1. “_Why boastest thou thyself in mischief, O mighty man?_” Doeg had

small matter for boasting in having procured the slaughter of a band of

defenceless priests. A mighty man indeed to kill men who never touched a

sword! He ought to have been ashamed of his cowardice. He had no room

for exultation! Honourable titles are but irony where the wearer is mean

and cruel. If David alluded to Saul, he meant by these words pityingly

to say, “How can one by nature fitted for nobler deeds, descend to so

low a level as to find a theme for boasting in a slaughter so heartless

and mischievous?” “_The goodness of God endureth continually._” A

beautiful contrast. The tyrant’s fury cannot dry up the perennial stream

of divine mercy. If priests be slain their Master lives. If Doeg for

awhile triumphs the Lord will outlive him, and right the wrongs which he

has done. This ought to modify the proud exultations of the wicked, for

after all, while the Lord liveth, iniquity has little cause to exalt

itself.

2. “_Thy tongue deviseth mischiefs._” Thou speakest with an ulterior

design. The information given was for Saul’s assistance apparently, but

in very deed in his heart the Edomite hated the priests of the God of

Jacob. It is a mark of deep depravity, when the evil spoken is craftily

intended to promote a yet greater evil. “_Like a sharp razor, working

deceitfully._” David represents the false tongue as being effectual for

mischief, like a razor which, unawares to the person operated on, is

making him bald; so softly and deftly do Oriental barbers perform their

work. Or he may mean that as with a razor a man’s throat may be cut very

speedily, under the pretence of shaving him, even thus keenly, basely,

but effectually Doeg destroyed the band of the priests. Whetted by

malice, and guided by craft, he did his cruel work with accursed

thoroughness.

3. “_Thou lovest evil more than good._” He loved not good at all. If

both had been equally profitable and pleasant, he would have preferred

evil. “_And lying rather than to speak righteousness._” He was more at

home at lying than at truth. He spake not the truth except by accident,

but he delighted heartily in falsehood. “SELAH.” Let us pause and look

at the proud, blustering liar. Doeg is gone, but other dogs bark at the

Lord’s people. Saul’s cattle-master is buried, but the devil still has

his drovers, who fain would hurry the saints like sheep to the

slaughter.

4 Thou lovest all devouring words, O _thou_ deceitful tongue.

5 God shall likewise destroy thee for ever, he shall take thee away,

and pluck thee out of _thy_ dwelling place, and root thee out of the

land of the living. Selah.

4. “_Thou lovest._” Thou hast a taste, a gusto for evil language. “_All

devouring words._” There are words that, like boa-constrictors, swallow

men whole, or like lions, rend men to pieces; these words evil minds are

fond of. Their oratory is evermore furious and bloody. That which will

most readily provoke the lowest passions they are sure to employ, and

they think such pandering to the madness of the wicked to be eloquence

of a high order. “_O thou deceitful tongue._” Men can manage to say a

great many furious things, and yet cover all over with the pretext of

justice. They claim that they are jealous for the right, but the truth

is they are determined to put down truth and holiness, and craftily go

about it under this transparent pretence.

5. “_God shall likewise destroy thee for ever._” Fain would the

persecutor destroy the church, and therefore God shall destroy him, pull

down his house, pluck up his roots, and make an end of him. “_He shall

take thee away._” God shall extinguish his coal and sweep him away like

the ashes of the hearth; he would have quenched the truth, and God shall

quench him. “_And pluck thee out of thy dwelling place_,” like a plant

torn from the place where it grew, or a captive dragged from his home.

Ahimelech and his brother priests were cut off from their abode, and so

should those be who compassed and contrived their murder. “_And root

thee out of the land of the living._” The persecutor shall be

eradicated, stubbed up by the root, cut up root and branch. He sought

the death of others and death shall fall upon him. He troubled the land

of the living, and he shall be banished to that land where the wicked

cease from troubling. Those who will not “let live” have no right to

“live.” God will turn the tables on malicious men, and mete to them a

portion with their own measure. “SELAH.” Pause again, and behold the

divine justice proving itself more than a match for human sin.

6 The righteous also shall see, and fear, and shall laugh at him:

7 Lo, _this is_ the man _that_ made not God his strength; but

trusted in the abundance of his riches, _and_ strengthened himself

in his wickedness.

8 But I _am_ like a green olive tree in the house of God: I trust in

the mercy of God for ever and ever.

9 I will praise thee for ever, because thou hast done _it_: and I

will wait on thy name; for _it_ is good before thy saints.

6. “_The righteous_”—the object of the tyrant’s hatred—shall outlive his

enmity, and “also shall see,” before his own face, the end of the

ungodly oppressor. God permits Mordecai to see Haman hanging on the

gallows. David had brought to him the tokens of Saul’s death on Gilboa.

“_And fear._” Holy awe shall sober the mind of the good man; he shall

reverently adore the God of providence. “_And shall laugh at him._” If

not with righteous joy, yet with solemn contempt. Schemes so

far-reaching all baffled, plans so deep, so politic, all thwarted.

Mephistopheles outwitted, the old serpent taken in his own subtlety.

This is a goodly theme for that deep-seated laughter which is more akin

to solemnity than merriment.

7. “_Lo._” Look ye here, and read the epitaph of a mighty man, who

lorded it proudly during his little hour, and set his heel upon the

necks of the Lord’s chosen. “_This is the man that made not God his

strength._” Behold the man! The great vainglorious man. He found a

fortress, but not in God; he gloried in his might, but not in the

Almighty. Where is he now? How has it fared with him in the hour of his

need? Behold his ruin, and be instructed. “_But trusted in the abundance

of his riches, and strengthened himself in his wickedness._” The

substance he had gathered, and the mischiefs he had wrought, were his

boast and glory. Wealth and wickedness are dreadful companions; when

combined they make a monster. When the devil is master of money bags, he

is a devil indeed. Beelzebub and Mammon together heat the furnace seven

times hotter for the child of God, but in the end they shall work out

their own destruction. Wherever we see to-day a man great in sin and

substance, we shall do well to anticipate his end. and view this verse

as the divine _in memoriam_.

8. “_But I_,” hunted and persecuted though I am, “_am like a green olive

tree_.” I am not plucked up or destroyed, but am like a flourishing

olive, which out of the rock draws oil, and amid the drought still lives

and grows. “_In the house of God._” He was one of the divine family, and

could not be expelled from it; his place was near his God, and there was

he safe and happy, despite all the machinations of his foes. He was

bearing fruit, and would continue to do so when all his proud enemies

were withered like branches lopped from the tree. “_I trust in the mercy

of God for ever and ever._” Eternal mercy is my present confidence.

David knew God’s mercy to be eternal and perpetual, and in that he

trusted. What a rock to build on! What a fortress to fly to!

9. “_I will praise thee for ever._” Like thy mercy shall my thankfulness

be. While others boast in their riches I will boast in my God; and when

their glorying is silenced for ever in the tomb, my song shall continue

to proclaim the lovingkindness of Jehovah. “_Because thou hast done

it._” Thou hast vindicated the righteous, and punished the wicked. God’s

memorable acts of providence, both to saints and sinners, deserve and

must have our gratitude. David views his prayers as already answered,

the promises of God as already fulfilled, and therefore at once lifts up

the sacred Psalm. “_And I will wait on thy name._” God shall still be

the Psalmist’s hope; he will not in future look elsewhere. He whose name

has been so gloriously made known in truth and righteousness, is justly

chosen as our expectation for years to come. “_For it is good before thy

saints._” Before or among the saints David intended to wait, feeling it

to be good both for him and them to look to the Lord alone, and wait for

the manifestation of his character in due season. Men must not too much

fluster us; our strength is to sit still. Let the mighty ones boast, we

will wait on the Lord; and if their haste brings them present honour,

our patience will have its turn by-and-by, and bring us the honour which

excelleth.

EXPLANATORY NOTES AND QUAINT SAYINGS.

_Title._—That _Maschil_ means a sacred composition, is evident from the

seventh verse of the 47th Psalm, where the passage which we render,

“Sing ye praises with understanding,” is literally, “Sing ye a

_Maschil_,” or song of instruction. This word occurs as a title in

thirteen places; and six times is prefixed to compositions of David’s.

In several instances it occurs in consecutive Psalms; _i.e._, in the

42nd (of which the 43rd is the sequel), the 44th and 45th, the 52nd,

53rd, 54th, and 55th, the 88th and 89th. A circumstance which favours

the notion that the term was one peculiarly used by some particular

editor or collector of a certain portion of the Psalter.—_John Jebb._

_Verse 1 (first clause).—Why doth he glory in malice that is mighty?_

that is, he, that in malice is mighty, why doth he glory? There is need

that a man be mighty but in goodness, not in malice. Is it any great

thing to glory in malice? To build a house doth belong to few men, any

ignorant man you please can pull down. To sow wheat, to dress the crop,

to wait until it ripen, and in that fruit on which one has laboured to

rejoice, doth belong to few men: with one spark any man you please can

burn all the crop.... What art thou about to do, O mighty man, what art

thou about to do, boasting thyself much? Thou art about to kill a man:

this thing also a scorpion, this also a fever, this also a poisonous

fungus can do. To this is thy mightiness reduced, that it be made equal

to a poisonous fungus!—_Augustine._

_Verse 1._—By “_mischief_” is understood not simply what evil he had

done, but the prosperity which he now enjoyed, obtained through

mischief; as is clear both from the word _boasting_ and from the seventh

verse.... Formerly he was the chief of Saul’s shepherds (1 Sam. xxi. 8),

but by that wicked destruction of the priests of God by Saul, and the

execution of the cruel sentence, he obtained the chief place near to the

king (_ibid._ xxii. 9).—_Hermann Venema._

_Verse 1.—“O mighty man.”_ These words may be added either by way of

irony, as if he had said, A great deal of valour and prowess you have

shown in slaying a company of unarmed men, the priests of the Lord, yea,

women and children, no way able to resist you; or else to imply the

ground of his vain boasting, to wit, either his present greatness, as

being a man in great place, and of great power with Saul; or the great

preferments he expected from Saul.—_Arthur Jackson._

_Verse 1.—“The goodness of God endureth continually.”_ He contrasts the

_goodness_ of God with the wealth and might of Doeg, and the foundation

of his own confidence as widely different from that of Doeg, his own

placed upon the goodness of God, enduring for ever and showing itself

effectual. It is as if he had said, The _goodness_ of God to which I

trust, is most powerful and the same throughout all time, and in it I

shall at all times most surely rejoice that _goodness_ of God, since now

it sustains me, so it will exalt me in its own good time; it therefore

_is_, and _will be above me_.... Not without emphasis does he say the

goodness אֵל _of the strong God_, a contrast to Doeg the _hero_, and the

ruinous foundation of his fortune.—_Hermann Venema._

_Verse 2.—“Thy tongue deviseth mischiefs, like a sharp razor, working

deceitfully.”_ Thus our version. But I do not very well understand the

propriety of _the tongue’s devising mischief_, and devising it _like a

sharp razor_. But we may easily avoid this harsh comparison by rendering

the words: _Thou contrivest mischiefs with thy tongue, as with a sharp

razor, O thou dealer in deceit_: _i.e._, Thou contrivest with thy smooth

and flattering tongue to wound the reputation and character of others,

as though thou wast cutting their throats with a smooth razor.—_Samuel

Chandler._

_Verse 2.—“Like a sharp razor,”_ that instead of shaving the hair

lanceth the flesh; or missing the beard cutteth the throat.—_John

Trapp._

_Verse 2._—The smooth, adroit manner of executing a wicked device

neither hides nor abates its wickedness. Murder with “_a sharp razor_”

is as wicked as murder with a meat-axe or a bludgeon. A lie very

ingeniously framed and rehearsed in an oily manner, is as great a sin,

and in the end will be seen to be as great a folly as the most bungling

attempt at deception.—_William S. Plumer._

_Verse 3.—“Thou lovest evil more than good.”_—“_Thou hast loved evil_,”

he says, “_more than good_,” not by simply preferring it, but by

substituting it; so that in the stead of good he hath done evil, and

that from the inmost love of his soul, bent upon evil; wherefore he does

not say that he _admitted_, but _loved evil_, not _moral_ only, but

_physical_, for the destruction of his neighbours; so _to have loved_

it, that he willed nothing but _evil_, being averse to all

good.—_Hermann Venema._

_Verse 4.—“Thou lovest all devouring words, O thou deceitful

tongue.”_—He was all _tongue_; a _man of words_: and these the most

deceitful and injurious.—_Adam Clarke._

_Verse 5.—“God shall destroy thee for ever,”_ etc. There are four words

the Psalmist makes use of to denote the utter vengeance that awaited

this deceitful and bloody wretch, all of them having a very strong

meaning. The first, יִתָּצךָ from נָחַץ, signifies _to pull down_, and

break utterly into pieces; as when an altar is demolished. (Judges vi.

30; viii. 9.) The second, יַחְתְּךָ from the root חֶתֶה, which signifies

_to twist_ anything, or _pluck it up by twisting it round_, as trees are

sometimes twisted up. The third, יסָּחֲךָ from נָסַח, which properly

signifies _utterly to sweep away anything like dust or chaff_; and the

expression יסָּחֲךָ מֵאֹהֶל means not _sweep thee away from thy tent_,

but, _sweep thee away, that thou mayest be no longer a tent_; thyself,

thy family, thy fortune, shall be wholly and entirely swept away, and

dissipated for ever; to which the fourth word, שֵׁרֶשְׁךָ, answers,

_eradicabit te_, he shall root thee out _from the land of the living_.

’Tis impossible words can express a more entire and absolute

destruction.—_Samuel Chandler._

_Verse 5.—“God shall likewise destroy thee for ever.”_ Here are _quot

verba tot tonotrua_, so many words, so many thunderclaps. As thou hast

destroyed the Lord’s priests, and their whole city, razing and harassing

it; so God will demolish and destroy thee utterly as an house pulled

down to the ground, so that one stone is not left upon another (Lev.

xiv. 45); so shall God pull down Doeg from that high preferment, which

he by sycophancy hath got at court.—_John Trapp._

_Verse 5._—Wonderful is the force of the verbs in the original, which

convey to us the four ideas of _laying prostrate, dissolving as by fire,

sweeping away as with a besom, and totally extirpating root and branch_,

as a tree is eradicated from the spot on which it grew. If a farther

comment be wanted, it may be found in the history of David’s enemies,

and the crucifiers of the Son of David; but the passage will be fully

and finally explained by the destruction of the world of the ungodly at

the last day.—_George Horne._

_Verse 5._—The poet accumulates dire and heavy words, and mingles

various metaphors that he might paint the picture of this man’s

destruction in more lively colours. Three metaphors appear to be joined

together, the first taken from a _building_, the second from a _tent_,

the third from a _tree_, if attention is given to the force and common

acceptation of the words.—_Hermann Venema._

_Verse 5.—“He shall take thee away;”_ or, _seize thee_, as coals are

taken with the tongs.—_J. J. Stewart Perowne._

_Verse 6.—“The righteous also shall see,”_ etc. That is, to use the apt

words of Gejerus, “_This shall not be a secret judgment, or known only

to a few, but common fame shall spread abroad throughout the kingdom, or

city, the notable punishment of the ungodly. The righteous also shall

not pass by such an event with indifference but with earnest eyes shall

contemplate it_,” etc. I add, and hence shall they take joy, and turn it

to their own use, to the greater fearing of God.... _The righteous_,

upon whose destruction the ungodly man was intent, shall survive and

spend their lives safe in the favour of God; _they shall see_ with

attentive mind, they shall consider; nor, as worldlings are accustomed,

shall they pass it by without reflection or improvement, they shall see

and _fear_, namely, God the just judge; and instructed in his judgment

by this instance, they shall be the more careful to abstain from all

designs and crimes of the kind.—_Hermann Venema._

_Verse 6.—“And shall laugh at him;”_ or _over him_—over the wicked man

thus cast down—_they shall laugh_. Such exultation, to our modern

sensibilities, seems shocking, because we can hardly conceive of it,

apart from the gratification of personal vindictiveness. But there is

such a thing as a righteous hatred, as a righteous scorn. There is such

a thing as a shout of righteous joy at the downfall of the tyrant and

the oppressor, at the triumph of righteousness and truth over wrong and

falsehood.—_J. J. Stewart Perowne._

_Verse 7.—“Lo, this is the man that made not God his strength.”_ David

having showed (in verses 5, 6) the wicked man, by the righteous judgment

of God rooted out of the land of the living, shows us in the next verse,

the righteous man at once fearing and laughing at this sight, as also

pointing at him saying, “_Lo this is the man that made not God his

strength._” The words are a divine but cutting sarcasm. The original is

_geber_, which signifieth a strong, valiant man: as we say in English,

Lo, this is the brave and gallant man you wot of! But who was this for a

man? He was one, saith he, that “_trusted in the abundance of his

riches_.” Oh! ’tis hard to abound in riches and not to trust in them.

Hence that caution (Psalm lxii. 10): “If riches increase, set not your

heart upon them.” Now, what is the setting the heart upon riches but our

rejoicing and trusting in them? And because the heart of man is so

easily persuaded into this sinful trust upon riches, therefore the

apostle is urgent with Timothy to persuade all rich men—not only mere

worldly rich men, but godly rich men—against it; yea, he urgeth Timothy

to persuade rich men against two sins, which are worse than all the

poverty in the world, yet the usual attendants of riches—pride and

confidence: “Charge them that are rich in this world, that they be not

highminded.” 1 Tim. vi. 17.—_Joseph Caryl._

_Verses 7, 8._—Perhaps some of you have been long professors, and yet

come to little growth in love to God, humility, heavenly-mindedness,

mortification; and it is worth the digging to see what lies at the root

of your profession, whether there be not a legal principle that hath too

much influenced you. Have you not thought to carry all with God from

your duties and services, and too much laid up your hopes in your own

actings? Alas! this is as so much dead earth, which must be thrown out,

and gospel principles laid in the room thereof. Try but this course, and

try whether the spring of thy grace will not come on apace. David gives

an account how he came to stand and flourish when some that were rich

and mighty, on a sudden withered and came to nothing. “_Lo_,” saith he,

“_this is the man that made not God his strength; but trusted in the

abundance of his riches_.” “_But I am like a green olive tree in the

house of God: I trust in the mercy of God for ever and ever._” While

others trust in the riches of their own righteousness and services, and

make not Christ their strength, do thou renounce all, and trust in the

mercy of God in Christ, and thou shalt be like a green olive when they

fade and wither.—_William Gurnall._

_Verse 8 (first clause)_:—

“But I an olive charged with fruit

In fertile soil that grows.”

This appears to express the meaning of the Hebrew words, which our

translators render, “_like a green olive tree_,” but which in reality

have no reference to the colour, but to the flourishing, vigorous, and

thriving state of the plant; just as Homer gives it the epithet of

“luxuriant,” and “flourishing;” and Ovid that of “ever-flourishing.” The

fact is, the colour of the leaves of this tree is not a bright, lively

green; but a dark, disagreeable, or yellowish one. Scheuchzen describes

the leaves, as “_superne coloris atrovirentis, vel in virdi

flavescentis_.” An English traveller, writing from Italy, thus expresses

his disappointment about the olive tree:—“The fields, and indeed the

whole face of Tuscany, are in a manner covered with olive trees; but the

olive tree does not answer the character I had conceived of it. The

royal Psalmist and some of the sacred writers, speak with rapture of the

‘green olive tree,’ so that I expected a beautiful green; and I confess

to you, I was wretchedly disappointed to find its hue resembling that of

our hedges when they are covered with dust.” I have heard other

travellers express the same feeling of disappointment. “The true way of

solving the difficulty,” as Harmer properly remarks, “is to consider the

word translated ‘green,’ not as descriptive of colour, but of some other

property; youthfulness, vigour, prosperity, or the like.”—_Richard

Mant._

_Verse 8.—“Green olive tree in the house of God.”_—Several expositors

fancifully imagine that olive trees grew in certain of the courts of the

Tabernacle; but the notion must not be endured, it would have been too

near an approach to the groves of the heathen to have been tolerated, at

least in David’s time. The text should surely be read with some

discretion; the poet does not refer to olive trees in God’s house, but

compares _himself in the house of God_ to an olive tree. This reminds us

of the passage, “Thy children like olive plants around thy table,” where

some whose imaginations have been more lively than their judgments, have

seen a table surrounded, not with children, but with olive plants.

Whoever, in the realms of common sense ever heard of olive plants round

a table? If, as Thrupp supposes, Nob was situated upon the Mount of

Olives, we can, without any conjecture, see a reason for the present

reference to a flourishing olive tree.—_C. H. S._

_Verse 9._—He compares himself (1) With an _olive tree_, a tree always

green, lasting long and fruitful, whose fruit is most useful and

grateful: so he paints his future state as joyful, glorious, lasting,

and useful and pleasing to men: plainly a reference is made to the

_royal_ and _prophetic_ office, in both of which he represents himself

as an _olive tree_, by supplying others with _oil_ through his rule and

instruction: (2) With _the olive_ growing luxuriantly, and abounding in

spreading boughs, and so spacious and large.... (3) But why does he add

_in the house of God_? That he might indicate, unless I am deceived:

(_a_) That he should possess a dwelling in that place where the _house

of God_ was, whence he was now exiled through the calumnies of Doeg and

the attacks of Saul stirred up thereby: (_b_) That he should perform

distinguished service to the house of God, by adorning it, and by

restoring religion, now neglected, and practising it with zeal: (_c_)

That he should derive from God and his favour, whose that house was, all

his prosperity: (_d_) That he, like a son of God, should rejoice in

familiarity with him, and should become heir to his possessions and

promises.—_Hermann Venema._

HINTS TO PREACHERS.

_Verse 1._—The confidence of faith. I. _The circumstances were

distressing._ 1. David was misjudged. 2. David exiled. 3. A bad man in

power. 4. God’s priests slain. II. _The consolation was abiding._ 1.

There is a God. 2. He is good. 3. His goodness continues. 4. Good will,

therefore, overcome. III. _The rejoinder was triumphant_, “Why boastest

thou?” 1. The mischief did not touch the main point. 2. It would be

overruled. 3. It would recoil. 4. It would expose the perpetrators to

scorn.

_Verse 3._—In what cases men clearly love evil more than good.

_Verses 7, 8._—The worldling like an uprooted tree, the believer a

vigorous, well-planted olive.

_Verse 8._—The believer’s character, position, confidence, and

continuance.

_Verse 9._—The double duty, and the double reason: the single heart and

its single object.

_Verse 9._—What God has done, what we will do, and why.

PSALM LIII.

The treasury of David, Volume 2 (of 6), Psalm 27-57 · 第 77 / 87 段