Note.--By good I here mean every kind of pleasure, and all

that conduces thereto, especially that which satisfies our

longings, whatsoever they may be. By evil, I mean every kind of

pain, especially that which frustrates our longings. For I have

shown (III. ix. note) that we in no case desire a thing because

we deem it good, but, contrariwise, we deem a thing good because

we desire it: consequently we deem evil that which we shrink

from; everyone, therefore, according to his particular emotions,

judges or estimates what is good, what is bad, what is better,

what is worse, lastly, what is best, and what is worst. Thus a

miser thinks that abundance of money is the best, and want of

money the worst; an ambitious man desires nothing so much as

glory, and fears nothing so much as shame. To an envious man

nothing is more delightful than another's misfortune, and nothing

more painful than another's success. So every man, according to

his emotions, judges a thing to be good or bad, useful or

useless. The emotion, which induces a man to turn from that

which he wishes, or to wish for that which he turns from, is

called timidity, which may accordingly be defined as the fear

whereby a man is induced to avoid an evil which he regards as

future by encountering a lesser evil (III. xxviii.). But if the

evil which he fears be shame, timidity becomes bashfulness.

Lastly, if the desire to avoid a future evil be checked by the

fear of another evil, so that the man knows not which to choose,

fear becomes consternation, especially if both the evils feared

be very great.

PROP. XL. He, who conceives himself to be hated by another, and

believes that he has given him no cause for hatred, will hate

that other in return.

Proof.--He who conceives another as affected with hatred, will

thereupon be affected himself with hatred (III. xxvii.), that is,

with pain, accompanied by the idea of an external cause. But, by

the hypothesis, he conceives no cause for this pain except him

who is his enemy; therefore, from conceiving that he is hated by

some one, he will be affected with pain, accompanied by the idea

of his enemy; in other words, he will hate his enemy in return.

Q.E.D.

Note.--He who thinks that he has given just cause for hatred

will (III. xxx. and note) be affected with shame; but this case

(III. xxv.) rarely happens. This reciprocation of hatred may

also arise from the hatred, which follows an endeavour to injure

the object of our hate (III. xxxix.). He therefore who conceives

that he is hated by another will conceive his enemy as the cause

of some evil or pain; thus he will be affected with pain or

fear, accompanied by the idea of his enemy as cause; in other

words, he will be affected with hatred towards his enemy, as I

said above.

Corollary I.--He who conceives, that one whom he loves hates

him, will be a prey to conflicting hatred and love. For, in so

far as he conceives that he is an object of hatred, he is

determined to hate his enemy in return. But, by the hypothesis,

he nevertheless loves him: wherefore he will be a prey to

conflicting hatred and love.

Corollary II.--If a man conceives that one, whom he has

hitherto regarded without emotion, has done him any injury from

motives of hatred, he will forthwith seek to repay the injury in

kind.

Proof.--He who conceives, that another hates him, will (by the

last proposition) hate his enemy in return, and (III. xxvi.) will

endeavour to recall everything which can affect him painfully;

he will moreover endeavour to do him an injury (III. xxxix.).

Now the first thing of this sort which he conceives is the injury

done to himself; he will, therefore, forthwith endeavour to

repay it in kind. Q.E.D.

Note.--The endeavour to injure one whom we hate is called

Anger; the endeavour to repay in kind injury done to ourselves

is called Revenge.

PROP. XLI. If anyone conceives that he is loved by another, and

believes that he has given no cause for such love, he will love

that other in return. (Cf. III. xv. Coroll., and III. xvi.)

Proof.--This proposition is proved in the same way as the

preceding one. See also the note appended thereto.

Note.--If he believes that he has given just cause for the

love, he will take pride therein (III. xxx. and note); this is

what most often happens (III. xxv.), and we said that its

contrary took place whenever a man conceives himself to be hated

by another. (See note to preceding proposition.) This

reciprocal love, and consequently the desire of benefiting him

who loves us (III. xxxix.), and who endeavours to benefit us, is

called gratitude or thankfulness. It thus appears that men are

much more prone to take vengeance than to return benefits.

Corollary.--He who imagines that he is loved by one whom he

hates, will be a prey to conflicting hatred and love. This is

proved in the same way as the first corollary of the preceding

proposition.

Note.--If hatred be the prevailing emotion, he will endeavour

to injure him who loves him; this emotion is called cruelty,

especially if the victim be believed to have given no ordinary

cause for hatred.

PROP. XLII. He who has conferred a benefit on anyone from

motives of love or honour will feel pain, if he sees that the

benefit is received without gratitude.

Proof.--When a man loves something similar to himself, he

endeavours, as far as he can, to bring it about that he should be

loved thereby in return (III. xxxiii.). Therefore he who has

conferred a benefit confers it in obedience to the desire, which

he feels of being loved in return; that is (III. xxxiv.) from

the hope of honour or (III. xxx. note) pleasure; hence he will

endeavour, as far as he can, to conceive this cause of honour, or

to regard it as actually existing. But, by the hypothesis, he

conceives something else, which excludes the existence of the

said cause of honour: wherefore he will thereat feel pain (III.

xix.). Q.E.D.

PROP. XLIII. Hatred is increased by being reciprocated, and can

on the other hand be destroyed by love.

Proof.--He who conceives, that an object of his hatred hates

him in return, will thereupon feel a new hatred, while the former

hatred (by hypothesis) still remains (III. xl.). But if, on the

other hand, he conceives that the object of hate loves him, he

will to this extent (III. xxxviii.) regard himself with pleasure,

and (III. xxix.) will endeavour to please the cause of his

emotion. In other words, he will endeavour not to hate him (III.

xli.), and not to affect him painfully; this endeavour (III.

xxxvii.) will be greater or less in proportion to the emotion

from which it arises. Therefore, if it be greater than that

which arises from hatred, and through which the man endeavours to

affect painfully the thing which he hates, it will get the better

of it and banish the hatred from his mind. Q.E.D.

PROP. XLIV. Hatred which is completely vanquished by love passes

into love: and love is thereupon greater than if hatred had not

preceded it.

Proof.--The proof proceeds in the same way as Prop. xxxviii.

of this Part: for he who begins to love a thing, which he was

wont to hate or regard with pain, from the very fact of loving

feels pleasure. To this pleasure involved in love is added the

pleasure arising from aid given to the endeavour to remove the

pain involved in hatred (III. xxxvii.), accompanied by the idea

of the former object of hatred as cause.

Note.--Though this be so, no one will endeavour to hate

anything, or to be affected with pain, for the sake of enjoying

this greater pleasure; that is, no one will desire that he

should be injured, in the hope of recovering from the injury, nor

long to be ill for the sake of getting well. For everyone will

always endeavour to persist in his being, and to ward off pain as

far as he can. If the contrary is conceivable, namely, that a

man should desire to hate someone, in order that he might love

him the more thereafter, he will always desire to hate him. For

the strength of love is in proportion to the strength of the

hatred, wherefore the man would desire, that the hatred be

continually increased more and more, and, for a similar reason,

he would desire to become more and more ill, in order that he

might take a greater pleasure in being restored to health: in

such a case he would always endeavour to be ill, which (III. vi.)

is absurd.

PROP. XLV. If a man conceives, that anyone similar to himself

hates anything also similar to himself, which he loves, he will

hate that person.

Proof.--The beloved object feels reciprocal hatred towards him

who hates it (III. xl.); therefore the lover, in conceiving that

anyone hates the beloved object, conceives the beloved thing as

affected by hatred, in other words (III. xiii.), by pain;

consequently he is himself affected by pain accompanied by the

idea of the hater of the beloved thing as cause; that is, he

will hate him who hates anything which he himself loves (III.

xiii. note). Q.E.D.

PROP. XLVI. If a man has been affected pleasurably or painfully

by anyone, of a class or nation different from his own, and if

the pleasure or pain has been accompanied by the idea of the said

stranger as cause, under the general category of the class or

nation: the man will feel love or hatred, not only to the

individual stranger, but also to the whole class or nation

whereto he belongs.

Proof.--This is evident from III. xvi.

PROP. XLVII. Joy arising from the fact, that anything we hate is

destroyed, or suffers other injury, is never unaccompanied by a

certain pain in us.

Proof.--This is evident from III. xxvii. For in so far as we

conceive a thing similar to ourselves to be affected with pain,

we ourselves feel pain.

Note.--This proposition can also be proved from the Corollary

to II. xvii. Whenever we remember anything, even if it does not

actually exist, we regard it only as present, and the body is

affected in the same manner; wherefore, in so far as the

remembrance of the thing is strong, a man is determined to regard

it with pain; this determination, while the image of the thing

in question lasts, is indeed checked by the remembrance of other

things excluding the existence of the aforesaid thing, but is not

destroyed: hence, a man only feels pleasure in so far as the

said determination is checked: for this reason the joy arising

from the injury done to what we hate is repeated, every time we

remember that object of hatred. For, as we have said, when the

image of the thing in question, is aroused, inasmuch as it

involves the thing's existence, it determines the man to regard

the thing with the same pain as he was wont to do, when it

actually did exist. However, since he has joined to the image of

the thing other images, which exclude its existence, this

determination to pain is forthwith checked, and the man rejoices

afresh as often as the repetition takes place. This is the cause

of men's pleasure in recalling past evils, and delight in

narrating dangers from which they have escaped. For when men

conceive a danger, they conceive it as still future, and are

determined to fear it; this determination is checked afresh by

the idea of freedom, which became associated with the idea of the

danger when they escaped therefrom: this renders them secure

afresh: therefore they rejoice afresh.

PROP. XLVIII. Love or hatred towards, for instance, Peter is

destroyed, if the pleasure involved in the former, or the pain

involved in the latter emotion, be associated with the idea of

another cause: and will be diminished in proportion as we

conceive Peter not to have been the sole cause of either emotion.

Proof.--This Prop. is evident from the mere definition of love

and hatred (III. xiii. note). For pleasure is called love

towards Peter, and pain is called hatred towards Peter, simply in

so far as Peter is regarded as the cause of one emotion or the

other. When this condition of causality is either wholly or

partly removed, the emotion towards Peter also wholly or in part

vanishes. Q.E.D.

PROP. XLIX. Love or hatred towards a thing, which we conceive to

be free, must, other conditions being similar, be greater than if

it were felt towards a thing acting by necessity.

Proof.--A thing which we conceive as free must (I. Def. vii.)

be perceived through itself without anything else. If,

therefore, we conceive it as the cause of pleasure or pain, we

shall therefore (III. xiii. note) love it or hate it, and shall

do so with the utmost love or hatred that can arise from the

given emotion. But if the thing which causes the emotion be

conceived as acting by necessity, we shall then (by the same Def.

vii. Part I.) conceive it not as the sole cause, but as one of

the causes of the emotion, and therefore our love or hatred

towards it will be less. Q.E.D.

Note.--Hence it follows, that men, thinking themselves to be

free, feel more love or hatred towards one another than towards

anything else: to this consideration we must add the imitation

of emotions treated of in III. xxvii., xxxiv., xl. and xliii.

PROP. L. Anything whatever can be, accidentally, a cause of hope

or fear.

Proof.--This proposition is proved in the same way as III.

xv., which see, together with the note to III. xviii.

Note.--Things which are accidentally the causes of hope or

fear are called good or evil omens. Now, in so far as such omens

are the cause of hope or fear, they are (by the definitions of

hope and fear given in III. xviii. note) the causes also of

pleasure and pain; consequently we, to this extent, regard them

with love or hatred, and endeavour either to invoke them as means

towards that which we hope for, or to remove them as obstacles,

or causes of that which we fear. It follows, further, from III.

xxv., that we are naturally so constituted as to believe readily

in that which we hope for, and with difficulty in that which we

fear; moreover, we are apt to estimate such objects above or

below their true value. Hence there have arisen superstitions,

whereby men are everywhere assailed. However, I do not think it

worth while to point out here the vacillations springing from

hope and fear; it follows from the definition of these emotions,

that there can be no hope without fear, and no fear without hope,

as I will duly explain in the proper place. Further, in so far

as we hope for or fear anything, we regard it with love or hatred;

thus everyone can apply by himself to hope and fear what we

have said concerning love and hatred.

PROP. LI. Different men may be differently affected by the same

object, and the same man may be differently affected at different

times by the same object.

Proof.--The human body is affected by external bodies in a

variety of ways (II. Post. iii.). Two men may therefore be

differently affected at the same time, and therefore (by Ax. i.

after Lemma iii. after II. xiii.) may be differently affected by

one and the same object. Further (by the same Post.) the human

body can be affected sometimes in one way, sometimes in another;

consequently (by the same Axiom) it may be differently affected

at different times by one and the same object. Q.E.D.

Note.--We thus see that it is possible, that what one man

loves another may hate, and that what one man fears another may

not fear; or, again, that one and the same man may love what he

once hated, or may be bold where he once was timid, and so on.

Again, as everyone judges according to his emotions what is good,

what bad, what better, and what worse (III. xxxix. note), it

follows that men's judgments may vary no less than their

emotions[10], hence when we compare some with others, we

distinguish them solely by the diversity of their emotions, and

style some intrepid, others timid, others by some other epithet.

For instance, I shall call a man intrepid, if he despises an evil

which I am accustomed to fear; if I further take into

consideration, that, in his desire to injure his enemies and to

benefit those whom he loves, he is not restrained by the fear of

an evil which is sufficient to restrain me, I shall call him

daring. Again, a man will appear timid to me, if he fears an

evil which I am accustomed to despise; and if I further take

into consideration that his desire is restrained by the fear of

an evil, which is not sufficient to restrain me, I shall say that

he is cowardly; and in like manner will everyone pass judgment.

[10] This is possible, though the human mind is part of the divine

intellect, as I have shown in II. xiii. note.

Lastly, from this inconstancy in the nature of human

judgment, inasmuch as a man often judges things solely by his

emotions, and inasmuch as the things which he believes cause

pleasure or pain, and therefore endeavours to promote or prevent,

are often purely imaginary, not to speak of the uncertainty of

things alluded to in III. xxviii.; we may readily conceive that

a man may be at one time affected with pleasure, and at another

with pain, accompanied by the idea of himself as cause. Thus we

can easily understand what are Repentance and Self--complacency.

Repentance is pain, accompanied by the idea of one's self as

cause; Self--complacency is pleasure, accompanied by the idea of

one's self as cause, and these emotions are most intense because

men believe themselves to be free (III. xlix.).

PROP. LII. An object which we have formerly seen in conjunction

with others, and which we do not conceive to have any property

that is not common to many, will not be regarded by us for so

long, as an object which we conceive to have some property

peculiar to itself.

Proof.--As soon as we conceive an object which we have seen in

conjunction with others, we at once remember those others (II.

xviii. and note), and thus we pass forthwith from the

contemplation of one object to the contemplation of another

object. And this is the case with the object, which we conceive

to have no property that is not common to many. For we thereupon

assume that we are regarding therein nothing, which we have not

before seen in conjunction with other objects. But when we

suppose that we conceive an object something special, which we

have never seen before, we must needs say that the mind, while

regarding that object, has in itself nothing which it can fall to

regarding instead thereof; therefore it is determined to the

contemplation of that object only. Therefore an object, &c.

Q.E.D.

Note.--This mental modification, or imagination of a

particular thing, in so far as it is alone in the mind, is called

Wonder; but if it be excited by an object of fear, it is called

Consternation, because wonder at an evil keeps a man so engrossed

in the simple contemplation thereof, that he has no power to

think of anything else whereby he might avoid the evil. If,

however, the object of wonder be a man's prudence, industry, or

anything of that sort, inasmuch as the said man, is thereby

regarded as far surpassing ourselves, wonder is called Veneration;

otherwise, if a man's anger, envy, &c., be what we wonder at,

the emotion is called Horror. Again, if it be the prudence,

industry, or what not, of a man we love, that we wonder at, our

love will on this account be the greater (III. xii.), and when

joined to wonder or veneration is called Devotion. We may in

like manner conceive hatred, hope, confidence, and the other

emotions, as associated with wonder; and we should thus be able

to deduce more emotions than those which have obtained names in

ordinary speech. Whence it is evident, that the names of the

emotions have been applied in accordance rather with their

ordinary manifestations than with an accurate knowledge of their

nature.

To wonder is opposed Contempt, which generally arises from

the fact that, because we see someone wondering at, loving, or

fearing something, or because something, at first sight, appears

to be like things, which we ourselves wonder at, love, fear, &c.,

we are, in consequence (III. xv. Coroll. and III. xxvii.),

determined to wonder at, love, or fear that thing. But if from

the presence, or more accurate contemplation of the said thing,

we are compelled to deny concerning it all that can be the cause

of wonder, love, fear, &c., the mind then, by the presence of the

thing, remains determined to think rather of those qualities

which are not in it, than of those which are in it; whereas, on

the other hand, the presence of the object would cause it more

particularly to regard that which is therein. As devotion

springs from wonder at a thing which we love, so does Derision

spring from contempt of a thing which we hate or fear, and Scorn

from contempt of folly, as veneration from wonder at prudence.

Lastly, we can conceive the emotions of love, hope, honour, &c.,

in association with contempt, and can thence deduce other

emotions, which are not distinguished one from another by any

recognized name.

PROP. LIII. When the mind regards itself and its own power of

activity, it feels pleasure: and that pleasure is greater in

proportion to the distinctness wherewith it conceives itself and

its own power of activity.

Proof.--A man does not know himself except through the

modifications of his body, and the ideas thereof (II. xix. and

xxiii.). When, therefore, the mind is able to contemplate

itself, it is thereby assumed to pass to a greater perfection, or

(III. xi. note) to feel pleasure; and the pleasure will be

greater in proportion to the distinctness, wherewith it is able

to conceive itself and its own power of activity. Q.E.D.

Corollary.--This pleasure is fostered more and more, in

proportion as a man conceives himself to be praised by others.

For the more he conceives himself as praised by others, the more

he will imagine them to be affected with pleasure, accompanied by

the idea of himself (III. xxix. note); thus he is (III. xxvii.)

himself affected with greater pleasure, accompanied by the idea

of himself. Q.E.D.

PROP. LIV. The mind endeavours to conceive only such things as

assert its power of activity.

Proof.--The endeavour or power of the mind is the actual

essence thereof (III. vii.); but the essence of the mind

obviously only affirms that which the mind is and can do; not

that which it neither is nor can do; therefore the mind

endeavours to conceive only such things as assert or affirm its

power of activity. Q.E.D.

PROP. LV. When the mind contemplates its own weakness, it feels

pain thereat.

Proof.--The essence of the mind only affirms that which the

mind is, or can do; in other words, it is the mind's nature to

conceive only such things as assert its power of activity (last

Prop.). Thus, when we say that the mind contemplates its own

weakness, we are merely saying that while the mind is attempting

to conceive something which asserts its power of activity, it is

checked in its endeavour----in other words (III. xi. note), it

feels pain. Q.E.D.

Corollary.--This pain is more and more fostered, if a man

conceives that he is blamed by others; this may be proved in the

same way as the corollary to III. liii.

Note.--This pain, accompanied by the idea of our own weakness,

is called humility; the pleasure, which springs from the

contemplation of ourselves, is called self--love or

self--complacency. And inasmuch as this feeling is renewed as

often as a man contemplates his own virtues, or his own power of

activity, it follows that everyone is fond of narrating his own

exploits, and displaying the force both of his body and mind, and

also that, for this reason, men are troublesome to one another.

Again, it follows that men are naturally envious (III. xxiv.

note, and III. xxxii. note), rejoicing in the shortcomings of

their equals, and feeling pain at their virtues. For whenever a

man conceives his own actions, he is affected with pleasure (III.

liii.), in proportion as his actions display more perfection, and

he conceives them more distinctly--that is (II. xl. note), in

proportion as he can distinguish them from others, and regard

them as something special. Therefore, a man will take most

pleasure in contemplating himself, when he contemplates some

quality which he denies to others. But, if that which he affirms

of himself be attributable to the idea of man or animals in

general, he will not be so greatly pleased: he will, on the

contrary, feel pain, if he conceives that his own actions fall

short when compared with those of others. This pain (III.

xxviii.) he will endeavour to remove, by putting a wrong

construction on the actions of his equals, or by, as far as he

can, embellishing his own.

It is thus apparent that men are naturally prone to hatred

and envy, which latter is fostered by their education. For

parents are accustomed to incite their children to virtue solely

by the spur of honour and envy. But, perhaps, some will scruple

to assent to what I have said, because we not seldom admire men's

virtues, and venerate their possessors. In order to remove such

doubts, I append the following corollary.

Corollary.--No one envies the virtue of anyone who is not his

equal.

Proof.--Envy is a species of hatred (III. xxiv. note) or (III.

xiii. note) pain, that is (III. xi. note), a modification whereby

a man's power of activity, or endeavour towards activity, is

checked. But a man does not endeavour or desire to do anything,

which cannot follow from his nature as it is given; therefore a

man will not desire any power of activity or virtue (which is the

same thing) to be attributed to him, that is appropriate to

another's nature and foreign to his own; hence his desire cannot

be checked, nor he himself pained by the contemplation of virtue

in some one unlike himself, consequently he cannot envy such an

one. But he can envy his equal, who is assumed to have the same

nature as himself. Q.E.D.

Note.--When, therefore, as we said in the note to III. lii.,

we venerate a man, through wonder at his prudence, fortitude,

&c., we do so, because we conceive those qualities to be peculiar

to him, and not as common to our nature; we, therefore, no more

envy their possessor, than we envy trees for being tall, or lions

for being courageous.

PROP. LVI. There are as many kinds of pleasure, of pain, of

desire, and of every emotion compounded of these, such as

vacillations of spirit, or derived from these, such as love,

hatred, hope, fear, &c., as there are kinds of objects whereby we

are affected.

Proof.--Pleasure and pain, and consequently the emotions

compounded thereof, or derived therefrom, are passions, or

passive states (III. xi. note); now we are necessarily passive

(III. i.), in so far as we have inadequate ideas; and only in so

far as we have such ideas are we passive (III. iii.); that is,

we are only necessarily passive (II. xl. note), in so far as we

conceive, or (II. xvii. and note) in so far as we are affected by

an emotion, which involves the nature of our own body, and the

nature of an external body. Wherefore the nature of every

passive state must necessarily be so explained, that the nature

of the object whereby we are affected be expressed. Namely, the

pleasure, which arises from, say, the object A, involves the

nature of that object A, and the pleasure, which arises from the

object B, involves the nature of the object B; wherefore these

two pleasurable emotions are by nature different, inasmuch as the

causes whence they arise are by nature different. So again the

emotion of pain, which arises from one object, is by nature

different from the pain arising from another object, and,

similarly, in the case of love, hatred, hope, fear, vacillation,

&c.

Thus, there are necessarily as many kinds of pleasure, pain,

love, hatred, &c., as there are kinds of objects whereby we are

affected. Now desire is each man's essence or nature, in so far

as it is conceived as determined to a particular action by any

given modification of itself (III. ix. note); therefore,

according as a man is affected through external causes by this or

that kind of pleasure, pain, love, hatred, &c., in other words,

according as his nature is disposed in this or that manner, so

will his desire be of one kind or another, and the nature of one

desire must necessarily differ from the nature of another desire,

as widely as the emotions differ, wherefrom each desire arose.

Thus there are as many kinds of desire, as there are kinds of

pleasure, pain, love, &c., consequently (by what has been shown)

there are as many kinds of desire, as there are kinds of objects

whereby we are affected. Q.E.D.

Note.--Among the kinds of emotions, which, by the last

proposition, must be very numerous, the chief are luxury,

drunkenness, lust, avarice, and ambition, being merely species of

love or desire, displaying the nature of those emotions in a

manner varying according to the object, with which they are

concerned. For by luxury, drunkenness, lust, avarice, ambition,

&c., we simply mean the immoderate love of feasting, drinking,

venery, riches, and fame. Furthermore, these emotions, in so far

as we distinguish them from others merely by the objects

wherewith they are concerned, have no contraries. For

temperance, sobriety, and chastity, which we are wont to oppose

to luxury, drunkenness, and lust, are not emotions or passive

states, but indicate a power of the mind which moderates the

last--named emotions. However, I cannot here explain the

remaining kinds of emotions (seeing that they are as numerous as

the kinds of objects), nor, if I could, would it be necessary.

It is sufficient for our purpose, namely, to determine the

strength of the emotions, and the mind's power over them, to have

a general definition of each emotion. It is sufficient, I

repeat, to understand the general properties of the emotions and

the mind, to enable us to determine the quality and extent of the

mind's power in moderating and checking the emotions. Thus,

though there is a great difference between various emotions of

love, hatred, or desire, for instance between love felt towards

children, and love felt towards a wife, there is no need for us

to take cognizance of such differences, or to track out further

the nature and origin of the emotions.

PROP. LVII. Any emotion of a given individual differs from the

emotion of another individual, only in so far as the essence of

the one individual differs from the essence of the other.

Proof.--This proposition is evident from Ax. i. (which see

after Lemma iii. Prop. xiii., Part II.). Nevertheless, we will

prove it from the nature of the three primary emotions.

All emotions are attributable to desire, pleasure, or pain,

as their definitions above given show. But desire is each man's

nature or essence (III. ix. note); therefore desire in one

individual differs from desire in another individual, only in so

far as the nature or essence of the one differs from the nature

or essence of the other. Again, pleasure and pain are passive

states or passions, whereby every man's power or endeavour to

persist in his being is increased or diminished, helped or

hindered (III. xi. and note). But by the endeavour to persist in

its being, in so far as it is attributable to mind and body in

conjunction, we mean appetite and desire (III. ix. note);

therefore pleasure and pain are identical with desire or

appetite, in so far as by external causes they are increased or

diminished, helped or hindered, in other words, they are every

man's nature; wherefore the pleasure and pain felt by one man

differ from the pleasure and pain felt by another man, only in so

far as the nature or essence of the one man differs from the

essence of the other; consequently, any emotion of one

individual only differs, &c. Q.E.D.

Note.--Hence it follows, that the emotions of the animals

which are called irrational (for after learning the origin of

mind we cannot doubt that brutes feel) only differ from man's

emotions, to the extent that brute nature differs from human

nature. Horse and man are alike carried away by the desire of

procreation; but the desire of the former is equine, the desire

of the latter is human. So also the lusts and appetites of

insects, fishes, and birds must needs vary according to the

several natures. Thus, although each individual lives content

and rejoices in that nature belonging to him wherein he has his

being, yet the life, wherein each is content and rejoices, is

nothing else but the idea, or soul, of the said individual, and

hence the joy of one only differs in nature from the joy of

another, to the extent that the essence of one differs from the

essence of another. Lastly, it follows from the foregoing

proposition, that there is no small difference between the joy

which actuates, say, a drunkard, and the joy possessed by a

philosopher, as I just mention here by the way. Thus far I have

treated of the emotions attributable to man, in so far as he is

passive. It remains to add a few words on those attributable to

him in so far as he is active.

PROP. LVIII. Besides pleasure and desire, which are passivities

or passions, there are other emotions derived from pleasure and

desire, which are attributable to us in so far as we are active.

Proof.--When the mind conceives itself and its power of

activity, it feels pleasure (III. liii.): now the mind

necessarily contemplates itself, when it conceives a true or

adequate idea (II. xliii.). But the mind does conceive certain

adequate ideas (II. xl. note 2.). Therefore it feels pleasure in

so far as it conceives adequate ideas; that is, in so far as it

is active (III. i.). Again, the mind, both in so far as it has

clear and distinct ideas, and in so far as it has confused ideas,

endeavours to persist in its own being (III. ix.); but by such

an endeavour we mean desire (by the note to the same Prop.);

therefore, desire is also attributable to us, in so far as we

understand, or (III. i.) in so far as we are active. Q.E.D.

PROP. LIX. Among all the emotions attributable to the mind as

active, there are none which cannot be referred to pleasure or

desire.

Proof.--All emotions can be referred to desire, pleasure, or

pain, as their definitions, already given, show. Now by pain we

mean that the mind's power of thinking is diminished or checked

(III. xi. and note); therefore, in so far as the mind feels

pain, its power of understanding, that is, of activity, is

diminished or checked (III. i.); therefore, no painful emotions

can be attributed to the mind in virtue of its being active, but

only emotions of pleasure and desire, which (by the last Prop.)

are attributable to the mind in that condition. Q.E.D.

Note.--All actions following from emotion, which are

attributable to the mind in virtue of its understanding, I set

down to strength of character (fortitudo), which I divide into

courage (animositas) and highmindedness (generositas). By

courage I mean the desire whereby every man strives to preserve

his own being in accordance solely with the dictates of reason.

By highmindedness I mean the desire whereby every man endeavours,

solely under the dictates of reason, to aid other men and to

unite them to himself in friendship. Those actions, therefore,

which have regard solely to the good of the agent I set down to

courage, those which aim at the good of others I set down to

highmindedness. Thus temperance, sobriety, and presence of mind

in danger, &c., are varieties of courage; courtesy, mercy, &c.,

are varieties of highmindedness.

I think I have thus explained, and displayed through their

primary causes the principal emotions and vacillations of spirit,

which arise from the combination of the three primary emotions,

to wit, desire, pleasure, and pain. It is evident from what I

have said, that we are in many ways driven about by external

causes, and that like waves of the sea driven by contrary winds

we toss to and fro unwitting of the issue and of our fate. But I

have said, that I have only set forth the chief conflicting

emotions, not all that might be given. For, by proceeding in the

same way as above, we can easily show that love is united to

repentance, scorn, shame, &c. I think everyone will agree from

what has been said, that the emotions may be compounded one with

another in so many ways, and so many variations may arise

therefrom, as to exceed all possibility of computation. However,

for my purpose, it is enough to have enumerated the most

important; to reckon up the rest which I have omitted would be

more curious than profitable. It remains to remark concerning

love, that it very often happens that while we are enjoying a

thing which we longed for, the body, from the act of enjoyment,

acquires a new disposition, whereby it is determined in another

way, other images of things are aroused in it, and the mind

begins to conceive and desire something fresh. For example, when

we conceive something which generally delights us with its

flavour, we desire to enjoy, that is, to eat it. But whilst we

are thus enjoying it, the stomach is filled and the body is

otherwise disposed. If, therefore, when the body is thus

otherwise disposed, the image of the food which is present be

stimulated, and consequently the endeavour or desire to eat it be

stimulated also, the new disposition of the body will feel

repugnance to the desire or attempt, and consequently the

presence of the food which we formerly longed for will become

odious. This revulsion of feeling is called satiety or

weariness. For the rest, I have neglected the outward

modifications of the body observable in emotions, such, for

instance, as trembling, pallor, sobbing, laughter, &c., for these

are attributable to the body only, without any reference to the

mind. Lastly, the definitions of the emotions require to be

supplemented in a few points; I will therefore repeat them,

interpolating such observations as I think should here and there

be added.

DEFINITIONS OF THE EMOTIONS

I. Desire is the actual essence of man, in so far as it is

conceived, as determined to a particular activity by some given

modification of itself.

Explanation.--We have said above, in the note to Prop. ix. of

this part, that desire is appetite, with consciousness thereof;

further, that appetite is the essence of man, in so far as it is

determined to act in a way tending to promote its own

persistence. But, in the same note, I also remarked that,

strictly speaking, I recognize no distinction between appetite

and desire. For whether a man be conscious of his appetite or

not, it remains one and the same appetite. Thus, in order to

avoid the appearance of tautology, I have refrained from

explaining desire by appetite; but I have take care to define it

in such a manner, as to comprehend, under one head, all those

endeavours of human nature, which we distinguish by the terms

appetite, will, desire, or impulse. I might, indeed, have said,

that desire is the essence of man, in so far as it is conceived

as determined to a particular activity; but from such a

definition (cf. II. xxiii.) it would not follow that the mind can

be conscious of its desire or appetite. Therefore, in order to

imply the cause of such consciousness, it was necessary to add,

in so far as it is determined by some given modification, &c.

For, by a modification of man's essence, we understand every

disposition of the said essence, whether such disposition be

innate, or whether it be conceived solely under the attribute of

thought, or solely under the attribute of extension, or whether,

lastly, it be referred simultaneously to both these attributes.

By the term desire, then, I here mean all man's endeavours,

impulses, appetites, and volitions, which vary according to each

man's disposition, and are, therefore, not seldom opposed one to

another, according as a man is drawn in different directions, and

knows not where to turn.

II. Pleasure is the transition of a man from a less to a greater

perfection.

III. Pain is the transition of a man from a greater to a less

perfection.

Explanation--I say transition: for pleasure is not perfection

itself. For, if man were born with the perfection to which he

passes, he would possess the same, without the emotion of

pleasure. This appears more clearly from the consideration of

the contrary emotion, pain. No one can deny, that pain consists

in the transition to a less perfection, and not in the less

perfection itself: for a man cannot be pained, in so far as he

partakes of perfection of any degree. Neither can we say, that

pain consists in the absence of a greater perfection. For

absence is nothing, whereas the emotion of pain is an activity;

wherefore this activity can only be the activity of transition

from a greater to a less perfection--in other words, it is an

activity whereby a man's power of action is lessened or

constrained (cf. III. xi. note). I pass over the definitions of

merriment, stimulation, melancholy, and grief, because these

terms are generally used in reference to the body, and are merely

kinds of pleasure or pain.

IV. Wonder is the conception (imaginatio) of anything, wherein

the mind comes to a stand, because the particular concept in

question has no connection with other concepts (cf. III. lii. and

note).

Explanation--In the note to II. xviii. we showed the reason,

why the mind, from the contemplation of one thing, straightway

falls to the contemplation of another thing, namely, because the

images of the two things are so associated and arranged, that one

follows the other. This state of association is impossible, if

the image of the thing be new; the mind will then be at a stand

in the contemplation thereof, until it is determined by other

causes to think of something else.

Thus the conception of a new object, considered in itself, is

of the same nature as other conceptions; hence, I do not include

wonder among the emotions, nor do I see why I should so include

it, inasmuch as this distraction of the mind arises from no

positive cause drawing away the mind from other objects, but

merely from the absence of a cause, which should determine the

mind to pass from the contemplation of one object to the

contemplation of another.

I, therefore, recognize only three primitive or primary

emotions (as I said in the note to III. xi.), namely, pleasure,

pain, and desire. I have spoken of wonder simply because it is

customary to speak of certain emotions springing from the three

primitive ones by different names, when they are referred to the

objects of our wonder. I am led by the same motive to add a

definition of contempt.

V. Contempt is the conception of anything which touches the mind

so little, that its presence leads the mind to imagine those

qualities which are not in it rather than such as are in it (cf.

III. lii. note).

The definitions of veneration and scorn I here pass over, for

I am not aware that any emotions are named after them.

VI. Love is pleasure, accompanied by the idea of an external

cause.

Explanation--This definition explains sufficiently clearly the

essence of love; the definition given by those authors who say

that love is the lover's wish to unite himself to the loved

object expresses a property, but not the essence of love; and,

as such authors have not sufficiently discerned love's essence,

they have been unable to acquire a true conception of its

properties, accordingly their definition is on all hands admitted

to be very obscure. It must, however, be noted, that when I say

that it is a property of love, that the lover should wish to

unite himself to the beloved object, I do not here mean by wish

consent, or conclusion, or a free decision of the mind (for I

have shown such, in II. xlviii., to be fictitious); neither do I

mean a desire of being united to the loved object when it is

absent, or of continuing in its presence when it is at hand; for

love can be conceived without either of these desires; but by

wish I mean the contentment, which is in the lover, on account of

the presence of the beloved object, whereby the pleasure of the

lover is strengthened, or at least maintained.

VII. Hatred is pain, accompanied by the idea of an external

cause.

Explanation--These observations are easily grasped after what

has been said in the explanation of the preceding definition (cf.

also III. xiii. note).

VIII. Inclination is pleasure, accompanied by the idea of

something which is accidentally a cause of pleasure.

IX. Aversion is pain, accompanied by the idea of something which

is accidentally the cause of pain (cf. III. xv. note).

X. Devotion is love towards one whom we admire.

Explanation--Wonder (admiratio) arises (as we have shown, III.

lii.) from the novelty of a thing. If, therefore, it happens

that the object of our wonder is often conceived by us, we shall

cease to wonder at it; thus we see, that the emotion of devotion

readily degenerates into simple love.

XI. Derision is pleasure arising from our conceiving the

presence of a quality, which we despise, in an object which we

hate.

Explanation--In so far as we despise a thing which we hate, we

deny existence thereof (III. lii. note), and to that extent

rejoice (III. xx.). But since we assume that man hates that

which he derides, it follows that the pleasure in question is not

without alloy (cf. III. xlvii. note).

XII. Hope is an inconstant pleasure, arising from the idea of

something past or future, whereof we to a certain extent doubt

the issue.

XIII. Fear is an inconstant pain arising from the idea of

something past or future, whereof we to a certain extent doubt

the issue (cf. III. xviii. note).

Explanation--From these definitions it follows, that there is

no hope unmingled with fear, and no fear unmingled with hope.

For he, who depends on hope and doubts concerning the issue of

anything, is assumed to conceive something, which excludes the

existence of the said thing in the future; therefore he, to this

extent, feels pain (cf. III. xix.); consequently, while

dependent on hope, he fears for the issue. Contrariwise he, who

fears, in other words doubts, concerning the issue of something

which he hates, also conceives something which excludes the

existence of the thing in question; to this extent he feels

pleasure, and consequently to this extent he hopes that it will

turn out as he desires (III. xx.).

XIV. Confidence is pleasure arising from the idea of something

past or future, wherefrom all cause of doubt has been removed.

XV. Despair is pain arising from the idea of something past or

future, wherefrom all cause of doubt has been removed.

Explanation--Thus confidence springs from hope, and despair

from fear, when all cause for doubt as to the issue of an event

has been removed: this comes to pass, because man conceives

something past or future as present and regards it as such, or

else because he conceives other things, which exclude the

existence of the causes of his doubt. For, although we can never

be absolutely certain of the issue of any particular event (II.

xxxi. Coroll.), it may nevertheless happen that we feel no doubt

concerning it. For we have shown, that to feel no doubt

concerning a thing is not the same as to be quite certain of it

(II. xlix. note). Thus it may happen that we are affected by the

same emotion of pleasure or pain concerning a thing past or

future, as concerning the conception of a thing present; this I

have already shown in III. xviii., to which, with its note, I

refer the reader.

XVI. Joy is pleasure accompanied by the idea of something past,

which has had an issue beyond our hope.

XVII. Disappointment is pain accompanied by the idea of

something past, which has had an issue contrary to our hope.

XVIII. Pity is pain accompanied by the idea of evil, which has

befallen someone else whom we conceive to be like ourselves (cf.

III. xxii. note, and III. xxvii. note).

Explanation--Between pity and sympathy (misericordia) there

seems to be no difference, unless perhaps that the former term is

used in reference to a particular action, and the latter in

reference to a disposition.

XIX. Approval is love towards one who has done good to another.

XX. Indignation is hatred towards one who has done evil to

another.

Explanation--I am aware that these terms are employed in

senses somewhat different from those usually assigned. But my

purpose is to explain, not the meaning of words, but the nature

of things. I therefore make use of such terms, as may convey my

meaning without any violent departure from their ordinary

signification. One statement of my method will suffice. As for

the cause of the above--named emotions see III. xxvii. Coroll. i.,

and III. xxii. note.

XXI. Partiality is thinking too highly of anyone because of the

love we bear him.

XXII. Disparagement is thinking too meanly of anyone because we

hate him.

Explanation--Thus partiality is an effect of love, and

disparagement an effect of hatred: so that partiality may also

be defined as love, in so far as it induces a man to think too

highly of a beloved object. Contrariwise, disparagement may be

defined as hatred, in so far as it induces a man to think too

meanly of a hated object. Cf. III. xxvi. note.

XXIII. Envy is hatred, in so far as it induces a man to be

pained by another's good fortune, and to rejoice in another's

evil fortune.

Explanation--Envy is generally opposed to sympathy, which, by

doing some violence to the meaning of the word, may therefore be

thus defined:

XXIV. Sympathy (misericordia) is love, in so far as it induces a

man to feel pleasure at another's good fortune, and pain at

another's evil fortune.

Explanation--Concerning envy see the notes to III. xxiv. and

xxxii. These emotions also arise from pleasure or pain

accompanied by the idea of something external, as cause either in

itself or accidentally. I now pass on to other emotions, which

are accompanied by the idea of something within as a cause.

XXV. Self--approval is pleasure arising from a man's

contemplation of himself and his own power of action.

XXVI. Humility is pain arising from a man's contemplation of his

own weakness of body or mind.

Explanation--Self--complacency is opposed to humility, in so

far as we thereby mean pleasure arising from a contemplation of

our own power of action; but, in so far as we mean thereby

pleasure accompanied by the idea of any action which we believe

we have performed by the free decision of our mind, it is opposed

to repentance, which we may thus define:

XXVII. Repentance is pain accompanied by the idea of some

action, which we believe we have performed by the free decision

of our mind.

Explanation--The causes of these emotions we have set forth in

III. li. note, and in III. liii., liv., lv. and note. Concerning

the free decision of the mind see II. xxxv. note. This is

perhaps the place to call attention to the fact, that it is

nothing wonderful that all those actions, which are commonly

called wrong, are followed by pain, and all those, which are

called right, are followed by pleasure. We can easily gather

from what has been said, that this depends in great measure on

education. Parents, by reprobating the former class of actions,

and by frequently chiding their children because of them, and

also by persuading to and praising the latter class, have brought

it about, that the former should be associated with pain and the

latter with pleasure. This is confirmed by experience. For

custom and religion are not the same among all men, but that

which some consider sacred others consider profane, and what some

consider honourable others consider disgraceful. According as

each man has been educated, he feels repentance for a given

action or glories therein.

XXVIII. Pride is thinking too highly of one's self from

self--love.

Explanation--Thus pride is different from partiality, for the

latter term is used in reference to an external object, but pride

is used of a man thinking too highly of himself. However, as

partiality is the effect of love, so is pride the effect or

property of self--love, which may therefore be thus defined, love

of self or self--approval, in so far as it leads a man to think

too highly of himself. To this emotion there is no contrary.

For no one thinks too meanly of himself because of self--hatred;

I say that no one thinks too meanly of himself, in so far as he

conceives that he is incapable of doing this or that. For

whatsoever a man imagines that he is incapable of doing, he

imagines this of necessity, and by that notion he is so disposed,

that he really cannot do that which he conceives that he cannot

do. For, so long as he conceives that he cannot do it, so long

is he not determined to do it, and consequently so long is it

impossible for him to do it. However, if we consider such

matters as only depend on opinion, we shall find it conceivable

that a man may think too meanly of himself; for it may happen,

that a man, sorrowfully regarding his own weakness, should

imagine that he is despised by all men, while the rest of the

world are thinking of nothing less than of despising him. Again,

a man may think too meanly of himself, if he deny of himself in

the present something in relation to a future time of which he is

uncertain. As, for instance, if he should say that he is unable

to form any clear conceptions, or that he can desire and do

nothing but what is wicked and base, &c. We may also say, that a

man thinks too meanly of himself, when we see him from excessive

fear of shame refusing to do things which others, his equals,

venture. We can, therefore, set down as a contrary to pride an

emotion which I will call self--abasement, for as from

self--complacency springs pride, so from humility springs

self--abasement, which I will accordingly thus define:

XXIX. Self--abasement is thinking too meanly of one's self by

reason of pain.

Explanation--We are nevertheless generally accustomed to

oppose pride to humility, but in that case we pay more attention

to the effect of either emotion than to its nature. We are wont

to call proud the man who boasts too much (III. xxx. note), who

talks of nothing but his own virtues and other people's faults,

who wishes to be first; and lastly who goes through life with a

style and pomp suitable to those far above him in station. On

the other hand, we call humble the man who too often blushes, who

confesses his faults, who sets forth other men's virtues, and

who, lastly, walks with bent head and is negligent of his attire.

However, these emotions, humility and self--abasement, are

extremely rare. For human nature, considered in itself, strives

against them as much as it can (see III. xiii., liv.); hence

those, who are believed to be most self--abased and humble, are

generally in reality the most ambitious and envious.

XXX. Honour[11] is pleasure accompanied by the idea of some action

of our own, which we believe to be praised by others.

[11] Gloria.

XXXI. Shame is pain accompanied by the idea of some action of

our own, which we believe to be blamed by others.

Explanation--On this subject see the note to III. xxx. But we

should here remark the difference which exists between shame and

modesty. Shame is the pain following the deed whereof we are

ashamed. Modesty is the fear or dread of shame, which restrains

a man from committing a base action. Modesty is usually opposed

to shamelessness, but the latter is not an emotion, as I will

duly show; however, the names of the emotions (as I have

remarked already) have regard rather to their exercise than to

their nature.

I have now fulfilled the task of explaining the emotions

arising from pleasure and pain. I therefore proceed to treat of

those which I refer to desire.

XXXII. Regret is the desire or appetite to possess something,

kept alive by the remembrance of the said thing, and at the same

time constrained by the remembrance of other things which exclude

the existence of it.

Explanation--When we remember a thing, we are by that very

fact, as I have already said more than once, disposed to

contemplate it with the same emotion as if it were something

present; but this disposition or endeavour, while we are awake,

is generally checked by the images of things which exclude the

existence of that which we remember. Thus when we remember

something which affected us with a certain pleasure, we by that

very fact endeavour to regard it with the same emotion of

pleasure as though it were present, but this endeavour is at once

checked by the remembrance of things which exclude the existence

of the thing in question. Wherefore regret is, strictly

speaking, a pain opposed to that of pleasure, which arises from

the absence of something we hate (cf. III. xlvii. note). But, as

the name regret seems to refer to desire, I set this emotion

down, among the emotions springing from desire.

XXXIII. Emulation is the desire of something, engendered in us

by our conception that others have the same desire.

Explanation--He who runs away, because he sees others running

away, or he who fears, because he sees others in fear; or again,

he who, on seeing that another man has burnt his hand, draws

towards him his own hand, and moves his body as though his own

were burnt; such an one can be said to imitate another's

emotion, but not to emulate him; not because the causes of

emulation and imitation are different, but because it has become

customary to speak of emulation only in him, who imitates that

which we deem to be honourable, useful, or pleasant. As to the

cause of emulation, cf. III. xxvii. and note. The reason why

this emotion is generally coupled with envy may be seen from III.

xxxii. and note.

XXXIV. Thankfulness or Gratitude is the desire or zeal springing

from love, whereby we endeavour to benefit him, who with similar

feelings of love has conferred a benefit on us. Cf. III. xxxix.

note and xl.

XXXV. Benevolence is the desire of benefiting one whom we pity.

Cf. III. xxvii. note.

XXXVI. Anger is the desire, whereby through hatred we are

induced to injure one whom we hate, III. xxxix.

XXXVII. Revenge is the desire whereby we are induced, through

mutual hatred, to injure one who, with similar feelings, has

injured us. (See III. xl. Coroll. ii and note.)

XXXVIII. Cruelty or savageness is the desire, whereby a man is

impelled to injure one whom we love or pity.

Explanation--To cruelty is opposed clemency, which is not a

passive state of the mind, but a power whereby man restrains his

anger and revenge.

XXXIX. Timidity is the desire to avoid a greater evil, which we

dread, by undergoing a lesser evil. Cf. III. xxxix. note.

XL. Daring is the desire, whereby a man is set on to do

something dangerous which his equals fear to attempt.

XLI. Cowardice is attributed to one, whose desire is checked by

the fear of some danger which his equals dare to encounter.

Explanation--Cowardice is, therefore, nothing else but the

fear of some evil, which most men are wont not to fear; hence I

do not reckon it among the emotions springing from desire.

Nevertheless, I have chosen to explain it here, because, in so

far as we look to the desire, it is truly opposed to the emotion

of daring.

XLII. Consternation is attributed to one, whose desire of

avoiding evil is checked by amazement at the evil which he fears.

Explanation--Consternation is, therefore, a species of

cowardice. But, inasmuch as consternation arises from a double

fear, it may be more conveniently defined as a fear which keeps a

man so bewildered and wavering, that he is not able to remove the

evil. I say bewildered, in so far as we understand his desire of

removing the evil to be constrained by his amazement. I say

wavering, in so far as we understand the said desire to be

constrained by the fear of another evil, which equally torments

him: whence it comes to pass that he knows not, which he may

avert of the two. On this subject, see III. xxxix. note, and

III. lii. note. Concerning cowardice and daring, see III. li.

note.

XLIII. Courtesy, or deference (Humanitas seu modestia), is the

desire of acting in a way that should please men, and refraining

from that which should displease them.

XLIV. Ambition is the immoderate desire of power.

Explanation--Ambition is the desire, whereby all the emotions

(cf. III. xxvii. and xxxi.) are fostered and strengthened;

therefore this emotion can with difficulty be overcome. For, so

long as a man is bound by any desire, he is at the same time

necessarily bound by this. "The best men," says Cicero, "are

especially led by honour. Even philosophers, when they write a

book contemning honour, sign their names thereto," and so on.

XLV. Luxury is excessive desire, or even love of living

sumptuously.

XLVI. Intemperance is the excessive desire and love of drinking.

XLVII. Avarice is the excessive desire and love of riches.

XLVIII. Lust is desire and love in the matter of sexual

intercourse.

Explanation--Whether this desire be excessive or not, it is

still called lust. These last five emotions (as I have shown in

III. lvi.) have on contraries. For deference is a species of

ambition. Cf. III. xxix. note.

Again, I have already pointed out, that temperance, sobriety,

and chastity indicate rather a power than a passivity of the

mind. It may, nevertheless, happen, that an avaricious, an

ambitious, or a timid man may abstain from excess in eating,

drinking, or sexual indulgence, yet avarice, ambition, and fear

are not contraries to luxury, drunkenness, and debauchery. For

an avaricious man often is glad to gorge himself with food and

drink at another man's expense. An ambitious man will restrain

himself in nothing, so long as he thinks his indulgences are

secret; and if he lives among drunkards and debauchees, he will,

from the mere fact of being ambitious, be more prone to those

vices. Lastly, a timid man does that which he would not. For

though an avaricious man should, for the sake of avoiding death,

cast his riches into the sea, he will none the less remain

avaricious; so, also, if a lustful man is downcast, because he

cannot follow his bent, he does not, on the ground of abstention,

cease to be lustful. In fact, these emotions are not so much

concerned with the actual feasting, drinking, &c., as with the

appetite and love of such. Nothing, therefore, can be opposed to

these emotions, but high--mindedness and valour, whereof I will

speak presently.

The definitions of jealousy and other waverings of the mind I

pass over in silence, first, because they arise from the

compounding of the emotions already described; secondly, because

many of them have no distinctive names, which shows that it is

sufficient for practical purposes to have merely a general

knowledge of them. However, it is established from the

definitions of the emotions, which we have set forth, that they

all spring from desire, pleasure, or pain, or, rather, that there

is nothing besides these three; wherefore each is wont to be

called by a variety of names in accordance with its various

relations and extrinsic tokens. If we now direct our attention

to these primitive emotions, and to what has been said concerning

the nature of the mind, we shall be able thus to define the

emotions, in so far as they are referred to the mind only.

GENERAL DEFINITION OF THE EMOTIONS

Emotion, which is called a passivity of the soul, is a

confused idea, whereby the mind affirms concerning its body, or

any part thereof, a force for existence (existendi vis) greater

or less than before, and by the presence of which the mind is

determined to think of one thing rather than another.

Explanation--I say, first, that emotion or passion of the soul

is a confused idea. For we have shown that the mind is only

passive, in so far as it has inadequate or confused ideas. (III.

iii.) I say, further, whereby the mind affirms concerning its

body or any part thereof a force for existence greater than

before. For all the ideas of bodies, which we possess, denote

rather the actual disposition of our own body (II. xvi. Coroll.

ii.) than the nature of an external body. But the idea which

constitutes the reality of an emotion must denote or express the

disposition of the body, or of some part thereof, because its

power of action or force for existence is increased or

diminished, helped or hindered. But it must be noted that, when

I say a greater or less force for existence than before, I do not

mean that the mind compares the present with the past disposition

of the body, but that the idea which constitutes the reality of

an emotion affirms something of the body, which, in fact,

involves more or less of reality than before.

And inasmuch as the essence of mind consists in the fact (II.

xi., xiii.), that it affirms the actual existence of its own

body, and inasmuch as we understand by perfection the very

essence of a thing, it follows that the mind passes to greater or

less perfection, when it happens to affirm concerning its own

body, or any part thereof, something involving more or less

reality than before.

When, therefore, I said above that the power of the mind is

increased or diminished, I merely meant that the mind had formed

of its own body, or of some part thereof, an idea involving more

or less of reality, than it had already affirmed concerning its

own body. For the excellence of ideas, and the actual power of

thinking are measured by the excellence of the object. Lastly, I

have added by the presence of which the mind is determined to

think of one thing rather than another, so that, besides the

nature of pleasure and pain, which the first part of the

definition explains, I might also express the nature of desire.

Ethics(#3800) · 第 4 / 7 章