The proposition is peace. Not peace through the medium of war; not

peace to be hunted through the labyrinth of intricate and endless

negotiations; not peace to arise out of universal discord fomented,

from principle, in all parts of the Empire, not peace to depend on the

juridical determination of perplexing questions, or the precise marking

the shadowy boundaries of a complex government. It is simple peace;

sought in its natural course, and in its ordinary haunts. It is peace

sought in the spirit of peace, and laid in principles purely pacific. I

propose, by removing the ground of the difference, and by restoring the

former unsuspecting confidence of the Colonies in the Mother Country,

to give permanent satisfaction to your people; and (far from a scheme of

ruling by discord) to reconcile them to each other in the same act and

by the bond of the very same interest which reconciles them to British

government.

My idea is nothing more. Refined policy [Footnote: 8] ever has been, the

parent of confusion; and ever will be so, as long as the world endures.

Plain good intention, which is as easily discovered at the first view

as fraud is surely detected at last, is, let me say, of no mean force in

the government of mankind. Genuine simplicity of heart is an healing

and cementing principle. My plan, therefore, being formed upon the most

simple grounds imaginable, may disappoint some people when they hear it.

It has nothing to recommend it to the pruriency of curious ears. There

is nothing at all new and captivating in it. It has nothing of the

splendor of the project [Footnote: 9] which has been lately laid upon

your table by the noble lord in the blue ribbon. [Footnote: 10] It does

not propose to fill your lobby with squabbling Colony agents, [Footnote:

11] who will require the interposition of your mace, at every instant,

to keep the peace amongst them. It does not institute a magnificent

auction of finance, where captivated provinces come to general ransom

by bidding against each other, until you knock down the hammer, and

determine a proportion of payments beyond all the powers of algebra to

equalize and settle.

The plan which I shall presume to suggest derives, however, one great

advantage from the proposition and registry of that noble lord's

project. The idea of conciliation is admissible. First, the House,

in accepting the resolution moved by the noble lord, has admitted,

notwithstanding the menacing front of our address, [Footnote: 12]

notwithstanding our heavy bills of pains and penalties--that we do not

think ourselves precluded from all ideas of free grace and bounty.

The House has gone farther; it has declared conciliation admissible,

previous to any submission on the part of America. It has even shot a

good deal beyond that mark, and has admitted that the complaints of our

former mode of exerting the right of taxation were not wholly unfounded.

That right thus exerted is allowed to have something reprehensible in

it, something unwise, or something grievous; since, in the midst of

our heat and resentment, we, of ourselves, have proposed a

capital alteration; and in order to get rid of what seemed so very

exceptionable, have instituted a mode that is altogether new; one that

is, indeed, wholly alien from all the ancient methods and forms of

Parliament.

The principle of this proceeding is large enough for my purpose. The

means proposed by the noble lord for carrying his ideas into execution,

I think, indeed, are very indifferently suited to the end; and this I

shall endeavor to show you before I sit down. But, for the present, I

take my ground on the admitted principle. I mean to give peace. Peace

implies reconciliation; and where there has been a material dispute,

reconciliation does in a manner always imply concession on the one

part or on the other. In this state of things, I make no difficulty

in affirming that the proposal ought to originate from us. Great and

acknowledged force is not impaired, either in effect or in opinion, by

an unwillingness to exert itself. The superior power may offer peace

with honor and with safety. Such an offer from such a power will be

attributed to magnanimity. But the concessions of the weak are the

concessions of fear. When such a one is disarmed, he is wholly at the

mercy of his superior; and he loses forever that time and those chances,

[Footnote: 13] which, as they happen to all men, are the strength and

resources of all inferior power.

The capital leading questions on which you must this day decide are

these two: First, whether you ought to concede; and secondly, what your

concession ought to be. On the first of these questions we have gained,

as I have just taken the liberty of observing to you, some ground. But

I am sensible that a good deal more is still to be done. Indeed, Sir,

to enable us to determine both on the one and the other of these great

questions with a firm and precise judgment, I think it may be necessary

to consider distinctly the true nature and the peculiar circumstances

of the object which we have before us; because after all our struggle,

whether we will or not, we must govern America according to that nature

and to those circumstances, [Footnote: 14] and not according to our

own imaginations, nor according to abstract ideas of right--by no means

according to mere general theories of government, the resort to which

appears to me, in our present situation, no better than arrant trifling.

I shall therefore endeavor, with your leave, to lay before you some

of the most material of these circumstances in as full and as clear a

manner as I am able to state them.

The first thing that we have to consider with regard to the nature of

the object is--the number of people in the Colonies. I have taken for

some years a good deal of pains on that point. I can by no calculation

justify myself in placing the number below two millions of inhabitants

of our own European blood and color, besides at least five hundred

thousand others, who form no inconsiderable part of the strength and

opulence of the whole. This, Sir, is, I believe, about the true number.

There is no occasion to exaggerate where plain truth is of so much

weight and importance. But whether I put the present numbers too high

or too low is a matter of little moment. Such is the strength with which

population shoots in that part of the world, that, state the numbers as

high as we will, whilst the dispute continues, the exaggeration ends.

Whilst we are discussing any given magnitude, they are grown to it.

Whilst we spend our time in deliberating on the mode of governing two

millions, we shall find we have millions more to manage. Your children

do not grow faster from infancy to manhood than they spread from

families to communities, and from villages to nations.

I put this consideration of the present and the growing numbers in the

front of our deliberation, because, Sir, this consideration will make

it evident to a blunter discernment than yours, that no partial, narrow,

contracted, pinched, occasional system will be at all suitable to such

an object. It will show you that it is not to be considered as one of

those minima which are out of the eye and consideration of the law;

not a paltry excrescence of the state; not a mean dependent, who may be

neglected with little damage and provoked with little danger. It will

prove that some degree of care and caution is required in the handling

such an object; it will show that you ought not, in reason, to trifle

with so large a mass of the interests and feelings of the human race.

You could at no time do so without guilt; and be assured you will not be

able to do it long with impunity.

But the population of this country, the great and growing population,

though a very important consideration, will lose much of its weight if

not combined with other circumstances. The commerce of your Colonies is

out of all proportion beyond the numbers of the people. This ground

of their commerce indeed has been trod some days ago, and with great

ability, by a distinguished person at your bar. This gentleman, after

thirty-five years--it is so long since he first appeared at the same

place to plead for the commerce of Great Britain--has come again before

you to plead the same cause, without any other effect of time, than

that to the fire of imagination and extent of erudition which even then

marked him as one of the first literary characters of his age, he has

added a consummate knowledge in the commercial interest of his country,

formed by a long course of enlightened and discriminating experience.

Sir, I should be inexcusable in coming after such a person with any

detail, if a great part of the members who now fill the House had not

the misfortune to be absent when he appeared at your bar. Besides, Sir,

I propose to take the matter at periods of time somewhat different from

his. There is, if I mistake not, a point of view from whence, if you

will look at the subject, it is impossible that it should not make an

impression upon you.

I have in my hand two accounts; one a comparative state of the export

trade of England to its Colonies, as it stood in the year 1704, and as

it stood in the year 1772; the other a state of the export trade of this

country to its Colonies alone, as it stood in 1772, compared with the

whole trade of England to all parts of the world (the Colonies included)

in the year 1704. They are from good vouchers; the latter period from

the accounts on your table, the earlier from an original manuscript of

Davenant, who first established the Inspector-General's office, which

has been ever since his time so abundant a source of Parliamentary

information.

The export trade to the Colonies consists of three great branches: the

African--which, terminating almost wholly in the Colonies, must be

put to the account of their commerce,--the West Indian, and the North

American. All these are so interwoven that the attempt to separate them

would tear to pieces the contexture of the whole; and, if not entirely

destroy, would very much depreciate the value of all the parts. I

therefore consider these three denominations to be, what in effect they

are, one trade. [Footnote: 15]

The trade to the Colonies, taken on the export side, at the beginning of

this century, that is, in the year 1704, stood thus:--

Exports to North America and the West Indies. L483,265

To Africa. .................................. 86,665

--------

L569,930

In the year 1772, which I take as a middle year between the highest and

lowest of those lately laid on your table, the account was as follows:--

To North America and the West Indies ...... L4,791,734

To Africa. ................................ 866,398

To which, if you add the export trade from

Scotland, which had in 1704 no existence .. 364,000

----------

L6,022,132

From five hundred and odd thousand, it has grown to six millions. It

has increased no less than twelve-fold. This is the state of the

Colony trade as compared with itself at these two periods within this

century;--and this is matter for meditation. But this is not all.

Examine my second account. See how the export trade to the Colonies

alone in 1772 stood in the other point of view; that is, as compared to

the whole trade of England in 1704:--

The whole export trade of England, including

that to the Colonies, in 1704. ................ L6,509,000

Export to the Colonies alone, in 1772 ......... 6,024,000

----------

Difference, L485,000

The trade with America alone is now within less than L500,000 of being

equal to what this great commercial nation, England, carried on at

the beginning of this century with the whole world! If I had taken the

largest year of those on your table, it would rather have exceeded. But,

it will be said, is not this American trade an unnatural protuberance,

that has drawn the juices from the rest of the body? The reverse. It

is the very food that has nourished every other part into its present

magnitude. Our general trade has been greatly augmented, and augmented

more or less in almost every part to which it ever extended; but

with this material difference, that of the six millions which in the

beginning of the century constituted the whole mass of our export

commerce, the Colony trade was but one-twelfth part, it is now (as a

part of sixteen millions) considerably more than a third of the whole.

This is the relative proportion of the importance of the Colonies at

these two periods, and all reasoning concerning our mode of treating

them must have this proportion as its basis, or it is a reasoning weak,

rotten, and sophistical.

Mr. Speaker, I cannot prevail on myself to hurry over this great

consideration. [Footnote: 15] IT IS GOOD FOR US TO BE HERE. [Footnote:

16] We stand where we have an immense view of what is, and what is past.

Clouds, indeed, and darkness, rest upon the future. Let us, however,

before we descend from this noble eminence, reflect that this growth of

our national prosperity has happened within the short period of the life

of man. It has happened within sixty-eight years. There are those alive

whose memory might touch the two extremities. For instance, my Lord

Bathurst might remember all the stages of the progress. He was in 1704

of an age at least to be made to comprehend such things. He was then old

enough acta parentum jam legere, et quae sit potuit cognoscere virtus.

[Footnote: 17] Suppose, Sir, that the angel of this auspicious youth,

foreseeing the many virtues which made him one of the most amiable, as

he is one of the most fortunate, men of his age, had opened to him in

vision that when in the fourth generation the third Prince of the House

of Brunswick had sat twelve years on the throne of that nation which, by

the happy issue of moderate and healing counsels, was to be made Great

Britain, he should see his son, Lord Chancellor of England, turn back

the current of hereditary dignity to its fountain, and raise him to

a higher rank of peerage, whilst he enriched the family with a new

one--if, amidst these bright and happy scenes of domestic honor and

prosperity, that angel should have drawn up the curtain, and unfolded

the rising glories of his country, and, whilst he was gazing with

admiration on the then commercial grandeur of England, the genius should

point out to him a little speck, scarcely visible in the mass of the

national interest, a small seminal principle, rather than a formed body,

and should tell him: "Young man, there is America--which at this day

serves for little more than to amuse you with stories of savage men, and

uncouth manners; yet shall, before you taste of death, [Footnote: 18]

show itself equal to the whole of that commerce which now attracts the

envy of the world. Whatever England has been growing to by a progressive

increase of improvement, brought in by varieties of people, by

succession of civilizing conquests and civilizing settlements in a

series of seventeen hundred years, you shall see as much added to her

by America in the course of a single life!" If this state of his

country had been foretold to him, would it not require all the sanguine

credulity of youth, and all the fervid glow of enthusiasm, to make him

believe it? Fortunate man, he has lived to see it! Fortunate, indeed,

if he lives to see nothing that shall vary the prospect, and cloud the

setting of his day!

Excuse me, Sir, if turning from such thoughts I resume this comparative

view once more. You have seen it on a large scale; look at it on a small

one. I will point out to your attention a particular instance of it

in the single province of Pennsylvania. In the year 1704 that province

called for L11,459 in value of your commodities, native and foreign.

This was the whole. What did it demand in 1772? Why, nearly fifty times

as much; for in that year the export to Pennsylvania was L507,909,

nearly equal to the export to all the Colonies together in the first

period.

I choose, Sir, to enter into these minute and particular details,

because generalities, which in all other cases are apt to heighten and

raise the subject, have here a tendency to sink it. When we speak of

the commerce with our Colonies, fiction lags after truth, invention is

unfruitful, and imagination cold and barren.

So far, Sir, as to the importance of the object, in view of its

commerce, as concerned in the exports from England. If I were to detail

the imports, I could show how many enjoyments they procure which deceive

the burthen of life; how many materials which invigorate the springs of

national industry, and extend and animate every part of our foreign and

domestic commerce. This would be a curious subject indeed; but I must

prescribe bounds to myself in a matter so vast and various.

I pass, therefore, to the Colonies in another point of view, their

agriculture. This they have prosecuted with such a spirit, that, besides

feeding plentifully their own growing multitude, their annual export

of grain, comprehending rice, has some years ago exceeded a million in

value. Of their last harvest I am persuaded they will export much more.

At the beginning of the century some of these Colonies imported corn

from the Mother Country. For some time past the Old World has been

fed from the New. The scarcity which you have felt would have been a

desolating famine, if this child of your old age, with a true filial

piety, with a Roman charity, [Footnote: 19] had not put the full breast

of its youthful exuberance to the mouth of its exhausted parent.

As to the wealth which the Colonies have drawn from the sea by their

fisheries, you had all that matter fully opened at your bar. You surely

thought those acquisitions of value, for they seemed even to excite your

envy; and yet the spirit by which that enterprising employment has been

exercised ought rather, in my opinion, to have raised your esteem and

admiration. And pray, Sir, what in the world is equal to it? Pass by the

other parts, and look at the manner in which the people of New England

have of late carried on the whale fishery. Whilst we follow them among

the tumbling mountains of ice, and behold them penetrating into the

deepest frozen recesses of Hudson's Bay and Davis's Straits, whilst we

are looking for them beneath the arctic circle, we hear that they have

pierced into the opposite region of polar cold, that they are at the

antipodes, and engaged under the frozen Serpent of the south. Falkland

Island, which seemed too remote and romantic an object for the grasp of

national ambition, is but a stage and resting-place in the progress of

their victorious industry. Nor is the equinoctial heat more discouraging

to them than the accumulated winter of both the poles. We know that

whilst some of them draw the line and strike the harpoon on the coast

of Africa, others run the longitude and pursue their gigantic game along

the coast of Brazil. No sea but what is vexed by their fisheries; no

climate that is not witness to their toils. Neither the perseverance of

Holland, nor the activity of France, nor the dexterous and firm sagacity

of English enterprise ever carried this most perilous mode of hardy

industry to the extent to which it has been pushed by this recent

people; a people who are still, as it were, but in the gristle, and not

yet hardened into the bone of manhood. When I contemplate these things;

when I know that the Colonies in general owe little or nothing to any

care of ours, and that they are not squeezed into this happy form by the

constraints of watchful and suspicious government, but that, through a

wise and salutary neglect, a generous nature has been suffered to take

her own way to perfection; when I reflect upon these effects, when I see

how profitable they have been to us, I feel all the pride of power sink,

and all presumption in the wisdom of human contrivances melt and die

away within me. My rigor relents. I pardon something to the spirit of

liberty.

I am sensible, Sir, that all which I have asserted in my detail is

admitted in the gross; but that quite a different conclusion is drawn

from it. America, gentlemen say, is a noble object. It is an object well

worth fighting for. Certainly it is, if fighting a people be the best

way of gaining them. Gentlemen in this respect will be led to their

choice of means by their complexions [Footnote: 20] and their habits.

Those who understand the military art will of course have some

predilection for it. Those who wield the thunder of the state [Footnote:

21] may have more confidence in the efficacy of arms. But I confess,

possibly for want of this knowledge, my opinion is much more in favor

of prudent management than of force; considering force not as an odious,

but a feeble instrument for preserving a people so numerous, so active,

so growing, so spirited as this, in a profitable and subordinate

connection with us.

First, Sir, permit me to observe that the use of force alone is but

temporary. It may subdue for a moment, but it does not remove the

necessity of subduing again; and a nation is not governed [Footnote: 22]

which is perpetually to be conquered.

My next objection is its uncertainty. Terror is not always the effect of

force, and an armament is not a victory. If you do not succeed, you are

without resource; for, conciliation failing, force remains; but, force

failing, no further hope of reconciliation is left. Power and authority

are sometimes bought by kindness; but they can never be begged as alms

by an impoverished and defeated violence.

A further objection to force is, that you impair the object by your

very endeavors to preserve it. The thing you fought for is not the thing

which you recover; but depreciated, sunk, wasted, and consumed in the

contest. Nothing less will content me than WHOLE AMERICA. I do not

choose to consume its strength along with our own, because in all parts

it is the British strength that I consume. I do not choose to be caught

by a foreign enemy at the end of this exhausting conflict; and still

less in the midst of it. I may escape; but I can make no insurance

against such an event. Let me add, that I do not choose wholly to break

the American spirit; because it is the spirit that has made the country.

Lastly, we have no sort of experience in favor of force as an instrument

in the rule of our Colonies. Their growth and their utility has been

owing to methods altogether different. Our ancient indulgence [Footnote:

23] has been said to be pursued to a fault. It may be so. But we know if

feeling is evidence, that our fault was more tolerable than our attempt

to mend it; and our sin far more salutary than our penitence.

These, Sir, are my reasons for not entertaining that high opinion of

untried force by which many gentlemen, for whose sentiments in other

particulars I have great respect, seem to be so greatly captivated. But

there is still behind a third consideration concerning this object which

serves to determine my opinion on the sort of policy which ought to be

pursued in the management of America, even more than its population and

its commerce--I mean its temper and character.

In this character of the Americans, a love of freedom is the

predominating feature which marks and distinguishes the whole; and as an

ardent is always a jealous affection, your Colonies become suspicious,

restive, and untractable whenever they see the least attempt to wrest

from them by force, or shuffle from them by chicane, what they think

the only advantage worth living for. This fierce spirit of liberty is

stronger in the English Colonies probably than in any other people of

the earth, and this from a great variety of powerful causes; which, to

understand the true temper of their minds and the direction which this

spirit takes, it will not be amiss to lay open somewhat more largely.

Burke's Speech on Conciliation with America · 第 2 / 8 段