The prisoners were charged with a conspiracy to violate the law, to

create insurrection, and to disturb the public peace. The inquiry

extended to a very great length, but the most interesting evidence was

that of one of the associates of the prisoners, named Samuel Powell

Thomson. He said, "I had been in Sheffield about three years in January

last. I became a member of the Secret Association the first or second

Sunday after the disturbance in Wales, some weeks before Christmas. I

belonged to a class held at Valentine Benison's, in the park. I attended

meetings from time to time there and at other places. There was a room

in Figtree-lane. There were two sorts of meetings, one a public

meeting, to which any one was admitted, the other a secret one for those

who were made members. I knew Samuel Holberry. I got acquainted with him

the latter end of August or the beginning of September. He attended the

meetings in Figtree-lane. I saw him on Sunday, the 5th of January; it

was at his own house. There were some other men I had seen at the

Chartist public meetings. Holberry said he had been to Dewsbury, and he

was happy to tell us that the day, and the hour, and the moment were

settled when a unanimous rise would take place, but only two people in

each town were to know the time. He had pledged his word, he said, that

no place of worship should be destroyed, and no provision stores. We

then went to the room in Figtree-lane, where there was a party of

members belonging to the Secret Association. Holberry repeated what he

had previously said, and said the time would be short, but he was not

allowed to make it known to any but two. He said he had another journey

to go, and would want some money. He had to go round by Nottingham and

that district. He mentioned Sutton and Ashfield. We began to make a

subscription of 10_s._ or 11_s._ I gave sixpence." The witness having

detailed the occurrences at subsequent meetings at which he was present,

and at which the quantity of arms in the possession of the conspirators

was calculated, went on to say:--"On the Saturday Boardman desired me to

come to the Figtree-lane room about three o'clock. I went and found

several men there, one of the name of Cooper. Samuel Holberry came; he

told us to follow him. We went to a public-house in Lambeth-street. We

went into the lodge-room up stairs. We found a person of the name of

M'Catterick and others. Holberry spoke; he stated that the first thing

to be done was for us all to assemble, and be at the Town-hall and

Tontine exactly as the clock struck two, as they were first to be taken.

That the classes were to come up to take them. One was to come up first

from every class, and then two, and then the whole body. Boardman said

he could bring about fifty. I said I could bring fifty. M'Catterick said

he could bring about forty. Duffy said he would bring sixty-four. The

Irishmen present began to talk about getting arms. It was decided that

they should go to the shops where weapons were exposed for sale, and

break them open. They were to shut the gates of the Tontine, and

barricade them with the coaches. In the Town-hall, one part was to

occupy the lower floor and the other the upper. They began to talk about

the "cats." It was decided that they should be thrown between the

barracks and the Tontine. Holberry said, that he and eight others would

go, after the soldiers were called out, and fire the straw chamber. One

was to climb the spout and throw a fire-ball into the straw-chamber.

They were also to fire the riding-school. The ones and twos who were to

come up first were to assassinate all the watchmen they met. We remained

in Lambert-street till nearly six o'clock. Holberry said they had agreed

as to what was to be done, but they had not agreed provided they were

put off. In that case they were to 'Moscow' the town. I was in company

with fourteen or sixteen belonging to my class. I took these men to

Burke's class, in Mill-lane. They were generally armed. William Wells

brought three daggers, and gave them to me; he wished the name to be

filed out. We remained at Burke's till two o'clock. Burke dipped some

torches in turpentine. A person came down from the council, which had

met at Lambert-street, and brought word we were to meet at the top of

Watery-lane. We set off thither, about twenty-four of us. We got there

near about three o'clock. We then came back to Tobacco-box-walk. We met

a few Irishmen of Duffy's class. They said they were seeking Duffy. I

accompanied them to Duffy's house. The people were armed with dirks, and

weapons of that sort; some with pistols. We then went to Burke's. We did

not find him at home. As I was coming from Burke's house to my father's

I was stopped by a policeman on the Ladies'-bridge, and taken to the

Town-hall. I have seen Booker at these meetings, I think on the Friday."

Cross-examined: I took a promise of secrecy. I remember the terms of it:

"Will you do all that lies in your power, even to the loss of your own

life, and the shedding of the blood of the tyrants?" That was the first

part. The person replies, "Yes." The second part was, "I do most

solemnly and sincerely promise, in the sight of Almighty God, and the

assembly here present, that I will assassinate any one who shall betray

the secrets of this meeting, and bear assassination if I should betray."

This was what I said; I revealed these secrets, but not till I was taken

as a prisoner. I consider the oath I have taken to-day binding on my

conscience. The witness was further cross-examined with a view to show

that he was unworthy of belief.

Several other persons were subsequently called, whose testimony was

corroborative of the statements which had been made, and the jury having

been addressed by the learned counsel for the several prisoners, a

verdict of "Guilty" was returned.

On the following day John Clayton, John Marshall, Thomas Penthorpe, and

Joseph Bennison, pleaded guilty to an indictment charging them with a

seditious conspiracy to procure arms and disturb the public peace in the

town of Sheffield, on the 12th of January; and William Martin was

convicted of uttering certain seditious words in the room in

Figtree-lane.

On the 18th of March the trial of the conspirators in custody for the

affair at Bradford took place.

Robert Peddie, William Brooke, Thomas Drake, James Holdsworth, and Paul

Holdsworth, were put to the bar charged with a seditious conspiracy to

oppose the law.

The most important evidence in this case was also that of an accomplice,

named James Harrison; and his testimony showed the implication of all

the prisoners in a plot to attack and burn the town. Peddie, who with

Marsden had come from Scotland, was to assume the whole command; and it

was agreed, that arms should be procured and other means taken to oppose

the constabulary and military forces. The statement of the witness as to

the arrangement for the attack was as follows:--

"They were to meet at the Green-market, as near two o'clock as possible,

but not later. When they got to the Green-market, they were to take

possession of the Bazaar and the Piece-hall for ammunition, and the

News-room was to be the depôt for the men. Peddie said they would soon

set the colliers to work, and make holes through the walls of the

News-room, to put the cannon through; and they were to get food and

clothes. After they had done with Bradford they were to take the cannon

and the baggage-carts with shoes, clothes, and provisions, and go to

Dewsbury. 'We shall gain strength,' he said, 'as we go; if we have five

hundred in the morning we shall have two thousand at night.' From

Dewsbury we were to make our way up to London. I went to the

Green-market a little after two o'clock. Peddie was there; George Flynn,

Isaac Holloway, and Paul and James Holdsworth. There were near thirty;

some had guns, some pistols, some pikes. Peddie had a belt with a pistol

and dagger. Peddie asked if I had seen Turner? I said I had not. Peddie

said 'I don't know what the man is doing to be so much out of his time.

I have had possession of the Green-market near half an hour. We have got

two watchmen prisoners,' and he pointed to the shed. I went across the

market to look at the watchmen. I saw Brook that night at the New Inn,

after I left the market. He was with another man, coming into the town.

He returned in about ten minutes. He asked me to take a walk through the

town, and see what was going on. On the way to the Court-house we met

some foot-soldiers; and at the Court-house the cavalry were coming out

of the yard. Brooke said 'It is a plain proof we're deceived, for the

magistrates know as much about it as we do ourselves.' We went down

towards New-street. We saw some people in the distance. Brooke said, 'I

have something about me; if these are constables I shall be taken.' We

were stopped, and Brooke was taken into custody. They searched me, and

let me go. I saw Paul Holdsworth on the Sunday evening, about nine

o'clock, in Nelson-street. I know Smith, an orange-seller. He lives down

a passage leading out of Nelson-street. Holdsworth was going there; he

had something in his hand like a brush-handle, about six feet long. He

was one of the sentries over the watchmen in the shed. James Holdsworth

was in the Green-market. He had a spear."

Other evidence was adduced, showing the intention of the Chartists to be

to secure the town; and that they had gone fully armed for the purpose

of attaining their object. Several of the witnesses admitted that they

were parties to the design, and that they were taken into custody; but

were subsequently induced to make a statement of the circumstances

within their knowledge.

For the defence it was argued that the whole story related, bore the

character of fabrication; and that none of the expressions imputed to

the prisoners, at all warranted the jury in coming to a conclusion that

they were guilty of sedition.

The jury, however, found a verdict of "Guilty." At the conclusion of the

assizes, the learned judge passed sentence upon the prisoners who had

been convicted:--

Samuel Holberry was sentenced to be imprisoned in the jail of

Northallerton for four years, and at the expiration of that period to be

bound, himself in 50_l._, and to find two sureties of 10_l._ each, to

keep the peace towards her Majesty's subjects. Thomas Booker, to be

imprisoned at Northallerton for three years, and to be bound, himself in

30_l._, and to find two sureties of 10_l._ each. William Booker, his

son, to be imprisoned two years at Northallerton, and to be bound in his

own recognizance in 20_l._, to keep the peace for two years. James

Duffy, three years in Beverley jail, and at the expiration of that

period to enter into his own recognizance of 20_l._, to keep the peace

for three years, and to find two sureties of 10_l._ each. William Wells,

one year's imprisonment, and at its expiration to enter into his own

recognizance of 20_l._ to keep the peace for one year. John Marshall,

Thomas Penthorpe, and Joseph Bennison, otherwise Benson, convicted of

riot, were sentenced to two years' imprisonment at Northallerton, and to

enter into their own recognizances of 20_l._ to keep the peace for two

years. William Martin, for using seditious language was sentenced to

twelve months' imprisonment, without hard labour, in the jail at

Northallerton.

Robert Peddie, William Brooke, Thomas Drake, and Paul Holdsworth, for

conspiracy, with intent to create riot at Bradford, were

sentenced--Peddie to be imprisoned in Beverley House of Correction for

three years, and to enter into his own recognizances for three years, in

the sum of 30_l._, and find two sureties of 10_l._ each. William Brooke,

three years' imprisonment in Northallerton House of Correction, and to

enter into his own recognizances of 30_l._ to keep the peace. Thomas

Drake, to be imprisoned in Beverley jail for eighteen months, and enter

into his own recognizances of 30_l._ for three years. Paul Holdsworth,

three years in Northallerton House of Correction, and the same

recognizances as Brooke.

John Walker, Joseph Naylor, John Riding, Phineas Smithies, Hutton, and

Rishworth, convicted of riot at Bradford, were sentenced to

imprisonment; Walker, Naylor, Riding, and Rishworth, for two years in

Wakefield House of Correction, and to enter into their own recognizances

of 30_l._ each, and Hutton and Smithies eighteen months in the same

place, recognizances 30_l._

In the course of the assizes many other convictions for sedition, for

seditious publications, and other offences of a like character, took

place.

At Monmouth, Henry Vincent and William Edwards, persons who were long

notorious for their opinions--the former of whom (as we have stated) had

already been convicted of an offence of a similar description, were

indicted for having conspired with John Frost, to subvert the

constituted authorities, and to alter, by force, the constitution of the

country.

The trial came on before Mr. Baron Gurney, on the 20th of March; the

case for the prosecution being conducted by Mr. Serjeant Talfourd, Mr.

Richards, and Mr. Whateley.

Several witnesses were called, whose testimony was adduced with a view

to show the nature of the language employed by the prisoners. Vincent

was the principal orator; but he was proved to have been supported by

Edwards and Frost. The tenor of his speech was condemnatory of the whole

course of proceeding of the government, with threats against both Whigs

and Tories; and it contained a declaration of the intention of the

Chartists to rise on the 6th of May in the year 1839 (the meeting being

held on the 1st of January), if the charter was not granted before then,

and send the ministers to "look for lodgings at New York."

The jury delivered a verdict of "Guilty;" but in consideration of the

long imprisonment which the defendants had already undergone,

recommended them to mercy.

They were sentenced, Edwards to fourteen months', and Vincent to twelve

months' imprisonment.

At Liverpool, on the 6th of April, R. W. Jackson, R. J. Richardson,

William Butterworth, and Bronterre O'Brien, were tried before Mr.

Justice Coleridge, on an indictment charging them with sedition.

The meeting at which the sedition was alleged to have been spoken, was

held on the 23rd of April, 1839, at Batty's Circus, Manchester,

pursuant to a placard which was posted through the streets. The four

defendants were there; and their speeches sufficiently indicated their

political opinions to be of the most violent description. Various

expressions were proved to have been used, by which the adoption of

force was recommended, and the jury found the prisoners "Guilty."

In the course of the ensuing three days, several other convictions for

sedition took place, at the same assizes, before the same learned judge.

Many prisoners, whose cases presented circumstances of a mitigating

character, were allowed by the government prosecutors to be discharged

upon recognizances to keep the peace; while others, who had been

convicted of being parties to riots, which had occurred at Wigan,

Bolton, and Ashton, were allowed to plead guilty, with a view to the

mitigation of their sentences.

On the 9th of April, Mr. Justice Coleridge passed sentence upon the

prisoners.

Richardson and Butterworth, who had long been known as connected with

the Chartists and their proceedings, were sentenced to be imprisoned in

Lancaster Castle for nine months, and at the expiration of that time, to

enter into their own recognizances in 100_l._, with two sureties in

50_l._ each, to keep the peace for three years. Upon Jackson being

placed at the bar, his lordship said "that it was a melancholy thing to

find a person of his station in society, attending such meetings as

those which had been referred to in the evidence. He was a minister of

religion, presiding over its services in a chapel where Christians met

for sacred worship; and yet he was found at a public meeting, using

language which one would have rather expected from the lips of one who

had been a follower of the camp, than a member of a sacred profession.

He had talked, if a constable came to his house to search for arms, of

presenting to him the sharp end of the pike, the muzzle of the gun, and

what came out of it. He must, in passing sentence, consider his station,

abilities, and power of injuring society." He was ordered to be

imprisoned for eighteen months, and to enter into his own recognizance

of 500_l._, with two sureties in 250_l._ each, to keep the peace for

three years.

Mr. O'Brien was next brought up. He was one of the most popular leaders

of the day, and was notorious for the active part which he had taken

throughout the whole of the proceedings of the Chartists. Upon his being

informed that a sentence of imprisonment would be passed upon him, he

implored the court rather to send him out of the country for life,

declaring that he had no hope of England in its present state. His

sentence was similar in its terms to that of Mr. Jackson.

Mr. Jackson was then sentenced to six months' further imprisonment on a

second indictment against him, and the following prisoners received the

judgments appended to their names for their participation in the

mischievous events which had recently before occurred.

George H. Smith, to be imprisoned in the House of Correction at Preston

for eighteen months, and to enter into his own recognizance in 500_l._,

with two sureties in 100_l._, to keep the peace for three years. John

Kaye, six months; recognizances in 200_l._, with two sureties in 50_l._

Christopher Doyle, nine months; recognizances in 300_l._, two sureties

in 100_l._ each. William Barker was sentenced to eighteen months'

imprisonment in the House of Correction at Kirkdale, with hard labour.

Frederick Davidson, six months, with hard labour. Samuel Scott, eight

months' imprisonment; to enter into his own recognizance in 100_l._,

with two sureties in 50_l._ each, to keep the peace for three years.

Charles Morris, twelve months' imprisonment; recognizances in 100_l._,

with two sureties in 20_l._ Daniel Ball, eighteen months' with hard

labour; similar recognizances. Peter Murdin, six months' imprisonment

with hard labour. William Willoughby, three months' with hard labour.

FEARGUS O'CONNOR, ESQ.

CONVICTED OF THE PUBLICATION OF A SEDITIOUS LIBEL.

The trial of Mr. Feargus O'Connor came on at York, before Mr. Justice

Coleridge, on the 17th of March 1840, when the Attorney-general appeared

to conduct the prosecution on the part of the crown. The information

charged the publication of two seditious libels in a newspaper called

the "Northern Star," of which the defendant was proprietor and editor,

upon the 13th and 20th of July in the preceding year.

The Chronicles of Crime or The New Newgate Calendar. v. 2/2 being a series of memoirs and anecdotes of notorious characters who have outraged the laws of Great Britain from the earliest period to 1841 · 第 76 / 90 段