CHAPTER XIX.

_The Formula "No more."_

We sometimes express this as I have given it, and sometimes 188

thus, "Nothing more." For we do not accept the "No more," as

some understand it, for the examination of the special, and

"Nothing more" for that of the general, but we use "No more" and

"Nothing more" without any difference, and we shall at present

treat of them as one and the same expression. Now this formula

is defective, for as when we say a double one we really mean a

double garment, and when we say a broad one we really mean a

broad road; so when we say "No more" we mean really no more than

this, or in every way the same. But some of the Sceptics use 189

instead of the interrogation "No?" the interrogation "What, this

rather than this?" using the word "what" in the sense of "what

is the reason," so that the formula means, "What is the reason

for this rather than for this?" It is a customary thing,

however, to use an interrogation instead of a statement, as "Who

of the mortals does not know the wife of Jupiter?" and also to

use a statement instead of an interrogation, as "I seek where

Dion dwells," and "I ask why one should admire a poet." The word

"what" is also used instead of "what for" by Menander--"(For)

what did I remain behind?" The formula "Not more this than this"

expresses our own condition of mind, and signifies that 190

because of the equality of the things that are opposed to each

other we finally attain to a state of equilibrium of soul. We

mean by equality that equality which appears to us as probable,

by things placed in opposition to each other we mean simply

things which conflict with each other, and by a state of

equilibrium we mean a state in which we do not assent to one

thing more than to another. Even if the formula "Nothing 191

more" seems to express assent or denial, we do not use it so,

but we use it loosely, and not with accuracy, either instead of

an interrogation or instead of saying, "I do not know to which

of these I would assent, and to which I would not." What lies

before us is to express what appears to us, but we are

indifferent to the words by which we express it. This must be

understood, however, that we use the formula "Nothing more"

without affirming in regard to it that it is wholly sure and

true, but we present it as it appears to us.

Sextus Empiricus and Greek Scepticism · 第 19 / 34 章