COROLLARY II.

It is evident that if the line _AD_ had been given originally, and we

had been required to draw it, and divide it into three equal parts, we

should have had only to divide its sight-magnitude, _ad′_, into the

three equal parts, _ab′_, _b′c′_, and _c′d′_, and then, drawing to _M_

from _b′_ and _c′_, the line _ad_ would have been divided as required

in _b_ and _c_. And supposing the original line _AD_ be divided

_irregularly into any number_ of parts, if the line _ad′_ be divided

into a similar number in the same proportions (by the construction

given in Appendix I.), and, from these points of division, lines are

drawn to _M_, they will divide the line _ad_ in true perspective into

a similar number of proportionate parts.

The horizontal line drawn through _a_, on which the sight-magnitudes

are measured, is called the “MEASURING-LINE.”

And the line _ad_, when properly divided in _b_ and _c_, or any other

required points, is said to be divided “IN PERSPECTIVE RATIO” to the

divisions of the original line _AD_.

If the line _aV_ is above the sight-line instead of beneath it, the

measuring-line is to be drawn above also: and the lines _b′M_, _c′M_,

etc., drawn _down_ to the dividing-point. Turn Fig. 17. upside down,

and it will show the construction.

The Elements of Perspective arranged for the use of schools and intended to be read in connection with the first three books of Euclid · 第 30 / 91 题