CONCLUSIONS

The special interest attached to the Winter Solstice altars at Hano is

in the fact that they are made by Tewa priests whose ancestors came to

Tusayan about the beginning of the eighteenth century. The makers

claim that their forefathers brought a knowledge of them from Tcewadi,

in the upper valley of the Rio Grande in New Mexico, and that their

relatives in the Tewa pueblos in the east still use like altars in

their celebration at the _Tûñtai_.

Nothing, so far as known, has yet been published on the _Tûñtai_

altars of the eastern Tanoan people, but ethnographers may yet find in

the kivas of those villages material which will render the above

descriptions of comparative interest. The resemblance of the _Tûñtai_

altars to that of the _Patki_ and related families in the Walpi

_Moñkiva_ at the Winter Solstice, is a very distant one. Both have

snake effigies, but there is practically little else in common between

them, or with the altar erected at the same time by the _Pakab_ people

in the _Tcivatokiva_. The _Tûñtai_ altars are characteristically

Tewan, and, while homologous with each other, are different from any

yet known from the Hopi pueblos.

The purport of the _Tûñtai_ rites at Hano seems to be similar to that

of the Hopi _Soyaluña_, namely, to draw back the sun in its southern

declination, and to fertilize the corn and other seeds and increase

all worldly possessions. As at Walpi, strings with attached feathers

are made and given to men and women with wishes that the gods may

bring them blessings. These strings are also attached to beams of

houses, placed in springs of water, tied to the tails of horses,

burros, sheep, dogs, chickens, and indeed every possession which the

Indian has and wishes to increase. The presence of the idol of the

snake means snake worship.

The survival of the Tanoan _Tûñtai_ altars at Hano is typical of the

way in which the Tusayan ritual has grown to its present complicated

form. They are instances of an intrusive element which has not yet

been amalgamated, as the knowledge of them is still limited to

unassimilated people and clans.

Similar conditions have existed from time to time during the history

of the Hopi, when new clans were added to those already existing. For

many years incoming clans maintained a strict taboo, and each family

held the secrets of its own religion; but as time went on and

assimilation resulted by intermarriage, the religious society arose,

composed of men and women of different clans. The family to which a

majority of the membership belonged continued to hold the chieftaincy,

and owned the altar and its paraphernalia, cherishing the legends of

the society. But when men of other clans were admitted to membership,

a mutual reaction of one society on another naturally resulted. This

tended to modifications which have obscured the original character of

distinctive family worship.

The problem of the Hopi ritual, by which is meant the sum of all great

ceremonies in the Hopi calendar, deals largely with a composite

system. It implies, as elsewhere pointed out, an investigation of the

characteristic religious observances of several large families which

formerly lived apart in different pueblos. It necessitates a

knowledge of the social composition of Walpi and of the history of the

different phratries which make up the population of the village.

There is a corollary to the above conclusions. No pueblo in the

southwest, outside of Tusayan, has the same ceremonial calendar as

Walpi, because the population of none is made up of the same clans

united in the same relative proportions. Hence the old remark that

what is true of one pueblo is true of all, does not apply to their

ritual. Some ceremonies at Jemez, Acoma, Sia, and Zuñi, for instance,

are like some ceremonies at Walpi; but the old ceremonial calendar in

any one of these pueblos was different from that of the other, because

the component families were not the same. In the same way the

ceremonies at Hano and Walpi have certain things in common, due no

doubt to the assimilation in the latter of certain Tanoan clans, but

their calendars are very different. The _Tûñtai_ at Hano differs more

widely from the Winter Solstice ceremony at Walpi, a gunshot away,

than the Walpi observance differs from that at Oraibi, twenty miles

distant. So we might also predict that if we knew the character of

Winter Solstice altars in the Rio Grande Tewa villages, they would be

found to resemble those of Hano more closely than the altars of Hano

resemble those of Walpi.

The Winter Solstice Altars at Hano Pueblo · 第 15 / 17 题