CHAPTER XII.

What a Consul should be. — Turkish Oppression. — Official

Corruption. — Universal Venality. — The Moslem hates the

Christian.

On arriving in Benghazi I found a house prepared for me, by the

kindness of one of my friends, who gave up to me the only waterproof

rooms which, I believe, exist in the town. The sensation of sleeping

within walls, after three months spent under canvas, was not the

less agreeable from the circumstance that the rain poured down in

torrents, and only ceased for short intervals during my ten days’

stay. The second day after my arrival there fell a deluge of rain,

the effect of which was to wash down some thirty houses, while

there was not perhaps one in the place which had not suffered more

or less. This is owing to the houses being built with mud instead

of lime, which might be had at a very small cost. In the Frank

quarter some new houses were in process of building, and not being

roofed in, were more liable to suffer than finished buildings. As

I passed them the next day their interior literally presented mere

heaps of ruins. Year after year the same devastation is produced

by the same cause; the flat roofs, formed, as they are, of mats

laid over beams, with a heavy superstructure of sea-weeds and mud,

are never waterproof; yet such is the apathy, even of the European

residents, that they make no attempt to secure dry quarters for the

winter. One would think from their conduct that it had never rained

here before, and that the visitation, instead of being as regular

as the almanack, had taken all the world by surprise. In one house

I found workmen repairing fallen walls; in another, I heard that

the whole family had to sleep on the bales in the warehouse, which

admitted the water in fewer places than the other rooms. The streets

were in many places impassable from the ruins; and many houses were

literally melted away, the beams and stones remaining imbedded in

huge puddles of mud. It sometimes occurs, when the rains are more

than usually heavy, that the houses are in so menacing a state that

the whole town takes refuge in tents, where, though the ground be

damp, there are certainly no walls which threaten to overwhelm them.

I had the pleasure of finding the newly-appointed English

Vice-Consul, Mr. Werry, a gentleman well known to our officers who

served in the Syrian expedition. I was glad to offer him personally

my thanks for the ready politeness with which he had taken measures

to insure my safety while in the interior. Though he had only been

two months in Benghazi, he had already secured the good-will and

confidence of the British subjects for whose interest he is placed

there, as well as the respect of the Turkish authorities. During the

ten days I stayed in Benghazi he gave me frequent opportunities of

increasing my debt of gratitude to him. I regretted to leave behind

me, in so dreary an exile, one whose official experience, whose

activity, and familiar knowledge of all the Oriental languages,

would enable him to render essential services to his Government in

places of more importance. I do not by this mean to insinuate that

the presence of a British Consul in Benghazi is of little utility,

although the number of Europeans (they are nearly all British

subjects) be very small. Unconnected with trade, our Vice-Consul

holds an independent position, which those of other nations, fettered

by their personal interests, cannot attain, and he is thus frequently

able, in cases of gross injustice affecting the natives, to exercise

a salutary influence with the governor. His house is the ready refuge

of the ill-used slave and the oppressed Arab, and his exertions in

their behalf, rarely unavailing for them, give a prestige to the

name of Englishman, of which I more than once experienced the value.

This portion of the pachalic of Tripoli, in which I passed nearly six

months, is, like so many countries belonging to the Turkish Empire,

most bountifully endowed by nature with every source of wealth. Under

former rulers it was flourishing and populous, but it has now become

a waste; its scanty inhabitants are sunk in hopeless barbarism,

and even their poverty is no defence against the grasping avarice

of their governor—“Inter continuas rapinas, perpetuò inops.”

I do not accuse the present Sultan or ministers in Constantinople,

individually, of the tyranny and ignorance which render his rule a

curse wherever it is acknowledged; but—after seeing the fields of

Roumelia lying waste to the very gates of his residence, the cities

of Asia Minor depopulated, its mineral wealth a sealed treasure, even

the Arab glories of Syria faded, the palaces of Damascus crumbling,

and its marts deserted—the traveller cannot but long to see a

government changed whose oppression is less mischievous than its

neglects, and which tacitly permits wrongs greater than those which

it sanctions.[4] Well has it been said, that where the hoof of a

Turkish horse has touched the ground, there the grass grows not.

During the last twenty-five years, since the fall of the Janissaries

(which seemed to strengthen the central government while it weakened

the empire), there has been much law-making, and many abuses have

been abolished, as far as edicts can abolish deeply-rooted customs;

but the old spirit still breathes in the new régime, and injustice

and oppression are as frequent under the present Sultan as under his

predecessors. It is, indeed, no longer a matter of indifference to

the Grand Vizier, “whether the dog devours the swine or the swine

the dog.” A wholesome fear of European opinion has succeeded

to undisguised contempt; but the Turk of the people is still in

his own eyes the first of human beings; his Sultan is still the

suzerain before whom all kings bow, and at whose orders the French

and English krals send their fleets and troops to chastise the

rebellious Egyptian or Muscovite; and in the remoter provinces,

which are beyond the immediate eye of the Elehi Beys, as they call

the foreign ambassadors, the old system of peculation and robbery

exists in full force.

Much has been written in praise of the new organisation of the

Turkish Government, and the Tanzimat, as the regulations for the

service are called; but the good which this contains is for the

most part evaded or neglected. The most real result of the reform

has been to introduce a number of new functionaries, or, in other

words, to increase the points of contact between the governors and

the governed, whereby more frequent opportunities of peculation

are given to the former. The sanitary regulations, so ridiculous

in the way they are enforced and the way they are neglected, are

one instance of this; another is the prohibition of presents from

inferiors to superiors, which all employés take an oath to observe;

yet it would not be easy to find ten per cent. of the higher officers

who are insensible to, or unwilling to accept such an argument. In

trifling things they are, of course, careful to wear the mask of

austere virtue, as Izzet Pacha, the Governor of Tripoli, lately

recalled on the complaints of the French Government, showed, when

he was here in summer. A merchant of the place sent him a basket of

grapes, when they were still scarce, and he returned them, saying,

that, according to his oath, he must either pay for or refuse

them. Yet this is the man who, after keeping an Arab sheikh in

prison for many months, released him on receiving 150,000 piastres,

about £1500; and whose sons, youths of eighteen and twenty years,

established in their father’s pachalic a trade in all the produce

of the country, which amounted to a virtual monopoly. The European

merchants sent a remonstrance on this subject to Constantinople,

and they received an answer, in the advancement of the elder of

these enterprising young tradesmen to the dignity of Mirabi, or

pacha of one tail.

After the last harvest the cultivators of the soil complained

that the tithe in kind due to Government was taken in such a

way as to amount to nearly one-half of the entire produce. This

had been contrived by Izzet Pacha’s son and some of the local

authorities; the tenth only being carried to the public account,

and the remainder divided among themselves. Many representations

to this effect were made to the French consular agent, who, after

obtaining satisfactory evidence of their truth, reported the case to

his superior in Tripoli. Not long afterwards, on some dispute with

the Pacha, the Consul brought this up as a proof of the malversation

of the subordinates, on which the other pretended great indignation,

and insisted that he and the Consul should send to Benghazi for

information. The books were, of course, in good order; the witnesses,

on whose testimony the Consul had relied, were by threats reduced

to silence; the charge could not be substantiated (the Bey who was

judge being himself the chief delinquent); and the upshot of the

inquiry was, that the Vice-Consul had to make apologies for the

slander, while he and every Frank in the place knew the truth of

the accusation, and could point out the magazines where the grain

thus extorted was deposited. Many weeks had not passed after this

when ships belonging to the Pacha’s son arrived in the port,

and openly loaded with this very corn on his account.

When a pacha acts thus, we cannot wonder if his subordinates imitate

so good an example; and the director of the customs may be praised

for the honesty which consigns about three-fourths of their produce

to the treasury. An Arab said to me one day, on this subject, “The

Pacha eats, the Bey eats, and the Gumruckdjy (director of customs)

eats,” each buying his superior’s silence with a share of his own

peculations; the friends who protect his interests at Constantinople

coming in for their share of the pacha’s profits. A Turk is, in

fact, capable of learning many things; he may be _civilisé_—a

Frank word, now adopted in Turkish; he may cease to be what _La

Jeune Turquie_ calls a fanatic; he will indulge in deep potations,

or abstain from fasting in Ramadhan; but he will never learn not to

eat (Italicè _magnare_) when he can. His appetite and digestion,

in this sense, are truly ostrich-like. On inquiring into the truth

of the Bey’s statement that there are 1200 houses in Benghazi,

I learned that there are, in fact, 1400, the two hundred which are

suppressed in the official account being “eaten” by the Bey

and the Sheikh-el-belid.

An amusing instance of the ruses to which a scrupulous man, who has

the fear of his oath before his eyes, will resort, was related to

me by one who was in the town at the time it occurred. An Armenian

addressed himself to a Pacha in Anadoly, for the decision of a

lawsuit in his favour; and, after stating his case, produced a

bag well filled with the usual arguments, which he offered to his

Excellency. On this the great man, who had listened to his statement

with the blandest smiles, drew himself up, frowning in anger, and

only answered, “Infidel, be off!” The poor Armenian, astonished

at the reception of his well-meant offering, begged and prayed,

and seemed to weigh the bag in his hands, that the Pacha might

see how heavy it was—all Spanish dollars; but the only answer he

obtained was a fresh order to be off, with the surly addition, “He

is an infidel who gives, and an infidel who takes”—disobedience

to the Sultan’s laws being rebellion, and rebellion, according

to Turkish doctrine, infidelity. Disappointed and crest-fallen,

the poor Armenian withdrew from the presence, and was not a little

surprised to find himself the object of the congratulations of the

attendants and cavasses in the anteroom. “It is useless,” he

said, “to ask me for backshish; for the Pacha has rejected my suit,

and that, too, with hard words.” “What answer is this?” said

they; “did you not hear his words—‘the infidel gives and the

infidel takes?’ Go to the steward; is not he also an Armenian?”

One of the greatest blots on the Turkish constitution has not been

touched by the Tanzimat: it is that provision of the Moslem law

which excludes the reception of evidence given by persons of other

religions against a Moslem. Twenty witnesses may depose to the

murder of a Christian or Jew by a Turk; but, as was too clearly

shown in the case of Sir Lawrence Jones, if there be not among

them at least two Moslemin, their testimony is unavailing; while

to obtain Moslem witnesses to prove an outrage on a Christian is

impossible.[5] An Arab was wantonly beating a Maltese boy, a few

days ago, in the bazaar, when a respectable Moslem came to his

assistance; a third then came up, and apostrophised the boy’s

defender, saying, “Are you a Moslem? and do you take the part of

a Christian against a believer?” He spoke what all the spectators

felt. Until this odious distinction be abolished, there can be no

security either for the life or property of Christian rayahs or

foreigners, excepting in the energy and privileges of the consuls;

and the representatives of the great powers seem at present disposed

to yield the greater part of their own rights and the immunities

of their fellow-subjects. These were wisely considered essential

to the welfare or consideration of foreigners among a people who,

though little less than barbarians, look with the most profound

contempt upon a Frank; and those who renounce their enjoyment are,

I fear, too precipitate in their favourable judgment of the real

state of the Turkish Empire.

I cannot close my notes of the Cyrenaica without adding that I spent

there (occasional annoyances excepted) some most pleasant months;

I came to the country an invalid, and was exceedingly unwell when I

started for Grennah; but its pure air and lovely scenery restored

me to perfect health. For those who seek summer quarters in the

Mediterranean, I again repeat to them my former advice, to choose the

pleasant solitudes of Cyrene in preference to the Syrian hills, where

so much sickness and mortality prevail. I have been many times in

the Lebanon, and the rich beauty of Damascus has greater charms for

me than that of any city I have seen; but, still, I have never been

there without witnessing or feeling the effects of the pestilential

air, which, every autumn, produces fatal fevers and dysenteries. Even

in quitting its shores the evil spirit seems to pursue its victims;

and I have seen more than one friend seized with the deadly Syrian

fever weeks after he had reached a healthier climate.

Wanderings in North Africa · 第 12 / 20 章