_April 21, 1809._ _The Comforts of Matrimony. A Good Toast._ Published

by Reeve and Jones.--The picture represents a scene of domestic

felicity of the most touching completeness. The husband is browning

a muffin for tea; his wife's arm is wound round his neck during this

delicate operation; his children are enjoying their peaceful meal; an

infant is tranquilly slumbering in the cradle; and a cat, surrounded by

her family of kittens, carries out the unity of the subject. Another of

the series partly published in 1808, in which a rude facsimile of the

original drawings has been attempted, without much success.

_The Tables Turned. Miseries of Wedlock._ A pendant to the

preceding.--The domestic horizon is clouded by storms. The late happy

pair are only kept from demolishing each other by the table placed

between them, which is being wrecked in the struggle. The wife, in a

fury, is holding on to her husband's hair with all her force, while

he has a firm grasp of his unfortunate spouse's head, at which he is

aiming a pewter-pot; children, chairs, crockery, cutlery, and food,

are alike devoted to destruction; the infants are frantic, and general

misery prevails. The execution of these subjects is commonplace, and

the engraver has not done justice to the originals.

_April 29, 1809._ _Oh! you're a Devil. Get along, do!_ Published by

Reeve and Jones, 7 Vere Street, New Bond Street.--A dashing young

officer, a gallant adventurer, probably crippled with debts, and with

nothing but his commission to support his extravagances, is laying

ardent siege to the ordinary person of a rich dowager, fat, _not_ fair,

and decidedly forty; indeed, the lady is more than old enough to be the

mother of her insidious admirer, who is probably looking forward to

the possession of the foolish inamorata's fortune to 'whitewash' his

liabilities, and exchange him from one slavery to another; preferring

the fetters of Hymen to the captivity of a debtor's prison. The lady,

a vain piece of antiquated and frivolous vulgarity, is loaded with

massive jewellery, which her hopeful lover no doubt looks forward

to melting for his own purposes, after he has staked the relict's

money-bags on the gambling-table; her feathers are profuse, and she

wears a boa of an extinct kind, famous in the annals of contemporary

fashions, known as a _rattle-snake_.[10]

_June 20, 1809._ _A Tit-bit for a Strong Stomach._

_July 31, 1809._ _The Huntsman Rising. The Gamester going to bed._

Published by T. Rowlandson, 1 James Street, Adelphi. (See 1811.)

1809. _Rowlandson's Caricatures upon the Delicate Investigation, or the

Clarke Scandal_ (Mrs. Mary Anne Clarke and the Duke of York).--In order

to make the caricatures, published by Rowlandson, on the Clarke scandal

intelligible, it is desirable to recapitulate the circumstances, which

are given in condensed form from the writer's 'Life of James Gillray

the Caricaturist.'[11]

[Illustration: OH! YOU'RE A DEVIL. GET ALONG, DO!]

George the Third's darling son, the favourite Frederick, on whom he

doted, and who was so popular out of doors that he was hailed as 'the

soldier's friend'--a compliment which no soldier would be likely to

utter concerning a commander who had not taken the right method to

render himself the object of general affection--began to attract

unenviable notoriety at the beginning of 1809. On January 27 Colonel

Wardle charged the Duke with corrupt administration of the Half-Pay

Fund, the sole control of this provision having been vested in the

Commander-in-Chief.

The produce of the fund arose from the sale of commissions fallen in

by the death or dismissal of officers in the army, and amounts thus

realised were applied to the purchase of commissions for meritorious

officers, and other beneficial purposes.

Colonel Wardle stated he should prove that the Duke of York had a

mistress, Mrs. Clarke, living in great splendour in Gloucester Place,

from 1803 to 1806. This lady had a scale of prices for the sale of

commissions, and he would lay before the House Mrs. Clarke's prices and

the Regulation prices.

Mrs. Clarke's Regulation

Prices. Prices.

A Majority £900 £2,600

A Company 700 1,500

A Lieutenancy 400 550

An Ensigncy 200 400

Every sale effected by Mrs. Clarke was a loss to the Half-Pay Fund of

the difference between her price and the Regulation price. He then made

a statement of a list of sales effected by her, the sums paid, the

names and ranks of the officers, a list of exchanges, &c.

Her patronage, it was stated, extended also to ecclesiastics. He moved

for a Committee of the whole House to investigate the subject. The

motion was agreed to, and the witnesses were ordered to be summoned.

On February 1, Mrs. Clarke stood at the bar of the House--a lovely

Thaïs, eminently self-possessed, armed with ready wit, and with charms

of person and address which dazzled the gravest members. She contrived

to turn all questions put to her with the object of giving annoyance,

or for her degradation, into the means of exposing the Duke of York,

who, it appears, had withdrawn his 'protection,' stipulating to pay her

an annuity of 400_l._ per annum, which had been suffered to fall into

arrears, and her applications for payment had been met with threats of

the 'pillory' and the 'Bastille.'

Wilberforce, who, as we have seen, had been active in bringing

forward the impeachment of Lord Melville, for corruption in his

office, when at the Admiralty, as far as misappropriation of the Navy

Fund was concerned; and Whitbread, who, as a leader of the Radical

Reformers, was foremost in exposing state intrigues and corruptions at

Court--were active in bringing forward and proving the case against the

Commander-in-Chief.

Wilberforce has made the following entry in his diary, touching the

investigation before the Parliamentary Committee: 'This melancholy

business will do irreparable mischief to public morals, by accustoming

the public to hear without emotion shameless violations of decency. The

House examining Mrs. Clarke for two hours, cross-examining her in the

Old Bailey way, she, elegantly dressed, consummately impudent and very

clever, got clearly the better of the tussle.'

Two officers who endeavoured to shield their chief during the

investigation by giving evidence contrary to the truth, were committed

to Newgate for equivocation.

After an examination which lasted some while, during which facts

damaging to both sides were elicited, while Mrs. Clarke's allegations

remained unshaken in the main, Colonel Wardle summed up the evidence,

and concluded by moving 'that the Duke of York had been guilty of

corrupt practices and connivance. He accordingly prayed for his

dismissal from the command of the army.'

Mr. Banks moved an amendment acquitting the Duke of York of personal

corruption, but petitioning the King to remove him for gross

irregularities and negligence.

Mr. Percival moved and carried a resolution absolving the Duke of all

personal corruption or criminal connivance.

It was evident that the resignation of the Commander-in-Chief would

alone stop further proceedings. Wilberforce and his party succeeded in

forcing him to retire from the command of the army, and the inquiry was

dropped.

Sir David Dundas succeeded the Duke of York, and after holding the

appointment for two years, resigned, and the Duke was reinstated.

Mrs. Clarke was not appeased by the results of the parliamentary

investigation, which had, in fact, effected nothing for her, and

all for others. These disgraceful exposures would have been escaped

if the Duke had paid her annuity. Her motives in the matter were of

course entirely personal; the public were on her side, and she made

the notoriety serve her purpose. She announced a _Memoir of her Life_,

and of her transactions with the Duke of York, accompanied by a series

of his letters; these latter would have been eagerly read, the fervid

specimens which came out in the course of the investigation were

republished, versified, and circulated in various forms, to the delight

of the public. The consequences, and the ridicule apprehended from

this exposure, effected the purpose which a mere regard for good faith

could not accomplish: negotiations were opened for the suppression

and destruction of these memoirs, which were said to be actually in

print. An indemnity of 7,000_l._ is believed to have secured Mrs.

Clarke's silence, and the annuity of 400_l._ was guaranteed her for

life. This outline of the facts will be found substantially followed

by the caricaturist's series, although the details differ in certain

respects from over-colouring inseparable from satirical versions. Mrs.

Clarke[12] stated that she had been under the protection of the Duke of

York since the years 1802 or 1803, but her establishment in Gloucester

Place did not commence till 1804; it consisted of two carriages, eight

horses, nine men servants, &c., to defray the expenses of which the

Duke allowed her 2,000_l._ per annum, to be paid monthly. That she

had also a small establishment at Weybridge; the house belonged to

His Royal Highness. That the sums she received from the Duke were

barely adequate to pay the servants their wages and liveries; and

when she informed him of it, he replied that 'if she were clever, she

would not ask him for money.' That the applications for her interest

in military promotions were very numerous; she mentioned them to His

Royal Highness, who told her which were likely to be successful. At one

period she had a long list of applicants, procured either by Captain

Sandon or Mr. Donovan, which she gave his Royal Highness, who said

he would procure the appointments by degrees; she stated to him at

the same time the sums which she should receive for her interest in

procuring them; that the appointment of Mr. Dowler to the Commissariat

was through the influence of the Duke of York, who knew that she was to

receive 1,000_l._ for it. That two applications were made through the

medium of Mr. Donovan, for promotions in the Church, one for a deanery,

the other a bishopric; and Dr. O'Meara, who expected one of them,

applied to her for a letter of introduction to His Royal Highness. That

the Duke was fully acquainted with the extent of her establishment as

he visited her every day; paid some incidental debts which she had

incurred; but, at the time of separation, had not made any advances of

cash for three months, and, in consequence, left her involved more than

2,000_l._ in debt. She resided in Gloucester Place about three years.

Mrs. Clarke also stated that she obtained for Major Shaw the

appointment of Deputy Barrack-Master-General of the Cape of Good Hope,

for which he was to pay her 1,000_l._; she, however, only received

500_l._, and, on complaining to His Royal Highness, he warned her to

be more careful, and not to suffer herself to be duped again, adding

that he would put Major Shaw on half-pay. Major Shaw sent her several

letters in consequence, complaining of being put upon half-pay, but she

paid no attention to them.

Mrs. Clarke also stated that she had in her service as footman, a young

man, named Samuel Carter; he lived with her about twelve months, and

was in the habit of attending upon her when in company with the Duke of

York. She at length obtained for him a commission in the 16th Foot, by

applying to the Duke, who conversed with him on the occasion. At the

time of the investigation he was a staff officer in the West Indies.

Carter was recommended to her by Captain Sutton, and was indebted to

her alone for his commission.

It appeared from later disclosures that this Carter, who was by

no means a person without education, was the natural son of the

deceased Captain Sutton, a most meritorious officer, and a personal

friend of the Prince's, and that his son's appointment was an act of

well-deserved benevolence. Carter's age at the date of his appointment

was, according to Mrs. Clarke's account, about eighteen, but on account

of his short stature he looked a mere boy.

Mrs. Clarke was asked whether she intended to abide by the statement

of her having pinned up at the head of the bed a list of the friends

whom she wished to be promoted, and which list the Duke of York took

away? She answered affirmatively, and said that His Royal Highness

took it down the second morning, drew up the curtain, and read it. She

afterwards saw it in His Royal Highness's pocket-book, with scratches

through several of the names of those who had been promoted.

Miss Mary Ann Taylor, who was in the habit of visiting Mrs. Clarke,

when she was under the Duke's protection, very frequently, stated that

she heard the Duke of York speak to Mrs. Clarke about Colonel French's

levy, and that what passed, as nearly as she could recollect, was as

follows. 'I am continually worried by Colonel French. He worries me

continually about the levy business, and is always wanting something

more in his own favour.' Turning then to Mrs. Clarke (Miss T. thinks),

he said, 'How does he behave to you, darling?' or some such kind words

as he was wont to use. Mrs. Clarke replied, 'Middling; not very well;'

on which the Duke said, 'Master French must mind what he is about, or I

shall cut him up and his levy too!'[13]

Large sums, it is certain, had been supplied by the Duke to his

mistress--upwards of 5,000_l._ in notes, and in payments to tradesmen

for wine, furniture, and a variety of articles, to the amount, in the

whole, of between 16,000_l._ and 17,000_l._, and all within the space

of little more than two years. The extent of Mrs. Clarke's debts was

likewise to be considered.[14]

_Mrs. Clarke's Memoirs._--Mrs. Clarke called on Sir Richard Phillips

for the purpose of making some arrangement respecting the publication

of her _Memoirs_; this offer was declined for several reasons of a

private and political nature: the unqualified reproaches to which

Sir Richard Phillips had lately been exposed had probably taught him

some lessons of reserve, or at least he did not choose to expose

himself to public notice as the publisher of a work which was likely

to create much political interest, at least while the novelty of the

thing lasted. Though this gentleman declined to become the purchaser

of Mrs. Clarke's MS., he promised to recommend her to a publisher, who

would treat her justly and liberally. At the same time, Sir Richard

told Mrs. Clarke he conceived if she could obtain the arrears of her

annuity from the Duke, and a legal settlement for the payment of it

in future, together with the payment of all debts contracted during

her late connection with His Royal Highness, it would better answer

her purpose to suppress the publication altogether. To this reasonable

proposition Mrs. Clarke consented; negotiations were opened with the

Commander-in-Chief's advisers, and a projected plan of accommodation

made known. This was followed by a string of propositions on the other

side, which were drawn up, and assented to by Mrs. Clarke, and the

famous threatened _Memoirs_ of this lady, 'written by herself,' were

consigned to the flames on the premises of Mr. Gillet, the printer, of

Salisbury Square.

Eighteen thousand copies, with the perusal of which the country was to

have been indulged, were actually destroyed, and the entire publication

was effectually suppressed. Besides destroying the _Memoirs_ Mrs.

Clarke gave up ninety private letters, containing, it is said,

anecdotes of illustrious and noble personages, of the most curious

description.

_April 29._--'Mrs. Clarke's _Memoirs_ are said to have been suppressed,

in consequence of her receiving 7,000_l._ down, and an annuity of

400_l._ for her own life, and an annuity of 200_l._ each for her

respective daughters, with a promise that her son shall be provided

for. The printer of the work has also received 500_l._ of the

indemnification money.'[15]

It is difficult to discriminate between the alleged motives of Colonel

Wardle's action and his real object; public spirit was the mainspring

which directed the mover of the investigation, if we may trust his own

account, and for awhile the populace seems to have been of the same

opinion, as addresses of thanks from various corporations acknowledged

his patriotism. Somewhat later his disinterestedness began to be

questioned; then the ugly evidence of the house at Westbourne Place

was found difficult to argue away.[16] The absence of Major Dodd and

Mr. Glennie at the action--where their presence was of the utmost

importance--brought against the Colonel by one Wright, an upholsterer,

to recover the expenses of furnishing this house, looked suspicious;

the evidence was against the plaintiff, and Wardle was cast in the

suit, and had to pay 2,000_l._ and costs.

In the course of the trial it began to be hinted that the chief

instigator of these proceedings was no less than a royal Duke, the

brother of the Commander-in-Chief.

It seems tolerably clear, on sifting the motives of the several actors

and puppets in this matter, who had personally nothing to gain by the

Duke's dismissal, and who were obviously, with one or two exceptions,

corrupt agents in the first instance by their own confessions, and

therefore likely to be actuated by no higher principles in the

proceedings at issue, that they were (involuntarily in some cases)

exposing their own misdeeds to forward the purpose of a greater

personage, who did not appear, but to whose influence and purse they

looked for their reward.

Mrs. Clarke was, as everyone recognised, acting from the common

impulse of personal aggrandisement, and she frankly acknowledged her

principles. The year following the investigation, and the destruction

of her _Memoirs_, she thought proper to revenge the want of faith

which, according to her account, had characterised the proceedings of

the 'conspirators' in her own case, by exposing the true intentions

of the Duke's assailants; her motives, as she admitted, were in this

second exposure prompted by the same interested spirit which had

actuated the previous prosecution of her late friend and protector.

According to her account Colonel Wardle was simply a tool in the hands

of the Duke of Kent; his allies were Major Dodd and Mr. Glennie, the

former being the Duke of Kent's secretary--who engaged himself without

scruple to forward the projects of his employer. According to all

accounts Colonel Wardle had bribed the assistance of an ambitious

woman who fancied herself aggrieved, and who was, above all, amenable

to sordid incentives: the Duke had left her in debt, had broken his

word in more than one instance, and had used threats of the pillory

and the Bastille in reply to her applications; she was tired of living

in obscure retirement, and was irritated by the menaces of creditors,

whose demands she had no means of satisfying. The chief temptation held

out to her was, however, a promise that she should once more enjoy

that command of ease, and power of shining in the world of fashion,

which had been Mrs. Clarke's weakness through life. The arrears she

claimed were to be made up, her debts were to be paid, the allowance

she sought from the Duke of York (400_l_. per annum), was to be

doubled by his brother; she was to have a carriage and four, with a

residence and state in proportion; and she was to exercise her own

taste in furnishing a house with the elegance and splendour which had

marked her late establishment at Gloucester Place. To do the lady

justice, she hesitated before inflicting the grave injuries which

must attend the public exposure of her whilom benefactor, although

she was by no means habitually given to sentimentality. She wrote to

the Commander-in-Chief, asked for the allowance which, as she avowed,

she had done nothing to forfeit, and at the same time mentioned the

overtures which two factions were making her: one party for political

purposes--the Radical Reformers to wit, headed by Sir Francis Burdett

(who she declared had proposed to treat for the papers and letters in

her possession, some sixty of which, as she informed the Duke, were

in his own handwriting); the other influence brought to bear on her

was of a more subtle and covert description, and she went so far as to

indicate the disastrous consequences to himself which would inevitably

follow if she lent herself to the schemes of his personal antagonists.

The Duke of York remained obdurate, and thus played into the hands

of his personal and political enemies. Colonel Wardle seized the

opportunity. He gave Mrs. Clarke 100_l_. for present necessities, to

induce reliance in those liberal promises which were later repudiated.

The lady's natural sagacity, and her experience of life, furnished

her with strategic abilities almost equal to the combined talents of

the respective factions between which she found herself; and on the

strength of the assistance which she finally consented to afford to

Colonel Wardle and his supporters through Major Dodd--who, though

less seen, was the more active agent in organising the attack on the

Commander-in-Chief--she secured the house in Westbourne Place as an

earnest of the benefits she was to receive hereafter, and succeeded

in making Colonel Wardle become security for the furniture. In her

disappointment it must have proved at least somewhat of a consolation

to have out-manoeuvred the Colonel; who, for his reward, reaped in

the end the obloquy attending exposure and ridicule instead of the

glorification which at first appeared likely to crown his exertions.

Thus the combination was successfully set in motion, and, in spite of

all its discordant elements, compelled to work with something like

consistent unison, or its individual members were left to take the

consequences of any attempted retrogression, as in the instances of

Captain Sandon (Mrs. Clarke's ally), on the one hand, and General

Clavering,[17] whose sympathies were with his chief, on the other. The

opponents of the Duke of York were thus prepared to open the campaign

in the manner we have seen.

In 1810 Mrs. Clarke took up her pen to endeavour to prove that the Duke

of York's fall was actually brought about by the successful ingenuity

and masterly tactics of his brother the Duke of Kent. In a pamphlet

entitled _The Rival Princes_ she argued there was feud between the two

Dukes, a fact which was sufficiently accepted out of doors, before

the appearance of her publication, and that of the refutation which

followed it under the title of _The Rival Dukes_. It will be remembered

that early in 1802 the Duke of Kent obtained the governorship of

Gibraltar, and that when possessed of the supreme command he determined

to introduce all the rigour of German discipline, in accordance with

the school in which he had received his military education. His efforts

to remodel the existing regulations, and to substitute a system of

severer subordination and rigid restraint, were not attended with

auspicious results; on the contrary, a mutiny took place, December 24,

1803, in which, it is said, the Governor's life was actually aimed

at. On this occasion several officers distinguished themselves by

their zeal and activity; while the timely arrival of a detachment of

artillery under Captain Dodd, not only endeared that officer to his

royal highness through the remainder of his life, but contributed not

a little to restore order in the garrison. The Duke of Kent was soon

after recalled, and although he requested that the Commander-in-Chief

should hold a court-martial on his conduct, the Duke of York declined

to sanction the proceedings--Mrs. Clarke alleged out of fraternal

kindness, as he declared to her, that if he had acceded to his

brother's wishes, the Duke of Kent would certainly have been dismissed,

which would have resulted in the loss of his emoluments, and this would

have occasioned a reduction of some 2,000_l._ per annum in his income,

at a time too when he was in sufficiently straitened circumstances.

From the date of his return his royal highness remained unemployed, and

all efforts to obtain a restoration to his governorship, or attain any

command in the army, proved unavailing, although he had received the

baton of a field-marshal in 1805.

Rowlandson the Caricaturist; a Selection from His Works. Vol. 2 · 第 12 / 42 段