THE TORIES AND THE WAR OF THE SPANISH SUCCESSION (1712).

+Source.+--Swift: _The Conduct of the Allies_. Vol. v., pp. 66-72.

Swift's Works, Bohn edition.

At the Revolution, a general war broke out in Europe, wherein many

princes joined in an alliance against France, to check the ambitious

designs of that monarch; and here the emperor, the Dutch, and England

were principals. About this time the custom first began among us of

borrowing millions upon funds of interest: It was pretended, that the

war could not possibly last above one or two campaigns; and that the

debts contracted might be easily paid in a few years, by a gentle tax,

without burthening the subject. But the true reason for embracing this

expedient, was the security of a new prince, not firmly settled on the

throne: People were tempted to lend, by great premiums and large

interest, and it concerned them nearly to preserve that government,

which they trusted with their money. The person[30] said to have been

author of so detestable a project, is still living, and lives to see

some of its fatal consequences, whereof his grandchildren will not see

an end. And this pernicious counsel closed very well with the posture of

affairs at that time: For, a set of upstarts, who had little or no part

in the Revolution, but valued themselves by their noise and pretended

zeal when the work was over, were got into credit at court, by the merit

of becoming undertakers and projectors of loans and funds: These,

finding that the gentlemen of estates were not willing to come into

their measures, fell upon those new schemes of raising money, in order

to create a monied interest, that might in time vie with the landed, and

of which they hoped to be at the head.

The ground of the first war, for ten years after the Revolution, as to

the part we had in it, was, to make France acknowledge the late king,

and to recover Hudson's Bay. But during that whole war, the sea was

almost entirely neglected, and the greatest part of six millions

annually employed to enlarge the frontier of the Dutch. For the king was

a general, but not an admiral; and although King of England, was a

native of Holland.

After ten years fighting to little purpose; after the loss of above an

hundred thousand men, and a debt remaining of twenty millions, we at

length hearkened to the terms of a peace, which was concluded with great

advantages to the empire and Holland, but none at all to us;[31] and

clogged soon after by the famous treaty of partition;[32] by which,

Naples, Sicily, and Lorrain, were to be added to the French dominions;

or if that crown should think fit to set aside the treaty, upon the

Spaniards refusing to accept it, as they declared they would, to the

several parties at the very time of transacting it; then the French

would have pretensions to the whole monarchy. And so it proved in the

event; for the late King of Spain reckoning it an indignity to have his

territories cantoned out into parcels, by other princes, during his own

life, and without his consent, rather chose to bequeath the monarchy

entire to a younger son of France: And this prince[33] was acknowledged

for King of Spain both by us and Holland.

It must be granted, that the counsels of entering into this war were

violently opposed by the church-party, who first advised the late king

to acknowledge the Duke of Anjou; and particularly, 'tis affirmed that a

certain great person,[34] who was then in the church interest, told the

king in November, 1701, That since His Majesty was determined to engage

in a war so contrary to his private opinion, he could serve him no

longer, and accordingly gave up his employment; though he happened

afterwards to change his mind, when he was to be at the head of the

Treasury, and have the sole management of affairs at home; while those

abroad were to be in the hands of one, whose advantage, by all sorts of

ties, he was engaged to promote.

The declarations of war against France and Spain, made by us and

Holland, are dated within a few days of each other. In that published by

the States, they say very truly That "they are nearest, and most exposed

to the fire; that they are blocked up on all sides, and actually

attacked by the Kings of France and Spain; that their declaration is the

effect of an urgent and pressing necessity;" with other expressions to

the same purpose. They "desire the assistance of all kings and princes,"

&c. The grounds of their quarrel with France, are such as only affect

themselves, or at least more immediately than any other prince or state;

such as, "the French refusing to grant the Tariff promised by the treaty

of Ryswick; the loading the Dutch inhabitants settled in France, with

excessive duties, contrary to the said treaty; the violation of the

Partition Treaty, by the French accepting the King of Spain's will, and

threatening the States, if they would not comply; the seizing the

Spanish Netherlands by the French troops, and turning out the Dutch, who

by permission of the late King of Spain were in garrison there; by which

means that republic was deprived of her barrier, contrary to the treaty

of partition, where it was particularly stipulated, that the Spanish

Netherlands should be left to the archduke." They alleged, that "the

French king governed Flanders as his own, though under the name of his

grandson, and sent great numbers of troops thither to fright them: That

he had seized the city and citadel of Liège, had possessed himself of

several places in the archbishopric of Cologne, and maintained troops in

the country of Wolfenbuttel, in order to block up the Dutch on all

sides; and caused his resident to give in a memorial, wherein he

threatened the States to act against them, if they refused complying

with the contents of that memorial."

The Queen's declaration of war is grounded upon the grand alliance, as

this was upon the unjust usurpations and encroachments of the French

king; whereof the instances produced are, "his keeping in possession a

great part of the Spanish dominions, seizing Milan and the Spanish Low

Countries, making himself master of Cadiz, &c. And instead of giving

satisfaction in these points, his putting an indignity and affront on

Her Majesty and kingdoms, by declaring the pretended Prince of Wales, K.

of England, &c.," which last was the only personal quarrel we had in the

war; and even this was positively denied by France, that king being

willing to acknowledge Her Majesty.

I think it plainly appears by both declarations, that England ought no

more to have been a principal in this war, than Prussia, or any other

power, who came afterwards into that alliance. Holland was first in the

danger, the French troops being at that time just at the gates of

Nimeguen. But the complaints made in our declaration, do all, except the

last, as much or more concern almost every prince in Europe.

For, among the several parties who came first or last into this

confederacy, there were but few who, in proportion, had more to get or

to lose, to hope or to fear, from the good or ill success of this war,

than we. The Dutch took up arms to defend themselves from immediate

ruin; and by a successful war, they proposed to have a larger extent of

country, and a better frontier against France. The emperor hoped to

recover the monarchy of Spain, or some part of it, for his younger son,

chiefly at the expense of us and Holland. The King of Portugal had

received intelligence, that Philip designed to renew the old pretensions

of Spain upon that kingdom, which is surrounded by the other on all

sides, except towards the sea, and could therefore only be defended by

maritime powers. This, with the advantageous terms offered by K.

Charles,[35] as well as by us, prevailed with that prince to enter into

the alliance. The Duke of Savoy's temptations and fears were yet

greater: The main charge of the war on that side was to be supplied by

England, and the profit to redound to him. In case Milan should be

conquered, it was stipulated that his highness should have the Duchy of

Montferrat, belonging to the Duke of Mantua, the provinces of Alexandria

and Valencia, and Lomellino, with other lands between the Po and the

Tanaro, together with the Vigevenasco, or in lieu of it, an equivalent

out of the province of Novara, adjoining to his own state; beside

whatever else could be taken from France on that side by the confederate

forces. Then, he was in terrible apprehensions of being surrounded by

France, who had so many troops in the Milanese, and might have easily

swallowed up his whole duchy.

The rest of the allies came in purely for subsidies, whereof they sunk

considerable sums into their own coffers, and refused to send their

contingent to the emperor, alleging their troops were already hired by

England and Holland.

Some time after the Duke of Anjou's succeeding to the monarchy of Spain,

in breach of the partition treaty, the question here in England was,

Whether the peace should be continued, or a new war begun. Those who

were for the former alleged the debts and difficulties we laboured

under; that both we and the Dutch had already acknowledged Philip for

King of Spain; that the inclinations of the Spaniards to the house of

Austria, and their aversion for that of Bourbon, were not so surely to

be reckoned upon, as some would pretend; that we thought it a piece of

insolence, as well as injustice, in the French to offer putting a king

upon us; and the Spaniards would conceive, we had as little reason to

force one upon them; that it was true, the nature and genius of those

two people differed very much, and so would probably continue to do, as

well under a king of French blood, as one of Austrian; but, that if we

should engage in a war for dethroning the D. of Anjou, we should

certainly effect what, by the progress and operations of it, we

endeavoured to prevent, I mean an union of interest and affections

between the two nations; for the Spaniards must of necessity call in

French troops to their assistance: This would introduce French

counsellors into King Phillip's court; and this, by degrees, would

habituate and reconcile the two nations: That to assist King Charles by

English or Dutch forces, would render him odious to his new subjects,

who have nothing in so great an abomination, as those whom they hold for

heretics: That the French would by this means become masters of the

treasures in the Spanish West Indies: That, in the last war, when Spain,

Cologne, and Bavaria were in our alliance, and by a modest computation

brought sixty thousand men into the field against the common enemy; when

Flanders, the seat of war, was on our side, and His Majesty, a prince of

great valour and conduct, at the head of the whole confederate army; yet

we had no reason to boast of our success: How then should we be able to

oppose France with those powers against us, which would carry sixty

thousand men from us to the enemy, and so make us, upon the balance,

weaker by one hundred and twenty thousand men at the beginning of this

war, than of that in 1688?

On the other side, those whose opinion, or some private motives,

inclined them to give their advice for entering into a new war, alleged

how dangerous it would be for England, that Philip should be King of

Spain; that we could have no security for our trade, while that kingdom

was subject to a prince of the Bourbon family; nor any hopes of

preserving the balance of Europe, because the grandfather would, in

effect, be king, while his grandson had but the title, and thereby have

a better opportunity than ever of pursuing his design for universal

monarchy. These and the like arguments prevailed; and so, without

offering at any other remedy, without taking time to consider the

consequences, or to reflect on our own condition, we hastily engaged in

a war which hath cost us sixty millions; and after repeated, as well as

unexpected success in arms, hath put us and our posterity in a worse

condition, not only than any of our allies, but even our conquered

enemies themselves.

The part we have acted in the conduct of this whole war, with reference

to our allies abroad, and to a prevailing faction at home, is what I

shall now particularly examine; where I presume it will appear, by plain

matters of fact, that no nation was ever so long or so scandalously

abused by the folly, the temerity, the corruption, the ambition of its

domestic enemies; or treated with so much insolence, injustice and

ingratitude by its foreign friends.

This will be manifest by proving the three following points.

_First_, That against all manner of prudence, or common reason, we

engaged in this war as principals, when we ought to have acted only as

auxiliaries.

_Secondly_, That we spent all our vigour in pursuing that part of the

war which could least answer the end we proposed by beginning of it; and

made no efforts at all where we could have most weakened the common

enemy, and at the same time enriched ourselves.

_Lastly_, That we suffered each of our allies to break every article in

those treaties and agreements by which they were bound, and to lay the

burthen upon us.

[30] Dr. Gilbert Burnet, Bishop of Sarum.

[31] The Peace of Ryswick, concluded in October, 1697. All that Louis

did for England by that peace was to acknowledge William as King of

England, and to engage not to assist his enemies. The Dutch and Leopold,

however, were much better treated. The former had its commerce

re-established, while to the latter were given many fortresses and

towns, and advantages strengthening his empire. The Peace of Ryswick was

truly not a peace, but a temporary cessation of hostilities.

[32] The Partition Treaties arose out of the troublesome question of the

Spanish succession. After the Peace of Ryswick William III. and Louis

XIV. attempted to settle this question by a partition of the Spanish

possessions.

[33] This was Philip of Anjou, second son of the Dauphin.

[34] Sidney Godolphin, one of the greatest financiers among English

statesmen. He was Lord High Treasurer under Queen Anne, and an intimate

friend, as well as relative by marriage, of Marlborough. He was created

an Earl in 1706, but was removed from his office at the fall of the Whig

ministry in 1710.

[35] The Archduke Charles, who styled himself Charles III. of Spain.

A Constitution in Making (1660-1714) · 第 73 / 76 题