II

Apollodorus came in the other morning and announced to the Easy Chair that

it had been made by common consent arbiter of a dispute in a circle of

young men. "The question," said he, "is not a new one in itself, but it

constantly recurs, for it is the inquiry under what conditions a gentleman

may smoke in the presence of ladies."

The Easy Chair replied that it could not answer more pertinently than in

the words of the famous Princess Emilia, who, upon being asked by a youth

who was attending her in a promenade around the garden, "What should you

say if a gentleman asked to smoke as he walked with you?" replied, "It is

not supposable, for no gentleman would propose it."

Naturally that youth did not venture to light even a cigarette. Emilia had

parried his question so dexterously that, although the rebuke was stinging,

he could not even pretend to be offended. His question was merely a form of

saying, "I am about to smoke, and what have you to say?" That he asked the

question was evidence of a lingering persuasion, inherited from an ancestry

of gentlemen, that it was not seemly to puff tobacco smoke around a lady

with whom he was walking.

Apollodorus was silent for a moment, as if reflecting whether this anecdote

was to be regarded as a general judgment of the arbiter that a gentleman

will never smoke in the presence of a lady. But the Easy Chair broke in

upon his meditation with a question, "If you had a son, should you wish to

meet him smoking as he accompanied a lady upon the avenue? or, were you

the father of a daughter, should you wish to see her cavalier smoking as

he walked by her side? Upon your own theory of what is gentlemanly and

courteous and respectful and becoming in the manner of a man towards a

woman, should you regard the spectacle with satisfaction?"

"Well," replied Apollodorus, "isn't that rather a high-flying view? When

can a man smoke--"

"But you are not answering," interrupted the Easy Chair. "Of two youths

walking with your daughter, one of whom was smoking a cigarette, or a

cigar, or a pipe, as he attended her, and the other was not smoking, which

would seem to you the more gentlemanly?"

"The latter," said Apollodorus, promptly and frankly.

"It appears, then," returned the Easy Chair, assuming the Socratic manner,

"that there are circumstances under which a gentleman will not smoke in

the presence of a lady. But to answer your question directly, it is not

possible to prescribe an exact code, although certain conditions may be

definitely stated. For instance, a gentleman will not smoke while walking

with a lady in the street. He will not smoke while paying her an evening

visit in her drawing-room. He will not smoke while driving with her in the

Park."

It is significant of a radical change in manners that such rules can

be laid down, because formerly the question could not have arisen. The

grandfather of Apollodorus, who was the flower of courtesy, could no more

have smoked with a lady with whom he was walking or driving than he could

have attended her without a coat or collar. Yet manners change, and the

grandfather must not insist that those of his time were best because they

were those of his time. It is but a little while since that a gentleman

who appeared at a party without gloves would have been a "queer" figure.

But now should he wear gloves he would be remarked as unfamiliar with good

usage.

It does not argue a decline of courtesy that the Grandisonian compliment

and the ineffable bending over a lady's hand and respectful kissing of the

finger-tips have yielded to a simpler and less stately manner. The woman

of the minuet was not really more respected than the woman of the waltz.

However the word gentlemanly may be defined, it will not be questioned

that the quality which it describes is sympathetic regard for the feelings

of others and the manner which evinces it. The manner, of course, may be

counterfeited and put to base uses. To say that Lovelace has a gentlemanly

manner is not to say that he is a gentleman, but only that he has caught

the trick of a gentleman. To call him or Robert Macaire or Richard Turpin a

gentleman is to say only that he behaves as a gentleman behaves. But he is

not a gentleman, unless that word describes manners and nothing more.

This is the key to the question of Apollodorus. It is not easy to define a

gentleman, but it is perfectly easy to see that in his pleasures and in the

little indifferent practices of society the gentleman will do nothing which

is disagreeable to others. He certainly will not assume that a personal

gratification or indulgence must necessarily be pleasant to others, nor

will he make the selfish habits of others a plea for his own.

Apollodorus listened patiently, and then said slowly that he understood the

judgment to be that a gentleman would smoke in the presence of ladies only

when he knew that it was agreeable to them, but that, as the infinite grace

and courtesy of women often led them, as an act of self-denial, to persuade

themselves that what others wish to do ought not to annoy them, it was very

difficult to know whether the practice was or was not offensive to any

particular lady, and therefore--therefore--

The youth seemed to be unable to draw the conclusion.

"Therefore," said the mentor, "it is well to remember the old rule in

whist."

"Which is--?" asked Apollodorus.

"When in doubt, trump the trick."

"But what is the special application of that rule to this case?"

"Precisely this, that the doubting smoker should follow the advice of

_Punch_ to those about to marry."

"Which is--?" asked Apollodorus.

"Don't."

(_September_, 1883)

Ars Recte Vivendi; Being Essays Contributed to "The Easy Chair" · 第 26 / 34 题