CHAPTER I.

THE

EMANCIPATION OF SOUTH AMERICA

“Serás lo que debes ser,

Y sinó, no serás nada.”

SAN MARTIN.

THE EMANCIPATION OF

SOUTH AMERICA

_BEING A CONDENSED TRANSLATION_

BY

WILLIAM PILLING

OF

THE HISTORY OF SAN MARTIN

BY

GENERAL DON BARTOLOMÉ MITRE

FIRST CONSTITUTIONAL PRESIDENT OF THE ARGENTINE REPUBLIC

With Maps

LONDON: CHAPMAN & HALL, LTD.

1893

TRANSLATOR’S PREFACE.

The title of this translation is the second title of the original

“History of San Martin.” This transposition of title is an index to the

relation which the translation bears to the original. This latter is

truly a biography of San Martin, whose life could not be understood

unless very full account were given of the events in which he took so

prominent a part, therefore the biography is also a history.

No man who plays a prominent part in the history of a revolution can

escape becoming involved in disputes with his contemporaries, and in

many intricate questions which are of interest only to a very small

number of their successors. These disputes and these questions greatly

affect the career of a man, but have small influence upon the history of

a Nation. Of such troubles San Martin had his full share, his biographer

has entered fully into them, and with much detail has given proofs of

the correctness of the view he takes of them. These details are, for the

most part, suppressed in the translation, and all matters concerning San

Martin himself are greatly curtailed, while prominence is given to the

events of the times in which the scene passes. The translation is thus

a history in which enter the biographies of the two principal

personages, San Martin and Bolívar.

This translation is intended only for the general mass of

English-speaking readers, to whom minute details are wearisome, and is

thus in every part a condensation of the copious accounts which are

given in the original of the stirring events described. The student of

history will not find in it that ample information which he requires, in

order fully to understand the subject in all its bearings; for him the

original provides a mine of historic wealth, enriched as it is with

notes and with a voluminous appendix.

WILLIAM PILLING.

LONDON, _March, 1893_.

CONTENTS.

.....PAGE

TRANSLATOR’S PREFACE.....vii

PROLOGUE.....xxvii

CHAPTER I.

HISTORICAL INTRODUCTION.

The Argument of the Book--Synopsis of the South American

Revolution--The Action of America upon Europe--The Colonization

of Spanish America--The Colonization of North America--Colonial

Policy in both Americas--The Emancipation of North America--The

Affiliation of the Revolution of South America--The Moral Revolution

of South America--The Precursor of the Emancipation of South

America--The Races of South America; the Creole--The First Throes of

Revolution--The Growth of the Revolution--Attempts at Monarchy in

South America--Retrospection.....1

CHAPTER II.

SAN MARTIN IN EUROPE AND IN AMERICA.

1778--1812.

His Birth and Parentage--Leaves for Spain--His Career in the

Spanish Army--Africa--France--St. Vincent--Portugal--Cadiz--Society

of Lautaro--Argonilla--Baylen--Tudela--Albuera--Lord

Macduff--London--Buenos Ayres--Outbreak of the Revolution--Experiments

in Government--The Influence of San Martin--Personal Appearance and

Character of San Martin.....31

CHAPTER III.

THE LAUTARO LODGE.

1812--1813. PAGE

The First Triumvirate--Political Parties--The Mounted

Grenadiers--Military School--The Lautaro Lodge--Battle of

Tucuman--Revolution of 8th October--The Second Triumvirate--Military

Plans.....43

CHAPTER IV.

SAN LORENZO.

1813--1814.

Battle of the Cerrito--Meeting of the Constituent

Assembly--Reforms--Spanish Depredations on the Fluvial Coasts--The

Action of San Lorenzo--Battle of Salta--Influence of the

Lodge--Disasters of Vilcapugio and Ayohuma--Argentine Generals--San

Martin takes Command of the Army of the North--Appointment of the

Supreme Director.....53

CHAPTER V.

UPPER PERU.

1814.

The Problem of the Argentine Revolution--The Geography and Ethnology

of Upper Peru--Outbreak and Progress of the Revolution in Upper

Peru--Cruelties of the Spaniards--Composition of the Royalist

Army--Arenales--His campaign from Cochabamba to Santa Cruz--Battle of

La Florida--Results of these Operations.....64

CHAPTER VI.

THE WAR IN THE NORTH.

1814.

The Army of Tucuman--Preparations of Pezuela--Plans of San Martin--The

New Military School--Popular Movement in Salta--Martin Güemes--The

Gauchos of Salta--Operations of the Royalists--The Fall of Monte

Video--Retreat of Pezuela--San Martin’s Secret Plan--His Illness--Is

appointed Governor of Cuyo.....72

CHAPTER VII.

THE CHILENO-ARGENTINE REVOLUTION.

1810--1811.

Chilian and Argentine Society compared--Martinez Rozas--Popular

Excitement--Loss of Power by Governor Carrasco--The South of

Chile--O’Higgins--Deposition of Carrasco--Establishment of a

Junta--Resemblances of the Two Revolutions--Argentine-Chilian

Alliance--Freedom of Commerce--Mutiny in Santiago--Installation

of the First General Congress--Defeat of the Radicals--Rozas at

Conception.....80

CHAPTER VIII.

PROGRESS AND FALL OF THE CHILIAN REVOLUTION.

1811--1814.

The Three Carreras--A New Junta--Dissolution of Congress--Armed

Protest by Rozas--Valdivia--The First Newspaper--Death of Rozas--The

Chilian Flag--Carrera again Dictator--Abascal--Pareja lands at

Valdivia--Battle of San Carlos--Siege of Chillán--O’Higgins

made General-in-Chief--Argentine Auxiliaries--Arrival of

Gainza--Lastra named Supreme Director--Capture of Talca--Mackenna

at Membrillar--Defence of Quecheraguas--Mediation of the British

Commodore--Treaty of Lircay--The Carreras again in Power--Invasion of

Osorio--Siege of Rancagua--Flight of O’Higgins and Carrera.....91

CHAPTER IX.

CUYO.

1814--1815.

The District of Cuyo--Policy of San Martin--Reception of Chilian

Refugees--Trouble with Carrera--Fall of Alvear--Cuyo becomes an

Independent State--Self-sacrifice of the People of Cuyo--Revenues of

Cuyo--Characteristics of San Martin--Anecdotes of San Martin--Royalist

Successes--The Banquet at Mendoza.....108

CHAPTER X.

THE SPY SYSTEM OF THE PATRIOTS.

1815--1816.

The Restoration of Spanish Domination in Chile--Cruelties of the

Royalists--Nationalist Reaction--The Plans of Abascal--San Martin

establishes Secret Agencies in Chile--His Spy System--Preparations

of the Chilian Patriots--Marcó del Pont--Manuel Rodriguez--Brown

and the Argentine Privateers--Loss of the _Uribe_--Capture of the

_Consequencia_--Blockade of Callao--Attack on Guayaquil--Loss of the

_Trinidad_--Return of the Squadron.....117

CHAPTER XI.

THE IDEA OF THE PASSAGE OF THE ANDES.

1815--1816.

Opposition to the Plans of San Martin--He receives Permission to

assume the Offensive--Also Supplies of Guns and War Material--Collects

the Grenadiers--Balcarce Provisional Director--The Lodge in

Mendoza--Tomas Guido.....124

CHAPTER XII.

THE ARMY OF THE ANDES.

1816--1817.

Composition of the Army--Freeing the Slaves--Fray Beltran--The

Arsenal--Powder Factory--Cloth Factory--Pueyrredón elected

President--Declaration of Independence--Interview at

Córdoba--Condarco--Maps of the Passes of the Andes--Concentration of

the Army--The Function of the 17th January, 1817--The Flag of the Army

of the Andes.....126

CHAPTER XIII.

THE PASSAGE OF THE ANDES.

1817.

The Southern Andes--Passes of the Andes--Stratagems of San

Martin--The Pehuenche Indians--Preparations of Marcó--Preparations at

Mendoza--Pueyrredón--Detachments flanking the Main Army--Instructions

from Government--The Sierra of Chacabuco--Occupation of Coquimbo

by Cabot--Capture of Copiapó--Capture of Talca--March of the

Main Army--The Affair at Pichueta--Capture of Achupallas--Juan

Lavalle--Capture of the Guardia Vieja--Putaendo--Defeat of

Atero--Concentration of the Army at the Foot of Chacabuco--The

Judgment of Posterity.....132

CHAPTER XIV.

CHACABUCO.

1817.

The Sierra of Chacabuco--Atero occupies Chacabuco--Maroto appointed

to command the Royalist Army--Moonlight March of the Patriots--The

Royalist Vanguard driven in--Advance of the Main Body--Repulse of

O’Higgins--Soler takes the Position in Flank--Total Rout of the

Royalists--Barañao--Occupation of Santiago--O’Higgins elected Supreme

Director--Marcó taken Prisoner--San Bruno shot--Reception of the News

in Buenos Ayres--San Martin returns to Buenos Ayres.....144

CHAPTER XV.

THE FIRST CAMPAIGN IN THE SOUTH OF CHILE.

1817.

The Mistakes committed by San Martin--Ordoñez--Las Heras marches to

the South--Occupation of Concepcion--The Action of Gavilán--O’Higgins

takes Command--Freyre captures the Forts of Arauco--Treaty with the

Indians of Arauco--Operations against Talcahuano--French Officers--The

Assault of the Morro--Las Heras is withdrawn from the captured

Outwork.....151

CHAPTER XVI.

ARGENTINE-CHILENO ALLIANCE.

1817.

Origin and Results of this Alliance--San Martin in Buenos

Ayres--Carrera’s Trip to North America--His Return and Arrest by

Pueyrredón--The Mission of Condarco to London--Quintana Deputy

Director--Coinage of Chilian Money--“The Legion of Merit”--Guido

as Argentine Representative--Irizarri appointed Chilian Agent

in Europe--Monarchical Ideas--Chilian Jealousy of Argentine

Influence--The Conspiracy of the Carreras--Two of the Brothers

imprisoned at Mendoza--Life of San Martin at Santiago--The

“Tertulias”--Commodore Bowles takes a Secret Agent to Lima.....157

CHAPTER XVII.

CANCHA-RAYADA.

1817--1818. PAGE

The Political State of Chile--Pezuela appointed Viceroy of Peru--His

Policy--Osorio lands at Talcahuano with Reinforcements--The

Patriot Forces--Retreat of O’Higgins--March of Osorio on

Santiago--Proclamation of Independence--Concentration of the

Patriot Army--Affair on the Lontué--Retreat of Osorio--The Halt at

Talca--The Night Attack at Cancha-rayada--Dispersion of the Patriot

Army--O’Higgins wounded--Masterly Retreat of Las Heras--Panic in the

Capital--Return of O’Higgins and San Martin--Reorganization of the

Army--The Camp on the Plain of Maipó.....165

CHAPTER XVIII.

MAIPÓ.

1818.

Confusion of the Royalists after Cancha-rayada--They march on

Santiago--The Plain of Maipó--Position of the Patriots--Desertion

of General Brayer--Battle of Maipó--Results of the Battle--Osorio

collects a Small Force at Talcahuano--Zapiola takes Command in the

South--Osorio evacuates Talcahuano.....174

CHAPTER XIX.

AFTER MAIPÓ.

1818.

Execution at Mendoza of Don Luis and Don Juan José

Carrera--Constitutional Reform in Chile--Tragic Fate of Dr.

Rodriguez--The Secret Correspondence of Osorio--San Martin leaves

for Buenos Ayres--His Arrangements with Pueyrredón--Monarchical

Illusions--Bolívar--Spain.....181

CHAPTER XX.

THE FIRST NAVAL CAMPAIGN ON THE PACIFIC.

1818.

The Naval Resources of Chile--Ships purchased by Government--Affair

of the _Esmeralda_--Blanco Encalada--Another Convoy from Spain--The

Mutiny of the _Trinidad_--The Chilian Squadron leaves Valparaiso--The

Capture of the _Maria Isabel_--Capture of Five Transports--The Return

of the Squadron--Cochrane--The Two Wives.....186

CHAPTER XXI.

THE REPASSAGE OF THE ANDES.

1818--1819.

The Last Campaign in Chile--Another Conspiracy of

Carrera’s--Proclamation to the Peruvian People--Correspondence with

Bolívar--San Martin withdraws a Division to Mendoza--The Tragedy at

San Luis--Definite Arrangements for the Expedition to Peru--Retirement

of Pueyrredón.....194

CHAPTER XXII.

COCHRANE--CALLAO--VALDIVIA.

1819--1820.

The Character of Cochrane--He sails for Callao--The Spanish

Squadron--The First Attack on Callao--Loss of a Fireship--Capture

of the _Montezuma_--Return to Valparaiso--Manufacture of

War Rockets--Second Attack on Callao--Inefficiency of the

Rockets--Guise captures Pisco--Death of Colonel Charles--Capture

of Transports at Guayaquil--Escape of the _Prueba_--Cochrane’s

New Scheme--Valdivia--Capture of the _Potrillo_--Reinforcements

at Talcahuano--Return to Valdivia--Capture of the Southern

Forts--Evacuation of the Northern Forts--Wreck of the

_Intrepido_--Surrender of the City--Repulse at Chiloe--Return.....200

CHAPTER XXIII.

THE DISOBEDIENCE OF SAN MARTIN.

1819--1820.

The Perplexities of San Martin--Popular Sentiment in Spain--The

Expedition assembling at Cadiz--Discontent among the Troops--O’Donnell

crushes the Conspiracy--San Martin summoned to Buenos Ayres--His

Proposal to O’Higgins and Cochrane--The Gaucho Chieftains--San

Martin again ordered to Buenos Ayres--The Plans of Government--The

Duc de Luca--Uprising of the Argentine People--San Martin still

hesitates--Mutiny of the Army of the North--San Martin sends in his

Resignation--Critique on his Behaviour.....210

CHAPTER XXIV.

THE CONVENTION OF RANCAGUA.

1820.

The Spanish Revolution of 1820--Return of San Martin to Chile--Mutiny

of the Detachment at San Juan--The Remnant of the Division crosses the

Andes to Chile--Rout of Cepeda--The Reign of Anarchy in the United

Provinces--The Convention of Officers at Rancagua--The Disobedience

of San Martin endorsed by the Army--Cochrane aspires to the

Command-in-Chief--San Martin appointed Generalissimo--The Presence of

the Army of the Andes a Danger to Chile.....216

CHAPTER XXV.

PERU.

1820.

The Colonial Era in Peru--Lima--The Peruvian People--Viceroy

Abascal--The Native Army--Pezuela--La Serna--Revolutionary

Outbreaks--The Insurrection of Cuzco--Secret

Societies--Correspondence with San Martin--Dissolution of the Native

Army--Olañeta--Camba--Valdés--The Royalist Forces.....223

CHAPTER XXVI.

THE EXPEDITION TO PERU.

1820.

San Martin’s Address to the Argentine People--Composition of

the Expedition--Sailing of the Expedition--Disembarkation at

Pisco--Occupation of Pisco by Las Heras--Proclamation by San

Martin--Pezuela proposes Peace--The Commissioners meet at

Miraflores--Arrange an Armistice--The Terms proposed--Negotiations

broken off--Expedition of Arenales to the Highlands--Re-embarkation of

the Army.....230

CHAPTER XXVII.

THE OPENING OF THE CAMPAIGN.

1820--1821.

The Coming Campaigns--The Pageant at Callao--Expedition from

Ancon--Guayaquil--Revolution of Guayaquil--The _Esmeralda_

Frigate cut out by Cochrane--The Expedition lands at

Huacho--Huara--Cavalry Skirmish at Chancay--The Numancia Battalion

joins the Patriots--Discontent in Peru--The Independence of

Trujillo--Torre-Tagle--Junction with Arenales--The Guerillas--The

Provisional Regulation.....235

CHAPTER XXVIII.

THE FIRST CAMPAIGN IN THE HIGHLANDS.

1820--1821.

The Natural Division of Peru--The Highlands of Peru--The Flying Column

under Arenales--Defeat of Quimper--The Invasion of the Highlands--The

Battle of Pasco--Retreat of Aldao from Ica--Massacres of Indians by

Ricafort--The Sack of Cangallo and Huancayo--Aldao establishes himself

at Huancayo--Arenales rejoins San Martin.....245

CHAPTER XXIX.

THE ARMISTICE OF PUNCHAUCA.

1821.

Prospects of the Royalists--Spanish Councils of War--Deposition

of Pezuela--Proposals of Peace--The Conference at Retes--State of

the Two Armies--The Royal Commissioner--The Patriot Army moves to

Ancon--Proclamation from King Ferdinand--Effect in Columbia--Effect

in Mexico--Course of the Revolution in Mexico--Iturbide--The “Plan

de Iguala”--Success of the Plan--Fate of Iturbide--The Conference

of Punchauca--Armistice of Punchauca--Interview between San Martin

and La Serna--Mistaken Policy of San Martin--The Conference

renewed at Miraflores--Prolongation of the Armistice--Captain

Basil Hall--Canterac moves to the Highlands--Return of the Patriot

Army to Huacho--La Serna evacuates Lima--Occupation of Lima by the

Patriots--Proclamation and Inactivity of San Martin.....249

CHAPTER XXX.

THE SECOND CAMPAIGN IN THE HIGHLANDS.

1821.

Aldao and his Indian Levies--Gamarra takes Command--Is driven out by

Ricafort--Ricafort returns to Lima--Arenales marches from Huara--The

Successes of Arenales cut short by the Armistice--Character of

Arenales--His Expostulations against the Mistaken Policy of San Martin

being unheeded he rejoins him at Lima--Repulse of La Serna by the

Mountaineers of Jauja.....261

CHAPTER XXXI.

THE EXPEDITION TO THE SOUTH.

1821.

Conspiracy to capture Callao--Miller sent South with a small

Force--Lands at Pisco--Insurrection at Cuzco--Cochrane applies

to Chile for Aid--Ravages of Fever at Chincha--Cochrane sails

for Arica--Capture of Arica--Evacuation of Tacna--Miller marches

Inland--Capture of Mirave--Occupation of Moquegua--Miller retreats to

Tacna and to Arica--Miller establishes himself at Ica--Loss of the

_San Martin_.....265

CHAPTER XXXII.

PERU INDEPENDENT.

1821.

The Continental Campaign--Lack of National Spirit in Peru--Convention

of Notables at Lima--Declaration of Independence--Capture of Ships

by Cochrane at Callao--Attempted Surprise by Las Heras--Overtures

of Cochrane to La Mar--San Martin appoints himself “Protector

of Peru”--Decree against the Spaniards--Banishment of the

Archbishop--Tragic Fate of José Miguel Carrera.....270

CHAPTER XXXIII.

THE PROTECTORATE OF PERU.

1821--1822.

The Captain of the Army of the Andes--Royalist Expedition for the

Relief of Callao--The Defile of Espiritu Santo--Outburst of Enthusiasm

in Lima--Manœuvres in Front of Lima--Retreat of Canterac--Feeble

Pursuit of the Royalists--Capitulation of Callao--Reforms of

San Martin--The Order of the Sun--Deterioration in the Spirit

of the Army--Subsidy from the City of Lima--Conspiracy in the

Army--Monarchical Ideas of San Martin--Monteagudo and the “Patriotic

Society of Lima”--Mission of Garcia del Rio to Europe.....277

CHAPTER XXXIV.

SAN MARTIN AND COCHRANE.

1821--1822.

Mutual Invectives of Two Heroes--San Martin fails to fulfil

his Promises to the Fleet--A Stormy Interview--Cochrane seizes

Treasure--Cochrane pays his Men with Government Funds--And sails

for Guayaquil--Surrender of Two Spanish Frigates to Peruvian

Agents--Cochrane attempts to seize the _Venganza_--Returns to Callao

and Captures the _Montezuma_--Returns to Chile and abandons the

Pacific--The New Peruvian Navy.....287

CHAPTER XXXV.

THE DISASTER AT ICA.

1821--1822.

Royalist Headquarters established at Cuzco--Expedition under Loriga

against Pasco--Defeat of Otero--Burning of Cangallo--San Martin

sends a Contingent to the Assistance of Bolívar--And Summons the

First Peruvian Congress--Torre-Tagle Deputy-Protector--Expedition

to Ica--Rout of the Patriots by Canterac--Barbarous Treatment of

Spaniards by Monteagudo.....292

CHAPTER XXXVI.

THE REVOLUTIONS IN QUITO AND VENEZUELA.

1809--1812.

The Northern Zone of South America--The First Outbreak

at Quito--The Revolution at Caracas--Commencement of the

Reaction--SIMON BOLÍVAR--His Appearance and Character--His

Education--His First Visit to Europe--His Second Visit to

Europe--His Life at Caracas--Reception of the Envoys by the British

Government--Bolívar meets Miranda in London--Brings him back with

him to Venezuela--Action of the Regency of Cadiz--The Patriot

Junta sends an Army against Coro--Reception of Miranda--His Plan

for a Constitution--First Congress of Venezuela--Declaration of

Independence--Revolt of the Canarians--Revolt at Valencia--Capture

of Valencia by Miranda--Adoption of a Federal Constitution--General

Discontent--Carora sacked by Monteverde--The Royalists of

Guayana--Destruction of the Patriot Flotilla--The Great

Earthquake--San Carlos burned by Monteverde--Miranda is appointed

Dictator--Successes of the Royalists--Monteverde is repulsed in

an Attack on the Entrenched Camp at Victoria--Insurrection of the

Slaves--Loss of Puerto-Cabello--Miranda treats for Peace--The

Capitulation--Miranda is imprisoned by his Officers--Cruelties of

Monteverde--Death of Miranda.....296

CHAPTER XXXVII.

THE REVOLUTIONS IN NEW GRANADA AND QUITO.

1809--1813.

Excitement in New Granada--Expedition against Quito--Reinstallation

of the late Captain-General of Quito--Massacres by the

Royalist Soldiery--Revolution at Cartagena--Outbreak on the

Plains of Casanare--A Junta established at Pamplona--And at

Socorro--Pacific Revolution at Bogotá--Establishment of a

Junta--Social Anarchy--Proposals to summon a Congress--The State

of Cundinamarca--Nariño appointed Dictator--Congress adopts the

Federal System of Government and retires to Ibague--The Province

of Cartagena declares itself an Independent State--Preparations

of the Royalists--Torices named Dictator of Cartagena--Operations

against Santa Marta--Arrival of a New Viceroy--The First Victory

of the Patriots--Another Insurrection in Quito--Successes of

Montufar and Macaulay--Treachery of the Pastusos--La Vendée of

the Revolution--Installation of a Junta at Quito--Operations in

the South--Quito declares itself an Independent State--Murder

of Ruiz de Castillo--Victory of the Royalists at Mocha--Capture

of Quito--Massacres at Popayán--The Policy of Nariño--The

Congress at Leiva--Dr. Camilo Torres named President--Civil

War--Arrival of another Viceroy--Cundinamarca and Antioquia

declare themselves Independent States--Congress places Nariño

in Command of the Army--Successes of Nariño--His Passage of the

River Juanambú--Dispersion of his Army--He is sent in Irons to

Spain--Operations of Bolívar against Santa Marta--Defeat of an

Expedition from Cartagena--Bolívar conceives the Idea of Reconquering

Venezuela--He crosses the Cordillera--His Memorial to the People of

New Granada--President Torres adopts his Idea.....312

CHAPTER XXXVIII.

THE RECONQUEST OF VENEZUELA.

1813.

“Pacification” by Monteverde--The Signal for Revolt--Triste--The

Expedition to the Mainland--Cruelties of Zuazola--Defeat of the

Royalists at Maturin--The Island of Margarita--Arismendi--Siege

of Cumaná--Cajigal retreats to Guayana--Mariño named Dictator

of the Eastern Provinces--The Expedition of Briceño--Defeat of

Correa by Castillo--Bolívar’s Commission from the Congress of

Granada--Capture of Mérida and Trujillo--Bolívar fulminates a Decree

of Extermination against all Royalists--Marti Defeated by Rivas--Rout

of Izquierdo--Valencia and Caracas evacuated by Royalists--The Genius

of Bolívar--His Triumphant Entry into Caracas--He proclaims Himself

Dictator--Lays Siege to Puerto Cabello--The Reaction--Second Decree

of Bolívar--Arrival of Reinforcements at Puerto Cabello--Death

of Girardot--Victory of Las Trincheras--Honours to Bolívar at

Caracas--The Order of the “Liberators”--Boves, Morales, and

Yañez--They rouse the Llaneros--Campo-Elias--Defeat of Boves

at Mosquitero--Massacre of Royalists at Calabozo--Repulse of

Patriots at Barquisimeto--Battle of Araure--Effects of the Dual

Dictatorship--Reappearance of Boves on the Scene--The Patriots are

driven from the Plains--General Revulsion of Feeling.....324

CHAPTER XXXIX.

THE SECOND FALL OF VENEZUELA.

1814.

Bolívar discloses a New Phase of his Character--The Assembly of

Caracas--His Treaty with Mariño--Defeat and Death of Yañez--Action

at La Puerta--Repulse of Morales at Victoria--Successes of

Rivas--The Massacres of Caracas and La Guayra--Preparations of

Bolívar--His Defence of the Entrenchments of San Mateo--Heroism of

Recaurte--Defence of Caracas by Rivas--Of Valencia by Urdaneta--Action

at Boca Chica--Mariño defeated at San Carlos--First Battle at

Carabobo--Rout of the Patriots at La Puerta--Capitulation of

Valencia--D’Eluyar raises the Siege of Puerto-Cabello--Bolívar

evacuates Caracas--Entrenches Himself at Aragua--Retreats to

Barcelona--Capture of Aragua by Morales--Bolívar is accused of

Treachery--Retires to Curaçoa--Repulse of Morales at Maturin--Massacre

at Cumaná--Rout of the Patriots at Urica--Death of Boves--Capture

of Maturin by Morales--Death of Rivas--The Last Patriot Army under

Urdaneta seeks Refuge in New Granada.....343

CHAPTER XL.

THE DISSOLUTION OF NEW GRANADA.

1815--1817.

The Fall of Constitutional Government in Spain--Jealousy of Native

Troops--Bolívar takes Command of the Army of New Granada--Capture of

Bogotá--Fresh Honours to Bolívar--Bolívar makes War on Cartagena--And

retires to Jamaica--His Memorials--Morillo arrives from Spain with a

Powerful Squadron, and takes Command of the Royalists--Miyares secures

the Isthmus of Panamá--Morillo’s Instructions--Reduction of the Island

of Margarita--Loss of the _San Pedro_--Morillo occupies Caracas--And

sails thence for Cartagena--Cartagena--The Siege of Cartagena--The

Fortress and City are evacuated by the Patriots--Repulse of Calzada

from the Plains of Casanare--Defeat of the Patriots at Balaga--Further

Successes of Calzada--Madrid is defeated by Sámano in the South--Fresh

Disturbances in Venezuela--Offers of Amnesty--Establishment

of Military Rule at Bogotá--Executions--Morillo returns to

Venezuela--Cruelties of Sámano--Death of La Pola--Sámano is appointed

Viceroy by Morillo.....353

CHAPTER XLI.

THE THIRD WAR IN VENEZUELA.

1815--1817.

Position of Affairs in Venezuela--The Fresh Outbreak on the Island

of Margarita--Paez--His First Action--Revulsion of Opinion among

the Llaneros--The Army of the Apure--Successes of Cedeño--Attempt

to assassinate Bolívar--Bolívar goes to Haití--The Expedition from

Cayos--The Landing at Margarita--Bolívar is named Supreme Chief--The

Expedition proceeds to Carúpano--Bolívar proceeds to Ocumare--Defeat

of Bolívar by Morales--Bolívar’s Flight from Ocumare--Successes of

MacGregor--The Army of the Centre--Bolívar returns to Haiti--Defeat of

Lopez by MacGregor--Piar defeats Morales at Juncal--Paez lays Siege to

San Fernando--The Spaniards evacuate the Island of Margarita--Bolívar

leaves Haití with a Second Expedition--Piar marches on Guayana--Forces

the Passage of the Cauca--Occupies the Missions of Coroní--Bolívar

again defeated--And leaves for Guayana--Capture of Barcelona by

the Royalists--The True Base of Operations--Advance of La Torre

from New Granada--Is totally defeated by Paez--And descends the

River to Angostura--Is again defeated by Piar at San Felix--Mariño

summons a Congress--Morillo puts an End to the Farce--Brion forces

his Way up the Orinoco--Flight of La Torre--Conspiracy of Piar and

Mariño--Execution of Piar--Banishment of Mariño.....365

CHAPTER XLII.

THE REORGANIZATION OF VENEZUELA.

1817--1819.

The Expedition of Morillo and Canterac against the Island

of Margarita--The Action at Matasiete--The Massacre at Juan

Griego--Morillo returns to Caracas--Position of Patriots and of

Royalists--The Civil Administration of Bolívar--Rout of Saraza

at Hogaza--The Horse Marines--Bolívar surprises Morillo at

Calabozo--Retreat of the Royalists to Sombrero--Defeat of Bolívar

at La Puerta--Capture of San Fernando by Paez--Defeat of Paez at

Cojedes--Defeat of Cedeño by Morales--And of Morales by Paez--Mariño

takes Cumaná, and refuses Allegiance to the Liberator--Bolívar

raises a New Army, and is reconciled to Mariño--Santander sent

to Casanare--Bolívar’s Idea of a Constitution--The Congress

of Angostura--Bolívar is named President of Venezuela--The

Foreign Auxiliaries--Luis Mendez--Colonel Hippisley--Colonel

Wilson--Campbell--Gilmour--General English--Colonel Elsom--General

MacGregor--General Devereux--Colonel Montilla--Morillo opens the

Campaign--Tactics of Paez--Morillo reoccupies San Fernando--The Affair

of “Las Queseras del Medio”--Bolívar’s New Idea.....380

CHAPTER XLIII.

BOYACA--COLUMBIA--CARABOBO.

1819--1822.

Bolívar joins Santander--The Passage of the Cordillera--The

Expedition halts in the Valley of Sagamoso--Skilful Manœuvres of

Bolívar--He captures the City of Tunja--Battle of Boyacá--Bolívar

occupies Bogotá--His Activity and the Honours paid Him--Founds the

Republic of Columbia--Cruelty of Santander--Bolívar returns to

Angostura--Changes during his Absence--Decrees of Congress--Bolívar

named Provisional President of Columbia--Military Operations on

the North Coast--Arrival of the Irish Legion at Margarita--Paez

retakes San Fernando--The Armistice of Trujillo--Morillo returns to

Spain--Revolution in Maracaibo--Operations of Montilla--Bolívar again

takes the Field--Battle of Carabobo--Bolívar for the Second Time

enters Caracas in Triumph--The Constituent Congress--Bolívar is named

President--Capitulation of Cartagena--The Provinces of the Isthmus

declare their Independence--Fall of Chagres and Portobello--Bolívar

leaves for the South--Activity of Morales--He capitulates--Puerto

Cabello is taken by Paez.....394

CHAPTER XLIV.

THE WAR IN QUITO.

1821--1822.

Operations in the South of Columbia--Sucre--He leads an Expedition to

Guayaquil--His Victory at Yahuachí--His Defeat at Ambato--Arrival of

Murgeón from Spain--Bolívar marches on Quito with a Fresh Army--Battle

of Bomboná--He retreats to Patia--San Martin sends a Contingent to

aid Sucre--Manœuvres of the Opposing Armies--The Cavalry Affair at

Rio Bamba--Battle of Pichincha--Surrender of Quito--Capitulation of

Garcia and of the Pastusos--Prætorianism--Bolívar enters Quito in

Triumph.....406

CHAPTER XLV.

GUAYAQUIL.

1822.

The Meeting and Merging of Two Revolutions--The Protectorate of

Guayaquil--Defeat of the Provincial Army at Ambato--Arrival of

Sucre--The Revolt of Puerto-Viejo--Arrival of Salazar--La Mar takes

Command of the Provincial Forces--The Question of Guayaquil.....414

CHAPTER XLVI.

THE INTERVIEW AT GUAYAQUIL.

1822.

The Influence of Individuals--The Illusions of San Martin--Bolívar

becomes jealous of Argentine Influence--The Entry of Bolívar into

Guayaquil--He annexes the Province to Columbia--The Arrival of San

Martin--The Conference--The Banquet--The Ball--Departure of San

Martin--Result of the Conference--Remarkable Letter from San Martin to

Bolívar.....418

CHAPTER XLVII.

THE ABDICATION OF SAN MARTIN.

1822.

Disturbances in Lima--Banishment of Monteagudo--Return of San

Martin--The First Congress of Peru--The Resignation of San

Martin--Honours decreed to him by Congress--He leaves Peru--His

Illness in Chile--He retires to Mendoza.....426

CHAPTER XLVIII.

THE FIRST NATIONAL GOVERNMENT OF PERU.

1822--1823.

The State of Peru--Appointment of a Junta--Bolívar offers

Assistance, which is declined--The Plan of Campaign--The Army of

the South--Dilatory Movements of Alvarado--The Advance of the

Royalists--Battle of Torata--The Rout of Moquegua--Activity of

Miller--Withdrawal of the Columbian Contingent--Arenales leaves

Peru--Riva-Agüero named President--Preparations for a Fresh

Campaign--English Loan--Despatch of a Peruvian Army to the South

under Santa Cruz--Capture of Lima by Canterac--Sucre brings another

Columbian Contingent to Peru--Bolívar is named Generalissimo--Canterac

returns to the Highlands--Plans of Sucre--Manœuvres of Santa

Cruz--He captures La Paz--Gamarra occupies Oruro--Retreat of

Santa Cruz--Indecisive Action at Zepita--Dispersion of the

Patriot Army--Orderly Retreat of Sucre--Appeals to San Martin

for Help--Reconstruction of Congress--Arrival of Bolívar--His

Reception--His Appearance--He is Master of Peru.....431

CHAPTER XLIX.

JUNIN--AYACUCHO.

1823--1824.

The Day-Dreams of Bolívar--Rivadavia--Treaty between Columbia and

Buenos Ayres--Overtures from Spain to Buenos Ayres--The Mission of

Alzaga to the West and North--Treatment of the Argentine Contingent

by Peru--Mutiny of the Garrison of Callao--Hoisting the Flag of

Spain--Falucho--Dissolution of the Army of the Andes--Monet occupies

Lima and Callao--Treachery of Torre-Tagle--Ships burned by Guise in

Harbour--Bolívar named Dictator--Execution of Argentine Officers by

Monet--Illness of Bolívar--His Preparations--Olañeta rebels against

the Viceroy--Bolívar marches on Jauja--Advance of Canterac--Cavalry

Action at Junin--Rapid Retreat of Canterac--Bolívar returns to

Lima--Movement against him in the Congress of Columbia--The

Spanish Naval Squadron--Manœuvres of Sucre--Advance of Royalists

from Cuzco--Sucre concentrates his Forces--The Royalists gain his

Rear--Victory or Death--Victory of Ayacucho.....443

CHAPTER L.

APOGEE, DECLINE, AND FALL OF BOLIVAR.

1824--1830.

Results of the Victory of Ayacucho--The Twofold Nature of the

Revolution--Assassination of Monteagudo--Bolívar summons a Congress

at Panama--His Theatrical Proceedings--Upper Peru becomes an

Independent State--Tendency of the Policy of Bolívar--He leaves

Lima for Potosí--The Banquet at Arequipa--Bolívar meets Argentine

Envoys at Potosí--His Proposals to them--Opinions of the Press

of Buenos Ayres--He draws up a Constitution for Bolivia--Attempt

to assassinate Bolívar at Lima--Adoption of a New Constitution

by Peru--The Grand Confederation of the Andes--The Nature of the

Proposed Monocracy--Revolution in Venezuela--Bolívar Returns to

Columbia--Revolutions in Peru and Bolívia--The Convention of

Ocaña--Bolívar is again named Dictator of New Granada--Conspiracy

against him at Bogotá--He declares War against Peru--His Monarchical

Proposals--Rebellion at Antioquia--Venezuela becomes an Independent

State--The Constituent Congress at Bogotá--Bolívar resigns--Mosquera

is elected President of New Granada--Pension assigned to

Bolívar.....458

EPILOGUE.

The Verdict of Posterity--The Tragedy of Emancipation--San Martin goes

to Europe--His Return to Buenos Ayres--Bolívar in Retirement--Anarchy

in New Granada--Establishment of the Republic of Ecuador--Death of

Bolívar--His Last Words--Life of San Martin in Exile--His Death--His

Remains are brought back to Buenos Ayres--The Work of the Two

Liberators compared--The Nature of True Greatness.....470

TRANSLATOR’S APPENDIX.

I.--The Spanish Colonial System.....477 II.--Personal Appearance

of San Martin.....478 III.--The Rocket-Tubes at Callao.....478

IV.--Description of a Suspension Bridge.....478 V.--The Ideas of San

Martin.....479 VI.--A Venezuelan Picture presented to the City of New

York.....480 VII.--The Battle of Carabobo.....481

BIOGRAPHICAL NOTES.

Alvarado--Arenales--Brown--Cochrane--Güemes--Las

Heras--Lavalle--Miller--Necochea--O’Higgins--Paez.....484

PROLOGUE.

The object of this book is to give a biography of GENERAL JOSÉ DE SAN

MARTIN, combining therewith the history of the emancipation of South

America. It is a necessary complement to the HISTORY OF BELGRANO,

written thirty years ago. These two histories display the Argentine

Revolution in its two principal aspects; one relates the development of

a nation, the other the effect of this development upon the emancipation

of a continent.

This history is based, for the most part, upon documents hitherto

unpublished, some of which are truly posthumous revelations which throw

new light upon mysterious or little known events, or correct errors

resulting from defective information.

I believe I have consulted all the books, pamphlets, newspapers and

fly-sheets which have ever been printed concerning San Martin, and of

manuscripts I have a collection of at least 10,000 documents, bound in

73 thick volumes, which it is my purpose to deposit in the National

Library.

The most important of these sources of information has been the archive

of General San Martin himself, which was placed at my disposal by his

son-in-law, the late Don Mariano Balcarce. I have also consulted the

archives of this city from the year 1812 to the year 1824, without

which it would have been impossible to compile a complete history. The

archives of the Director Pueyrredón, which were given to me by his son,

have also been of great service to me, as also those of General

O’Higgins, Don Tomás Godoy Cruz, General Las Heras, and others. I have

also acquired much verbal information from conversations held with many

of the contemporaries of San Martin, and with some of his companions in

arms.

In addition to consulting all available maps and plans relating to the

campaigns of San Martin, I have inspected in person the routes followed

by the army of the Andes and have made sketches myself of the scene of

memorable events when plans were not forthcoming.

* * * * *

This book will not be the historical monument which posterity will some

day consecrate to the immortal memory of San Martin, but those who do at

some future date erect it, will herein find abundant materials, stones

finished or but roughly cut, with which solidly to lay out the

foundations.

BARTOLOMÉ MITRE.

BUENOS AYRES, 1887.

Here follows, on 25 pages, a list of unpublished manuscripts

consulted in the compilation of this work, which manuscripts will

be deposited in the National Library of Buenos Ayres.

WILLIAM PILLING.

THE EMANCIPATION OF SOUTH AMERICA.

CHAPTER I.

HISTORICAL INTRODUCTION.

THE ARGUMENT OF THE BOOK.

Three great names stand forth conspicuous in the annals of America,

those of WASHINGTON, BOLÍVAR, SAN MARTIN. Of Washington, the great

leader of the Democracy of the North; of Bolívar and of San Martin, who

were the emancipators of the southern half of the continent. The story

of the life-work of the latter of these two is the Argument of this

book.

The scene of action passes on a vast theatre, a territory extending for

more than fifty degrees of latitude, from Cape Horn to the Tropic of

Cancer, and occupies twenty years of strife. The starting-point of this

history is the Argentine revolution; it follows the course of this

revolution as it spreads over the continent, and its object is to

explain the laws which governed the establishment of a family of new

Republics, and the fundamental principles from which they sprang.

This argument is dual and complex, for it treats both of political

revolution and of social evolution. It shows how the Argentine

revolution became a propaganda to the world outside, of the principles

upon which it was based, and how under these auspices independent and

sovereign nations sprang into existence, with forms and tendencies in

the same likeness and similitude. It shows the proclamation of a new

international law, which only permits of alliance against an enemy in

the name of a common destiny, and forbids conquests and annexations. It

shows also the failure of the attempt in Columbia to unite the

emancipated colonies artificially into a monocracy in opposition to

natural law and to the new idea of the rights of man inaugurated by the

Argentine revolution.

The two hegemonies, the Argentine and the Columbian, unite to set the

seal upon the emancipation of South America. San Martin and Bolívar

cross the continent from the Atlantic to the Pacific by different

routes, giving liberty to enslaved peoples, founding new nations, and

meeting as together they enclose the colonial system in its last

entrenchments, they bring the two opposing systems face to face, the

shock resulting in the triumph of the superior principle.

Thus considered, the history of the emancipation of South America

presents a homogeneous character, with unity of action and with one

dominant idea, which in the midst of accidental deviations reveals the

existence of a law giving one accordant significance to facts

accomplished.

The study of the theatre of the war of independence shows that the scene

passes in two distinct revolutionary areas--one at the south,

comprehending the United Provinces of the River Plate, Chile, and Upper

Peru; the other, at the north, comprehending Venezuela, New Granada, and

Quito. The strife and the triumph proceed simultaneously in each area

until the two revolutions, like to two masses obeying a reciprocal

attraction, converge towards the centre. This plan, drawn up and carried

out by the two great Liberators, emancipates South America by the

combined military action of the revolted colonies, which action has at

once the ideal unity of a poem and the precision of a machine.

The unity of this action is clearly displayed in the general lines of

the life of San Martin, and gives to his historic figure an importance

far transcending both his deeds and his designs. He was born in an

obscure American town, which disappeared as he commenced to figure upon

the scene; thus America in its entirety became his country. He grew up

as a soldier in the Old World, fighting by sea and on land in company

with the first soldiers of the age, and so prepared himself for his

warlike mission, unwitting of his destiny. In the New World he commenced

his career by establishing tactics and discipline as his base of

operations, and from their combination produced his machine of war. He

consolidated the independence of the United Provinces of the River Plate

as the point from which he might start for the conquest of South

America. In command of the army of the North, his name is associated

with the revolution of Upper Peru; as he passed the Andes in prosecution

of his own plan, he became identified with the revolution of Chile, and

after consolidating the independence of this country he initiated the

first international alliance in America. He secured the command of the

Pacific, without which the independence of America was at that time

impossible, and gave liberty to Lower Peru. He then carried the

revolutionary standard of the allies to the foot of Pichincha, where he

met the liberator of Columbia. Under the equator, which divides the two

theatres of the war, he clasped hands with Bolívar. Thus ended his grand

campaign; at the apogee of his power he disappeared from the scene,

knowing that his mission was fulfilled, that his strength was exhausted,

and condemned himself to exile, faithful to the ruling maxim of his

life, _Serás lo que debes ser; y sinó, no serás nada_.[1]

From exile he looked upon the results of his life-work: the definitive

political organization of South America in accordance with geographical

divisions, the foundation of a new constellation of independent States

in obedience to natural laws as by him instinctively foreseen. He saw

without envy that Bolívar, with whom he shared the glory of the

redemption of a new world, wore the crown of the final triumph, though

he knew that both as a politician and as a soldier he was his superior.

Then the wild dream of Bolívar that he could found an empire of

dependent republics under the auspices of Columbia faded away, and gave

place to the Argentine plan of independent republics heralded by San

Martin.

SYNOPSIS OF THE SOUTH AMERICAN REVOLUTION.

It has been said that posterity will look upon the emancipation of South

America as the most important political phenomenon of the nineteenth

century, both in itself and from the probable extent of its future

consequences. The immediate result was to bring into existence a new

group of independent nations, founded on democratic principles, in open

opposition to the right of conquest and to the dogmas of monarchy and

absolutism which yet prevailed in the Old World. These new nations were

organized on the principle of equality, and were emancipated from

privilege, and thus offered an entirely fresh field for experiment in

the development of the physical and moral faculties of man. This

movement thus constitutes one of the most drastic changes ever effected

in the condition of the human race.

The first throes of this revolution were felt at the two extremities and

in the centre of South America in the year 1809. In 1810 all the Spanish

American colonies rose up in rebellion as by one innate impulse, and

proclaimed the principle of self-government. Six years later all, save

one, of these insurrections were quelled.

The United Provinces of the River Plate alone maintained their position,

and after declaring their own independence they gave to the conquered

colonies the signal for the great and final struggle by making common

cause with them.

In 1817 the Argentine revolution drew up a plan for the emancipation of

the continent, took the offensive, crossed the Andes, and liberated

Chile; in union with Chile obtained command of the Pacific, liberated

Peru and carried her arms to the equator in aid of the revolution of

Columbia. This vigorous impulse was felt in the extreme north of this

southern continent, which in its turn defeated and expelled the

champions of the old system, went through a similar evolution, and

crossed the Andes to the point where the two forces united. The

Highlands of Peru became the scene of the final struggle. Then the

Spanish American colonies were free by their own strength, and from the

chaos sprang up a new world.

During the progress of these events, the United States of the North, the

pioneers of the Republican era, recognised the independence of the new

republics (1822), as “an expression of the simple truth,” and declared--

“The peoples of South America have a right to break the chains which

bind them to their mother country, to assume the rank of nations among

the sovereign nations of the world, and to establish institutions in

accordance with natural laws dictated by God himself.”

As a consequence of this recognition the United States, in the year

1823, promulgated the famous Monroe Doctrine which, in opposition to the

Bull of Alexander VI., established a new principle of international law

under the formula--“America for the Americans.”

Free England, who at first looked favourably upon the revolution, began,

in 1818, to lean towards Spain and the Holy Alliance, advocating an

arrangement on the basis of the “commercial freedom” of the colonies.

The diplomatists of Washington interfered in favour of their complete

emancipation, and Lafayette, in support of this idea, declared to the

Government of France:--

“Any opposition which may be made to the independence of the New World

may cause suffering but will not imperil the idea.”

Thus, much before the final triumph, the emancipation of the new

continent was accepted as an accomplished fact, and the attitude of the

United States supported by England turned the scales of diplomacy in its

favour in 1823. When at the Congress of Verona the party of reaction

proposed a contrary policy, Canning, Prime Minister of Great Britain,

wrote to Grenville those memorable words which re-echoed through two

hemispheres:--

“The battle has been fierce, but it is won. The nail is clenched;

Spanish America is free. _Novus sæclorum nascitur ordo!_”

The battle of Ayacucho was the response to these words, and Canning

could then exclaim:--

“I have called a new world into existence to redress the balance of the

old.”

THE ACTION OF AMERICA UPON EUROPE.

The land discovered by Christopher Columbus, which completed the

physical world, was destined to re-establish its general equilibrium at

the moment the base thereof was shaken.

Before the end of the fifteenth century Europe had lost its moral and

political equilibrium. After the invasion of the barbarians, which

imbued it with a new principle of life without destroying the germ of

decay left by the fall of the Roman Empire, its civilization was again

on the point of collapse. Not one homogeneous nation there existed, her

productive energy was exhausted, liberty was but a latent hope,

privilege was the dominant law, politics were founded on the principles

of Macchiavelli, all healthy evolution in the path of progress was

impossible. A fresh invasion from the East advanced under the standard

of the Crescent, and the despotism of Mussulman fanaticism was the last

hope of the people. Europe, shut in between the Danube and the Pillars

of Hercules, seemed lost; the discovery of a new world alone could save

her.

This discovery restored harmony to the discordant elements, gave new

life to Christianity, and saved the liberties of mankind. The

Reformation, which came immediately afterwards, engrafted upon the

consciences of men the germ of the democratic principles of the Bible,

which, transplanted to a new world, later on regenerated the effete

civilization brought from Europe, and spread it as a vital principle of

politics all the world over.

The popular belief that the fountain of eternal youth was to be found on

the new continent discovered by Columbus, was no vain imagination. The

decrepit civilization of the Old World drew fresh youth and strength

from the virgin soil of America, the genius of progress therein latent

developed rapidly in the genial air. The opening of this new and vast

field to human activity, was truly a renovation of social order in

accordance with natural law, and resulted in the organization of a

democracy based upon labour. To this end it was only necessary that the

European, leaving his old traditions behind him, should, on a vacant

continent, work out his own destiny under the guidance of healthy

instinct.

THE COLONIZATION OF SPANISH AMERICA.

In the repartition of the new continent the worst lot fell to the

southern half. Spain and Portugal carried their feudal absolutism to

their colonies, but they could not plant there their systems of

privilege, of aristocracy, or of social inequality. The good and the bad

seed alike were modified by cultivation in a new soil, the natural

product being democracy. The mode of colonization contributed to this

result. The most trustworthy annals of the Indies recognise the fact

that the conquest was achieved at the expense of the conquerors, without

any drafts on the royal treasury. Hence arose that spirit of

self-reliance which they bequeathed to their descendants. A rebel world

grew up under the auspices of absolutism. The colonial constitution,

which inculcated a personal despotism and excluded the idea of a common

country, contributed fatally to this result. Spanish America was looked

upon as the personal property of the Spanish monarch, in virtue of the

Bull of Alexander VI. Thus the colony did not form a part of the nation,

and was united to her only by allegiance to a common sovereign. When the

monarch disappeared, his power lapsed to his vassals; the logical and

legal result being the separation of the colonies from the mother

country.

The government of the colonies was entrusted to the Council of the

Indies, represented politically by a Viceroy, and in law by the

Audiencia, the bounds of whose authority were ill-defined. In municipal

affairs, the Cabildos, derived from the free communities of the mother

country, were nominally the representatives of the people. In them lay

the germs of democracy, as they possessed the right to call public

meetings for the settlement of their own affairs by vote, which right,

for long in abeyance, became an active power when supported by popular

force.

The great extent of the country, the want of moral cohesion, the

admixture of races, the general corruption of manners, the absence of an

ideal, the lack of political and industrial activity, and the profound

ignorance of the masses, all contributed to produce a state of

semi-barbarism by the side of a weakly civilization, and vitiated the

entire social organism. From this embryo was to spring a new republican

world, the product of the germs latent within it.

THE COLONIZATION OF NORTH AMERICA.

North America, more fortunate, was colonized by a nation which had

practical notions of liberty, and by a race better prepared for

self-government. The process commenced a century later. The colonists

easily adapted themselves to a climate similar to that of the mother

country, and founded there a new home to which they were bound by free

institutions. Originally the English colonies were looked upon as Crown

provinces, and were ruled by privileged companies, and by a Council

similar to that of the Indies, the monarch reserving to himself, as in

Spain, the supreme legislative authority and the right of appointment,

without giving any legislative rights. The colonists of Virginia, by

their own energy, soon acquired some political rights, which were

secured to them by royal charters. This example was followed by the

colonists of Maryland. Colonial assemblies absorbed the privileges of

the companies, and the royal charters formed later on the basis of

republican institutions.

After the planters of Virginia and Maryland came the PILGRIM FATHERS of

New England, who, flying from persecution in Europe, sought liberty of

conscience in the New World. Authors of the great revolution, they were

deeply imbued with the republican spirit, and with the democratic spirit

of Switzerland and of the Netherlands, in which latter country they had

seen their ideal of the ruler of a free people in the austere person of

William of Orange, the antetype of Washington. In accordance with these

ideas, they established at once a form of popular government hitherto

unknown, based upon just laws. Finally came the Quakers, who proclaimed

freedom of the intellect as an innate and inalienable right, and drew up

their constitution on the basis of democratic equality, absolute and

universal; in this anticipating the most advanced of the modern era.

Under William Penn they established the representative colony of

Pennsylvania, the nucleus and the type of the great republic of the

United States.

Such was the genesis of democratic liberty, destined to become

universal.

COLONIAL POLICY IN BOTH AMERICAS.

The commercial monopoly which Spain adopted as a system on the discovery

of America, had an influence quite as evil upon herself as upon her

colonies. The intention was that Spain should draw to herself the wealth

of the New World, by keeping in her own hands the exchange of European

manufactures for the products of America. Every industry which might

compete with those of the Peninsula was prohibited in America. At first

Seville, and afterwards Cadiz, was declared to be the only port from

which ships laden with merchandise could sail, or at which they could

land cargoes of colonial produce. All direct trade between the colonies

themselves was forbidden. The restrictive system was completed by

collecting all the merchant vessels into annual or biennial convoys

sailing in charge of ships of war to or from Portobello and Panama.

Merchandise so introduced, was carried across the isthmus and

distributed by way of the Pacific and by land to Potosi, where the

Southern and Atlantic Provinces could supply themselves at prices five

or six hundred per cent. over the original cost. Such a system could

only spring from a mind enfeebled by the possession of absolute power,

and could only be tolerated by a race of slaves.

Before one century had elapsed, the population of Spain was reduced by

one-half, her manufacturing industries were ruined, her mercantile

marine no longer existed, her trade was in the hands of foreign

smugglers, and the gold and silver of the New World went everywhere

except to Spain.[2] When Spain, taught by experience, sought to remedy

the evil, it was already too late, her colonies on the southern

continent were lost to her. Neither force nor love, nor a common

interest, bound the disinherited children to their parent; the

separation was complete, and the independence of the colonies a question

of time and of opportunity.

The colonial system of Spain was not an invention, it was an ancient

tradition, it was the economic theory of the epoch reduced to practice.

England followed the same system, committing even greater errors in the

establishment of privileged companies, such as the East India Company,

giving territories to them on a feudal basis, the monarch reserving

absolute authority over commercial relations.

In practice these errors furnished their own remedies. Tyrannical laws

fell into disuse from the resistance of colonies armed with municipal

rights. Thus the results sought by England were achieved without great

violence and with advantage both to the mother country and to her

colonies. The navigation laws of 1650--1666 gave supremacy to the

mercantile marine of England, and by shutting out foreign competition

from her markets, monopolised the trade with the colonies. This monopoly

in skilful hands, colonized North America and corrected to some extent

the errors of the system. In 1652, under Cromwell, freedom of commerce

was established between England and her colonies, the right being given

to the colonists to tax themselves by the votes of their representatives

and to regulate their own Customs duties. This was almost independence.

Even when their charters were mutilated or abrogated by the Stuarts,

this doctrine was respected by common consent. When England disregarded

it came the revolution.

THE EMANCIPATION OF NORTH AMERICA.

A special question of constitutional law concerning Customs duties, was

the immediate cause of the revolution in North America. The revolution

of South America arose from a question of fundamental principles.

The Stamp Tax imposed by England on her colonies was repealed on the

ground that it was an _internal_ tax, but Parliament sanctioned the

imposition of Customs duties on the ground that they were an _external_

tax, the produce of the colonies being subject to the will of the king.

The colonists protested and took a further step by declaring that the

_Mutiny Act_ had nothing to do with them, as it was sanctioned by a

Parliament in which they were not represented. They called out their

municipal militia, and so in 1774 commenced the great struggle for the

emancipation of America. During ten years their resistance had been kept

within the limits of the laws, but from this moment they took their

stand on the wide basis of natural and ideal right, independent of law

and of tradition.

The Declaration of Independence on the 4th July, 1776, was the

proclamation of an innate universal human right, of a new theory of

government independent of precedent, inspired by natural law, by

philosophy, and by political science. This declaration became, as has

been said,

“The profession of faith of all the liberals of the world.”

The echo of these theories was heard in France, and by her was

transmitted to the Latin nations of both hemispheres. The people

embraced them with enthusiasm. Up to that time two schools of politics

had divided the empire of free thought. The historical school, led by

Montesquieu, looked upon the constitution of England as the finished

work of experience and of human logic. The philosophical school, led by

Rousseau, denied the value of experience and thought to establish

liberty and the sovereignty of the people by seeking “the best form of

association for the defence and protection of each associate against the

force of all, so that each one should obey only himself and remain free

as before.” This second doctrine formulated in the constitution of the

United States, became a new principle in political science, and as such

met with general acceptance throughout the colonies of South America.

The most important feature of the revolution of North America is not the

achievement of her national independence, but her emancipation,

political, intellectual, and moral, in the name of human rights and in

constitutional form. From this moment, English constitutionalism ceased

to be a model, and the English constitution to be an ideal, even among

the English themselves, who have had to recognise their descendants and

political pupils as their masters.

The spirit of free England, anticipating the verdict of posterity,

justified insurrection in America. Statesmen and thinkers such as

Chatham and Burke, sympathised in the movement, declaring, “There is no

monopoly of principle,” but its effect upon France was still more

marked, being the outcome of the reasonings of her philosophers.

Thus it was that America reacted for the second time upon Europe with

most beneficial effect. On the third occasion the part of teacher is

played by South America.

THE AFFILIATION OF THE REVOLUTION OF SOUTH AMERICA.

Hardly was Peru conquered by the Spanish race, than it became the

theatre of civil war. The conquerors, headed by Gonzalo Pizarro,

rebelled against their king in the name of their rights as conquerors,

cut off the head of the king’s representative and burned the Royal

Standard. Hardly had one generation time to grow up in America, ere a

son of Hernan Cortez, in whose veins flowed the blood of the celebrated

Indian Doña Marina, conspired to give independence to Mexico in the name

of the same territorial rights invoked by Pizarro. The far off colony

of Paraguay was from the first a turbulent municipal republic. The

colonists deposed their royally appointed governors with shouts of

“Death to Tyrants,” elected rulers of their own, and did as they liked

for more than twenty-five years (1535-60). These and many other similar

facts, prove that the colonization of South America was imbued from the

commencement with the principle of individuality and with the instinct

of independence, which naturally resulted in emancipation and democracy.

These insurrections were outbursts of Castillian spirit, but early in

the eighteenth century, Creoles begin to call themselves with pride

Americans, and for the first time is heard in Potosi the cry of

_Liberty_. In 1711 the half-breeds proclaimed a mulatto King of

Venezuela. In 1733 the Creoles rose in arms and compelled the abrogation

of the commercial monopoly of the “Compania Guipuzcoana de Caracas.” In

1730 two thousand half-breeds at Cochabamba (Upper Peru), made armed

protest against the poll-tax, and acquired the right to elect Creoles as

officers of justice to the exclusion of Spaniards. In 1765 the Creoles

of Quito rose in armed insurrection against the imposition of direct

taxes. None of these outbreaks had as yet any definite political

character. The embryonic republic of Paraguay gave the first example of

a revolutionary movement based upon the sovereignty of the people.

José Antequera, by birth an American but educated in Spain, appeared on

the scene during a dispute between the governor of Paraguay and the

Cabildo of Asuncion. The people named him governor by acclamation. He

placed himself at their head, in opposition to the theocratic rule of

the Jesuits, who were ruining the country. He fought pitched battles

against the royal troops and was blessed as a saviour, but died on the

scaffold as a traitor to his king.

After his death, his pupil Fernando Mompox organized the popular party

under the name of the _Comuneros_, deposed another governor and

established a governing Junta, but was also overcome.

In 1781 the _Comuneros_ broke out in insurrection in New Granada, but

the movement was suppressed.

These were not events of great historical importance, but they show that

throughout the period of Spanish domination, the rule of the mother

country was irksome to the Spaniards themselves, and was hateful to all

Americans.

THE MORAL REVOLUTION OF SOUTH AMERICA.

There can be no revolution until the ideas of men become the conscience

of the mass, and until the passions of men become a public force,

because “it is man and not events which constitute the world.” The

revolution was accomplished in the man of South America before the end

of the eighteenth century; after that all his actions have one object

and one meaning. Emancipation was no longer an instinct, it became an

active passion.

Spain through jealousy of England joined France in aiding the rebels of

the North, and her recognition of the independence of the new republic

was virtually the abdication of her own authority over the South.

Aranda, one of the first statesmen of his time, advised his sovereign in

1783 to forestall the inevitable future by making one _infante_ King of

Mexico, one King of Peru, and one King of the Mainland, taking to

himself the rank of Emperor. The King of Spain shut his ears to these

counsels.

The revolution of 1789 proved that the ideas embodied in the Declaration

of Independence were of universal application. The monarchs of Europe

took the alarm and formed reactionary leagues. To South America these

ideas were conveyed by educated Creoles, who travelling in Europe

learned them from French writers. “The Rights of Man” was translated,

printed in secret, and circulated through New Granada by Antonio

Nariño. Charged with this as a crime, no proof could be brought against

him as no copy of the book could be found, tortures failing to extract

information from suspects. He was banished to Africa, his property

confiscated, and his original copy of the work was burnt by the public

executioner. From the men of culture the new ideas filtered to the

masses, transforming their minds by the creation of an ideal, which each

one interpreted in accordance with his own talents, interests, or

prejudices.

THE PRECURSOR OF THE EMANCIPATION OF SOUTH AMERICA.

During some years previously an ardent apostle of human liberty had

wandered about the world. He was a dreamer with confused ideas and

undisciplined attainments, a generous minded warrior, above all, a man

of strong will. A soldier of Washington, a comrade of Lafayette, a

general under Dumouriez,[3] a companion of Madame Roland in her prison,

a confidant of Pitt in his schemes of insurrection in the colonies of

Spanish America, distinguished by Catharine II. of Russia, whose favours

he put aside in deference to his austere mission, looked upon by

Napoleon as a lunatic with a spark of the sacred fire, FRANCISCO

MIRANDA, a native of Caracas, was the first to foresee the great

destinies of republican America, and the first to raise the banner of

freedom on the southern continent.

He it was who organised the revolutionary efforts of South Americans in

Europe; establishing an understanding with the Creoles of the colonies.

It was he who towards the close of the eighteenth century founded in

London the political society, the “Gran Reunion Americana,” to which

they were all affiliated. In this society were initiated in the

mysteries of future liberty, O’Higgins of Chile, Nariño of New Granada,

Montufar and Rocafuerte of Quito, Caro of Cuba, who represented the

patriots of Peru, Alvear, an Argentine, and others who later on became

illustrious. Here the two great liberators, BOLÍVAR and SAN MARTIN, took

an oath to work out the triumph of the cause of the emancipation of

South America.

This society was the type of the secret societies which, transplanted to

the theatre of action, impressed its seal upon the characters of those

who directed the revolution of South America. They inoculated it with

the true American idea, which, heedless of frontiers and disregarding

all obstacles, looked upon the enslaved colonies as one, with one

aspiration, with one love, and with one hatred of their common master.

This gave cohesion to the revolution in America, and ensured triumph by

the union of all forces to one common end. Here was the point of contact

of all Creoles, wherever they might work for independence and for

liberty. Here is the explanation of the identity of the original

movements in spite of the isolation of each colony.

Miranda sought to interest the whole world in the cause of independence;

chiefly he sought the help of England. Three times (1790--1801) he

obtained a promise of moral and material support from Pitt, with the

co-operation of the United States. European complications and the

hesitation of the cabinet at Washington, prevented the fulfilment of

these promises. In 1791 he published a letter to the Americans, in which

he attacked the colonial system of Spain, declaring that nature had

separated America from Spain by the interposition of the ocean, thus

emancipating her sons from the mother country, and that they--

“Were free by natural right received from the Creator; that the moment

had arrived for opening up a new era of prosperity; and with the aid of

Providence, to raise up in America a grand family of brothers united by

a common interest.”

Failing in his attempt to secure the help of England and the United

States, Miranda ventured upon the enterprise by himself. In the year

1806 he made two attempts to kindle the fire of revolution in his native

country. He landed on the mainland at Ocumare with two hundred men, and

at Vela de Coro with five hundred. None responded to his call, but the

cry was heard, and its echo resounded through two worlds.

England, on the death of Pitt, abandoning his projects for the

emancipation of the colonies of Spanish America, attempted to conquer

them for herself, and was twice defeated at Buenos Ayres in 1806 and

1807. Miranda was pleased at this defeat, and in 1808 wrote to

congratulate the Cabildo of Buenos Ayres. At the same time he wrote to

the Cabildo of Caracas, giving notice of the invasion of Spain by

Napoleon, advising them to take charge of the government and to send

deputies to London to arrange the future course of the New World. At the

same time he published in London a pamphlet written in English by an

Englishman, in which from the defeat of the English was drawn a lesson,

based upon the opinion of General Auchmuty, that the Creoles would only

make alliance with England on condition of their own independence.

Miranda translated this pamphlet into Spanish, and added a sketch of a

constitution for the new States proposed, the dominant idea of which was

a federal republic on a basis of independent Cabildos.

As the victory of Buenos Ayres made a great noise in the world, and more

especially in the hearts of Americans, this propaganda fell in with the

new sentiment of nationality, disclosed in the words of Don Cornelio

Saavedra in his address to the Patricios[4] of Buenos Ayres in 1807:

“Those born in the Indies, whose spirits are undaunted, are in no way

inferior to the Spaniards of Europe, and in valour give place to none.”

THE RACES OF SOUTH AMERICA.--THE CREOLE.

Five races, which for historic purposes may be looked upon as three

only, peopled the Southern Continent at the outbreak of the War of

Independence: the European Spaniards, the Spanish-American Creoles, and

the half-breeds; also the indigenous Indians, and the negroes from

Africa. The Spaniards formed a privileged class, and by reason of their

origin enjoyed both political and social pre-eminence. The Indians and

the negroes formed the servile class. The half-breeds, derived from a

mixture of three races, formed an intermediate class, and in some places

were in a large majority. The Creoles, direct descendants of Spaniards,

of pure blood, but modified in character by contact with the

half-breeds, were the true sons of the soil, and constituted the basis

of society. Generally the most numerous, they were always the civilising

force of the colony. They were the most energetic, the most intelligent

and imaginative; and with all their inherited vices and their want of

preparation for freedom, were the only ones animated by an innate

sentiment of patriotism.

Those born in South America thus formed a race apart, an oppressed race,

who saw in their ancestors and in their contemporaries not fathers and

brothers, but masters. The colonial system placed, to a certain extent,

all natives of the soil upon the same level, and drew a broad line of

distinction between the Spanish-American colonists and their mother

country. Spain, by reason of distance, yielded to her colonists greater

freedom and more municipal rights than she gave to her own sons in their

own land, but her absolute government could not bind her colonies to her

by the tie of nationality. Men of Spanish birth looked upon the

colonies as feudal territory, over which they, as beings of a superior

race, were the natural lords, and thought that if only a shoemaker

remained in Castile, this shoemaker had the right to govern all America.

The natural aspiration of slaves is for freedom, and that of oppressed

races who know their own strength is to assume their place in the human

family. In this double aspiration lay the germ of revolution in America.

In 1780 the indigenous race under Tupac-Amarú, a descendant of the

Incas, rose _en masse_ in Peru against their oppressors, but were

naturally defeated. They possessed no great social force, and did not

represent the cause of civilized America. The day of the Creoles had not

yet come, but they saw nothing to admire, to love, or to respect in

Spain. An absolute King, generally an imbecile, was the sole point of

contact between them. Their mother country was to them neither a country

nor a mother. The instinct of independence became a passion, even more

vehement in those who resided in Spain than in those who had never left

their own hearths. Thus it was that the leaders who did most for the

revolution came from Spain.

In the struggle each race took its own special part. The Creoles formed

the vanguard and directed the movements. The indigenous races formed the

first line in Mexico, but elsewhere they were only useful as

auxiliaries. In South America the half-breeds formed the rank and file

of the armies of the revolution. The Argentine _gaucho_, with the

fatalism of the Arab and the strength of the Cossack, gave the type to

the cavalry, renowned for the impetuosity of their charge from La Plata

to Chimborazo. The _llaneros_[5] of Venezuela, half-breeds for the most

part, formed the famous squadrons of Columbia, whose feats were

celebrated from the Orinoco to Potosi. The _rotos_[6] of Chile, mostly

of Indian blood, formed with Argentines in solid battalions, who

measured their strength with Spanish regiments, victors over the

soldiers of Napoleon in the Peninsula. The manumitted negroes gave their

contingent to the American infantry, showing the warlike qualities of

their race. In Upper Peru the indigenous races kept alive for ten years

the flames of insurrection when the patriot armies were defeated. The

_cholos_ of the Highlands of Peru espoused the cause of the king, and

were highly esteemed as infantry by the Spanish generals, more

especially on account of the extraordinary rapidity of their marches.

The Creole of South America is a sturdy off-shoot of that civilizing

Indo-European race to which is reserved the government of the world. It

is his mission to complete the democratization of the American continent

and to found a new order of things destined to live and progress. He has

impressed the peculiarities of his character upon the new nationalities.

When the revolution broke out in 1810, it was said that South America

would become English or French; when it triumphed, that the continent

would sink back into barbarism. By the will and the work of the Creole,

it became American, republican, and civilized.

THE FIRST THROES OF REVOLUTION.

The initial outbreaks of the year 1809, were in some parts of a more

radical character than were those of the following year, when the first

political formula of the rebellion was merely a demand for relative and

provisional independence, for a compromise between democracy and

monarchy upon the basis of autonomy.

The doctrine that on the disappearance of the monarch his sovereignty

reverted to his people, was for the first time boldly proclaimed in

Mexico. From this it was deduced that they had the right to appoint

governing Juntas for their own security, and owed no allegiance to those

established in Spain at the time of the French invasion. Hence arose

disputes between the Creoles and the Spaniards, and between the

Audiencia and the Viceroy, which at the end of 1809 changed the movement

into a conspiracy for independence.

In Quito the commotion assumed more definite forms. The colonial

authorities were overturned and a governing Junta was set up, which took

to itself the attributes of sovereignty and raised troops for its own

defence. They exhorted the peoples of America by a proclamation to

follow the example, announcing that “law has resumed its authority under

the equator,” and that “the rights of man were, by the disappearance of

despotism, no longer at the mercy of arbitrary power.” The authors of

this premature revolution were overcome and put to death in prison.

In Upper Peru, the city of Chuquisaca was the first to move. In May,

1809, the Creoles, at the instigation of the Audiencia, tumultuously

deposed the constituted authorities, and set up an independent

government. In July the city of La Paz followed the example. Under the

name of the _Junta Tuitiva_, an independent government composed

exclusively of Americans was established, which raised an army, and hung

on a gallows those who denied its authority. Both these revolts were

suppressed by the combined arms of the neighbouring Viceroyalties of

Peru and La Plata. The leaders of the insurrection of La Paz died either

on the field of battle or on the gallows. One of the latter before being

thrown off cried out:--“The fire which I have lighted shall never be

quenched.” Their heads and limbs were nailed to the posts which mark out

the public roads in that country, but before they had rotted away the

fire was again burning in Upper Peru.

By the quelling of these conspiracies it was thought that the danger was

averted, but as was said by the Viceroy of Peru fifty years before, on

the first revolt of the Comuneros of Paraguay, “it was but a covering up

of the fire with ashes.”

THE GROWTH OF THE REVOLUTION.

In the year 1810 the drama of revolution unfolded itself upon a vast

continental scene, with a unity of action which from the first attracted

the attention of the world. All the Spanish American colonies with the

exception of Lower Peru, arose in rebellion simultaneously, and

proclaimed one political doctrine. Some historians have thought that

this movement was the result of an external impulse, and that the

subsequent separation was as the falling of unripe fruit. Others, better

informed, look upon this separation as a necessity: “The union of Spain

with America, possible under an absolute _régime_, was incompatible with

representative government and with the political equality of the

citizens.” The truth is that the South American revolution was inspired

by an innate sentiment of patriotism, in obedience to conservative

instinct, and by its nature tended to independence.

The divorce of the colonies from the mother country took place at a

critical moment, when their union was hurtful to them both. If America

was not prepared for self-government, and if her attempts at

self-government almost exhausted the forces already weakened by the

struggle, what would then have been her condition had she remained under

the rule of unnatural laws which condemned her to a lingering death, a

prey to vices inoculated by an evil system?

It cannot be denied that without the invasion of Spain by Napoleon in

1808, and the consequent disappearance of the dynasty of Spain, the

revolution would have been delayed; but this does not imply that America

was not ripe for emancipation, the opportunity was nothing more than the

spark setting fire to the combustibles already prepared for burning.

The Provisional Government established in Spain anticipated the

complaints of the colonists, and recognised by its acts the justice of

their cause, fomenting their resistance as much by its concessions as by

its refusals. The Regency of Cadiz called upon Americans to join the

national Cortes, thus raising them to the rank of freemen, but at the

same time gave them only one deputy, chosen by itself, for each million

of inhabitants, while to the natives of the Peninsula, for the most part

under the yoke of the foreigner, it gave one deputy for each hundred

thousand. The essential difference lay in the divergence of their

political opinions. The Regency maintained “The American dominions are

an integral part of Spain,” from which it deduced the right of Spain to

rule America in the absence of the sovereign. Americans, as we have

already seen, maintained that the crown was the only link between them.

Take away this fundamental divergence of opinion, and the reason for the

revolution disappears, the insurrection loses its legality, and the

question becomes one of national representation, having no relation

either to independence or to autonomy.

The colonial authorities were deposed without resistance by the force of

public opinion, and new ones were instituted without any rupture of

relations with the mother country, though all foresaw the logical end of

the process. In answer to this moderate policy, the Regency refused to

the colonies that freedom of trade which it had proposed to give them,

avoided the mediation of England, and, without attempting to arrive

peacefully at an understanding, stigmatised the Americans as rebels and

declared war against them, punishing as high treason in them that which

the Spaniards themselves had done in Spain. It was then (1811) that

Venezuela declared herself independent, and gave herself a republican

constitution.

South America was ill-prepared for the struggle; she had neither

soldiers nor politicians, she had to improvise all she needed. Spain in

alliance with England and supported by the first nations of the world,

was mistress of the seas, her armies triumphant in Europe, were

stronger than before the French invasion, nevertheless South America

unaided accepted the challenge, and triumphed all alone.

The meeting of the Cortes and the promulgation of the Constitution of

1812, instead of reconciling the mother country with her colonies,

fanned the flames of insurrection, and by concessions encouraged the

spirit of independence. When in 1814 the King was restored, America was

still governed in his name, and the movement having been crushed in

Venezuela the revolution was placed in a false position. The refusal of

America to surrender without conditions to absolute power, was replied

to by the proclamation of a war of reconquest, and amicable arrangement

was no longer possible.

In 1820 despotism triumphed in Europe under the banners of absolute

kings allied against the liberties of the people, but in South America

the cause of independence, fostered by the example of the United States,

was successful. From this epoch the reaction of American thought is felt

in the Parliament of England, and influences even Spain herself, where

the armies collected to stamp out revolution in America, turn against

the absolute king and re-establish a constitutional _régime_. This is a

critical moment: upon the triumph or the defeat of revolution in South

America depend the destinies of two worlds.

Five years later on, victory crowned her efforts, America is republican,

independent, and free. From this moment the current of history, which

has for three centuries carried despotism from the East to the West, now

turns back; the action of the principles of American regeneration flows

from West to East and spreads over Europe until stopped by the barrier

of Islamism. Greece cries out for emancipation, and Europe instead of

joining to crush her aspirations, runs to help her. Portugal becomes

free by the example and influence of her American colonies, who send

back to her her absolute kings, transformed into constitutional rulers.

In France the revolution of 1789 revives in a compromise between

monarchy and a republic, its champions being a comrade of Washington and

an emigrant prince who had studied American democracy at close quarters.

Take away the South American revolution of the year ’10, suppose it to

be suppressed in 1820, or eliminate the final triumph of 1825, and the

republic of the United States remains the sole representative of

liberty; and the world, even with the help of free England, lies

grovelling under the sway of absolutism.

ATTEMPTS AT MONARCHY IN SOUTH AMERICA.

Had the idea of Aranda been adopted in 1783, it is probable that a

bastard monarchy would have been established in America, upon which time

would have impressed the seal of democracy. Had the King of Spain

removed his throne to America in 1808, as did he of Portugal, it is

possible that the course of the revolution might have been changed under

dynastic auspices, delaying the advent of the republic and perchance

accelerating constitutional stability. These two opportunities being

lost, the revolution could only develop in accordance with its own

nature and become essentially a republican movement.

The Pilgrim Fathers of New England and the Quakers of Pennsylvania

carried with them the seed of republicanism. The Cavaliers who colonized

Virginia became republicans by founding a new country of a distinct

type, which produced Washington. The Spanish colonists of South America

brought with them no such ideas but only germs of individualism, from

which time developed desires for independence and for equality. The

indigenous races knew nothing of any form of government except monarchy.

The Creoles were born republicans. The idea of establishing a monarchy

never sprang from a Creole brain, and when proposed was looked upon by

them only as a compromise or as an artificial expedient when it was not

folly. In 1808 the English constitution was the ideal of thinkers

trained in the school of Montesquieu. In 1810 the _social contract_ of

Rousseau was their gospel, and the revolution of that year assumed

spontaneously a popular form, producing municipal republics, whereby the

course of opinion became exclusively democratic.

When early reverses damped the republican hopes of Argentine leaders,

they looked to the establishment of a monarchy under the protection of

the Great Powers as a means of securing independence and constitutional

freedom. In 1814 it was proposed to crown an Infante of Spain King of La

Plata. In 1816 that same Congress which declared the independence of the

Argentine Provinces, embraced the idea of crowning a descendant of the

Incas at Cuzco, and uniting Peru and the River Plate under his rule, a

proposition quenched in ridicule. The same Congress, in 1819, after

swearing to and promulgating a republican constitution, sought in Europe

for a king, lowering their character in the eyes of the world, and

bringing accusations of treachery upon themselves from their own

countrymen.

This reaction took place precisely at the time when the perseverance of

the republicans had gained for them universal sympathy, when the United

States threw her shield over the infant peoples to protect them from the

attacks of the Holy Alliance, and when England, after declaring that she

would not recognise “the revolutionary governments of America,” became

convinced of her mistake. The agents of this policy were men such as

Rivadavia, who stands in America second alone to Washington as the

representative statesman of a free people; such as Belgrano, the type of

republican virtue; and such as San Martin, who, a republican at heart,

had no faith in democracy, yet founded republics which by natural law

became democracies. When San Martin ignored this law, his career as a

liberator came to an end. So also, later on, fell Bolívar in the

attempt to convert democracy into monocracy. The only American liberator

who in his folly crowned himself emperor--Iturbide in Mexico--died on

the scaffold, a presage of the sad end of another emperor, whose corpse

was sent back to Europe as a protest against the imposition of monarchy.

The Empire of Brazil is apparently a proof of the possibility of

establishing monarchy in America, but the contrary is the fact. Brazil

is a democratic empire, founded upon the principle of the sovereignty of

the people, without any privileged class or hereditary nobility, and has

nothing monarchical about it except the name.

RETROSPECTION.

When the war was over and the continent at peace, Bolívar exclaimed, “I

blush to say it, independence is the only good we have achieved at the

cost of all else.” Even at this price independence was solid gain, for

it was life. The continuance of the colonial system was death by

decomposition. Independence was, moreover, the establishment of the

democratic republic, a system under which all losses may be retrieved.

South America has no reason to complain of the task allotted to her in

working out the destiny of humanity.

In the first decade of this century the republic of the United States

was a sun without satellites. The apparition of a group of new nations

from the colonial nebula of the South, formed, for the first time in the

political world, a planetary system of republics governed by natural

laws. An entire continent, almost one half the globe, extending from

pole to pole and washed by the two greatest of the oceans, became

republican.

At that time there were but two republics in the world--in Europe,

Switzerland; in America, the United States. The influence of the latter

was not yet felt, but the new system of republics soon became a power of

the first rank.

The republics of South America were strong enough to conquer their

independence, but they lacked the elements of self-government. They had

passed at one bound from slavery to freedom, and it took them more than

one generation to eradicate evils produced by three centuries of

misgovernment. In the war they had expended not only their blood, their

treasure, and their vital energy, but also their intellectual strength.

Wealth came to them with independence, but the want of the elements of

self-government made them an easy prey to anarchy and despotism, from

which the conservative instinct at length saved them. Still they suffer

the evils of inexperience, but nothing is lost while republican

institutions, the great work of the revolution, are preserved.

No people so ill-prepared for the change could have done better. Even

the United States passed through a critical period of transition, which

imperilled their existence as an organised nation. The republics of

South America have suffered greatly from misgovernment, but the

instincts of the people have ever been superior to the incapacity of

their rulers. Had they continued subject to Spain, they would have died

of inanition; had the English invasion been successful, they might now

be colonies of England, such as Australia and Canada, and might possibly

be richer in material wealth than they are, but they would not be

independent nations, charged with the mission of creating new elements

of progress; they would but feebly reflect a far-off light. South

America would but exist as an appendage of Europe, and Europe would be

subject to the Holy Alliance of absolute kings.

If South America has not realised all the hopes awakened by the

revolution, still it cannot be said that she has faltered in her course.

She has resolved for herself the problem of life, educated herself in

the hard school of experience, and by sorrow has purged away her vices.

Giving the lie to sinister presage, which condemned her to absorption by

inferior races, the energetic Creole has assimilated them, giving them

freedom and dignity, or, when necessary, has suppressed them. With help

from the most superior races of the world, acclimatized upon her

hospitable shores, the reins of government have been secured to him. Her

regenerated population doubles itself in twenty or thirty years; before

the end of the next century South America will number four hundred

millions of freemen, North America five hundred millions, and all

America will be Republican and Democratic.

To these great results, following the example of Washington and equal to

Bolívar, will have contributed, with such talents as he possessed, the

founder of three republics, the emancipator of one-half of South

America, whose history will now be told.

The Emancipation of South America · 第 1 / 50 章