He then made for Annan, and reached that place before the alarm had

spread so far; but while lying concealed in a haystack, where he slept

during the night, he learned from a woman, who was conversing with a

boy, that Morrin was dead. He proceeded on his flight, as soon as he

conceived that a good opportunity was afforded, and disguised in some

clothes, which he took from a scarecrow, he at length succeeded in

reaching Newcastle, where he considered himself safe. Having there seen,

and narrowly escaped being apprehended by a police-officer, who he knew

was acquainted with his person, he again set out on his way from

detection and reached Edinburgh in safety. Here he continued during a

considerable period, and never ventured out unless in disguise; but

having at length attracted the attention of a constable, who he was

persuaded recognised him, he determined to quit so dangerous a vicinity;

and, having gone round by the north and west of Scotland, to go to

Ireland. The attraction of Edinburgh was too strong for him, however,

and he once again entered that city before paying his proposed visit to

the sister Kingdom; but he was again scared away, by his seeing bills

posted up offering a large reward for his apprehension. At Dunkeld,

Dundee, Kenmore, and Cupar-Fife, which he visited in succession, he was

successful in obtaining considerable booties, and he at length

prosecuted his intended journey to Ireland; but having landed at

Belfast, he was there seized on suspicion of being the escaped murderer

from Dumfries, upon the information of one Robert Platt, who had been in

that jail at the same time with him. Assuming a rich brogue, and

asserting that he was a native of Armagh, he somewhat puzzled the

magistrates, but notwithstanding his deceit, they were little disposed

to part with him so easily. He was therefore committed to the custody of

two yeomen, but having plied them plentifully with drink, he watched his

opportunity, and giving them the slip, he jumped out at the window and

once again obtained his liberty. Dublin was his next point, and there he

fell in with a pickpocket, named O'Brien, and they agreed to go in

company. On the quay of Dublin they saw some persons looking at a number

of horses just arrived in a vessel from England; and amongst others, a

man whose dress and appearance bespoke poverty and meanness. Haggart was

not a little surprised to hear him offer eighteen guineas for a horse,

and immediately began speculating on what part of his person this sum

might be deposited. After some experiment, he found it in a greasy coat

pocket, which hung behind unprotected, the frail duffle of his coat

having given way to the rough hand of time, and having made prize of the

purse, it proved to contain ninety-five guineas in gold, beside

bank-notes. A few days afterwards, they took fifty-four pounds at the

theatre door; after which they changed their dress, and, in company with

two girls, hired a jaunting car, and a boy to drive them, and took a

tour through the counties of Fermanagh, Cavan, and Derry. They were a

month on their excursion, and spent upwards of 190_l._ On their return,

being much reduced, Haggart started for King's county on foot, leaving

his clothes in Dublin.

At Mullinger market he picked a farmer's pocket, and would have been

apprehended, but for the connivance of a constable. At Tullamore fair he

picked the pocket of a pig-drover, who afterwards accused him of the

fact, but Haggart having concealed the property very securely, took a

high ground, and insisted on his going before a magistrate for the

accusation and assault. The poor drover was outwitted, and, alarmed lest

he should get into further trouble, he apologised and was permitted to

go.

It was Haggart's fate to commit only one more robbery, which was at a

fair near Downpatrick, for which he was instantly apprehended and

committed to the county jail to await his trial at the next assizes. The

society and practices of this place it appears were horrible beyond

description. Having received their supply of provisions for three days,

the male prisoners blocked out the jailors, by digging up the stones of

the floor, and placing them against the door, and then they broke their

way to the wretched women in confinement, with whom they remained two

days, giving way to every kind of wickedness. After spending this time

in the most riotous manner, they were secured. Haggart was locked up

closely in his cell, and kept in confinement till the day of trial. On

the 29th March he was arraigned, and after a trial, in which it is

evident that he was mistaken by the learned judge for some other person,

and in which the judge himself offered to give evidence, that he had

been before convicted before him; he was found guilty and sentenced to

seven years' transportation. On his being carried back to the jail, he

was recognised to be the man who had escaped from Belfast, and removed

to Kilmainham jail, and there loaded with fetters. He soon thought of

making his escape by digging through the back wall, with the assistance

of several others, having first secured the entrance of their apartment;

but some of the prisoners gave information, and Haggart being the first

man who made his appearance through the hole, he got a severe blow; the

others rushed after him, but having still a high wall to get over, they

were all secured by a party of soldiers, and locked up in their cells.

He was subsequently guilty of some other misconduct in being insolent,

and otherwise infringing upon the rules of the prison, in consequence of

which he was handcuffed, and confined with a horrible iron instrument

fitted on his head, from the front bar of which an iron tongue entered

his mouth and prevented his speaking. This, which was certainly an

arbitrary and cruel exercise of power, excited only opposition, and the

moment it was removed, the prisoner took his seat on the window of his

cell, and remained there during the rest of the day, singing the most

profane songs he could think of. Even the fear of the iron helmet of

Kilmainham could not keep him quiet.

But something awaited him far worse, and which, had he known, would have

made his heart tremble, hard and wicked as it was. Next morning the

prisoners, consisting of some hundreds, were taken down into a yard, and

ranked in companies of twenty each. In a few minutes, John Richardson,

the police officer from Scotland, made his appearance, accompanied by

the two jailors and turnkey; a terrific sight to Haggart! He passed

through all the ranks, and the second time stopped, and taking Haggart's

hand, said, "Do you know me, David?" He again attempted to escape by the

assumption of the Irish brogue, but it was of no avail. He was too well

known, and being taken to the condemned cell, he was there loaded with

irons, and subsequently carried off to Scotland. An iron belt was fixed

round his waist, with his wrists pinioned to each side of it; a chain

passed from the front of the belt, and joined the centre of a chain,

each end of which was padlocked round his ancles, and a chain passed

from each wrist to each ancle. In this dreadful (but by his own hardened

and daring conduct necessary) state of torture and confinement, he was

conducted to Dumfries. The officers treated him with the utmost

tenderness and humanity, but he obstinately kept up his pretended

ignorance for a considerable time.

On their approach towards Dumfries, which was in the dark, there were

many thousands of people on the road, many of them with torches in their

hands, waiting his arrival; and at the jail it was scarcely possible to

get him out of the coach for the multitude, all crowding for a sight of

Haggart, the murderer. Some discovered sorrow, and some terror; but

whose could equal his own? He plunged through them all, rattling his

chains, and making a great show of courage, but he afterwards owned that

his heart was shaken at the thought of poor Morrin. As he went up the

stairs to the cells, he had to pass the very spot where he struck him;

"and oh!" confessed the guilty murderer, "it was like fire to my feet!"

After remaining at Dumfries three weeks, where the greater part of his

Irish irons were removed, he was carried to Edinburgh, to be tried for

the murder, with which he stood charged. He was immediately found guilty

upon satisfactory evidence, and ordered for execution. During the next

fortnight he exhibited the utmost indifference for his condition; but at

length he was brought to a just sense of the manifold wickednesses of

which he had been guilty; and he declared on the morning of his

execution that he would not wish to escape, if the prison doors were

open, as his death was the only atonement he could make in this world

for his violations of the laws of God and man.

Early on the morning of his execution, Haggart joined earnestly in

devotional exercise with his ministerial attendant. After the chaplain

of the jail had prayed, one of the officers of justice appeared, and

requested all strangers to retire, as he had something to communicate to

the unhappy prisoner. Haggart immediately exclaimed, in a hurried tone,

"Oh! I suppose it is the executioner." His firmness for a moment

abandoned him, and he walked rapidly across the cell with his arms

folded, and with deep despair strongly painted on his countenance. He

speedily, however, regained his composure; and when the executioner did

appear, at once allowed his arms to be bound. He was then removed to a

hall in the lower part of the lock-up-house, where he was received by

two of the clergymen of Edinburgh and the magistrates. After prayers the

procession proceeded to the scaffold. The conduct of the unfortunate

youth there was in the highest degree becoming. While the beneficial

influence of religion was apparent in his whole demeanour, his natural

firmness of character never for a moment forsook him. He kneeled down,

and uttered an earnest prayer; and after addressing a few words of deep

and anxious exhortation to the great multitude by whom he was

surrounded, he met his fate with the same intrepidity which

distinguished all the actions of his short, but guilty and eventful

life, having just completed his twentieth year. He was executed at

Edinburgh, July the 18th, 1821.

Haggart, after his condemnation, wrote the history of his short and

wicked life, which was subsequently published for the benefit of his

father, who he requested might receive any profit arising from it, for

the purpose of educating his younger brothers and sisters. The foregoing

particulars are taken from this singular auto-biography, which evinced a

strong, though uncultivated mind, which, if it had been directed to

laudable pursuits, could not have failed to place the writer in an

honorable station in society.

DANIEL DOODY, JOHN CUSSEN, _alias_ WALSH, JAMES LEAHY, MAURICE LEAHY,

WILLIAM DOODY, DAVID LEAHY, DANIEL RIEDY, WILLIAM COSTELLO, AND WALTER

FITZMAURICE, _alias_ CAPTAIN ROCK,

CONVICTED OF ABDUCTION.

It was the opinion of Dr. Johnson that many of the romantic tales of the

middle ages had their origin in truth, and that the absolute distress of

females might, in all probability, have called for the institution of

"knight errantry." To protect the defenceless is a natural impulse,

which has its foundation in the sympathies of our nature; but when a

female, young, beautiful, and innocent, is the victim of oppression,

there is no man, with common feelings, who would not risk his life to

snatch her from despair and misery. In this happy country there are few

instances of abduction; but in Ireland this unmanly crime is too

prevalent. The disturbed state of certain parts of the country gives aid

to the schemes of unprincipled ruffians, acting on the presumption that

injured females, when degraded and dishonoured, would, of necessity,

save the violators of their innocence from ignominy by a marriage--the

only means, they suppose, left them to escape from unmerited shame. The

persons thus forcibly carried away are generally the daughters of

opulent farmers--a fact which clearly shows the mercenary views of

those who commit so base and cowardly an outrage on the most defenceless

part of the creation.

Among the numerous outrages of this nature was one on the person of Miss

Honora Goold, a young lady remarkable for her personal beauty. She lived

in the house of her mother at Glangurt, in the county of Cork, and had

two sisters older than herself, she being scarcely sixteen, and a

brother. On the 4th of March 1822, about twelve o'clock at night, their

dwelling was attacked by an armed banditti, who, on threatening to burn

the house, were admitted. One of the ferocious ruffians burst into Miss

Honora's apartment, and asked if she was the eldest Miss Goold. She

replied in the negative, and said that her sister was on a visit in

Cork. The inquirer then withdrew, and having searched several other

apartments, returned, followed by five or six others, and repeated his

interrogations, but on this occasion answered them himself in the

affirmative, and then ordered her to rise and dress herself, and to

accompany them. At the suggestion of one of the party, they withdrew

from the room; but Miss Goold was scarcely dressed when they returned;

and one of them seizing her round the waist, carried her screaming to

the outside of the house, where she was received by a stranger on

horseback. She was placed in front of the horseman, and then the party,

in spite of her cries and entreaties, set off in the direction of the

Galties, a range of hills between the counties of Cork and Limerick. At

the distance of several miles they halted, and there, having procured a

pillion, their captive was compelled to ride behind the leader of this

atrocious band. In her eagerness to escape she fell several times during

their progress; and having continued her screams all the time, one of

the ruffians threatened to murder her unless she desisted.

By daylight they had entered the recesses of the Galties; and several of

the party having occasionally dropped off, she was conducted by the few

that remained to the house of David Leahy, a substantial farmer.

The leader of this outrage was a young man named Brown, of a respectable

family, and who had received an education which should have rendered him

incapable of such base and unmanly conduct. The elder Miss Goold was

entitled, on her marriage, to a large fortune; and Brown, hoping to

possess himself of it, resolved to carry off the young lady. Being

disappointed by the precipitancy and mistake of his assistants, he

determined to make sure of the lovely victim who had fallen into his

power, knowing that the opulence of her family could make him

independent, provided he could insure the consent of the astonished girl

he had forcibly carried off. With virtuous indignation, however, she

repulsed his advances, and begged the protection of Mrs. Leahy, in whose

parlour she now was; but, strange to say, this woman, who was herself a

mother, connived at the ruin of her unprotected guest.

Foiled in his direct attack, Brown had recourse to an expedient which,

for the honour of human nature, we would wish never to record, did not

impartial justice demand an honest discharge of our duty as faithful

narrators of criminal occurrences. It was proposed, immediately after

breakfast, that Miss Goold should take some rest. A bed was in the

parlour, and she was directed to repose upon it. This, indeed, after the

fatigue of the night, was most desirable; but to her utter astonishment,

the family in which were two females, left the room, at the same time

locking the

[Illustration: _Abduction of Miss Goold._

P. 66.]

door upon herself and Brown. The monster, in spite of her entreaties and

screams, proceeded to undress her, and insisted on lying beside her. The

reader need not be told the rest--the purity of female innocence was

grossly violated in the person of this young and lovely creature; and

her destroyer arose from his bed of lust, the polluter of one whose

peace of mind neither the world's sympathy nor the world's wealth could

restore.

The friends of Miss Goold, who comprised the wealth and respectability

of the county of Cork, instantly set about recovering the injured lady.

The pursuit was continued from day to day for three weeks; and the

vigilance of her friends was only evaded by her being removed from house

to house, and from cabin to cabin; and even once, by her being exposed

for a whole day and night to the inclemency of the weather on a bleak

mountain, when she had the agony of seeing her friends at a distance,

but was prevented from calling to them, or flying to join them, by a

ruffian, who stood sentinel over her with a loaded pistol. At length,

however, her sufferings were to be terminated. Though weak and almost

exhausted by opposition to her foul abuser, she still remained firm in

her virtuous resolve to be no consenting party to the violence offered

to her, and at the conclusion of three weeks, she was placed by her

ferocious guards in a poor cabin on the roadside, where her friends

might find her. When discovered she was in a condition of the greatest

misery, being so weak as to be unable to walk, stand, or sit. Seventeen

hours were occupied in removing her thirteen miles, to her mother's

house, but when once restored to home and its enjoyments her recovery

was rapid, and in a short time her health was re-established, as far as

it was possible under all the frightful circumstances of her affecting

case. From the description, which she gave of the perpetrators of this

act of violence, several of the party were apprehended. Brown, the

guilty contriver of the plan, escaped from the country; and Fitzmaurice,

alias Captain Rock, evaded the pursuit of justice for a considerable

time, but at last surrendered to a magistrate. The men whose names head

this article, except Fitzmaurice and Costello, were brought to trial on

the 29th of July 1822, at Limerick. Miss Goold appeared to give

evidence, and her narrative, which she delivered with modest dignity,

procured her the willing sympathy of a crowded court. The prisoners were

found Guilty--Death; but the three Leahys and Cussen were subsequently

discharged, on a point of law operating in their favour.

On the 23rd of August following, Walter Fitzmaurice, better known at the

time as Captain Rock, pleaded guilty at the Cork assizes; and, along

with Costello, who was found guilty on the solitary evidence of Miss

Goold's brother, who swore to his having seen him on the night of the

abduction, received sentence of Death.

On the ensuing Saturday, Costello underwent the awful sentence of the

law, but Fitzmaurice was respited, something having arisen in his

favour, principally on the ground of his having pleaded guilty in

consequence of the judge refusing to put off his trial in the absence of

a material witness. Costello, to the last, declared his innocence, not

only of the crime for which he was convicted, but of any connexion

whatever with the White Boys.

PHILIP STOFFEL, AND CHARLES KEPPEL.

EXECUTED FOR MURDER.

On Tuesday night, April the 8th, 1823, a most inhuman murder was

committed at Clapham, on the body of Mrs. Elizabeth Richards, a widow of

seventy-five years of age. The unfortunate lady had resided for thirty

years in the same house at the above town, where she was greatly

respected by the neighbours. She kept no servant, and had no inmate but

an elderly lady named Bell. The latter was in the habit of going out in

the evening to attend a place of religious worship. A little after eight

o'clock on the evening in question a neighbouring woman calling to see

Mrs. Richards found her dead, lying on her back in the parlour, with an

apron stuffed into her mouth. On examination it was found that robbers

had perpetrated the dreadful deed, as the pockets of the deceased had

been violently torn from her side, her watch and some money taken, as

well as several articles of wearing apparel. The villains, however, had

missed the principal object of their attack, for a large sum of money

had escaped their search, which was concealed in an upper room. Upon an

examination of the person of the deceased lady, it appeared that she had

been smothered. She had been left by age only two teeth, and one of

these was forced down her throat by the violence with which the wretches

had thrust the apron into her mouth, with the view, no doubt, of

preventing her from giving alarm. A paper parcel was found in the hall,

on which was written "Mrs. Bell, _hat_ Mrs. Richards, Clapham."

The sensation produced by this unprovoked murder was so great, that a

public meeting was called in a day or two at Clapham, and a reward of

two hundred guineas offered for a discovery of the murderers. The active

officers of Union Hall police-office in the course of a week apprehended

a suspicious character, Philip Stoffel, nephew to Mrs. Richards, a

ruffianly-looking fellow of about twenty years of age. When brought to

the police-office he denied all knowledge of the crime with which he was

accused; but, being requested to write "Mrs. Bell, at Mrs. Richards,"

&c., he wrote the word _hat_ for at, in a hand precisely similar to that

in which the superscription on the parcel found after the murder was

written. Seeing himself detected, he exclaimed, "It is of no use--I was

at the murder!" He then, unsolicited, gave a full account of the whole

transaction, and acknowledged who were with him at the time. Previously,

however, to this confession, another of the gang, named Thomas Scott, a

rat-catcher, was in custody, and had been admitted king's evidence. In

his confession, which gave a minute account of the whole transaction, he

stated that the robbery was planned by Stoffel, who called in the aid of

himself, Keppel, and one Pritchard, but that the murder was the act of

Keppel alone, Stoffel particularly desiring that they would not hurt his

aunt. Whilst Scott was giving the parcel to Mrs. Richards, who went into

the room to read the direction, Stoffel walked in gently and said, "My

good old lady, we don't want to hurt you; we only wish for you to be

quiet." She exclaimed "Oh Lord! oh dear!" when Stoffel put his hand upon

her mouth, and the other two men coming in, he desired Keppel to hold

her whilst he went up stairs, as he knew best where the money was, but

not to hurt her. They then proceeded to rifle the house of all they

could get at, but did not break any locks, for fear of alarming the

people in the next house. Though Mrs. Richards did not move, Scott

declared that he did not think she was dead, but only that she had

fainted.

In consequence of the information contained in Scott's confession, the

officers went in pursuit of Keppel and Pritchard; and after having

travelled from Gravesend to Portsmouth, they succeeded in apprehending

Keppel, who was disguised in a smock-frock, &c. Keppel and Pritchard

were by trade bricklayers, but had led a most abandoned life among the

lowest prostitutes about Westminster. Pritchard, we are sorry to say,

escaped the pursuit of justice, as he was never apprehended. Keppel

denied all knowledge of the murder, and behaved in the most hardened

manner.

Stoffel had every expectation of being admitted king's evidence; but he

was not so fortunate, and he was arraigned along with Keppel at the

Croydon assizes, July the 25th, for the murder of Mrs. Richards. The

evidence against them was conclusive; for the confession of Stoffel, and

the corroborated testimony of the accomplice, Scott, left no doubt

whatever of their guilt.

Having been declared guilty by the jury, the learned judge (Mr. Serjeant

Onslow) put on the black cap, and passed the awful sentence of the law

upon the prisoners. Keppel, whose conduct throughout the whole

transaction had been most thoughtless and hardened, then directly

addressed the court in the most abominable language. He told the judge,

that he was a bloody old rogue, and damned him and his laws together;

and was only prevented from continuing his abuse, by his being forcibly

removed from the dock.

The unhappy wretches continued, up to the day of their execution, which

took place at Horsemonger-lane jail on the 28th July, 1823, to exhibit

the utmost levity of demeanour, but were at length brought to a just

sense of their condition on the morning of their death, and were turned

off, professedly lamenting their past misspent life.

JOHN THURTELL AND JOSEPH HUNT.

CONVICTED OF MURDER.

For cold-blooded villany in its conception, its planning, and its

perpetration, this murder must be allowed to stand unparalleled. The

sensation which it created throughout the country was such, as was

probably never exceeded in any previous case.

The Chronicles of Crime or The New Newgate Calendar. v. 2/2 being a series of memoirs and anecdotes of notorious characters who have outraged the laws of Great Britain from the earliest period to 1841 · 第 9 / 90 段