THE THREE FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF MY THEORY;

_Founded on the Leading Characteristics of the Horse._

FIRST.--That he is so constituted by nature that he will not offer

resistance to any demand made of him which he fully comprehends, if made

in a way consistent with the laws of his nature.

SECOND.--That he has no consciousness of his strength beyond his

experience, and can be handled according to our will without force.

THIRD.--That we can, in compliance with the laws of his nature by which

he examines all things new to him, take any object, however frightful

around, over, or on him, that does not inflict pain, without causing him

to fear.

To take these assertions in order, I will first give you some of the

reasons why I think he is naturally obedient, and will not offer

resistance to anything fully comprehended. The horse, though possessed

of some faculties superior to man’s, being deficient in reasoning

powers, has no knowledge of right or wrong, of free will and independent

government, and knows not of any imposition practised upon him, however

unreasonable these impositions may be. Consequently, he cannot come to

any decision as to what he should or should not do, because he has not

the reasoning faculties of man to argue the justice of the thing

demanded of him. If he had, taking into consideration his superior

strength, he would be useless to man as a servant. Give him mind in

proportion to his strength, and he will demand of us the green fields

for his inheritance, where he will roam at leisure, denying the right of

servitude at all. God has wisely formed his nature so that it can be

operated upon by the knowledge of man according to the dictates of his

will; and he might well be termed an unconscious, submissive servant.

This truth we can see verified in every day’s experience by the abuses

practised upon him. Any one who chooses to be so cruel, can mount the

noble steed and run him till he drops with fatigue, or, as is often the

case with the more spirited, falls dead beneath his rider. If he had

the power to reason, would he not rear and pitch his rider, rather than

suffer him to run him to death? Or would he condescend to carry at all

the vain impostor, who, with but equal intellect, was trying to impose

on his equal rights and equally independent spirit. But happily for us,

he has no consciousness of imposition, no thought of disobedience except

by impulse caused by the violation of the law of his nature.

Consequently, when disobedient, it is the fault of man.

Then, we can but come to the conclusion that, if a horse is not taken in

a way at variance with the laws of his nature, he will do anything that

he fully comprehends, without making any offer of resistance.

Second--The fact of the horse being unconscious of the amount of his

strength can be proven to the satisfaction of any one. For instance,

such remarks as these are common, and perhaps familiar to your

recollection. One person says to another, “If that wild horse there was

conscious of the amount of his strength, his owner would have no

business with him in that vehicle; such light reins and harness too--if

he knew he could snap them asunder in a minute and be as free as the air

we breathe;” and, “That horse yonder, that is pawing and fretting to

follow the company that is fast leaving him--if he knew his strength,

he would not remain long fastened to that hitching post so much against

his will, by a strap that would no more resist his powerful weight and

strength than a cotton thread would bind a strong man.” Yet these facts,

made common by every-day occurrence, are not thought of as anything

wonderful. Like the ignorant man who looks at the different phases of

the moon, you look at these things as he looks at her different changes

without troubling your mind with the question, “Why are these things

so?” What would be the condition of the world if all our minds lay

dormant? If men did not think, reason, and act, our undisturbed,

slumbering intellects would not excel the imbecility of the brute; we

should live in chaos, hardly aware of our existence. And yet, with all

our activity of mind, we daily pass by unobserved that which would be

wonderful if philosophized and reasoned upon; and with the same

inconsistency wonder at that which a little consideration, reason, and

philosophy would make but a simple affair.

Third--He will allow any object, however frightful in appearance, to

come around, over, or on him, that does not inflict pain.

We know from a natural course of reasoning, that there has never been an

effect without a cause, and we infer from this, that there can be no

action

[Illustration: LEG STRAP.]

[Illustration: MR. RAREY’S EXTRA STRAP.]

either in animate or inanimate matter, without there first being some

cause to produce it. And from this self-evident fact we know that there

is some cause for every impulse or movement of either mind or matter,

and that this law governs every action or movement of the animal

kingdom. Then, according to this theory, there must be some cause before

fear can exist; and, if fear exists from the effect of imagination, and

not from the infliction of real pain, it can be removed by complying

with those laws of nature by which the horse examines an object, and

determines upon its innocence or harm.

A log or stump by the road side may be, in the imagination of the horse,

some great beast about to pounce upon him; but after you take him up to

it and let him stand by it a little while, and touch it with his nose,

and go through his process of examination, he will not care anything

more about it. And the same principle and process will have the same

effect with any other object, however frightful in appearance, in which

there is no harm. Take a boy that has been frightened by a false face,

or any other object that he could not comprehend at once; but let him

take that face, or object in his hands and examine it, and he will not

care anything more about it. This is a demonstration of the same

principle.

With this introduction to the principles of my theory, I shall next

attempt to teach you how to put it into practice; and, whatever

instructions may follow you can rely on, as having been proven

practically by my own experiments. And knowing from experience just what

obstacles I have met with in handling bad horses, I shall try to

anticipate them for you, and assist you in surmounting them, by

commencing with the first steps to be taken with the colt, and accompany

you through the whole task of breaking.

Tachyhippodamia; Or, The new secret of taming horses To which is added The breaking, training, and taming horses · 第 68 / 93 题