"A history of the secret doings, of all the horrors and crimes

perpetrated by this disgraceful institution, would fill up many

volumes, before the contents of which the most sensational novels

would appear tame and shallow. There is scarcely any sphere of

public or private life which is exempted from the irresponsible

control of this Inquisition of the nineteenth century. The verdict

of a Court has no value whatever for the Third Section. Not only

acquitted political offenders are as a rule transported,

administratively, to some distant town of the Empire, but even the

judges themselves, when they are considered to have passed too

lenient a verdict, are liable to be forced into resigning their

office, and to be then _exiled in company with the very prisoners

who had stood before them_!"

Lest this description should appear to be overdrawn, I may quote from

the letter of the St. Petersburg correspondent of an English journal,

which is certainly not unfavourable to the Government of Alexander II.

The letter was written after the recent proclamation of a state of

siege. And the writer says:--

"As proofs and instances, not so much of martial law as of the

repressive measures adopted (in many cases by ordinary

administrative agency, without the machinery of martial law), I may

mention that at the present time, as I am well informed, _more than

600 persons of the privileged classes are under arrest, to be

deported to Siberia without trial_. In one of the temporary

governor-generalships in the south of the Empire (Odessa), sixty

privileged persons have been already sent to Siberia without trial,

and 200 persons of this class are under arrest to be judged. So

great is the number of persons of this category to be escorted that

a practical difficulty is said to have arisen in connection with

their deportation. A noble, or privileged person, who has not been

judicially sentenced, when sent to Siberia by 'administrative

process' (as it is called, _i.e._, by the orders of the Third

Section, or Secret Police), must be escorted by two gensdarmes, it

being against the laws to manacle a privileged person who is

uncondemned. It appears that there are not gensdarmes enough thus

to escort the number of persons to be deported, and the Ministry of

Secret Police has, I understand, proposed to get rid of this

difficulty by sending the privileged persons fettered like ordinary

criminals.... The Third Section, or Secret Police, which is in its

proceedings essentially _extra leges_, claims to act independently

of any other department of the Empire. This institution, which lays

hold of suspected persons, whether justly or unjustly suspected,

and consigns them to Siberia at its pleasure, savours more of

Asiatic lawlessness than of enlightened European rule, such as it

must be the desire of all in authority to see established

throughout the Empire.... I have myself met with respectable,

honourable men, who have been arrested and imprisoned, in some

cases for a few weeks, in other cases during months, _followed by

years of exile in Siberia, without any charge being brought against

them_; and it is the possibility of this recurring to them, or to

others, that constitutes a Reign of Terror."

The above description is from the correspondent of the _Daily News_.

Clearly it is a very pleasant position to be a "privileged person" in

Russia. It marks its occupant, by preference, as a possible candidate

for exile to Siberia; the more cultivated classes being essentially

those which constitute the active element of political dissatisfaction.

Of the treatment of political exiles in Siberia, as it has been carried

on for a long time past, I have before me a thrilling description from

the pen of Mr. Robert Lemke, a German writer, who has visited the

various penal establishments of Russia, with an official legitimation.

He had been to Tobolsk; after which he had to make a long, dreary

journey in a wretched car, until a high mountain arose before him. In

its torn and craggy flank the mountain showed a colossal opening similar

to the mouth of a burnt-out crater. Fetid vapours, which almost took

away his breath, ascended from it.

Pressing the handkerchief upon his lips, Mr. Lemke entered the opening

of the rock, when he found a large watch-house, with a picket of

Cossacks. Having shown his papers of legitimation, he was conducted by a

guide through a long, very dark, and narrow corridor, which, judging

from its sloping descent, led down into some unknown depth. In spite of

his good fur, the visitor felt extremely cold. After a walk of some ten

minutes through the dense obscurity, the ground becoming more and more

soft, a vague shimmer of light became observable. "We are in the mine!"

said the guide, pointing with a significant gesture to the high iron

cross-bars which closed the cavern before them.

The massive bars were covered with a thick rust. A watchman appeared,

who unlocked the heavy iron gate. Entering a room of considerable

extent, but which was scarcely a man's height, and which was dimly lit

by an oil-lamp, the visitor asked, "Where are we?" "In the sleeping-room

of the condemned! Formerly it was a productive gallery of the mine; now

it serves as a shelter."

The visitor shuddered. This subterranean sepulchre, lit by neither sun,

nor moon, was called a sleeping-room. Alcove-like cells were hewn into

the rock; here, on a couch of damp, half-rotten straw, covered with a

sackcloth, the unfortunate sufferers were to repose from the day's work.

Over each cell a cramp-iron was fixed, wherewith to lock-up the

prisoners like ferocious dogs. No door, no window anywhere.

Conducted through another passage, where a few lanterns were placed, and

whose end was also barred by an iron gate, Mr. Lemke came to a large

vault, partly lit. This was the mine. A deafening noise of pickaxes and

hammers. There he saw some hundreds of wretched figures, with shaggy

beards, sickly faces, reddened eyelids; clad in tatters, some of them

barefoot, others in sandals, fettered with heavy foot-chains. No song,

no whistling. Now and then they shyly looked at the visitor and his

companion. The water dripped from the stones; the tatters of the

convicts were thoroughly wet. One of them, a tall man, of suffering

mien, laboured hard with gasping breath, but the strokes of his pickaxe

were not heavy and firm enough to loosen the rock.

"Why are you here?" Mr. Lemke asked.

The convict looked confused, with an air almost of consternation, and

silently continued his work.

"It is forbidden to the prisoners," said the inspector, "to speak of the

cause of their banishment!"

Entombed alive; forbidden to say why!

"But who is the convict?" Mr. Lemke asked the guide, with low voice.

"It is Number 114!" the guide replied, laconically.

"This I see," answered the visitor; "but what are the man's antecedents?

To what family does he belong?"

"He is a count," replied the guide; "a well-known conspirator. More, I

regret to say, I cannot tell you about Number 114!"

The visitor felt as if he were stifled in the grave-like atmosphere--as

if his chest were pressed in by a demoniacal nightmare. He hastily asked

his guide to return with him to the upper world. Meeting there the

commander of the military establishment, he was obligingly asked by that

officer--

"Well, what impression did our penal establishment make upon you?"

Mr. Lemke stiffly bowing in silence, the officer seemed to take this as

a kind of satisfied assent, and went on--

"Very industrious people, the men below; are they not?"

"But with what feelings," Mr. Lemke answered, "must these unfortunates

look forward to the day of rest after the week's toil!"

"Rest!" said the officer; "convicts must always labour. There is no rest

for them. They are condemned to perpetual forced labour; and he who once

enters the mine never leaves it!"

"But this is barbarous!"

The officer shrugged his shoulders, and said, "The exiled work daily for

twelve hours; on Sundays too. They must never pause. But, no; I am

mistaken. Twice a year, though, rest is permitted to them--at

Easter-time, and on the birthday of His Majesty the Emperor."

IX.

Can we wonder, when we see the ultra-Bulgarian atrocities practised in

Russia, that "Terror for Terror!" should at last have become the parole

of the men of the Revolutionary Committee?

I will not go over the harrowing details of the events of the last seven

or eight months; they are still fresh in every one's remembrance. The

only measures that could stay this destructive contest are

systematically withheld by the Czar, who will not permit the slightest

display of popular sentiments within the lawful domain of Representative

Government. Many years ago a distinguished French writer described the

Russian system as "a tyranny tempered by the dagger." Alexander, too,

himself is fully aware of this tragic concatenation of events. He is

even known to have often, in the very beginning of his reign, expressed

a feeling of fear lest his own end should be a violent one, like that of

so many of his predecessors. The attempts of Karakasoff and Berezowski

have lately been repeated by Solovieff. Whilst strongly condemning the

deed of the latter, even the Conservative _Standard_ felt called upon,

by the dangers of the situation at large, to make the following

comments, which possess a lasting interest:--

"It would be well if this painful incident could be disposed of by

a homily upon individual wickedness and individual perverseness.

Unhappily, it is but too certain that not only the deed itself, but

the peculiar circumstances attending it, are closely related with

the existing condition of a considerable section of Russian

society. We are obliged to add that this condition is closely

connected, in turn, with the form of government and the methods of

administration that prevail in that country.... In spite of the

emancipation of the serfs from the condition of territorial

slavery, the Russian people have made little visible progress in

the acquisition of political freedom. The Czar is still an absolute

Sovereign; his Ministers still remain responsible to no will but

his, and their agents have to answer only to their superiors for

the manner in which they exercise authority.... The sanguine youth

of the nation, eager for a career, and burning for activity, finds

itself debarred from any course of distinction save that of arms,

or that official existence which too often places men in Russia in

antagonism to their own countrymen.... The old method of

government--of police supervision, of private espionage, of

imprisonment, of exile, of political silence--has been tried, and

the result is discontent and extensive conspiracy. We fear that

even the confession of sensualistic atheism by Solovieff will not

prevent his memory from being cherished by thousands of his

countrymen. They will forget everything, save his desire to endow

them with more freedom. Whatever his faults, they will consider

that he perished in their cause, and _what they will be most

disposed to blame will be the unsteadiness of his hand and the

uncertainty of his aim_."

The _Times_ also, whilst pleading for Solovieff's execution,

acknowledged the fact of the sway of Czardom being rotten to the core,

in the following words:--"It cannot be disputed that whole classes in

Russia are penetrated almost to desperation with a sense of social

oppression and wrong.... A social condition like this is the natural

soil in which the brooding temperament which seeks a remedy in

assassination is nourished."

When all the safety-valves are closed, Nature takes its revenge, and

ever and anon occasions the inevitable outburst. Russia is at present

under a state of siege from St. Petersburg to Moscow and Warsaw, from

Kieff to Kharkoff and Odessa. An Army of Porters, about 15,000 strong,

must watch the streets of the capital, day and night; and policemen are

set to watch the watchers. Under General Gurko, the crosser of the

Balkans, who is now Vice-Emperor, the last lines of legality have also

been crossed--if the word "legality" applies at all to Russian

institutions. He is invested with unlimited powers, in the place of the

disheartened tyrant. The very Grand Dukes are under his orders. Arrests

among officers of the army have been the immediate consequence of

General Gurko's satrap rule. In several cases, compromising letters and

prints were discovered, and executions both of officers, like Lieutenant

Dubrovin, and of privates, have followed. The gallows are in permanent

activity. But perhaps the most significant feature--and a promising one

too--is the order issued, under court-martial law, that in all the

barracks a list of the soldiers' arms is to be drawn up, and to be

handed over to the police! This is the strongest sign of a suspicion

against the army itself; and on the army the whole power of Czardom

reposes.

When we hear of the arrest of a Senator, of a Director of the Imperial

Bank, of Professors, of the son of the Chancellor of the dreaded "Third

Section," of the wife of the procurator of a Military Court, of the

nephew of the Chief of the Secret Police, and many other such cases, we

are driven to the conclusion that, in spite of its furious acts of

repression, the autocratic system has become untenable--that it must

sooner or later fall. Like the Roman Emperor, Alexander II. might be

glad if revolt had but a single neck. But is it possible for him to

imagine that there exists but one party of malcontents? Do not the very

arrests just mentioned belie such an assertion?

Conspirators are laid hold of by the Czar's _sbirri_ together with men

who would not think of armed resistance. Despotism is frightened, in

fact, by the very shadows on the wall. Even the Slavophil and Panslavist

parties--still the ready instruments of aggressive policy--have both

become imbued with Constitutional ideas that look like sacrilege in the

eyes of the Pope-Czar. The revolutionists of _Land and Liberty_ ("Zemlja

i Wolja"); the Socialist Jacobins who follow the doctrines of the

_Tocsin_ ("Nabat"); the Nihilists, properly speaking; and the moderate

Constitutionalists, are all alike the enemies of the present form of

Government. In some districts the peasantry have risen; and, remarkable

to say, the first troop of Cossacks that was led against the insurgents,

refused to fight them. These are portents whose gravity cannot be

mistaken.

Ten years ago, when the Napoleonic Empire still stood erect, I said, in

an article on "The Condition of France," in the _Fortnightly Review_:--

"A mighty change is undoubtedly hovering in the air. There may be

short and sharp shocks and counter-shocks for a little while; but,

unless all signs deceive, the great issue cannot be long delayed.

The calmest observer is unable to deny the significance of the

electrical flashes occasionally shooting now across the atmosphere.

It is as if words of doom were traced in lurid streaks, breaking

here and there through the darkened sky. We are strongly reminded

of the similar incidents which marked the summer of 1868 in Spain.

Those incidents were then scarcely understood abroad; yet they

meant the subsequent great event of September. Even so there are

now signs and portents in France--only fraught with a meaning for

Europe at large."

This was published in December, 1869. In the following year, September,

1870, Bonapartist rule was a thing of the past.

Czardom, on its part, may play out its last card by embarking upon a

fresh war. It will only thereby hasten its doom. Though in Russia

concentrated action, for the sake of overthrowing a system of

Government, is surrounded with greater difficulties than in France, I

fully expect that the day is not far distant when Autocracy must either

bend by making a concession to the more intelligent popular will, or be

utterly broken and uprooted. "Terror for Terror!" is a war-cry of

despair; but on such a principle a nation's life cannot continue. The

moment may come when the Tyrant will be driven to bay in his own palace.

And loud and hearty will be the shout of freemen when that event

occurs--of the men striving for liberty in the great prison-house of the

Muscovite Empire itself, as well as of all those abroad who have still

some pity left in their hearts for the woes of a host of down-trodden

nations.

KARL BLIND.

FOOTNOTES:

[47] Russland unter Alexander II. Leipzig: 1870.

[48] "The day and night of the battle passed, and the sufferers received

no food or water, and their festering wounds were undressed. The

following morning the Russians entered and took possession, and made the

day one of rejoicing WITH THE VISIT OF THE CZAR AND THE IMPERIAL STAFF;

but this celebration of the event, however short it may have seemed to

the victors, was a long season of horrible suffering for the wretched,

helpless captives who stretched their skeleton hands in vain towards

heaven, praying for a bit of bread or a drop of water. Neither friend

nor foe was there to alleviate their sufferings, or to give the trifle

needed to save them from a painful death, and they died by hundreds; and

before the morning of the third day the dead crowded the living in every

one of those dirty, dimly-lighted rooms which confined the wounded in a

foul and fetid atmosphere of disease and death. It was only on the

morning of the third day that these wretched, tortured creatures had

been left to their fate, that the Russians began the separation of the

living from the dead."--_Daily News_ Letter from Plevna.

[49] There is a notion in this country that Herzen, at one time, was

banished to Siberia, and lived as an exile there. The idea is founded on

a book of his, published in German and English, under the title of "My

Exile in Siberia." Herzen, however, was never banished to Siberia, but

only interned for a time at Perm, which is several hundred miles from

the Siberian frontier, and later at Novgorod. There, as a Government

official, he had to sign the passport documents of those who were

transported to Siberia. He left Russia, and lived abroad in voluntary

exile when he wrote his works of Panslavistic propagandism under

Socialist colours.

THE FIRST SIN,

AS RECORDED IN THE BIBLE AND IN ANCIENT ORIENTAL TRADITION.

The idea of the Paradisiacal happiness of the earliest human beings

constitutes one of the most universal of traditions. According to the

Egyptians, the terrestrial reign of the God Ra, by which the existence

of the world and of humanity was inaugurated, was an age of gold, to

which Egyptians ever recurred regretfully; so that in order to convey

the idea of any given thing transcending imagination, they were in the

habit of affirming that "nothing had ever been seen like unto it since

the days of the God Ra."

This belief in an age of innocence and bliss, by which the career of

humanity began, is also to be met with amongst all peoples of Aryan or

Japhetic race, and was theirs anterior to their separation, the learned

having long agreed that this is one of the points on which Aryan

traditions are most plainly derivable from one common source with those

of the Semitic race, of which last Genesis affords us the expression.

But with Aryan nations this belief was closely linked with a conception

specially their own--that, namely, of four successive ages of the world;

and we find this conception attain to fullest development in India.

Created things, and among them humanity, are destined to endure for

12,000 divine years, each of which contains 360 years as reckoned by

men. This enormous period of time is divided into four ages or epochs:

the age of perfection, or _Kritayuga_; the age of the threefold

sacrifice--that is, the perfect accomplishment of all religious duties,

or _Trêtayuga_; the age of doubt or of the obscuration of religious

notions, _Dvaparayuga_; finally, the age of perdition, or _Kaliyuga_,

which is the present age, only to be brought to a close by the

destruction of the world.[50] The Works and Days of Hesiod show us that

precisely the same succession of ages was held by the Greeks, but

without their duration being calculated by years, and with the

supposition of a new humanity being produced at the beginning of each;

the gradual degeneracy, however, which marks this succession of ages is

expressed by the metals after which they are named--gold, silver, brass,

and iron. Our present humanity belongs to the age of iron, and is the

worst of all, although it began with the heroes. Zoroastrian Mazdeism

also admits this theory of the four ages, and we find it expressed in

the _Bundehesh_,[51] but under a form less nearly akin to the Indian

conception than was Hesiod's, and without the same spirit of crushing

fatalism. Here the duration of the universe is fixed at 12,000 years,

divided into four periods of 3000. In the first all is pure; the good

God _Ahuramazda_ reigns over his creation, in which as yet evil has not

appeared; in the second, the evil spirit Angromainyus issues from the

darkness in which he had up to this time remained inert, and declares

war against Ahuramazda, and then begins their conflict of 9000 years,

which occupies three of the world's ages. During the first 3000 years

Angromainyus has but little power; during the second, the success of the

two principles remains pretty evenly balanced; finally, during the last

age, which is that of historic times, evil prevails, but this age is to

terminate with the final defeat of Angromainyus, to be followed by the

resurrection of the dead and the beatitude of the risen just. The advent

of the prophet of Iran, of Zarakhustra (Zoroaster) is placed at the

close of the third age, or exactly in the middle of that period of 6000

years which is assigned to the duration of the human race under their

actual conditions.

Certain learned authorities--as, for instance, Ewald and M. Maury--have

striven to discover in the general order of Biblical history traces of

this system of the four ages. But impartial criticism must admit that

they have not made out their case; the foundations on which they have

tried to establish their demonstration are so entirely artificial, so

opposed to the spirit of the Scripture narrative, that they break down

of themselves.[52] And, indeed, M. Maury is the first to allow that

there is a fundamental opposition between the Biblical tradition and

the legend of Brahminical India or of Hesiod. In this last, as he

himself remarks, we see "no trace of a predisposition to sin transmitted

by inheritance from the first man to his descendants, no vestige of

original sin."

The Contemporary Review, Volume 36, September 1879 · 第 18 / 25 段