In a few seconds the _Kent’s_ anchors held, and the ship was brought

up; but she had got into a bad position. The forward-half of the ship

lay partially opposite the south-east bastion, with the after-half

overlapping the southern face of the fort in such a way that some of

the guns of the further bastion on that side, the south-west bastion,

could play upon the quarters and stern. Most of the guns mounted on the

ravelin and along the curtain of the river front could at the same time

train on her bows with a raking fire, assisted by some of the guns on

the north-east or flagstaff bastion, facing the _Tyger_, some of which

could be brought to bear. More serious still was this. The _Salisbury_

had been pushed entirely out of the fight: had been placed practically

out of action for the day. The channel was not wide enough to let the

_Salisbury_ tow ahead and pass the flagship, and the _Salisbury_ had to

anchor at a spot whence only one or two of her guns could engage. Thus it

came about that the whole brunt of fighting Fort d’Orleans fell on two

ships, the _Tyger_ and the _Kent_, by themselves.

Not a shot, according to Dr. Ives, had so far been fired in reply to the

enemy’s “tremendous cannonade.” The _Tyger_ was waiting for the _Kent_ to

hoist the red flag. It went up as soon as the _Kent’s_ anchors held. “As

soon as the ships came properly to an anchor, they returned it with such

fury as astonished their adversaries.” “Our ships lay so near the fort,”

says the doctor also, that “the musket balls fired from their tops, by

striking against the chunam walls of the Governor’s palace, which was in

the very centre of the fort, were beaten as flat as a half-crown.”

Clive’s men were at work meanwhile on the land side. They had begun

pushing the enemy hard on the previous afternoon, and had opened a

brisk attack on the outworks before daylight that morning, under the

pressure of which the French outposts fell back, until they had abandoned

practically all their landward positions beyond the walls of Fort

d’Orleans. Clive’s soldiers after that occupied some bungalows that

stood not far from the walls, from under cover of which they plied the

enemy on the ramparts with a continuous fusillade of musketry, and with

six light guns they had pushed forward. The soldiers, however, could make

little further progress for the present.

“For three hours nothing was heard but an incessant roll of artillery and

musketry, the crashing of timbers and masonry, the shouts and cheers of

the combatants, and the shrieks and groans of the wounded.”

Describing the scene on board his own ship during the first two hours,

Dr. Ives says: “The fire was kept up with extraordinary spirit. The flank

guns of the south-west bastion galled the _Kent_ very much, and the

Admiral’s aides-de-camp being all wounded, Mr. Watson went down himself

to Lieutenant William Brereton, who commanded the lower-deck battery, and

ordered him particularly to direct his fire against those guns, and they

were accordingly soon afterwards silenced.”

Then he relates this incident, which occurred on board just afterwards.

“At eight in the morning,” says the doctor, “several of the enemy’s shot

struck the _Kent_ at the same time; one entered near the foremast, and

set fire to two or three 32-pound cartridges of gunpowder as the boys

held them in their hands ready to charge the guns. By the explosion the

wad-nets and other loose things took fire between decks, and the whole

ship was so filled with smoke that the men in their confusion cried out

she was on fire in the gunner’s store-room, imagining from the shock

they had felt from the balls that a shell had actually fallen into her.

This notion struck a panic into the greatest part of the crew, and

seventy or eighty jumped out of the portholes into the boats that were

alongside the ship. The French presently saw this confusion on board the

_Kent_, and resolving to take the advantage, kept up as hot a fire as

possible upon her during the whole time. Lieutenant Brereton, however,

with the assistance of some other brave men, soon extinguished the

fire. Then running to the ports he begged the seamen to come in again,

upbraiding them for deserting their quarters; but finding this had no

effect on them, he thought the more certain method of succeeding would be

to strike them with a sense of shame. He therefore loudly exclaimed, ‘Are

you Britons? You Englishmen! and fly from danger! For shame! For shame!’

This reproach had the desired effect; to a man they immediately returned

into the ship, repaired to their quarters, and renewed an inspirited fire

into the enemy.”

The end was in sight by nine o’clock, and it came within a very few

minutes of the hour.

“In about three hours from the commencement of the attack, the parapets

of the north and south bastions were almost beaten down, the guns were

mostly dismounted, and we could plainly see from the main-top of the

_Kent_ that the ruins from the parapet and merlons had entirely blocked

up those few guns which otherwise might have been fit for service. We

could easily discern, too, that there had been a great slaughter among

the enemy, who finding that our fire against them rather increased, hung

out the white flag, whereupon a cessation of hostilities took place, and

the Admiral sent Lieutenant Brereton (the only commissioned officer on

board the _Kent_ that was not killed or wounded) and Captain Coote of

the King’s regiment with a flag of truce to the fort, who soon returned,

accompanied by the French Governor’s son, with articles of capitulation.”

At the moment that the Governor hung out the flag of truce (“waved over

their walls a flag of truce,” in the Admiral’s own words) the landward

side of the fort was still holding Clive’s soldiers at bay. The firing

from the ramparts there continued for some little time after the flag on

the Governor’s palace had been lowered.

The formal surrender and giving up of the fort took place at three

o’clock in the afternoon. Says Admiral Watson in his dispatch: “I sent

Captain Latham of the _Tyger_ ashore to receive the keys and take

possession of the fort. Col. Clive marched in with the King’s troops

about five in the afternoon.” The _Kent’s_ log notes this: “5.30 p.m. The

Fort at Chandernagore fired 21 guns as a salute to H.M. Colours, after

being hoisted half an hour before.”

So Chandernagore fell. “It must be acknowledged,” to use the words of Dr.

Ives once more, “that the French made a gallant defence, as they stood

to their guns as long as they had any to fire. We never could learn

how many of their men were killed and wounded on the whole, though they

confessed they had forty dead carried from the south-east bastion. The

north-east bastion was also cleared of its defenders twice.”

“The fire of the ships,” says the Indian military historian Orme, “did as

much execution in three hours as the batteries on shore would have done

in several days.” “Few naval engagements have excited more admiration,”

says Sir John Malcolm, writing three-quarters of a century afterwards,

“and even at the present day, when the river is so much better known,

the success with which the largest vessels of the fleet were navigated

to Chandernagore and laid alongside the batteries of that settlement is

a subject of wonder.” Summing up results, Colonel Malleson says: “The

capture of Chandernagore was not less a seal to French dominion in Bengal

than it was the starting-point of British supremacy in that province.”

Admiral Watson in his dispatch states the enemy’s force thus: “They had

in the fort 1200 men, of which 500 were Europeans and 700 Blacks; 183

pieces of cannon, from 24-pounders and downwards; three small mortars,

and a considerable quantity of ammunition. Besides the ships and vessels

sunk below, to stop up the channel, they sank and ran ashore five large

ships above the fort, and we have taken four sloops and a snow.”

Dealing with the casualties on the British side, Admiral Watson proceeds

in these words: “The _Kent_ had 19 men killed and 49 wounded, the

_Tyger_ 13 killed and 50 wounded. Among the number killed, was my first

lieutenant, Mr. Samuel Perreau, and the master of the _Tyger_. Among the

wounded was, Mr. Pocock slightly hurt, Captain Speke and his son, by the

same cannon-ball, the latter had his leg shot off. Mr. Rawlins Hey, my

third lieutenant, had his thigh much shattered, and is in great danger.

Mr. Stanton, my fourth lieutenant, slightly wounded by splinters; but the

greatest part of the wounded have suffered much, being hurt chiefly by

cannon shot: Several of them cannot possibly recover.”

According to the _Kent’s_ log the flagship had three lower-deck guns

dismounted and three on the upper deck, and had 138 shot holes through

her engaged side, besides suffering severe damage aloft to masts and

rigging.

Next morning Chandernagore paid its formal salute to the victor. From the

_Kent’s_ log: “March 24th, 10 a.m., the Fort saluted the Admiral with 19

guns.” Then follows: “Fired 18 guns for the burial of the 1st Lieutenant

Perreau.” Lieutenant Rawlins Hey and Midshipman Speke died a few days

later.

After a ten days’ stay at Chandernagore, to rest the troops, arrange

for the occupation of the place and the disposal of the prisoners, the

men-of-war and the rest of the expedition returned to Fort William.

Further trouble with Suraj-u-daulah was looming ahead. The Nawab’s

troops that had started to intervene at Chandernagore had halted at

Plassey and gone into camp there. It was less than a hundred miles from

Calcutta, and the authorities strongly objected to their being so near.

There were no signs of any immediate withdrawal, although letters passed

continuously to and fro between the Council and Suraj-u-daulah. Each

side distrusted the other. Then began the series of intrigues between

certain members of the Council and Clive with Mir Jafier and disaffected

officials of the Nawab’s _entourage_, which led to the battle of Plassey

two months later. With the ramifications of the plot, the treachery of

the crafty Hindu go-between Omichand and how it was foiled, our narrative

does not concern itself, beyond the passing reference. Everybody knows

the ugly story of the “White” treaty and the “Red”; one genuine and the

other sham; one honestly signed at the Council table by Admiral Watson,

the other with the Admiral’s signature to it forged secretly, either by

the hand of Clive himself or by some underling at his instigation. The

battle of Plassey, from which the British _raj_ in the East, by common

consent, dates its rise, was the sequel, on the 23rd of the following

June.

To strengthen Clive’s small army the Royal Navy took over the garrisoning

of Chandernagore for the time being; occupying the place with a hundred

and forty of the flagship’s men, under Lieutenant Clarke of the _Kent_.

Communication between Clive’s army in the field and Calcutta was kept

open by way of Chandernagore and the _Bridgewater_, which ship was sent

some miles higher up the river and anchored there.

Fifty seaman from the East Indies Squadron with a lieutenant and

seven midshipmen in charge, accompanied Clive’s army, attached to the

artillery. Most of them were from the flagship, and one of the _Kent’s_

midshipmen, Mr. Shoreditch, was wounded in a hand-to-hand encounter with

one of the Nawab’s French officers.

More than that, however, the sailors had no small share in winning the

battle for England. At Plassey Clive, as he said, put his trust in God.

It was the sailors who kept his powder dry. It was their guns that

did the work in smashing up the dense masses of the Nawab’s levies in

the critical second stage of the battle, after the deluging monsoon

rain-storm that burst at noon, swamped the ammunition of Suraj-u-daulah’s

artillerymen. On such a detail as the smartness of Admiral Watson’s

handy-men with their tarpaulins and budge-skin powder-covers did the fate

of the epoch-making day of Plassey practically hinge. Only after it had

become plain with which side the fortune of the day rested did Mir Jafier

and his corps pass over and throw in their lot with Clive.

* * * * *

Within two months of Plassey Admiral Watson was dead. The climate killed

him in the end. For more than four months past he had been ailing,

and for the past four months had had among his papers the Admiralty’s

permission to return home on sick leave. But, like Nelson during the

last eighteen months of his glorious life while watching the enemy off

Toulon, he would not leave his post while there was duty to be done. The

inactivity after Chandernagore, in the sultry, steamy heats of the rainy

season in Lower Bengal, killed Admiral Watson.

A plain obelisk on a heavy square base in the graveyard compound of

St. John’s Cathedral, Calcutta, marks the Admiral’s resting-place. It

was erected by Mr. Holwell, the survivor of the Black Hole, during his

governorship a few years later, and is thus inscribed:—

Here lies interred the Body of

CHARLES WATSON, ESQUIRE,

Vice Admiral of the White,

Commander in Chief of His Majesty’s

Naval Forces in the East Indies,

Who departed this life

On the 16th day of August, 1757,

In the 44th year of his age.

_Geriah taken, February 13th, 1756.

Calcutta freed, January 11th, 1757.

Chandernagore taken, March 23rd, 1757._

Exegit monumentum aere perennius.

Monumentum aere perennius? Hardly that. Modern India has no place for

naval memories. Clive—and Clive only—holds the field.

Hos ego versiculos feci: tulit alter honores

—wrote Virgil once, in a moment of literary bitterness. If it be given

to those beyond the Veil to know of things on earth, and think, the Shade

of the gallant admiral might well express itself in terms hardly less

strong.

The East India Company erected a monument to the Admiral in Westminster

Abbey, and King George bestowed a baronetcy of the United Kingdom on his

only son—then a boy—in consideration of his father’s “great and eminent

services.”

_Est procul hinc_—the legend’s writ,

The frontier grave is far away,

_Qui ante diem periit_

_Sed miles, sed Prô Patriâ_.

Is it too extravagant to suggest that, with things as they then were,

with nearly five years of continuous war yet to come, and with enemies’

fleets in every sea, Admiral Watson, a man young in years for his high

position,[7] might, had he been spared, have well found opportunity for

achieving yet higher fame, even wider renown? His, too, in 1757, was

surely in a real sense a “frontier grave”—the grave of one

Who might have caught and claspt Renown,

And worn her chaplet here:—and there,

In haunts of jungle-poisoned air,

The flame of life went wavering down.

The flagship _Kent_, it so happened, did not long outlast her chief.

She had for some time past shown signs of being nearly worn out, and an

official survey of her, shortly after Admiral Watson’s death, resulted

in her condemnation as unfit for sea. She was “cast” and ordered to be

broken up, and on the 15th of September, a month all but a day from

the death of her Admiral, the pennant was hauled down on board the

_Kent_—still lying off Fort William—and the ship’s company were paid off

and drafted into the _Cumberland_, _Tyger_, and _Salisbury_.

So with the passing of the Admiral and his ship our story reaches its end.

Chandernagore, of course, is nowadays a French possession, a tiny

territory of three and a half square miles, with a railway station on the

line to Calcutta, where very few people ever get out. It was restored

to France six years after Admiral Watson took it, for no particular

reason it would appear, except that there had been a General Election in

England, and the new Ministry was desirous of reversing the policy of

its predecessors. Our beaten enemies got back almost everything that the

valour of our sailors and soldiers had won for England, in order that

the Treasury Bench might score a point in party politics. But we for our

part have no right to throw stones. We of the present day have seen much

the same thing happen elsewhere. Chandernagore has been twice retaken

since 1763, and twice given back. It was finally handed back to France

in 1816, after the Napoleonic War, the Foreign Office being under the

impression—so, at any rate, the story goes—that it was one of the West

India islands!

IV

BOSCAWEN’S BATTLE:—THE TAKING OF THE _TÉMÉRAIRE_

Over the seas and far away

“Old Dreadnought” steers to his fight to-day!

One of the best known of all our man-of-war names reappears on the roll

of the British fleet in the name _Téméraire_, now borne by one of our

new giant 18,000-ton battleships of the _Dreadnought_ type. This is the

story of how it came to be a British battleship name in the first place,

the story of the act of war which in the sequel led to that historic

man-of-war the “Fighting” _Téméraire_ figuring on another day among the

ships of Nelson’s fleet at Trafalgar, to fight there as the _Victory’s_

chief supporter in the fiercest of the fray.

How we came to have a _Téméraire_ in the British Navy the name of

course bears on its face. It was originally borne by one of Louis the

Fourteenth’s men-of-war, and at the date of its adoption by capture into

the British service, in 1759—“The Wonderful Year”—had been honourably

known in the French Navy for upwards of ninety years. The first

_Téméraire_ to sail the seas was so named, it would appear, by the Grand

Monarque himself, the name being appointed to a man-of-war of fifty-two

guns, built by contract in Holland for the French service, in the year

1668, when a war with England seemed at hand. King Louis, it is said,

further appointed to the _Téméraire_ on her naming, as a special and

distinctive figure-head, an elaborately carved and gorgeously coloured

effigy of himself in his celebrated “Lion’s Mane” wig, sworded and

spurred and wearing a military _just-au-corps_ tunic of cloth of gold

over a scarlet vest with crimson breeches and crimson stockings—the

orthodox attire of a French sea officer of the _Grand Corps_.

This first French _Téméraire_ was a ship that the British Navy of her

time saw something of. She formed one of the men-of-war present with the

allied French squadron which played so very peculiar a part when attached

to the Duke of York’s fleet in the battle of Solebay in 1672, and in the

same way also she was present at Prince Rupert’s three drawn battles

with De Ruyter in the following year. As an enemy a few years later, the

first French _Téméraire_ fought against us both at Beachy Head and in the

battle off Cape Barfleur, after which the _Téméraire_ escaped and found

refuge under the harbour batteries of St. Malo.

“_The Rash_” is what an official return on the French Navy, presented

to Parliament on the 9th of February, 1698, calls the _Téméraire_,

in accordance with the custom then in vogue of translating foreign

men-of-war names appearing in British official documents. It seems

a curious disguise for the name _Téméraire_ perhaps, although even

then it is hardly so grotesque as the names under which some of the

_Téméraire’s_ consorts figure in various House of Commons returns: “_The

Without Danger_,” for instance, for _Le Sans Pareil_; “_The Undertaker_”

or “_The Understanding_” (as two different official lists give it) for

_L’Entreprenante_, another ship; “_The Jolly_” for _Le Joli_; “_The

Fire_” for _Le Fier_; “_The Fiddle_” for _La Fidelle_, a frigate; the

“_Turkish Lady_” for another frigate, _La Turquoise_, and so on.

Two years after Barfleur—on the 28th of November, 1694—a crippled French

man-of-war was met with, a few miles to the south of the Lizard, by the

British man-of-war _Montagu_. She had been dismasted in a storm out in

the Atlantic and was nearly waterlogged and sinking; and after a few

shots in reply to the _Montagu’s_ challenging gun hauled her colours

down. The enemy’s ship was the “_Timmeraire_, of fifty-six guns,” in the

words of the _Montagu’s_ log. They found it impossible to save the prize,

either to rig jury masts or to take her in tow, as the weather came on

thick and stormy, and in the end cleared the crew out, and on the 3rd of

December abandoned the ship and set her on fire. That was the end of the

first French _Téméraire_.

Two other _Téméraires_ followed in the French Navy, and then we come to

the ship that became our own first _Téméraire_. This was the _Téméraire_,

of seventy-four guns, built in 1748, which, after fighting against us in

the battle which cost Admiral Byng his life, became prize of war three

years later to the man whose hand signed the order for Byng’s firing

party, Admiral Boscawen, on the day of Boscawen’s defeat of the French

Toulon fleet in Lagos Bay, on Monday, the 19th of August, 1759.

The taking of our future first _Téméraire_ was one result of the

determined attempt at the invasion of England that the French made in

1759. They had prepared a large army, and transports were assembled to

carry it across the Channel as soon as their Toulon fleet, by coming

round and joining hands with their Brest fleet, had given France the

command of the Channel by providing a sufficient force, as the French

counted, to hold the British fleet in check, and see the expedition

safely over. To leave port, however, was what the French Toulon

fleet—among which was the _Téméraire_—could not do and would not try,

until the British force blockading Toulon under Admiral Boscawen was out

of the way. The Brest fleet, at the same time, watched closely by Hawke’s

powerful fleet, as a mouse in its hole is watched by a cat, could not put

to sea with hope of success unless the Toulon fleet evaded Boscawen and

joined hands with it.

Chance threw an opportunity of escape in the way of the _Téméraire_ and

her consorts. Various reasons—damage to three of his ships in a somewhat

venturesome attack on some outlying vessels of the French fleet anchored

under the batteries that guarded the entrance to Toulon Roads, and a

general want of water and provisions on board all his ships—induced

Boscawen, in the last week of July, to withdraw temporarily to Gibraltar.

De la Clue, the French Admiral, on learning by chance where Boscawen had

gone and why, snatched at the offered occasion to make his sally. He put

to sea on the 5th of August, determined to risk the passage round.

The fortune of war at the outset, and for nearly half-way, made a show

of favouring the French. They managed to escape being sighted by the

frigates that Boscawen had posted on the look-out between Malaga and the

Straits. Not an English sail was sighted; nothing to cause disquietude

happened, until just as de la Clue’s ships were in the act of passing

Gibraltar.

With a brisk Levanter blowing over their taffrails and a thick haze

on the sea, towards dusk on Saturday evening, the 17th of August, the

Toulon fleet, after standing well over to the Barbary shore so as to

give Boscawen’s ships at Gibraltar the go-by, was being carried rapidly

past where the British fleet was lying, when suddenly, just as the

elated Frenchmen were assuring themselves of good success for the rest

of their cruise, almost by accident, as it were, at the eleventh hour

they stumbled on the only one of Boscawen’s look-outs that they had yet

to pass. Just off Ceuta, a little to the eastward of that place, the

_Gibraltar_, a twenty-gun ship, quite unexpectedly to both sides, loomed

out of the mist close alongside the passing French fleet.

The mischief, from the French point of view, was done. The captain of the

_Gibraltar_ realized at once that the strange fleet he saw heading out of

the Mediterranean and close at hand could only be the enemy from Toulon.

He promptly went about and hauled in for the Spanish coast, firing signal

guns of alarm. The French for their part seemed to have been too much

taken aback to act. As much surprised at the meeting apparently as was

Captain McCleverty of the _Gibraltar_ himself, Admiral de la Clue made

no effort to stop or to silence the tell-tale British scout, although

he might have done so. He simply contented himself with putting out all

his lights, and then he continued to stand on with all sail set, heading

west-north-west, so as to get clear away and out into the Atlantic.

Champions of the fleet · 第 7 / 18 段