CHAP. XXX.

The Shape and Mass of the Iron are of most

_importance in coition_.

Observation has shown above that the shape and mass of the loadstone have

great influence in magnetick coitions; likewise also the shape and mass of

the iron bodies give back more powerful and steady forces. Oblong iron rods

are both drawn more quickly to a loadstone and cleave to it with greater

obstinacy than round or square pieces, for the same reasons which we have

proven in the case of the loadstone. But, moreover, this is also worthy of

observation, that a smaller piece of iron, to which is hung a weight of

another material, so that it is altogether in weight equal to another large

whole piece of iron of a right weight * (as regards the strength of the

loadstone), is not lifted by the loadstone as the larger piece of iron

would be. For a smaller piece of iron does not join with a loadstone so

firmly, because it sends back less strength, and only that which is

magnetick conceives strength; the foreign material hung on cannot acquire

magnetick forces.

* * * * *

{99} CHAP. XXXI.

On Long and Round Stones.

Pieces of iron join more firmly with a long stone than with a round one,

provided that the pole of the stone is at the extremity and end of its

length; because, forsooth, in the case of a long stone, a magnetick is

directed at the end straight towards the body in which the virtue proceeds

in straighter lines and through the longer diameter. But a somewhat long

stone has but little power on the side, much less indeed than a round one.

It is demonstrable[180], indeed, that at A and B the coition is * stronger

in a round stone than at C and D, at like distances from the pole.

[Illustration]

* * * * *

On the magnet, magnetick bodies also, and on the great magnet the earth a new physiology, demonstrated by many arguments & experiments · 第 49 / 110 题