CHAPTER XI.

THE QUAKERS.

Modern Christianity, it is often said, has little in common with that of

apostolic times: I fear it is equally true that the Quakerism of to-day

has little in common with the heroic Quakerism of an earlier day. It was

in 1646, during the prevalence of civil and religious commotions, that

George Fox commenced his labours as minister of the Gospel, being then in

the twenty-third year of his age. It was a hard time of it he and his

disciples had; no men ever fared worse and for less provocation given, at

the hands of arbitrary powers, than did the Quakers. Baxter thus

describes them:--"They made the light which every man hath within him to

be his sufficient rule, and consequently the Scripture and ministry were

set light by. They spake much for the dwelling and working of the Spirit

in us, but little of justification and the pardon of sin and our

reconciliation with God through Jesus Christ. They pretend their

dependence on the Spirit's conduct against set times of prayer and

against sacraments, and against undue esteem of Scripture and ministry.

They will not have the Scriptures called the Word of God. Their

principal zeal lieth in railing at the ministers as hirelings, deceivers,

false prophets, &c., and in refusing to swear before a magistrate, or to

put off their hat to any, or to say _you_ instead of _thou_ or _thee_,

which are their words to all. At first they did use to fall into

wailings and tremblings at their meetings, and pretend to be intently

acted on by the Spirit, but now that is ceased. They only meet, and he

that pretendeth to be moved by the Spirit speaketh, and sometimes they

say nothing but sit an hour or more in silence and then depart." The

most fiery, the most untameable of men were the old Quakers, now a Friend

is the sleekest and fattest of men; lives in a style of the utmost

comfort, and wears the best of everything; there are no such homes of

luxury, no such lives of ease as amongst the Quakers. It is no wonder

they are a long-lived race. They mingle little with the world, and find

a peace which often the worldlings miss. As a religious organization

they are becoming weaker every day; they have a few chapels in various

parts of London, but as the old worshippers die off no new ones appear.

At their last annual meeting Mr. R. Barclay, who referred with

satisfaction to the fact that all over the land, Sunday by Sunday, 1100

Friends were engaged in teaching 1400 children and 3000 adults, regretted

to find that no other Church had declined so much either in this country

or in America since 1720. In the United States 13,000 seats were closed

in the meeting-houses between 1850 and 1860. "If," said he, "other

Churches had declined as we have done, Christianity must have died out."

As regards the metropolis they seem to be in a little better condition;

the last statistics of membership show an increase of 95 in the year, the

whole number being 6608 males, 7286 females; total, 13,894; the births

exactly balanced the deaths. There were 121 new members from

convincement and 61 resignations, against 31 disownments there were 19

reinstated. The habitual attenders at the places of worship are 3803,

being an increase of 145. It was remarked by a senior Friend that the

resignations were fewer and the convincements more than in any year since

accounts had been kept; Mr. Tallack gave it as his opinion that the

Society was never more healthy, not even in the first years of its

existence; J. Grubb believed that there was a considerable change for the

better, both as regards public and private prayer. It is to be hoped

such may turn out to be the case. The great characteristic testimony of

the Friends, particularly against ecclesiastical pretensions on the one

side and against religious forms on the other, is as much requisite now

as ever; there is, as one of their official documents remarks, "a strong

tendency in the human mind to substitute the form of religion for the

power, and to satisfy the conscience by a cold compliance with exterior

performances while the heart remains unchanged. And inasmuch as the

baptism of the Holy Ghost and the communion of the body and blood of

Christ, of which water baptism, and bread and wine, are admitted to be

only signs, are not dependent on those outward ceremonies or necessarily

connected with them, and are declared in Holy Scripture to be effectual

to the salvation of the soul, which the signs are not, Friends have

always believed it to be their place and duty to hold forth to the world

a clear and decided testimony to the living substance--the spiritual work

of Christ in the soul and a blessed communion with him there."

Practically, in the promotion of temperance and education, in the

improvement of prisons and prison discipline, in the advocacy of

universal peace and freedom, in philanthropy and charity, the Friends

have ever led the way. For such ends they have freely sacrificed money

and time, and energy and life itself; nor do they forget those of their

own household, as it were; every poor Friend who may be unable to earn a

livelihood usually receives aid from his brother members to the extent of

20_l._ to 40_l._ per annum (administered privately in general), according

to age or infirmity. When the poorer Friends are out of a situation they

are often helped to obtain employment by various arrangements under free

registries, and by the aid of private inquiries for vacancies. In

addition it may be remarked that a large number of charitable bequests

and special funds have been bequeathed for the local or general benefit

of the members of this religious community. The City of London owes much

to Quakers, who in time past by their industry and self-denial laid the

foundations of many of its noblest charities and its most princely

mercantile establishments.

JONATHAN GRUBB AT THE AGRICULTURAL HALL.

Long, long ago the wise men came from the East, and from the east of

England has come to us a man wise, in the opinion of his friends, in the

best wisdom. It is of Mr. Jonathan Grubb I write, who has been living in

Sudbury for many years, and who for the last twelve or fourteen has

almost entirely devoted himself to missionary work in various parts of

England, Scotland, and Ireland. I think as a temperance lecturer he

first came before the public. It was the sin of drunkenness which first

led him to lecturing. He had seen the evils of intemperance; he had seen

what poverty, what wretchedness and crime were its results; and much and

deeply moved thereby he mounted the platform, which more or less ever

since has been familiar with his name. While in Cornwall on one occasion

he found an opportunity of talking on something else--on that common

salvation without which, in the opinion of pious people, temperance

itself is of little worth. The opportunity was one of great spiritual

benefit, and ever since he has been engaged in what is called by the

denomination to which he belongs--the denomination whose energetic and

untiring philanthropy has been honoured all the world over--the

denomination which, from the days of George Fox, has ever borne a silent

protest against the frivolities of fashion and the vanities of

life--public preaching. In the opinion of those excellent people an

ordinary minister is not a public preacher at all. They reserve that

title exclusively for one who, like Mr. Grubb, goes out into the world,

as it were, collects the crowds by the wayside, on the seashore, in the

crowded street, and there, to those for whose souls few care, who

otherwise would perish for lack of knowledge, proclaims that Gospel which

tells how, for such as they, pardon can be secured and life and

immortality brought to light. In our day no Friend is more extensively

engaged in this work than Mr. Grubb. In all parts of Suffolk his labours

have been many. In various districts of the metropolis he has been

similarly engaged. He has also spent much time in Ireland--where he has

been listened to and aided by Roman Catholic and Protestant alike. It

was only on one occasion that he has ever been prevented from preaching

by the intrusion of a mob, and that was (tell it not in Gath, publish it

not in the streets of Askalon) in no less ancient and respectable a

borough than that of Bury St. Edmunds. In the filthiest and most

depraved districts of London, in the very heart of Roman Catholic

Ireland, he has never been interfered with at all. Of course some of

this success is due to Mr. Grubb himself. With his one aim to tell how

sinners may be saved, he has been remarkably successful in avoiding

collision with class feelings and sectarian animosities. His manner is

also eminently kind and gentle; but after all does not his experience

also show, what we have long believed, that honest, simple, faithful

preaching is never exercised in vain? It may be also said that some of

Mr. Grubb's qualifications are hereditary. By birth he is an Irishman

(he comes from Tipperary), and his mother was an eminent Quakeress, and

extensively useful in her day. It was a sermon from her that was the

instrument, humanly speaking, in the conversion of one of the most

respected of our open-air preachers in London at the present day. We

take much from those to whom we owe our being. Why should we not also

inherit some of their excellences? The question may be asked though not

answered here.

But to return to Mr. Grubb. The last time I heard him he had a truly

magnificent congregation at the Agricultural Hall, Islington. Mr. Thain

Davidson's well meant effort to attract outsiders, and to keep up a large

Sunday-afternoon service, now that the novelty of the thing has passed

away, seems as successful as ever. He and his people have lately moved

into the new hall, a most commodious building, and right well do they

fill it. It will be much to be regretted if this scheme fall through for

want of funds. It appears much good has resulted from it. Not a week

passes but cases occur in which it has been shown how awakening have been

the addresses delivered. A service that only lasts an hour is a

desideratum. No one could have listened to Mr. Grubb without feeling how

his kind of address is pre-eminently adapted to encourage and stimulate

the religious life, to arrest the attention of the impenitent, and to

touch especially the hearts of the young. Mr. Grubb takes no text,

preaches no formal sermon, aims at no rhetorical flight, does not strike

you as being very intellectual, or very original, or very learned. It

may be that he is all three--it certainly is not for me to say that he is

not--but whether he be so or not, it is clear that he judges and judges

rightly that, at the Agricultural Hall on a Sunday afternoon what is

wanted is not the glare of the rhetorician, not the learning of the

divine, not the elaborate argument of the trained logician, not the fancy

of the poet, not the dramatic action of the elocutionist, but the tender

beseeching of one who, saved by Divine mercy himself, and assured of all

its fulness and omnipotence, would force a similar boon on all around.

It was thus he preached on Sunday afternoon. He seemed to speak out of

the depth of a holy love, in language very simple, abounding with the

commonest, and, as some might think, most worn of Scripture quotations,

yet with a pathos that, as it came from the heart, at once reached the

hearts of all his hearers. A more homely or plainer-looking man than Mr.

Grubb you don't often see. As he stood there, with his sunburnt, honest

face, with his suit of sober black and grey, with his rustic air, you

felt that his power (for there was not a single unattentive hearer) was

such as a Whitefield or a Wesley wielded, and which has never been

exerted in our world in vain. Man's fallen state, his need of pardon,

his need of pardon now, the danger of delay, the duty of all instantly to

receive the proffered grace--such were his themes. He told them he had

stood by the death-bed of a woman who had believed that there was no

mercy for such a wicked old sinner as she was, and had heard her song of

joy as she passed from the poverty and sorrow of earth to the wealth and

joy of heaven. Yes, for all there was mercy, and that all there present

might attain it was his prayer; and as thus he spoke, light came to his

eye and animation to his voice, and, with uplifted arm and flowing

utterance, he gave you his idea of the true evangelist--the man always

needed in our land--and it is to be feared, in spite of all our boasted

Christianity, never more than now. But it is not for me to say what are

Mr. Grubb's peculiar qualifications for his work. What they are may be

best gathered from his abundant labours. In his own denomination it is

well known how numerous are his efforts and how great his successes. He

is a fitting representative of active and spiritual Quakerism. Men say

that body is not what it was; that it is losing its power; that it has

little hold upon the people; that it makes no converts. It may be so,

but if it has many such ministers as Mr. Grubb in its midst, as much as

any it is fitted with a living ministry which will go out into the

highways and hedges and bring back to the fold those who have wandered

far away. His appeal is not to the high and mighty, to the rich, the

learned, or the great, but to the poorest of the poor. Mr. Grubb's

mission is evidently a special one. Amongst fallen women, in districts

where ragged-schools and churches are required, in corners of our land

where no regular means of grace exist, he finds special charm and need.

It is pleasant to see him supported by the good men and true of his own

denomination and others. It is evident that at the Agricultural

Hall--perhaps all the better for its not being professedly such--we have

the true idea of an Evangelical Alliance, an alliance for Christian work

rather than of Christian creed, an alliance practical, not speculative,

not in form and dogma, but in life and love.

The Religious Life of London · 第 11 / 19 章