former Baptism was valid, or if he was rebaptized _sub conditione_,
must make a complete confession of the sins of his former life. Let
the confessor treat him with all charity, assist him with questions,
being careful, however, not to institute a rigid examination. The
confessor may ask him if he has uttered blasphemies or insults against
the Catholic Church, or induced others to do so; if he has entertained
doubts concerning his religion and how long he despised or neglected the
truth. If the penitent has committed many grave sins, the confessor must
be careful not to reprove him severely or harshly, rather praise his
good disposition in confessing them, exhort him kindly but earnestly,
henceforth to lead a truly Christian and good life. No great penance
should be imposed at first, so as not to dispirit the penitent. Finally,
the confessor administers absolution, _absolute_ or _sub conditione_,
according as Baptism was either not repeated or was again administered
_sub conditione_.
If a non-Catholic in the hour of death wishes to embrace the Catholic
faith, he must make the _professio fidei_ before two witnesses, at least
with regard to the doctrines which must be believed _necessitate medii
et præcepti_. To avoid difficulties later this act should be taken down
in writing, and the document signed. After which the dying person may be
prepared by acts of faith, hope, and charity, contrition, and purpose of
amendment; he should then confess; absolution from excommunication and
from sin should be given him; after this the viaticum and Extreme Unction.
But if the dying person shows no disposition to accept the Catholic
faith, the priest should seek to gain his confidence, and then gradually
approach the question of his salvation. Let the priest endeavor first to
awaken in the dying man an act of faith in all that God has revealed,
especially in all that must be believed _necessitate medii_, then an
act of hope, of perfect contrition, and resignation. In such a case it
is not prudent to ask the man bluntly to join the true Church, for fear
of exposing him to a great temptation. In order, however, to be able to
administer to him the conditional absolution, he should be induced to
acknowledge himself a sinner before God, and, having elicited contrition,
to declare also that he wished to be assisted as much as possible by the
services of the priest the better to obtain eternal life.[935] Absolution
_sub conditione_ can then be administered to the dying man, by secretly
pronouncing the form of words, without making the sign of the cross.
CHAPTER II
THE TREATMENT OF PENITENTS IN DIFFERENT EXTERNAL CIRCUMSTANCES
74. The Confession of Children.
The confessor must devote special care to the confessions of children,
for this is a matter of much importance.[936] As with adults, so with
children, confession exercises a great influence upon the spiritual life,
and forms a factor in their education which cannot be estimated too
highly. For even a child can commit sins with full advertence or malice,
and hence requires the Sacrament of Penance in order to recover the lost
life of grace, and to obtain the necessary assistance in preserving
itself from future sin. The child also has its temptations; evil
inclinations and passions awaken in the child’s soul. Who does not know
that many a child is entangled in a net of evil habits and occasions of
the worst kind? In truth, the child stands much in need of supernatural
strength in order to preserve its most precious treasure of innocence.
This strength conferred by grace is more necessary to the child than all
exhortations and instructions. A good confession will eradicate obstinate
faults and evil habits which have long defied all the arts and wisdom
of educational systems. Confession is in many cases the sole means of
discovering in the child hidden and ruinous habits and of correcting
them, thus safeguarding its innocence and purity. Even when parents
and the other agencies of education, home influence and the school,
fail in their duty, attaching importance only to the cultivation of the
intelligence and to outward morality and propriety, the confessional can
still be the child’s salvation by shielding its heart from evil. This
great and fundamental significance of the confessional for the child and
its education must be realized by the confessor. He will then readily
undergo the labor involved in the preparation of children for confession,
and the confessions themselves. Here, preëminently, he will scatter the
good seed from which he may expect an abundant harvest. Here he is the
true representative of the divine Friend of children, of Him who suffered
the little children to come unto Him, of Him who uttered the momentous
words: “He that shall receive one such little child in My name, receiveth
Me” (Matt. xviii. 5; xix. 13-15).
I. The first consideration is the admission and the preparation of the
children for confession.
In the admission to confession, age must certainly be considered, but
not chiefly; the mental capacities and development must be taken into
account. The declaration of the IV. Council of the Lateran that a child
is bound to receive the Sacrament of Penance as soon as it has reached
the years of discretion (_anni discretionis_) is based on the nature of
the case. But when this period arrives cannot be precisely stated in
years and days; it depends much on individual circumstances. The seventh
year is generally regarded by theologians as the limit, and they teach
that a child who has completed the seventh year is bound to receive the
Sacrament of Penance. And if a child has average mental capacity, has
received religious training at home, and from the sixth year regular
religious instruction at school, it _can_, and generally _should_, go to
confession when it is seven years old, or even before this, as would be
desirable if such a child were seriously ill, or if there were reasons
for supposing that it had committed grave sin. In the latter event the
child would be bound, in order to comply with the precept of the Church,
to confess within a year.[937] But as it happens that very many children
are not sufficiently developed and instructed so early, it follows that
the regular admission is left to the judgment of the priest. St. Charles
Borromeo gave his clergy the following precept on this head: _Qui ad
septem aut octo annos pervenerint, pro modulo de necessitate et virtute
sacramenti illudque frequentandi instruentur_.[938] And the Cologne
Provincial Council of the year 1860 decrees that the first confession of
children _shall not be put off longer than the ninth year_. The priest
should certainly not delay the preparation of a child for his first
confession any longer, unless its incapacity is demonstrated. With the
seventh or eighth year the children should be admitted to instruction
for confession, and if a child shows in the course of this instruction
that it has arrived at a sufficient understanding of the Sacrament of
Penance, it should be immediately prepared for it. But those children
who are not qualified should take part in the preparation for the next
(second) confession of the course, in order that they may be admitted
then, or later, in any case as soon as possible, to this holy Sacrament.
For the zealous priest will not only instruct the children concerning the
Sacrament at the beginning of every school year, as is the regulation
in many dioceses, but each reception (at least in the children’s first
years) will be preceded by a solid preparation consisting in a general
repetition of the essential truths. If the less gifted children are
present at these instructions and preparations, and if special attention
is given to them, they will soon be in a condition to make a good
confession. The final decision concerning the capacity or incapacity
of a child to receive absolution, or, in other words, concerning its
dispositions, must be left to the confessor, who will and must arrive at
some settled judgment on this point, and give absolution conditionally or
unconditionally, or postpone it, as he shall find necessary.
The special instruction which precedes the children’s confession must
be given according to a definite and practical plan, and with great
care and prudence.[939] At the outset the children must be solemnly
admonished that they are shortly to be admitted to their first
confession, and that for this purpose they are to receive a special
instruction. The importance of this instruction must be impressed upon
them as an initiatory preparation for the reception of the Sacrament,
thus encouraging them to diligent application and attention. There
is probably no religious instruction which more attracts little ones
and more wins their interest, than the instruction for confession, on
account of the exceedingly beautiful truths which are here discussed.
It must be emphasized and brought home to the children that it is a
great happiness, an unmerited favor to be cleansed from sin in the holy
Sacrament of Penance; it would be ill timed to represent confession
as something hard or difficult or as a kind of punishment. One must
rather awaken enthusiasm within them, so that they may take pleasure in
preparing themselves for it carefully, and they must be assured that the
confessor will make easy everything which they think will be difficult
in the confessional if only they show good will. Admission to confession
must also be represented to them in the light of a distinction, and as a
reward of diligence and attention.
As to the matter of the instruction,—the doctrine of the Sacrament
of Penance must be treated thoroughly, clearly, attractively, and in
a manner adapted to a child’s intelligence. Then the most important
doctrines of the catechism with reference to confession must be repeated,
especially the doctrine of God and His attributes; furthermore, the
doctrine of sin and the Redemption. These truths are to be set forth
in a manner at once easily intelligible to the mind and stimulating to
the feelings. Particular care must be taken that the children learn to
say correctly and with understanding the usual prayers before and after
confession. It is very useful at the end of this instruction (of the
remote preparation) and shortly before the confession, to make with
the children an examination of conscience. In this manner as complete
a confession as possible will result, and many abuses be prevented;
especially will children not accuse themselves of things which they do
not in the least understand and which they have not committed; while, at
the same time, the suitable, intelligible, and becoming expressions for
the different sins will be put into their mouths.[940] Furthermore, it is
much to be recommended that the children should, in common, be incited
to contrition and purpose of amendment (say in the Church, immediately
before confession) by laying before them the motives for contrition,
and this slowly, intelligibly, and in a manner adapted to children;
afterwards repeating to them a short and forcible formula of contrition
and purpose of amendment, concluding with another short exhortation to
sincerity in confession and to gratitude to God after the confession.[941]
II. Treatment of children in the confessional.
If the children have been well prepared, the confessor’s work is much
facilitated. But he must, nevertheless, always bear in mind the words of
St. Alphonsus de Liguori: “_The confessor must expend all his love on the
children, and treat them in the gentlest manner possible_.”[942]
But even when there has been careful preparation the confessor must:
(1) see that the confession is a complete one, and supply any possible
defects in it; (2) instruct the child, and, if necessary, dispose it
for absolution; (3) judge of his disposition, and, according to this
judgment, give absolution conditionally or unconditionally or defer it.
In addition to the rules already laid down and discussed, the following
special remarks will be serviceable:—
1. If the confession of the child is _incomplete_ or vague, the confessor
can easily discover the principal sins or at least sufficient matter by
means of questions if the child has some little intelligence. He may ask
the child if it has neglected daily prayers, if it has through his own
fault missed Mass on Sundays or holidays (especially during vacation
time); if it has behaved disrespectfully in Church, by laughing, talking,
looking about, and disturbing others; if it has been disobedient and
naughty towards his parents and superiors; if it has quarreled with his
brothers and sisters and other children; if it has been angry or cursed
in anger; if it has taken dainties by stealth or stolen; if it has lied
and said untrue things of other children.[943] Where there are grave
sins, he must, of course, ask the number, if it was not stated; and he
must insist upon the child’s examining itself concerning the number,
and stating it as precisely as possible. Everything connected with
children’s confessions must claim the confessor’s attention, but he must
be especially careful that they learn to confess well. Children will have
great difficulty in giving account of their thoughts, desires, and the
intentions by which they have been influenced, and the confessor may thus
find himself obliged to put questions on these matters.
2. If the child has made a definite confession, but the confessor still
believes that there has been insincerity,—from false shame or fear, or,
perhaps, from inability to make the sin known, it often requires great
prudence to detect the sin omitted.[944] It is mostly sins against the
sixth and seventh commandments which, for the above reasons, children
conceal. If the confessor therefore, suspects that a sin against the
sixth commandment has been omitted, he must exercise prudence in two
ways: first, that he does not, by unsuitable questions, make the child
acquainted with sins of which it knows nothing, and that he does not put
the questions in such a general way that they fail to disclose the sin.
If the child confesses that it spoke immodest words, or did something
immodest, or permitted it, the confessor must not at once conclude that
he has to do with real sins against the sixth commandment; for sometimes
children take unbecoming words, which are no sin against holy purity,
for immodest words and confess them as sins; they also regard certain
things as immodest actions which are by no means sinful,[945] but on
the contrary necessary. There is ground for this supposition especially
when an otherwise good child accuses itself of having very frequently
committed such sins.... The confessor may also ask the child if it knows
what impurity is. As he must not investigate the matter further he must
form his judgment in accordance with the whole confession or suspend a
definite judgment; and he should not forget that it is better to leave
a confession doubtfully complete than to expose innocence to danger by
asking questions. But if he discovers that the case is really so, and
that the child suffers from _conscientia erronea_ on this point, he must
suitably instruct it. If, however, it is clear the child has accused
itself of sins against holy purity, and the confessor believes that real
sins are in question,[946] let him not fail to investigate what led up to
them—a sinful, necessary, or voluntary occasion, or a vicious habit. Not
infrequently the confessor will discover the distressing fact that home
and school, instead of being nurseries of that flower of the virtues,
the child’s innocence, are the cause of its destruction, either with or
without the fault of parents or superiors; and this through sleeping
together, the bad example or open seduction of corrupted brothers and
sisters, some imprudence on the part of parents, or the talk, buffoonery,
and doings of some tainted child at school. Such circumstances will
not only awaken deep and painful regret in the confessor, but also his
endeavors as physician of the soul, to help and heal, and save the
poor child from complete ruin. He must here apply with special care
and prudence the rules concerning occasions and sinful habits. If the
confessor perceives that a child suffers from _false shame_, or that it
is immoderately timid, he must seek to induce it to candor and confidence
by kind persuasion, affectionate encouragement, or also by serious
exhortation.
In the preparatory instruction the confessor must specially accentuate
the seal of the confession, and not fail to represent the confessor to
the child as the substitute of Christ, who, like our divine Savior,
receives children (and children who have sinned also) as a loving father,
and as the Good Shepherd rejoices over the return of the child by a
sincere confession.
3. If a child has concealed a sin against the seventh commandment, it
is easier for the confessor to discover the insincerity. He must ask
what was stolen, where and from whom it was stolen, if other things than
eatables were stolen, what was done with them, etc. Stealing and eating
dainties by stealth generally go together, as the longing for these
dainties often makes the child a thief. Another form of theft is keeping
back money when parents or others have sent the child to make purchases.
Study and experience, especially in the cure of souls, and light from
above, for which the confessor must always pray before confessions and
during them in more difficult cases, will enable him to discover other
points which cannot be here discussed.
The next task of the confessor is _to instruct the child, to prescribe
remedies, and to dispose it for the absolution_. The sins which have
been confessed will furnish the occasion for the instruction; but
instruction concerning the necessary truths of faith may also be
required, especially when absolution cannot be deferred. The confessor
must particularly inform the child concerning the malice and hatefulness
and evil consequences of its sins; then also concerning the beauty and
rewards of virtue and the duties of its station. Nor should he fail to
remind the children of their sublime pattern, the divine Child Jesus. The
confessor should inspire them with love and confidence in the Blessed
Virgin, their heavenly Mother, and teach them devotional practices in
her honor and service. Finally, he should recommend to them, as a means
of obtaining virtue, zealous and regular prayer, recollection of the
presence of God, and avoidance of bad companions; and let him not tire
of telling the children all this over and over again, and implanting it
in their hearts. It will remain there, and in due time bring forth good
fruit. Though he has imparted these precepts and exhortations during
the religious instruction, he should repeat them at the confession in
suitable form; they will be more effective there; but they must be
adapted to the intelligence of the child and be short and forcible.
With the performance of this duty he must combine another, the
healing of the wounds of the child’s soul. This healing begins with
the acknowledgment of the evil in the examination of conscience and
confession, is carried on by the sorrow, and completed by the absolution,
through which grace is poured into the soul. By means of the instruction
which the confessor gives the child, he will seek to move it to real
sorrow and firm purpose of amendment. This is a principal task of the
confessor in children’s confessions. How often and how easily the latter
become invalid, or doubtfully valid, from the child’s having been too
superficial and thoughtless in awakening sorrow and firm purpose, not
having been properly attentive during the preparation, and having
repeated an act of contrition and purpose of amendment more with the
mouth than with the heart. The confessor must have due regard for this,
and employ the necessary care for warding off such evil. If the immediate
preparation for confession was a good one, he may set his mind at rest
as regards most of the children; nevertheless he will here, once more,
seek to move the child to sorrow and renewal of purpose in a few forcible
words. But if the immediate preparation above described was entirely left
to the individual children, and if the confessor has misgivings about it,
he must supply what is wanting by short but earnest admonitions.
Let the confessor be persuaded that his endeavors are not in vain, and
even if it should be his experience that the child has turned to no
advantage these preparations for confession, let him not be disheartened.
The child will recognize the representative of Christ in him better
in the confessional than at the instruction, and if he speaks as such,
inspired by a pure intention and a holy zeal for the love of Jesus, he
may confidently expect that his words, aided by the grace of God, will
make their way to the child’s heart, and there find fruitful soil. The
child’s heart, though fickle and thoughtless, is not so insensible to
contrition; the feeling of gratitude and love is there, and the love
of God is more easily excited in it. Still easier will it be for the
confessor to move the child to a firm purpose of amendment. In this
work of healing he must pay special attention to certain sins, which
often occur with children, and are particularly ruinous in them—lying,
stealing, and impurity.
(_a_) If the child shows a tendency to lying, the confessor must first of
all emphasize the sinfulness of lying, as it is often scarcely regarded
as a sin and confessed as a matter of custom, in many cases, it must be
feared, without due sorrow and purpose of amendment. He should point out
to the child the particular hatefulness of lying, as expressed by the
Holy Ghost in Holy Writ: “Lying lips are an abomination to the Lord”
(Proverbs xii. 22), and that “a lie is a foul blot in a man” (Eccles.
xx. 26); that God, as the eternal truth, especially hates, detests, and
punishes lying (Eccles. vii. 14); that men also detest a liar, for one
who has once lied is not trusted again; that lying brings a child no
good, as everything comes to light sooner or later.
(_b_) If the child has stolen something, the confessor must inquire
concerning the cause of the theft. Causes of theft may be: _Want_, in the
case of very poor children, who do not receive sufficient food, or who
cannot procure the necessary articles for school use. This cause will be
discovered without much difficulty by the question: “What did you steal?”
“What did you do with the stolen money?” Of course such children must be
treated leniently, but forbidden to steal again; at the same time they
should be told that if they are again in need of anything, to come to
him, the confessor (or the parish priest), and make known their trouble,
and they will be helped. Sensuality may be another cause; inducing them
to pilfer sweets, or buy them with stolen money. These children should
be earnestly admonished, often to think that God sees them. Finally, a
cause of stealing may be _an innate or acquired tendency_. In these cases
the amendment of the child is very difficult, but the confessor should
not give up hope, even when the tendency is deeply rooted. In the first
place, he should point out to the child the sinfulness of stealing,
and suggest the necessary measures (according to the circumstances)
for overcoming and eradicating the evil—daily renewal of purpose and
prayer for grace, recollection of the presence of God. If the children
are induced by their parents to steal, the confessor can only command
them not to obey their parents in future, and to declare that they must
obey God who has forbidden stealing; the rest he must leave to the
grace of God. If the child is led into stealing by others, it must, of
course, give up all intercourse with them at once, and (according to
the circumstances) inform parents and teachers of the fact. The duty of
restitution is not to be imposed upon children, as they are generally
incapable of making restitution,[947] excepting the case where the child
still possessed the stolen object; it should then be admonished to
restore the object, in order effectually to deter it from stealing.[948]
(_c_) The most dangerous and worst sin with children is that of
_impurity_. If a child accuses itself of this, and if the priest
believes that real sins of impurity are in question, he must investigate
if the child has fallen into them through his _own desire_, or through
the _seduction_ of others. If the former is the case, the confessor
should point out clearly and in a manner adapted to its comprehension,
the heinousness of this sin, which ruins body and soul, and makes us,
as does no other sin, an object of horror to an infinitely pure God. He
should remind the child of our divine Redeemer at the pillar, where,
by the dreadful pain and shame which He suffered, He atoned for this
sin. All this he should set before the child in eloquent, impressive
words, so that it may recognize how much his confessor detests these
sins and loves the virtue of purity. Let the confessor take occasion
to glorify this holy virtue, pointing out how much it is loved by God
and man, how much praised by the Holy Ghost, how it ennobles a man,
making him like the angels. This recommendation of holy purity will be
especially fruitful if accompanied by a special devotion to holy and
chaste young saints, especially to the Virgin of virgins, to St. Agnes,
St. Aloysius, St. Stanislaus, and St. John Berchmanns. In this manner
let him bring the child to a detestation of its sins, and to a firm and
determined purpose of resisting wicked desires and all temptations of
Satan, and to adopt the necessary means for this. As means of amendment
he can prescribe according to circumstances: daily renewal of the good
resolutions, daily prayer to the Blessed Virgin, frequent and regular
reception of the holy Sacraments; especially confessions each time the
sin is committed (this latter remedy is particularly to be recommended
if the sin has already become habitual, or has led to pollution). Other
devotional exercises are the honoring of St. Aloysius, especially by
the six Sundays of Aloysius (the celebration of which may very well be
recommended to older children); little mortifications for the purpose of
overcoming sensuality are also very appropriate. If _seduction_ by others
was the cause of the fall, the confessor must direct the child to avoid
intercourse with the evil companion; but if this is morally impossible
(for instance, when older brothers and sisters, or children of the same
school, are the seducers), he must give suitable rules by means of which
the immediate occasion may become a remote one. Whether the child may be
commanded to denounce the seducer to parents or superiors depends upon
circumstances, and the priest must examine into these; a denunciation is
a very efficacious means by which the sins of others also may be checked.
He must then tell the child how it can do this.
The third task devolving upon the confessor is _to judge of the child’s
disposition_, and according to his decision to give absolution or to
defer it. If the child has made a sincere confession, answered candidly
the confessor’s questions, listened attentively to his exhortations,
said the act of contrition devoutly and earnestly, if its behavior
has been generally good (before confession also, in the church, at
the preparation), or if in answer to the confessor’s question it has
declared that it was sorry for its sins, and that it wished to amend, the
confessor may be satisfied as to its dispositions. If he still doubts as
to the child’s dispositions (even after he has taken pains to dispose
it, for, in doubt, the confessor must, as shown above, seek to dispose
the penitent), or if he doubts as to the necessary _usus rationis_, and
if the child will not come again for two or three months (as is mostly
the case) or if it is in danger of death, he should give conditional
absolution. This also is allowed (in a case of doubtful disposition)
when the child has confessed venial sins only, and it is not likely
that it will soon come to confession again. Concerning the postponement
of absolution, see the principles laid down above, which apply here
also.[949]
As to the penance, let the confessor observe the teaching discussed above
(§ 33). Let him be careful not to impose any severe penance upon the
child, though it should be easier at one time, and severer at another,
corresponding to the sins. Moreover the penance should not be extended
over any long period, on account of the forgetfulness of children; nor
be such as the child must perform before others, and thus be exposed to
confusion.
In conclusion, we briefly refer to the question: How often should
children confess? If there are diocesan regulations on this point,—and
there are in most dioceses,—they must, of course, be observed. Where
no such direction exists, the zealous and conscientious priest will—as
confession is of such great importance for children, and as it is one
of the most powerful means of preservation from sin and the practice
of virtue, especially with those who have not yet made their first
communion—assuredly be glad to follow the precept which St. Charles
Borromeo gave to his clergy, namely, to induce children to confess
frequently. Let confession four times a year be the rule, and if he
considers it necessary, on account of particular circumstances, he
will readily grant the children more frequent opportunities; those who
are preparing for their first communion, especially, he will admit to
confession frequently during the last year before the reception; say,
every month, as is the regulation in some dioceses.[950]
75. The Confession of Young Unmarried People.
Youth, the springtime of life, is the most beautiful, but at the same
time the most dangerous, period of existence. The young man and the young
woman, more or less removed from parental care and observation, come into
closer contact with the world; many young people are obliged to leave the
parental roof to learn a business or trade, or to earn money for their
own support or for that of their relations, in factories, workshops, or
in strange houses as servants. And the dangers which, either temporarily
or constantly threaten them in these places, are not slight. Others,
more happily situated, can remain at home, but even here they are not
sheltered from all the dangers which the world, and contact with it,
prepare for them. And youth is so trustful, so easily beguiled, dazzled,
and misled; the youthful heart is so susceptible, the youthful ear so
open, evil often finds its way to the guileless heart in the guise of
what is good or harmless or indifferent; it is excused, or represented as
necessary, whereas virtue is despised as weakness or reviled as folly, or
denied as impossible. In the heart the passions and the sensual impulses
awaken, while the enemy of all good constantly watches to achieve the
ruin of the soul. The greatest dangers are _pleasure, bad company, bad
books, and human respect_. Therefore is it so very important that the
young should have an experienced, wise, circumspect confessor who knows
youth well,—the youthful heart with its inclinations, the youthful mind
with its aspirations and the dangers that beset its path; a confessor
who can admonish, instruct, and guide it, incite it, and awaken its
enthusiasm, restrain and warn it; who will hold fast to right principles,
but enforce them with wise moderation; who will lead his young penitents
into the ways of goodness and virtue without exciting their resistance—a
confessor who has a warm heart for youth. Let him, therefore, gladly
take upon himself the difficult but noble and blessed task of being a
father and guide to youth. Of this labor St. John Chrysostom[951] says
truly: “What is equal to the art of guiding the souls of the young, of
forming their minds and hearts? He who is equipped with the capacity
for it must exercise more care than a painter or a sculptor upon his
work.” That the confessor of young people may work with success it is
necessary _that he should win their hearts_ by the absolute confidence
with which his truly fatherly love inspires them. Let him not repel these
young people by cold, harsh treatment, but make due allowance for their
weakness, their inexperience, their inconstancy; they will then follow
his instructions, admonitions, and counsels with docility and with the
enthusiasm which is peculiar to youth. Moreover, let him make the work of
confessing easy to them so far as may be, in order that they may _gladly_
and _often_ confess and communicate. If it is possible, let him induce
and accustom them to the constant habit of confessing every month, or at
least every two or three months; for frequent confession and communion is
of especial benefit to young people, in order—(1) to preserve them from
sinful _habits_, for they will rise the quicker from sin the oftener they
approach the Sacrament of Penance, and sin cannot settle into a habit
if the heart is quickly cleansed from it. In any case the beginnings
will be easily overcome. If, however, a sinful habit has already taken
root, frequent confession and communion is the most certain, often the
only, remedy. (2) By it _they accustom themselves to pious exercises_,
which are learnt and performed more easily in youth than later on, and
by continued practice they will be confirmed in piety, which is itself a
firm support of weak and vacillating youth, a safe and protecting bulwark
against danger.
(3) _They will then also receive the holy Sacraments frequently in
later life, and will be preserved from that pernicious fear of the
confessional_, from which so many men and women suffer in our days.
For, as the Holy Ghost teaches, and experience proves, a youth will not
forsake easily in old age the path which he trod in early years. But
those who in youth seldom receive the holy Sacraments will, as experience
also proves, shun confession more and more as age advances.[952]
When the confessor has a suspicion that his young penitents have not
confessed sincerely, he may (as it shall seem to him advisable, and
having regard always to the rules applicable to questioning) ask if they
have been much troubled by temptations against holy purity, if they have
had intercourse with corrupt people, if they have read bad books? He may
also ask, especially where the preceding questions were answered in the
affirmative, if they have done anything immodest or permitted it? But
in all these questions let the confessor be modest and careful in his
expressions, lest he wound by awkward questions and teach the penitent
some sin before unknown to him, or excite his curiosity. He will more
easily attain to his end with young men, as these are generally more open
than persons of the other sex. Sometimes young people of both sexes do
not know what a sin of impurity is, although they accuse themselves of
impure thoughts.
_The faults peculiar to youth_ are:—
(_a_) _Disobedience_ to parents and superiors, which results in
much evil. The confessor must find out in what they have been
disobedient—neglecting divine service, religious instructions and the
holy Sacraments, attending forbidden entertainments, frequenting bad
company, keeping up dangerous and sinful connections with persons of
the other sex (familiarities, flirtations). Then let him point out the
evil consequences of their disobedience, the obligation of obeying which
still remains in force when they have become older, are earning money, or
supporting their parents, in fact as long as they remain under parental
control. He should remind them of the promises of the fourth commandment,
and the threats of God against those children who disobey this
commandment. At the same time let him instill in their hearts reverence
and love for their parents and superiors. Then let him lay special
stress upon sincerity toward parents, superiors, and the confessor; and
inculcate a deep abhorrence of dissimulation and lying, which make the
education, protection, and guidance of inexperienced youth impossible,
and expose it to great dangers.
(_b_) _Love of pleasure._ It excites the young man (and also the young
woman) to a craving for enjoyment, withdraws him more or less from useful
pursuits. It leads the young man into dangerous society, the young woman
into ruinous and sinful intimacies, which are secretly and prematurely
carried on, and are fruitful in sins and excesses; it ultimately leads
both of them into disobedience toward their parents, to lying, to
extravagance, to deception and theft practiced on parents, and to still
worse things. Moreover, it takes from them all devotion and fear of God.
(_c_) If love of pleasure appears more in young men, _desire of pleasing_
is characteristic of young women; it induces vanity, levity, distraction,
and sins against chastity. The confessor should combat these passions
with all his zeal and show how they may be suppressed.
He should recommend to young people as excellent means of acquiring and
cultivating the fear of the Lord and true virtue:—
1. _Regular daily prayer, and attendance at divine service_, Mass,
sermons, and Christian instruction. As long as a young man or a young
woman say their daily prayers and attend Mass, it is well with them;
but as soon as they begin to grow negligent in these practices, it is a
certain sign that they are no longer in the path of virtue, and if they
have not yet reached the broad highway of vice, they are certainly on the
road which very soon leads into it. Experience teaches that a man does
not become all at once corrupt and wicked; he usually falls imperceptibly
and by degrees. He no longer confesses and communicates regularly every
four weeks,—first five elapse, then six or seven; morning and night
prayers are no longer said punctually and kneeling,—they are sometimes
omitted, shortened, said in bed, now and then the religious instruction
and the afternoon devotion are missed, and excuses are forthcoming;
at the same time there is no longer the earnest endeavor to resist
temptation, there is no longer the same fear of sin. Upon the lesser
negligences supervene greater ones, and upon the smaller faults greater
sins. This is the usual progress. Let the confessor, therefore, urge
punctual prayer and regular attendance at divine service.
Many young men and women cannot attend at Mass on weekdays; if they
are absent from it on Sundays also, they are not only robbed of many
necessary graces, but they neglect the first duty of man, the service
of God, become more and more estranged from God and holy things, and
in the same measure attached to the world and worldly things, with the
result that sin and passion are more easily and more deeply rooted in
them. If young people come with the excuse that they were obliged to
work on Sunday, and therefore were not able to be present at Mass, the
confessor must investigate the validity of this excuse and give the
necessary directions and instructions. He should not be overready to
admit its validity; in towns especially, by a little good will and zeal,
though at cost of some effort, Mass may be heard before work begins.
These same people will often deprive themselves of necessary rest when it
is a question of pleasure! Work on Sundays is not always inevitable and
absolutely necessary, and other situations are to be found in which it is
not demanded. The confessor must inquire into all this.
2. Great esteem for holy purity and a great horror of impurity. For this
purpose the confessor should encourage (_a_) the reading of good books,
warn his penitents against idleness, and instill in them a love of virtue
(§ 66, IV). He should also (_b_) caution them against sinful talk and
familiar intercourse with persons of the opposite sex, and against bad
company; this warning should be especially addressed to young women,
who should also be admonished to be decent and modest, as becomes
virtuous women, at all times and in all places—at work, at recreation,
in the house, out of the house, in dress, and in manners; (_c_) he
should endeavor, to the best of his ability, to keep them from dangerous
pleasures, especially from theaters, dances, shows (§ 66, II. III), and
certain pleasure trips, which, unfortunately, in our days are so general,
and for which so many opportunities are afforded; indeed, he will be
obliged to forbid many of them to certain penitents as they are for these
penitents _occasio proxima relativa_; (_d_) he should also seek to hinder
young men from joining certain societies, the principal object of which
is pleasure, and which so often give occasion for profanation of Sundays
and holidays and for other scandals, and in which the ruling spirit is
not one favorable to religion and virtue. On the other hand, he should
recommend them, and young women also, to join a well-conducted religious
society or sodality; (_e_) he should induce them confidently to unfold
to their confessors all their temptations, struggles, and difficulties;
(_f_) finally, he should recommend and urge frequent reception of the
holy Sacraments after careful preparation and an earnest endeavor to
sanctify the day of communion.
But only the _regular confessor_ can, in this prescribed manner, produce
permanent effect upon young men and women. Only he who has known and
guided his penitent a long time can effectively warn him against
threatening dangers; and when the latter has gone astray, a confessor
can easily lead him back, and preserve him from future dangers and
relapse. It is, therefore, of the greatest importance that young people
should not change their confessors without a good reason. They should be
advised to choose a regular confessor and to give him their confidence,
ready to submit with docility to his admonitions and precepts. But if
his penitents confess once or twice to another priest, the permanent
confessor must by no means express displeasure or irritation; under
certain circumstances he must even express satisfaction at it, for it
is better that they should confess sincerely to another priest than
sacrilegiously to him. When they return to him he should show even
greater love and concern for them, and resume their guidance with the
accustomed conscientiousness. The priest to whom these penitents come
without the knowledge of their former confessor must receive them kindly,
dispose them, if necessary, and induce them to be sincere after they
return to the former confessor.
The confessor must devote special attention to a vice with which so many
young people are infected—the _vitium pollutionis_—in order to preserve
those who are still untainted by this pest, and to deliver and cure those
who are its victims. In a former section (§ 69, II) we have said what was
necessary on this point, and enumerated the remedies which the confessor
must apply to these unfortunate penitents.[953] If the young penitents
(male or female) are inmates of an educational establishment, the
confessor must not overlook the possibility of _particular friendships_,
as these prove to be very injurious. At first they are merely matters
of fanciful preference, without harm. But later on such friends like
to separate themselves from others when they are able to do so, and by
degrees the relationship between them tends toward sensuality and to
sins against purity. This evil the confessor must judiciously endeavor
to avert; if he observes such friendships, he must demand that they be
broken off, if necessary, under threat of refusing absolution. And if
one of the parties continues to be a cause of temptation, he must be
denounced to the Superior if this is possible. The confessor may be
assured that only by legitimate severity will anything be accomplished in
this matter.[954]
76. The Confessor as Adviser in the Choice of a State of Life.
It will often happen that the confessor is in a position to help young
people in the choice of a state of life; we will, therefore, lay down a
few rules on the point.
1. The confessor is by his calling an adviser to his penitents in this
matter; for he knows the souls of his penitents, their inclinations,
faults, and weaknesses, and the duties of the different states of life.
He is likewise apt to receive a special illumination of divine grace in
the exercise of his office, and he is probably always the most impartial
of those concerned in the decision of this question. Hence the penitent
usually lays this question of his future before his confessor with the
greatest confidence.
2. The right choice of a vocation is of supreme importance for a young
man or young woman; upon it depend not only the temporal and eternal
welfare of the party in question, but also the happiness and unhappiness
of many others. The confessor ought, therefore, to expend very much care
upon this question; he must consider, investigate, pray, and admonish the
penitent to do the same. The decision of such a weighty matter should
never be hasty. _Noli præcipitanter agere; diu considera, magnum est,
quod proponis_, writes St. Bernard.[955] The confessor must inquire
into the abilities of the young man or woman, the moral condition, and
also the exterior circumstances of the person; he must consider the
question of means and foresee difficulties which may arise. He must then
investigate if the intentions of the person in entering upon this state
are pure and acceptable to God. Finally, he must have recourse to God in
earnest prayer, that he may be able to give his penitent the right advice
in so important a matter. _Tria sunt difficilia mihi et quartum penitus
ignoro_, namely: _viam viri in adolescentia_ (Prov. xxx. 18, 19). St.
Philip Neri, the paternal friend and guide of youth, recommends in the
choice of a vocation, _time, prayer, and counsel_.
3. The confessor should not seek to persuade young people to embrace
some particular calling: “_Circa statum ab aliquo adolescente eligendum
non audeat Confessarius illum ei determinare, sed tantum ex indiciis
curet suadere statum illum, ad quem prudenter judicare potest ipsum a
Deo vocari_,” is the admonition of St. Alphonsus to confessors.[956] The
confessor should, therefore, direct the young man to submit the matter
to Almighty God, who determines the station in life of every individual,
and teach him that each one must seek to know the will of God, and be
ready to follow the divine call, whatever it may be, for a man can be
permanently and truly happy only in that state which God has allotted
him. He should admonish him to implore with perseverance light from on
high, and to this end perform some special devotion—a novena to Our Lady
of Good Counsel, or to St. Aloysius, the patron of youth, or to St.
Joseph; to receive the holy Sacraments, and preserve himself from all
grave sin, so as to place no obstacle in the way of the divine light of
grace.
All this being done, the confessor can, trusting to the grace of God,
give an answer which shall be, if possible, decisive. God is wont to make
known to a man the station destined for him in a threefold manner: (_a_)
_by miracles_, as He did in the case of St. John the Baptist, St. Paul,
and many other saints; (_b_) by interior illumination and suggestion,
by means of which the individual is enabled to recognize the will of
God clearly, as we see illustrated in the lives of very many saints in
quite a remarkable manner; (_c_) and generally, by means of outward
circumstances, by pronounced inclination and special capacity for some
state of life; among these circumstances may be reckoned the exterior
providential guidance of men, which the world calls chance, but which the
Christian enlightened by faith recognizes as the providence of God.
Respecting individual callings, the confessor should observe the
following:—
I. Religious Orders.
If a young man or woman shows an inclination to enter a Religious Order
and consults the confessor about the matter, the latter should first
investigate if the penitent has the ordinary abilities for such a life,
if he has sound judgment and a good character, if he is disposed to
obedience, if he possesses relatively sufficient talent and knowledge,
and if he is healthy. For one who is not of sound judgment is subject
to many hallucinations, and St. Teresa used to say, very wisely, that
she did not wish to have either scrupulous or melancholy persons in her
Order, that is, such as were subject to these faults in a considerable
degree, because such persons are a cause of much trouble both to
themselves and the community. Those who have not good health will not
be able to observe the general regulations of the establishment, and,
therefore, will be more of a burden than a benefit to the community,
and will not be able to set a good example. The priest should then
test the penitent’s intention in entering the Order, to see if it is
the right one, namely, to unite himself more intimately and closely to
God, to atone for the errors and sins of his former life, and to avoid
the dangers of the world. If the confessor should discover that the
intention has been influenced by some such motive as the expectation
of leading a life free from cares, or of escaping from the tutelage of
harsh relations, or by desire of complying with the wishes of parents,
he should proceed cautiously, for under the circumstances it may be
suspected that there is no vocation.[957] If, however, the intention
is right, and there is no obstacle in the way, the confessor may not,
and cannot, under grave sin,[958] prevent or dissuade the person from
following his vocation; nor may any one else do so. The confessor must
also investigate if _the purpose_ of the individual in question _is
firm and steadfast_; in order to make sure of this, it is sometimes
advisable to defer for a time the execution of the intention, especially
if the confessor knows the young person to be rather fickle, or when the
resolution to enter the Order was taken during a Mission, or under the
influence of a Retreat, because resolutions are sometimes made on such
occasions, which, when the first zeal has cooled down, are not kept.[959]
The confessor must be especially careful with penitents who, on account
of frequent relapses into sins of impurity, give rise to the suspicion
that they do not lead chaste lives; and also with those who have reached
middle age, because it is to be presumed that, being settled in their
habits and views, they would find obedience too difficult; finally, he
should also be extremely careful with those who have already belonged to
an Order, because these do not generally persevere, or are not adapted to
a life in community.
When the confessor has satisfied himself, as far as possible, concerning
the vocation for a Religious Order, he will have no difficulty in
discovering to what Order the young person is called. Here he must pay
special attention to the inclinations and dispositions of the candidate,
and whether regular observance prevails in the Order under consideration.
But as long as the question of the calling is not quite decided, he must
insist: (1) that the person maintain silence with every one, even his
parents, concerning it, till it is recognized as his vocation, and is
to be carried out; (2) that he should persevere in prayer for guidance,
and frequently receive the holy Sacraments; (3) that he should shun the
distractions, pleasures, and vanities of the world, otherwise he will run
the risk of losing his vocation.
II. The priesthood.[960]
Holy Writ, both in the Old and New Testament, teaches that a vocation
from God (_vocatio divina_) is necessary for receiving Orders (_status
clericalis_). Our Savior Himself expressed this truth very clearly when
He said to the first priests of the New Law: “_Non vos me elegistis, sed
ego elegi vos_,” and His Apostle also, who writes: “_Nec quisquam sumit
sibi honorem, sed qui vocatur a Deo tanquam Aaron_” (Heb. v. 4). The
confessor must, therefore, carefully examine the candidate’s vocation to
the priesthood; indeed, this investigation is even of greater importance
than in the case of the candidature for a Religious Order. For if the
religious takes upon himself greater burdens with regard to obedience
and voluntary poverty, and if the love of community life and a submissive
spirit is not to such a high degree necessary in the secular priest, yet
greater dangers threaten the latter, and fewer safeguards are at his
disposal than are possessed by the religious, who, in the rule of his
Order and the regular life of a monastery, finds a powerful help.[961]
The chief signs, by means of which the confessor may recognize a vocation
for the priesthood, are: (1) right intention—not seeking a comfortable
life, a future free from care, and honor in the eyes of the world, but
only the honor of God, and the salvation of souls; (2) a persistent
inclination to the spiritual state, joy in the spiritual life, and in
the offices of the priesthood; (3) confirmed virtue (“_virtus probata_,”
or _probitas vitæ, positiva nempe, iis virtutibus subnixa, quæ dignum
efficiant altaris ministrum_); especially purity of heart, temperance,
piety, modesty, and zeal;[962] (4) ability to perform the duties of this
station. As, in our days, nearly all who enter the clerical state wish
to become priests also, and by far the greater number of priests have
_cura animarum_, this ability consists in an average mental endowment
and the necessary knowledge, joined to a love of ecclesiastical science,
in prudent judgment and right conscience (very scrupulous youths are
unsuitable). According to the teaching of St. Alphonsus, one who intrudes
himself into the priestly office without a vocation cannot be acquitted
of great presumption, as he exposes himself to the great danger of losing
his own soul and of giving scandal to the faithful. He will, therefore,
not be free from grave sin.[963] But it sometimes happens that those who
were certain of their vocation become doubtful and vacillate; temptations
of the evil one arise and cause confusion; friends and relatives exert
their influences in order to turn them from the spiritual state, joy in
worldly pleasures and diversions makes itself felt; they fear and shrink
from the duties of the office, thinking they will not be able to perform
them, or they believe themselves unworthy to enter such a holy state.
If a confessor finds a penitent tempted in this manner, he must try to
inspire him with courage and confidence, make him understand that every
state in life has its burdens, but that in none is the yoke lighter than
in the one assigned by God. He should point out to him the deceits with
which the enemy of all good and the “father of lies” so often confuses
souls; remind him of the teaching of Jesus, that the kingdom of heaven
suffereth violence and that only the violent carry it away, that he who
will follow Jesus must take up his cross and carry it daily. At the same
time he must recommend prayer and absolute submission to the will of God.
III. The state of virginity (_status virginitatis in sæculo_).
If a woman living in the world has a serious wish to preserve virginal
purity, the confessor must confirm and support her in so good and
salutary a resolution, for it is very pleasing to Jesus, the lover of
pure souls. It offers a safer and easier way to holiness, and the state
of virginity by far exceeds in merit and dignity that of matrimony. The
confessor should, however, only allow those to take the vow of _perpetual
virginity_ whom he knows to be truly steadfast in piety and virtue, and
of firm and decided will. As a rule, he should allow younger persons to
take this vow for a short time only at first,—say for six months,—and
afterwards, when they have proved themselves steadfast, and he sees
that it is beneficial to them, he can extend the period to one or two
years, and only later permit them to bind themselves by vow to perpetual
virginity; or he should permit the perpetual vow under a conditional
resolution, such as: “_nisi Confessarius pro tempore judicaverit
expedire, ut votum desinat_.”[964]
The confessor should give special attention to those penitents who have
really taken the vow of virginity, instructing them not only to be
faithful to their vow, but to lead a perfect life according to their
station and capacity.
IV. The state of _matrimony_.
Although the state of virginity possesses a very exalted dignity, the
state of matrimony has divine sanction. The Church has always esteemed it
highly, faithfully following in this respect the example of her divine
Founder, and has always defended the dignity of Christian marriage
wherever it was called for. God has ordained marriage for most men as
their state of life; and, since upon the faithful performance of the
duties of married people depend, not only their own temporal and eternal
welfare, but also that of the family and of society, let the confessor,
when occasion is offered: (1) direct his endeavors to prevent young
people from entering into the state of matrimony too soon, without
preparation, without knowledge of its duties, or capacity to perform
them, and with an impure motive; (2) oppose most energetically those
forbidden and pernicious intimacies which are the worst imaginable
preparation for marriage, and generally the occasion of grave sins,
and tolerate only the acknowledged and necessary intimacies a short
time before the marriage, with due observance of the necessary measures
of precaution; (3) instruct those penitents who have a vocation for
marriage, and wish to enter that state, concerning its duties;[965] (4)
admonish them to inform their parents of their intention to marry, in
order to obtain their advice and assistance. For, as on the one hand,
parents would sin who deterred their children, _sine justa causa_, from
contracting an honorable marriage, so, on the other hand, children would
sin who wished, against the will of their parents, to contract a marriage
calculated to bring shame and dishonor upon a family, without some valid
ground which would constitute an excuse for so doing.[966]
77. Betrothal and Marriage.
“_Maxima prudentia ac zelo hic opus habet Confessarius_,” justly remarks
Scavini, and continues (quoting the “Méthode pour la direction des
ames”), “Les personnes, qui vont se marier ont besoin de plusieurs avis
pour ne rien omettre de leurs devoirs, ne rien faire contre la sainteté
du mariage.” The confessor should particularly observe the following
points: 1. Betrothed persons should not, as a rule, live in the same
house.[967] Let the confessor insist with unrelenting severity in this
matter.[968]
2. The time of betrothal should be one of preparation for contracting a
marriage well pleasing to God; but it would be a very bad preparation
on the part of the betrothed persons to burden their souls with grave
sins against holy purity. Let the confessor, therefore, admonish them
to preserve themselves free from all sins during this time, especially
from those of impurity; and he has the more reason for giving this
advice because very great dangers threaten their virtue on account of
the intimacy of their relationship, the frequency of their intercourse,
and their mutual inclination; moreover, this time of betrothal is, often
enough, a career of continued sin, and an almost uninterrupted round of
distractions, pleasures, and worldly cares. It often happens that young
women, who before their betrothal led a zealous, religious, and pure
life, become during this time lukewarm and indifferent in the exercises
of piety, in the reception of the holy Sacraments, and even in attendance
at Mass. With this comes carelessness in combating temptation; and moral
perversion, alas! often of the worst kind is the result. Therefore let
the confessor watch, warn, and admonish.
(_a_) He should explain to them that whatever is forbidden by God in the
sixth and ninth commandments is no more allowed to them than to unmarried
people in general; on the contrary, the prospect of a speedy union, their
mutual love and weakness may lead them into greater temptations and
dangers, and that they should, therefore, be more watchful and careful
now, should pray more than before for the necessary grace and strength
to remain pure, and to be able to approach the altar for the nuptial
ceremony with hearts undefiled. He should also call their attention to
the misfortunes in married life with which God, even here on earth, is
wont to punish sins committed against the sanctity of the Sacrament by
the betrothed.
(_b_) He should forbid them any too familiar intercourse with each
other, especially _solius cum sola_, in retired places at night or in
the evening. He must not allow them to meet without some attendance
and supervision. How many have been exposed to the greatest dangers by
merely going to the door in the evening, and tainted a virtue which
had been preserved spotless for years. Frequent visiting of engaged
persons without supervision of parents or relations is, in general, to
be regarded and treated as an _immediate_ occasion of sin, and that,
not _per accidens_, but _per se_.[969] St. Alphonsus inveighs severely
against engaged persons and the parents who permit these visits and
familiarities, and defends his severity by appealing to experience.[970]
Moralists teach (and experience confirms their teaching) that too much
familiarity on the part of persons engaged constitutes the very greatest
danger to chastity.[971] Frassinetti’s words are to the point: “Let
parents see that their sons do not meet with too great familiarity, and,
above all, not alone and without witnesses, the young women whom they
think of marrying. I say ‘with too great familiarity,’ for it would be
useless to preach that betrothed persons should never visit one another.
Such visits are partly necessary, in order that there may be mutual
knowledge of one another, before they are joined by the indissoluble
bond of matrimony. Moreover, they would, in any case, wish to visit one
another, on account of their mutual attachment, which, in view of their
future marriage, is not reprehensible.... But the priest must earnestly
impress upon parents the necessity of exercising great watchfulness over
these visits. _Great watchfulness_, in order that the young people may
observe the strictest propriety in their intercourse with each other.
The parents should, therefore, always have them under their observation.
Such visiting should not be prolonged nor be too frequent. For, in these
cases, it cannot be presumed that divine grace will assist the young
people, as such conduct is neither necessary nor becoming; and, on this
account, there will unfailingly be many dangers.”
(_c_) He should urge speedy marriages, as this will obviate many
temptations and dangers of sin. Protracted engagements are seldom good;
circumstances may supervene which make speedy marriage difficult or
impossible; but if it can take place soon, the confessor must not easily
consent to postponement from slight motives.[972] The cause of the
postponement should be inquired into, and all possible efforts be made
to remove it. Every betrothed person _can_ demand the fulfilment of the
promise of marriage (even in _foro externo_) and the other party is,
_sub gravi_, bound to accede to this demand if he has no valid reason
for refusal or postponement. As postponement of marriage generally
means great moral dangers for the betrothed, it can only be justified
by weighty motives.[973] If one of the parties intends to dissolve the
engagement, the confessor should explain its binding nature. To break off
an engagement out of levity, in momentary anger or on account of some
sudden passion, is wrong, and dishonorable, even if the dissolution be
valid.[974] To make engagements lightly and as lightly to break them is
contrary to the sanctity of matrimony.
(_d_) He should enjoin zealous prayer, frequent reception of the
Sacraments,[975] and especially a general confession (which will be
useful for all and necessary for many)[976] and good works, that they
may receive the Sacrament of Matrimony worthily, thus laying a solid
foundation for a happy life. But it is not well to defer the confession
till the last hours or minutes before the wedding, and the confessor
should energetically dissuade from this practice, which may cause him
and those about to be married difficulties and embarrassment. In order
to avoid this, and also to contribute to a better preparation, he should
recommend confession (general confession) _before or after the_ first
publication of the banns, and then confession again immediately before
the wedding.
For if the confession is not made till shortly before the wedding, the
following difficulties may arise: 1. _The penitent may not be disposed
or cannot be rendered disposed._ The confessor will certainly do
everything which zeal for souls and the light of grace suggest, in order
to dispose the penitent for the worthy reception of absolution. But if
the disposition remains doubtful, despite all his endeavors, he may
absolve the penitent _sub conditione_, as the reception of the Sacrament
of Matrimony is a sufficient reason for administering conditional
absolution.[977] If his efforts to dispose the penitent remain
fruitless,—the bridegroom, perhaps, being bad and wishing only to make a
show of receiving the holy Sacraments, influenced by his better disposed
bride, or by relations; or because he will not satisfy some necessary
condition, such as avoiding some immediate occasion, making restitution,
giving up an enmity,—the confessor must refuse absolution. Of course,
such a person may not receive holy communion, and the confessor must
tell him so. As to the reception of the Sacrament of Matrimony, there
are two possible cases to consider: either he does not know that a state
of grace is necessary for the lawful reception of this Sacrament, or he
does know it. If he does not know it, and if the confessor is obliged to
presume (knowing the penitent’s frame of mind) that he would not respect
his admonition concerning the unlawful reception of the Sacrament of
Matrimony in a state of mortal sin, he must leave him in his state of
ignorance and _bona fides_, in order that he may not formally sin. If
the penitent does know that it is not allowed to receive the Sacrament
of Matrimony in mortal sin, the confessor should lay before him in
forcible terms the enormity of the sacrilege of which he will be guilty,
in order, if possible, to bring him to a better disposition. And if this
is of no avail, he should admonish him with suitable prudence, to make an
act of perfect contrition before the marriage, and to come to confession
as soon as possible after it.[978]
2. Another difficulty arises when the penitent confesses a reserved sin
from which the confessor cannot absolve. As here _gravis causa confitendi
urget_, we are face to face with a case which was discussed earlier
in this work and solved by St. Alphonsus, namely, that any priest can
indirectly absolve from sins reserved to the bishop, and also from those
reserved to the Pope, _si episcopus non possit adiri_; even when the sin
is reserved _cum excommunicatione_.[979]
3. Finally, another difficulty may arise: the confessor may discover
in the confessional an _impedimentum matrim. occultum ex causa
infamante exortum_; the marriage for which all the preparations have
been made cannot be postponed without disgrace and great detriment to
the parties, and dispensation from the impediment cannot be obtained.
Here the following circumstances have to be taken into consideration:
(_a_) If both parties know the impediment, and have concealed it from
a bad motive, they must, if possible, postpone their marriage till the
dispensation has been obtained. If they are not willing to do this,
the confessor must refuse them absolution. But if they are not able
to postpone the marriage on account of the great disgrace or scandal
which would result, and if they are otherwise in good dispositions, he
can give them absolution; but he must instruct them that they have to
be married before the priest, on the supposition that the Pope will
dispense, then to live merely as brother and sister till the dispensation
has been obtained;[980] after that they must repeat before him their
consent to marry. He must tell them how this has to be done, make it
as easy for them as possible, so as not to deter them. (_b_) If both
parties are ignorant of the impediment, and are quite _bona fide_ and
if the confessor cannot assume that they will live continently till the
dispensation is procured, he should leave them in their ignorance, _bona
fide_, and request a dispensation _pro foro interno_, then proceeding
according to the rules for rendering valid an invalid marriage _in foro
interno_; for it is better to let them commit material sins, than to
furnish them with occasion for formal sins. (_c_) If only one of the
two parties is aware of the obstacle, and, on account of the disgrace
attaching to it, cannot reveal it to the other, a “_communissima et
probabilissima sententia_” of the theologians teaches that the bishop can
grant a dispensation in this case,[981] and recourse must, therefore,
be had to him. If the latter is not possible, the confessor (or parish
priest) can, according to what St. Alphonsus calls the “not unfounded”
teaching of many theologians, declare “_ex Epikeia_” that the _lex
impedimenti_ does not bind in this case, because it would be injurious.
But the confessor must _pro securitate et ad salvandam reverentiam
legibus Ecclesiæ debitam, quantocius_ apply to the Roman Penitentiary,
or to the Ordinary who possesses the quinquennial faculties, in order to
obtain a dispensation. But it is to be carefully observed that only a
secret impediment, arising from a sin, is here in question; for in the
case of a public impediment arising from no dishonorable cause, there is
neither scandal nor disgrace, but only the inconvenience of postponing
the marriage.[982] It depends entirely upon circumstances, since it is
the duty of the pastor to instruct those about to marry, whether the
confessor should give special suggestions and admonition in this last
confession on the _usus matrimonii_,[983] explaining what is allowed
to married people, and what is forbidden.[984] He may speak to them of
the intention which, as Christians, they should have in this state;
of matrimonial harmony and mutual love and fidelity. If the confessor
deems it necessary, or advisable and beneficial, he will not fail in
his zeal for souls to instruct his penitents concerning this matter,
and to admonish them to lead a truly Christian family life, where sin
and vice are carefully avoided, whilst God is being faithfully served.
If matrimony is based upon this foundation, the husband and wife may
confidently expect God’s abundant graces: if they depart from these
principles, they will deprive themselves of this blessing.[985]
78. The Confessor’s Attitude toward Mixed Marriages.
The confessor will often have occasion to speak to penitents concerning
mixed marriages, because they either wish to contract such a marriage,
or have already done so. The following principles will serve him in this
equally important and difficult matter.
I. Even if the essence of marriage is not destroyed by the obstacle of
mixed religion, as in _disparitas cultus_, it falls short of the ideal.
For marriage should not only represent the unity of the Church; it
should, as much as is possible, produce this unity; now the Church is,
in a special manner, _one_ through its faith. Conscious of this, and in
view of the many great disadvantages which accrue from mixed marriages,
the Church has always energetically protested against them. She has
always taught that such a marriage is a reprehensible _communicatio in
sacris_, that there is danger to the Catholic party of falling away
from religion or of becoming indifferent to it, and that a proper
education in the Catholic faith of children born from such marriage, if
not exactly impossible, is certainly rendered very difficult, as the
necessary coöperation is wanting, and opposition easily made by word and
example.[986] In 1858 the Apostolic See anew admonished the bishops to
deter the faithful from such mixed marriages.
Only by three conditions will the dangers of mixed marriages be, if not
removed, at least reduced; and only under these three conditions does the
Church, _præsertim ob privatas causas_, permit mixed marriages. These
conditions are: (1) Both parties, especially the non-Catholic, must
promise, ordinarily in writing and before witnesses, to bring up all
their children in the Catholic religion (without distinction of sex). (2)
The non-Catholic party must promise solemnly not to hinder in any way the
Catholic party in the practice of his (or her) religion. (3) The Catholic
must use every lawful means to effect the conversion of the heretical
partner.[987]
From these three conditions the Church cannot recede,[988] for, as
not only the ecclesiastical, but also the natural and the divine law,
absolutely forbid that anybody expose himself or his offspring to
the danger of perversion, it naturally results that these sureties
should be prescribed and demanded, in order that together with the
canonical precepts, the natural and divine law may not be criminally
transgressed.[989] When these conditions are satisfied, and officially
guaranteed[990] by a contract, dispensation from the _impedimentum mixtæ
religionis_ may then be requested from the bishop, and given by him in
virtue of the usual faculties conferred upon him.
II. By these regulations of the Church, his _modus procedendi_ in the
matter of a mixed marriage is mapped out for the priest or the confessor.
1. If the confessor receives information of an intended mixed marriage,
he should emphatically dissuade from it, but with pastoral prudence, and
without offensive words.
2. If his endeavors are of no avail, and if he cannot prevent the
marriage, he must persuade the penitent to fulfill the stipulated
conditions.
3. If the penitent agrees to this, the confessor will do well not to
administer absolution at once unless there is some special reason for
so doing (for example, the fulfilment of a commandment of the Church,
necessity of communicating, to prevent gossip, etc.), but let him urge
that the consent of the non-Catholic party to the three conditions should
first be obtained.
4. When this consent is obtained, there is no obstacle to the absolution
of the penitent.
5. But if the penitent will not consent to the fulfilment of the three
conditions, but still intends to contract the mixed marriage, he purposes
to commit a grave sin, and cannot be absolved. For he who, without
obtaining a dispensation from the _impedimentum mixtæ religionis_,
contracts a mixed marriage before a non-Catholic minister, is guilty of
three grave sins: he disobeys the Church; he endangers the salvation of
the children which God may give him; he is _hæreseos fautor_, guilty of a
_communicatio in sacris_, and incurs ecclesiastical censure.[991]
III. Concerning the reconciliation of those persons who, in disobedience
to their Church, have contracted a mixed marriage before a non-Catholic
minister, the confessor must be guided by the following principles:—
1. It is certain that a Catholic having contracted marriage before a
Protestant clergyman cannot be absolved as long as he remains unwilling
to make good the above-mentioned conditions. Even if the refusal of
absolution does not produce its immediate effect (the fire of passion
obscuring the light of conscience), it, nevertheless, instills salutary
fear. But it would be very wrong on the part of the confessor to wound
such a penitent by harshness and reproaches. The confessor (parish
priest) must take all pains to bring such penitents to a consciousness of
their error.[992]
2. But if the penitent truly repents of his error, and if he is ready to
make good the scandal given, and to take immediate steps towards bringing
up his children as Catholics, he is worthy of absolution and it may not
be refused to him.
3. It is, above all, necessary to find out if the marriage was valid
according to the Decree _Tametsi_. If the marriage has been invalidly
contracted, a dispensation from the _impedimentum mixtæ religionis_ and
from the banns is to be sought; and when this is obtained, according to
the regulations of the Church, the consent is to be renewed. If this
renewal of consent cannot be effected, _sanatio in radice_ must be
requested.[993] If the marriage is valid, dispensation is not necessary.
4. Moreover, the _facultas absolvendi a censuris propter hæresim_ must
be obtained. For the censure reserved _speciali modo_ to the Pope is,
according to an explicit decision of Rome, incurred in _all cases_ by
those _qui matrimonium coram ministro hæretico ineunt_; even when the
existence of censure was not known to the parties, because it is a
question of the _forum externum_, and the contract of marriage is, of
its nature, an external act. By virtue, however, of the quinquennial
faculties, the bishop can absolve from this censure, or confer this power
_subdelegando_ upon others. The confessor must, therefore, refer the
penitent to the parish priest, in order that the latter may procure from
the bishop the _facultas absolvendi a censuris pro foro externo_. Not
till then can the confessor give sacramental absolution.
Only when, from _special reasons_, determined by the circumstances, an
_absolutio in foro externo_ would not be advisable, may the confessor
apply for the _facultas absolvendi a censuris pro foro interno_, and
administer this absolution after he has obtained the faculty. We add that
absolution from the censure _in foro externo_ can take place without
witnesses, and that it is not necessary to make use of definite words at
the absolution _in utroque foro_, but it is always necessary to declare
that the absolution is administered by virtue of special powers from the
Holy See, subdelegated by the bishop.
Married people who were allowed to receive the Sacraments before the
promulgation of the answer of the Holy Office, 18 May, 1892, requiring
the _absolutio a censuris pro foro externo_, are not to be disturbed.
5. The confessor should also help a penitent of this kind to keep his
resolution of bringing up his children as Catholics, by showing him
what steps he must take. He should encourage him to overcome possible
difficulties which may occur. This will be easier for the Catholic father
than the mother. If the children have reached an age when they are
removed from parental authority, the Catholic party must at least promise
to exert its influence by prayer, exhortation and good example, to gain
the children for the Catholic Church.[994]
Of course the confessor must demand that the penitent should inform his
parish priest of his resolution to bring up the children in the Catholic
faith. Only very weighty grounds should induce the confessor to refrain
from exacting this, and then he would be obliged to apply to his Ordinary
for advice.
6. It may also be the case that a woman repents of the step which she
took, but which she cannot now retrace, not being able, in spite of her
good will, to induce her husband to consent to the Catholic education of
the children. It would be hard, in such a case, to leave her unassisted.
The repentance which she has evidenced, the willingness which she has
shown (and which will continue) to repair as far as possible the harm
done; the efforts which she may have already made; the promise to
influence husband and children by the means at her disposal—prayer,
a good life, words of advice—suffice for her to be admitted to the
Sacraments. This satisfies the demands which the Holy Office in Rome
makes in such cases.[995]
7. If the confessor believes that there is reason for doubting the
sincere and earnest will of penitents who are joined by an illicit mixed
marriage, he is free to make inquiry, and, according to the nature of
the case, to postpone absolution for a time. It is always well not to
admit such penitents to the holy Sacraments shortly after contracting
the illicit marriage, unless they have guaranteed the Catholic education
of their children in a manner which satisfies the ecclesiastical
regulations; unless, moreover, they show sorrow for their lapse from
duty, and by faithful performance of their religious obligations,
effectually prove that they wish to be obedient to the Catholic Church
in future. Persons who are dangerously ill, emigrants, etc., of course,
constitute exceptions to this rule.
8. An illicit marriage contracted by a Catholic before a non-Catholic
minister is a public act and causes public scandal; the satisfaction
must, therefore, as a rule, be made publicly. The confessor must not
overlook this, lest he make himself an accomplice in the scandal, and
lest this dreadful evil of our days (for such mixed marriages are in
reality, especially when contracted without dispense) be rendered more
numerous, by want of due severity in the conditions of reconciliation. As
public acts of reparation may be regarded: an oral or written declaration
of sorrow before the parish priest; the promise of bringing up their
children as Catholics made to the pastor. The confessor should follow the
directions which may have been given by his bishop in this matter, and if
there are none, he must proceed with pastoral prudence and charity. It
may happen that, in the place where the Sacraments are to be received,
the scandal given is not known, the parties having changed their place
of residence. In this case the reconciliation may take place in all
privacy. The confessor should not forget in such cases that the salvation
of souls is the highest law.
79. How to deal with Penitents joined in “Civil” Marriage only.
The confessor’s treatment of _penitents living in “civil” matrimony_ must
be essentially different from the above.
Here the chief question is whether there is a real _consensus maritalis_;
that is, whether the persons in question had the consciousness and
intention of entering upon a true matrimonial relationship by the
declaration which they made before the public official, or if they
believed they were concluding an external agreement only and one not
permanently binding upon the conscience. In the second place, the
confessor must investigate if there are any—and what—impediments to
marriage. If there are no diriment impediments, and if there was
a true _consensus maritalis_ in those places where the Tridentine
Decree “_Tametsi_” is not in force (therefore, where the _impedimentum
clandestinitatis_ does not apply), such informal contract of marriage
must be regarded as valid. On the other hand, these informal marriages
are ecclesiastically invalid in all places where the Tridentine Decree
is in force, on account of the “_impedimentum clandestinitatis_.” The
confessor must, however, in every individual case have recourse to the
Ordinary.
Apart from this question of validity, all persons living in mere “civil”
matrimony must be exhorted (if no obstacle from which there is no
dispensation be in the way) to be married in _forma Tridentina_, and to
receive the blessing of the Church. If difficulties arise in connection
with this, the confessor should apply to the bishop, in order to obtain
_sanatio in radice_, according to the circumstances.
A penitent living in “civil” marriage is not to be absolved till he has
promised to be married in the Church and has actually made preparation
for this marriage. Under particular circumstances—if the persons live
apart—absolution can be given, even if the ceremony is postponed.
Admission to holy communion must be deferred till immediately before the
marriage.
80. The Confessor’s Conduct towards Women.
Occasion has already several times[996] presented itself for remarks
concerning the confessor’s conduct when hearing the confessions of
women. The importance of the subject demands for it special treatment.
Amongst penitents women probably form nearly always the majority. However
regrettable it may be that men so seldom, and often reluctantly, approach
the tribunal of confession, it is a source of joy that women should be
zealous in the reception of the holy Sacraments, for this justifies the
hope that their influence upon their husbands and upon those around them
will be the more salutary. The influence which a truly Christian woman
exercises upon her husband, a mother upon her children, the mistress of
a house upon her subordinates, is very great. Truly Christian, pious,
and chaste young women are a real blessing in a family and a household.
Moreover, woman is generally more inclined to the exercise of Christian
piety, and can thus, if properly treated and guided, attain to great
perfection.
Nevertheless, it is not to be overlooked that, owing to certain
weaknesses and faults which are peculiar to their sex, the hopes of the
confessor are not infrequently disappointed and his endeavors rendered
fruitless. “Their piety may easily become a matter of feeling, without
solidity and worth; they are much inclined to form an inordinate
attachment for the confessor, which is perhaps not free from a sensual
element. The practice of piety also easily serves as a means of
gratifying vanity. Many are disposed to dissimulation and hypocrisy.”[997]
Hearing the confessions of women is thus indisputably one of the greatest
and most imminent dangers for the confessor. He must, therefore, be very
circumspect and prudent, reasonably fear this danger, for in this fear
lies his safety; “he who fears this rock runs no danger of suffering
shipwreck.”[998] These shortcomings ought not to mislead us into
condemning the whole sex, as is sometimes wrongly done. This is unjust.
We must help them to overcome their faults, and if no improvement results
from our endeavors, suitable severity is to be employed.
Bearing in mind the exhortation (Eccl. lxi. 15): “_Curam habe de bono
nomine_,” the circumspect and prudent confessor will have regard for his
good name, and seek to preserve and guard it; not only remaining pure
of heart, but preserving himself free from every suspicion of impurity,
herein faithfully following the example of Our Lord, who patiently bore
many an accusation leveled against Him, but never tolerated any on the
subject of purity. For nothing detracts so much from a priest’s authority
and efficiency as the suspicion that he is not absolutely clean of
heart. Let the confessor, therefore, place a guard upon his eyes, let
him never look at those who stand before his confessional, and never
glance at the face of the person whose confession he hears; he should
not try to find out who his female penitents are; it is sufficient for
him to know the state of their souls. He should carefully avoid, as far
as it is possible, all intercourse with them outside the confessional,
not visiting them in their houses, except at times of severe illness;
he should refuse _munuscula_ under whatever name they may be offered to
him; he should confide no secrets to them, and avoid familiarity.[999]
His words should be reserved, serious, respectful, even if the
penitent’s station and circumstances do not actually command respect.
When the priest hears the confessions of young women, and such as are
distinguished by station, beauty, education, etc., he must still more
carefully avoid familiarity. Concerning delicate matters the confessor
should put only few questions, and then only with the greatest prudence,
and content himself with knowing the nature of the sin, or its kind; he
should carefully guard against inquiring after superfluous details.[1000]
The confessor must not lose sight of the dictates of prudence which
have been discussed, when he hears the confessions of “_personæ
spirituales_.” Here, as St. Alphonsus warns us,[1001] prudence is
most necessary, on account of the _periculum majoris adhæsionis_. His
teaching on this point is as follows: “_Dicebat Ven. P. Sertorius
Capotus, diabolum ad conjungendas inter se personas spirituales, ab
initio uti prætextu virtutis, ut deinde affectus a virtute transeat ad
personam_,” and justifies this statement by a word of St. Augustine,
which St. Thomas quotes (Opusc. 64 de Famil. Dom. etc.): “Speech with
these persons must be short and reserved; it is not because they are
more holy that one must be more on his guard, but because the holier
they are, the more attractive they become.” And St. Thomas adds to
these significant words of the holy Bishop of Hippo: “_Licet carnalis
affectio sit omnibus periculosa ipsis tamen magis perniciosa, quando
conversantur cum persona, quæ spiritualis videtur; nam quamvis principium
videatur purum, tamen frequens familiaritas domesticum est periculum;
quæ quidem familiaritas quanto plus crescit, infirmatur principale
motivum et puritas maculatur._” He also adds that such persons do not
observe this at once, _quoniam diabolus ab initio non emittit sagittas
venenatas, sed illas tantummodo, quæ aliquantulum feriunt et augent
affectum. Sed brevi hujusmodi personæ eo deveniunt, ut non amplius agant
secum tanquam angeli, quemadmodum cœperant, sed tanquam carne vestiti;
vicissim se intuentur mentesque sibi feriunt blandis allocutionibus,
quæ adhuc a prima devotione videntur procedere: hinc alter alterius
præsentiam incipit appetere; sicque spiritualis devotio convertitur
in carnalem. Et quidem oh quot sacerdotes, qui antea erant innocentes
ob similes adhæsiones, quæ spiritu cœperant, Deum simul et spiritum
perdiderunt_.[1002]
In order to act with the necessary prudence, the confessor will (1) hear
the confessions of women, as far as possible, only in the Church, or in
some place which is always accessible for hearing confessions; (2) he
will dispatch matters, especially with those who often confess; will not
tolerate talk about subjects which do not belong to the confession, and
will carefully avoid long exhortations and unnecessary questions.
The confessor must observe all this, and take all precautionary
measures,—if he is young, because it is then particularly necessary, but
also in more advanced years, and even in old age, in order to give others
good example, and also because experience shows that even for those who
are mature and old, the danger exists, though it be lessened. “If the
confessor follows these precepts, he realizes in himself a miracle,
which is one of the most beautiful proofs of the truth of the Catholic
religion; the miracle, namely, that priests who preserve their hearts in
the holy fear of God, hear the confessions of women for years without
ever having to accuse themselves that their holy office has been for them
an occasion of sin, even of one single sin.”[1003]
If the penitents are _married women_, let the confessor encourage and
instruct them in the complete fulfilment of their duties towards their
husbands, above all, their duty of matrimonial love, giving a good
example, bearing faults with patience, and not ceasing, though their
husbands have gone astray, to use every endeavor to reform them,
especially by praying for them with indefatigable zeal. How many wives
have saved their husbands by their patience, their loving, prudent
exhortations, and their prayers.
If circumstances appear to call for it, let him admonish them to preserve
matrimonial chastity, and warn against transgressions, pointing out that
complete preservation of this matrimonial chastity is the very condition
and foundation of lasting matrimonial happiness, and of eternal salvation.
He should not permit pious women to devote themselves to the exercises
of piety, especially hearing Mass and frequent reception of the holy
Sacraments, to such an extent that important household duties are thereby
neglected, or members of the family aggrieved and irritated.
Finally, he must not be overready to believe complaints of wives about
their husbands; but if he finds that the complaints are justified, he
will tell the woman how to act and gravely comfort her. If she complains
of the severity and bad temper of her husband, he must advise her to
remain patient and obedient to him, to perform punctually every service
which he desires, to show her love for him by the greatest willingness
and kindness; to be silent when her husband is angry or intoxicated; not
to drive him to still greater violence even when she suffers injustice;
and admonish him affectionately when he has become calm, and sober, and
good-humored, but not till then. She should answer her angry husband with
meekness when she is _obliged_ to answer him, for a gentle answer turns
aside wrath, whereas a harsh one only embitters.
The _mother_ will claim the confessor’s special zeal; he should expose
to her the importance and responsibility of her duties, the obligation
of admonishing and instructing her children in prayer, in attendance at
Mass, reception of the holy Sacraments, and of correcting their faults;
of warning and protecting her children against the dangers which threaten
youth, of daily praying for them, of preventing dangerous intercourse
with other persons, of not allowing children of different sex to sleep
together, etc.
As so much depends upon the loyalty of _teachers, male and female_, to
their duties the confessor will not fail to admonish them at all times
to discharge faithfully these important and exalted duties, reminding
them of their grave responsibility. Teachers should zealously instruct
children in the truths of religion, always assisting the endeavors of
the priest according to their capacity, and working with him; see that
the education of the children is conducted upon Christian principles;
give the children and the parish good example by conscientious discharge
of their religious duties—attendance at Mass, reception of the holy
Sacraments, and by their conduct in general. They must be encouraged to
bear patiently the manifold, and by no means slight, hardships of their
position. The confessor will also show constant interest in their work in
the school.
The mistress of a house must be reminded by the confessor of the duties
of Christian employers—the duty especially of having a watchful eye
on the servants, not allowing them to go out late in the evening; of
preventing male and female servants being together at unseasonable times;
of treating servants in a Christian manner, and of giving them sufficient
time to fulfill their religious obligations.
81. The Confessions of Men.
It is a deplorable fact that men approach the confessional more seldom
than women, and especially since their position in life is more
influential, and consequently a high degree of piety is particularly
desirable in them, in order that this influence may be a salutary one. At
the same time, they are exposed to greater dangers and temptations.[1004]
1. Men must, therefore, be more welcome to the confessor as penitents
than women. St. Alphonsus bewails the fact that so many confessors spend
a good part of the day in hearing the confessions of certain pious
persons (_quas vulgo dicunt Bizocas_), and that when men or married
women, who are weighed down with misery and distress, and who at a great
sacrifice leave their homes and business, approach the confessional,
the priest dismisses them, saying: “Go to some other confessor, I have
too much to do”; and thus it comes to pass that such people live months
and years without the Sacraments. This is not hearing confessions to
please God, but rather to serve self-love. I know, and, in opposition
to others who maintain that the time is wasted which is devoted to the
confessions of these pious persons, I firmly hold that leading souls to
perfection is a work very pleasing to God; but I assert also that good
confessors who hear confessions only to please God (like St. Philip Neri,
St. John of the Cross, and St. Peter of Alcantara) do not hesitate to
prefer to these pious souls one whom they perceive to be in need of their
help.[1005] What St. Alphonsus says in another place is also undoubtedly
true, namely, that a perfect soul is more pleasing to God than a thousand
imperfect ones; but for them there are other times and other occasions,
and even leading souls to perfection does not demand such expenditure of
time and care that others should be neglected. Moreover, such a manner
of administering the Sacrament of Penance may easily give occasion to
malevolent misconstructions and rumors, and thus scandalize the men who
see themselves neglected.[1006] Hence men who come to confession must not
be kept waiting long. The confessor should show himself ready to answer
any call, even when the hour is unseasonable and troublesome to him.
If there are both men and women who wish to confess, Frassinetti[1007]
recommends hearing the men first; they generally have more important
business than women, and are also as a rule more impatient. Women have
more leisure and greater patience.
2. The confessor must always treat men courteously, “indeed with a
certain affability, as if he considered himself particularly fortunate,
and took a special pleasure in hearing their confessions.” Even if they
belong to the lowest classes and are coarse and repulsive, he should
always address them with politeness and kindness. “One can never show
them too much love and friendliness, for it makes the best impression
upon their minds, encourages them to make a good confession, and
in course of time incites them to a more frequent reception of the
Sacraments.”[1008]
3. The confessor must not speak of perfection to those who have no
understanding for it. He must generally be content with instilling into
their hearts hatred and detestation of mortal sin. “This is necessary,
lest they regard him as what they call a ‘saint,’ and be afraid to come
to him again.” But the confessor must not go too far in his indulgence,
nor permit to the men who are his penitents, anything which might become
a great danger for their souls; he must here be particularly careful
concerning circumstances in their lives which are to them _occasiones
proximæ_.
4. The confessor must urge them to fulfill their duties as Christian men
faithfully, punctually, and fervently.
5. He should especially warn them against negligence in prayer, admonish
them to observe Sundays and holy days conscientiously, and particularly
to be present at sermons, as those who seldom or never hear a sermon will
hardly persevere in a truly Christian life.
6. Then if it be opportune, he should enjoin moderation in drinking, in
case they have been guilty of drunkenness.
7. If he has reason to doubt the firmness and integrity of their faith,
in which they may be remiss, he must probe into the matter; perhaps he
will have to censure the reading of bad newspapers, or the frequenting of
doubtful society.
8. Upon husbands he should impress the duty of cultivating a loving and
peaceable disposition towards their wives, and, if there is reason for
it, the duty of avoiding all impropriety in married life. He should,
especially, denounce the evil habit of carrying on improper talk in the
presence of servants, companions, young people, and in the home circle.
9. Fathers should be earnestly admonished to assist their wives as much
as possible in the work of education, and to set their children a good
example in every respect.
82. The Confession of Nuns.[1009]
1. We have already stated that a priest requires special approbation
from the bishop to hear the confession of nuns.[1010] But in order
to discharge this office fruitfully, he must be well instructed and
experienced in spiritual things, prudent, and possessed of great charity
and patience. As already pointed out, proficiency in theology, especially
in moral theology, is indispensable to all confessors; “but greater
knowledge is necessary to the confessors of nuns, since the Church
exercises greater care in selecting them.” Without solid knowledge,
the unusual circumstances which may arise are often mismanaged and not
rarely with fatal results. The confessor of nuns must possess an accurate
knowledge of the spiritual and ascetic life, of the duties of religious
in general,[1011] and of the particular obligations of the Order (or
Congregation) to which the women committed to his care belong. First of
all, distinction is to be made between nuns who lead a contemplative and
those who lead an active life. The former are devoted in a special manner
to the love of God, are far removed from the dangers of the world, and
can more easily sanctify themselves; they also contribute toward the
general welfare by their prayers; but they are tried by temptations and
interior struggles. The others are not wholly withdrawn from the dangers
of the world, as they are inevitably brought into contact with it by the
exercise of the works of charity; society benefits much by their high
merits. Both forms of life are ordained by God, and are of great use in
the Church. Moreover, the separate Orders have their characteristics,
corresponding to the particular object for which they were founded. With
these, and with the constitutions of the Order, the confessor must be
familiar.
But in _rebus spiritualibus_ he must not only possess theoretical
knowledge, he must be _well experienced_ in them, “because _spiritualia_
cannot be rightly and perfectly understood without personal experience.”
If this experience is not possessed, he will be a blind man leading the
blind.[1012]
Supernatural love and patience are necessary to the confessor, in
order that he may zealously further the spiritual progress of those
committed to him, and bear with equanimity their faults, weaknesses,
and deficiencies. And though only a few souls may be confided to his
spiritual care, let him not forget that by the perfection of a few a
greater honor is shown to God than by the imperfect endeavors and virtues
of many. Let him also keep in mind that those who devote themselves to
the service of God have to endure more temptations of every kind than
others, and that he to whom the spiritual care of them is intrusted
must bear no small portion of this burden with them. If, therefore, the
confessor does not possess the supernatural love of God and his neighbor
which enables him to sustain these trials, he is not suited for his
office.
2. It must be his care that the nuns disclose to him the state of their
consciences with full confidence; they must place great trust in their
confessor, as he is almost their only refuge; and, like sheep without a
shepherd, they will be exposed to many anxieties and temptations if this
support fail them. He must, therefore, always show great patience and
gentleness towards all, and if he perceive in a nun a certain shyness in
the confessional which hinders her from making known her interior state,
he must lend her special assistance in laying aside this shyness; but at
the same time there is a certain kind of unnecessary tenderness which he
should avoid in his whole demeanor.
3. It must also be his care that nuns observe their vows faithfully and
perfectly, and adhere to the special rules and regulations of their
institute; moreover, that they perform their exercises of piety with
devotion and zeal, that their daily occupations are executed with a
perfect intention, with frequent recollection of the presence of God.
They must, therefore, be taught a good method of meditation and of the
examination of conscience (_examen generale_ and _particulare_), the
manner of receiving holy communion, making a good confession, hearing
holy Mass, saying the Office, and other vocal prayers. All these things
are generally provided, however, in the religious rule.
4. He must make it his concern that the nuns should advance in virtue.
The following virtues are especially necessary for them: (_a_) the love
of God, not a sensual love, but a strong love, one which urges to the
fulfilment of the will of God, in all things, even the most difficult;
(_b_) humility and modesty; (_c_) obedience to rules and to superiors; a
sacrificing, cheerful, punctual obedience, which does not ask a reason
for the command, but which, when no sin is apparent and certain, blindly
submits itself; (_d_) love of the members of the community, which has
for a practical result that they avoid wounding or grieving others,
that offenses are gladly forgiven, faults patiently borne, and mutual
assistance rendered, as far as is possible; (_e_) chastity, which avoids
every dangerous attachment and familiarity.
5. The confessor should encourage and promote the authority of the
Superioress of the convent, but not to such an extent that, if she should
happen to be in error or to go beyond her powers, he should render
himself inaccessible to the complaints of the subordinates; he should
discourage the spirit of grumbling in the community, because authority is
thereby weakened; but he should prudently weigh complaints which may be
laid before him, to see if they are justified, and so remedy them; others
he must dismiss.
6. In his capacity of confessor, he must observe the following points:
(_a_) to associate with the nuns rather too seldom than too often, and if
he is obliged to speak to them, let it be done as briefly as possible;
(_b_) in answering questions submitted to him, he should not be too
hasty, but in more important matters or cases of doubt, he should request
time for consideration; (_c_) in the confessional he should show no
weariness, no impatience, and no haste, for this lessens confidence in
him; (_d_) he must not be immoderately disturbed, nor take scandal if he
should hear a sin of greater gravity in the confessional, for he must
remember that persons dedicated to God are subject to violent attacks
from the evil one; let him, therefore, rather show pity than agitation,
admonish the erring one with paternal earnestness, encourage her,
reawaken her lost fervor, in order that by greater zeal and mortification
she may atone for her error and avoid sin in the future; (_e_) he should
be very careful to give no ground for any suspicion that he makes use of
knowledge gained in the confessional, in his actions or words outside
the confessional; (_f_) he must not interfere at all in the management
of the house, nor in any matter which concerns the Ordinary or the
Superioress, nor readily give advice in such things, but remain firmly
and strictly within the limits of his office, looking after the spiritual
welfare and the progress of his penitents. For this reason, he should
introduce no innovations, and if, on weighty grounds some change appears
desirable, it should not take place without the advice and consent of the
Superioress and the greater part of the community; otherwise peace in the
community will be destroyed.
7. The confessor must be especially on his guard against the following
abuses, lest they creep in, and establish themselves: (_a_) everything
which is detrimental to community life, or derogatory of the vow of
poverty in any way, even if only in slight measure; (_b_) disobedience
towards the Superioress, murmuring against her, complaining about her
to the other sisters, aversion, etc.; (_c_) offenses against charity,
even if these latter are common and not of grave nature; the confessor
must not tolerate the least offense against charity which is committed
with deliberation, and he must firmly insist upon reconciliation and
suppression of antipathies; (_d_) particular friendship, even if there
be no danger connected with it, is to be avoided, for it divides the
heart, hinders familiar intercourse with God, lessens the love of the
community, and gives occasion to complaints and recriminations; (_e_)
familiarity with, or voluntary intercourse with, persons not belonging to
the house; this causes great dangers, and weakens the religious spirit.
The confessor must, therefore, strictly insist upon the inclosure being
observed, and upon the portress being thoroughly trustworthy. If there
are nuns whose duties oblige them to be in contact with the world, or
who are occupied out of the house attending to the sick, the confessor
must see that danger of sin does not result to any one of them through
this occupation; (_f_) lukewarmness and spiritual sloth; the confessor
must direct his endeavors to prevent drooping of the first ardor, and to
encourage the practice of true piety; he should, therefore, insist that
the prescribed recollections take place regularly and are well observed;
also that there is a Retreat every year, or at least every two years.
8. In order that the Superioress may duly exercise her office, the
confessor should, when occasion offers, admonish her that: (_a_)
she must love all her sisters as her daughters without making any
distinction; and she must, therefore, gladly lend her ear to any one of
them, and help her to the best of her ability; (_b_) she must not at once
credit reports made secretly to her, but carefully investigate them, and
if she has to reprimand, it should generally be done privately; (_c_) she
must take care that the regular Observance is strictly fulfilled, and she
herself must be a model for all; (_d_) if she perceives abuses, she must
rectify them in a prudent manner; (_e_) she must look to it that members
of the Order who are sick are carefully tended and often visited by the
other sisters; (_f_) in the expenses she must avoid both avarice and
extravagance; (_g_) in admitting and dismissing novices she must exercise
great prudence; (_h_) in unusual circumstances she must have timely
recourse to the advice of the _Ordinarius_; (_i_) she must be guided
by the Papal Decree in the matter of the account of conscience. (The
constitutions of many Orders permitted the unfolding of the conscience to
the Superior, in order to obtain help and advice, but “a more intimate
investigation of the conscience, such as is reserved solely to the
Sacrament of Penance,” was wrongly introduced by some. In consequence
of which Pope Leo XIII strictly forbade Superioresses, whatever rank
and eminence they might occupy, to induce persons under them, directly
or indirectly, by command, advice, threats, or kind words, to make such
revelation of conscience to them. On the other hand, the Pope leaves it
to subordinates voluntarily and freely to disclose their interior state
to their Superiors, so that, in doubt and trouble of conscience, they may
receive from their wisdom advice and guidance);[1013] (_k_) finally, she
must never encroach on the rights of the regular confessor by determining
for individual sisters the number of weekly communions.[1014]
83. The Confession of Priests.
A good confessor is very necessary for a priest. The priest instructs,
warns, and guides others; he himself is seldom admonished and warned,
and yet for him, too, reproof, instruction, and warning are sometimes
necessary. And who should give it but his confessor? The latter has a
solemn duty to do so. And does not the priest, too, sometimes require
encouragement and comfort, especially if he finds himself in a difficult
situation, or is troubled with anxiety? And here the confessor must come
to his assistance and comfort him.
Hearing the confessions of priests is a matter of the highest importance,
as priests are appointed by God shepherds, teachers, and guides of souls;
they are the light of the world and the salt of the earth. A worthy
priest effects much good amongst the faithful by a holy, pious, pure,
virtuous, and zealous life! But how harmful is the lukewarmness, the
neglect of duty, the levity of one who by his faults and open sins gives
scandal to the people. What a great and significant task is it for the
confessor to teach, rouse, warn, threaten, and encourage his brother in
the holy priesthood!
Let the confessor treat his penitent with reverence; although the
latter kneels before him to accuse himself as a sinner, he is still a
priest, clothed with exalted dignity. He must also treat him with true,
fraternal, zealous and courageous _love_, which discloses the wounds of
the soul, points out dangers and evil inclinations, blames when blame is
necessary, and punishes when punishment is necessary. It would, indeed,
be rendering bad service to a fellow-priest simply to listen to him, to
give him a few general exhortations, and then to absolve him.
If the penitent is a conscientious, well-instructed priest (which may
without difficulty be inferred from the manner of the confession, if
he is not already known to the confessor), it is not necessary to put
questions to him; if the confessor has doubts as to the gravity of
a sin confessed, he can ask the penitent if he thought that he was
committing a mortal sin. The exhortation, however, should scarcely ever
be omitted; let it be short and appropriate; it may be given in indirect
form, “we priests,” etc. If the penitent is frivolous and superficial,
questions must be put to him, in order to complete his confession. These
questions may turn on the recitation of the Office, the celebration of
Mass, administration of the Sacraments, and other priestly and pastoral
duties.[1015]
Toward such penitents the confessor must be fearless, and administer
to them, whoever they may be, regardless of rank, esteem, and dignity,
reproof, and refuse absolution, if necessary; for example, when they are
_occasionarii_ or relapsing sinners. St. Alphonsus adds: _Potissimum hac
fortidudine agendum est cum sacerdotibus, qui in gravia peccata relapsi,
quin se unquam emendaverint, ausi sunt tamen celebrare, aucupando
absolutionem ab aliquo confessariorum qui hoc funguntur officio et
laborant, ut damnentur. Hi sacerdotes pravis habitibus detenti palam
solent in sacristia confiteri, ut absolutionem, quæ eis denegenda esset,
extorqueant sub prætextu scandali, quod eveniret (quemadmodum illi
exponunt), si a celebrando desistere deberent. Sit constans confessarius
cum hujusmodi sacrilegis in differenda absolutione, eos adstringat ad
repetendas confessiones tanquam irritas, et ad confitendum de omnibus
Sacrificiis celebratis: et interim ad abstinendum a celebratione,
usquedum suæ emendationis perspicua indicia præbebunt. Quod si quis
diceret, ob scandalum a celebrando abstinere non posse, respondeat quod
deesse non possunt justi prætextus, si vellet desistere a celebrando;
ceterum si ipse id facere renuit, dicat quod celebrare potest si est
certus, se habere contritionem, sed quod ipse pro tunc non potest eum
absolvere, dum certus non est, ut oportet, de ejus dispositione; imo
justum habet motivum credendi oppositum, cum observet tot lapsus sine
emendatione. Et hoc modo agendi potest sperari, fore ut recipiscat et
salvetur ille miser sacerdos, secus ambo damnabuntur._[1016]
But the priest (especially a young one) must not be bewildered if an
unfortunate brother priest, burdened with grave sins, approaches him to
make his confession. Let him remember that there was a Judas amongst the
apostles; that the chief of the apostles was guilty of a very grave sin;
let him also bear in mind the words of the Lord: _Necesse est, ut veniant
scandala_ (Matt. xviii. 7).
As to the _exhortations_ which the confessor should give to priest
penitents, they should be chiefly: (1) to remember their calling, their
exalted dignity, their duties, their reward; (2) to devote themselves
wholly to their sublime office, to labor for the salvation of souls,
and for the glory of God by their prayers, their example, and the
exercise of the sacred ministry; to have special care for the sick and
dying, the poor and the young; (3) to avoid, especially, four vices, as
being, above all, unworthy of their spiritual calling and presenting
particular dangers for priests,—sloth, impurity, drunkenness, and
avarice (covetousness). The priest must often renew his purpose of
leading a virtuous life and of striving to obtain perfection. This
resolution always revives the priest’s zeal in the performance of his
sacred functions, gives joy in the exercise of virtue, strength to resist
temptations, and perseverance in his efforts. But that the priest may be
true to this resolution, he must employ various means, especially:—
1. Zeal in prayer; the priest must be a man of prayer; he must practice
mental and vocal prayer. _Sine oratione mentali difficillime bonus
erit Sacerdos; nam sine ea intellectus carebit lumine, quo cognoscat
veritates æternas et mysteria divini amoris, atque inde deerit in
voluntate calor fervoris, quo novatur ad sancte vivendum._[1017] The
priest should, therefore, fix a definite time everyday—at least a quarter
of an hour, if at all possible, half an hour—during which to devote
himself to meditation. Morning is the best time, as one is less exposed
to distractions then than in the midst of the occupations and cares of
the day. Those who answer, however, that they have no time for daily
meditation should consider if their lukewarmness and carelessness are
not much more to blame than want of time. If they gave up superfluous
pleasures, visiting, and other unnecessary things, or at least reduced
them, they would certainly be able to spare a quarter of an hour on most
days for meditation.[1018]
Not less necessary for the priest is oral prayer. _Clama ad me et ego
exaudiam_, says the Lord (Jerem. xxxiii. 3); for if it is certain that
the priest daily requires new graces, it is also certain that he must ask
for them daily. Besides the priest is the mediator between God and His
people, and therefore must supplicate for them. “_Absit a me poc peccatum
in Dominum, ut cessem orare pro vobis_” 1 Kings xii. 23 (Samuel); “_Et
rogante pro eis Sacerdote, propitius erit eis Dominus_” (Lev. iv. 20).
2. Of all the prayers that the priest must say, none is more excellent,
with the exception of the holy Mass, none is more efficacious than the
_Officium divinum_. Let the priest say it punctually, faithfully, with
recollection and with pleasure.
3. The center of the sacred ministry is the celebration of the holy
sacrifice. For this most holy mystery he should prepare himself with
care, celebrate it with the greatest possible purity of heart, interior
devotion, and exterior reverence, and with careful observance of the wise
precepts of the Church which bind under grave sin (_ex genere suo_). The
priest must be on his guard against three chief faults in the celebration
of Mass: celebration in _haste_, out of _custom_, and _in a state of
grave sin_.
4. Another means of sanctification is _frequent confession_. At least
every eight days the priest should make a good confession, and only
on account of great distance from a confessor should he delay it a
fortnight. So St. Charles Borromeo determined in the first provincial
council and in his celebrated Instructions. But the priest should
also observe the other advice of this enlightened Saint (_in Decretis
visitatoris_): _Valde utile esset, ut Sacerdos unusquisque ... certum
ac firmum Confessarium Sacerdotem haberet ex approbatis, a quo nisi in
magna necessitate recederet; si quidem animæ solet non minus obesse
Confessariorum mutatio, quam corpori Medicorum._
5. The good priest loves the _study of wisdom_, and observes the
admonition which St. Paul gave to his pupil, Timothy: _Attende tibi et
doctrinæ; insta in illis. Hoc enim faciens te ipsum salvum facies et
eos qui te audiunt_ (1 Tim. iv. 13, 16). Continual, zealous study of
theology alone enables the priest to do his duty, to be a teacher of the
people in the science of salvation, and to administer the holy Sacrament
of Confession rightly and successfully; at the same time it preserves
him from many evils and dangers, and it is to him a source of exalted
pleasure.
6. Another means which contributes much to sanctification is to be found
in the _Exercitia spiritualia_, which priests should make every year, at
least every two years. Immense is the blessing which results to the whole
Church and to the individual priests who zealously perform them in the
right spirit and in the right manner.[1019]
CHAPTER III
PENITENTS IN EXTREME DANGER
84. The Importance of the Priest’s Ministry at the Bedside of the Sick
and the Dying.
As the grace of perseverance and eternal salvation depends upon a good
death, as a bad death can never be remedied, and as man’s helplessness is
never greater than in that terrible last struggle, in which a thousand
things disturb and confuse him, the bitterest pains afflict and the most
violent temptations beset him, it is a work most pleasing to God, and
most conducive to the salvation of souls, to bring spiritual aid to the
sick and dying. The good, zealous priest is an ardent friend of the sick
and the dying, following in this the example of our divine Savior (Matt.
ix. 35). It was always the glory of Catholic priests that they were to be
found at the bedside of the sick and the dying, making no distinction,
and undeterred by the worst infectious diseases. And when all flee, the
priest remains and is prepared to sacrifice himself in order to save the
sick one. Therefore Dr. Stöhr says most truly in his “Pastoral Medicine”
(p. 241): “The chronicles of epidemic disease record upon each of their
pages the most splendid examples of that joyful self-sacrificing courage
with which the whole secular and Regular clergy have stood faithfully at
their posts in the hour of the greatest need, in the days when a reign
of terror dissolved all ties of society. For the Catholic pastor of
souls this form of courage is just as much a principle of professional
honor, and, therefore, I venture to say, as much a matter of course, as
in an officer bravery before the enemy.” In the moment of greatest need
(_in articulo mortis_) any priest, as already stated, can administer the
consolations of religion; reserved cases and censures do not exist. And
_every_ priest should, therefore, be solicitous to obtain the necessary
knowledge in order to be able to administer the holy Sacraments to a
dying person in case of necessity. As visiting the sick is, of itself,
forbidden to no one, and, as St. Alphonsus remarks,[1020] “_Every_
priest, even he who has no talent for preaching, can engage upon it,
rendering by so doing the greatest service, not only to the sick man
himself, but also to his relations and friends,” _every_ priest should
acquire a facility in comforting the sick according to their special
needs and circumstances.
In order, therefore, that the priest may effectually assist the sick and
the dying, he should, before he betakes himself to the sick-room, observe
the following:—
1. Reflect that he is about to perform a work of the greatest importance,
and that the errors which he commits in it are of the worst kind, and
cannot, as a rule, be remedied.[1021]
2. Remember that in this most important work the help of God is necessary
to him; he should not, therefore, trust in himself, but wholly in God.
3. Endeavor to awaken and preserve the purest and most perfect intention
possible, the intention of saving a soul which Jesus Christ has purchased
by His blood.
4. Earnestly pray for the success of his work.
5. Study well what he has to do and to say. He should consider the
particular manner in which he has to treat the patient to whom he is
going; for he is undertaking a more important work than preaching a
sermon, and yet he must prepare for every sermon.[1022]
6. Learn the character, the habits, the circumstances, and the situation
of the sick person, if he is not already in possession of this
knowledge.[1023]
85. The Confessions of the Sick.
_I. Some preliminary remarks._
1. The confessions of the sick and the dying are of the greatest
importance, as, in many cases, they open the gates of heaven to them,
and prepare them for the worthy reception of the other Sacraments. On
this account parish priests, and priests in general who have the care
of souls, are strictly bound to hear the confessions of those in danger
of death, even in face of great difficulties and of danger to their own
lives. The priest may, in such a case, even interrupt Mass (even during
the Canon) if no other priest is at hand.[1024] Let him, therefore,
before he visits the sick person to hear his confession, earnestly pray
for grace; let him enter upon this important duty with zeal and love, but
also with great prudence and judgment, confiding in God, and where there
is danger, let him face it with apostolic courage. Let him not forget
that the eternal salvation of the sick person is in his hands, that he
can save his soul; but that this soul may also be lost by his fault if
his action is careless, tardy, imprudent, and faulty.
2. In the presence of the sick person, however the latter may be
circumstanced, and, however he may have lived, the confessor must
manifest for him a great love and a sincere sympathy.
3. If he were not called by the sick person to hear his confession,
but by those around him, or if he went unsummoned,[1025] and if there
is no danger of death, he should not mention confession at once during
the first visit, but address the patient in a friendly manner, ask him
sympathetically about his illness, etc., as sick people like to talk
about these things. He should then admonish him to resign himself to the
will of God, to unite his sufferings to the bitter sufferings of Jesus,
and to bear them patiently in satisfaction for sin.[1026] In subsequent
visits, he should gradually prepare him for confession; ask him when he
made his last confession; remark that it is better to confess before the
illness increases, because this will render it more difficult; that the
graces of the holy Sacrament of Penance procure for the soul the peace
which it desires; that they conduce to patience in suffering. Let the
priest awaken in the sick person a hope that God will restore his health,
but at the same time, be careful that he recognizes the gravity of his
illness, and that he does not place undue confidence in doctors and their
skill. In order not to expose the patient to the danger of dying without
the Sacraments by misjudging the gravity of the case, the priest should
ask the doctor whether the condition of the patient is precarious. The
friends may also be privately asked if the sick person wishes to confess
to another priest, adding that there would be no objection whatever to
his doing so.[1027]
4. If the sick person is a _peccator publicus_, living, for example, in
concubinage, or in the so-called “civil marriage,” the confession should
not, as a rule, be heard before amendment and due satisfaction have been
seriously promised; for if the priest hears the confession, and the
person refuses to fulfill the conditions, the priest will, on account of
the seal of the confessional, be obliged to allow viaticum and Extreme
Unction to be administered to one who is unworthy,—indeed, perhaps be
obliged to administer these Sacraments himself.
5. If the sick person begs that the confession may be deferred, and if
danger of death, lethargy, or delirium is not imminent, this postponement
should be granted, but the patient must at once fix a time for the
confession, perhaps on the same or the following day. The priest should
not consent to indefinite postponement. If, however, danger threatens,
he should not consent to postponement at all, but use all his efforts
to induce the patient to confess at once, firmly but kindly, and
considerately removing all his objections; especially pointing out to him
the great danger to which he exposes himself by this postponement; as God
has promised pardon to the penitent sinner, but has not promised to give
him the next day.[1028] The confessor must, therefore, investigate the
patient’s reasons for wishing to postpone his confession. The real reason
is generally either (1) because _his conscience is burdened with sin_,
he has not confessed for a long time, or confessed badly, and therefore
despairs of unburdening his conscience, the task being above his
strength, as he thinks; or (2) because he has an _obdurate heart_, not
caring about his salvation, or he so despairs of his salvation that he
rejects all attempts from outside as useless and troublesome. The priest
may not give up such a patient, nor leave him till the last moment; he
must pray much, and cause others to pray for him, endure humiliations
cheerfully, and exhaust every means that love, zeal for souls, and wisdom
can possibly suggest.
In the first of the two cases, the priest should offer the sick person
his help, and promise him to make the confession quite easy for him,
telling him that with a little good will, he will certainly make a good
confession, and so obtain pardon, grace, and salvation. The inexhaustible
mercy of God should be especially and most earnestly impressed upon him;
he should be reminded of the sufferings and death of Jesus for sinners;
of the parables of the prodigal son, the lost sheep, the joy of the
angels over _one_ sinner doing penance, of the great examples of mercy:
Peter, Mary Magdalen, the thief on the cross, etc.
In the other case the difficulty is greater, for it is indeed difficult
to soften an obdurate heart. Here, fervent, continued prayer is
necessary. Those terrible and consoling truths which our faith supplies
so abundantly should, at suitable intervals, and with eloquence and
_unction_, be laid before him: the misery of the impenitent sinner,
the severity of the divine judgment, the eternity of punishment, the
happiness of the sinner reconciled to God, the peace of the soul adorned
with sanctifying grace, the eternal joys which await him, etc. If all
this does not produce upon the sick person the desired effect, he should
be left to himself for some time, in order that he may reflect upon what
he has heard. In the meantime, pray; then visit him again, and speak to
him again, and proceed in this manner till success results, or till an
impenitent death closes an impenitent life.[1029]
II. _The confession of the sick person._
1. If the sick person shows himself ready to make his confession, the
confessor must help him in every way to fulfill the conditions necessary
for the reception of the Sacrament of Penance; thus he should help him
to examine his conscience, to elicit contrition, to make a complete
confession, and to perform the penance.
And first, as to the completeness of the confession, the penitent’s
condition must be taken into consideration. If the confession can be put
off without danger, he should be admonished to examine his conscience
according to his ability and to prepare for a general confession.[1030]
If it cannot be put off, or if the confessor is under the necessity of
supposing that the patient is not well able to make such an examination
of conscience, he must help him. But he must be careful to avoid worrying
him by asking too many questions.[1031]
The following cases deserve special attention:—
(_a_) If the sick person has lost the power of speech, and can thus only
indicate a few sins by signs, or in some other way. In this case the
priest will be able to elicit the confession of a few sins, and that
suffices.
(_b_) If the sick person is so weak that he can only confess a few sins,
or having confessed a few, faints, or seems about to faint, or when the
patient has not confessed for some considerable time, or invalidly, and
the gravity of the illness or the nearness of death does not permit of
postponing the absolution.
(_c_) When the confessions of many dangerously sick or dying persons are
to be heard, and there is no time for a complete confession.
(_d_) When the priest has arrived at the house of the sick person with
the viaticum, and cannot, without endangering the good name of the
sick person, hear a complete confession.[1032] In this case, let the
priest visit the sick person as soon as possible after administering the
Sacraments and supply what was wanting.
(_e_) When a dangerously sick or a wounded person, or _mulieres
parturientes_, require the assistance of another even during the
confession. In this case, the sick person may confess some sin of which
he is not ashamed to accuse himself before others, or the confessor may
ask him if he accuses himself of all the sins he has committed, and
repents of them, because by them he has offended God, and ask him, in
particular, if he has committed this or that (slight) sin, such as people
of his class are generally guilty of.[1033] Similarly when the priest
does not understand the language of the sick person, and the latter
confesses through an interpreter.[1034]
(_f_) When the sick person has a contagious disease, and, in the opinion
of experts, there would be danger of infection to the priest if the
confession lasted long. Nevertheless, the priest would, in this case, do
well to overcome the fear of infection, trusting in God and making use
of the necessary precautions, and be ready to sacrifice his life in the
service of God and his neighbor.
In all these and similar cases, the patient must duly repent of all grave
sins, and have the will to confess the sins which he has omitted if he
is able to make a new confession. Indeed, there are cases in which a
purely general accusation by word or sign, or a request for absolution,
expressed in any way, suffices for obtaining absolution, that is, when
no other means of confession is available. Even if a wish expressed to
others, or the desire for a priest, can be regarded as confession when
the penitent has become unconscious.[1035]
2. The confessor should question the patient so that he need simply
answer without being obliged to talk much. If he is not well acquainted
with the state of his soul, let him ask the patient if he has always
confessed validly (this question may also be put to all sick penitents),
or if, in his past life, he always wished to confess well, if he ever
voluntarily concealed a grave sin, and has not yet confessed it, if he
has anything else upon his conscience which disturbs him. According to
his character, and the state in which the confessor finds the penitent,
he should, moreover, ask if he still has in his possession anything
belonging to another, or if, for some other reason, he still has
restitution to make of property, or honor and good name; if he harbors
hatred and enmity toward any one; if he has ever lived in a sinful habit,
and if he has expiated these sins in a general confession. If restitution
has to be made, and he can make it at the time, the duty of so doing at
once must be imposed upon him, and he must not be allowed to leave this
duty to his heirs; unless the latter be thoroughly trustworthy, the dying
person believing this to be sufficient and not easily being induced to
another expedient. If the restitution cannot at once take place, he must,
at least, have an actual intention of making it as soon as possible, and
of taking the necessary steps toward insuring its being made—either by a
will, or by an injunction to those belonging to him.[1036]