NATIONALISM: THE IDEAL

What is the ideal which we must set before us? The first and foremost is

the ideal of nationalism. Now what is Nationalism? It is, I conceive, a

process through which a nation expresses itself and finds itself, not in

isolation from other nations but, as part of a great scheme by which, in

seeking its own expression and therefore its own identity, it materially

assists the self-expression and self-realization of other nations as well.

Diversity is as real as Unity. And in order that the unity of the world

may be established it is essential that each nationality should proceed on

its own lines and find fulfilment in self-expression and self-realisation.

The Nationality of which I am speaking must not be confused with the

conception of nationality as it exists in Europe to-day. Nationalism in

Europe is an aggressive nationalism, a selfish nationalism, a commercial

nationalism of gain and loss. The gain of France is a loss of Germany, and

the gain of Germany is a loss of France. Therefore French nationalism is

nurtured on the hatred of Germany and German nationalism is nurtured in

the hatred of France. It is not yet realised that you cannot hurt Germany

without hurting Humanity and in consequence hurting France; and that you

cannot hurt France without hurting Humanity, and in consequence hurting

Germany. That is European nationalism; that is not the nationalism of

which I am speaking to you to-day. I contend that each nationality

constitutes a particular stream of the great unity, but no nation can

fulfil itself until it becomes itself and at the same time realises its

identity with Humanity. The whole problem of nationalism is therefore to

find that stream and to face the destiny. If you find the current and

establish a continuity with the past, then the process of self-expression

has begun, and nothing can stop the growth of nationality.

Throughout the pages of Indian history, I find a great purpose unfolding

itself. Movement after movement has swept over this vast country,

apparently creating hostile forces, but in reality stimulating the

vitality and moulding the life of the people into one great nationality.

If the Aryans and the non-Aryans met, it was for the purpose of making one

people out of them. Brahmanism with its great culture succeeded in binding

the whole of India and was indeed a mighty unifying force. Buddhism with

its protests against Brahmanism served the same great historical purposes

and from Magadha to Taxila was one great Buddhistic empire which succeeded

not only in broadening the basis of Indian unity, but in creating what is

perhaps more important, the greater India beyond the Himalayas and beyond

the seas, so much so that the sacred city where we have met may be

regarded as a place of pilgrimage of millions and millions of people of

Asiatic races. Then came the Mahomedans of divers races, but with one

culture which was their common heritage. For a time it looked as if there

was a disintegrating force, an enemy to the growth of Indian nationalism,

but the Mahomedans made their home in India, and, while they brought a new

outlook and a wonderful vitality to the Indian life, with infinite wisdom,

they did as little as possible to disturb the growth of life in the

villages where India really lives. This new outlook was necessary for

India: and if the two sister streams met, it was only to fulfil themselves

and face the destiny of Indian history. Then came the English with their

alien culture, their foreign methods, delivering a rude shock to this

growing nationality; but the shock has only completed the unifying process

so that the purpose of history is practically fulfilled. The great Indian

nationality is in sight. It already stretches its hands across the

Himalayas not only to Asia but to the whole of the world, not

aggressively, but to demand its recognition, and to offer its

contribution, I desire to emphasise that there is no hostility between the

ideal of nationality and that of world-peace. Nationalism is the process

through which alone will world-peace come. A full and unfettered growth of

nationalism is necessary for world-peace just as a full and unfettered

growth of individuals is necessary for nationality. It is the conception

of aggressive nationality in Europe that stands in the way of peace; but

once the truth is grasped that it is not possible for a nation to inflict

a loss on another nation without at the same time inflicting a loss on

itself, the problem of Humanity is solved. The essential truth of

nationality lies in this, that it is necessary for each nation to develop

itself, express itself and realise itself, so that Humanity itself may

develop itself, express itself and realise itself. It is my belief that

this truth of nationality will endure, although, for the moment, unmindful

of the real issue, the nations are fighting amongst themselves and, if I

am not mistaken, it is the very instinct of selfishness and

self-preservation which will ultimately solve the problem, not the narrow

and the mistaken selfishness of the present, but a selfishness

universalized by intellect and transfigured by spirit, a selfishness that

will bring home to the nations of the world that in the efforts to put

down their neighbours lies their own ruin and suppression.

We have, therefore, to foster the spirit of Nationality. True development

of the Indian nation must necessarily lie in the path of Swaraj. A

question has often been asked as to what is Swaraj. Swaraj is indefinable

and is not to be confused with any particular system of Government. There

is also the difference in the world between Swarajya and Samrajya. Swaraj

is the natural expression of the national mind. The full outward

expression of that mind covers, and must necessarily cover, the whole

life history of a nation. Yet it is true that Swaraj begins when the true

development of a nation begins, because, as I have said, Swaraj is the

expression of the national mind.

The question of nationalism, therefore, looked at from another point of

view, is the same question as that of Swaraj. The question of all

questions in India to-day is the attainment of Swaraj.

Freedom Through Disobedience · 第 4 / 49 题