Chapter XVII.

Liberation from One's Place.

The instinct which drives men to travel is at bottom identical with

that which fills men with passionate desire to know what is in life.

Time and strength are often wasted in restless change from place to

place; but real wandering, however aimless in mood, is always

education. To know one's neighbours and to be on good terms with the

community in which one lives are the beginning of sound relations to

the world at large; but one never knows his village in any real sense

until he knows the world. The distant hills which seem to be always

calling the imaginative boy away from the familiar fields and hearth

do not conspire against his peace, however much they may conspire

against his comfort; they help him to the fulfilment of his destiny by

suggesting to his imagination the deeper experience, the richer

growth, the higher tasks which await him in the world beyond the

horizon. Man is a wanderer by the law of his life; and if he never

leaves his home in which he is born, he never builds a home of his

own.

It is the law of life that a child should leave his father and

separate himself from his inherited surroundings, in order that by

self-unfolding and self-realisation he may substitute a conscious for

an unconscious, a moral for an instinctive relation. The instinct of

the myth-makers was sound when it led them to attach such importance

to the wandering and the return; the separation effected in order that

individuality and character might be realised through isolation and

experience, the return voluntarily made through clear recognition of

the soundness of the primitive relations, the beauty of the service of

the older and wiser to the younger and the more ignorant. We are born

into relations which we accept as normal and inevitable; we break away

from them in order that by detachment we may see them objectively and

from a distance, and that we may come to self-consciousness; we resume

these relations of deliberate purpose and with clear perception of

their moral significance. So the boy, grown to manhood, returns to his

home from the world in which he has tested himself and seen for the

first time, with clear eyes, the depth and beauty of its service in

the spiritual order; so the man who has revolted from the barren and

shallow dogmatic statement of a spiritual truth returns, in riper

years and with a deeper insight, to the truth which is no longer

matter of inherited belief but of vital need and perception.

The ripe, mature, full mind not only escapes the limitation of the

time in which it finds itself; it also escapes from the limitations of

the place in which it happens to be. A man of deep culture cannot be a

provincial; he must be a citizen of the world. The man of provincial

tastes and ideas owns the acres; the man of culture commands the

landscape. He knows the world beyond the hills; he sees the great

movement of life from which the village seems almost shut out; he

shares those inclusive experiences which come to each age and give

each age a character of its own. He is in fellowship and sympathy with

the smaller community at his doors, but he belongs also to that

greater community which is coterminous with humanity itself. He is not

disloyal to his immediate surroundings when he leaves them for

exploration, travel, and discovery; he is fulfilling that law of life

which conditions true valuation of that into which one is born upon

clear perception of that which one must acquire for himself.

The wanderings of individuals and races, which form so large a part of

the substance of history, are witnesses of that craving for deeper

experience and wider knowledge which is one of the springs of human

progress. The American cares for Europe not for its more skilful and

elaborate ministration to his comfort; he is drawn towards it through

the appeal of its rich historic life to his imagination and through

the diversity and variety of its social and racial phenomena. And in

like manner the European seeks the East, not simply as a matter of

idle curiosity, but because he finds in the East conditions which are

set in such sharp contrast with those with which he is familiar. The

instinct for expansion which gives human history its meaning and

interest is constantly urging the man of sensitive mind to secure by

observation that which he cannot get by experience.

To secure the most complete development one must live in one's time

and yet live above it, and one must also live in one's home and yet

live, at the same time, in the world. The life which is bounded in

knowledge, interest, and activity by the invisible but real and

limiting walls of a small community is often definite in aim,

effective in action, and upright in intention; but it cannot be rich,

varied, generous, and stimulating. The life, on the other hand, which

is entirely detached from local associations and tasks is often

interesting, liberalising, and catholic in spirit; but it cannot be

original or productive. A sound life--balanced, poised, and

intelligently directed--must stand strongly in both local and

universal relations; it must have the vitality and warmth of the

first, and the breadth and range of the second.

This liberation from provincialism is not only one of the signs of

culture, but it is also one of its finest results; it registers a high

degree of advancement. For the man who has passed beyond the

prejudices, misconceptions, and narrowness of provincialism has gone

far on the road to self-education. He has made as marked an advance on

the position of the great mass of his contemporaries as that position

is an advance on the earlier stages of barbarism. The barbarian lives

only in his tribe; the civilised man, in the exact degree in which he

is civilised, lives with humanity. Books are among the richest

resources against narrowing local influences; they are the ripest

expositions of the world-spirit. To know the typical books of the race

is to be in touch with those elements of thought and experience which

are shared by men of all countries. Without a knowledge of these books

a man never really gets at the life of localities which are foreign to

him; never really sees those historic places about which the

traditions of civilisation have gathered. Travel is robbed of half its

educational value unless one carries with him a knowledge of that

which he looks at for the first time with his own eyes. No American

sees England unless he carries England in his memory and imagination.

Westminster Abbey is devoid of spiritual significance to the man who

is ignorant of the life out of which it grew, and of the history which

is written in its architecture and its memorials. The emancipation

from the limitations of locality is greatly aided by travel, but it is

accomplished only by intimate knowledge of the greater books.

Books and Culture · 第 17 / 24 章