mask of folly and the character of a
buffoon. While they indulged their contempt, the restoration of
the _good estate_, his favorite expression, was entertained among
the people as a desirable, a possible, and at length as an
approaching, event; and while all had the disposition to applaud,
some had the courage to assist, their promised deliverer.
20 (return) [ The first and splendid period of Rienzi, his
tribunitian government, is contained in the xviiith chapter of
the Fragments, (p. 399—479,) which, in the new division, forms
the iid book of the history in xxxviii. smaller chapters or
sections.]
201 (return) [ But see in Dr. Papencordt’s work, and in Rienzi’s
own words, his claim to be a bastard son of the emperor Henry the
Seventh, whose intrigue with his mother Rienzi relates with a
sort of proud shamelessness. Compare account by the editor of Dr.
Papencordt’s work in Quarterly Review vol. lxix.—M. 1845.]
21 (return) [ The reader may be pleased with a specimen of the
original idiom: Fò da soa juventutine nutricato di latte de
eloquentia, bono gramatico, megliore rettuorico, autorista bravo.
Deh como et quanto era veloce leitore! moito usava Tito Livio,
Seneca, et Tullio, et Balerio Massimo, moito li dilettava le
magnificentie di Julio Cesare raccontare. Tutta la die se
speculava negl’ intagli di marmo lequali iaccio intorno Roma. Non
era altri che esso, che sapesse lejere li antichi pataffii. Tutte
scritture antiche vulgarizzava; quesse fiure di marmo justamente
interpretava. On come spesso diceva, “Dove suono quelli buoni
Romani? dove ene loro somma justitia? poleramme trovare in tempo
che quessi fiuriano!”]
211 (return) [ Sir J. Hobhouse published (in his Illustrations of
Childe Harold) Rienzi’s joyful letter to the people of Rome on
the apparently favorable termination of this mission.—M. 1845.]
22 (return) [ Petrarch compares the jealousy of the Romans with
the easy temper of the husbands of Avignon, (Mémoires, tom. i. p.
330.)]
221 (return) [ All this Rienzi, writing at a later period to the
archbishop of Prague, attributed to the criminal abandonment of
his flock by the supreme pontiff. See Urkunde apud Papencordt, p.
xliv. Quarterly Review, p. 255.—M. 1845.]
23 (return) [ The fragments of the _Lex regia_ may be found in
the Inscriptions of Gruter, tom. i. p. 242, and at the end of the
Tacitus of Ernesti, with some learned notes of the editor, tom.
ii.]
24 (return) [ I cannot overlook a stupendous and laughable
blunder of Rienzi. The Lex regia empowers Vespasian to enlarge
the Pomrium, a word familiar to every antiquary. It was not so to
the tribune; he confounds it with pom_a_rium, an orchard,
translates lo Jardino de Roma cioene Italia, and is copied by the
less excusable ignorance of the Latin translator (p. 406) and the
French historian, (p. 33.) Even the learning of Muratori has
slumbered over the passage.]
25 (return) [ Priori (_Bruto_) tamen similior, juvenis uterque,
longe ingenio quam cujus simulationem induerat, ut sub hoc
obtentû liberator ille P R. aperiretur tempore suo.... Ille
regibus, hic tyrannis contemptus, (Opp. p. 536.) * Note: Fatcor
attamen quod-nunc fatuum. nunc hystrionem, nunc gravem nunc
simplicem, nunc astutum, nunc fervidum, nunc timidum simulatorem,
et dissimulatorem ad hunc caritativum finem, quem dixi,
constitusepius memet ipsum. Writing to an archbishop, (of
Prague,) Rienzi alleges scriptural examples. Saltator coram archa
David et insanus apparuit coram Rege; blanda, astuta, et tecta
Judith astitit Holoferni; et astute Jacob meruit benedici,
Urkunde xlix.—M. 1845.]
A prophecy, or rather a summons, affixed on the church door of
St. George, was the first public evidence of his designs; a
nocturnal assembly of a hundred citizens on Mount Aventine, the
first step to their execution. After an oath of secrecy and aid,
he represented to the conspirators the importance and facility of
their enterprise; that the nobles, without union or resources,
were strong only in the fear nobles, of their imaginary strength;
that all power, as well as right, was in the hands of the people;
that the revenues of the apostolical chamber might relieve the
public distress; and that the pope himself would approve their
victory over the common enemies of government and freedom. After
securing a faithful band to protect his first declaration, he
proclaimed through the city, by sound of trumpet, that on the
evening of the following day, all persons should assemble without
arms before the church of St. Angelo, to provide for the
reestablishment of the good estate. The whole night was employed
in the celebration of thirty masses of the Holy Ghost; and in the
morning, Rienzi, bareheaded, but in complete armor, issued from
the church, encompassed by the hundred conspirators. The pope’s
vicar, the simple bishop of Orvieto, who had been persuaded to
sustain a part in this singular ceremony, marched on his right
hand; and three great standards were borne aloft as the emblems
of their design. In the first, the banner of _liberty_, Rome was
seated on two lions, with a palm in one hand and a globe in the
other; St. Paul, with a drawn sword, was delineated in the banner
of _justice_; and in the third, St. Peter held the keys of
_concord_ and _peace_. Rienzi was encouraged by the presence and
applause of an innumerable crowd, who understood little, and
hoped much; and the procession slowly rolled forwards from the
castle of St. Angelo to the Capitol. His triumph was disturbed by
some secret emotions which he labored to suppress: he ascended
without opposition, and with seeming confidence, the citadel of
the republic; harangued the people from the balcony; and received
the most flattering confirmation of his acts and laws. The
nobles, as if destitute of arms and counsels, beheld in silent
consternation this strange revolution; and the moment had been
prudently chosen, when the most formidable, Stephen Colonna, was
absent from the city. On the first rumor, he returned to his
palace, affected to despise this plebeian tumult, and declared to
the messenger of Rienzi, that at his leisure he would cast the
madman from the windows of the Capitol. The great bell instantly
rang an alarm, and so rapid was the tide, so urgent was the
danger, that Colonna escaped with precipitation to the suburb of
St. Laurence: from thence, after a moment’s refreshment, he
continued the same speedy career till he reached in safety his
castle of Palestrina; lamenting his own imprudence, which had not
trampled the spark of this mighty conflagration. A general and
peremptory order was issued from the Capitol to all the nobles,
that they should peaceably retire to their estates: they obeyed;
and their departure secured the tranquillity of the free and
obedient citizens of Rome.
But such voluntary obedience evaporates with the first transports
of zeal; and Rienzi felt the importance of justifying his
usurpation by a regular form and a legal title. At his own
choice, the Roman people would have displayed their attachment
and authority, by lavishing on his head the names of senator or
consul, of king or emperor: he preferred the ancient and modest
appellation of tribune; 251 the protection of the commons was the
essence of that sacred office; and they were ignorant, that it
had never been invested with any share in the legislative or
executive powers of the republic. In this character, and with the
consent of the Roman, the tribune enacted the most salutary laws
for the restoration and maintenance of the good estate. By the
first he fulfils the wish of honesty and inexperience, that no
civil suit should be protracted beyond the term of fifteen days.
The danger of frequent perjury might justify the pronouncing
against a false accuser the same penalty which his evidence would
have inflicted: the disorders of the times might compel the
legislator to punish every homicide with death, and every injury
with equal retaliation. But the execution of justice was hopeless
till he had previously abolished the tyranny of the nobles. It
was formally provided, that none, except the supreme magistrate,
should possess or command the gates, bridges, or towers of the
state; that no private garrisons should be introduced into the
towns or castles of the Roman territory; that none should bear
arms, or presume to fortify their houses in the city or country;
that the barons should be responsible for the safety of the
highways, and the free passage of provisions; and that the
protection of malefactors and robbers should be expiated by a
fine of a thousand marks of silver. But these regulations would
have been impotent and nugatory, had not the licentious nobles
been awed by the sword of the civil power. A sudden alarm from
the bell of the Capitol could still summon to the standard above
twenty thousand volunteers: the support of the tribune and the
laws required a more regular and permanent force. In each harbor
of the coast a vessel was stationed for the assurance of
commerce; a standing militia of three hundred and sixty horse and
thirteen hundred foot was levied, clothed, and paid in the
thirteen quarters of the city: and the spirit of a commonwealth
may be traced in the grateful allowance of one hundred florins,
or pounds, to the heirs of every soldier who lost his life in the
service of his country. For the maintenance of the public
defence, for the establishment of granaries, for the relief of
widows, orphans, and indigent convents, Rienzi applied, without
fear of sacrilege, the revenues of the apostolic chamber: the
three branches of hearth-money, the salt-duty, and the customs,
were each of the annual produce of one hundred thousand florins;
26 and scandalous were the abuses, if in four or five months the
amount of the salt-duty could be trebled by his judicious
economy. After thus restoring the forces and finances of the
republic, the tribune recalled the nobles from their solitary
independence; required their personal appearance in the Capitol;
and imposed an oath of allegiance to the new government, and of
submission to the laws of the good estate. Apprehensive for their
safety, but still more apprehensive of the danger of a refusal,
the princes and barons returned to their houses at Rome in the
garb of simple and peaceful citizens: the Colonna and Ursini, the
Savelli and Frangipani, were confounded before the tribunal of a
plebeian, of the vile buffoon whom they had so often derided, and
their disgrace was aggravated by the indignation which they
vainly struggled to disguise. The same oath was successively
pronounced by the several orders of society, the clergy and
gentlemen, the judges and notaries, the merchants and artisans,
and the gradual descent was marked by the increase of sincerity
and zeal. They swore to live and die with the republic and the
church, whose interest was artfully united by the nominal
association of the bishop of Orvieto, the pope’s vicar, to the
office of tribune. It was the boast of Rienzi, that he had
delivered the throne and patrimony of St. Peter from a rebellious
aristocracy; and Clement the Sixth, who rejoiced in its fall,
affected to believe the professions, to applaud the merits, and
to confirm the title, of his trusty servant. The speech, perhaps
the mind, of the tribune, was inspired with a lively regard for
the purity of the faith: he insinuated his claim to a
supernatural mission from the Holy Ghost; enforced by a heavy
forfeiture the annual duty of confession and communion; and
strictly guarded the spiritual as well as temporal welfare of his
faithful people. 27
251 (return) [ Et ego, Deo semper auctore, ipsa die pristinâ
(leg. primâ) Tribunatus, quæ quidem dignitas a tempore deflorati
Imperii, et per annos Vo et ultra sub tyrannicà occupatione
vacavit, ipsos omnes potentes indifferenter Deum at justitiam
odientes, a meâ, ymo a Dei facie fugiendo vehementi Spiritu
dissipavi, et nullo effuso cruore trementes expuli, sine ictu
remanente Romane terre facie renovatâ. Libellus Tribuni ad
Cæsarem, p. xxxiv.—M. 1845.]
26 (return) [ In one MS. I read (l. ii. c. 4, p. 409) perfumante
quatro _solli_, in another, quatro _florini_, an important
variety, since the florin was worth ten Roman _solidi_,
(Muratori, dissert. xxviii.) The former reading would give us a
population of 25,000, the latter of 250,000 families; and I much
fear, that the former is more consistent with the decay of Rome
and her territory.]
27 (return) [ Hocsemius, p. 498, apud du Cerçeau, Hist. de
Rienzi, p. 194. The fifteen tribunitian laws may be found in the
Roman historian (whom for brevity I shall name) Fortifiocca, l.
ii. c. 4.]
Chapter LXX: Final Settlement Of The Ecclesiastical State.—Part
II.
Never perhaps has the energy and effect of a single mind been
more remarkably felt than in the sudden, though transient,
reformation of Rome by the tribune Rienzi. A den of robbers was
converted to the discipline of a camp or convent: patient to
hear, swift to redress, inexorable to punish, his tribunal was
always accessible to the poor and stranger; nor could birth, or
dignity, or the immunities of the church, protect the offender or
his accomplices. The privileged houses, the private sanctuaries
in Rome, on which no officer of justice would presume to
trespass, were abolished; and he applied the timber and iron of
their barricades in the fortifications of the Capitol. The
venerable father of the Colonna was exposed in his own palace to
the double shame of being desirous, and of being unable, to
protect a criminal. A mule, with a jar of oil, had been stolen
near Capranica; and the lord of the Ursini family was condemned
to restore the damage, and to discharge a fine of four hundred
florins for his negligence in guarding the highways. Nor were the
persons of the barons more inviolate than their lands or houses;
and, either from accident or design, the same impartial rigor was
exercised against the heads of the adverse factions. Peter Agapet
Colonna, who had himself been senator of Rome, was arrested in
the street for injury or debt; and justice was appeased by the
tardy execution of Martin Ursini, who, among his various acts of
violence and rapine, had pillaged a shipwrecked vessel at the
mouth of the Tyber. 28 His name, the purple of two cardinals, his
uncles, a recent marriage, and a mortal disease were disregarded
by the inflexible tribune, who had chosen his victim. The public
officers dragged him from his palace and nuptial bed: his trial
was short and satisfactory: the bell of the Capitol convened the
people: stripped of his mantle, on his knees, with his hands
bound behind his back, he heard the sentence of death; and after
a brief confession, Ursini was led away to the gallows. After
such an example, none who were conscious of guilt could hope for
impunity, and the flight of the wicked, the licentious, and the
idle, soon purified the city and territory of Rome. In this time
(says the historian,) the woods began to rejoice that they were
no longer infested with robbers; the oxen began to plough; the
pilgrims visited the sanctuaries; the roads and inns were
replenished with travellers; trade, plenty, and good faith, were
restored in the markets; and a purse of gold might be exposed
without danger in the midst of the highway. As soon as the life
and property of the subject are secure, the labors and rewards of
industry spontaneously revive: Rome was still the metropolis of
the Christian world; and the fame and fortunes of the tribune
were diffused in every country by the strangers who had enjoyed
the blessings of his government.
28 (return) [ Fortifiocca, l. ii. c. 11. From the account of this
shipwreck, we learn some circumstances of the trade and
navigation of the age. 1. The ship was built and freighted at
Naples for the ports of Marseilles and Avignon. 2. The sailors
were of Naples and the Isle of naria less skilful than those of
Sicily and Genoa. 3. The navigation from Marseilles was a
coasting voyage to the mouth of the Tyber, where they took
shelter in a storm; but, instead of finding the current,
unfortunately ran on a shoal: the vessel was stranded, the
mariners escaped. 4. The cargo, which was pillaged, consisted of
the revenue of Provence for the royal treasury, many bags of
pepper and cinnamon, and bales of French cloth, to the value of
20,000 florins; a rich prize.]
The deliverance of his country inspired Rienzi with a vast, and
perhaps visionary, idea of uniting Italy in a great federative
republic, of which Rome should be the ancient and lawful head,
and the free cities and princes the members and associates. His
pen was not less eloquent than his tongue; and his numerous
epistles were delivered to swift and trusty messengers. On foot,
with a white wand in their hand, they traversed the forests and
mountains; enjoyed, in the most hostile states, the sacred
security of ambassadors; and reported, in the style of flattery
or truth, that the highways along their passage were lined with
kneeling multitudes, who implored Heaven for the success of their
undertaking. Could passion have listened to reason; could private
interest have yielded to the public welfare; the supreme tribunal
and confederate union of the Italian republic might have healed
their intestine discord, and closed the Alps against the
Barbarians of the North. But the propitious season had elapsed;
and if Venice, Florence, Sienna, Perugia, and many inferior
cities offered their lives and fortunes to the good estate, the
tyrants of Lombardy and Tuscany must despise, or hate, the
plebeian author of a free constitution. From them, however, and
from every part of Italy, the tribune received the most friendly
and respectful answers: they were followed by the ambassadors of
the princes and republics; and in this foreign conflux, on all
the occasions of pleasure or business, the low born notary could
assume the familiar or majestic courtesy of a sovereign. 29 The
most glorious circumstance of his reign was an appeal to his
justice from Lewis, king of Hungary, who complained, that his
brother and her husband had been perfidiously strangled by Jane,
queen of Naples: 30 her guilt or innocence was pleaded in a
solemn trial at Rome; but after hearing the advocates, 31 the
tribune adjourned this weighty and invidious cause, which was
soon determined by the sword of the Hungarian. Beyond the Alps,
more especially at Avignon, the revolution was the theme of
curiosity, wonder, and applause. 311 Petrarch had been the
private friend, perhaps the secret counsellor, of Rienzi: his
writings breathe the most ardent spirit of patriotism and joy;
and all respect for the pope, all gratitude for the Colonna, was
lost in the superior duties of a Roman citizen. The poet-laureate
of the Capitol maintains the act, applauds the hero, and mingles
with some apprehension and advice, the most lofty hopes of the
permanent and rising greatness of the republic. 32
29 (return) [ It was thus that Oliver Cromwell’s old
acquaintance, who remembered his vulgar and ungracious entrance
into the House of Commons, were astonished at the ease and
majesty of the protector on his throne, (See Harris’s Life of
Cromwell, p. 27—34, from Clarendon Warwick, Whitelocke, Waller,
&c.) The consciousness of merit and power will sometimes elevate
the manners to the station.]
30 (return) [ See the causes, circumstances, and effects of the
death of Andrew in Giannone, (tom. iii. l. xxiii. p. 220—229,)
and the Life of Petrarch (Mémoires, tom. ii. p. 143—148, 245—250,
375—379, notes, p. 21—37.) The abbé de Sade _wishes_ to extenuate
her guilt.]
31 (return) [ The advocate who pleaded against Jane could add
nothing to the logical force and brevity of his master’s epistle.
Johanna! inordinata vita præcedens, retentio potestatis in regno,
neglecta vindicta, vir alter susceptus, et excusatio subsequens,
necis viri tui te probant fuisse participem et consortem. Jane of
Naples, and Mary of Scotland, have a singular conformity.]
311 (return) [ In his letter to the archbishop of Prague, Rienzi
thus describes the effect of his elevation on Italy and on the
world: “Did I not restore real peace among the cities which were
distracted by factions? did I not cause all the citizens, exiled
by party violence, with their wretched wives and children, to be
readmitted? had I not begun to extinguish the factious names
(scismatica nomina) of Guelf and Ghibelline, for which countless
thousands had perished body and soul, under the eyes of their
pastors, by the reduction of the city of Rome and all Italy into
one amicable, peaceful, holy, and united confederacy? the
consecrated standards and banners having been by me collected and
blended together, and, in witness to our holy association and
perfect union, offered up in the presence of the ambassadors of
all the cities of Italy, on the day of the assumption of our
Blessed Lady.” p. xlvii. ——In the Libellus ad Cæsarem: “I
received the homage and submission of all the sovereigns of
Apulia, the barons and counts, and almost all the people of
Italy. I was honored by solemn embassies and letters by the
emperor of Constantinople and the king of England. The queen of
Naples submitted herself and her kingdom to the protection of the
tribune. The king of Hungary, by two solemn embassies, brought
his cause against his queen and his nobles before my tribunal;
and I venture to say further, that the fame of the tribune
alarmed the soldan of Babylon. When the Christian pilgrims to the
sepulchre of our Lord related to the Christian and Jewish
inhabitants of Jerusalem all the yet unheard-of and wonderful
circumstances of the reformation in Rome, both Jews and
Christians celebrated the event with unusual festivities. When
the soldan inquired the cause of these rejoicings, and received
this intelligence about Rome, he ordered all the havens and
cities on the coast to be fortified, and put in a state of
defence,” p. xxxv.—M. 1845.]
32 (return) [ See the Epistola Hortatoria de Capessenda
Republica, from Petrarch to Nicholas Rienzi, (Opp. p. 535—540,)
and the vth eclogue or pastoral, a perpetual and obscure
allegory.]
While Petrarch indulged these prophetic visions, the Roman hero
was fast declining from the meridian of fame and power; and the
people, who had gazed with astonishment on the ascending meteor,
began to mark the irregularity of its course, and the
vicissitudes of light and obscurity. More eloquent than
judicious, more enterprising than resolute, the faculties of
Rienzi were not balanced by cool and commanding reason: he
magnified in a tenfold proportion the objects of hope and fear;
and prudence, which could not have erected, did not presume to
fortify, his throne. In the blaze of prosperity, his virtues were
insensibly tinctured with the adjacent vices; justice with
cruelty, liberality with profusion, and the desire of fame with
puerile and ostentatious vanity. 321 He might have learned, that
the ancient tribunes, so strong and sacred in the public opinion,
were not distinguished in style, habit, or appearance, from an
ordinary plebeian; 33 and that as often as they visited the city
on foot, a single viator, or beadle, attended the exercise of
their office. The Gracchi would have frowned or smiled, could
they have read the sonorous titles and epithets of their
successor, “Nicholas, severe and merciful; deliverer of Rome;
defender of Italy; 34 friend of mankind, and of liberty, peace,
and justice; tribune august:” his theatrical pageants had
prepared the revolution; but Rienzi abused, in luxury and pride,
the political maxim of speaking to the eyes, as well as the
understanding, of the multitude. From nature he had received the
gift of a handsome person, 35 till it was swelled and disfigured
by intemperance: and his propensity to laughter was corrected in
the magistrate by the affectation of gravity and sternness. He
was clothed, at least on public occasions, in a party-colored
robe of velvet or satin, lined with fur, and embroidered with
gold: the rod of justice, which he carried in his hand, was a
sceptre of polished steel, crowned with a globe and cross of
gold, and enclosing a small fragment of the true and holy wood.
In his civil and religious processions through the city, he rode
on a white steed, the symbol of royalty: the great banner of the
republic, a sun with a circle of stars, a dove with an olive
branch, was displayed over his head; a shower of gold and silver
was scattered among the populace, fifty guards with halberds
encompassed his person; a troop of horse preceded his march; and
their tymbals and trumpets were of massy silver.
321 (return) [ An illustrious female writer has drawn, with a
single stroke, the character of Rienzi, Crescentius, and Arnold
of Brescia, the fond restorers of Roman liberty: ‘Qui ont pris
les souvenirs pour les espérances.’ Corinne, tom. i. p. 159.
“Could Tacitus have excelled this?” Hallam, vol i p. 418.—M.]
33 (return) [ In his Roman Questions, Plutarch (Opuscul. tom. i.
p. 505, 506, edit. Græc. Hen. Steph.) states, on the most
constitutional principles, the simple greatness of the tribunes,
who were not properly magistrates, but a check on magistracy. It
was their duty and interest omoiousqai schmati, kai stolh kai
diaithtoiV epitugcanousi tvn politvn.... katapateisqai dei (a
saying of C. Curio) kai mh semnon einai th oyei mhde
dusprosodon... osw de mallon ektapeinoutai tv swmati, tosoutw
mallon auxetai th dunamei, &c. Rienzi, and Petrarch himself, were
incapable perhaps of reading a Greek philosopher; but they might
have imbibed the same modest doctrines from their favorite
Latins, Livy and Valerius Maximus.]
34 (return) [ I could not express in English the forcible, though
barbarous, title of _Zelator_ Italiæ, which Rienzi assumed.]
35 (return) [ Era bell’ homo, (l. ii. c. l. p. 399.) It is
remarkable, that the riso sarcastico of the Bracciano edition is
wanting in the Roman MS., from which Muratori has given the text.
In his second reign, when he is painted almost as a monster,
Rienzi travea una ventresca tonna trionfale, a modo de uno Abbate
Asiano, or Asinino, (l. iii. c. 18, p. 523.)]
The ambition of the honors of chivalry 36 betrayed the meanness
of his birth, and degraded the importance of his office; and the
equestrian tribune was not less odious to the nobles, whom he
adopted, than to the plebeians, whom he deserted. All that yet
remained of treasure, or luxury, or art, was exhausted on that
solemn day. Rienzi led the procession from the Capitol to the
Lateran; the tediousness of the way was relieved with decorations
and games; the ecclesiastical, civil, and military orders marched
under their various banners; the Roman ladies attended his wife;
and the ambassadors of Italy might loudly applaud or secretly
deride the novelty of the pomp. In the evening, which they had
reached the church and palace of Constantine, he thanked and
dismissed the numerous assembly, with an invitation to the
festival of the ensuing day. From the hands of a venerable knight
he received the order of the Holy Ghost; the purification of the
bath was a previous ceremony; but in no step of his life did
Rienzi excite such scandal and censure as by the profane use of
the porphyry vase, in which Constantine (a foolish legend) had
been healed of his leprosy by Pope Sylvester. 37 With equal
presumption the tribune watched or reposed within the consecrated
precincts of the baptistery; and the failure of his state-bed was
interpreted as an omen of his approaching downfall. At the hour
of worship, he showed himself to the returning crowds in a
majestic attitude, with a robe of purple, his sword, and gilt
spurs; but the holy rites were soon interrupted by his levity and
insolence. Rising from his throne, and advancing towards the
congregation, he proclaimed in a loud voice: “We summon to our
tribunal Pope Clement: and command him to reside in his diocese
of Rome: we also summon the sacred college of cardinals. 38 We
again summon the two pretenders, Charles of Bohemia and Lewis of
Bavaria, who style themselves emperors: we likewise summon all
the electors of Germany, to inform us on what pretence they have
usurped the inalienable right of the Roman people, the ancient
and lawful sovereigns of the empire.” 39 Unsheathing his maiden
sword, he thrice brandished it to the three parts of the world,
and thrice repeated the extravagant declaration, “And this too is
mine!” The pope’s vicar, the bishop of Orvieto, attempted to
check this career of folly; but his feeble protest was silenced
by martial music; and instead of withdrawing from the assembly,
he consented to dine with his brother tribune, at a table which
had hitherto been reserved for the supreme pontiff. A banquet,
such as the Cæsars had given, was prepared for the Romans. The
apartments, porticos, and courts of the Lateran were spread with
innumerable tables for either sex, and every condition; a stream
of wine flowed from the nostrils of Constantine’s brazen horse;
no complaint, except of the scarcity of water, could be heard;
and the licentiousness of the multitude was curbed by discipline
and fear. A subsequent day was appointed for the coronation of
Rienzi; 40 seven crowns of different leaves or metals were
successively placed on his head by the most eminent of the Roman
clergy; they represented the seven gifts of the Holy Ghost; and
he still professed to imitate the example of the ancient
tribunes. 401 These extraordinary spectacles might deceive or
flatter the people; and their own vanity was gratified in the
vanity of their leader. But in his private life he soon deviated
from the strict rule of frugality and abstinence; and the
plebeians, who were awed by the splendor of the nobles, were
provoked by the luxury of their equal. His wife, his son, his
uncle, (a barber in name and profession,) exposed the contrast of
vulgar manners and princely expense; and without acquiring the
majesty, Rienzi degenerated into the vices, of a king.
36 (return) [ Strange as it may seem, this festival was not
without a precedent. In the year 1327, two barons, a Colonna and
an Ursini, the usual balance, were created knights by the Roman
people: their bath was of rose-water, their beds were decked with
royal magnificence, and they were served at St. Maria of Araceli
in the Capitol, by the twenty-eight _buoni huomini_. They
afterwards received from Robert, king of Naples, the sword of
chivalry, (Hist. Rom. l. i. c. 2, p. 259.)]
37 (return) [ All parties believed in the leprosy and bath of
Constantine (Petrarch. Epist. Famil. vi. 2,) and Rienzi justified
his own conduct by observing to the court of Avignon, that a vase
which had been used by a Pagan could not be profaned by a pious
Christian. Yet this crime is specified in the bull of
excommunication, (Hocsemius, apud du Cerçeau, p. 189, 190.)]
38 (return) [ This _verbal_ summons of Pope Clement VI., which
rests on the authority of the Roman historian and a Vatican MS.,
is disputed by the biographer of Petrarch, (tom. ii. not. p.
70—76), with arguments rather of decency than of weight. The
court of Avignon might not choose to agitate this delicate
question.]
39 (return) [ The summons of the two rival emperors, a monument
of freedom and folly, is extant in Hocsemius, (Cerçeau, p.
163—166.)]
40 (return) [ It is singular, that the Roman historian should
have overlooked this sevenfold coronation, which is sufficiently
proved by internal evidence, and the testimony of Hocsemius, and
even of Rienzi, (Cercean p. 167—170, 229.)]
401 (return) [ It was on this occasion that he made the profane
comparison between himself and our Lord; and the striking
circumstance took place which he relates in his letter to the
archbishop of Prague. In the midst of all the wild and joyous
exultation of the people, one of his most zealous supporters, a
monk, who was in high repute for his sanctity, stood apart in a
corner of the church and wept bitterly! A domestic chaplain of
Rienzi’s inquired the cause of his grief. “Now,” replied the man
of God, “is thy master cast down from heaven—never saw I man so
proud. By the aid of the Holy Ghost he has driven the tyrants
from the city without drawing a sword; the cities and the
sovereigns of Italy have submitted to his power. Why is he so
arrogant and ungrateful towards the Most High? Why does he seek
earthly and transitory rewards for his labors, and in his wanton
speech liken himself to the Creator? Tell thy master that he can
only atone for this offence by tears of penitence.” In the
evening the chaplain communicated this solemn rebuke to the
tribune: it appalled him for the time, but was soon forgotten in
the tumult and hurry of business.—M. 1845.]
A simple citizen describes with pity, or perhaps with pleasure,
the humiliation of the barons of Rome. “Bareheaded, their hands
crossed on their breast, they stood with downcast looks in the
presence of the tribune; and they trembled, good God, how they
trembled!” 41 As long as the yoke of Rienzi was that of justice
and their country, their conscience forced them to esteem the
man, whom pride and interest provoked them to hate: his
extravagant conduct soon fortified their hatred by contempt; and
they conceived the hope of subverting a power which was no longer
so deeply rooted in the public confidence. The old animosity of
the Colonna and Ursini was suspended for a moment by their common
disgrace: they associated their wishes, and perhaps their
designs; an assassin was seized and tortured; he accused the
nobles; and as soon as Rienzi deserved the fate, he adopted the
suspicions and maxims, of a tyrant. On the same day, under
various pretences, he invited to the Capitol his principal
enemies, among whom were five members of the Ursini and three of
the Colonna name. But instead of a council or a banquet, they
found themselves prisoners under the sword of despotism or
justice; and the consciousness of innocence or guilt might
inspire them with equal apprehensions of danger. At the sound of
the great bell the people assembled; they were arraigned for a
conspiracy against the tribune’s life; and though some might
sympathize in their distress, not a hand, nor a voice, was raised
to rescue the first of the nobility from their impending doom.
Their apparent boldness was prompted by despair; they passed in
separate chambers a sleepless and painful night; and the
venerable hero, Stephen Colonna, striking against the door of his
prison, repeatedly urged his guards to deliver him by a speedy
death from such ignominious servitude. In the morning they
understood their sentence from the visit of a confessor and the
tolling of the bell. The great hall of the Capitol had been
decorated for the bloody scene with red and white hangings: the
countenance of the tribune was dark and severe; the swords of the
executioners were unsheathed; and the barons were interrupted in
their dying speeches by the sound of trumpets. But in this
decisive moment, Rienzi was not less anxious or apprehensive than
his captives: he dreaded the splendor of their names, their
surviving kinsmen, the inconstancy of the people, the reproaches
of the world, and, after rashly offering a mortal injury, he
vainly presumed that, if he could forgive, he might himself be
forgiven. His elaborate oration was that of a Christian and a
suppliant; and, as the humble minister of the commons, he
entreated his masters to pardon these noble criminals, for whose
repentance and future service he pledged his faith and authority.
“If you are spared,” said the tribune, “by the mercy of the
Romans, will you not promise to support the good estate with your
lives and fortunes?” Astonished by this marvellous clemency, the
barons bowed their heads; and while they devoutly repeated the
oath of allegiance, might whisper a secret, and more sincere,
assurance of revenge. A priest, in the name of the people,
pronounced their absolution: they received the communion with the
tribune, assisted at the banquet, followed the procession; and,
after every spiritual and temporal sign of reconciliation, were
dismissed in safety to their respective homes, with the new
honors and titles of generals, consuls, and patricians. 42
41 (return) [ Puoi se faceva stare denante a se, mentre sedeva,
li baroni tutti in piedi ritti co le vraccia piecate, e co li
capucci tratti. Deh como stavano paurosi! (Hist. Rom. l. ii. c.
20, p. 439.) He saw them, and we see them.]
42 (return) [ The original letter, in which Rienzi justifies his
treatment of the Colonna, (Hocsemius, apud du Cerçeau, p.
222—229,) displays, in genuine colors, the mixture of the knave
and the madman.]
During some weeks they were checked by the memory of their
danger, rather than of their deliverance, till the most powerful
of the Ursini, escaping with the Colonna from the city, erected
at Marino the standard of rebellion. The fortifications of the
castle were instantly restored; the vassals attended their lord;
the outlaws armed against the magistrate; the flocks and herds,
the harvests and vineyards, from Marino to the gates of Rome,
were swept away or destroyed; and the people arraigned Rienzi as
the author of the calamities which his government had taught them
to forget. In the camp, Rienzi appeared to less advantage than in
the rostrum; and he neglected the progress of the rebel barons
till their numbers were strong, and their castles impregnable.
From the pages of Livy he had not imbibed the art, or even the
courage, of a general: an army of twenty thousand Romans returned
without honor or effect from the attack of Marino; and his
vengeance was amused by painting his enemies, their heads
downwards, and drowning two dogs (at least they should have been
bears) as the representatives of the Ursini. The belief of his
incapacity encouraged their operations: they were invited by
their secret adherents; and the barons attempted, with four
thousand foot, and sixteen hundred horse, to enter Rome by force
or surprise. The city was prepared for their reception; the
alarm-bell rung all night; the gates were strictly guarded, or
insolently open; and after some hesitation they sounded a
retreat. The two first divisions had passed along the walls, but
the prospect of a free entrance tempted the headstrong valor of
the nobles in the rear; and after a successful skirmish, they
were overthrown and massacred without quarter by the crowds of
the Roman people. Stephen Colonna the younger, the noble spirit
to whom Petrarch ascribed the restoration of Italy, was preceded
or accompanied in death by his son John, a gallant youth, by his
brother Peter, who might regret the ease and honors of the
church, by a nephew of legitimate birth, and by two bastards of
the Colonna race; and the number of seven, the seven crowns, as
Rienzi styled them, of the Holy Ghost, was completed by the agony
of the deplorable parent, and the veteran chief, who had survived
the hope and fortune of his house. The vision and prophecies of
St. Martin and Pope Boniface had been used by the tribune to
animate his troops: 43 he displayed, at least in the pursuit, the
spirit of a hero; but he forgot the maxims of the ancient Romans,
who abhorred the triumphs of civil war. The conqueror ascended
the Capitol; deposited his crown and sceptre on the altar; and
boasted, with some truth, that he had cut off an ear, which
neither pope nor emperor had been able to amputate. 44 His base
and implacable revenge denied the honors of burial; and the
bodies of the Colonna, which he threatened to expose with those
of the vilest malefactors, were secretly interred by the holy
virgins of their name and family. 45 The people sympathized in
their grief, repented of their own fury, and detested the
indecent joy of Rienzi, who visited the spot where these
illustrious victims had fallen. It was on that fatal spot that he
conferred on his son the honor of knighthood: and the ceremony
was accomplished by a slight blow from each of the horsemen of
the guard, and by a ridiculous and inhuman ablution from a pool
of water, which was yet polluted with patrician blood. 46
43 (return) [ Rienzi, in the above-mentioned letter, ascribes to
St. Martin the tribune, Boniface VIII. the enemy of Colonna,
himself, and the Roman people, the glory of the day, which
Villani likewise (l. 12, c. 104) describes as a regular battle.
The disorderly skirmish, the flight of the Romans, and the
cowardice of Rienzi, are painted in the simple and minute
narrative of Fortifiocca, or the anonymous citizen, (l. i. c.
34—37.)]
44 (return) [ In describing the fall of the Colonna, I speak only
of the family of Stephen the elder, who is often confounded by
the P. du Cerçeau with his son. That family was extinguished, but
the house has been perpetuated in the collateral branches, of
which I have not a very accurate knowledge. Circumspice (says
Petrarch) familiæ tuæ statum, Columniensium _domos_: solito
pauciores habeat columnas. Quid ad rem modo fundamentum stabile,
solidumque permaneat.]
45 (return) [ The convent of St. Silvester was founded, endowed,
and protected by the Colonna cardinals, for the daughters of the
family who embraced a monastic life, and who, in the year 1318,
were twelve in number. The others were allowed to marry with
their kinsmen in the fourth degree, and the dispensation was
justified by the small number and close alliances of the noble
families of Rome, (Mémoires sur Pétrarque, tom. i. p. 110, tom.
ii. p. 401.)]
46 (return) [ Petrarch wrote a stiff and pedantic letter of
consolation, (Fam. l. vii. epist. 13, p. 682, 683.) The friend
was lost in the patriot. Nulla toto orbe principum familia
carior; carior tamen respublica, carior Roma, carior Italia. ——Je
rends graces aux Dieux de n’être pas Romain.]
A short delay would have saved the Colonna, the delay of a single
month, which elapsed between the triumph and the exile of Rienzi.
In the pride of victory, he forfeited what yet remained of his
civil virtues, without acquiring the fame of military prowess. A
free and vigorous opposition was formed in the city; and when the
tribune proposed in the public council 47 to impose a new tax,
and to regulate the government of Perugia, thirty-nine members
voted against his measures; repelled the injurious charge of
treachery and corruption; and urged him to prove, by their
forcible exclusion, that if the populace adhered to his cause, it
was already disclaimed by the most respectable citizens. The pope
and the sacred college had never been dazzled by his specious
professions; they were justly offended by the insolence of his
conduct; a cardinal legate was sent to Italy, and after some
fruitless treaty, and two personal interviews, he fulminated a
bull of excommunication, in which the tribune is degraded from
his office, and branded with the guilt of rebellion, sacrilege,
and heresy. 48 The surviving barons of Rome were now humbled to a
sense of allegiance; their interest and revenge engaged them in
the service of the church; but as the fate of the Colonna was
before their eyes, they abandoned to a private adventurer the
peril and glory of the revolution. John Pepin, count of
Minorbino, 49 in the kingdom of Naples, had been condemned for
his crimes, or his riches, to perpetual imprisonment; and
Petrarch, by soliciting his release, indirectly contributed to
the ruin of his friend. At the head of one hundred and fifty
soldiers, the count of Minorbino introduced himself into Rome;
barricaded the quarter of the Colonna: and found the enterprise
as easy as it had seemed impossible. From the first alarm, the
bell of the Capitol incessantly tolled; but, instead of repairing
to the well-known sound, the people were silent and inactive; and
the pusillanimous Rienzi, deploring their ingratitude with sighs
and tears, abdicated the government and palace of the republic.
47 (return) [ This council and opposition is obscurely mentioned
by Pollistore, a contemporary writer, who has preserved some
curious and original facts, (Rer. Italicarum, tom. xxv. c. 31, p.
798—804.)]
48 (return) [ The briefs and bulls of Clement VI. against Rienzi
are translated by the P. du Cerçeau, (p. 196, 232,) from the
Ecclesiastical Annals of Odericus Raynaldus, (A.D. 1347, No. 15,
17, 21, &c.,) who found them in the archives of the Vatican.]
49 (return) [ Matteo Villani describes the origin, character, and
death of this count of Minorbino, a man da natura inconstante e
senza fede, whose grandfather, a crafty notary, was enriched and
ennobled by the spoils of the Saracens of Nocera, (l. vii. c.
102, 103.) See his imprisonment, and the efforts of Petrarch,
(tom. ii. p. 149—151.)]
Chapter LXX: Final Settlement Of The Ecclesiastical State.—Part
III.
Without drawing his sword, count Pepin restored the aristocracy
and the church; three senators were chosen, and the legate,
assuming the first rank, accepted his two colleagues from the
rival families of Colonna and Ursini. The acts of the tribune
were abolished, his head was proscribed; yet such was the terror
of his name, that the barons hesitated three days before they
would trust themselves in the city, and Rienzi was left above a
month in the castle of St. Angelo, from whence he peaceably
withdrew, after laboring, without effect, to revive the affection
and courage of the Romans. The vision of freedom and empire had
vanished: their fallen spirit would have acquiesced in servitude,
had it been smoothed by tranquillity and order; and it was
scarcely observed, that the new senators derived their authority
from the Apostolic See; that four cardinals were appointed to
reform, with dictatorial power, the state of the republic. Rome
was again agitated by the bloody feuds of the barons, who
detested each other, and despised the commons: their hostile
fortresses, both in town and country, again rose, and were again
demolished: and the peaceful citizens, a flock of sheep, were
devoured, says the Florentine historian, by these rapacious
wolves. But when their pride and avarice had exhausted the
patience of the Romans, a confraternity of the Virgin Mary
protected or avenged the republic: the bell of the Capitol was
again tolled, the nobles in arms trembled in the presence of an
unarmed multitude; and of the two senators, Colonna escaped from
the window of the palace, and Ursini was stoned at the foot of
the altar. The dangerous office of tribune was successively
occupied by two plebeians, Cerroni and Baroncelli. The mildness
of Cerroni was unequal to the times; and after a faint struggle,
he retired with a fair reputation and a decent fortune to the
comforts of rural life. Devoid of eloquence or genius, Baroncelli
was distinguished by a resolute spirit: he spoke the language of
a patriot, and trod in the footsteps of tyrants; his suspicion
was a sentence of death, and his own death was the reward of his
cruelties. Amidst the public misfortunes, the faults of Rienzi
were forgotten; and the Romans sighed for the peace and
prosperity of their good estate. 50
50 (return) [ The troubles of Rome, from the departure to the
return of Rienzi, are related by Matteo Villani (l. ii. c. 47, l.
iii. c. 33, 57, 78) and Thomas Fortifiocca, (l. iii. c. 1—4.) I
have slightly passed over these secondary characters, who
imitated the original tribune.]
After an exile of seven years, the first deliverer was again
restored to his country. In the disguise of a monk or a pilgrim,
he escaped from the castle of St. Angelo, implored the friendship
of the king of Hungary at Naples, tempted the ambition of every
bold adventurer, mingled at Rome with the pilgrims of the
jubilee, lay concealed among the hermits of the Apennine, and
wandered through the cities of Italy, Germany, and Bohemia. His
person was invisible, his name was yet formidable; and the
anxiety of the court of Avignon supposes, and even magnifies, his
personal merit. The emperor Charles the Fourth gave audience to a
stranger, who frankly revealed himself as the tribune of the
republic; and astonished an assembly of ambassadors and princes,
by the eloquence of a patriot and the visions of a prophet, the
downfall of tyranny and the kingdom of the Holy Ghost. 51
Whatever had been his hopes, Rienzi found himself a captive; but
he supported a character of independence and dignity, and obeyed,
as his own choice, the irresistible summons of the supreme
pontiff. The zeal of Petrarch, which had been cooled by the
unworthy conduct, was rekindled by the sufferings and the
presence, of his friend; and he boldly complains of the times, in
which the savior of Rome was delivered by her emperor into the
hands of her bishop. Rienzi was transported slowly, but in safe
custody, from Prague to Avignon: his entrance into the city was
that of a malefactor; in his prison he was chained by the leg;
and four cardinals were named to inquire into the crimes of
heresy and rebellion. But his trial and condemnation would have
involved some questions, which it was more prudent to leave under
the veil of mystery: the temporal supremacy of the popes; the
duty of residence; the civil and ecclesiastical privileges of the
clergy and people of Rome. The reigning pontiff well deserved the
appellation of _Clement_: the strange vicissitudes and
magnanimous spirit of the captive excited his pity and esteem;
and Petrarch believes that he respected in the hero the name and
sacred character of a poet. 52 Rienzi was indulged with an easy
confinement and the use of books; and in the assiduous study of
Livy and the Bible, he sought the cause and the consolation of
his misfortunes.
51 (return) [ These visions, of which the friends and enemies of
Rienzi seem alike ignorant, are surely magnified by the zeal of
Pollistore, a Dominican inquisitor, (Rer. Ital. tom. xxv. c. 36,
p. 819.) Had the tribune taught, that Christ was succeeded by the
Holy Ghost, that the tyranny of the pope would be abolished, he
might have been convicted of heresy and treason, without
offending the Roman people. * Note: So far from having magnified
these visions, Pollistore is more than confirmed by the documents
published by Papencordt. The adoption of all the wild doctrines
of the Fratricelli, the Spirituals, in which, for the time at
least, Rienzi appears to have been in earnest; his magnificent
offers to the emperor, and the whole history of his life, from
his first escape from Rome to his imprisonment at Avignon, are
among the most curious chapters of his eventful life.—M. 1845.]
52 (return) [ The astonishment, the envy almost, of Petrarch is a
proof, if not of the truth of this incredible fact, at least of
his own veracity. The abbé de Sade (Mémoires, tom. iii. p. 242)
quotes the vith epistle of the xiiith book of Petrarch, but it is
of the royal MS., which he consulted, and not of the ordinary
Basil edition, (p. 920.)]
The succeeding pontificate of Innocent the Sixth opened a new
prospect of his deliverance and restoration; and the court of
Avignon was persuaded, that the successful rebel could alone
appease and reform the anarchy of the metropolis. After a solemn
profession of fidelity, the Roman tribune was sent into Italy,
with the title of senator; but the death of Baroncelli appeared
to supersede the use of his mission; and the legate, Cardinal
Albornoz, 53 a consummate statesman, allowed him with reluctance,
and without aid, to undertake the perilous experiment. His first
reception was equal to his wishes: the day of his entrance was a
public festival; and his eloquence and authority revived the laws
of the good estate. But this momentary sunshine was soon clouded
by his own vices and those of the people: in the Capitol, he
might often regret the prison of Avignon; and after a second
administration of four months, Rienzi was massacred in a tumult
which had been fomented by the Roman barons. In the society of
the Germans and Bohemians, he is said to have contracted the
habits of intemperance and cruelty: adversity had chilled his
enthusiasm, without fortifying his reason or virtue; and that
youthful hope, that lively assurance, which is the pledge of
success, was now succeeded by the cold impotence of distrust and
despair. The tribune had reigned with absolute dominion, by the
choice, and in the hearts, of the Romans: the senator was the
servile minister of a foreign court; and while he was suspected
by the people, he was abandoned by the prince. The legate
Albornoz, who seemed desirous of his ruin, inflexibly refused all
supplies of men and money; a faithful subject could no longer
presume to touch the revenues of the apostolical chamber; and the
first idea of a tax was the signal of clamor and sedition. Even
his justice was tainted with the guilt or reproach of selfish
cruelty: the most virtuous citizen of Rome was sacrificed to his
jealousy; and in the execution of a public robber, from whose
purse he had been assisted, the magistrate too much forgot, or
too much remembered, the obligations of the debtor. 54 A civil
war exhausted his treasures, and the patience of the city: the
Colonna maintained their hostile station at Palestrina; and his
mercenaries soon despised a leader whose ignorance and fear were
envious of all subordinate merit. In the death, as in the life,
of Rienzi, the hero and the coward were strangely mingled. When
the Capitol was invested by a furious multitude, when he was
basely deserted by his civil and military servants, the intrepid
senator, waving the banner of liberty, presented himself on the
balcony, addressed his eloquence to the various passions of the
Romans, and labored to persuade them, that in the same cause
himself and the republic must either stand or fall. His oration
was interrupted by a volley of imprecations and stones; and after
an arrow had transpierced his hand, he sunk into abject despair,
and fled weeping to the inner chambers, from whence he was let
down by a sheet before the windows of the prison. Destitute of
aid or hope, he was besieged till the evening: the doors of the
Capitol were destroyed with axes and fire; and while the senator
attempted to escape in a plebeian habit, he was discovered and
dragged to the platform of the palace, the fatal scene of his
judgments and executions. A whole hour, without voice or motion,
he stood amidst the multitude half naked and half dead: their
rage was hushed into curiosity and wonder: the last feelings of
reverence and compassion yet struggled in his favor; and they
might have prevailed, if a bold assassin had not plunged a dagger
in his breast. He fell senseless with the first stroke: the
impotent revenge of his enemies inflicted a thousand wounds: and
the senator’s body was abandoned to the dogs, to the Jews, and to
the flames. Posterity will compare the virtues and failings of
this extraordinary man; but in a long period of anarchy and
servitude, the name of Rienzi has often been celebrated as the
deliverer of his country, and the last of the Roman patriots. 55
53 (return) [ Ægidius, or Giles Albornoz, a noble Spaniard,
archbishop of Toledo, and cardinal legate in Italy, (A.D.
1353—1367,) restored, by his arms and counsels, the temporal
dominion of the popes. His life has been separately written by
Sepulveda; but Dryden could not reasonably suppose, that his
name, or that of Wolsey, had reached the ears of the Mufti in Don
Sebastian.]
54 (return) [ From Matteo Villani and Fortifiocca, the P. du
Cerçeau (p. 344—394) has extracted the life and death of the
chevalier Montreal, the life of a robber and the death of a hero.
At the head of a free company, the first that desolated Italy, he
became rich and formidable be had money in all the banks,—60,000
ducats in Padua alone.]
55 (return) [ The exile, second government, and death of Rienzi,
are minutely related by the anonymous Roman, who appears neither
his friend nor his enemy, (l. iii. c. 12—25.) Petrarch, who loved
the _tribune_, was indifferent to the fate of the _senator_.]
The first and most generous wish of Petrarch was the restoration
of a free republic; but after the exile and death of his plebeian
hero, he turned his eyes from the tribune, to the king, of the
Romans. The Capitol was yet stained with the blood of Rienzi,
when Charles the Fourth descended from the Alps to obtain the
Italian and Imperial crowns. In his passage through Milan he
received the visit, and repaid the flattery, of the
poet-laureate; accepted a medal of Augustus; and promised,
without a smile, to imitate the founder of the Roman monarchy. A
false application of the name and maxims of antiquity was the
source of the hopes and disappointments of Petrarch; yet he could
not overlook the difference of times and characters; the
immeasurable distance between the first Cæsars and a Bohemian
prince, who by the favor of the clergy had been elected the
titular head of the German aristocracy. Instead of restoring to
Rome her glory and her provinces, he had bound himself by a
secret treaty with the pope, to evacuate the city on the day of
his coronation; and his shameful retreat was pursued by the
reproaches of the patriot bard. 56
56 (return) [ The hopes and the disappointment of Petrarch are
agreeably described in his own words by the French biographer,
(Mémoires, tom. iii. p. 375—413;) but the deep, though secret,
wound was the coronation of Zanubi, the poet-laureate, by Charles
IV.]
After the loss of liberty and empire, his third and more humble
wish was to reconcile the shepherd with his flock; to recall the
Roman bishop to his ancient and peculiar diocese. In the fervor
of youth, with the authority of age, Petrarch addressed his
exhortations to five successive popes, and his eloquence was
always inspired by the enthusiasm of sentiment and the freedom of
language. 57 The son of a citizen of Florence invariably
preferred the country of his birth to that of his education; and
Italy, in his eyes, was the queen and garden of the world. Amidst
her domestic factions, she was doubtless superior to France both
in art and science, in wealth and politeness; but the difference
could scarcely support the epithet of barbarous, which he
promiscuously bestows on the countries beyond the Alps. Avignon,
the mystic Babylon, the sink of vice and corruption, was the
object of his hatred and contempt; but he forgets that her
scandalous vices were not the growth of the soil, and that in
every residence they would adhere to the power and luxury of the
papal court. He confesses that the successor of St. Peter is the
bishop of the universal church; yet it was not on the banks of
the Rhône, but of the Tyber, that the apostle had fixed his
everlasting throne; and while every city in the Christian world
was blessed with a bishop, the metropolis alone was desolate and
forlorn. Since the removal of the Holy See, the sacred buildings
of the Lateran and the Vatican, their altars and their saints,
were left in a state of poverty and decay; and Rome was often
painted under the image of a disconsolate matron, as if the
wandering husband could be reclaimed by the homely portrait of
the age and infirmities of his weeping spouse. 58 But the cloud
which hung over the seven hills would be dispelled by the
presence of their lawful sovereign: eternal fame, the prosperity
of Rome, and the peace of Italy, would be the recompense of the
pope who should dare to embrace this generous resolution. Of the
five whom Petrarch exhorted, the three first, John the
Twenty-second, Benedict the Twelfth, and Clement the Sixth, were
importuned or amused by the boldness of the orator; but the
memorable change which had been attempted by Urban the Fifth was
finally accomplished by Gregory the Eleventh. The execution of
their design was opposed by weighty and almost insuperable
obstacles. A king of France, who has deserved the epithet of
wise, was unwilling to release them from a local dependence: the
cardinals, for the most part his subjects, were attached to the
language, manners, and climate of Avignon; to their stately
palaces; above all, to the wines of Burgundy. In their eyes,
Italy was foreign or hostile; and they reluctantly embarked at
Marseilles, as if they had been sold or banished into the land of
the Saracens. Urban the Fifth resided three years in the Vatican
with safety and honor: his sanctity was protected by a guard of
two thousand horse; and the king of Cyprus, the queen of Naples,
and the emperors of the East and West, devoutly saluted their
common father in the chair of St. Peter. But the joy of Petrarch
and the Italians was soon turned into grief and indignation. Some
reasons of public or private moment, his own impatience or the
prayers of the cardinals, recalled Urban to France; and the
approaching election was saved from the tyrannic patriotism of
the Romans. The powers of heaven were interested in their cause:
Bridget of Sweden, a saint and pilgrim, disapproved the return,
and foretold the death, of Urban the Fifth: the migration of
Gregory the Eleventh was encouraged by St. Catharine of Sienna,
the spouse of Christ and ambassadress of the Florentines; and the
popes themselves, the great masters of human credulity, appear to
have listened to these visionary females. 59 Yet those celestial
admonitions were supported by some arguments of temporal policy.
The residents of Avignon had been invaded by hostile violence: at
the head of thirty thousand robbers, a hero had extorted ransom
and absolution from the vicar of Christ and the sacred college;
and the maxim of the French warriors, to spare the people and
plunder the church, was a new heresy of the most dangerous
import. 60 While the pope was driven from Avignon, he was
strenuously invited to Rome. The senate and people acknowledged
him as their lawful sovereign, and laid at his feet the keys of
the gates, the bridges, and the fortresses; of the quarter at
least beyond the Tyber. 61 But this loyal offer was accompanied
by a declaration, that they could no longer suffer the scandal
and calamity of his absence; and that his obstinacy would finally
provoke them to revive and assert the primitive right of
election. The abbot of Mount Cassin had been consulted, whether
he would accept the triple crown 62 from the clergy and people:
“I am a citizen of Rome,” 63 replied that venerable ecclesiastic,
“and my first law is, the voice of my country.” 64
57 (return) [ See, in his accurate and amusing biographer, the
application of Petrarch and Rome to Benedict XII. in the year
1334, (Mémoires, tom. i. p. 261—265,) to Clement VI. in 1342,
(tom. ii. p. 45—47,) and to Urban V. in 1366, (tom. iii. p.
677—691:) his praise (p. 711—715) and excuse (p. 771) of the last
of these pontiffs. His angry controversy on the respective merits
of France and Italy may be found, Opp. p. 1068—1085.]
58 (return) [
Squalida sed quoniam facies, neglectaque cultû Cæsaries;
multisque malis lassata senectus Eripuit solitam
effigiem: vetus accipe nomen; Roma vocor. (Carm. l. 2,
p. 77.)
He spins this allegory beyond all measure or patience. The
Epistles to Urban V in prose are more simple and persuasive,
(Senilium, l. vii. p. 811—827 l. ix. epist. i. p. 844—854.)]
59 (return) [ I have not leisure to expatiate on the legends of
St. Bridget or St. Catharine, the last of which might furnish
some amusing stories. Their effect on the mind of Gregory XI. is
attested by the last solemn words of the dying pope, who
admonished the assistants, ut caverent ab hominibus, sive viris,
sive mulieribus, sub specie religionis loquentibus visiones sui
capitis, quia per tales ipse seductus, &c., (Baluz. Not ad Vit.
Pap. Avenionensium, tom. i. p. 1224.)]
60 (return) [ This predatory expedition is related by Froissard,
(Chronique, tom. i. p. 230,) and in the life of Du Guesclin,
(Collection Générale des Mémoires Historiques, tom. iv. c. 16, p.
107—113.) As early as the year 1361, the court of Avignon had
been molested by similar freebooters, who afterwards passed the
Alps, (Mémoires sur Pétrarque, tom. iii. p. 563—569.)]
61 (return) [ Fleury alleges, from the annals of Odericus
Raynaldus, the original treaty which was signed the 21st of
December, 1376, between Gregory XI. and the Romans, (Hist.
Ecclés. tom. xx. p. 275.)]