PART VIII

GOETHE AND FAUST

I

GOETHE’S YOUTH

Goethe’s youth—Pessimism of youth—Werther—Tendency to

suicide—Work and love—Goethe’s conception of life in

his maturity

There can be drawn from analysis of the lives of great men information

that is very important in the study of the constitution of man. I have

chosen Goethe for several reasons. He was a man of genius distinguished

by the comprehensive character of his ability. He was a poet and

dramatist of the highest rank, his mind was stored with the most

varied knowledge, and he contributed to the advancement of natural

science. As minister of state and as the director of a theatre, he was

occupied with practical affairs. He reached the age of eighty-three

years, and he passed through the phases of life in relatively normal

circumstances; in his many writings there are most valuable facts which

throw a keen light on his life and nature. The Goethe cult in Germany

has brought about the existence of fuller biographical details than

exist regarding any other great man. He aspired to lead “the higher

life,” and, throughout his existence, he occupied himself with the most

serious problems of humanity.

It is not surprising that Goethe became a subject of investigation for

me, but as the main facts as to his history are widely known I need not

elaborate them here.

Goethe was reared in circumstances that were favourable in every

respect, and from his earliest years showed remarkable traits. As his

memory was good and his imagination vast, the study of ancient and

modern languages and the routine curriculum of a classical education

were little more than an amusement to him. The rich library of his

father placed all sorts of books at his disposal, and whilst he was

still young he devoted himself to reading with the enthusiasm and

passion that were the chief qualities of his character. When he was

fifteen years old he began to write verses, although he was still

unconscious of his destiny as a poet. He intended to be a learned man,

and looked forward to the career of a professor.

At the age of sixteen, he entered the University of Leipzig with the

intention of studying natural science seriously. Law and philosophy

interested him but little; he turned to natural science and medicine,

although his actual study was rather superficial. His disposition was

lively and restless; he made many friends, frequented the theatre

and plunged into all kinds of gaiety. Extracts from letters he wrote

during this period show the kind of life he led. When he was a student,

eighteen years old, he wrote to a friend, “And so good-night; I am

drunk as a hog.” A month later, to the same friend, he summed up his

life as a “delirium in the arms of Jetty.”

He graduated in law at Strassburg, and became a barrister, but

realising that such a career was unsuitable, he became a man of

letters, encouraged by the success of his first literary efforts.

From the point of view of a writer, he sought all kinds of experiences.

He devoted himself to literature and science, including even the

occult sciences, and frequented the theatre and society. He was

specially attracted by the imaginative side and gave little thought to

the problems of science. “I must have movement,” he wrote in one of his

note-books.

When he was young, his temper was violent and he fell into fits of

passionate rage. His contemporaries have related that when he was in

such a condition he would destroy the illustrations and tear up the

books on his work-table. These experiences have been vividly described

in his famous romance, _The Sorrows of Werther_. I shall give a few

extracts to show the exact state of mind of the young pessimist. “It is

the fate of some men not to be understood.” “Human life is a dream; I

am not the first to say that, but the idea haunts me. When I reflect on

the narrow limits which circumscribe the powers of man, his activities

and intelligence; when I see how we exhaust our forces in satisfying

our wants and that these wants are for no more than the prolongation

of a miserable existence; that our acquiescence in so much is merely

resignation engendered by dreams, like that of a prisoner who has

covered the walls of his cell with pictures and new landscapes; such

things, my friend, plunge me into silence.” “Our learned teachers

all agree that children do not know why they have desires; but that

grown men should move on the earth like children, and, like these, be

ignorant whence they have come and whither they go, like these strive

little for real things, but be ruled by cakes and sweets and rods; no

one will believe such things, though their truth is patent. I admit

readily (for I know what you will say) that they are the happiest men

who live from day to day like children, who play with their dolls,

dress them and undress them, who reverence the cupboard where mamma

keeps the gingerbread, and who, when they have got what they wish,

cry, with their mouths full, ‘How happy we are!’”

Werther proclaimed his pessimism before his romance with Charlotte, and

it was his view of life that made his love-affair turn out unhappily.

But the fame of Goethe’s _Werther_ was due, not to the tragic fate

of the young lover, but to the general views which were in harmony

with the conception of the world held by the best minds of the time.

Byronism was born before Byron.

_Werther_ affords a good illustration of the disharmonies in the

development of man’s psychical nature. Inclination and desires develop

extremely strongly and before will. Just as in the development of

the reproductive functions, as I showed in _The Nature of Man_, the

different factors develop unequally and unharmoniously, so there is

inequality and disharmony in the order of the appearance of the higher

psychical faculties. Sexual appreciation and a vague attraction to

the other sex appear at a time when there can be no possibility of

the normal physical side of sex, with the result that many evils come

about in the long period of youth. The precocious development of

sensibility brings about a kind of diffused hyperæsthesia which may

lead to trouble. The infant wishes to lay hold of everything he sees

before him; he stretches out his arms to grasp the moon and suffers

from his inability to gratify his desires. In youth there is still

well-marked disharmony. Young people cannot realise the true relations

of things, and formulate their desires before they understand that

their will-power is not strong enough to gratify them, as will is the

latest of the human powers to develop.

Werther fell in love with a kindred spirit and gave way to his passion

without consideration of the difficulties, Charlotte being already

betrothed to another. This is the plot of the tragedy of the young

man, who committed suicide, having given way to pessimism. He had not

the will-power to conquer his sentiments and so fell into a state of

lassitude, until, weary of life, he could see no other end than to blow

out his brains.

I need not linger over the last phase of the story of Werther, for it

is the character of Goethe himself that is of interest. Goethe was

able to subdue his passion for Lotte, and, after many amorous woes,

consoled himself with another woman. Notwithstanding this difference,

it is certain that in _Werther_, Goethe was telling part of the story

of his own youth. Goethe himself is a witness to this, for in a letter

to Kestner he wrote that “he was at work on the artistic reproduction

of his own case.” The letter was written in July, 1773, whilst Goethe,

then a writer twenty-four years old, was relating the sorrows of young

Werther.

The general tendency of _Werther_ has been described excellently

by Carlyle.[190] “_Werther_,” he wrote, “is but the cry of that

dim, rooted pain, under which all thoughtful men of a certain age

were languishing; it paints the misery, it passionately utters the

complaint; and heart and voice, all over Europe, loudly and at once

responded to it.” Werther was “the first thrilling peal of that

impassioned dirge which, in country after country, men’s ears have

listened to, till they were deaf to all else.”

In the pessimistic period of his life, Goethe often cherished the idea

of suicide. In his biography he relates that at this time he used to

have, by his bedside, a poisoned dagger, and that he had repeatedly

tried to plunge it in his bosom. Of these times he wrote to his friend

Zelter[191]—“I know what it has cost me in effort to resist the waves

of death.” The suicide which was the subject of the end of his romance

made a deep impression upon him. Although he overcame his passion

for Charlotte, his view of life remained tinged with pessimism for

many years; in a note-book of 1773, for instance, he wrote “I am not

made for this world.”[192] These words are the more striking as they

date from a period when exact ideas regarding the adaptation of the

organism and the character to the environment did not exist. Goethe,

with his too delicate sensibility, felt himself out of harmony with his

environment.

It is very interesting to trace Goethe’s subsequent development and

the transformation of a youthful pessimist into a convinced optimist.

Goethe found a remedy for his crises of grief in work, poetical

creation and love. He declared that the mere describing his woes on

paper brought assuagement. The tears that they shed console women and

children; and the poetry in which he expresses his suffering consoles

the poet. Goethe’s romance with Charlotte was not quite at an end when

he found himself ready to love her sister Helen. He wrote to Kestner in

December, 1772:—“I was about to ask you if Helen had arrived, when I

got the letter telling me of her return.” “To judge from her portrait

she must be charming, even more charming than Charlotte. Well, I am

free and I am thirsting for love.” “I am here at Frankfort again with

new plans and new dreams, and all will be well if I find someone to

love.” Soon afterwards, in another letter to Kestner, he wrote:—“Tell

Charlotte that I have found here a girl whom I love with all my heart;

if I wanted to marry, I should choose her before anyone else.”

As he had not yet realised his true vocation, Goethe became a court

minister at Weimar. He devoted himself to his duties with an

enthusiasm that carried him far beyond the usual affairs of state.

He wished to deepen his knowledge of such administrative problems as

the construction of roads and the management of mines, and he studied

geology and mineralogy with a real zest. Forest administration and

agriculture led him seriously into botany, and as he had the direction

of a school of design, he thought it necessary to learn anatomy.

Such varied work gave him a real taste for science. It was no longer

the superficial interest that characterised his work at Leipzig and

Strassburg but a true devotion which led him to important discoveries,

some of which have become classic.

Even such varied occupations did not absorb his prodigious genius. In

his leisure he wrote poetry and prose. Engrossed in so much work, he

was happy. His discovery of the human intermaxillary bone suffused him

with joy. His intense activity was strengthened by his love for Madame

von Stein, a love that he declared was “a life-belt supporting him in

the sea.” A few hours with her in the evenings set free his soul.

The powerful influence of love on the life of Goethe was specially

prominent in this period when he was passing from pessimistic youth to

optimistic maturity. Being forced to separate from Madame von Stein,

he gave way to grief that plunged him again in the worst hours of his

life. At the age of thirty-seven he fell back into a crisis like that

of the days of _Werther_. “I have discovered,” he said in 1786, “that

the author of _Werther_ would have done well to blow out his brains

when he had finished his work.” Soon afterwards he wrote that “death

would have been better than the last years of his life.”

This relapse into pessimism was shorter and less acute than his first

experience. He began to find that frequently his delight in existence

and sense of life were proved by his fear of death. When he was little

more than thirty years old, he began to take precautions against the

chance of his death. He wrote to Lavater:—“I have no time to lose; I

am already getting on in years, and it may be that fate will destroy

me in the midst of my life.” On all sides his wish to live and his

shrinking from death reveal themselves. It was at this time, a few

days after his thirty-first birthday, that he wrote those famous

lines, counted amongst the finest of his poetry, on the summit of

the Gickelhahn, on the wall of a small room, and which end with the

presentiment of his own death, “Before long, you also will be at rest.”

The crisis through which he passed at the age of thirty-seven, as the

immediate result of his separation from Madame von Stein, but perhaps

also partly due to brain fatigue, brought about his sudden departure

from Weimar and his long sojourn in Italy. There he came to life again,

and everything interested him, archæology, art and nature. The joy of

life came back to him, and he soon consoled himself for the lost love

of the blue-stocking Baroness in the arms of a pretty, blue-eyed girl

of Milan. This girl, whose name was Maddalena Riggi, like Charlotte,

was already betrothed, a circumstance, however, that had a different

result. Even after she had given up the man to whom she had been

engaged, Goethe avoided any permanent bond and soon abandoned her

definitely. He chose to associate with Faustine, another Italian girl,

with whom he lived during the last period of his stay at Rome. This

affair, which was less ideal and much simpler than his love for Madame

von Stein, he has described in his _Roman Elegies_, which throw a vivid

light on his temperament. I shall give some characteristic extracts.

“A sacred enthusiasm inspires me on this classic soil; the old world

and the world around me raise their voices and draw me to them.

Here I follow the ideas and turn over the pages of the ancient

writers, giving myself no rest whilst day lasts and ever reaching new

delights. By night love calls me to other cares; and if I am only half

a philosopher, I am twice happy. But may I not say that I am also

learning when my eye follows the contours of a loving breast, when with

my hand I trace the lines of her form? It is then that I understand

marble, I think and compare, I see with an eye that touches and touch

with a hand that sees.” “Often I have made verses in her arms; often

my playful finger has softly beaten out my hexameters on her back. As

she breathes in her sweet sleep, her breath burns me to my innermost

soul.”[193]

His stay in Italy brought Goethe definitely to maturity. On this

important stage in his life let us hear his biographer, Bielschowsky.

“The voyage to Italy made a new man of him. His sickliness and

nervousness disappeared. The melancholy which led him to think of early

death and made him regard death as better than the former conditions

of his life was replaced by a sublime serenity and joy in living. The

taciturn and preoccupied man who in no society abandoned his grave

thoughts had become happy as a child” (vol. i, p. 412). “From this

time on, in calm and enviable security, he passed through the cycle of

life which seemed so mysterious to others. Goethe became the serene

Olympian, the wonder of posterity, whilst many of his contemporaries no

longer saw in him the passionate pilgrim” (_ibid._, p. 417).

It was after reaching the age of forty years that Goethe entered on the

optimistic phase of his life.

II

GOETHE AND OPTIMISM

Goethe’s optimistic period—His mode of life

in that period—Influence of love in artistic

production—Inclinations towards the arts must be

regarded as secondary sexual characters—Senile love of

Goethe—Relation between genius and the sexual activities

The moral equilibrium of the great writer was not established once

for all. In the course of his life, Goethe had several relapses into

pessimism which, however, were ephemeral, and after which he became a

man as complete and harmonious as was possible in the circumstances of

his life. He reached a serene old age, and his activity did not relax

until after his eightieth year, when he died.

As I have already said, Goethe realised the value of life in good

time. Having become an optimist, he experienced the joy of existence

and coveted as much of it as possible. When he was an old man, he

declared that life, like the Sibylline books, became more valuable

the fewer of them were left. There appeared in him a normal phase of

human nature. The conditions under which he lived, however, were far

from ideal. His health was indifferent. In his youth he suffered from

severe hæmorrhage, probably tuberculous, and throughout his life he was

subject to various more or less serious maladies, such as gout, colic,

nephritis, and intestinal troubles. His habits were unwholesome. He

was brought up in a region of vineyards, and in his youth he acquired

the habit of drinking wine in quantities certainly harmful. This he

himself realised, and when he was thirty-one years old, after he had

acquired the instinct of life, he gave it serious attention. “I wish I

could abstain from wine,” he wrote in his note-book. Some weeks later

he wrote, “I now drink almost no wine.”[194]

But he had not the strength of character to remain temperate, and soon

after his decision, he had fits of bleeding at the nose, which he

attributed to “having taken some glasses of wine.”[195] To his last

day, he took wine regularly, and sometimes to excess. J. H. Wolff,

who dined with him at Weimar, when he was in his eightieth year, was

surprised by his appetite and by the quantity of wine he drank. “In

addition to other food, he ate an enormous portion of roast goose, and

drank a bottle of red wine.”[196] In Eckermann’s interesting narrative

of the last ten years of Goethe’s life (1822-1832) there is repeated

mention of wine. Goethe seized every occasion to drink it. Sometimes

it was the visit of a stranger, sometimes a present of some famous

vintage. It was said that he drank from one to two bottles of wine

daily (Moebius). None the less, he was convinced that wine was not good

for intellectual work. He had remarked that when his friend Schiller

had drunk more than usual, to increase his strength and stimulate his

literary activity, the result was deplorable. He said to Eckermann

(March 11, 1828), “He will ruin his health and will spoil his work.

That is why he has made the faults the critics have pointed out.” In

another conversation (March 11, 1828) he stated that what was written

under the influence of wine was abnormal and forced, and ought to be

deleted.

Love was the great stimulus of Goethe’s genius. The love affairs,

the histories of which fill his biography, are well known. Many have

been shocked by them; others have tried to justify them. It has been

suggested that his disposition made it necessary for him to impart his

ideas and obtain sympathy for them, and that his love for women was the

expression of a purely artistic feeling and had nothing in common with

the ordinary passion.

The truth is that artistic genius and perhaps all kinds of genius are

closely associated with sexual activity. I agree with the proposition

formulated by Dr. Moebius[197] that “artistic proclivities are probably

to be regarded as secondary sexual characters.” Just as the beard

and some other male characters are developed as means of attracting

the female sex, so also bodily strength, strong voice and many of

the talents must be regarded as due to the need to fulfil the sexual

relations. In primitive conditions woman worked more than man; man’s

superior force served him principally in fighting with other males, the

object of the combats usually being possession of a woman. Just as a

victorious combatant covets the presence of a woman as witness of his

prowess, so an orator speaks better in the presence of a woman to whom

he is devoted. Singers and poets are stimulated in their arts by the

love they awaken. Poetic genius is intimately associated with sexual

power and castration inhibits it. Just as castrated animals retain

their physical strength, but become changed in character, losing in

particular their combative nature, so a man of genius loses much of

his quality with the sexual function. Amongst the eunuchs on record,

Abelard is the only poet, but Abelard was forty years old when he

ceased to be a man, and at the same time he ceased to be a poet. Many

singers have been eunuchs, but they have been merely executants, and

have taken no part in musical creation. Some musical composers have

been eunuchs, but these were of mediocre ability and their names have

been forgotten. When castration has taken place at an early age, it

has a much more powerful influence in modifying the secondary sexual

characters.

From the point of view of a naturalist, I cannot agree with the

moralists who have blamed Goethe for his sexuality, nor do I share the

views of those defenders of him who have wished to deny the facts or to

explain them away by the suggestion that they did not relate to sexual

love.

Extracts from the _Roman Elegies_ show quite clearly what was the

nature of Goethe’s love affairs. His feelings towards the Baroness von

Stein have been taken as revealing merely idealistic love. But some of

his letters to her are clear evidence that their relations were erotic

(Moebius, _Goethe_, vol. ii, p. 89). The love which he bore for Minna

Herzlieb, the girl who inspired him to write _Elective Affinities_

(_Wahlverwandschaften_), has been described by Goethe himself in a poem

so crudely erotic that it has been impossible to publish it (Lewes,

vol. ii, p. 314).

A fact to which I specially desire to call attention is that Goethe’s

amorous temperament survived until the end of his life, and all the

world has been astonished by the vigour of his poetic genius in extreme

old age.

Goethe has been the subject of derision because at the age of

seventy-four years he fell deeply in love with Ulrique de Lewetzow, who

was quite a young girl. This incident, however, merits close attention

as it is a typical case of senile love in a man of genius.

Whilst he was at Carlsbad, Goethe became acquainted with a pretty girl

seventeen years old, with beautiful blue eyes, brown hair, and of an

ardent, good-humoured and happy disposition. In the first two seasons

nothing in particular happened. But in the third summer, at Marienbad,

Goethe became passionately enamoured of Ulrique, who was then nineteen

years old and in the full bloom of her young womanhood. His love made

him young again; he passed long hours with her and took to dancing with

her. “I am quite certain,” he wrote to his son, “that it is many years

since I have enjoyed such health of body and mind” (Aug. 30, 1823). His

passion became so serious that the Grand Duke of Saxe-Weimar, on behalf

of his friend, made a formal proposal of marriage for Mademoiselle de

Lewetzow. The mother gave an evasive answer, and the matter rested

in suspense for long, and ended in a refusal. Goethe withdrew to his

family, but encountered there strong opposition to his project of

marriage.

This misadventure troubled the old poet so seriously that he fell ill.

He suffered from pain in the region of the heart and from profound

mental disturbance. He complained to Eckermann “that he could do

nothing, that he could get to work on nothing, and that his mind had

lost its power.” “I can no longer work,” he said. “I cannot even read,

and it is only in rare and fortunate moments that I can think, feeling

myself partially soothed” (Eckermann, Nov. 16, 1823). Eckermann makes

the following reflection on the state of mind of the great old man.

“His trouble seems to be not merely physical. The passionate desire

which he acquired for a young lady at Marienbad this summer, and

against which he is still struggling, must be regarded as the chief

cause of his illness” (Nov. 17, 1823).

As in all earlier crises, Goethe sought consolation in poetry and

love. He left Marienbad in a carriage and began to set down verses

astonishingly vigorous for so old a man. His Marienbad elegy is held to

be one of the best of his poetical achievements. The following extracts

will give an idea of his state of mind at that period.

“I am lost in unconquerable desire; there is nothing left but

everlasting tears. Let them flow, let them flow unceasingly. But they

can never extinguish the fire that burns me. My heart rages; it is

torn in pieces, this heart where life and death meet in a horrible

combat.” “I have lost the universe, I have lost myself, I who until now

have been the favourite of the gods; they have put me to the question,

they offered me Pandora, rich in treasure and still richer in perilous

seductions; they made me drunken with the kisses of her mouth, which

gave me its sweets; they have torn me from her arms, and have struck me

with death.”

Goethe concealed his elegy for some time, guarding it as something

sacred, but eventually handed it over to Eckermann. Poetic creation

soothed his mind only for a time. His nature demanded some more

efficacious consolation. A few weeks after the separation he began to

complain bitterly of the absence of the Countess Julie von Egloffstein,

whom he wanted very much. “She cannot know what she is keeping from me

and what she makes me lose, nor can she know how I love her and how

she engrosses my mind.” He derived a little comfort from the visits of

Madame Szymanowska, whom he admired “not only as a great artist, but

as a pretty woman” (Eckermann, Nov. 3, 1823). “I am deeply grateful

to this charming woman,” he said to the chancellor, “for her beauty,

her sweetness, and her art have soothed my passionate heart” (Bode, p.

151). He also renewed his relations with Marianne Jung, the retired

actress and dancer. “When Goethe had to turn his thoughts from Ulrique,

the image of the pretty owner of Gerbermühle again occupied his mind. A

visit to her, and intimate correspondence with her, restored peace to

his heart so greedy of love” (Bielschowsky, vol. ii, p. 487).

His devotion to Ulrique was Goethe’s last acute attack of love; but

until the end of his days he felt the need of being surrounded by

pretty women. As director of the theatre, he came in contact with many

young women who wished engagements. He confessed to Eckermann that he

required much strength of mind to resist feminine charms which tempted

him to be unjustly favourable to the prettiest of those who sought

employment. “If I allowed myself to fall into an intrigue of gallantry,

I would become like a demagnetised needle as soon as the girl found a

real lover” (Eckermann, March 22, 1825).

His daughter-in-law’s sister has related that Goethe liked to have

young girls in his study whilst he was at work. They had to sit

quietly, neither working nor talking, often a difficult task for them

(Bode, p. 155).

Even on the last day of his life, whilst in delirium, he cried out,

“What a pretty woman’s head with black curls on a black ground” (Lewes,

vol. ii, p. 372). After uttering several other more or less incoherent

phrases, he drew his last breath.

The facts which I described in the chapter of this book dealing with

old age have made clear how long sexuality persists in men. As the

testes resist atrophy better than other organs, and even in extreme old

age still form active spermatozoa, it is natural that their condition

should be reflected on the organism generally, and that feelings of

love should still be excited. If by some accident Goethe had become

a eunuch early in life, he would have been a different being. The

moralists who have been shocked by his amorous intrigues would have

been satisfied, but the world would have lost a great poet. Moreover,

Goethe is no exceptional case amongst writers. The temperament of

Victor Hugo and his devotion to women up to the end of his days are

well known. More recently, after the death of Ibsen, a profound

sensation was made by the revelation of his love for Mademoiselle

Bardach, who inspired his genius during the last period of his life.

Not only poetic creation but other forms of genius are intimately

associated with the sexual function. The philosopher Schopenhauer, who

was no ascetic, wrote as follows, at the age of twenty-five, when he

was in full creative activity, “In the days and at the hours when the

voluptuous instinct is strongest, when it is a burning covetousness,

it is then that the greatest forces of the mind and the greatest

stores of knowledge are ready for the most intense activity.” “At

such moments life is truly at its strongest and most active, for its

two poles are then operating most actively; and this is plain in the

man of the highest intelligence. In these hours one sees more than in

years of passivity” (quoted in Moebius’ _Schopenhauer_, p. 55). “This

means that in Schopenhauer intellectual creation was linked with erotic

excitement” (_ibid._, p. 57).

It was facts of such a nature that led Brown-Séquard to his idea of

strengthening cerebral activity by injections of the substance of

testes. To obtain the same effect, he prescribed another means, the

value of which was proved in the case of two individuals aged from

forty-five to fifty years, the observations being continued over

several years. “By my advice,” he said, “when these had to perform

any great physical or intellectual work, they got themselves into a

condition of sexual excitement.” “The testes being in this way thrown

into functional activity, there was soon produced the desired increase

in the power of the nerve centres.”[198]

Although I insist on the existence of a close relation between

intellectual activity and the sexual function, I do not mean to assert

that there have not existed exceptions to the rule.

Now that I have described certain important factors in the genius of

Goethe, I shall pass on to a study of his state of mind in the last

period of his life, the splendour and harmony of which have been so

often admired.

III

GOETHE’S OLD AGE

Old age of Goethe—Physical and intellectual vigour of

the old man—Optimistic conception of life—Happiness in

life in his last period

Drinkers of wine may take the case of Goethe as an argument against

temperance. Although he was not healthy in his youth, his large

consumption of wine did not prevent him from enjoying an old age full

of force and intellectual work. Eckermann, who was his intimate and

constant companion in the last ten years of his life, was never weary

of expressing his surprise and delight at the physical and moral vigour

of the distinguished old man. He found Goethe on his return to Jena,

at the age of seventy-four, in a condition “very pleasant to see; he

was in good health and robust, so that he could walk for hours” (Sept.

15, 1823). His eyes were “brilliant and clear and his whole expression

was that of joy, vigour and youth” (Oct. 29). In walks with Eckermann,

Goethe forced the pace and showed strength which filled his companion

with delight (March, 1824). His voice was full of character and of

force (March 30, 1824), and every word showed his vitality (July 9,

1827).

In a conversation that Eckermann had with Goethe when the latter was

seventy-nine years old “the sound of his voice and the fire in his eyes

were of such strength as would have been normal in the full flush

of youth” (Mar. 11, 1828). Such characters were preserved until the

end of the life of the great man, and a few months before his death

Eckermann jotted in his book that he saw him every day in full vigour

and freshness, looking as if his health might be prolonged indefinitely

(Dec. 21, 1831). In the beginning of the following spring, Goethe

caught a feverish cold, possibly pneumonic, and died, probably from

weakness of the heart. His illness lasted a week. If he had not been a

drinker of wine he would have been able to withstand this attack and to

live still longer.

The intellectual vigour of Goethe was even greater and more remarkable

than his physical strength. His interests were extremely wide, and his

thirst for knowledge was never appeased. Once, when he was absorbed

by the interest of hearing d’Alton describe in detail the skeleton of

rodents, Eckermann states his surprise that a man not far short of

eighty years old “did not give up seeking for and gaining knowledge.”

But in these matters he never lost his interest. He wished always to go

further and further, always to learn, so showing himself to be a man

of eternal and undying youth (April 16, 1825). Goethe’s aptitude for

understanding and his memory were most unusual. When he was more than

eighty, he surprised those who heard him “by the incessant flow of his

ideas and by his extraordinary fertility in invention” (Oct. 7, 1828).

“The old age of Goethe is the most striking proof of the extreme force

of his constitution,” said his medical biographer, Dr. Moebius. Works

which were written in his last years are for the most part beyond

praise, both because of their finished form, and by their wisdom and

feeling. What other man of eighty has written anything of the same

character? From the physiological point of view I am more surprised

at his works when he was old than at those of his youthful activity”

(Moebius, _Goethe_, i, 200, 201).

Although Goethe’s character, which was fiery and intense in his youth,

became much more calm with age, there still came to him moments when

he was carried away. He had certain eccentricities of an old man, and

in particular was often very despotic, and this trait has been the

occasion of many stories. His temper, however, became much more certain

in his old age, and his general conceptions much more optimistic.

Apart from certain short crises, he was happy in his life. In 1828, he

settled down at Dornburg and there passed a tranquil existence. “I stay

out of doors nearly all day and engage in private conversations with

the tendrils of the vine which communicate their excellent ideas to

me, ideas about which I shall have marvellous things to tell you”—he

wrote to Eckermann on June 15, 1828—“I am composing verses which are

quite good, and I hope that it will be given to me to live long in

this condition. I am quite contented,” he said to his collaborator,

“at the beginning of spring, when I see the first green leaves, I am

pleased to watch how, from week to week, one leaf after another appears

on the stem. I am delighted in May, when I see a flower-bud; I feel

really happy, when in June the rose offers to me its splendour and its

perfume” (Eckermann, April 27, 1825). His delight in life at this epoch

is also revealed in many letters. “I wish to whisper this in your ear,”

he wrote to Zelter on April 29, 1830. “I am delighted to find that even

at my great age, ideas come to me the pursuit and development of which

would require a second life.”

His conception of life had changed enormously since the epoch of

_Werther_. Goethe himself said: “When one is old, one thinks many

things about this world quite different from when one was young”

(Eckermann, Dec., 1829). The youthful sensitiveness which had brought

him so much suffering was notably dulled. Eckermann was astonished

at the way he accepted wounds to his pride. It happened that his

design for the new theatre at Weimar was abandoned while it was being

constructed, and replaced by another not his own work. Eckermann

was much disturbed by this, and went to see Goethe in a state of

apprehension. “I was afraid,” he said, “that so unexpected a step

would profoundly wound Goethe. Well, there was nothing of the sort;

I found him in the best of tempers, quite calm, absolutely above all

feelings in the matter.” When he had reached his eighty-fourth year,

Goethe had no weariness of life. In his last illness, he showed not

the smallest desire to die. He expected to get better, and thought

that the approach of summer would restore his strength. The desire to

live was strong in him. None the less, he recognised that his cycle of

life was finished, and although he had no weariness of life, he felt

a kind of satisfaction that life was over. “When, like me, a man has

lived eighty years,” he said, “he has hardly the right to live, but

ought to be ready every day to die, and to think of putting his house

in order” (Eckermann, May 15, 1831). None the less, he continued his

work, in particular revising the last two chapters of the second part

of _Faust_. When he had finished them, Goethe was extremely pleased. “I

can consider,” he said, “any days which come to me yet as a real gift,

as it is a matter of no moment if I write anything more or what such

work should be” (Eckermann, June 1, 1831).

Goethe gave Faust one hundred years of life, and it is probable that he

thought of that period as his own span. Although he did not reach it,

he approached it, after having lived a most active life, full of most

valuable lessons for posterity.

IV

GOETHE AND “FAUST”

_Faust_ the biography of Goethe—The three monologues

in the first Part—Faust’s pessimism—The brain-fatigue

which finds a remedy in love—The romance with Marguerite

and its unhappy ending

“Goethe was Faust, Faust Goethe,” said the biographer of the great

poet (Bielschowsky, vol. ii, p. 645). Most people admit that in

_Faust_ Goethe gave his autobiography on a more detailed scale than

in _Werther_. Why then should I follow my analysis of Goethe himself,

which was based on exact facts, with an analysis of Faust? I do so

because in addition to the biographical details in _Faust_, there are

many ideas which illuminate the poet’s conception of life. Goethe’s

life explains _Faust_, and _Faust_ explains the soul of its author.

And I am convinced that an accurate study of so great a man is of high

importance in the investigation of human nature.

The two Parts of _Faust_ correspond with two distinct periods in

Goethe’s life. In the first Part, Faust was pessimistic, in the second

optimistic. Although many of the high problems that occupy humanity are

raised and discussed in _Faust_, love is the centre on which the drama

turns.

In the first Part, conceived and for the most part written during

his youth, the chief theme is the love of a young man for a pretty

and attractive girl towards whom the hero acts in a fashion opposed

to conventional morality. As in most of his principal works, Goethe

has made an episode in his own life the basis of _Faust_. It is the

well-known story of Frederique, the daughter of a clergyman, for

whom the brilliant young author conceived a violent passion and who

returned his affection with a deeper and more enduring feeling. Goethe

was alarmed at the possibility of definitely settling his future, and

deserted the poor victim of love in an unfortunate state. Later on, he

confessed to the Baroness von Stein that he had abandoned Frederique

at a time when his desertion was likely to cause the death of the poor

girl. “I had wounded to the quick,” he wrote (Bielschowsky, vol. i, p.

135), “the best heart in the world, and I had to repent of it long and

almost unendurably.” As an atonement, he made Frederique the heroine

of “Goetz” and of “Clavigo,” but not thinking these worthy of her, he

immortalised her as the Marguerite of _Faust_.

A learned doctor, skilled in all human knowledge, but who had found

no satisfaction in his studies, found consolation in the beauty and

charm of a young girl with whom he fell passionately in love. It will

be interesting to trace the psychological process which induced him to

leave the scene of his scientific studies for the streets and resorts

where he found Marguerite.

Although Faust was represented as an old man, who had had time enough

to absorb all human learning, his image bears the stamp of green youth.

“Discontented with all his knowledge, he wished to know the secret

entrails of the world, to be a witness of the centre of all activity,

to unveil the principle of life.”[199] These are the demands of a young

man seeking to resolve the most intricate problems at one stroke. The

speech in question dates from the period of _Werther_, when Goethe

was twenty-five years old, and for that reason leaves no very serious

impression.[200] The second monologue, which ends with the attempt to

take poison, is later, and is absent in the edition of 1790 (Fragment).

It was revised when Goethe had reached his fiftieth year, and displays

a riper maturity. Although lacking exactness, it depicts in an

interesting fashion the miseries of life.

Some alien substance more and more is cleaving

To all the mind conceives of grand and fair;

When this world’s Good is won by our achieving,

The Better, then, is named a cheat and snare.

The fine emotions, whence our lives we mould,

Lie in the earthly tumult dumb and cold.

If hopeful Fancy once, in daring flight,

Her longings to the Infinite expanded,

Yet now a narrow space contents her quite,

Since Time’s wild wave so many a fortune stranded.

Care at the bottom of the heart is lurking;

Her secret pangs in silence working,

She, restless, rocks herself, disturbing joy and rest;

In newer masks her face is ever drest,

By turns as house and land, as wife and child, presented,—

As water, fire, as poison, steel;

We dread the blows we never feel,

And what we never lose is yet by us lamented.[201]

Fear of the evils which lie in wait for us and against which we can

make no provision render life insupportable. Faust’s frame of mind as

described in these lines recalls Schopenhauer, who was always afraid of

something; fear, sometimes of thieves, sometimes of diseases, tormented

him. He would never go to a barber’s to be shaved, and always carried

his own drinking cup with him.

“Is it not better to end such a life, and to kill oneself, even if it

mean annihilation?” asked Faust. He took up the poisoned goblet and

put it to his lips, but, arrested by singing and the sound of bells

outside, he refrained, and life laid hold of him. Not religious faith,

however, but memories of childhood, “the happy sports of youth and the

gay festivals of spring” were the agencies that recalled Faust to the

earth. He went out of doors, mingled with the crowd, tried to amuse

himself amongst men, and savoured the beauty of the new-born spring,

but all these could not make him forget the evil of life. He met his

pupil, talked with him, and again displayed his pessimism.

O happy he, who still renews

The hope, from Error’s deeps to rise for ever!

That which one does not know, one needs to use;

And what one knows, one uses never.[202]

Then follows the celebrated monologue of Faust over which so many

commentators have lost their heads and wasted oceans of ink.

Two souls, alas! reside within my breast,

And each withdraws from, and repels, its brother.

One with tenacious organs holds in love

And clinging lust the world in its embraces;

The other strongly sweeps, this dust above,

Into the high ancestral spaces.[203]

On this passage has been built up a whole theory of “double natures”

with which has been incorporated the dualism of Manicheism, the two

natures of Christ and what not besides.[204]

There exists in literature no better expression of human disharmony

than this monologue “of the two souls.” It portrays the unbalanced

condition so frequent in youth and is a valuable indication of the real

youth of Faust.

On his return to his study, Faust again revealed his pessimism.

But ah! I feel, though will thereto be stronger,

Contentment flows from out my breast no longer.

Why must the stream so soon run dry and fail us,

And burning thirst again assail us?

Therein I’ve borne so much probation![205]

It is at this point that Faust addresses the Spirit “that denies” and

that is called “sin” and “evil.” This spirit invokes before his eyes

“the fairest images of dreams,” that is to say, a woman’s body in its

beautiful nudity. Faust declares himself

Too old to play with passion,

Too young to be without desire.[206]

Pursued by desire

... when night descends, how anxiously

Upon my couch of sleep I lay me.

There, also, comes no rest to me;

But some wild dream is sent to fray me.[207]

So that

Death is desired, and Life a thing unblest.

O fortunate, for whom, when victory glances,

The bloody laurels on the brow he bindeth!

Whom, after rapid, maddening dances,

In clasping maiden-arms he findeth![208]

Faust thus reached the ecstasy of passion. Soon afterwards in the

Witches’ kitchen, he saw in a mirror a “heavenly form” and cried:—

O lend me, Love, the swiftest of thy pinions,

And bear me to her beauteous field.

A woman’s form, in beauty shining!

Can woman, then, so lovely be?

And must I find her body, there reclining;

Of all the heavens, the bright epitome?

Can Earth with such a thing be mated?[209]

Discontent with life, sense of the insufficiency of human knowledge

and the most gloomy pessimism lead to the passion of love which,

eventually, after many devious paths, throws Faust into the arms of

Marguerite. The story is one of the world’s great romances and everyone

knows it. Faust all unconsciously was following the prescription of

Brown-Séquard. Brain-fatigue had made the continuation of the study

which caused it impossible. The condition is plainly stated in the

following lines:—

The thread of Thought at last is broken,

And knowledge brings disgust unspoken.

Let us the sensual deeps explore.[210]

The brain has refused to work, and blind instinct, in the guise of

dreams, whispers that there is in the organism something that can

restore the intellectual forces. This something, however, is what is

called sin, and much courage is needed to plunge into it. Without this

evil, life cannot last. Faust has to choose between love and death, and

chooses love.

The end of the romance of Goethe and Frederique was bad, and that of

Faust and Marguerite was still worse. The poet painted it in the most

sombre colours. Marguerite killed her child, poisoned her mother,

became crazy, and was beheaded. Faust’s cup of misery was filled to the

brim; he blamed his evil genius, he made desperate efforts to save the

poor woman, and cried “O that I had never been born.”

To sum up: in the first Part, Faust is a young, learned man who

expects too much from science and life, and whose genius requires

extra-conjugal love as a stimulant; he is unbalanced and inevitably

pessimistic. It is not surprising that his life goes badly, and that

his conduct leaves him much to repent of. But although, at first,

a vague general discontent nearly drives him to suicide, later on

the terrible evil which he had wrought on a poor creature he loved

passionately did no more than plunge him into misery that was bitter

but far from mortal. His mind had developed far in the direction of

optimism. The crisis through which he passed, serious as it was, ended

by his return to a life of great activity and enterprise.

V

THE OLD AGE OF FAUST

The second Part of _Faust_ is in the main a description

of senile love—Amorous passion of the old man—Humble

attitude of the old Faust—Platonic love for Helena—The

old Faust’s conception of life—His optimism—The general

idea of the play

The first Part of _Faust_ was acclaimed by the world almost as soon as

it appeared, but the second Part met a very cold reception. Everyone

knows and reads the first Part; the second Part has few readers, and

these chiefly poets and dramatists. No doubt it has more effect on the

stage than when it is read, but this is due to subsidiary features in

which it resembles a fine ballet. There is general agreement that the

real meaning of the second Part is obscure, complex and difficult to

interpret. Many literary critics have racked their brains in the effort

to discover the author’s central idea. When Eckermann, who persuaded

Goethe to revise and finish the second Part, asked what was the meaning

of some of the scenes in it, Goethe evaded the question and played the

sphinx. Thus, with regard to the famous “mothers” Goethe answered,

with a mysterious air:—“You have the manuscript; study it, and see

what you can make of it” (January 10, 1830). G. H. Lewes, although

one of Goethe’s most resolute admirers, admitted the impossibility

of grasping the sense of the second Part. The Wanderjahre and the

second Part of _Faust_ were arsenals of symbols, and it pleased the

old poet to see acute critics labouring to interpret them whilst he

was silent and refused to help them. Lewes thought that Goethe, so far

from showing the smallest wish to clear up their difficulties, took

a pleasure in giving them new problems to puzzle over. Lewes himself

thought that the second Part was poor in idea and execution, and

admitted that he had failed after repeatedly trying to get a conception

of it that would reveal its beauties. In writing about it, he contented

himself with giving a summary of it. Now this second Part, although its

general lines had been laid down for long, was actually written during

several years in the last period of the poet’s life. The fact that it

was composed out of the regular sequence of the Acts and Scenes gives

us an important clue. The third Act and then the second Part of the

fifth Act were put on paper first. Next followed the first Act and part

of the second; the classical Walpurgis night was written in 1830, the

fourth Act in 1831, and last of all the beginning of the fifth Act.

As the second Part of _Faust_ is a crowded motley, containing many

subjects, obviously of minor importance, such as the volcanic theory

of the earth and the disquisition on paper-money, the key-note may be

found in the portions which were first composed. Now Act III. contains

the story of Helena, and the second part of Act V. Faust’s activity for

the general welfare.

Setting out from the conception that the works of Goethe reflect the

acts and incidents of his own life, I shall try to explain on that

basis the meaning of the most obscure of his writings.

I have already stated that love was the stimulus of Goethe’s activity

in youth and age; it is the scarlet thread running through his

history. There was no difficulty in his using his love for Frederique

as material for a play; that a young man should love a young girl

was natural enough. The story of an old man enamoured of a young

beauty was quite another matter. It was said that one of the reasons

that prevented his marriage with Ulrique de Lewetzow was the fear of

ridicule (Lewes, _op. cit._, ii, p. 345), a fear that plays a large

part in human affairs. It is easy to understand that the old poet was

in a difficulty when he came to write of senile love. Faust’s love for

Helena was not that of a supposed old man who became young by doffing

his beard and changing his cloak, but of a real old man whom no mystery

nor magic was to make young again. And yet old Faust’s love was a true

passion, and Goethe has written no finer lines than those describing it.

When the second Part begins, Faust has passed through the terrible

crisis of the first Part. Wearied and restless, he seeks a new mode of

life.

Life’s pulses now with fresher force awaken

To greet the mild ethereal twilight o’er me;

This night, thou, Earth! hast also stood unshaken,

And now thou breathest, new-refreshed before me,

And now beginnest, all thy gladness granting,

A vigorous resolution to restore me,

To seek that higher life for which I’m panting.[211]

The invoked image of the most beautiful woman in the history of the

world transforms Faust’s desire of love into an overwhelming passion.

Have I still eyes? Deep in my being springs

The fount of Beauty, in a torrent pouring!

A heavenly gain my path of terror brings.

The world was void, and shut to my exploring,—

And, since my priesthood, how hath it been graced!

Enduring 'tis, desirable, firm-based.

And let my breath of being blow to waste,

If I for thee unlearn my sacred duty!

The form, that long erewhile my fancy captured,

That from the magic mirror so enraptured,

Was but a frothy phantom of such beauty!

'Tis Thou, to whom the stir of all my forces,

The essence of my passion's courses,—

Love, fancy, worship, madness,—here I render.[212]

In the throes of this passion, Faust is tortured by jealousy when he

sees the lovely woman clinging to and kissing a young man. He desires

her at all costs.

Am I nothing here? To stead me,

Is not this key still shining in my hand?

Through realms of terror, wastes and waves it led me,

Through solitudes, to where I firmly stand,

Here foothold is! Realities here centre!

The strife with spirits here the mind may venture,

And on its grand, its double lordship enter!

How far she was, and nearer, how divine!

I’ll rescue her and make her doubly mine.

Ye Mothers! Mothers! Crown this wild endeavour!

Who knows her once must hold her, and for ever.[213]

The disappearance of the beautiful woman so moved Faust that he fainted

and fell into a prolonged sleep. As soon as he recovered consciousness

he asked: “Where is she?” and set out to seek for her. When he learned

that Chiron had already carried off Helena on his back Faust cried

out:—

Her didst thou bear?

_Chiron_: This back she pressed.

_Faust_: Was I not wild enough, before;

And now such seat, to make me blest!

O, I scarcely dare

To trust my senses!—tell me more!

She is my only Aspiration!

Whence didst thou bear her—to what shore?[214]

Thou saw’st her once; _to-day_ I saw her beam,

The dream of Beauty, beautiful as Dream!

My soul, my being, now is bound and chained;

I cannot live, unless she be attained.[215]

Chiron found this attitude of passionate emotion so strange that he

advised Faust to take care of his health.

After many wanderings and difficulties Faust again met the woman he

coveted and spoke to her as follows:—

What else remains, but that I give to thee

Myself, and all I vainly fancied mine?

Let me, before thy feet, in fealty true,

Thee now acknowledge, Lady, whose approach

Won thee at once possession and the throne![216]

This language, so very different from what the same man had formerly

addressed to Marguerite, is much more like that of an old lover to a

young beauty whom he admires. When Helena invited Faust to sit on the

throne beside her, he replied:—

First, kneeling, let the dedication be

Accepted, lofty Lady! Let me kiss

The gracious hand that lifts me to thy side.

Confirm me as co-regent of thy realm,

Whose borders are unknown, and win for thee

Guard, slave and worshipper, and all in one![217]

The old man in the throes of a passion so great that he was wholly

absorbed by it did not dare to address the beloved woman except in the

most humble terms.

Helena made no declaration of love, but was complacent to him, and when

Faust suggested: “Now let our throne become a bower unblighted,” Helena

agreed to follow him to a secluded and green bower. There they remained

alone for some time, cared for by an old servant.

The result of this union was not a child like that to which Marguerite

gave birth and afterwards killed. It was a strange and peculiar being;

a boy who immediately after his birth began to leap about and to alarm

his parents by the activity of his movements.

Although Goethe preserved an obstinate silence when he was asked to

explain many of the scenes in the second Part, he had no hesitation in

explaining the significance of this astonishing child. “The child was

not a human being but an allegory, in which was personified poetry,

which is not bound to any time, to any place, or to any person”

(Eckermann, December 20, 1829). Struck by the tragic fate of Byron,

Goethe made the son of Faust and Helena a symbol of the English poet.

Literary critics, setting out from the categorical explanation of

Goethe himself, have declared that the union of Faust and Helena

was meant to denote the alliance of romanticism and classicism, a

marriage from which was born modern poetry, personified in its highest

representative, Byron. This, however, cannot be the idea of Goethe, who

himself was far from an enthusiast about classicism and romanticism.

“What,” he said, “is all this noise about the classic and the romantic?

The essential thing is that a piece of work should be wholly good and

serious; then it will also be classic” (Eckermann, October 17, 1828).

It is much more probable that Goethe intended poetry to spring from the

relations between the old Faust and his adorable companion, relations

of a kind to be included in so-called platonic love. Such love inspires

the creation of perfect work even in an old poet, when he is stimulated

by a beautiful woman.

When Faust and Helena emerged from the grotto with their son, Helena

said:—

_Helena_: Love, in human wise to bless us,

In a noble pair must be;

But divinely to possess us,

It must form a precious Three.

_Faust_: All we seek has therefore found us;

I am thine and thou art mine!

So we stand as love hath bound us;

Other fortune we resign.[218]

After the death of her son, Helena abandoned Faust, leaving him her

garments:—

_Helena_: Also in me, alas! an old word proves its truth,

That Bliss and Beauty ne’er enduringly unite.

Torn is the link of Life, no less than that of Love;

So, both lamenting, painfully I say: Farewell!

And cast myself again,—once only,—in thine arms.[219]

After this crisis the old Faust sought to console himself in the bosom

of nature, just as after the terrible catastrophe with Marguerite the

contemplation of nature had given him the strength to live. On this

occasion he reached the summit of a high mountain from which he watched

the changing vapours of a cloud which seemed to him to assume the form

of female beauty. But Faust was old, and now saw only memories of love.

He cried out:—

Yes! mine eyes not err!—

On sun-illumined pillows beauteously reclined,

Colossal, truly, but a godlike woman-form,

I see! The like of Juno, Leda, Helena,

Majestically lovely, floats before my sight!

Ah! now ’tis broken! Towering broad and formlessly,

It rests along the east like distant icy hills,

And shapes the grand significance of fleeting days.

Yet still there clings a light and delicate band of mist

Around my breast and brow, caressing, cheering me.

Now light, delaying, it soars and higher soars,

And folds together.—Cheats me an ecstatic form,

As early-youthful, long-foregone and highest bliss?

The first glad treasures of my deepest heart break forth;

Aurora’s love, so light of pinion, is its type,

The swiftly-felt, the first, scarce-comprehended glance,

Outshining every treasure, when retained and held.

Like Spiritual Beauty mounts the gracious Form,

Dissolving not, but lifts itself through ether far,

And from my inner being bears the best away.[220]

This state of mind resembles Goethe’s condition after the rupture with

Ulrique.

Love and poetry alike were over for him. None the less his craving for

the higher life was not yet weakened. The desire to live was still

very strong in the old Faust. But now he no longer as in the days

of his youth dreamed of an ideal which could not be attained. When

Mephistopheles asked him ironically:—

Then might one guess whereunto thou hast striven?

Boldly-sublime it was, I’m sure.

Since nearer to the moon thy flight was driven,

Would now thy mania that realm secure?

_Faust_: Not so! This sphere of earthly soil

Still gives us room for lofty doing.

Astounding plans e’en now are brewing:

I feel new strength for bolder toil.[221]

Such optimistic language, extraordinarily different from Faust’s

lamentations in the first Part, becomes still more marked. When he was

approaching his centenary he made the following profession of faith:—

I only through the world have flown:

Each appetite I seized as by the hair;

What not sufficed me, forth I let it fare,

And what escaped me, I let go.

I’ve only craved, accomplished my delight,

Then wished a second time, and thus with might

Stormed through my life: at first ’twas grand, completely,

But now it moves most wisely and discreetly.

The sphere of Earth is known enough to me;

The view beyond is barred immutably:

A fool, who there his blinking eyes directeth,

And o’er his clouds of peers a place expecteth!

Firm let him stand, and look around him well!

This World means something to the Capable.

Why needs he through Eternity to wend?

He here acquires what he can apprehend.[222]

When he had reached the maturity of his wisdom, Faust organised

drainage works, the object of which was to increase the area of land

that could be utilised:—

To many millions let me furnish soil,

Though not secure, yet free to active toil;

Green, fertile fields.

A land like Paradise here, round about.

Yes! to this thought I hold with firm persistence;

The last result of wisdom stamps it true:

He only earns his freedom and existence,

Who daily conquers them anew.

Thus here, by dangers girt, shall glide away

Of childhood, manhood, age, the vigorous day:

And such a throng I fain would see,

Stand on free soil among a people free!

Then dared I hail the Moment fleeing:

“_Ah, still delay—thou art so fair!_”

The traces cannot, of mine earthly being,

In æons perish,—they are there!—

In proud fore-feeling of such lofty bliss,

I now enjoy the highest Moment,—this![223]

These were the last words of the wise centenarian. It has been said

that they contain the quintessence of Goethe’s moral philosophy, and

that they preach the sacrifice of the individual for the benefit of

society. Lewes, for instance, takes this view, holding that Faust was

the exposition of a man who had conquered the vanity of individual

aspirations and joys, and had come to the knowledge of the great truth

that man must live for man, and can find lasting happiness only in

work for the benefit of humanity. For my own part, it seems to me that

according to Goethe’s _Faust_ man must dedicate a large part of his

life to the complete development of his own individuality, and that

it is only in the second half of his life, when he has grown wise by

experience and feels satisfied as an individual, that he should use

his activity for the good of mankind. It was no part either of the

ideas of Goethe or of the nature of his work to preach the sacrifice of

individuality.

Goethe was thus absorbed in _Faust_ by the problem of the conflict

between certain actions and guiding principles. The misdeeds of the

hero in the first Part of his life had to be redeemed. He said to

Eckermann that “the key to the salvation of Faust was to be found in

the Angels’ Chorus”:—

The noble spirit now is free,

And saved from evil scheming:

Whoe’er aspires unweariedly

Is not beyond redeeming.[224]

However, that of which he did not speak, and which none the less was

most important in Faust and in Goethe himself, is the action of love as

a stimulant to artistic creation, and it was probably to this that he

referred at the end of his tragedy. The mystical chorus sent up prayers

in a religious and erotic ecstasy, and their mysterious song is:—

The Indescribable,

Here it is done;

The Woman-Soul leadeth us

Upward and on![225]

Although these verses have been interpreted as love which sacrifices or

even love which leads to the grace of God (Bode, p. 149), it is much

more probable that it is love for feminine beauty, a love which makes

possible the execution of wonderful things. Such an interpretation

agrees with the fact that the verses are spoken by a _mystic_ choir

which speaks of the _indescribable_ (_das Unbeschreibliche_) in

which we must see the amorous passion of the old man. In such an

interpretation the whole of _Faust_ (and especially the second Part) is

an eloquent pleading for the importance of love in the higher activity

of man, in accordance with the law of human nature, which is a much

better justification of Goethe’s conduct than all the arguments of his

interpreters and admirers.

I do not agree with the common idea that the two Parts of _Faust_ are

two distinct works, but regard them as complementary. In the first Part

we see the young pessimist, full of ardour and of desires, ready to

make an end of his days and stopping at nothing to satisfy his thirst

for love. In the second Part we have a mature old man still loving

women, but in a different way, a man who is wise and optimistic, and

who, having satiated the wants of his individual life, dedicates the

rest of his days to mankind, and who, having reached a century, dies

extremely happy, in fact almost exhibiting the instinct of natural

death.

The Prolongation of Life: Optimistic Studies · 第 8 / 9 章