THE STORY-TELLER

HE changed with the seasons, and, like the seasons, was welcome in every

mood. In spring he was forlorn and passionate in turn; now fiercely

eloquent, now tuneful with those little cheerful songs that seem in terms

of human emotion to be the saddest of all. In summer he dreamed in

sensuous and unambitious idleness, gladly conscious of the sunshine and

warm winds and flower-smells, and using only languorous and gentle words.

In autumn, with the dead leaves of the world about his feet, he became

strangely hopeful and generous of glad promises of adventure and

conquest. It seemed as though he found it easier to triumph when Nature

had abdicated her jealous throne. But it was in the winter-time when he

came into his own kingdom, and mastered his environment and his passions

to make the most joyful songs. Then he would lie at full length on the

hearthrug, and we children, sitting in a rapt circle, fantastically lit

by the fire, would listen to his stories, and know that they were the

authentic wisdom.

It was in vain that the grown-ups warned us against the fascinations of

his society, telling us that dreamers came to no good end in a practical

world. As well might the townsfolk of Hamelin, in Brunswick, have

ordered their children to turn a deaf ear to the tune of the Pied Piper.

We had studied life from a practical point of view between our games, and

found it unsatisfying; this man brought us something infinitely more

desirable. He would come stepping with delicate feet, fearful of

trampling on our own tender dreams, and he would tell us the enchanted

stories that we had not heard since we were born. He told us the meaning

of the stars and the significance of the sun and moon; and, listening to

him, we remembered that we had known it all once before in another place.

Sometimes even we would remind him of some trivial incident that he had

forgotten, and then he would look at us oddly and murmur sadly that he

was getting very old. When the stories were over, and all the room was

still ringing with beautiful echoes, he would stand erect and ask us

fiercely whether we saw any straws in his hair. We would climb up him to

look (for he was very tall), and when we told him that we could not find

any he would say: “The day you see them there will be no more stories.”

We knew what the stories were worth to us, so we were always afraid of

looking at his head for fear that we should see the straws and all our

gladdest hours should be finished.

His voice was all the music extant, and it was only by recalling it that

our young ears could find that there was beauty in fine singing and

melodiousness in the chaunt of birds. Yet when his words were eloquent

we forgot the voice and the speaker, content to sacrifice our critical

individualities to his inspiration till we were no more than dim and

silent figures in the background of his tale. It was only in winter-time

that he achieved this supreme illusion; perhaps the firelight helped him,

and the chill shadows of the world. In the summer his stories had the

witchery of dreams; their realism startled us, and yet we knew that they

were not real. After listening to them through a hot afternoon we would

stretch back into consciousness, as though we had been asleep; his drowsy

fancies lulled our personalities, but did not conquer them. The winter

magic was of a rarer kind. Then even his silences became significant,

for he brought us to so close an intimacy with his mind that his very

thoughts seemed like words.

It is idle to expect a child to believe that every grown-up person was a

child once upon a time, for it is not credible that they could have

forgotten so much. But this man was a child both in feeling and in

understanding. He knew the incidents that perplexed us in those nursery

legends that have become classics, and sometimes it was his pleasure to

tell them to us again, having regard to our wakeful sympathies. He was

the friend of all the poor, lost creatures of romance—the giants whose

humiliating lot it was to be defeated by any stripling lad, the dragons

whose flaming strength was a derision when opposed to virtue in armour.

He shared our pity for Antæus and Caliban and Goliath of Gath, and even

treated sorcerers and wicked kings with reasonable humanity. Somehow,

though we felt that it was wicked, we could not help being sorry for

people when they were punished very severely. The very ease with which

giants could be outwitted suggested that the great simple fellows might

prove amiable enough if they were kindly treated, while it was always

possible that dragons might turn out to be bewitched princes, if only the

beautiful princesses would kiss them instead of sending heroes to kill

them unfairly, without giving them an opportunity of explaining their

motives. Our story-teller understood our scruples and sympathised with

them, and in his versions every one had a chance, whether they were

heroes or no. Even the best children are sometimes cruel, but they are

never half so pitiless as the writers of fairy-stories.

But better than any fairy-stories were the stories that he told us of our

own lives, which under his touch became the wonderful adventures which

they really were. He showed us that it was marvellous to get out of bed

in the morning, and marvellous to get into bed at night. He made us

realise the imaginative value of common things, and the fun that could be

derived even from the performance of duties, by aid of a little

make-believe. The grown-up folk would probably have derided his system,

but he made us tolerate our lessons, and endure the pangs of toothache

with some degree of fortitude. He had a short way with the ugly bogies

with which thoughtless nurses and chance echoes from the horrors columns

of newspapers had peopled the shadows of our life. We were no longer

afraid of the dark when he had told us how friendly it could be to the

distressed. Hitherto we had vainly sought to find the colours and sounds

of romance in life, and, failing, had been tempted to sum up the whole

business as tedious. After he had shown us how to do it, it was easy to

see that life itself was a story as romantic as we cared to make it. Our

daily official walks became gallant expeditions, and we approached

arithmetic with a flaming sword.

Can any childhood ever have known a greater wizard than this? And yet

since that state does not endure for ever, it must surely have happened

to us to seek for straws in his towering head once too often, had not

death taken our kindly enchanter from our company, and thus spared us the

bitter discovery that the one man who reconciled us to life was

considered rather more than eccentric by an obtuse world. It is true

that we noticed that the grown-up people were apt to treat him sometimes

as if he were one of us, but we felt that he merited this distinction,

and did not find it strange. Nor did we wonder that he should tell

stories aloud to himself lacking a wider audience, for we knew that if we

had the power we should tell such stories to ourselves all day long. We

did not only fail to realise that he was mad; we knew that he was the

only reasonable creature of adult years who ever came near us. He

understood us and paid us the supreme compliment of allowing us to

understand him. The world called him fantastic for actions that

convinced us that he was wise, and, thanks to a fate that seemed at the

time insensately cruel, the spell was never broken.

The Day Before Yesterday · 第 11 / 43 题