MILTON'S WIDOW.

(Vol. viii., pp. 12. 134. 200. 375. 452. 471.)

It is pleasing to find so much interest excited among the readers of "N. &

Q." relative to the parentage of this lady; and we may fairly hope that the

spirit of research which has thus been awakened, will not die away until

the last spark of error and mystery has been extinguished.

T. L. P. has favoured us with quotations from a little pamphlet, entitled

_Historical Facts connected with Nantwich and its Neighbourhood_. Now,

after giving this work a most careful perusal, I cannot but think that the

title of the book is, in this instance at least, a misnomer. The authoress,

for it was written by a lady long resident in the vicinity, has evidently

wrought upon the foundations of others; and taking the veteran Ormerod as a

sufficient authority, has given full vent to her imagination, and pictured,

with "no 'prentice hand," the welcome visits of Milton to Stoke Hall, a

place which, in all probability, was never once honoured with the presence

of this great man. There is no evidence whatever adduced to give even the

semblance of colour to this unfortunate error; whereas, on the side of the

Wistaston family, the proofs of its identity as the family of Mrs. Milton

are numerous and, to my notion, incontrovertible.

As if, indeed, to give us "confirmation sure" of the truth of this

position, our old friend CRANMORE starts up, "like a spirit from the vasty

deep," and, after an absence of many months from our ranks, pays off his

ancient score by producing the evidence he so long ago promised us. From it

we gather that Thomas Paget, the father, named his _cousin_ Minshull,

apothecary in Manchester, overseer of his will; and that his son, Nathan

Paget, eighteen years afterwards, names in his will John Goldsmith and

Elizabeth Milton as _his cousins_, and makes bequests to them accordingly.

Now, it so happens that Thomas, son of Richard Minshull of Wistaston, was

an _apothecary_, and that he settled in _Manchester_, and thereupon founded

the family of Minshull of Manchester. This {545} gentleman was doubtless

the _cousin_ referred to in the will of the elder Paget. It farther

happens, that Thomas Minshull, the grandfather of this Manchester

apothecary, married a daughter of Goldsmith of Nantwich. The John Goldsmith

of the Middle Temple would then doubtless be the nephew or grand-nephew of

this lady, and in either case a _cousin_ of Thomas Minshull of Manchester,

and of Elizabeth Minshull of Wistaston. This is another, if not a

completing link in the genealogical chain, and convinces me, now more than

ever, of the correctness of my conclusions.

I may add that the whole of the deeds referred to by MR. SINGER are now in

the safe and worthy keeping of Mr. J. Fitchett Marsh of Warrington; and

that they are published _in extenso_, together with a valuable essay on

their historical importance by their present possessor, in the first volume

of _Miscellanies_ issued by the Chetham Society.

Notes and Queries, Number 214, December 3, 1853 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 58 / 136 题