By lack of caution in time of storm or fog; and

By general carelessness and failure to realize the terrible result

which is bound to follow any lack of care, failure to comply with the

rules and _the uncertainty of detection and punishment if such

carelessness and failure to comply with rules does not cause an

accident_.

Every man in the train, engine, and switching service ought to have

every requirement of these rules by heart, understand exactly what

they mean, and be ready at any instant, and in any weather, to execute

them to the letter, and no punishment should be too severe for failure

to observe them to the very letter, for on their faithful observance

depend the lives of passengers--it may be some of your own loved

ones--of employees, and the safety of the property entrusted to the

companies for transportation, as well as their own. And yet, if the

instructions contained in the two fundamental rules and those known as

the "Flag Rules" had been observed, none of the following cases and

many others that help fill the records and the daily press would have

happened. It is a standing disgrace that such accidents happen, and

the sooner employees help get the careless and reckless men and the

drones out of the service, as it is your duty to yourself and the

companies to do, the quicker the traveling public, yourselves, the

property in transit, and that belonging to your employer and

yourselves, will be safe and the greater your certainty of getting to

the end of your run to be welcomed by the wife and children awaiting

you.

In this connection I want to suggest to the enginemen that when you

discover a cause for the sending out of a flagman give him a chance to

go back before you get stopped, so that he can cover the required

distance quicker. And as these rules are among the most important, if

not the most important, in the book, I call especial attention to

them.

The following cases will illustrate how much room there is for

improvement in this regard:

Joseph Atkinson, brakeman, injured September 26, at Muggleton. He

was standing on top of way-car in train which stopped just west of

the depot and then started up and ran into side of freight train.

Alexander Peabody, engineer, George F. Smivins, fireman, injured

at 10 p.m., October 3, on track 3, near Penryn Ave., Peltonville;

engine No. 784 was backing down track 3, and collided with engine

No. 1891 standing on that track. Instructions require engines

running on this track must run at slow rate of speed, so as to be

able to stop within their vision. The engine was running so fast

that it could not stop, although Engineer Peabody saw engine No.

1891 when 300 feet distant.

J. L. McPherson, yardmaster, and Jacob Gonorowski, brakeman,

injured at Peeweezle, July 28, were in caboose of extra engine No.

674, which was stopping for drawbridge, when engine No. 937,

Engineman Isidore Guggenheimer, ran into the rear of train.

Luke M. Peters, engineer, injured April 14 at Aromintap, was in

charge of engine No. 2143, backing around Y, when train No. 31

backed into extra No. 7326, to which engine No. 2143 was attached.

L. P. Jarvis, engineer, and Samuel Minns, fireman, injured

November 20, at 7:15 a.m., one-half mile east of Peeble's Corners;

engine No. 759 had just backed in on side track with work train,

and switch had not yet been closed; engine No. 1473, train No. 48,

Engineer Tibbits, Conductor Perry, came along at a high rate of

speed, and ran into this open switch just east of the home signal,

colliding with engine No. 759.

February 14, at 8:20 p.m., one mile north of Indianapolis, Ohio

division, extra freight engine, Packard conductor, collided with

Ohio division passenger train No. 11. This freight train had an

order to run from Indianapolis to Cameron as an extra. Indiana

division passenger train 141, due at Indianapolis at 8 p.m., was

15 minutes late. Conductor Packard of the extra was on station

platform when this train pulled in. He supposed it was Ohio

division No. 11 and so told his engineer, and pulled out and met

No. 11 a mile from the station. Two engineers and one fireman were

killed and five trainmen injured. If Rule 53 requiring conductors

and engineers of trains at meeting points to ascertain by word of

mouth what trains they are had been complied with accident would

have been avoided.

Nov. 5 freight train No. 52 slowed down to take side track at Park

Rapids when extra freight moving in same block, on caution card,

ran into caboose and rear brakeman was killed. If Rules 7, 14 or

15 had been complied with accident would not have occurred.

Rule 12a says: When you get a train order the conductors must read it

aloud and then sign it and show it to the engineman, the rear brakeman

or flagman, and the engineman must show it to the fireman and in case

of freight train to the head brakeman, who are required to read it,

the object being that every employee on the train will know what the

order is and if the engineman or conductor forget it the brakeman or

fireman may remember and by remembering prevent an accident.

Railroad Accidents, Their Cause and Prevention · 第 20 / 41 题