E. S.

To Mr. Moses Porter.

Portland, July 17, 1801.

I almost at this moment wish myself in your situation, meeting old

acquaintances, shaking hands with old friends and telling over with

renewed pleasure your College frolicks. I can almost see you convulsed

with laughter, hear you recount the adventures of the last year, while

imagination brings every boyish frolic to your view, unimpaired by time.

What a world of humour! what flashes of wit! what animated descriptions!

O these social meetings! How they animate and inspire one! how they

lighten the cares and multiply the joys of life! I wish you would write

me about Commencement. I heard yesterday that Sam. Fay of Concord

delivered an oration the 4th of July. I should admire to see it. I know

it must be very fine; in my opinion he is a man of excellent talents,

capable of writing on the occasion an oration that would reflect great

honor. The sentiments must be noble and generous. He possesses so much

feeling, there must be many glowing passages in it. If it is possible I

beg you will get me a copy and I will confess myself very, very greatly

obliged. Last night I attended the _Theater_,—“Speed the plough” was

performed, and I assure you very _decently_; the characters in general

were well supported. Villiers in Fannie Ashfield really outdid himself;

he threw off the monkey and became a good honest clown, and did not, as

he usually does, outstep the bounds of nature and all other bounds. Mrs.

Powell as Miss Blandford delighted us all. How I admire that woman! She

is perfectly at home on the stage, and yet there is no levity in her

appearance; she has great energy, acts with spirit, with feeling, yet

never rants; her private character we all know is unexceptionable. Mr.

Donnee as a young buck is very pleasing, he has a most melodious voice

in speaking, and has a very easy, stylish air,—good figure, tho’ small.

As for Mrs. Harper she is my aversion—for, as Shakespeare says, she will

“tear a passion to tatters, to very rags,” and she is too indecent ever

to appear on the stage. Harper is a fine fellow; he appears best among

the common herd of Players, and has as much judgment in supporting his

part as any one I ever saw, and even in comic characters I think he

excels Villiers. He has much greater resources within himself. Villiers

gains applause by distorting his face and playing the monkey, while

Harper adheres more strictly to nature. In Villiers we cannot help

seeing the player thro’ the thin disguise,—_Villiers_, not the character

he personates, is continually in our minds. S. Powell is contemptible as

a player (and I believe as a man); he puffs and blows so incessantly

that it is enough to put one into a fever to see him; he does not know

in the least how to preserve a medium, but takes a certain pitch and

there remains; he cannot gradually bring his passion to the height, but

he thunders it out without any preparation, and the unvarying monotony

of his voice is truly disgusting. I am sure, by his strutting and

bellowing, Hamlet would think _he_ was made by one of “Nature’s

journeymen.” But it is time to have done with players, for you will

think my head turned indeed if I rant about them any longer; but it has

served to fill up a part of my letter, and I assure you that alone was a

sufficient reason why I should give them a place. Society, bustle, and

noise frustrate all my ideas. I cannot write anywhere but at home. I am

ashamed that things of so little consequence should turn my head, but

’tis a melancholy truth. O you malicious fellow, don’t talk to me about

my favorite topic “female education,” don’t tell me of your

_philosophical indifference_! O Moses, you can’t leave the subject,

every word that could any way dash at it is marked. I believe you do

_itch_ to commence the attack. Well, rail on, you shall not say it is in

compassion to me that you desist. God forbid that your greatest enemy

should ever inflict so severe a punishment as to prohibit you from

speaking of your “favorite topic.” I fancy you have forgotten that it

_is_ such, _Mr. Indifference_. Your ironical letter has had a wonderful

effect, but perhaps not the desired one. I blush not to confess myself

contemptibly inferior to my antagonist. You ought to blush, but from a

very different cause; but I had forgotten myself, and was taking the

thing too seriously. I am not slow at taking the hint, perhaps my

presumption merited the reproof. I receive it and will endeavor to

profit by it; and pray, Cousin, how does Mr. Symmes’ coat suit you? His

“haughty humility,” his “condescending pride.” You have assumed the

habit, and I hope will ever clothe yourself with it when you meet your

_superior antagonist_.

You have a fine imagination and have pictured a chain of delightful

events which probably will exist there alone, yet I should have no

objection to your being a true prophet. We all can plan delightful

schemes, but they rarely ever become realities; but no matter, we enjoy

them in imagination. I expect from you a particular account of yourself

when you return. You will have many amusing anecdotes to tell me, if you

will take the trouble. I have just read your last and picture something

in it that at first I did not pay much attention to. You say all you

have said on the subject of education was merely the thought of the

moment, “written not to be received but laughed at.” What shall I

think?—That you think me too contemptible to know your real sentiments?

I should be very unwilling to admit such a suspicion, yet what can you

mean?—with the greatest apparent seriousness, you speak of the

_sincerity_ with which you conduct this correspondence. Was that

likewise meant to be laughed at? I had flattered myself, when I

commenced this correspondence, to reap both instruction and amusement

from an undisguised communication of sentiments. I had likewise hoped

you would not think it too great a condescension to speak to me with

that openness you would to a male friend. However, I shall begin to

think it is contrary to the nature of things that a gentleman should

speak his real sentiments to a lady, yet in our correspondence I wished

and expected to step aside from the world, speak to each other in the

plain language of sincerity. I have much to say on this subject, but

unfortunately my ideas never begin to flow until I have filled up my

paper. Do not imagine from what I have said that the most disagreeable

truths will offend me. I promise not to feel hurt at any thing you

write, if ’tis your real sentiment. But, Cousin, don’t trifle with me.

Do not make me think so contemptibly of myself as you will by not

allowing me your confidence; promise to speak as you think and I will

never scold you again.

A girl's life eighty years ago · 第 30 / 83 题