Newspapers for 1866 tell us that General Milroy, who had been spending

much time in Smith County, Tennessee, attending to some mining business,

discovered near Watertown in that county some remarkable graves, which

were disclosed by the washing of a small creek in its passage through a

low bottom. The graves were from eighteen inches to two feet in length,

most of them being of the smaller size, and were formed by an excavation

of about fifteen inches below the surface, in which were placed four

undressed slabs of rock--one in the bottom of the pit, one on each side,

and one on the top. Human skeletons, some with nearly an entire skull,

and many with well-defined bones, were found in them. The teeth were

very diminutive, but evidently those of adults. Earthen crocks were also

found with the skeletons. General Milroy could not gain any satisfactory

information respecting these pigmy graves. The oldest inhabitants of the

vicinity knew nothing of their origin or history, except that there was

a large number of similar graves near Statesville in the same county,

and also a little burial-ground at the mouth of Stone River, near the

city of Nashville. General Milroy deposited the bones found by him in

the State Library at Nashville.”

That a race of dwarfs live in Central Africa, is now well known. Ronzo

de Leo, who travelled in Africa, for many years with Dr. Livingstone, at

one time almost stood alone in his assertion of this fact. But he was

supported in his statement by G. Eugene Wolff, who had been in Central

Africa with Stanley, and he maintained that, on the southern branches of

the Congo, he had seen whole villages of Lilliputians, of whom the men

were not over four and a half feet high, whilst the women were a great

deal smaller. He described them as being both brave and cunning, expert

with bow and arrow, with which they readily bring down the African

bison, antelope, and even elephants. As trappers of small animals they

are unsurpassed. In a close pinch they use the lance with astonishing

dexterity, and an ordinary sling, in their hands, is wielded with

wonderful skill.

These dwarfs collect the sap of the palm, with which they make soap. The

men are smooth-faced, and of a rich mahogany colour, while the hair is

short, and as black as night. Tens of thousands of them live on the

south branch of the Congo.

Mr. Stanley in his expedition for the relief of Emin Pacha,[21]

encountered some tribes of these pigmies, but he does not agree with the

account which Mr. Wolff gives of them, who describes them as an affable,

kind-hearted people, of simple ways, and devoid of vicious tendencies to

a greater degree than most semi-barbaric races. The women are

industrious and amiable.

Stanley, on the contrary, found them very annoying, and had a lively

recollection of their poisoned arrows--but, at the present writing, he

not having returned, and we, having no record but his letters, had

better suspend our judgment as to the habits and tempers of these small

people.

Wolff says they stand in awe of their bigger neighbours, but are so

brave and cunning that, with all the odds of physique against them, the

pigmies are masters of the situation.

GIANTS.

This last sentence seems almost a compendium of _The History of Tom

Thumb_, for his wit enabled him to overcome the lubber-headed giants, in

every conflict he was engaged in with them--they were no match for him.

Take the Romances of Chivalry. Pacolet, and all the dwarfs, were endowed

with acute wits, and there was very little they could not compass--but

the giants! their ultimate fate was always to be slain by some knight,

and their imprisoned knights and damsels set free. A dwarf was a cleanly

liver, but a giant was turbulent, quarrelsome, lustful, and occasionally

cannibal. Fe Fi Fo Fum was the type of colossal man, and, as it is quite

a pleasure to whitewash their characters in these respects, I hasten to

do so before further discoursing on the subject of these great men.

It is Olaus Magnus who thus tells us

“Of the sobriety of Giants and Champions.”

[Illustration]

“That most famous Writer of the _Danish_ affairs, _Saxo_, alleged

before, and who shall be often alleged hereafter, saith, that amongst

other mighty strong men in the _North_, who were as great as Giants,

there was one _Starchaterus Thavestus_, whose admirable and heroick

Vertues are so worthily extolled by him, that there were scarce any

like him in those dayes in all _Europe_, or in the whole World, or

hardly are now, or ever shall be. And amongst other Vertues he ascribes

to that high-spirited man, he mentions his sobriety, which is

principally necessary for valiant men: and I thought fit to annex that

peculiarly to this relation, that we may, as in a glass, see more

cleerly the luxury of this lustful age. For, as the same _Saxo_

testifies, that valiant _Starchaterus_ loved frugality, and loved not

immoderate dainties. Alwayes neglecting pleasure, he respected Vertue,

imitating the antient manner of Continency, and he desired a homely

provision of his Diet; he hated costly suppers; wherefore hating

profusion in Diet, and feeding on smoaked and rank meat, he drove away

Hunger, with the greater appetite, as his meat was but of one kind, lest

he should remit and abate the force of his true Vertue, by the contagion

of outward Delights, as by some adulterate sweetness, or should abrogate

the Rule of antient Frugality, by unusual Superstitions for Gluttony.

Moreover, he could not endure to spend rost and boyled meat all at one

Meal; holding that to be a monstrous Food, that Cookery had tampered

with divers things together: Wherefore, that he might turn away the

Luxury of the _Danes_, that they borrowed from the _Germans_, that made

them so effeminate, amongst the rest he made Verses in his Country

Language.” Omitting many of them, he sang thus:

“_Starchaterus_ his Verses on _Frugality_.

“Strong men do love raw meat; nor do they need,

Or love, on dainty Cates and Feasts to feed,

War is the thing they most delight to breed,

You may sooner bite off their beards that are

Full hard, and stiff with bristled, rugged, hair,

Than their wide mouths leave Milk their daily fare:

We fly from dainty Kitchins, and do fill

Our Bellies with rank Meats, and Countray swill,

Of old, men fed on boyl’d Meats, ’gainst their will.

A dish of Grass, that had no smack, did hold

Hog’s and sheep’s flesh together, hot or cold,

Nor to pollute their meats with mingling were they bold;

He that eats Cream we bid him for to be

Strong, and to have a mind that’s bold and free.

* * * * *

Eleven Lords of elder time we were,

That waited on King Hachon, and at fare

_Helgo Begachus_ sat first in order there.

First dish he eat was a dry’d Gammon, and

A Crust as hard as Flint he took in hand,

This made his hungry, yawning stomach stand:

No man at Table fed on stinking meat,

But what was good and common, each man eat,

Content with simple fare, though nere so great;

The greatest were not Gluttons, nor yet fine,

The King himself full sparingly would dine.

No Drinks were used that did of Honey bost,

Beer was their common Liquor, _Ceres_ owest,

They fed on Meats were little boyl’d, no rost.

Each Table was with Meats but meanly drest,

Few Dishes on’t, Antiquity thought best;

And in plain Fare each held himself most blest.

There were no Flagons, nor broad Bowls in use,

Nor painted Dishes grown to great abuse,

Each, at the Tap, did fill his wooden cruze.

No man, admirer of the former days,

Did use Tankards or Oxeys;[22] for their ways

Were sparing, almost empty Dishes this bewrays.

No Silver Basons, or guilt Cups were thought

Fit by the Host, and to the table brought,

To garnish, or by Ghests were vainly sought.”

By precept, and example, he induced many to Temperance and

Sobriety--but, in spite of his moderation in food and drink, he was a

most outrageous pirate, and Berserker.

At last, however, old, and weary of life, he sought death, and meeting

Hatherus, son of a noble whom he had killed, begged him as a favour to

cut his head off--and the young man, obligingly consenting, his head was

severed from his body, and literally bit the ground. There are records

of many more Northern giants, but none of so edifying a life as

Starchaterus.

Giants are plentiful in the Bible, the Emins, Anakims, and the

Zamzummims: there was Og, King of Bashan, whose iron bedstead was 9

cubits long by 4 broad--_i.e._, 13 ft. 6 in. by 6 ft. That redoubtable

champion of the Philistines, Goliath of Gath, was six cubits and a span

high--_i.e._, 9 ft. 9 in. In 2 Samuel xxi. 15-22, we find mention made

of many giants.

“15 Moreover the Philistines had yet war again with Israel; and David

went down, and his servants with him, and fought against the

Philistines; and David waxed faint.

“16 And Ishbi-benob, which was of the sons of the giants, the weight of

whose spear weighed three hundred shekels of brass in weight, he being

girded with a new sword, thought to have slain David.

“17 But Abishai the son of Zeruiah succoured him, and smote the

Philistine, and killed him....

“18 And it came to pass after this, that there was again a battle with

the Philistines at Gob: then Sibbechai the Hushathite slew Saph, which

was of the sons of the giant.

“19 And there was again a battle in Gob with the Philistines, where

Elhanan the son of Jaare-oregim, a Bethlehemite, slew the brother of

Goliath the Gittite, the staff of whose spear was like a weaver’s beam.

“20 And there was yet a battle in Gath, where was a man of great

stature, and on every foot six toes, four and twenty in number; and he

also was born to the giant.

“21 And when he defied Israel, Jonathan the son of Shimeah, the brother

of David, slew him.

“22 These four were born to the giant in Gath, and fell by the hand of

David, and by the hand of his servants.”

But these were mere pigmies if we can believe M. Henrion, who in 1718

calculated out the heights of divers notable persons--thus he found Adam

was 121 ft. 9 in. high, Eve 118 ft. 9 in., Noah 27 ft., Abraham 20 ft.,

and Moses 13 ft.

Putting aside the mythical classical giants, Pliny says: “The tallest

man that has been seen in our times, was one Gabbaras by name, who was

brought from Arabia by the Emperor Claudius; his height was nine feet

and as many inches. In the reign of Augustus, there were two persons,

Posio and Secundilla, by name, who were half a foot taller than him;

their bodies have been preserved as objects of curiosity in the Museum

of the Sallustian family.”

But it is reserved to Sir John Mandeville to have found the tallest

giants of, comparatively speaking, modern times. “And beyond that valey

is a great yle, where people as great as giaunts of xxviii fote long,

and they have no clothinge but beasts skyns that hang on them, and they

eate no bread, but flesh raw, and drink milke, and they have no houses,

& they ate gladlyer fleshe of men, than other, & men saye to us that

beyonde that yle is an yle where are greater giaunts as xlv or l fote

long, & some said l cubits long (_75 feet_) but I saw them not, and

among those giaunts are great shepe, and they beare great wolle, these

shepe have I sene many times.”

EARLY MEN.

On the antiquity of man it is impossible to speculate, because we have

no data to go upon. We know that his earliest existence, of which we

have any cognisance, must have been at a period when the climate and

fauna of the Western continent was totally different to their present

state. Then roamed over the land, the elephant, rhinoceros,

hippopotamus, the Bos-primigenius, the reindeer, the cave bear, the

brown and the Arctic bears, the cave hyæna, and many other animals now

quite extinct. We know that man then existed, because we find his

handiwork in the shape of manufactured flint implements, mixed with the

bones of these animals--and, occasionally, with them human remains have

been found, but, as yet, no perfect skull has been found. There were two

types of man, the Dolicho Cephalous, or long-headed, and the Brachy

Cephalous, or round-headed--and, of these, the long-headed were of far

greater antiquity.

All we can do is to classify man’s habitation of this earth, as well as

we can, under certain well-defined, and known conditions. Thus, that

called the Stone Age, must be divided into two parts, that of the

roughly chipped flint implements--which is designated the _Palæolithic_

period--and that of the polished and carefully finished stone arms and

implements, which necessarily show a later time, and a higher state of

civilisation--which is called the _Neolithic_ period. The next age is

that of bronze, when man had learned to smelt metals, and make moulds,

showing a great advance--and, finally, the Iron Age, in which man had

subdued the sterner metal to his will--and this age immediately precedes

History.

The cave men were of undoubted antiquity--and were hunters of the wild

beasts that then overran Western Europe, and who split the bones of

those animals which they slew in order to obtain the marrow. Although

strictly belonging to the Palæolithic period, they manufactured out of

that stubborn material, flint, spear-heads, knives, scrapers--and, when

the bow had been invented, arrow-heads. Nor were they deficient in the

rudiments of art, as some tracings and carvings on pieces of the horns

of slaughtered animals, clearly show. Mr. Christie in digging in the

Dordogne caves found, at La Madelaine, engraved and carved pictures of

reindeer, an ibex, a mammoth, &c., all of them recognisable, and the

mammoth, a very good likeness. This was incised on a piece of mammoth

tusk.

The lake men, judging by the remains found near their dwellings,

occupied their houses during the Stone and Bronze periods. Herodotus

mentions these curious dwellings. “But those around Mount Pangæus and

near the Doberes, the Agrianæ, Odomanti, and those who inhabit Lake

Prasias[23] itself, were not at all subdued by Megabazus. Yet he

attempted to conquer those who live upon the lake, in dwellings

contrived after this manner: planks, fitted on lofty piles, are placed

in the middle of the lake, with a narrow entrance from the mainland by

a single bridge. These piles that support the planks, all the citizens

anciently placed there at the common charge; but, afterwards, they

established a law to the following effect; whenever a man marries, for

each wife he sinks three piles, bringing wood from a mountain called

Orbelus; but every man has several wives. They live in the following

manner; every man has a hut on the planks, in which he dwells, with a

trap door closely fitted in the planks, and leading down to the lake.

They tie the young children with a cord round the foot, fearing lest

they should fall into the lake beneath. To their horses and beasts of

burden they give fish for fodder; of which there is such an abundance,

that, when a man has opened his trap-door, he lets down an empty basket

by a cord into the lake, and, after waiting a short time, draws it up

full of fish.”[24]

Here, then, we have a valuable record of the lake dwellings, and similar

ones have been found in the lake of Zurich. In 1854, owing to the

dryness and cold of the preceding winter, the water fell a foot below

any previous record: and, in a small bay between Ober Meilen and

Dollikon, the inhabitants took advantage to reclaim the soil thus left,

and add it to their gardens, by building a wall as far out as they

could--and they raised the level of the land thus gained, by dredging

the mud out of the lake. In the course of dredging they found deer

horns, tiles and various implements, and, the attention of an antiquary

having been directed to this find, he concluded that it was the site of

an ancient lake village. The lakes of Geneva, Constance, and

Neufchatel, have also yielded much that throws light on the habits and

intelligence of these lake men. They wove, they made pottery, they grew

and parched corn--nay they ground it, and made biscuits, they ate

apples, raspberries, blackberries, strawberries, hazel and beech nuts,

and peas. They evidently fed on cereals, fruit, fish, and the flesh of

wild animals, for bones of the following animals have been found. Brown

bear, badger, marten, pine marten, polecat, wolf, fox, wild cat, beaver,

elk, urus, bison, stag, roe-deer, wild boar, marsh boar--whilst their

domestic animals were the boar, horse, ox, goat, sheep, and dog. These,

it must be remembered, range over a wide period, including the stone and

bronze ages. They wore ornaments, too, for pins, and bracelets have been

found. Lake dwellings have been found in Scotland, England, Italy,

Germany and France--so that this practice seems to have obtained very

widely. In Ireland they made artificial islands in the lakes, called

Crannoges, on which they erected their dwellings. Pile dwellings now

exist, and are inhabited in many parts of the world.

We have other traces of prehistoric man in the shell mounds,

kjökkenmöddings, or kitchen middens, which still exist in Denmark, and

have been found in Scotland on the shores of the Moray Firth and Loch

Spynie; in Cornwall, and Devon, at St. Valéry at the mouth of the Somme,

in Australia, Tierra del Fuego, the Malay Peninsula, the Andaman

Islands, and North and South America, showing a very wide range. The

Danish kjökkenmöddings, when first thoroughly noticed, (of course, in

this century), were taken to be raised beaches--but when they were

examined, it was found that the shells were of four species of molluscs

or shell-fish,[25] that did not live together, and that they were

either full-grown, or nearly so. A stricter examination was made, and

the result was the finding of some flint implements, and bones marked by

knives, conclusively showing that man had had a hand in this collection

of shells--and the conclusion was come to that these were the sites of

villages of a prehistoric man, a hypothesis which was fully borne out by

the discovery, in some of them, of hearths bearing traces of having

borne fire. Thus, then, these refuse heaps were clearly the work of a

very ancient race, so poor, and backward, as to be obliged to live on

shell-fish--and these mounds were made by the shells which they threw

away.

We can find a very great analogy between them and the Tierra del

Fuegans, when Darwin visited them, while with the surveying ships

_Adventure_ and _Beagle_, a voyage which took from 1832 to 1836; and,

when we read the following extracts from Darwin’s account of the

expedition, we can fancy we have before us a vivid picture of the makers

of the kitchen middens. “The inhabitants, living chiefly upon

shell-fish, are obliged constantly to change their place of residence;

but they return at intervals to the same spots, as is evident from the

pile of old shells, which must often amount to some tons in weight.

These heaps can be distinguished at a long distance by the bright green

colour of certain plants which invariably grow on them.... The Fuegian

wigwam resembles, in size and dimensions, a haycock. It merely consists

of a few broken branches stuck in the ground, and very imperfectly

thatched on one side, with a few tufts of grass and rushes. The whole

cannot be so much as the work of an hour, and it is only used for a few

days.... At a subsequent period, the _Beagle_ anchored for a couple of

days under Wollaston Island, which is a short way to the northward.

While going on shore, we pulled alongside a canoe with six Fuegians.

These were the most abject and miserable creatures I anywhere beheld. On

the east coast, the natives, as we have seen, have guanaco cloaks, and,

on the west, they possess sealskins. Amongst the central tribes the men

generally possess an otter skin, or some small scrap about as large as a

pocket handkerchief, which is barely sufficient to cover their backs as

low down as their loins. It is laced across the breast by strings, and,

according as the wind blows, it is shifted from side to side. But these

Fuegians in the canoe were quite naked, and even one full-grown woman

was absolutely so. It was raining heavily, and the fresh water, together

with the spray, trickled down her body.... These poor wretches were

stunted in their growth, their hideous faces bedaubed with white paint,

their skins filthy and greasy, their hair entangled, their voices

discordant, their gestures violent and without dignity. Viewing such

men, one can hardly make oneself believe they are fellow-creatures and

inhabitants of the same world.... At night, five or six human beings,

naked, and scarcely protected from the wind and rain of this tempestuous

climate, sleep on the wet ground, coiled up like animals. Whenever it is

low water, they must rise to pick shell-fish from the rocks; and the

women, winter and summer, either dive and collect sea eggs, or sit

patiently in their canoes, and, with a baited hair line, jerk out small

fish. If a seal is killed, or the floating carcase of a putrid whale

discovered, it is a feast: such miserable food is assisted by a few

tasteless berries, and fungi. Nor are they exempt from famine, and, as a

consequence, cannibalism accompanied by parricide.”

This I believe to be as faithful a picture as can be drawn of the makers

of the shell mounds.

But in Denmark, although shells formed by far the major part of these

middens, yet they ate other fish, the herring, dorse, dab, and eel.

Birds also were not despised by them, bones of swallows, the sparrow,

stork, capercailzie, ducks, geese, wild swans, and even of the great auk

(now extinct) have been found. Then of beasts they ate the stag,

roe-deer, wild boar, urus, dog, fox, wolf, marten, otter, lynx, wild

cat, hedgehog, bear, and mouse; beside which they lived on the seal,

porpoise, and water rat.

Owing to the almost total absence of polished implements--and yet the

fact being that portions of one or two have been found--the makers of

these kjökkenmöddings, are classed as belonging to the later Palæolithic

period.

Of the Bronze and Iron Ages there is no necessity to write, men were

emerging from their primæval barbarity--and all the gentle arts, though

undeveloped, were nascent. Men who could smelt metals, and mould, and

forge them, cannot be considered as utter barbarians, such as were the

long-headed men, with their chipped flint implements and weapons.

WILD MEN.

Sometimes a specimen of humanity has got astray in infancy, and has been

dragged up somehow in the woods, like Caspar Hauser, and Peter the Wild

Boy, and fiction supplies other instances, such as Romulus and Remus,

Orson, &c. Some of them were credited with being hairy as are the

accompanying wild man and woman, as they are portrayed in John Sluper’s

book, where they are thus described:--

[Illustration]

“L’HOMME SAUVAGE.

“Combien que Dieu le createur seul sage,

A fait user les hommes de raison:

Icy voyez un vray homme sauvage,

Son corps vela est en toute saison.”

[Illustration]

“LA FEMME SAUVAGE.

“Femme sauvage a l’œil humain, non sainte,

Ainsi qu’elle est sur le naturel lieu,

Au naturel vous est icy depeinte,

Comme voyez qu’il appert a votre vue.”

When Cæsar came to Britain for the second time, he found the Britons,

although to a great extent civilised, having cavalry and charioteers (so

many of the latter, that Cassivelaunus left about 4000 to watch the

Romans), and knowing the art of fortification, yet in themselves, only

just emerging from utter barbarism--the colouring and shaving of

themselves showed that they had vanity, and were making, after their

fashion, the most of their personal charms. Cæsar (Book v. 14) writes:

“Of all these _tribes_, by far the most civilised are those who inhabit

Kent, which district is altogether maritime; nor do they differ much

from the Gallic customs. Most of those in the interior do not sow corn,

but live on flesh and milk, and are clad in skins. All the Britons, in

truth, dye themselves with woad, which produces a bluish colour, and on

this account they are of a more frightful aspect in battle. They have

flowing hair, and every part of the body shaved, except the head and the

upper lip. Ten, and _even_ twelve of them have wives in common between

them, and chiefly brothers with brothers, and fathers with sons; but, if

there is any offspring, they are considered to be the children of those

by whom each virgin was first espoused.”

HAIRY MEN.

If, as we may conjecture from the above, the ancient Briton was “a

rugged man, o’ergrown with hair,” his full-dress toilette must have

occupied some time. But extreme hairiness in human beings is by no means

singular, and very many cases are recorded in medical books. Many of us

may remember the Spanish dancer, Julia Pastrana, whose whole body was

hairy, and who had a fine beard. She had a child on whom the hair began

to grow, like its mother; and, but a few years back, there was a hairy

family exhibited in London--their faces being covered with hair, as is

the case of the _Puella pilosa_, or Hairy Girl--given by Aldrovandus in

his _Monstrorum Historia_.

[Illustration]

Curious Creatures in Zoology · 第 2 / 20 段