There are certain characteristics, qualities, of London which I am aware

of not calling aright, but which I will call _sentiments_ for want of

some better word. One of them was the feel of the night-air, especially

late in the season, when there was a waste and weariness in it as if

the vast human endeavor for pleasure and success had exhaled its

despair upon it. Whatever there was of disappointment in one's past,

of apprehension in one's future, came to the surface of the spirit, and

asserted its unity with the collective melancholy. It was not exactly a

_Weltschmerz_; that is as out-dated as the romantic movement; but it was

a sort of scientific relinquishment, which was by no means scornful of

others, or too appreciative of one's own unrecognized worth. Through

the senses it related itself to the noises of the quiescing city, to the

smell of its tormented dust, to the whiff of a casual cigar, or the odor

of the herbage and foliage in the park or square that one was passing,

one may not be more definite about what was perhaps nothing at all. But

I fancy that relinquishment of any sort would be easier in London than

in cities of simpler interest or smaller population. For my own part I

was content to deny many knowledges that I would have liked to believe

myself possessed of, and to go about clothed in my ignorance as in a

garment, or defended by it as by armor. There was a sort of luxury in

passing through streets memorable for a thousand things and as dense

with associations as Long Island with mosquitoes when the winds are low,

and in reflecting that I need not be ashamed for neglecting in part what

no man could know in whole. I really suppose that upon any other terms

the life of the cultivated American would be hardly safe from his own

violence in London. If one did not shut one's self out from the complex

appeal to one's higher self one could hardly go to one's tailor or one's

hatter or one's shoemaker, on those missions which, it is a national

superstition with us, may be more inexpensively fulfilled there than

at home. The best way is to begin by giving up everything, by frankly

saying to yourself that you will not be bothered, that man's days of

travel are full of trouble, and that you are going to get what little

joy you can out of them as you go along. Then, perhaps, on some errand

of quite ignoble purport, you will be seized with the knowledge that

in the very spot where you stand one of the most significant things

in history happened. It will be quite enough for you, as you inhale

a breath of the London mixture of smoke, dust, and fog, that it is

something like the air which Shakespeare and Milton breathed when

they were meditating the works which have given so many international

after-dinner orators the assurance of a bond of amity in our common

language. Once, in driving through one of the dullest streets

imaginable, I chanced to look out of the side-window of my hansom, and

saw on a flying house-wall a tablet reading: “Here lived John Dryden,”

and though Dryden is a poet to move one to tenderness as little as may

be, the tears came into my eyes.

It is but one of a thousand names, great in some sort or other, which

make sojourn in London impossible, if one takes them to heart as an

obligation to consciousness of her constant and instant claim. They show

you Johnson's house in Bolt Court, but it only avails to vex you with

the thought of the many and many houses of better and greater men which

they will never show you. As for the scenes of events in fiction you

have a plain duty to shun them, for in a city where the great facts

of the past are written so deep upon the walls and pavement one over

another, it is folly which can be forgiven only to the vacancy of youth

to go looking for the places where this imaginary thing happened. Yet

this claim of folly has been recognized, and if you wish to indulge

it, you can do so at little trouble. Where the real localities are not

available they have fictitious ones, and they show you an Old Curiosity

Shop, for instance, which serves every purpose of having been the home

of Little Nell. There are at least three Cock Taverns, and several

Mitres, all genuine; and so on. Forty odd years ago I myself, on first

arriving in London, lodged at the Golden Cross, because it was there

that David Copperfield stopped; and I was insensately pleased the other

day that there was still a hotel of that name at the old stand. Whether

it was the old inn, I did not challenge the ghost within me to say. I

doubt if you now dine there “off the joint” in the “coffee-room”; more

probably you have a _table d'hôte_ meal served you “at separate tables,”

by a German lad just beginning to ignore English. The shambling elderly

waiter who was part of the furniture in 1861 is very likely dead; and

for the credit of our country I hope that the recreant American whom I

heard telling an Englishman there in those disheartening days, of our

civic corruptions, may have also passed away. He said that he himself

had bought votes, as many as he wanted, in the city of Providence; and

though I could deny the general prevalence of such venality at least in

my own stainless state of Ohio, I did not think to suggest that in such

a case the corruption was in the buyer rather than the seller of the

votes, and that if he had now come to live, as he implied, in a purer

country, he had not taken the right way to be worthy of it. But at

twenty-four you cannot think of everything at once, and a recreant

American is so uncommon that you need hardly, at any age, provide for

him.

XX

PARTING GUESTS

However the Golden Cross Inn may have inwardly or outwardly changed,

the Golden Cross Hotel keeps its old place hard by the Charing Cross

station, which is now so different from the station of the earlier day.

I do not think it is one of the most sympathetic of the London stations.

I myself prefer rather the sentiment of the good old Euston station,

which continues for you the feeling of arrival in England, and keeps you

in the glow of landing that you have, or had in the days when you always

landed in Liverpool, and the constant Cunarders and Inmans ignored the

upstart pretensions of Southampton and Plymouth to be ports of entry

from the United States. But among the stations of minor autobiographical

interest, Charing Cross is undoubtedly the first, and you may have

your tenderness for it as the place where you took the train for the

nightboat at Folkestone in first crossing to the continent. How strange

it all was, and yet how not unfriendly; for there is always a great deal

of human nature in England. She is very motherly, even with us children

who ran away from home, and only come back now and then to make sure

that we are glad of having done so. In the lamp-broken obscurity of the

second-class carriage I am aware still of a youthful exile being asked

his destination, and then his derivation, by a gentle old lady in the

seat opposite (she might have been Mother England in person), who,

hearing that he was from America where the civil war was then very

unpromising, could only say, comfortingly: “And very glad to be out of

it, _I_ dare say!” He must protest, but if he failed to convince, how

could he explain that part of his high mission to the ports of the

Lombardo-Venetian Kingdom was to sweep from the Adriatic the Confederate

privateers which Great Britain was then fitting out to prey upon our

sparse commerce there? As a matter of fact he had eventually to do

little or no sweeping of that sort; for no privateers came to interrupt

the calm in which he devoted himself, unofficially, to writing a book

about the chief of those ports.

It was the first of many departures from London, where you are always

more or less arriving or departing as long as you remain in England. It

is indeed an axiom with the natives that if you want to go from any

one point to any other in the island it is easier to come to London and

start afresh for it, than to reach the point across country. The trains

to and from the capital are swifter and more frequent, and you are not

likely to lose your way in the mazes of Bradshaw if you consult the

indefinitely simplified A B C tables which instruct you how to launch

yourself direct from London upon any objective, or to recoil from it. My

impression is that you habitually drive to a London station as nearly in

time to take your train as may be, and that there is very little use

for waiting-rooms. This may be why the waiting-room seems so small and

unattractive a part of the general equipment. It never bears any

such proportion to the rest as the waiting-rooms in the great Boston

stations, or even that of the Grand Central in New York, and is by no

chance so really fine as that of the Atchison and Topeka at Omaha, or

that of the Lake Shore at Pittsburg. Neither the management nor the

climate is so unkind as to keep intending passengers from the platforms,

where they stand talking, or walk up and down, or lean from their

carriage-doors and take leave of attendant friends with repeated pathos.

With us it is either too cold or too hot to do that, and at all

the great stations we are now fenced off from the tracks, as on the

Continent, and unless we can make favor with the gateman, must despatch

our farewells before our parting dear ones press forward to have

their tickets punched. But at no London station, and far less at any

provincial station in England, are you subjected to these formalities;

and the English seem to linger out their farewells almost abusively,

especially if they are young and have much of life before them.

Charing Cross has the distinction, sole among her sister stations, of a

royal entrance. There is no doubt a reason for this; but as royalty is

always coming and going in every direction, it is not easy to know why

the other stations do not provide themselves with like facilities. One

cannot imagine just how the king and queen get in and out of the common

gateway, but it has to be managed everywhere but at Charing Cross,

no matter what hardship to royalty it involves. Neither has any other

station a modern copy of a Queen Eleanor's Cross, but this is doubtless

because no other station was the last of these points where her coffin

was set down on its way from Lincoln to its final restingplace in

Westminster. You cannot altogether regret their lack after you have seen

such an original cross as that of Northampton, for though the Victorian

piety which replaced the monument at Charing Cross was faithful and

earnest, it was not somehow the art of 1291. One feels no greater

hardness in the Parliamentary zeal which razed the cross in 1647 than in

the stony fidelity of detail which hurts the eye in the modern work,

and refuses to be softened by any effect of the mellowing London air. It

looks out over the scurry of cabs, the ponderous tread of omnibuses, the

rainfall patter of human feet, as inexorably latter-day as anything

in the Strand. It is only an instance of the constant futility of the

restoration which, in a world so violent or merely wearing as ours,

must still go on, and give us dead corpses of the past instead of living

images. Fortunately it cannot take from Charing Cross its preeminence

among the London railway stations, which is chiefly due to its place

in the busy heart of the town, and to that certain openness of aspect,

which sometimes, as with the space at Hyde Park Corner, does the effect

of sunniness in London. It may be nearer or farther, as related to

one's own abode, but it has not the positive remoteness from the great

centres, by force of which, for instance, Waterloo seems in a peripheral

whirl of non-arrival, and Vauxhall lost somewhere in a rude borderland,

and King's Cross bewildered in a roar of tormented streets beyond

darkest Bloomsbury. Even Paddington, which is of a politer situation,

and is the gate of the beautiful West-of-England country, has not the

allure of Charing Cross; even Euston which so sweetly prolongs the

old-fashioned Liverpool voyage from New York, and keeps one to the last

moment in a sense of home, really stays one from London by its kind

reluctance. It is at Charing Cross alone that you are immediately and

unmistakably in the London of your dreams.

I think that sooner or later we had arrived at or departed from all the

great stations, but I will not make so sure of St. Pancras. I am afraid

that I was, more strictly speaking, only at a small church hard by, of

so marked a ritualistic temperament that it had pictures in it, and gave

me an illusion of Italy, though I was explicitly there because of an

American origin in the baptism of Junius Brutus Booth. I am sorry I do

not remember the name of that little church, but it stood among autumn

flowers, in the heart of a still, sunny morning, where the reader will

easily find it. Of Victoria station I am many times certain, for it was

from it that we at last left London, and that at the time of an earlier

sojourn we arrived in a fog of a type which stamped our sense of

the world's metropolis with a completeness which it had hitherto

disappointingly wanted.

It had been a dull evening on the way up from Dover, but not uncommonly

dull for an evening of the English November, and we did not notice that

we had emerged from the train into an intensified obscurity. In the

corridors of the station-hotel hung wreaths of what a confident spirit

of our party declared to be smoke, in expression of the alarming

conviction that the house was on fire. Nobody but ourselves seemed

troubled by the smoke, however, and with a prompt recurrence to the

reading which makes the American an intimate of the English circumstance

though he has never personally known it, we realized that what seemed

smoke must be a very marked phase of London fog. It did not perceptibly

thicken in-doors that night, but the next day no day dawned, nor, for

that matter, the day after the next. All the same the town was invisibly

astir everywhere in a world which hesitated at moments between total and

partial blindness. The usual motives and incentives were at work in

the business of men, more like the mental operations of sleep than of

waking. From the height of an upper window one could look down and feel

the city's efforts to break the mesh of its weird captivity, with an

invisible stir in all directions, as of groping. Of course, life had

to go on, upon such terms as it could, and if you descended from your

window that showed nothing, and went into the street, and joined the

groping, you could make out something of its objects. With a cabman who

knew his way, as a pilot knows his way on a river in a black night, you

could depart and even arrive. In the course of your journey you would

find the thoroughfare thick with hesitating or arrested traffic. At one

place you would be aware of a dull, red light, brightening into a veiled

glare, and you would have come upon a group of horses, detached from

several omnibuses, and standing head to head till they might hopefully

be put to and driven on again. The same light, with the torches carried

by boys, would reveal trucks and carts stopped, or slowly creeping

forward. Cab-horses between the blotches of flame made by the cab-lamps

were craning their necks forward, or twitching them from side to side.

Through the press foot-passengers found their way across the street, and

imaginably in the dark that swallowed up the sidewalks, they were going

and coming on errands that could brook no stay. The wonder was that they

could know which way they were going, or how they could expect to reach

any given point.

Where the buildings were densest the fog was thinnest, and there it was

a greenish-yellow, like water when you open your eyes and look at it far

below the surface. Where the houses fell away, and you found yourself in

a square, or with a park on one side, the vapor thickened into blackness

and seemed to swell, a turbid tide, overhead and underfoot. It hurt your

straining eyes, and got into your throat, and burned it like a sullen

steam. If your cab stopped, miraculously enough, at the address given,

you got out incredulous and fearful of abandonment. When you emerged

again, and found your cab waiting, you mutely mounted to your place and

resumed your strange quality of something in a dream.

So, all that day the pall hung upon the town, and all the next. The

third day the travellers were to sail from Liverpool, and there was some

imperative last-shopping on the eve. Two of them took a courageous cab,

and started for Bond Street. In a few moments the cab was in the thick

of the fog and its consequences, a tangle of stationary vehicles with

horses detached, or marking time, without advancing either way. A

trembling hand lifted the little trap in the cab-roof, and a trembling

voice asked the cabman: “Do you think you can go on?” “I think so, sir.”

The horse's head had already vanished; now his haunches faded away.

Towards the dashboard the shafts of another cab came yawing, and again

the eager voice quavered: “Do you think you can get back?” “Oh yes,

sir,” the answer came more cheerfully, and the shopping was done a week

later in Twenty-third Street.

There is an insensate wish in the human witness to have nature when she

begins misbehaving do her worst. One longs to have her go all lengths,

and this perhaps is why an earthquake, or a volcanic eruption, of

violent type is so satisfactory to those it spares. It formed the secret

joy of the great blizzard of 1888, and it must form the mystical delight

of such a London fog as we had experienced. But you see the blizzard

once in a generation or a century, while if you are good, or good enough

to live in London, you may see a characteristic fog almost any year. It

is another case in which the metropolis of the New World must yield to

the metropolis of the whole world. Fog for fog, I do not say but the fog

in which we left New York, on March 3, 1904, was not as perfect as our

great London fog. But the New York fog was only blindingly white and the

London fog blindingly black, and that is a main difference.

The tender and hesitating mist with which each day of our final

September in London began, must not be confused in the reader's mind

with a true London fog. The mist grew a little heavier, day by day,

perhaps; but only once the sun failed to burn through it before noon,

and that was one of the first days of October, as if in September it had

not yet lost the last of its summer force. Even then, though it rained

all the forenoon, and well into the afternoon, the weather cleared for a

mild, warm sunset, and we could take the last of our pleasant walks from

Half-Moon Street into St. James's Park.

When the last day of our London sojourn came, it was fitly tearful, and

we had our misgivings of the Channel crossing. The crossing of the day

before had been so bad that _Pretty Polly_, who had won the St. Leger,

held all England in approving suspense, while her owners decided that

she should not venture to the defeat that awaited her in France, till

the sea was smoother. But in the morning the papers prophesied fair

weather, and it was promised that _Pretty Polly_ should cross. Her

courage confirmed our own, and we took our initial departure in the

London fashion which is so different from the New York fashion. Not with

the struggle, personally and telephonically, in an exchange of bitter

sarcasms prolonged with the haughty agents of the express monopoly, did

we get our baggage expensively before us to the station and follow in

a costly coupé, but with all our trunks piled upon two reasonable

four-wheelers, we set out contemporaneously with them. In New York we

paid six dollars for our entire transportation to the steamer; in London

we paid six shillings to reach the Victoria station with our belongings.

The right fare would have been five; the imagination of our cabman rose

to three and six each, and feebly fluttered there, but sank to three,

and did not rise again. At our admirable lodging the landlady, the

butler and the chambermaid had descended with us to the outer door in a

smiling convention of regret, the kindly Swiss boots allowed the

street porter to help him up with our trunks, and we drove away in

the tradition of personal acceptability which bathes the stranger in

a gentle self-satisfaction, and which prolonged itself through all the

formalities of registering our baggage for the continent at the station,

of bribing the guard in the hope of an entire first-class compartment

to ourselves and then sharing it with four others similarly promised

its sole use, and of telegraphing to secure seats in the _rapide_ from

Calais to Paris.

Then we were off in a fine chill, small English rain through a landscape

in which all the forms showed like figures in blotting-paper, as

Taine said, once for all. After we had run out of the wet ranks of

yellowish-black city houses, and passed the sullen suburbs,

“All in a death-doing autumn-dripping gloom,”

we found ourselves in a world which was the dim ghost of the English

country we had so loved in the summer. On some of the trees and

hedgerows the leaves hung dull yellow or dull red, but on most they were

a blackening green. The raw green of the cold flat meadows, the purplish

green of the interminable ranks of cabbages, and the harsh green of

the turnip-fields, blurred with the reeking yellow of mustard bloom,

together with the gleaming brown of ploughed fields, formed a prospect

from which the eye turned with the heart, in a rapturous vision of the

South towards which we were now swiftly pulsing.

THE END

London Films · 第 16 / 16 段