So in Wood’s ©Ath. Oxon.©, ed. Bliss, iii. 274.
24. ¬Twittee¬, Thomas. AD | CLERVM | PRO | FORMA CONCIO | HABITA IN
TEMPLO | BEATÆ MARIÆ _OXON_: | MARTIJ 13. 1634. | [_line_] | PER THO_:_
TWITTEE SANCTÆ | Theologiæ _Bac. è Coll. Oriell._ | [_line, motto._] |
Impr. 157: 1640: sm. 4^o: pp. [4] + 24: p. 11 beg. _men hî verè_:
Great Primer Roman. Contents:—p. (1) title, within double lines: (3)
dedication to dr. John Tolson provost of Oriel: 1–24, the sermon, on 1
Pet. iii. 8.
See Wood’s ©Fasti Oxon.©, ed. Bliss, i. 469. The dedication is of the
modern kind, not an epistle dedicatory, and the printing is unusual,
the first words of a paragraph being generally projections to the
left, instead of indented.
25. ¬Z[ouche]¬, R[ichard]. DESCRIPTIO | JuRIS & JuDICII | MILITARIS |
_AD QVAM LEGES QUÆ_ | Rem Militarem, & Ordinem | _Personarum_. | NEC NON
| JuRIS & JuDICII | MARITIMI | AD QuAM QuÆ NAVI-|_GATIONEM ET_ |
Negotiationem Maritimam | _respiciunt, referuntur_. | [_line_] | Autore
R. Z. P. R. _Oxoniæ_. | [_line._]
Impr. 157: 1640: sm. 4^o: pp. [8] + 36 + [4] + 40 + [4]: pp. 11 beg.
_meris sunt_, and _quæsitum est_: Pica Roman. Contents:—p. (3) title,
within double lines: (5–6) “Ad Lectorem”, unsigned, but “Datum ex Aula
Alb. Prid. Calend. April. 1640”: (7–8) heads of chapters in division
1: 1–36, the military division, in two parts: (1) a title, within
double lines: “DESCRIPTIO | JuRIS & JuDICII | MARITIMI | [&c., exactly
as the main title, to its end, with woodcut and impr. 157: (3–4) heads
of chapters in division 2: 1–40, “De jure maritimo & de jure nautico”
in two parts: (1) “Errata”.
See Wood’s ©Ath. Oxon.©, ed. Bliss, iii. 511. The signatures establish
a connexion between the two divisions.
26. ——. “_Descr. Juris & Judicii sacri; ad quam Leges, quæ ad Religionem
& piam Causam respiciunt, referuntur._ Oxon. 1640. qu.”
So in Wood’s ©Ath. Oxon.©, ed. Bliss, iii. 511, where it is stated
that the De Jure Sacro, Militari and Maritimo, were issued together.
In the Leyden reprint of 1652 the De jure sacro is rather shorter than
the other two. It does not seem to have found its way into the Oxford
or London libraries which have published their catalogues.
Periodical.
The ©Quaestiones in Vesperiis© and ©Quaestiones in Comitiis© (see Andrew
Clark’s ©Register of the University of Oxford©, vol. ii. pt. i. [1887],
p. 169) were often printed.
1602. The earliest I have seen are the theological “Quæstiones
(Christo propitio) in Vesperijs discutiendæ, _Iul._ 10. 1602,”
followed by some belonging to the Comitia, and some Law _quaestiones_
belonging to both, and by a specimen of dr. John King’s treatment of
his three _quaestiones_, in Latin verse: the whole forming a small
sheet of 16 pages, with the last five blank.
1605. The ©Quaestiones ... in Comitiis ... coram ... Rege ... Aug....
1605© were printed in folio sheet form, as was invariably the case in
later years, occupying in this year four pages. Whether this issue was
exceptional or not, is not clear.
1608. In this year at latest begins the series of ordinary folio
sheets of _quaestiones_: of which examples have been seen for the
years 1608, 1614, 1618, 1619, 1622, 1627, 1628, 1629, 1632, 1634,
1635, 1639, 1640, and intermittently until at least 1693.
SUPPLEMENT.
ADDITIONS AND CORRECTIONS IN CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER.
“1468”–86/7.
Pp. 1–4. See pp. 237–62. (App. A).
1483.
P. 3. For the ¬Augustine¬ see p. 259.
P. 3. _For_ 3. *¬Logic¬ _read_ 3. *†¬Logic¬.
P. 3. _For_ 4. *¬Lyndewoode¬ _read_ 4. *†¬Lyndewoode¬.
1485.
P. 4. ¬Alexander¬, l. 3.
_For_ c^2-c^3 _read_ c2, c3.
1486.
P. 4. ¬Mirk¬, last line.
The first two leaves are in the Lambeth copy.
1517–19.
Pp. 5–7. See pp. 263–65. (App. B).
1518.
P. 7. ¬Whittington¬, l. 3.
_For_ protouatis _read_ prothouatis. Eleven copies are now known.