MORALITY

The question whether morality is based on religion, or religion on

morality, is one which calls for discussion, inasmuch as it is apt to

proceed on a mistaken view of facts in the history of religion. It is

maintained that as a matter of history morality came first and religion

afterwards; and that as a matter of philosophy religion presupposes

morality. Reality, that is to say, is in the making; the spirit of man

is self-realising; being is in process of becoming rationalised and

moralised; religion in process of disappearing.

Early religion, it is said, is unethical: it has to do with spirits,

which, as such, are not concerned with morality; with gods which are

not ethical or ideal, and are not objects of worship in our sense of

the term.

Now, the spirits which, in the period of animism, are believed to

animate things, are not, it is true, concerned with morality; but then,

neither are they gods. To be a god a spirit must have a community of

worshippers; and it is as the protector of that community that he is

worshipped. He protects the community against any individual member

who violates the custom of the community. The custom of the community

constitutes the morality of the society. Offences against that custom

are offences against the god of the community. A god starts as an

ethical power, and as an object of worship.

Still, it may be argued, before gods were, before religion was evolved,

morality was; and this may be shown by the origin and nature of

justice, which throughout is entirely independent of religion and

religious {xxii} considerations. On this theory, the origin of justice

is to be found in the resentment of the individual. But, first, the

individual, apart from society, is an abstraction and an impossibility:

the individual never exists apart from but always as a member of some

society. Next, justice is not the resentment of any individual, but

the sentiment of the community, expressing itself in the action not of

any individual but of the community as such. The responsibility both

for the wrong done and for righting it rests with the community. The

earliest offences against which public action is taken are said to be

witchcraft and breaches of the marriage laws. The latter are not

injuries resented by any individual: they are offences against the gods

and are punished to avert the misfortunes which otherwise would visit

the tribe. Witchcraft is especially offensive to the god of the

community.

In almost, if not quite, the lowest stages of human development,

disease and famine are regarded as punishments which fall on the

community as a whole, because the community, in the person of one of

its members, has offended some supernatural power. In quite the lowest

stage the guilt of the offending member is also regarded as capable of

infecting the whole community; and he is, accordingly, avoided by the

whole community and tabooed. Taboo is due to the collective action,

and expresses the collective feeling of the community as a whole. It

is from such collective action and feeling that justice has been

evolved and not from individual resentment, which is still and always

was something different from justice. The offences punished by the

community have always been considered, so far as they are offences

against morality, to be offences against the gods of the community.

The fact that in course of time such offences come to be punished

always as militating against the good of society testifies merely to

the general assumption that the good of man is the will of God: men do

not believe that murder, adultery, etc., are merely offences {xxiii}

against man's laws. It is only by ignoring this patent fact that it

becomes possible to maintain that religion is built upon morality, and

that we are discovering religion to be a superfluous superstructure.

It may be argued that the assumption that murder, adultery, etc., are

offences against God's will is a mere assumption, and that in making

the assumption we are fleeing "to the bosom of faith." The reply is

that we are content not merely to flee but to rest there . . . 211-238

An Introduction to the Study of Comparative Religion · 第 20 / 37 题