DIAMOND CUT DIAMOND.

1 will here relate a case which occurred not long since, as going to

show how well-experienced men will play more than their number. A

gambler got to playing, coming up from Goodwood, with a man whom he

mistook for a “greeney” that knew nothing of playing _scientifically_.

But he was sadly deceived. The gambler from the beginning played

somewhat carelessly, supposing that it needed no science to beat the

stranger; but the gambler lost, and commenced playing as scientifically

as he could. He still lost, and finally lost nearly all he had before he

left off; and after quitting, they went to the buffet to drink. The

gambler said to his antagonist, “You beat any man for luck I ever played

with. I’ve lost my money with you, but it makes no difference: I will be

honest with you; you did not know it, but I played six cards all the

time, and your luck beat it.” “Well,” said the innocent chap, “since you

have been so frank, I will also be frank; I have played _seven_ cards

all the way through, besides stocking and palming and occasionally

stealing, for the sake of variety.” The gambler was greatly surprised,

and swore that he would not have supposed that he knew much more than

one card from another; but he was deceived in the man, and it would not

have done for him to have shown any anger, as he first confessed having

cheated the other, who was in reality a most expert gambler, and had

purposely assumed that disguise.

Hanky Panky · 第 431 / 457 题