CHAPTER VI

HOLYDAYS AND HOLIDAYS

If religion had done nothing else for mankind than insert holydays

into the year, which came to be holidays in the best sense of the

word, the health of mankind would have a great deal for which to thank

it. Humanity is deeply indebted for the breaks in the routine of labor

which came as the result of the institution of Church holydays of

various kinds and especially for the Sundays. That every seventh day

man should be free from labor was indeed a blessing. How few there are

who realize that the Sundays, taken together, fifty-two of them, make

seven weeks and a half of vacation in the year. Seven weeks of

continuous vacation are usually too much for most people to enjoy

properly; so long an interval palls on them. Coming once a week,

however, the Sundays are probably the most wonderful aid to health and

the conservation of strength and the keeping of people in good

condition that we have.

One of the things for which we find it hardest to forgive the French

Revolution is that when men tried to rule themselves by what they

thought was pure reason, they changed the observance of Sunday every

seventh day into a day of rest every tenth day. There seems to have

been no other reason for that except that the French were introducing

the decimal system, and ten seemed to be {121} the number that

appealed to them. Perhaps there was the feeling that seven was a sort

of mystical number often mentioned in the Scriptures and deeply

connected with religion. Their thoroughgoing reaction against the

mystical made them reject it. Seven is, however, a much better number

on which to regulate the day of rest than ten, and the seventh day has

been extremely valuable for mankind.

Practically every one who has thought about the subject has recognized

this, and yet it usually needs to be called particularly to their

attention to have people generally appreciate it properly. Mr.

Gladstone once emphasized the great benefits which he himself had

derived from it and which he felt ought to be accorded to every

workingman.

"Believing in the authority of the Lord's day as a religious

institution, I must, as a matter of course, desire the recognition

of that authority by others. But, over and above this, I have

myself, in the course of a laborious life, signally experienced both

its mental and its physical benefits. I can hardly overstate its

value in this view; and for the interest of the working-men of this

country, alike in these and other yet higher respects, there is

nothing I more anxiously desire than that they should more and more

highly appreciate the Christian Day of Rest."

Macaulay, the well-known English historian and essayist, emphasized

particularly the fact that the rest of Sunday, instead of proving a

detriment to mankind, was actually an advantage. During the war the

British had to learn that lesson over again. Men and women in munition

factories were at the beginning, owing to the high wages, but with the

full approval of the government {122} authorities, encouraged to labor

in the factories on Sunday as well as on other days in the week. It

was very soon found, however, that continuous labor, instead of

enabling the operatives to keep up a greater production than before,

was soon followed by a diminution in the power of production which

sadly reduced the output. The restoration of the Sunday rest was

promptly followed by an increased output, for nature seems to need

such a rest, or after a while there comes a lassitude and relaxation

of muscular power which actually prevents men and women from

accomplishing their tasks with anything like the energy that they have

under a regime of six working days followed by a day of rest. Only the

most menial of routine labor, requiring no thought for its

accomplishment, can be kept up without definite days of rest for

relief and recuperation of forces.

Macaulay declared: "We are not poorer but richer because we have,

through many ages, rested from our labour one day in seven. That day

is not lost. While industry is suspended, while the plough lies in the

furrow, while the exchange is silent, while no smoke ascends from the

factory, a process is going on quite as important to the wealth of the

nation as any process which is performed on more busy days. Man, the

machine of machines--the machine compared with which all the

contrivances of the Watts and Arkwrights are worthless--is repairing

and winding-up, so that he returns to his labours on the Monday with

clearer intellect, with livelier spirits, with renewed corporeal

vigour."

During the ages when organized religion had the power to regulate

human life much more than it has at the present time, there were many

more days of rest than the Sundays. It is surprising now to find how

many days {123} in the year there were on which the Church forbade

servile labor. All the Holydays of Obligation, so-called, were days of

rest. From the very earliest time in Christianity there were at least

two dozen of these in the year. The feast days of the Twelve Apostles,

for instance, were twelve holydays of obligation with no work, and

then there were of course nearly another dozen important celebrations

in honor of the Lord. Christmas, and New Year, the Annunciation on

March 25, Holy Thursday, Good Friday and usually two or three days in

Easter week, Whitmonday and, as time went on, certain feast days in

honor of the Mother of the Lord were added and then certain local

saints' days in particular regions, as for instance the patron saint

of the church of the place and often of the country. All together

there were some thirty of these Holydays of Obligation, that is one

extra day every two weeks and a little more than that was a holiday,

on which no work was done. As the vigils of all first-class feasts

were free from labor after the vesper hour, two in the afternoon, and

as no work was done on Saturday afternoons after the same hour, there

were actually well above one hundred days in the year free from labor.

One of the awful things that happened in the social order in modern

history was the obliteration of these holydays shortly after the

Reformation. We are engaged, now that we have waked up to the

necessity of working people having days of recreation, in putting the

holidays back into the year. We in this country have Lincoln's Day,

Washington's Birthday, Decoration Day, Independence Day, Labor Day,

and in most of the States Columbus Day, Election Day, and Thanksgiving

Day as well as Christmas and New Year. In England, in {124} order to

make up for some of the holidays that have been lost, or rather so

unwarrantably taken away from the working classes, they put in the

bank holidays four times in the year, having them occur on Monday

always, so that from Saturday afternoon until Tuesday morning people

are free from the obligation of laboring. We know now how wise, from a

human and merely natural as well as the divine and spiritual aspect

was the insertion of holydays in the year. We must have more holidays;

there should be at least one every month, and the old custom of having

at least one every two weeks would be much better.

There are not a few people, especially in our strenuous time, deeply

intent on human productiveness rather than on human life and

happiness, who seem inclined to think that so many holidays in the

year sadly hamper the power of humanity to get things done and,

therefore, represent a very serious waste of time. Those who think

that, however, are usually in quest of some personal advantage of some

very sordid kind and are not interested in the real achievements of

humanity. After all, human accomplishment, like personal advance,

depends not on how much we get done but how well it is done. It is not

from extremely tired, overwrought mortals, whose physical forces are

always in tension because of the almost continuous strain to which

they are subjected that we can ever expect to get any products that

are really worth while. Slave labor may be exploited thus, and it is

possible to build barracks and railroads and even pyramids in this

way, but to erect structures of any noble kind which comprise in

material form beautiful expressions of the artistic feelings of

mankind, there can be no rush of tired human beings, but time must be

taken.

{125}

The late Mr. Standish O'Grady of Dublin, to whom probably more than to

any one else is due the modern revival in Irish literature which has

been such an incentive for better poetry throughout the

English-speaking world, once discussed this question of the

achievement of mankind when men are released from the obligation of

continuous labor and are free to think and have the opportunity to

invite their souls and be inspired to higher things. It was at a

dinner here in America, and he was remarking the fact that every one

whom he met over here in this country was busy, _busy_, BUSY! They did

not apologize for the fact, as a rule, but on the contrary seemed to

be proud of it and to think that it must be the normal state of man to

be so occupied with what he was about that he was ever deeply intent

on it. He reminded his American audience that leisure was the

foster-mother of nearly everything that mankind had ever done that was

worth while, for the worth-while things must have thought in them, and

thought requires time and leisure for its fulfillment.

Mr. O'Grady recalled the fact that twice in the world's history when

men accomplished results so great that the world will never willingly

let die the monuments then created, the most important feature of life

was its leisure. Actually one third of the time of the men of Greece

in the Periclean period, that Golden Age of achievement, was spent in

the preparation for and the celebration of religious mysteries. Their

greatest architectural monuments were their temples; their finest

sculptures were the figures of the gods and goddesses, but what is not

usually realized is that their literature was the product of the

leisure afforded for competitions in their great religious festivals,

and their painting had a similar origin. The {126} Greeks, like the

medieval Christians, had a great many feast days during the year, and

on these they held games and contests of various kinds, not only

athletic but poetic, dramatic and literary of all kinds, for Herodotus

read his great history before the assembled multitude in the

celebration of a religious festival at Athens and was awarded a prize

equivalent very probably to ten thousand dollars in our time.

What was true of the Greeks was true also, as has been said, of the

Middle Ages. The generations which made the great Gothic cathedrals

which we have come to look upon as such triumphs of construction,

which built the magnificent abbeys and town halls and hospitals of the

later Middle Ages, enduring monuments of their genius in construction,

spent one third of their time in the celebration of and the

preparation for religious festivals. Twice in the history of the

world, once in the later Middle Ages and in the older days in Greece,

dramatic literature originated anew in religious mystery and morality

plays. The men who gave us Magna Charta and all the great charters of

liberties that lie at the basis of modern rights and privileges in

practically every country in Europe had the time to think out the

solutions of their problems in the leisure afforded by the fifty-two

Sundays and thirty Holydays of Obligation which they were accustomed

to celebrate. The undying literature of the thirteenth century, the

Cid in Spain, the Arthurian legends in England, the Nibelungen in

Germany and Dante all came at a time when men set apart days for

religious meditation and a contemplation of higher things than the

sordid concerns of everyday life.

So far from one day of leisure in three interfering with human

productivity in the best sense of that word, the {127} custom actually

added to it. Men who work continuously from day to day without

intermission can make a quantity of trivial things, but they cannot

make anything that would be enduringly interesting, for they have not

the time. I have often said that I thought that the greatest

expression in American literature is those famous words of Thoreau as

to the relation of time and money. The Sage of Walden found that by

working about one half a day in the week he could support himself, and

he used the rest of the time for the study of nature around him and

for inviting his soul in the woods and along the streams. He feared

that the business of making a living might keep him from really

living. It is easy to understand that his thrifty Yankee neighbors

failed utterly to comprehend any such attitude toward what they

conceived to be a workaday world. Especially at harvest time when they

needed help it seemed a shame to see Thoreau wandering apparently

lazily and aimlessly while they were working so hard and looking for

workers whom they were willing to pay what they thought was very good

wages. They stopped Thoreau and offered him better pay than they were

usually accustomed to offer, but Thoreau replied very simply, "I have

no time to make money." There seem to be a great many people in our

day who apparently are of the opinion that the only reason for which

time is given is to make money. The Sundays and holydays, as arranged

by the religious authorities, made excellent recreation days. After

their morning spent in church, listening to a sermon by some favorite

preacher, but having the eye and the ear and even the nose appealed to

by the rest of the celebration, the people were then free for

recreation. The old Church had no Puritanic scruples about people

playing on the {128} Sabbath; there were sports of various kinds on

the green in front of the church and their parish priest might be the

referee; neighboring parishes held contests in archery or at bowls or

in what the Irish call hurling and the English call shinney. At

certain seasons the guilds offered prizes for these contests; the

young were encouraged to go into training for them for weeks

beforehand, and the prizes were conferred rather gloriously before all

those whom the young folks most loved and respected.

These Church holidays were associated with various celebrations, such

as May Day, the Feast of the Innocents or Fools; the beating of the

bounds when in procession the parishioners on the Rogation Days walked

round the various properties of the parish and asked the blessing of

heaven on the crops; the carnival time when, before abuses crept in,

the Church encouraged the celebration that would mark the beginning of

Lent and make everybody ready to bid good-by to the pleasures of life

for a while. Then the various fairs and markets were usually so timed

that they immediately followed some important festival day in the year

and afforded people an opportunity for a little vacation and an outing

in connection with the feast, while at the same time they were able to

buy what they needed.

Above all, religion insisted that some part of these days of

recreation, the holydays of the years, should be spent not merely for

one's own selfish pleasure, but in bringing pleasure to others. It was

suggested, for instance, that there could be no better occupation for

a portion of Christmas and Easter or of some Sunday afternoons than

visiting the sick or prisoners or bringing consolation to those in

need. Kings and queens washed the feet of the poor on Holy Thursday,

and there were {129} similar practices at other times in the

ecclesiastical year. The people were encouraged to bury the dead

reverently and then to keep their graves green and to visit them

occasionally on the holydays as a sign that their memory had not

faded, though also as a reminder of the fact that sometime they hoped

to be with their dear friends in another world. This may seem a rather

solemn occupation for recreation, but taken in the open air, while the

children played around the graves and the old folks sat and tallied,

it was ever so much better than that unconquerable tendency to crowd

together in hot, dusty places which afflicts people on our holidays.

The old graveyards represented the parks in even the smallest towns,

and the inhabitants had a pride in keeping them in order and found a

pleasure in visiting them occasionally. In the unfortunately crowded

conditions in which they often lived, the only lungs for some of their

villages were to be found in the churchyard. There was scarcely a town

in this country two generations ago that had anything approaching a

public park, except its cemetery.

There is a constant tendency to encroach on the Sunday rest for

commercial and industrial reasons of one kind or another, and only

religious influences have saved the Sabbath for mankind. Even as it

is, the decadence of religion in many countries has led more and more

to neglect of the Sabbath-day rest, and in certain of the European

countries particularly, Sunday, instead of being a day of rest for the

small tradesman, is sometimes his busiest day. Here in this country

religious influences were the only factors that kept the saloons more

or less closed on Sunday and kept the rest day from being an orgy of

dissipation for many people. Selfishness continues to encroach on the

precious day of rest and various {130} forms of trade try to present

some necessity for their being open on the Sabbath. This has always

been the way, and the religious sanction in the matter has been the

most precious safeguard.

At the present time, there are a good many stores open for a while or

for the whole day on Sunday for which it is hard to find any

necessity. Some of the fresh food and milk stores have a certain

justification, but why tobacco stores should be open, seeing that

their product will keep perfectly and that any man can rather easily

lay in a store to carry him over a day at least, is indeed hard to

understand. [Footnote 5]

[Footnote 5: There are probably several hundred thousand men in

this country who have to work on Sunday because the tobacco stores

are open. This is an abuse corresponding to that with regard to the

saloon, which will almost surely bring about a reaction in the

public mind against the traffic in tobacco generally.]

Another abuse of the public confidence is the opening of all drug

stores on Sunday. As a consequence hundreds of thousands of men are

deprived of this day of rest in the week. Drugs are extremely

important and should of course be available at all hours, but there is

no more reason for all the drug stores to be open every Sunday than

there is for all the drug stores to be open all night. Certain drug

stores should be open, but as St. Antonius suggested five hundred

years ago, there is no good reason why there should not be an

arrangement by which the drug stores should be open in rotation on

Sundays, so that drugs would be always available and only the

absolutely necessary articles needed for emergencies should be sold on

that day. There is no reason at all why the modern department store

annex of the large drug corporations which happens to have a small

corner of its store space set off for the filling of prescriptions

should {131} do business on Sunday than for an immense department

store to put in a prescription department and then sell goods all over

the house because they have to keep their drug department open on

Sundays. Only the religious element in life will save us from this

commercial invasion, with the harm which it does in depriving so many

people of their day of rest.

The future of the Sunday as a needed day of rest is dependent more on

religion than on any other factor. The insidious selfish quest for

money will find excuses for the violation of the day in one way or

another. The institution and maintenance down the ages of the Sabbath

day of rest is a wonderful example of what religion can accomplish for

man in the face of the corroding power of selfishness and is the best

demonstration of its living influence for the bodily as well as the

spiritual and mental health of mankind.

{132}

Religion And Health · 第 6 / 19 章