SIGNIFICANCE IN PARLEYS

The whole incident is full of significance. It is also full of

perplexity. With whom are the Russian representatives dealing? For

whom are the representatives of the Central Empires speaking? Are

they speaking for the majorities of their respective parliaments, or

for the minority parties--that military and imperialistic minority

which has so far dominated their whole policy and controlled the

affairs of Turkey and the Balkan states, which have felt obliged to

become their associates in this war? The Russian representatives have

insisted, very justly, very wisely, and in the true spirit of modern

democracy, that the conferences they have been holding with the

Teutonic and Turkish statesmen should be held within open, not

closed, doors, and all the world has been audience, as was desired.

To whom have we been listening, then? To those who speak the spirit

and intention of the resolution of the German Reichstag of the 9th of

July last, the spirit and intention of the Liberal leaders and

parties of Germany, or to those who resist and defy that spirit and

intention and insist upon conquest and subjugation? Or are we

listening, in fact, to both, unreconciled and in open and hopeless

contradiction? These are very serious and pregnant questions. Upon

the answer to them depends the peace of the world.

But, whatever the results of the parleys at Brest-Litovsk, whatever

the confusions of counsel and of purpose in the utterances of the

spokesmen of the Central Empires, they have again attempted to

acquaint the world with their objects in the war and have again

challenged their adversaries to say what their objects are and what

sort of settlement they would deem just and satisfactory. There is no

good reason why that challenge should not be responded to and

responded to with the utmost candor. We did not wait for it. Not

once, but again and again, we have laid our whole thought and purpose

before the world, not in general terms only, but each time with

sufficient definition to make it clear what sort of definitive terms

of settlement must necessarily spring out of them.

In our first year of war · 第 137 / 149 题