CHAPTER X.

AN UNSETTLED ACCOUNT--A GUILTY DIRECTORY.

We now invite the attention of the reader to the account as it now

stands with the subsidy bonds voted by congressmen to companies in which

many who voted were stockholders and directors.

As the law stood prior to April, 1871, all railroad companies that had

received government lands were required to pay the interest once in six

months as it accrued. This interest had not been paid, and the secretary

of the treasury withheld, to apply on the accrued interest, the amount

earned by the different companies by the transportation of the mails,

troops, &c., for government. Congress, composed in part of stockholders

and directors in these same companies, passed a law ordering the

secretary to pay in money to the different companies one-half of the

amount thus earned, and left it optional with the companies to pay, or

not to pay the interest on their bonds. This they have not done, and the

interest account of these companies with the government stands about as

follows:--

Central Pacific, paid $ 527,025 Bal. due $5,841,351

Kansas Pacific, " 973,905 " " 995,448

Union Pacific, " 2,181,989 " " 4,779,763

Central Branch, U. P., " 15,839 " " 477,969

Western Pacific, " 9,350 " " 358,329

Sioux City & Pacific, " 826 " " 388,780

Making the total amount of payments the sum of $3,708,935, and the

amount that these companies owe government, as the accrued interest on

subsidy bonds, $12,861,640. This is the amount due in July, 1872. Add

the interest accruing since that date and these companies owe the

government not less than $16,000,000 interest on their bonds. This

amount, as well as future interest, and the principal of the bonds was

at one time secured to the government; but when congressmen and their

friends get a controlling interest in the companies, they procured the

passage of an act, supported by their own votes, which destroyed the

security held by the government, and relieved the companies of the

payment of this large amount of interest, thereby compelling the people

to pay it, while the stockholders, including some of the same

congressmen who had voted in favor of the act, received dividends on

their stock and on their _Credit Mobilier_ stock to the amount of two

and three hundred per cent; thus, by the abuse of the power vested in

themselves as members of congress, compelling the people to pay the

interest the companies should have paid, and pocketing in the shape of

dividends the money so dishonestly obtained. If we needed any further

proof to establish the fact that these Pacific railroads were in fact

congressional jobs, that members of congress were looking to their own

interests rather than to the interests of the people, we need but glance

at the interest account of the Sioux City & Pacific company. The excuse

pleaded of the "necessities of government," will not avail in this

instance. While the interest account of this company is about $400,000,

the account for the transportation of troops, mails, &c., over its road,

amounts to the sum of $1,642, one-half of which has been applied on the

interest account of the company, and the other half, under the act of

congress, has been paid by the secretary of the treasury to the company.

The conclusion is irresistible, that the personal interest of

congressmen, rather than the wants of the public, has controlled their

action.

Connect with the incorporation of railroad companies, and special

legislation in their favor, the legislation in favor of "Indian rings,"

"whisky rings," "patent right combinations," and the numerous other

kinds of special legislation, with the advantages presented to

legislators to make personal gain from all these sources, and we can

well understand why men are willing to spend such large sums to secure

an election to the United States senate, or house of representatives.

The baneful effects of the modern code of political morality are not

seen in the legislative department of the government only. The same

disregard of the rights of the people, and a determination to protect

and aid combinations in their efforts toward self-aggrandizement, made

at a sacrifice of those principles which are supposed to govern all

persons holding places of trust, honor, or confidence, seem to influence

to a great degree those holding high position in other departments of

the government. The acts of congress chartering the Pacific railroad

companies make it the duty of the president of the United States to

appoint five government directors for these roads. Under the statutes

these directors cannot own stock in the companies, nor have in them any

personal interest whatever. They are supposed to be free from any bias

for or against the companies: but they are appointed to represent the

government, and to guard against and report to the secretary of the

interior all abuses on the part of the companies, and at such times as

they are required to so report, to also make such suggestions as in

their opinion shall best subserve the interests of the public. It is

made their duty to personally inspect the roads, during their building

and after their completion. At least two of these government directors

must have a place on all important committees appointed by the companies

for the management and prosecution of their business. Any dishonesty on

the part of the companies in letting contracts for the construction of

their roads, or any misapplication of the grants made by congress, must

have been known to these five government directors, or some of them, if

they had properly discharged the duties imposed upon them by law. The

formation of an inside ring, under the title of "The Credit Mobilier of

America," composed entirely of the directors and stockholders of the

Union Pacific company, the letting of the contract for the construction

of the road to one of the directors of the railroad company, who was

also a director in the Credit Mobilier (and a member of congress), at

more than double its actual cost, the transfer of this contract to

certain trustees who were directors in both companies, in the manner

stated in a preceding chapter of this work, and the declaration of large

dividends on the stock of the companies at a time when the work on the

road was barely begun, and before any dividends could possibly have been

earned,--all these facts must have been known to the government

directors, and concealed by them from the government. When it is

remembered that some of these government directors were members of

congress at the date of the passage of the acts chartering the roads,

there is but little question that the same influences controlling them

in voting these large subsidies to the companies also controlled them as

government directors in their supervision of the roads. This conclusion

is strengthened on seeing that some of them became owners of stock in

the Credit Mobilier.

The same corrupting influences have been felt in other departments of

the government. The abuses practiced in the collection of customs by the

officers at the different ports of entry, as shown at the recent

investigations made by authority of congress, are but the natural

sequence of the questionable course of the legislative department. The

great frauds practiced by parties having contracts for furnishing

supplies to the Indian tribes are traceable to the same source. This

assumption by congress of the power to grant charters to private

monopolies, its unconstitutional interference in matters reserved to

state control, its determination to foster these gigantic corporations

by princely grants, with the corruption incident to these selfish and

greedy combinations, are the direct cause of the dishonesty prevailing

everywhere among our public officers, and besides other rank growth have

led to the imposition of burdens upon the people, oppressive to the last

degree. The controlling purpose of a large portion of those elected or

appointed to government offices seems to be to accumulate wealth without

regard to the propriety or honesty of the means employed. In their

eagerness to benefit themselves, all consideration for the public good,

or respect for their obligations as sworn servants of the people, are of

secondary importance. They accept office from purely selfish motives,

and enter upon their duties with the same object in view animating those

who embark in trade, manufactures, or commerce, viz: private gain.

Seemingly viewing the offices they hold as being their own private

property, they use them as the banker uses his money--for purposes of

speculation. Not unfrequently they permit themselves to be bought and

sold, like any other articles of merchandise. While we do not claim that

all public officers were pure prior to the legislative creation of the

monopolies we have been examining, we do claim that previous to that sad

departure, honesty was the rule, and not the exception. It was when

congress entered upon the business of chartering railroad companies,

donating public lands to them, and voting them money from the public

treasury, that the rule changed; and when, in addition, congressmen

became principal owners and directors in these companies, while still

retaining their seats in congress, they placed themselves upon the

record as unfaithful to their trust, and struck a blow at public

morality which will be fatal to our popular government, unless resisted

by the whole moral power of the nation.

And here we might well pause, and ask, what security have the people for

the continuance of republican government? These gigantic corporations

are in their nature anti-republican; they tend to a centralization of

power; they compel the people to submit to their demands; they are under

the protection of congress, under whose special legislation they are

permitted to disregard state laws; their ramifications extend throughout

the country; their artifices and money control the votes of the people;

they elect their friends to both the senate and house; they organize and

send strong bodies of men to the lobby of congress and state

legislatures, well supplied with money to obtain the passage of laws in

their interest, and to prevent such legislation as would be detrimental

to them, and in favor of the people; they have their friends and

emissaries in every department of the government, and throughout the

country, and they exercise a controlling influence not only at

Washington, but at almost all the seats of state government. The offices

filled by appointment of the executive and confirmation of the senate,

are too often the agencies of this same influence. We would not be

understood as saying that the president acts corruptly in these

appointments; we mean that the influences that secure many of the

presidential nominations are the same as used by these corporations in

the election of _their_ senators and representatives. The appointment of

judges of the supreme court of the United States has, in at least two

instances, within the last few years, been made through the influence

and in the interest of these monopolies. These corporations are also

represented in the cabinet. It is well understood that the removal of

Attorney General Ackerman, and the appointment of his successor, was

done by these corporate influences. The fact that the secretary of the

interior, to whom reports should have been regularly made of the

progress and condition of the Pacific railroad, was silent, while

private fortunes were being fraudulently taken from the public treasury,

proves that he also was under the same influence. It can be accepted as

an established fact, that all the departments of the government are to a

great extent controlled by corporations and combinations of speculators

whose interests are adverse to those of the people, and the result is,

that statutes are enacted, executive offices appointed, and decisions of

court rendered in the favor of these powerful classes, while the rights

guaranteed to the people by the constitution are disregarded.

The influence of corporations is also powerful in the administration of

state governments. While no such gigantic monopolies as the Pacific

railroad have been organized in any state yet, either by special

charters granted by state legislatures, or under general incorporation

laws, railroad corporations in large numbers have been organized, and by

combining their influence, have obtained control of most of the state

governments; they have been granted special and exclusive privileges,

and by the use of money and patronage have been able to control state

conventions, state legislatures, and state courts. As a logical result,

the people are taxed, while railroad companies are practically free from

taxation; subsidies to corporations are authorized and declared to be

constitutional, and the people are obliged to submit to rates of charges

for transportation of freight that amount to a confiscation of the farm

products of the country. We need not enter into a history of state

grants to railroad companies, for it is familiar to all; the same

corrupt practices incident to national, attend state, legislation. In

many instances, corporations have organized under state statutes, or

obtained special charters from state legislatures, located their roads,

procured local aid, and then obtained from congress land grants for

their roads, and have thus become powerful in the states where they are

located, while other companies have built their roads exclusively with

the means afforded by local aid voted under state laws, and loans of

money or sale of bonds; but in every instance so planning and contriving

that the entire road shall pass into the exclusive control of a select

few, leaving to those who furnished the local aid no rights or

privileges in connection with the company, or the road, save that of

paying extortionate freights and burdensome taxes.

Monopolies and the People(#39095) · 第 10 / 29 章