The Lord Chief Justice began to sum up at a quarter past six o'clock on

the second day of the trial. Having recapitulated the terms of the

indictment in form, his lordship proceeded to observe, that the

conviction of the prisoner Greenacre of murder or manslaughter would not

necessarily involve the prisoner Gale in the charge, unless the jury

were satisfied that the evidence was sufficient to bear out the

allegation of her having been an accomplice in the transactions

connected with the death of the deceased. He had no doubt the case would

receive the most benevolent and patient attention of the jury. He would

read over the evidence, and leave them to say whether they considered

the prisoner Greenacre to have been the author of the woman's death, and

whether the evidence amounted to proof of murder, or of manslaughter of

an aggravated kind. There were certain undoubted principles of law which

must be kept in mind. One was, that where a person met his death from

the hand of another person, that other person was bound, either by

direct evidence or out of the circumstances of the case as they appeared

in evidence before the jury, to mitigate or reduce the charge to the

lower or minor class of offence. But then some circumstance of

alleviation, mitigation, excuse, or justification must be brought before

the court and jury, or be derivable by fair inference from the

evidence. What they would have to say, therefore, whether, looking at

the whole of the case, they were satisfied that it was left on the broad

ground on which it was started by the counsel for the prosecution--namely,

the actual murder of the deceased individual, or whether there were any

circumstances in the case to induce them to come to a conclusion of a

milder character--namely, that of a felonious manslaughter or accidental

homicide. The learned judge then proceeded to refer to the evidence

which had been adduced, commenting with great minuteness and perspicuity

upon every circumstance from which the guilt or innocence of the

prisoners was argued. He observed that the male prisoner had, by his own

statement, admitted that he was guilty of manslaughter, unless they came

to the conclusion that by an act of carelessness, or of playfulness in

tilting up the chair, the woman had met her death. If, on the other

hand, they were of opinion that the prisoner had occasioned the death of

Hannah Brown, either by premeditated malice or by a malignity of

feeling, caused by conduct of an exasperating nature, thereby giving

rise to a spirit of revenge, then they must find him guilty of the

higher offence. They would observe that the doctors had given it as

their opinion, that the knife had been applied to the neck during life;

they would therefore have to say whether, being possessed of a malignant

spirit, the prisoner had not taken the knife and completed that act

which he had wickedly intended to effect. He would exhort them to weigh

well the circumstances of the case, which was one of extreme difficulty.

Above all things, it behoved them to turn a deaf ear to any

manifestations of clamour which might have been exhibited on the part of

the public; such impressions ought at all times, but more especially

upon an occasion like the present, to be banished from a court of

justice. They would enter upon the performance of their solemn and

painful duty with feelings of patience and calmness, giving to every

portion of the evidence such favourable interpretation as it would

allow, and they would give any benefit which might arise therefrom to

the prisoners; they would look into all the evidence watchfully and

narrowly, and if upon mature reflection they entertained a doubt of the

guilt of the prisoner of the charge of murder, they would let him derive

the full advantage and benefit of such a doubt. If, on the other hand,

the evidence was so clear and satisfactory as that in their minds it

brought the commission of the crime home to the prisoner, they would

doubtless do their duty. With respect to the other prisoner, Sarah Gale,

if they found the male prisoner guilty, either of the crime of murder or

manslaughter, they would say whether by her assistance and aid she had

protected, comforted, and enabled him to screen himself from the justice

of the country. If so, they would find her guilty of the charge for

which she was indicted. If, on the other hand, they thought that she had

not in any way acted as an accessory, and had had no guilty knowledge of

the crime, then they would give her the benefit of such opinion, and

return a verdict of acquittal.

The jury having retired from the box for the purpose of considering

their verdict, after an absence of a quarter of an hour only, returned

into court to deliver their decision upon the case. As they passed to

their box, Greenacre surveyed each of them with a keen, searching, and

eager glance, as if to read in their expressions the fate which awaited

him, and of which the jury were now the arbiters. His countenance,

however, remained unchanged; and he still appeared to preserve the same

degree of firmness and self-possession which distinguished his

demeanour throughout the whole of the trial, and seemed as a man who had

already anticipated his fate, and whose mind was made up to the worst

that could befall him. The prisoner Gale, on the contrary, seemed lost

and bewildered, and almost unconscious of her awful situation: but with

that feeling of attachment for her paramour which women will evince even

under circumstances of misery, shame, and peril, she fixed her look

during this painful interval of suspense and agony upon the countenance

of him to whose fate she appeared to cling, even in this trying moment,

when life or death was about to unite them once more, or sever their

unfortunate connexion for ever.

The clerk of the arraigns having called over the names of the jury,

said, "Gentlemen, how say you; do you find the prisoner at the bar,

James Greenacre, guilty or not guilty of the felony of murder with which

he is charged?"

The foreman of the jury answered, "Guilty."

The question was then asked with regard to the prisoner Gale, and the

foreman of the jury again answered "Guilty."

The countenance of Greenacre remained unaltered. He exhibited no

emotion, but leaned back in his chair and seemed perfectly indifferent

to what might follow. Gale appeared almost unconscious of what was

passing around her.

Upon the announcement of the result of the case outside the Court, the

huzzaings of the crowd, who were impatiently awaiting its termination,

were of the most deafening description; and several well-dressed persons

were observed in elevated positions, waving their hats to the mob, as if

upon the intelligence of some important victory.

The recent alteration in the law with regard to the period of the

execution of murderers, rendered it unnecessary that sentence should be

immediately passed on the prisoners; but on the following day, the 12th

of April, they were brought up to receive the judgment of the Court.

Upon their being called upon in the usual way, to say any thing they had

to urge why sentence should not be pronounced upon them:

Greenacre (in a husky, but firm tone) said--"My Lord, my unhappy

condition in this unfortunate affair has given rise to abundance of

evidence against me, such as might be collected in any pot-house or

gin-shop, owing to the reports spread abroad to my prejudice, upon which

the jurymen have acted. It is contrary to reason and common sense to

suppose that I should have meditated the death of the woman, much less

that I should effect it in the manner described, because of the property

she had. If that had been my object, I could have had it all on the next

morning, when our marriage was to have taken place, and then it would

have been mine. What, then, was my motive for murdering of her? It is--"

The Recorder.--"This is all very proper matter to have been urged by

your counsel at the trial, but should not be pressed upon the Court now.

The only question now is, as to the matter of law. If there are the

slightest grounds for questioning the verdict of the jury, your only

course is to apply to the Secretary of State, the Court having no power

of itself to interfere. Have you anything more to say?"

Greenacre.--"In the next place, my lord, I beg to say that this woman

was utterly ignorant of the affair up to the time of my being taken to

the police-office. She had no knowledge whatever of it, and is as

innocent as any lady or gentleman in this court. This I say, as I am

going into my grave--that she is innocent. I invited her back to the

house after the body was removed, and she never knew anything of it. I

deem it a religious duty to exculpate her from having any concern in

this unfortunate affair. I have no more to say."

The Recorder.--"I shall make the same observation to you, Gale, that I

have just addressed to the other prisoner. If there be any ground for a

further inquiry into your case, you must apply to the Secretary of

State, who will exercise his best discretion upon the subject, under the

advice of the responsible officers of the crown."

The prisoner Gale was then led to a chair at the back of the dock, and

the usual proclamation for silence, preparatory to the passing of the

sentence of death, having been made,--

The Recorder, in a solemn and impressive tone, proceeded to address the

male prisoner in the following words:--"James Greenacre, after a

protracted trial, which endured for two entire days, upon a patient and

impartial investigation of all the circumstances connected with your

case, a jury of your country have found themselves inevitably compelled

to find you guilty of the dreadful offence for which you were indicted.

You have been convicted upon evidence, indeed the most satisfactory, of

the crime of wilful murder. The appalling details of your dreadful case

must be fresh in the recollection of all who now hear my voice, and will

long live in the memory and (may I not add?) in the execration of

mankind; and generations yet to come will shudder at your guilt. You

have, indeed, acquired for yourself a revolting celebrity: an odious

notoriety in the annals of cruelty and crime. The means to which you

were prompted to resort, in order to conceal the mangled and dismembered

portions of your victim, were for a season attended with partial

success. You disposed of her remains, as you thought, in places secure

from discovery, but that course availed you not; for after a short

interval accumulated evidence and irrefragable proofs of your guilty

contrivance became apparent. The amputated limbs and the dissevered body

were united to the bloodless head of the murdered woman, and every

injury by you inflicted after death has afforded the means of proving by

comparison, beyond doubt, that the wound on the eye was inflicted by you

while your victim was in life, and strength, and health. Horrible and

revolting to humanity as was the spectacle presented by the mutilated

trunk and mangled remains, fresh details and discoveries suggested both

the means and manner by which you accomplished the destruction of the

deceased. Both surgical skill and medical science came to the assistance

of common observation; and it was clearly and beyond all doubt

demonstrated that the wounds on the eye and skull were sufficient to

produce death; and it was still further proved, that while the blood was

yet in a fluid state, and circulating through the veins and arteries,

you accomplished your horrible object, by severing the head from the

body. Stupor of the senses and suspended animation were the effect of

your blows; and then you embrued your hands in the gushing life's-blood

of the wretched and unhappy being who was stretched senseless and

unconscious at your feet. The still warm corpse was then barbarously

mutilated and mangled by you, in the hope that the eye of man would not

detect your guilt: but the eye of God was upon you. The natural disgust

and horror which your conduct in this respect excites, compels me to

throw a veil over the frightful and appalling particulars of that

hideous scene. But even that scene, revolting as it is, may be useful in

a moral point of view, for it shows how the hand of Providence points

out the guilty, and proves both the means of detection and the certainty

of punishment. The certain but unseen agency of Providence is exhibited

in the development of the peculiar and complicated circumstances of your

case. The curiosity excited, the alarm produced, and the peculiarity of

each succeeding discovery of the mangled members of the body, and the

seemingly impenetrable mystery in which the circumstances of such a

murder were shrouded, all conspired to awaken suspicion, renew inquiry,

and incite to fresh exertion, until at last the mystery was developed by

the family of the deceased. The embalmed head was identified, the name

of the murdered woman came to light, and sufficient evidence was

produced to point out you as the author of her death, and bring you

before the tribunal of public justice. The circumstances attending the

discovery of this murder lead to the inevitable conclusion that neither

cunning nor ferocity can shelter and secure a murderer; for although the

crime may be hidden for a time--although delays may occur, and the

mystery of the transaction almost preclude the hope of its discovery,

yet the all-seeing eye of God is cognizant of the deed, and man becomes

the agent of its discovery. Indeed, instances of escape from such a

crime are so rare, that the detection is almost as sure as the

punishment is certain. It is plain from the attention with which I

perceive you are listening to what I now say, that I am addressing an

individual not devoid of education, of reasoning faculties, and strength

of mind. The occasion you must indeed be aware is, as regards yourself,

standing where you do, and under the circumstances in which you are

placed, awful and solemn to the last degree, both as regards your fate

in this world and the world to come. I will not draw arguments from my

own feeble resources alone, to endeavour to induce and implore you to

repent before it is too late. Let me, then, before I proceed to pass

upon you the dreadful sentence, entreat you to consider well your past

life, and the chances which await you in the life which is to come. In

making this last appeal, in attempting to revive within your breast the

last remaining sparks of virtue and religion, let me refer you to an

extract which I am about to read to you from an excellent work, called

'The Analogy of Religion, Natural and Revealed.' I have selected the

passage because I think it may be applicable to your present state of

mind, and because the sentiments it conveys are far better than I could

ever hope to address to you from my own resources. The passage is as

follow:--'Indeed,' says the learned author, 'when one has been

recollecting the proper proofs of a future state of rewards and

punishment, nothing, methinks, can give one so sensible an apprehension

of the latter or representation of it to the mind, as observing the many

disregard-checks, admonitions, and warnings which people meet with in

the ways of vice and folly, and extravagance--warnings from their very

nature, from the example of others, from the lesser inconveniences which

they bring upon themselves--from the instruction of wise and virtuous

men; after these had been so long despised, scorned, ridiculed--after

the chief bad consequences, temporal consequences of their follies, have

been delayed for a great while, at length they break in irresistibly

like an armed force--repentance is too late to relieve, and can serve

only to aggravate their distress: the case is become desperate, and

poverty and sickness, remorse and anguish, infamy and death--the effects

of their own doings--overwhelm them beyond the possibility of remedy or

escape.' The limits of time and the span of this present life furnish no

obstacles in the way of a repentant sinner. Turn, therefore, I implore

you, with an humble and penitent heart, to the source of all hope and

mercy--the blessed Redeemer of mankind, and employ the brief interval

which is yet left you on this side of eternity in penitence and prayer,

as the only means of obtaining that mercy hereafter which the laws of

God and man deny to you in this world. It now only remains for me to

pass upon you the dreadful sentence of the law; and that sentence is,

that you be taken from hence to the prison from which you came, and from

thence to a place of execution, where you shall be hanged by the neck

until you are dead, and that your body be then buried within the

precincts of the jail; and may the Lord God Almighty take compassion on

your sinful soul."

The learned Recorder towards the end of this address was sensibly

affected; and he could scarcely give utterance to the concluding words.

The prisoner Greenacre remained apparently unmoved, but he listened with

attention, and never once changed his position or relaxed a muscle. He

was then led back, and

Gale was brought forward to receive her sentence.

The Recorder said--"Sarah Gale, I will not aggravate the sufferings

which you must now endure with any observations tending to increase

those sufferings. The unhappy man who a short time ago stood beside you

at that bar has declared that you had no guilty knowledge of the

transaction in which he was involved. I cannot but observe, however,

with regard to that remark, that you had united yourself to him, sharing

his society and bed, and comforting, assisting, and sheltering him,

without being joined to him by any moral or religious tie. As he has

stated that you were ignorant of the dreadful transaction, I think it

right to remind you that the ear-rings found in your pocket had belonged

to the unfortunate woman who had been slaughtered by his hands; that

duplicates of property which belonged to her were also found in your

possession; and that in an adjoining room a box was found, proved to

have been hers, besides other property. I cannot, therefore, as at

present advised, entertain any doubt but that the verdict of the jury in

your case was well and justly grounded. How far your attachment to the

prisoner induced you to continue your intercourse with him,

notwithstanding his possession of the property of the deceased under

circumstances which I should think must at least have excited suspicion

on your mind, it is not for me to judge. Perhaps you considered that

what had been done could not be undone; but whatever feeling actuated

your conduct in connexion with the circumstances of the case, I feel

that I am bound to pass upon you the full sentence directed by the act

of parliament; and if upon further investigation of your case, should

you be disposed to apply to the Secretary of State for a revision of

your sentence, any favourable circumstances should arise, that matter

will be considered and disposed of by the competent authorities. At

present I have only to pronounce upon you the sentence of the law; and

that sentence is, and this Court do adjudge, that you be transported

beyond the sea to such place as His Majesty, with the advice of his

privy council, shall direct and appoint, for the term of your natural

life."

The prisoners were then led away from the bar; but Greenacre, instead of

being conducted to the condemned cell, as is customary, was re-taken to

the apartment which he had previously occupied. The reason for this

alteration in his case, was the necessity which existed for a strict

watch being maintained over him, to prevent a repetition of the attempt

which he had made upon his own life, which there was good reason to

apprehend; and it was felt that the inclemency of the weather would

render such a duty in the lower cells of the prison, a punishment upon

the attendant turnkeys of no ordinary severity. The demeanour of

Greenacre, after his conviction, partook of the same firmness and

determination which he had hitherto maintained; and upon the day after

his condemnation he requested to be supplied with pens, ink, and paper.

His desire was instantly complied with; and from this time he appeared

to be occupied in the fabrication of a new statement, bearing the

impress of truth, in reference to the foul crime for which he had been

tried. He industriously applied himself for several days to this task;

but none of the productions of his pen appeared to afford him

satisfaction, and each was committed to the flames almost immediately

upon its completion. In the course of the day after he received sentence

of death, he was visited by the sheriffs, and to them he made a new

confession of the circumstances of his crime. The general facts which he

now detailed corresponded with the story he had told at the

police-office; but in one most important particular he admitted the

falsehood of that statement. This was with reference to the immediate

cause of the death of Mrs. Brown; and he now stated that the unfortunate

woman, having accompanied him home, as proved in evidence, they had

taken tea together. Mrs. Brown afterwards proceeded to wash up the

tea-things, and while she was so occupied, they continued a conversation

which had before commenced, upon the subject of her property. He became

enraged at the deception which she had practised on him, and seizing a

rolling-pin which lay on the dresser, he menaced her with it, and at

length struck her on the eye. She fell to the ground, and on his going

to her, he was shocked to find that she was insensible, and apparently

dead. He paced the room for some time, in terror at the act which he had

committed, as he conjectured that he should be charged as her murderer,

and began to reflect upon the best means of screening himself from the

consequences of his guilt. A variety of methods presented themselves to

his mind; but at length he hit upon the horrible expedient of dividing

the limbs from the body, and disposing of the dissevered members

separately. He, in consequence, immediately set about cutting off the

head, and having done so, he suffered the whole of the blood to drain

from it. This done, he determined instantly to get rid of this portion

of the frame of his victim, and wrapping it in a silk pocket-handkerchief,

he quitted the house with the horrible burden. On reaching Camberwell he

got into an omnibus, which conveyed him to Gracechurch-street, and

without alarm for the discovery of the contents of his bundle, he

carried it on his knee during the whole journey. When he left the

vehicle he scarcely knew which way to turn, but a Mile-End omnibus

overtaking him as he reached Cornhill, he jumped into it, and was

conveyed to the East end of the town, still carrying his dreadful load

on his lap, in the same manner in which he had supported it before. On

his leaving this second conveyance, he walked on until he reached the

Regent's Canal, and he pursued the course of it, until he came to the

Lock at Stepney. An idea suddenly suggested itself to his mind, that

this was the fitting place to get rid of the head, and without more ado

he "shot it from the handkerchief into the water." He then directly

turned back, and on his way home he called at Mrs. Davis's, in

Bartholomew-close, with whom he entered into conversation, as described

in the evidence. He slept in Carpenter's-buildings alone on that night,

out on the morning he went to Mrs. Gale's lodgings, where he staid until

the next day. At an early hour on the morning of the 26th of December,

he proceeded to his own house, to dispose of the remaining parts of the

body. He began by separating the legs from the trunk, and having done

so, he packed them up in a sack and took them to Cold Harbour-lane (it

being quite daylight at the time), and threw them into the osier bed. He

then once more resumed his dreadful task at his house, in

Carpenter's-buildings, the trunk of the body being now all that he had

to get rid of. The sack and the remnants of a gown which were discovered

with the body, were the only coverings in which he could wrap these

remains, and having securely corded them up, he took the bundle on his

back and went out, undetermined as to the course which he should pursue

to dispose of this remaining evidence of his guilt. A carrier's cart

passed him soon after he reached the public road, and his load being

heavy, he requested permission to place it on the tail-board. This was

acceded to, and he walked behind the cart as far as the Elephant and

Castle, at Newington. The carrier there stopped to procure his dinner,

and left him in the street to take care of the cart; but alarmed lest,

during the prolonged absence of the driver, some accident might occur

which should procure his detection, he called a hackney cab, and having

thrown his bundle under the seat, directed that he should be driven to

the Edgeware-road. On his arrival at the Pine Apple Gate, he quitted the

vehicle, and paid the driver, and the man having turned back, he walked

on towards Kilburn. A favourable opportunity soon presented itself for

disposing of the load, and he deposited it behind the stone in the

position in which it was found two days afterwards. This, also, he

declared took place in the day-time, and he conceived that he underwent

less risk in pursuing his operations thus openly, than in endeavouring

to conceal them under the shades of night. On his return home, he burned

the handkerchief in which he had carried the head, and he also wiped up

the blood from the floor with flannels, which he disposed of by throwing

them down the privy. This confession was not reduced to writing; but the

evident object of the prisoner was to screen Mrs. Gale from the

punishment which awaited her, and to raise a belief of her innocence.

This, however, failed, for the evidence which was adduced with reference

to her implication in the murder, was too clear to admit of any doubt

being entertained; and indeed the general impression was, that the

murder was the result of a pre-conceived determination, both of

Greenacre and his paramour, in order to the accomplishment of which by

the former, the latter only temporarily quitted his house. During the

subsequent imprisonment of Greenacre, he appeared to be little anxious

for the spiritual consolation of the reverend gentleman, who was the

ordinary of the jail. He occasionally employed himself in the perusal of

religious works, but was generally engaged in writing, although the

result of his labours in this respect were, as we have already stated,

usually burned. In the conversations which he had with the official

persons, by whom he was visited, he complained loudly of the prejudices

which had been excited against him by the circulation of a great many

false accounts of circumstances which had occurred in his early life. He

particularly referred to an allegation which had been made, of his

having murdered one of his children, of which Mrs. Gale was the mother;

and he asserted, and Mrs. Gale corroborated the truth of his

declaration, upon her being separately questioned, that the child had

died a natural death; although he admitted that he had disposed of it,

by placing it at the door of a Mr. Dale, in Rupert-street, Haymarket, by

whom it was sent to St. James's Workhouse, where it lived for nine

months.

The Chronicles of Crime or The New Newgate Calendar. v. 2/2 being a series of memoirs and anecdotes of notorious characters who have outraged the laws of Great Britain from the earliest period to 1841 · 第 62 / 90 段