Prussia was greatly displeased, and a decisive moment was at hand,

for the Russian and Austrian armies were advancing against Napoleon.

According to his usual custom, the impetuous military chieftain of

France had ventured all risks, for he had boldness and fortune in

addition to his genius; he entered Moravia, and, if Prussia had then

declared herself, it would have been all over with him, as with

150,000 men on his flank, his position would have been utterly lost;

and to obtain this object the most pressing negotiations were going

on at Berlin, England offering subsidies, Russia support, and Austria

a larger share of territory, even in Poland. Hardenberg's opinion was

to decide at once, but was his influence always predominant in the

midst of so much corruption? Among those who sided with him was the

noble-minded Queen, and the brave and generous Prince Louis of Prussia;

but he had to contend with the personal opinion of Count Haugwitz and

the Marquis Lucchesini, both strongly in favour of the French cabinet.

The system of a supine neutrality, therefore, carried the day, and the

utmost Hardenberg could obtain was permission to assure England that

they would protect the independence of Hanover, so far as to allow a

passage to the English troops, should they be attacked or pursued by

Napoleon.

On this subject the Prussian minister wrote a letter to Lord Harrowby,

in which rather a remarkable view was taken of the neutrality; a

certain inclination towards the opinions and sentiments of the

coalition appeared to filter through it, with a considerable degree of

irritation with regard to the French cabinet, which had already failed

to respect the Prussian neutrality.

Baron Hardenberg had been in hopes of obtaining a positive decision,

which would have placed Prussia in the first rank among nations, for

150,000 men directed against the flank of Napoleon would have secured

the victory to Europe, when intelligence was received of the wonders

achieved at Austerlitz. Napoleon was a gambler on an immense scale! His

eagle threw the dice of human destiny from his immense claws, and the

chances had hitherto always been in his favour; but, besides this, did

he not always quarrel with characters inclined to temporise, and who

delayed declaring themselves until victory had decided in favour of one

of the parties? After the battle of Austerlitz was it a time to assume

a threatening attitude, when Austria and Russia were going to treat

with the Emperor of the French on a common footing?

Under these circumstances, then, the position of Baron Hardenberg

became difficult, nay, intolerable, for was he not considered as the

representative of the warlike party and the opponent of Napoleon? How

could the minister of the heroic Queen and Prince Louis of Prussia

remain at the head of the cabinet, when Prussia, prostrate before

Napoleon, seemed almost to solicit pardon for having assumed, however

slightly, an attitude of independence? At that time, Napoleon, who was

incapable of forgiveness, knew well how to ruin a man by dictating

articles for the _Moniteur_, pronouncing thus a sentence against

statesmen whom he wished to get rid of. Buonaparte was an excellent

pamphleteer, and, when he got into a passion, he gave vent in this

manner to his ill-humour, against a king, a minister, or a general.

M. Maret used to write from his dictation in short-hand, and send

it afterwards to the official newspaper, according to his original

profession of a journalist; he, also, possessed a certain knack for

composition.

Upon this occasion Hardenberg was honoured by the capricious abuse of

the Emperor, in consequence of a despatch full of impartiality which he

had addressed to Lord Harrowby, concerning the neutrality of Hanover. A

word from Buonaparte to the court of Berlin was sufficient to procure

the dismissal of the minister, and, having retired from the cabinet,

he the very same day repelled the attacks of the French emperor, who

had accused him of not even being a Prussian. "I am proud," said he,

"of the esteem and confidence of the sovereign and people of Prussia;

I am proud of the opinion of estimable foreigners, and it is with

great satisfaction that I number some Frenchmen among them. I am not

a Prussian by birth, it is true, but I will yield in patriotism to no

native of that country; and I have obtained a right to assert this

fact, both by my services, and by having transferred my patrimony, and

become a proprietor in this country. Though I am not a soldier, I feel

that I should not have proved unworthy, had fate summoned me to bear

arms in defence of my sovereign and his rights, or the dignity, safety,

and honour of the state."

There was a degree of asperity in these expressions as uttered by a

man who had given up the direction of affairs, without the hope of

resuming it. He resigned his portfolio to Count Haugwitz, under the

influence of the Marquis Lucchesini and the secretary, M. Lombard,

and then, encompassed by the attachment of the Prussian army, and the

enthusiasm of the universities, he retired into the country, like a man

to whom the present time is devoid of interest. Some very significant

proceedings, however, were going on in Prussia; the government had

adopted extremely moderate measures, and both the king and the cabinet

were desirous of maintaining the conditions of the French alliance:

but there was a movement among the people, an energetic expression of

national feeling, which would not allow this condition of quiet and

peace to be maintained in the state.

This double situation affords an explanation of the events, and many of

the faults, of this period; the tergiversations of the cabinet, which

appeared constantly to have an inclination towards public opinion, and

then again, especially after the battle of Austerlitz, returned to

their former dread of the Emperor. At length the king, pressed by the

people, roused himself, and manifested a chivalrous disposition in

accordance with the spirit of the nation, and more especially of the

universities; and it reached such a pitch, that, after the retirement

of Hardenberg, the people flew to arms in a hasty and adventurous

manner, and without sufficiently calculating the course they were

to pursue. And who was to conduct this war? Count Haugwitz, already

devoted to France, and the secretary Lombard, both creatures of

Napoleon! One would have said treachery was already determined upon.

Nothing could surpass the campaign of Jena, no praise be too great for

that admirable military movement directed by the Eagle of Austerlitz.

But were these splendid victories due entirely to the brilliant and

energetic courage of the imperial army? had not a series of faults been

committed by their opponents? and were those who directed the cabinet

of Berlin perfectly faithful and devoted to the interests of Prussia?

After the disasters of Jena so many acts of secret treason came to

light, that Hardenberg, under the influence of Queen Louisa and the

Emperor Alexander, was again placed at the head of foreign affairs,

for an inclination to resist the power of France had now sprung up.

This new situation of the cabinets of Russia and Prussia requires

some explanation, because it formed the basis of the intimate union,

which at a later period led to the ruin of the French empire. The

dissatisfaction before entertained by the cabinet of St. Petersburg

against Prussia proceeded entirely from the position of indifferent

neutrality assumed by the latter ever since the treaty of Basle; and

all the endeavours made by England, Austria, and Russia to induce the

cabinet of Berlin to break through this mischievous situation had met

with a refusal, for neutrality appeared to be the fundamental principle

of the Prussian political system. It was, therefore, satisfactory to

see Prussia willing to engage in hostilities, though at _the eleventh

hour_, for her position by that means became clear and decided; and it

was of little consequence if they had been unsuccessful in the campaign

of Jena, provided the spirit of their government was in favour of

war; if, in short, there was a degree of unity and vigour capable of

supporting the coalesced cabinets.

Baron Hardenberg thus became the representative of the alliance between

Russia and Prussia. Frederic William having been obliged to evacuate

Berlin, had fallen back with the ruins of his army upon the Russian

troops, and then commenced the campaign in the midst of wintry snows,

the fiercely-contested and sanguinary battle of Prussisch-Eylau,

where first paled the star of Napoleon! Friedland, however, saved the

audacious eagle, as Austerlitz had preserved it two years before, and

treaties were again had recourse to. Who can express the humiliating

conditions dictated by the victor to Prussia? Who describe the cold

sarcastic conduct of the fortunate soldier towards the heroic queen,

the idol of the universities?

Baron Hardenberg, being again compelled to retire, resigned his

portfolio to the new cabinet formed by Napoleon, from which every mind

possessed of any degree of independence or elevation was excluded.

Prussia became almost a department of France, traversed in every

direction by military roads; the whole population of some districts was

carried away by the generals of Buonaparte, with blows and violence;

the universities were closed, and the provinces reduced to the last

extremity; while such heavy military contributions were imposed, that

they wrung from the peasant his last hard-earned crown, and even

his plough and his oxen. People must not treat a country thus, when

they are desirous of governing it; they should recollect that the

superiority of a power does not result from violence, but from the

moral ascendancy produced by protection and support.

But at the side of the public government of Prussia, bowed down before

the wrath and violence of Napoleon, a number of secret associations

had been brought into existence, by the oppression of the conquerors;

and taking the Fatherland for their watchword, they only awaited a

crisis for vengeance. After the death of their noble-hearted queen

these associations greatly increased, and the most eminent among the

patriots, as well as the statesmen out of favour, participated in them,

for the salvation of the country was at stake. It is incontestable that

Hardenberg was the _mind_ of this national conspiracy, as Blucher and

Gneisenau were its _sword_; this secret and magnificent undertaking,

this moral resistance, advanced with indescribable and undeviating

energy, during the period which elapsed between 1808 and 1811, and

then, by a capricious will of the Emperor Napoleon, Hardenberg was

again destined to receive a mark of confidence from his sovereign, and

the government of Prussia was once more placed in his hands. I consider

this to have been the most critical period for Northern Germany; the

provinces, constantly traversed by French troops, were completely in

the power of their generals, and that fine country was now nothing but

a magazine of forage, provisions, and money for the French troops.

In the midst of these disastrous circumstances, the minister applied

himself particularly to reinstating some little degree of order in the

complicated administration of Prussia; he relieved the people as far as

it was possible, and above all, he endeavoured to reorganise the army,

firmly, but not openly, for this Napoleon would not have permitted,

but by a military system which constantly summoned the young soldiers

to their duties, and then shortly afterwards restored them to their

families and their homes; a plan which permitted him to have a fine

army in preparation for future events, at a very moderate expense.

The system of military reserves is essentially Prussian, because it

realizes the double idea of a considerable army in time of war, and

a limited contingent during peace; by this means every Prussian is a

soldier.

If at this time the Emperor treated Prussia with some little degree of

respect, if he even called for the concurrence of Baron Hardenberg, it

was because, being then almost on the eve of undertaking a campaign

against Russia, he was desirous of engaging Prussia in it as an

auxiliary; and as the cabinet was already devoted to him, Buonaparte

sought to enlist popular opinion in his favour, by means of their

favourite minister. And here a question may be asked, of great

importance to history. How came Hardenberg to affix his signature to

the secret treaty which placed the Prussian army under the orders of

Napoleon? Had he really and in good faith entered into the alliance?

or had he only signed it with the determination of breaking through

its conditions at the first check experienced by the French arms? It

is necessary we should recollect, that with Napoleon there were no

discussions, no considering the various clauses of a treaty; and the

correspondence of M. de Saint-Marsan with M. Maret, with the notes and

explanations of the Prussian minister with the French ambassador, are

sufficient to carry conviction that nothing was free or spontaneous on

this occasion: every thing was submitted to from the most imperious

necessity; there was no choice given of acceptance or refusal, but

Prussia placed her army and her treasury at the disposal of the

conqueror, because he had said, _It is my will_.

Now in these necessities, imposed by misfortune, did no gleam of hope

remain? In politics, no alliances are durable but those resting upon a

perfect agreement of views and interests. When two people unite because

they are free and happy, because they feel a mutual esteem and regard

for each other, because they reciprocally afford and receive important

services, then, depend upon it, these alliances are durable, these

treaties will be carefully carried out. But suppose, on the contrary,

a people vanquished and humbled--a king of Prussia, the descendant of

Frederic the Great, to whom M. Maret insolently writes, "that he must

sign a military and diplomatic convention, under pain of captivity;"

does such a treaty as that form an alliance? is the convention which

delivers up Berlin to the French army, a treaty between friends and

allies? or could the plan which parcelled out the Prussian army, into

divisions under French marshals or generals, be a free, upright, or

durable proceeding? Surely not: this reconciliation could only be

momentary; it was imposed by main force, and with the decline of power

it must come to an end.

In addition to this, the Prussian government could no longer control

the people of Germany, indignant at the humiliations they were called

upon to submit to. That Hardenberg was acquainted with the proceedings

of the secret societies, does not admit of a doubt, neither is it less

certain that he permitted their developement, in order afterwards to

avail himself of them, as a powerful instrument against the oppression

of France; but a circumstance one cannot comprehend is, that it should

not have occurred even to the inferior mind of M. de Saint-Marsan,

and the very moderate capacity of M. Maret, that at the first reverse

experienced by the grand army, all these alliances would be got rid

of, as something troublesome and offensive--in fact, as a yoke to be

cast off. To what a degree of humiliation was the House of Frederic now

reduced! Prussia, in a suppliant attitude, had solicited an alliance

with the Buonaparte family, and Hardenberg, the principal negotiator,

had received a cold refusal! Was it possible all this should be

forgotten? On one side was the recollection of their young and heroic

queen, who had died broken-hearted, insulted in the public papers,

and calumniated in pamphlets; and on the other, was a people ground

down by oppression, but undertaking its own preparations for the day

of independence; while to the insolence of the chief we must add all

the harshness of his generals, and of the people employed in levying

contributions. I do not wish here to mention proper names, but if any

men are still living who were then employed in the local administration

of Prussia, let them speak, and say, whether the system to which

Prussia was subjected, was one possible for her to maintain, in spite

of all the hopes of liberty inspired by the general rising in Europe?

and whether it was not natural the conflagration of Moscow should be

succeeded by other flames?

The most important events in Prussia commenced from this period. The

fatal campaign of Moscow being concluded, the French army, a miserable

swarm of fugitives, fell back upon the frontiers of Prussia, so lately

traversed under different auspices! The corps of Marshal Macdonald was

compelled to retreat from the siege of Riga, and the brave and faithful

chief brought back with him the Prussians, especially the division

of York, long under the influence of the principles inculcated by

Schill. News suddenly arrived that the Prussians refused to fight, and

General York addressed a respectful letter to the Marshal, declaring

his intention of maintaining a perfect neutrality with the Russian

armies. This defection extended to all the Prussian troops, and excited

surprise, though it had long been in preparation; in fact, both

officers and soldiers were all strongly imbued with the doctrines

of Schill, Stein, and the secret societies; and Prussia, ripe for

independence, obtained it at last: a bright dawn had begun to appear,

and wherefore should she not avail herself of it?

Such being the state of popular opinion in Prussia, let us now inquire

what was the spirit of the cabinet conducted by Baron Hardenberg. He

had evidently been well acquainted with the existence of the secret

societies, and the edicts of Breslau, issued on the 3d and 9th of

February, which gave a military organisation to the _Tugendbund_, were

drawn up and signed by him; and admirable indeed were these patriotic

papers, calling upon all the sons of Germany to take up arms in defence

of the Fatherland! It is necessary to read them, fully to understand

the pitch excitement had now reached in Germany; all the young men

between the ages of seventeen and twenty-four, were to take up arms,

and form volunteer corps, clothed in the dress that had been worn by

Schill and Stein, that is, the short frock girded with a leathern belt,

and the little cap usually worn by students. No youth could be married

unless he had performed this service, nor could he fill any public

situation unless he had discharged his duty to his country; without

this there was no hope for him, either in the path of ambition or of

love. The patriotic edicts were signed by Hardenberg, who was desirous

of placing himself at the head of popular feeling in Prussia. They were

thus worded:--"The dangers with which the state is threatened demand

an immediate augmentation of our military force, at the same time that

the state of our finances forbids any increase of our expenditure. The

subjects of Prussia have always been distinguished for their attachment

to their king and country, and they require nothing to direct them to

a determined object but a favourable occasion, which may enable our

brave youth to display the courage which leads them to join the ranks

of the ancient defenders of their native land, and acquit themselves

at their side, of their first and noblest duties. It is with this

object, that his majesty has been pleased to command the formation of

detachments of yagers, intended to be annexed to the battalions of

infantry and the regiments of cavalry of which the army is composed,

so as to summon to military service those classes of the inhabitants

of the country who are not compelled to it by the laws, and yet whose

means permit them, to clothe and equip themselves at their own expense,

and to serve the state in a manner compatible with their situation

regarding the civil government. It will also afford an opportunity to

young men of education to distinguish themselves, and become some day

clever officers, or non-commissioned officers."

The spirit of Prussia was now thoroughly roused and up in arms. At the

same time Baron Hardenberg was engaged in a negotiation with M. Maret,

who did not perceive that the Prussian cabinet was merely following the

stream--that it was, in fact, no longer the king who governed, but the

people, and that the people were boiling with indignation. Generally

speaking, the functionaries of the empire did not attach sufficient

importance to public opinion; the greater part of them, forsooth, were

too great people, men of too illustrious birth, as every one is aware,

and they looked down upon the mass of the nation! These men, born of

the people, raised by them--some being old newspaper-writers, others

scriveners, or retired attorneys--considered themselves, by the grace

of God, such great lords and princes, that they paid no attention to

the vast power which gives laws to kings and states. When Hardenberg

wrote that he was desirous of forming the plan of an alliance, even

after the campaign of Moscow, M. Maret's mind was quite at ease on

the subject of Prussia; and the diplomatic despatches give sufficient

evidence of the perfect ignorance that existed at Paris as to the

approaching movement at Berlin: they did not observe that fresh ideas

were becoming developed, and that the cabinet was no longer master of

the country. "What is going to happen?" wrote M. de Saint-Marsan to

the Prussian minister; and, as his sole answer, the latter despatched

General Krusemarck and Prince Hatzfeld to Paris, bearing soothing

words. "Prussia is desirous of maintaining peace, and the French

alliance is pleasing to her, but she requires fresh conditions." Read

this note from Hardenberg to M. de Saint-Marsan, which describes

perfectly the situation of Prussia, a situation M. Maret had not

understood:--"It has occurred to the king, that nothing would more

advance the great work than a truce, according to which the French and

Russian armies would retire to a certain distance, and establish lines

of demarcation, leaving an intervening country. Would his imperial

majesty be willing to enter into such an arrangement? Would he consent

to resign the charge of the fortresses of the Oder, of Pilau, and of

Dantzic (with regard to the latter, conjointly with the Saxon troops,

as agreed by the treaty of Tilsit), to the troops of the king, and

withdraw his army beyond the Elbe, provided the Emperor Alexander

should withdraw his beyond the Vistula? The king has commanded General

Krusemarck and Prince Hatzfeld to inquire into the intentions of his

imperial majesty on this head; and he has made similar proposals to

the Emperor Alexander, as concerning an idea emanating entirely from

himself, and which can in no way compromise the resolution which your

sovereign, his imperial majesty, may come to on this point. According

to what is decided upon at present, the king will regulate his ulterior

proceedings."

Although Hardenberg's language was somewhat timid, matters were,

nevertheless, in a state of progression. In her first position, the

situation of Prussia was that of an ally; in the second, that of

a neutral power: would she stop there? The arrival of the Emperor

Alexander at Breslau decided the king upon following the popular

movement, and the court of Berlin pronounced in favour of the

coalition; information being conveyed to M. Maret, in a paper drawn

up by Hardenberg, that Prussia had declared war. This remarkable

exposition of their causes of complaint against Napoleon contains, more

especially, a summary of pecuniary grievances, unheard-of violations of

the various clauses of the treaty, and recollections of the harsh rule

of the French generals. One circumstance, however, is omitted, although

it occupied the first place in the mind of the Prussian minister, viz.

that the country was weary of foreign dominion. The _Tugendbund_ had

arisen, like an ancient German warrior, armed at all points.

Hardenberg quickly followed up this first despatch by a second,

addressed to General Krusemarck at Paris, who transmitted it to M.

Maret. "The Emperor of Russia offers a noble and faithful friendship

to Prussia, while Napoleon has thrust away his ally, not even having

condescended to enter into any explanation with her. Prussia has

endured all the insolence unsparingly heaped upon her by the conqueror;

all her fortified places have been seized by the French troops; Berlin

has been occupied, and 94 millions levied upon the country. These

circumstances render further hesitation impossible; honour commands us

to draw the sword, and never will we sheath it until an honourable and

advantageous peace has been obtained."

The Diplomatists of Europe · 第 20 / 28 段