THE EVILS OF “DOUBLING UP.”

=On his return from a two-months’ trip to Europe, where he visited some

two-score prisons and correctional institutions, O. F. Lewis, general

secretary of the Prison Association of New York, has raised the issue

in New York City of the “doubling-up” of prisoners in cells. In an open

letter, published in interview form in several city papers, Mr. Lewis

says:=

“I have just returned from a two months’ visit to about forty prisons

in Belgium, Holland, Germany, England, and Scotland. In not a single

cell of the thousands which I saw did I see two inmates imprisoned. One

might say that the first principle of all in administering correctional

institutions in Europe and in Great Britain is that prisoners shall

never be ‘doubled up.’

“As for the situation in New York city on the night of September 10,

at the Jefferson Market district prison, in four cells two men were

sleeping, though only one cot was in each cell. In two instances the

men were sleeping, one at the head and one at the foot of the cot; in

two other instances, one of the men was sleeping on the floor. The

‘doubling up’ was occasioned by a lack of cell space for the male

prisoners. On the ground floor there is for male prisoners a pen with

bare boards, not separated off into bunks, where men sleep or try to

sleep overnight.

“In the night court for men on East Fifty-seventh street the prison

connected with the court was so crowded at 11.30 on that night that

in several cells five and six men were confined, so closely as to

forbid any of the men lying down unless on the floor. In one large

room sixteen peddlers, fined $2, were awaiting midnight to pay $1 then

remaining of their fine. The night keeper at the district prison stated

that the prison is frequently grievously overcrowded, that ‘doubling

up’ of three or four persons is common, and that on such nights as last

night it is necessary to pack prisoners into the various cells and

await the close of court, when the distribution can take place with

some alleviation, but with a continuance of the ‘doubling up’ system.

“At the Criminal Courts building there are so-called prison pens in

which persons not yet convicted are held often for hours pending their

appearance in some one of the parts of the Court of General Sessions.

Particularly on Fridays one of these pens, smaller than the cattle car

of a freight train is packed with from fifty to seventy-five persons,

mainly young men. No more improper or wretched preparation for a court

trial could, it seems to me, be imagined than this pen. Fortunately our

foreign visitors to the International Prison Congress last fall were

not shown this pen. Grand juries and the Prison Association have since

the first of the year frequently called the attention of the borough

president to this condition, yet it remains unchanged. ‘Doubling up’ is

of frequent occurrence in the Tombs. English law expressly provides

that such ‘doubling up’ shall never take place.

“We cast around for explanations of crime waves, increasing tendency to

criminality, and a growing disregard by young men in New York City of

the principles of law and order. I fail to see how any young man going

through the experience now daily undergone by hundreds of our young men

can emerge from New York City’s prisons without a vindictive attitude

of mind toward the city which maltreats him thus.

“The remedy is more money--more money for more cells and more prisons.

For some years a new workhouse has been contemplated. It is as

necessary to have an up-to-date workhouse as an up-to-date police

force. If we are to have a night court for men, to save the innocent

from overnight imprisonment, we must have a night prison which will not

condemn the guilty to intolerable conditions of imprisonment. If we

expect to reform our young criminals, we must provide a cell for each

prisoner. And if the city is really concerned with the reduction of

crime, its Board of Estimate and Apportionment must clearly recognize

that it costs money to reduce crime, and that one of its first

principles of useful imprisonment is separate confinement.”

The Review, Volume I, No. 9, September 1911 · 第 8 / 13 题