But Aaron answered that he would not hearken to them, and bade them

wait for Moses.

Then came a company of a thousand men, all armed, and said:

"Up! make us gods which shall go before us! As for this Moses, we wot

not has become of him."

At length Aaron, no longer able to refuse, said--

"What god will ye have to lead you?"

"Apis! the god of Pharaoh and the Egyptians, whom we and our fathers

worshipped in Egypt."

Then Aaron received from them the jewels of gold they had taken from

the Egyptians, and cast them into a furnace, and made an image of the

calf Serapis, and said, in grief, irony, and anger--

"This, and like this, is thy god, O Israel, that brought thee up out

of the land of Egypt!"

And erecting an altar before this image, these Israelites, not yet

weaned from Egyptian idolatry, burned incense and sacrificed before

it, and made a feast to the god, with music and dancing, as the

Egyptians do. At length Moses reappeared, sent down from the mount by

an indignant God, who beheld this extraordinary return to idolatry.

When the holy prophet saw what was done, he sternly rebuked Aaron, who

excused himself by pleading that he was compelled to yield, and that

he did so to show them the folly of trusting to such an idol, after

they had the knowledge of the true God. Moses took the calf they had

made, and made Aaron burn it in the fire, and he ground it to powder,

and made the idolatrous children of Israel drink of the bitter and

nauseous draught. Again he rebuked Aaron, and called for all who were

on the Lord's side, when several hundreds of the young men came and

stood by him. He commanded them to slay all who had bowed the knee or

danced before the calf; and in one hour three thousand men were slain

by the sword, in expiation of their sin against God.

Now, my dear father, my last letter must be brought to a close. Moses

informs me that the Lord, in punishment of this sin of Israel, will

cause them to wander many years in the wilderness ere He bring them to

the land promised to their fathers, and will subject them to be

harassed by enemies on all sides, some of whom have already attacked

them, but were discomfited by the courage of a Hebrew youth, called

Joshua, who promises to become a mighty warrior and leader in Israel,

and whom Moses loves as an own son.

In view, therefore, of this long abode of the children of Israel in

the desert, I shall to-morrow join a caravan which will then pass to

the northward, on its way into Syria from Egypt. It will be with

profound regret that I shall bid adieu to Moses, to Aaron, to Miriam,

and all the friends I have found among this wonderful people. Will not

the world watch from afar the progress of this army of God, which has

beheld the wonders by which He brought them out of Egypt? Doubtless,

ere this you have heard, by ships of Egypt, of some of the mighty

miracles which have devastated her cities and plains; and you will

hear, ere this letter reaches you, of the destruction of the whole

army of Egypt, with their king Pharaoh-Thothmeses, in the Arabian Sea.

Farewell, my dear father; in a few weeks I shall embrace you. We will

then talk of the majesty, and power, and glory of the God of Israel,

and learn to fear Him; to love, obey, and serve Him,--remembering His

judgments upon Pharaoh, and also upon His chosen people Israel when

they forgot Him; and, that as He dealt with nations, so will He deal

with individuals! Obedience, with unquestioned submission in awe and

love to this great and holy God, our august Creator, is the only path

of peace and happiness for kings or subjects; and the only security

for admission, after death, into His divine heaven above, "whither,"

saith His holy servant Moses, "all men will ultimately ascend, who

faithfully serve Him on earth; while those who, like Pharaoh-Thothmeses,

despise Him and His power, will be banished forever from His celestial

presence into the shades below, doomed there to endure woes that know

no termination, through the cycles of the everlasting ages."

Farewell, my dear father; may the Pillar of Cloud be our guide by day,

and the Pillar of Fire by night, in the wilderness of this world! With

prayer to God to bring me in safety to you, and to guard you in health

until I see your face again,

I am your ever affectionate son,

REMESES, PRINCE OF DAMASCUS.

[2] Exodus xxiv. 10.

APPENDIX.

A FEW WORDS TO THE EGYPTIAN STUDENT AND TO THE CRITIC.

There are necessary, perhaps, a few words to show that the author of

the preceding book has not arbitrarily employed facts, and made use of

traditions to suit a certain series of hypothetical events; but has

been controlled strictly by authorities.

Scholars, versed in Egyptian archæology, will do the author justice in

the plan and execution of his work; for minds, enriched with true

erudition, upon the history of the land where his scenes are placed,

will not only understand the difficulties which a writer has to

contend with, but appreciate what he has done. Captious criticism

will, of course hold itself wholly independent of facts; while

hypercriticism must be suffered to show its _quasi_ erudition. To fair

and manly scholastic criticism, whether from theological scholars, or

students in the "learning of the Egyptians," the work is open; and the

author will be grateful to any judicious and respectable scholar who

will kindly point out errors--proving them to be such.

The reader of Egyptian history is aware that but little reliance can

be placed on the assigned length of periods, which furnish us with

neither names nor facts, nor reliable monuments; because at this day

we have no control over the fictions and errors of historians. To

carry up to the first century of history a connected chain of

authentic chronology is not yet possible.

We have given due credit to MANETHO'S statements, but have little

confidence in many of his alleged facts, vouched as they are by

JOSEPHUS and HERODOTUS. The late discoveries by CHAMPOLLION _le

Jeune_, BUNSEN, Dr. YOUNG, LEPSIUS, and others, with the revelations

of actual historical inscriptions, have rendered the books of these

hitherto universally quoted writers nearly obsolete. The traveller of

to-day, who visits Egypt and can read hieroglyph, knows more of the

history of Egypt than MANETHO, JOSEPHUS, DIODORUS, HERODOTUS, STRABO,

or any of the cis-Pharaoic writers thereupon. As revelations are made

from time to time, we have to change our dates, revise our "facts,"

and reform our whole history of the past of Egypt, both in its

chronology and dynasties. In this work we have availed ourselves of

the latest discoveries, down to those of last year, by the celebrated

French _savant_, M. AUGUSTE MARIETTE, whose discoveries have, until

recently been made known only to the Academy of Sciences, France, in

modest and unpretending reports of his scientific researches.

As we have very thoroughly gone over the ground of Egyptian

archæology, both in its scientific and theological relations, we are

aware from what quarters attacks will be likely to come, if this book

is honored by the notice of scholars. But to such, we beg leave to say

that, while we may not have formed our work on the plan _their_ views

would have suggested, we have done so on a plan which is defensible;

for there are several schools of interpretation of chronology and

dynasty; and as we have chosen to abide by one of them alone, we are

ready to defend our position, so far as may be necessary to prove that

we are not ignorant of the subject we have attempted to illustrate.

The impartial scholar will see that we have endeavored to combine the

different, and often conflicting statements and opinions of the

mythology of Egypt, and to present a system which should represent the

belief of the Egyptian people at the time; and out of confusion to

create order.

In writing a book, the _time_ of which is placed anterior to the

language in which it is written, and even to the Greek and Roman,

there is of necessity the use of terms, which in one sense are

anachronisms, unless one actually makes use of the vernacular of the

Egyptians. For instance, the Greek form of names of gods and men, is

often adopted instead of the Misric, the use of which would be

unintelligible pedantry: therefore, Apollo, Hercules, Venus, Isis, and

Mars, are often written in our pages instead of the Egyptian names.

In order to show the general reader the variety allowable in Egyptian

names and dynasties, as well as chronology, we will append a few

examples:

According to one writer on Egypt, it was Amenophis who was lost in the

Red Sea. According to another, it was Thothmes III.; to another,

Thothmes IV.; and to still another, Amos I.; and to another, Osis!

Amuthosis is called by KENRICK (ii. p. 154), Misphragmuthosis.

Thothmes is also called Thothmeses and other variations. Osiris has

many titles and many legends, but we have adopted the popular one in

Egypt.

Sesostris is called Ositasen, Osokron, Remeses, and other names,

according to the interpretation of his cartouches, and other

inscriptions.

The pyramid of Chephren is called also Chafre, Chephres, Cephren, and

other designations, while Cheops has half a dozen appellations. A

writer, therefore, who seeks to present an intelligible view of the

manners, customs, religion, and polity of the ancient Egyptians must

decide what authority and what path he will follow; and having chosen

each, he should pursue it undeviatingly to its close. This we have

tried to do; and while those who might have selected a different one

may, perhaps, not coincide with our judgment, they will at least have

the candor to acknowledge that we are as much entitled, as scholars,

to respect in the choice we have made, as if we had made one in

harmony with their own peculiar views.

The question of "dynasty" has presented singular difficulties; but we

have mainly followed NOLAN and SEYFFARTH, leaving their guidance,

however, when, our own judgment dictated a deviation from their views.

When some chronologers of the highest character place the birth of

MOSES 1572, B. C. (vide NOLAN), others 1947 (vide SEYFFARTH), others

2100 years, others 1460, it is necessary that a writer, whose book

requires a fixed date, should make a decision. We have, after careful

consideration of the whole ground, adopted the era which we believe to

be the true one. The confusion attending the adjustment of the

Pharaoic dynasties to their true time, is well known to scholars and

admitted by all except those who have advanced figures of their own,

and expect Egyptian Chronology henceforth to be construed by them

alone. NOLAN (vide Book IV., Sect. iv.), has presented to our minds

the clearest exposition of the question; and we have followed, very

closely, his table of the dynasty of the Pharaohs between the eras of

Joseph and the Exodus.

The Biblical scholar need not be informed that Moses was forty years

of age before he interested himself openly in the Hebrews. Egyptian

history (see NOLAN) shows that in his thirty-fifth year, the

queen-mother, Pharaoh's daughter, died, and was succeeded by Mœris;

and as the Scriptures are silent, as to the occupation and place of

Moses in the interval, we are justifiable in placing him out of Egypt,

during the six years that followed, as we have done.

We desire here to acknowledge our indebtedness to the following

authors, whose works, either directly or indirectly, we have

consulted, and from which we have made use of such parts as served our

purpose; and not wishing to burden our pages with notes and

references, we here make our grateful acknowledgments to them, and

recognition of their works:

G. SEYFFARTH, A. M., Ph. D., D. D., seriatim, especially,

"Observationes Egyptiorum Astronomicæ, et Hireroglyphice descriptæ in

Zodiaco," &c., &c.--Leipz.

"The Egyptian Chronology Analyzed;" by FREDERICK NOLAN, LL. D., F. R.

S.--London.

"The Monuments of Egypt and Voyage up the Nile;" edited by FRANCIS L.

HAWKS, D. D., LL. D.

"Ancient Egypt under the Pharaohs;" by JOHN KENRICK, M. A. A work

which presents at one view the most complete illustrations of Egypt

extant.

To SIR GARDINER WILKINSON, D. C. L., F. R. S., &c., the writer is

indebted for much information respecting details of art, society, and

customs.

"The Philosophy of the Plan of Salvation;" edited by Professor C. E.

STOWE, D. D., by an anonymous author.

Dr. MAX UHLEMANN'S writings on Egyptian antiquities.

Rt. Rev. BISHOP WAINWRIGHT'S "Land of Bondage."

MILLS' "Ancient Hebrews."

LEPSIUS' "Discoveries in Egypt, Ethiopia," &c., and this eminent

author's other valuable writings upon Egyptian archæology and

antiquities.

STANLEY'S "Sinai and Palestine."

HENGSTENBERG'S "Egypt and the Books of Moses Illustrated by the

Monuments of Egypt."

Col. HOWARD VISE on the Pyramids.

J. A. ST. JOHN'S "Egypt and Nubia;" London, 1845.

"Antiquities of Egypt;" London, Rel. Tr. Soc., 1841.

ROSSELLINI'S works.

BURTON'S "Excerpts Hierogl."

J. C. NOTT, M. D., Mobile, to whose courtesy the author is indebted

for several valuable works illustrating ancient Egypt.

VON BOHLEN (Petrus).

BIROU, Roy-Soc. Lit.

"Description de l'Egypte," pendant l'Expédition de l'Armée Française,

1826.

LESUEUR, "Chron. des Rois d'Egypte."

Dr. ROBINSON'S very valuable researches.

BUNSEN'S "Egypten" and other writings, seriatim.

"DENON'S Voyage."

HERODOTUS, SOCRATES, DIODORUS, STRABO, PLINY, PTOLEMY, ERATOSTHENES,

PLUTARCH, and other Greek and classic authors who have written upon

Egypt, have been made use of by the author as sources of information,

and adopted as authorities so far as subsequent monumental

revelations have not lessened the weight of their testimony.

We are also under obligations to Professor HENRY S. OSBORN, for the

aid afforded in the Phœnician portion of our book, by his recently

published work, "Palestine, Past and Present," with "Biblical,

Literary, and Scientific Notes;" one of the most valuable and

interesting books of travel and research which has appeared for many

years, on the East: Challen & Son, Phil., 1859.

Besides the above, we have availed ourselves of numerous sources of

information accessible to the Egyptian student, to enumerate which

would extend this note to a catalogue.

We have sought in the foregoing work, to illustrate and delineate

events of the Old Testament, as in the "Prince of the House of David"

the New, so that they should "come home with a new power," to make use

of the language of another, "to those who by long familiarity have

lost, as it were, the vividness of the reality," and bring out their

outlines so as to convey to the mind of the reader a more complete

realization of scenes which seem to be but imperfectly apprehended by

the general reader of the historical parts of the Old Testament. The

work is written, not for scholars nor men learned in Egyptian lore; it

advances nothing new; but simply offers in a new dress that which is

old. The writer will have accomplished his object, "if his book," to

quote the words of Mr. STANLEY, in his preface to "Sinai and

Palestine," "brings any one with fresh interest to the threshold of

the divine story 'of the Exodus,' which has many approaches, and

which, the more it is explored, the more it reveals of poetry, life,

and instruction, such as has fallen to the lot of no other history in

the world."

The intention of the author in writing these works on Scripture

narratives is to draw the attention of those persons who do not read

the Bible, or who read it carelessly, to the wonderful events it

records, as well as the divine doctrines it teaches; and to tempt them

to seek the inspired sources from which he mainly draws his facts.

The author's plan embraces three works of equal size. They cover the

three great eras of Hebrew history, viz.: its beginning, at the

Exodus; its culmination, as in the reigns of David and Solomon; its

decline, as in the day of Our Lord's incarnation.

J. H. I.

End of Project Gutenberg's The Pillar of Fire, by Joseph Holt Ingraham

The Pillar of Fire; or, Israel in Bondage · 第 37 / 37 段