CHAP. II.

On the Magnetick Coition, and first on the

Attraction of Amber, or more truly, on the

_Attaching of Bodies to Amber_.

Celebrated has the fame of the loadstone and of amber ever been in the

memoirs of the learned. Loadstone and also amber do some philosophers

invoke when in explaining many secrets their senses become dim and

reasoning cannot go further. Inquisitive theologians also would throw light

on the divine mysteries set beyond the range of human sense, by means of

loadstone and amber; just as idle Metaphysicians, when they are setting up

and teaching useless phantasms, have recourse to the loadstone as if it

were a Delphick sword, an illustration always applicable to everything. But

physicians even (with the authority of {47} Galen), desiring to confirm the

belief in the attraction of purgative medicines by means of the likeness of

substance and the familiarities of the juices--truly a vain and useless

error--bring in the loadstone as witness as being a nature of great

authority and of conspicuous efficacy and a remarkable body. So in very

many cases there are some who, when they are pleading a cause and cannot

give a reason for it, bring in loadstone and amber as though they were

personified witnesses. But these men (apart from that common error) being

ignorant that the causes of magnetical motions are widely different from

the forces of amber, easily fall into error, and are themselves the more

deceived by their own cogitations. For in other bodies a conspicuous force

of attraction manifests itself otherwise than in loadstone; like as in

amber, concerning which some things must first be said, that it may appear

what is that attaching of bodies, and how it is different from and foreign

to the magnetical actions; those mortals being still ignorant, who think

that inclination to be an attraction, and compare it with the magnetick

coitions. The Greeks call it [Greek: êlektron][108] because it attracts

straws to itself, when it is warmed by rubbing; then it is called [Greek:

harpax][109]; and [Greek: chrusophoron] from its golden colour. But the

Moors call it Carabe[110], because they are accustomed to offer the same in

sacrifices and in the worship of the Gods. For Carab signifies to offer in

Arabic; so Carabe, an offering: or seizing chaff, as Scaliger quotes from

Abohalis, out of the Arabic or Persian language. Some also call it Amber,

especially the Indian and Ethiopian amber, called in Latin _Succinum_, as

if it were a juice[111]. The Sudavienses or Sudini[112] call it _geniter_,

as though it were generated terrestrially. The errors of the ancients

concerning its nature and origin having been exploded, it is certain that

amber comes for the most part from the sea, and the rustics collect it on

the coast after the more violent storms, with nets and other tackle; as

among the Sudini of Prussia; and it is also found sometimes on the coast of

our own Britain. It seems, however, to be produced also in the soil and at

spots of some depth, like other bitumens; to be washed out by the waves of

the sea; and to become concreted more firmly from the nature and saltness

of the sea-water. For it was at first a soft and viscous material;

wherefore also it contains enclosed and entombed in pieces of it, shining

in eternal sepulchres, flies, grubs, gnats, ants; which have all flown or

crept or fallen into it when it first flowed forth in a liquid state[113].

The ancients and also more recent writers recall (experience proving the

same thing), that amber attracts straws and chaff[114]. The same is also

done by jet[115], which is dug out of the earth in Britain, in Germany, and

in very many lands, and is a rather hard concretion from black bitumen, and

as it were a transformation into stone. There are many modern authors[116]

who have written and copied from others about amber and jet[117] attracting

chaff, and about other {48} substances generally unknown; with whose

labours the shops of booksellers are crammed. Our own age has produced many

books about hidden, abstruse, and occult causes and wonders, in all of

which amber and jet are set forth as enticing chaff; but they treat the

subject in words alone, without finding any reasons or proofs from

experiments, their very statements obscuring the thing in a greater fog,

forsooth in a cryptic, marvellous, abstruse, secret, occult, way. Wherefore

also such philosophy produces no fruit, because very many philosophers,

making no investigation themselves, unsupported by any practical

experience, idle and inert, make no progress by their records, and do not

see what light they can bring to their theories; but their philosophy rests

simply on the use of certain Greek words, or uncommon ones; after the

manner of our gossips and barbers nowadays, who make show of certain Latin

words to an ignorant populace as the insignia of their craft, and snatch at

the popular favour. For it is not only amber and * jet (as they suppose)

which entice small bodies[118]; but Diamond, Sapphire, Carbuncle, Iris

gem[119], Opal, Amethyst, Vincentina, and Bristolla (an English gem or

spar)[120], Beryl, and Crystal[121] do the same. Similar powers of

attraction are seen also to be possessed by glass (especially when clear

and lucid), as also by false gems made of glass or Crystal, by glass of

antimony, and by many kinds of spars from the mines, and by Belemnites.

Sulphur also attracts, and mastick, and hard sealing-wax[122] compounded of

lac tinctured of various colours. Rather hard resin entices, as does

orpiment[123], but less strongly; with difficulty also and indistinctly

under a suitable dry sky[124], Rock salt, muscovy stone, and rock alum.

This one may see when the air is sharp and clear and rare in mid-winter,

when the emanations from the earth hinder electricks less, and the

electrick bodies become * more firmly indurated; about which hereafter.

These substances draw everything, not straws and chaff only[125], but all

metals, woods, leaves, stones, earths, even water and oil, and everything

which is subject to our senses, or is solid; although some write that amber

does not attract anything but chaff and certain twigs; (wherefore Alexander

Aphrodiseus falsely declares the question of amber to be inexplicable,

because it attracts dry chaff only, and not basil leaves[126]), but these

are the utterly false and disgraceful tales of the writers. But in order

that you may be able clearly to test how such attraction occurs[127], and

what those materials[128] are which thus entice other bodies (for even if

bodies incline towards some of these, yet on account of weakness they seem

not to be raised by them, but are more easily turned), make yourself a

versorium of any metal you like, three or four digits in length, resting

rather lightly on its point of support after the manner of a magnetick

needle, to one end of which bring up a piece of amber or a smooth {49}

[Illustration] and polished gem which has been gently rubbed; for the

versorium turns forthwith. Many things are thereby seen to attract, both

those which are formed by nature alone, and those which are by art

prepared, fused, and mixed; nor is this so much a singular property of one

or two things (as is commonly supposed), but the manifest nature of very

many, both of simple substances, remaining merely in their own form, and of

compositions, as of hard sealing-wax, & of certain other mixtures besides,

made of unctuous stuffs. We must, however, investigate more fully whence

that tendency arises, and what those forces be, concerning which a few men

have brought forward very little, the crowd of philosophizers nothing at

all. By Galen three kinds of attractives in general were recognized in

nature: a First class of those substances which attract by their elemental

quality, namely, heat; the Second is the class of those which attract by

the succession of a vacuum; the Third is the class of those which attract

by a property of their whole substance, which are also quoted by Avicenna

and others. These classes, however, cannot in any way satisfy us; they

neither embrace the causes of amber, jet, and diamond, and of other similar

substances (which derive their forces on account of the same virtue); nor

of the loadstone, and of all magnetick substances, which obtain their

virtue by a very dissimilar and alien influence from them, derived from

other sources. Wherefore also it is fitting that we find other causes of

the motions, or else we must wander (as in darkness), with these men, and

in no way reach the goal. Amber truly does* not allure by heat, since if

warmed by fire and brought near straws, it does not attract them, whether

it be tepid, or hot, or glowing, or even when forced into the flame. Cardan

(as also Pictorio) reckons that this happens in no different way[129] than

with the cupping-glass, by the force of fire. Yet the attracting force of

the cupping-glass does not really come from the force of fire. But he had

previously said that the dry substance wished to imbibe fatty humour, and

therefore it was borne towards it. But these statements are at variance

with one another, and also foreign to reason. For if amber had moved

towards its food, or if other bodies had inclined towards amber as towards

provender, there would have been a diminution of the one which was

devoured, just as there would have been a growth of the other which was

sated. Then why should an attractive force of fire be looked for in amber?

If the attraction existed from heat, why should not very many other bodies

also attract, if warmed by fire, by the sun, or by friction? Neither can

the attraction be on account of the dissipating of the air, when it takes

place in open air (yet Lucretius the poet adduces this as the reason for

magnetical motions). Nor in the cupping-glass can heat or fire attract by

feeding on air: in the cupping-glass air, having been exhausted into flame,

{50} when it condenses again and is forced into a narrow space, makes the

skin and flesh rise in avoiding a vacuum. In the open air warm things

cannot attract, not metals even or stones, if they should * be strongly

incandescent by fire. For a rod of glowing iron, or a flame, or a candle,

or a blazing torch, or a live coal, when they are brought near to straws,

or to a versorium, do not attract; yet at the same time they manifestly

call in the air in succession; because they consume it, as lamps do oil.

But concerning heat, how it is reckoned by the crowd of philosophizers, in

natural philosophy and in _materia medica_ to exert an attraction otherwise

than nature allows, to which true attractions are falsely imputed, we will

discuss more at length elsewhere, when we shall determine what are the

properties of heat and cold. They are very general qualities or kinships of

a substance, and yet are not to be assigned as true causes, and, if I may

say so, those philosophizers utter some resounding words; but about the

thing itself prove nothing in particular. Nor does this attraction

accredited to amber arise from any singular quality of the substance or

kinship, since by more thorough research we find the same effect in very

many other bodies; and all bodies, moreover, of whatever quality, are

allured by all those bodies. Similarity also is not the cause; because all

things around us placed on this globe of the earth, similar and dissimilar,

are allured by amber and bodies of this kind; and on that account no cogent

analogy is to be drawn either from similarity or identity of substance. But

neither do similars mutually attract one another, as stone stone, flesh

flesh, nor aught else outside the class of magneticks and electricks.

Fracastorio would have it that "things which mutually attract one another

are similars, as being of the same species, either in action or in right

subjection. Right subjection is that from which is emitted the emanation

which attracts and which in mixtures often lies hidden on account of their

lack of form, by reason of which they are often different in act from what

they are in potency. Hence it may be that hairs and twigs move towards

amber and towards diamond, not because they are hairs, but because either

there is shut up in them air or some other principle, which is attracted in

the first place, and which bears some relation and analogy to that which

attracts of itself; in which diamond and amber agree through a principle

common to each." Thus far Fracastorio. Who if he had observed by a large

number of experiments that all bodies are drawn to electricks except those

which are aglow and aflame, and highly rarefied, would never have given a

thought to such things. It is easy for men of acute intellect, apart from

experiments and practice, to slip and err. In greater error do they remain

sunk who maintain these same substances to be not similar, but to be

substances near akin; and hold that on that account a thing moves towards

another, its like, by which it is brought to more perfection. But these are

{51} ill-considered views; for towards all electricks all things move[130]

except such as are aflame or are too highly rarefied, as air, which is the

universal effluvium of this globe and of the world. Vegetable substances

draw moisture by which their shoots are rejoiced and grow; from analogy

with that, however, Hippocrates, in his _De Natura Hominis_, Book I.,

wrongly concluded that the purging of morbid humour took place by the

specifick force of the drug. Concerning the action and potency of

purgatives we shall speak elsewhere. Wrongly also is attraction inferred in

other effects; as in the case of a flagon full of water, when buried in a

heap of wheat, although well stoppered, the moisture is drawn out; since

this moisture is rather resolved into vapour by the emanation of the

fermenting wheat, and the wheat imbibes the freed vapour. Nor do elephants'

tusks attract moisture, but drive it into vapour or absorb it. Thus then

very many things are said to attract, the reasons for whose energy must be

sought from other causes. Amber in a fairly large mass allures, if* it is

polished; in a smaller mass or less pure it seems not to attract without

friction. But very many electricks (as precious stones and some other

substances) do not attract at all unless rubbed. On the other hand many

gems, as well as other bodies, are polished, yet do* not allure, and by no

amount of friction are they aroused; thus the emerald, agate, carnelian,

pearls, jasper, chalcedony, alabaster, porphyry, coral, the marbles,

touchstone, flint, bloodstone, emery[131], do not acquire any power; nor do

bones, or ivory, or the hardest woods, as ebony, nor do cedar, juniper, or

cypress; nor do metals, silver, gold, brass, iron, nor any loadstone,

though many of them are finely polished and shine. But on the other hand

there are some other polished substances of which we have spoken before,

toward which, when they have been rubbed, bodies incline. This we shall

understand only when we have more closely looked into the prime origin of

bodies. It is plain to all, and all admit, that the mass of the earth, or

rather the structure and crust of the earth, consists of a twofold

material, namely, of fluid and humid matter, and of material of more

consistency and dry. From this twofold nature or the more simple compacting

of one, various substances take their rise among us, which originate in

greater proportion now from the earthy, now from the aqueous nature. Those

substances which have received their chief growth from moisture, whether

aqueous or fatty, or have taken on their form by a simpler compacting from

them, or have been compacted from these same materials in long ages, if

they have a sufficiently firm hardness, if rubbed after they have been

polished and when they remain bright with the friction--towards those

substances everything, if presented to them in the air, turns, if its too

heavy weight does not prevent it. For amber has been compacted of moisture,

and jet also. Lucid gems are made of water; just as Crystal[132], which has

been concreted from clear water, not {52} always by a very great cold, as

some used to judge, and by very hard frost, but sometimes by a less severe

one, the nature of the soil fashioning it, the humour or juices being shut

up in definite cavities, in the way in which spars are produced in mines.

So clear glass is fused out of sand, and from other substances, which have

their origin in humid juices. But the dross of metals, as also metals,

stones, rocks, woods, contain earth rather, or are mixed with a good deal

of earth; * and therefore they do not attract. Crystal, mica, glass, and

all electricks do not attract if they are burnt or roasted; for their

primordial supplies of moisture perish by heat, and are changed and

exhaled. All things therefore which have sprung from a predominant moisture

and are firmly concreted, and retain the appearance of spar and its

resplendent nature in a firm and compact body, allure all bodies, whether

humid or dry. Those, however, which partake of the true earth-substance or

are very little different from it, are seen to attract also, but from a far

different reason, and (so to say) magnetically; concerning these we intend

to speak afterwards. But those substances which are more mixed of water and

earth, and are produced by the equal degradation of each element (in which

the magnetick force of the earth is deformed and remains buried; while the

watery humour, being fouled by joining with a more plentiful supply of

earth, has not concreted in itself but is mingled with earthy matter), can

in no way of themselves attract or move from its place anything which they

do not touch. On this account metals, marbles, flints, woods, herbs, flesh,

and very many other things can neither allure nor solicit any body either

magnetically or electrically. (For it pleases us to call that an electrick

force, which hath * its origin from the humour.) But substances consisting

mostly of humour, and which are not very firmly compacted by nature

(whereby do they neither bear rubbing, but either melt down and become

soft, or are not levigable, such as pitch, the softer kinds of resin,

camphor, galbanum, ammoniack[133], storax, asafoetida, benzoin, asphaltum,

especially in rather warm weather) towards them small bodies are not borne;

for without rubbing most electricks do not * emit their peculiar and native

exhalation and effluvium. The resin turpentine when liquid does not

attract; for it cannot be rubbed; but if it has hardened into a mastick it

does attract. But now at length we must understand why small bodies turn

towards those substances which have drawn their origin from water; by what

force and with what hands (so to speak) electricks seize upon kindred

natures. In all bodies in the world two causes or principles have been laid

down, from which the bodies themselves were produced, matter and form[134].

Electrical motions become strong from matter, but magnetick from form

chiefly; and they differ widely from one another and turn out unlike, since

the one is ennobled by numerous virtues and is prepotent; the other is

ignoble and of less potency, and {53} mostly restrained, as it were, within

certain barriers; and therefore that force must at times be aroused by

attrition or friction, until it is at a dull heat and gives off an

effluvium and a polish is induced on the body. For spent air, either blown

out of the mouth or given* off from moister air, chokes the virtue. If

indeed either a sheet of paper or a piece of linen be interposed, there

will be no movement. But a loadstone, without friction or heat, whether dry

or suffused with moisture, as well in air as in water, invites magneticks,

even with the most solid bodies interposed, even planks of wood or pretty

thick slabs of stone or sheets of metal. A loadstone appeals to magneticks*

only; towards electricks all things move. A loadstone[135] raises great

weights; so that if there is a loadstone weighing two ounces and strong, it

attracts half an ounce or a whole ounce. An electrical substance only

attracts very small weights; as, for instance, a piece of amber of three

ounces weight, when rubbed, scarce raises a fourth part of a grain of

barley. But this attraction of amber and of electrical substances must be

further investigated; and since there is this particular affection of

matter, it may be asked why is amber rubbed, and what affection is produced

by the rubbing, and what causes arise which make it lay hold on everything?

As a result of friction it grows slightly warm and becomes smooth; two

results which must often occur together. A large polished fragment of amber

or jet attracts indeed, even without friction, but less strongly; but if it

be brought gently near a flame or a live coal, so that it equally becomes

warm, it does not attract small bodies because* it is enveloped in a cloud

from the body of the flaming substance, which emits a hot breath, and then

impinges upon it vapour from a foreign body which for the most part is at

variance with the nature of amber. Moreover the spirit of the amber which

is called forth is enfeebled by alien heat; wherefore it ought not to have

heat excepting that produced by motion only and friction, and, as it were,

its own, not sent into it by other bodies. For as the igneous heat emitted

from any burning substance cannot be so used that electricks may acquire

their force from it; so also heat from the solar rays does not fit an

electrick by the loosening of its* right material, because it dissipates

rather and consumes it (albeit a body which has been rubbed retains its

virtue longer exposed to the rays of the sun than in the shade; because in

the shade the effluvia are condensed to a greater degree and more quickly).

Then again the fervour from the light of the Sun aroused by means of a*

burning mirror confers no vigour on the heated amber[136]; indeed it

dissipates and corrupts all the electrick effluvia. Again, burning* sulphur

and hard wax, made from shell-lac, when aflame do not allure; for heat from

friction resolves bodies into effluvia, which flame consumes away. For it

is impossible for solid electricks to be resolved into their own true

effluvia otherwise than by attrition, save {54} in the case of certain

substances which by reason of innate vigour emit effluvia constantly. They

are rubbed with bodies which do not befoul their surface, and which produce

a polish, as pretty stiff silk or a rough wool rag which is as little

soiled as possible, or the dry palm. Amber also is rubbed with amber, with

diamond, and with glass, and numerous other substances. Thus are electricks

manipulated. These things being so, what is it which moves? Is it the body

itself, inclosed within its own circumference? Or is it something

imperceptible to us, which flows out from the substance into the ambient

air? Somewhat as Plutarch opines, saying in his _Quæstiones

Platonicæ_[137]: That there is in amber something flammable or something

having the nature of breath, and this by the attrition of the surface being

emitted from its relaxed pores attracts bodies. And if it be an effusion

does it seize upon the air whose motion the bodies follow, or upon the

bodies themselves? But if amber allured the body itself, then what need

were there of friction, if it is bare and smooth? Nor does the force arise

from the light which is reflected from a smooth and polished body; for a

Gem of Vincent's rock[138], Diamond, and clear glass, attract when they are

rough; but not so powerfully and quickly, because they are not so readily

cleansed from extraneous moisture on the surface, and are not rubbed

equally so as to be copiously resolved at that part. Nor does the sun by

its own beams of light and its rays, which are of capital importance in

nature, attract bodies in this way; and yet the herd of philosophizers

considers that humours are attracted by the sun, when it is only denser

humours that are being turned into thinner, into spirit and air; and so by

the motion of effusion they ascend into the upper regions, or the

attenuated exhalations are raised up from the denser air. Nor does it seem

to take place from the effluvia attenuating the air, so that bodies

impelled by the denser air penetrate towards the source of the rarefaction;

in this case both hot and flaming bodies would also allure other bodies;

but not even the lightest chaff, or any versorium moves towards a flame. If

there is a flow and rush of air towards the body, how can a small diamond

of the size of a pea[139] summon towards itself so much air, that it seizes

hold of a biggish long body placed in equilibrio (the air about one or

other very small part of an end being attracted)? It ought also to have

slopped or moved more slowly, before it came into contact with the body,

especially if the piece of amber was rather broad and flat, from the

accumulation of air on the surface of the amber and its flowing back again.

If it is because the effluvia are thinner, and denser vapours come in

return, as in breathing, then the body would rather have had a motion

toward the electrick a little while after the beginning of the application;

but when electricks which have been rubbed are applied quickly to * a

versorium then especially at once they act on the versorium, and it is

attracted more when near them. But if it is because the rarefied {55}

effluvia produce a rarefied medium, and on that account bodies are more

prone to slip down from a denser to a more attenuated medium; they might

have been carried from the side in this way or downwards, but not to bodies

above them; or the attraction and apprehension of contiguous bodies would

have been momentary only. But with a single friction jet and amber draw and

attract bodies to them strongly and for a long time, sometimes for the

twelfth part of an hour, especially in clear weather. But if the mass of

amber be rather large, and the surface polished, it attracts without

friction. Flint is rubbed and emits by attrition an inflammable matter that

turns into sparks and heat. Therefore the denser effluvia of flint

producing fire are very far different from electrical effluvia, which on

account of their extreme attenuation do not take fire, nor are fit material

for flame. Those effluvia are not of the nature of breath, for when emitted

they do not propel anything, but are exhaled without sensible resistance

and touch bodies. They are highly attenuated humours much more subtile than

the ambient air; and in order that they may occur, bodies are required

produced from humour and concreted with a considerable degree of hardness.

Non-electrick bodies are not resolved into humid effluvia, and those

effluvia mix with the common and general effluvia of the earth, and are not

peculiar. Also besides the attraction of bodies, they retain them longer.

It is probable therefore that amber does exhale something peculiar to *

itself, which allures bodies themselves, not the intermediate air. Indeed

it plainly does draw the body itself in the case of a spherical drop of

water standing on a dry surface; for a piece of amber applied to it at a

suitable distance pulls the nearest parts out of their position and draws

it up into a cone; otherwise, if it were * drawn by means of the air

rushing along, the whole drop would have moved. That it does not attract

the air is thus demonstrated: take a very thin wax candle, which makes a

very small and clear flame; bring up to this, within two digits or any

convenient distance, a piece of amber or jet, a broad flat piece, well

prepared * and skilfully rubbed, such a piece of amber as would attract

bodies far and wide, yet it does not disturb the flame; which of necessity

would have occurred, if the air was disturbed, for the flame would have

followed the current of air. As far as the effluvia are sent out, so far it

allures; but as a body approaches, its motion is accelerated, stronger

forces drawing it; as also in the case of magneticks and in all natural

motion; not by attenuating or by expelling the air, so that the body moves

down into the place of the air which has gone out[140]; for thus it would

have allured only and would not have retained; since it would at first also

have repelled approaching bodies just as it drives the air itself; but

indeed a particle, be it ever so small, does not avoid the first

application made very quickly after rubbing. An effluvium exhales from

amber and is emitted by rubbing: pearls, carnelian, agate, jasper,

chalcedony, coral, metals, {56} and other substances of that kind, when

they are rubbed, produce no effect. Is there not also something which is

exhaled from them by heat and attrition? Most truly; but from grosser

bodies more blended with the earthy nature, that which is exhaled is gross

and spent; for even towards very many electricks, if they are rubbed * too

hard, there is produced but a weak attraction of bodies, or none at all;

the attraction is best when the rubbing has been gentle and very quick; for

so the finest effluvia are evoked. The effluvia arise from the subtile

diffusion of humour, not from excessive and turbulent violence; especially

in the case of those substances which have been compacted from unctuous

matter, which when the atmosphere is very thin, when the North winds, and

amongst us (English) the East winds, are blowing, have a surer and firmer

effect, but during South winds and in damp weather, only a weak one; so

that those * substances which attract with difficulty in clear weather, in

thick weather produce no motion at all; both because in grosser air lighter

substances move with greater difficulty; and especially because the

effluvia are stifled, and the surface of the body that has been rubbed is

affected by the spent humour of the air, and the effluvia are stopped at

their very starting. On that account in the case of amber, jet, and

sulphur, because they do not so easily take up moist air on their surface

and are much more plenteously set free, that force is not so quickly

suppressed as in gems, crystal, glass, and substances of that kind which

collect on their surface the moister breath which has grown heavy. But it

may be asked why does amber allure water, when water placed on its surface

removes its action? Evidently because it is one thing to suppress it at its

very start, and quite another to extinguish it when it has been * emitted.

So also thin and very fine silk, in common language _Sarcenet_, placed

quickly on the amber, after it has been rubbed, * hinders the attraction of

the body; but if it is interposed in the intervening space, it does not

entirely obstruct it. Moisture also from spent air, and any breath blown

from the mouth, as well as water put on the amber, immediately extinguishes

its force. But oil, which is light and pure, does not hinder it; for

although amber * be rubbed with a warm finger dipped in oil, still it

attracts. But * if that amber, after the rubbing, is moistened with _aqua

vitæ_ or spirits of wine, it does not attract; for it is heavier than oil,

denser, and when added to oil sinks beneath it. For oil is light and rare,

and does not resist the most delicate effluvia. A breath therefore,

proceeding from a body which had been compacted from humour or from a

watery liquid, reaches the body to be attracted; the body that is reached

is united with the attracting body, and the one body lying near the other

within the peculiar radius of its effluvia makes one out of two; united,

they come together into the closest accord, and this is commonly called

attraction. This unity, according to {57} the opinion of Pythagoras, is the

principle of all things, and through participation in it each several thing

is said to be one. For since no action can take place by means of matter

unless by contact, these electricks are not seen to touch, but, as was

necessary, something is sent from the one to the other, something which may

touch closely and be the beginning of that incitement. All bodies are

united and, as it were, cemented together in some way by moisture; so that

a wet body, when it touches another body, attracts it, if it is small. So

wet bodies on the surface of water attract wet bodies. But the peculiar

electrical effluvia, which are the most subtile material of diffuse humour,

entice corpuscles. Air (the common effluvium of the earth) not only unites

the disjointed parts, but the earth calls bodies back to itself by means of

the intervening air; otherwise bodies which are in higher places would not

so eagerly make for the earth. Electrical effluvia differ greatly from air;

and as air is the effluvium of the earth, so electricks have their own

effluvia and properties, each of them having by reason of its peculiar

effluvia a singular tendency toward unity, a motion toward its origin and

fount, and toward the body emitting the effluvia. But those substances

which by attrition emit a gross or vapourous or aeriform effluvium produce

no effect; for either such effluvia are alien to the humour (the uniter of

all things), or being very like common air are blended with the air and

intermingle with the air, wherefore they produce no effect in the air, and

do not cause motions different from those so universal and common in

nature. In like manner * bodies strive to be united and move on the surface

of water, just [Illustration] as the rod C, which is put a little way under

water. It is plain that the rod E F, which floats on the water by reason of

the cork H, and only has its wet end F above the surface of the water, is

attracted by the rod C, if the rod C is wet a little above the surface of

the water; they are suddenly united, just as a drop adjoining a drop is

attracted. So a wet thing on the surface of water seeks union with a wet

thing, since the surface of the water is raised on both; and they

immediately flow together, just like drops or bubbles. But they are in much

greater proximity than electricks, and are united by their clammy natures.

If, however, the whole rod be dry * above the water, it no longer attracts,

but drives away the stick E F. The same is seen in those bubbles also which

are made on {58} water. For we see one drive towards another, and the

quicker the nearer they are. Solids are impelled towards solids by the

medium of liquid: for example, touch the end of a versorium with the end of

a rod on which a drop of water is projecting; as soon as the versorium

touches the top of the droplet, immediately it is joined * strongly by a

swift motion to the body of the rod. So concreted humid things attract when

a little resolved into air (the effluvia in the intermediate space tending

to produce unity); for water has on wet bodies, or on bodies wet with

abundant moisture on the top of water, the force of an effluvium. Clear air

is a convenient medium for an electrical effluvium excited from concreted

humour. Wet bodies projecting above the surface of water (if they are near)

run together so that they may unite; for the surface of the water is raised

around wet substances. But a dry thing is not impelled to a wet one, nor a

wet to a dry, but seems to run away. For if all is dry above the water, the

surface of the water close to it does not rise, but shuns it, the wave

sinking around a dry thing. So neither does a wet thing move towards the

dry rim of a vessel; but it seeks [Illustration] a wet rim. A B is the

surface of the water; C D two rods, which stand up wet above the water; it

is manifest that the surface of the water is raised at C and D along with

the rods; and therefore the rod C, by reason of the water standing up

(which seeks its level and unity), moves with the water to D. On E, on the

other hand, a wet rod, the water also rises; but on the dry rod F the

surface is depressed; and as it drives to depress also the wave rising on E

in its neighbourhood, the higher wave at E turns away from F[141]; for it

does not suffer itself to be depressed. All electrical attraction occurs

through an intervening humour; so it is by reason of humour that all things

mutually come together; fluids indeed and aqueous bodies on the surface of

water, but concreted things, if they have been resolved into vapour, in

air;--in air indeed, the effluvium of electricks being very rare, that it

may the better permeate the medium and not impel it by its motion; for if

that effluvium had been thick, as that of air, or of the winds, or of

saltpetre burnt by fire, as the thick and foul effluvia given out with very

great force, from other bodies, or air set free from humour by heat rushing

out through a pipe (in the instrument of Hero of Alexandria, described in

his {59} book _Spiritalia_), then the effluvium would drive everything

away, not allure it. But those rarer effluvia take hold of bodies and

embrace them as if with arms extended, with the electricks to which they

are united; and they are drawn to the source, the effluvia increasing in

strength with the proximity. But what is that effluvium from crystal,

glass, and diamond, since these are bodies of considerable hardness and

firmly concreted? In order that such an effluvium should be produced, there

is no need of any marked or perceptible flux[142] of the substance; nor is

it necessary that the electrick should be abraded, or worn away, or

deformed. Some odoriferous substances are fragrant for many years, exhaling

continually, yet are not quickly consumed. Cypress wood as long as it is

sound, and it lasts a very long time indeed, is redolent; as many learned

men attest from experience. Such an electrick only for a moment, when

stimulated by friction, emits powers far more subtile and more fine beyond

all odours; yet sometimes amber, jet, sulphur, when they are somewhat

easily let free into vapour, also pour out at the same time an odour; and

on this account they allure with the very gentlest rubbing, often even

without rubbing; they also excite more strongly, and retain hold for a

longer time, because they have stronger effluvia and last longer. But

diamond, glass, rock-crystal, * and numerous others of the harder and

firmly concreted gems first grow warm: therefore at first they are rubbed

longer, and then they also attract strongly; nor are they otherwise set

free into vapour. Everything rushes towards electricks[143] excepting

flame, and flaming bodies, and the thinnest air. Just as they do not draw

flame, in like manner they do not affect a versorium, if on any side it is

very near to a flame, either the flame of a lamp or of any burning matter.

It is manifest indeed that the effluvia are destroyed by flame and igneous

* heat; and therefore they attract neither flame nor bodies very near a

flame. For electrical effluvia have the virtue of, and are analogous with,

extenuated humour; but they will produce their effect, union and

continuity, not by the external impulse of vapours, not by heat and

attenuation of heated bodies, but by their humidity itself attenuated into

its own peculiar effluvia. Yet they entice * smoke sent out by an

extinguished light; and the more that smoke is attenuated in seeking the

upper regions, the less strongly is it turned aside; for things that are

too rarefied are not drawn to them; and at length, when it has now almost

vanished, it does not * incline towards them at all, which is easily seen

against the light. When in fact the smoke has passed into air, it is not

moved, as has been demonstrated before. For air itself, if somewhat thin,

is not attracted in any way, unless on account of succeeding that which has

vacated its place, as in furnaces and such-like, where the air is fed in by

mechanical devices for drawing it in. Therefore an effluvium resulting from

a non-fouling friction, and one which {60} is not changed by heat, but

which is its own, causes union and coherency, a prehension and a congruence

towards its source, if only the body to be attracted is not unfitted for

motion, either by the surroundings of the bodies or by its own weight. To

the bodies therefore of the electricks themselves small bodies are borne.

The effluvia extend out their virtue--effluvia which are proper and

peculiar to them, and _sui generis_, differing from common air, being

produced from humour, excited by a calorifick motion from attrition and

attenuation. And as if they were material rays[144], they hold and take up

chaff, straws, and twigs, until they become extinct or vanish away: and

then they (the corpuscles) being loosed again, attracted by the earth

itself, fall down to the earth. The difference between Magneticks and

Electricks[145] is that all magneticks run together with mutual forces;

electricks only allure; that which is allured is not changed by an

implanted force, but that which has moved up to * them voluntarily rests

upon them by the law of matter. Bodies are borne towards electricks in a

straight line towards the centre of the electrick; a loadstone draws a

loadstone directly at the poles only, in other parts obliquely and

transversely, and in this way also they adhere and hang to one another.

Electrical motion is a motion of aggregation of matter; magnetical motion

is one of disposition and conformation. The globe of the earth is

aggregated and cohæres by itself electrically. The globe of the earth is

directed and turned magnetically; at the same time also it both cohæres,

and in order that it may be solid, is in its inmost parts cemented

together.

* * * * *

On the magnet, magnetick bodies also, and on the great magnet the earth a new physiology, demonstrated by many arguments & experiments · 第 28 / 110 题