Then was it not =Bismarck= who said:--

“_You must leave the people through whom you march only their eyes

to weep with._”

It was also the Kaiser who said, addressing his soldiers, “You must only

have one will, and it is mine; there is only one law, and it is mine.”

And then again, I repeat, it was a Berlin wireless that flashed the

official message:--

“The only means of preventing surprise attacks from the civil

population has been to interfere with unrelenting severity and to

create examples which by their frightfulness would be a warning to

the whole country.”

Need we seek further to fix the responsibility?

War Rights.

What are the rights of nations in a state of war? There are first of all

the unwritten laws of nations and humanity which need, or should need,

no defining amongst civilized peoples. There are also the definite and

specific Acts laid down at The Hague Convention, which it was declared

by the signatories would not be legitimate in war between civilized

nations. Germany was a signatory to The Hague Convention. At this

Convention the Powers limited the rights of belligerents in the means to

be adopted of injuring the enemy. Here are some of them:--

German Atrocities: A Record of Shameless Deeds · 第 30 / 56 题